Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.05.15_City Council AgendaY: Notice and agenda filed in the office of t lia*nne C'erk and poste t Ay Hall at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, May 11, 2012. kR vens , epu erk AGENDA 1. Call to Order -Mayor Doug Bonebrake 2. Invocation Pastor Blake Altman of Trinity Owasso 3. Flag Salute 4. Roll Call 5. Presentation of Character Certificate to Henry Bodden Mayor Councilor Brown Mayor Bonebrake and Councilor Brown will recognize Henry Bodden for the character trait of Diligence. 6. Presentation of the Mayor's Proclamation Mayor The Mayor will present a proclamation declaring June 1 -3 as Strikes Against Cancer weekend in the City of Owasso. 7. Citizen request to address the City Council Kristen Saint Attachment #7 Ms. Saint is requesting to address the Council regarding the placement of a traffic calming device in the Fairways at Bailey Ranch in the area of N. 10 1 st East Avenue, between E. 95th Court North and E. 95th Street North. ;q�. Owasso City Council May 15, 2012 Page 2 8. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the Consent Agenda. All matters lifted under "Consent" are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Councilor may, however, remove an item from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non - debatable. A. Approval of Minutes of the May 1, 2012 Regular Meeting and the May 8, 2012 Special Meeting Attachment # 8 -A B. Approval of Claims Attachment # 8 -B C. Acknowledge receipt of the monthly budget status report Attachment # 8 -C 9. Consideration and appropridte action relating to items removed from the Consent Agenda 10. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a workers' compensation settlement Ms. Michele Dempster Attachment #10 Staff recommends City Council approval and authorization for payment of the workers' compensation settlement for David Sole in the total amount of $30,685. 11. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of an amendment to the 2025 Land Use Master Plan Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment #11 Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Land Use Master Plan. 12. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD- 12 -01) and Rezoning - 91netyEight Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 12 Staff recommends approval of the PUD for the 9inetyEight development and associated rezoning to RM (Residential Multi - Family). 13. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for re- approval of the Final Plat, Villas at Stonebridge Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 13 Staff recommends re- approval of the final plat for the Villas at Stonebridge. 14. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the Final Plat, Lakeridge Shopping Center Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 14 Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, Lakeridge Shopping Center. 'E Owasso City Council May 15, 2012 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARING 15. The City Council will conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving citizen comments and input relating to the proposed zoning code text amendment - Small Wind Energy Systems 1.9 Mr. Karl Fritschen Attachment # 15 A public hearing will be held for the purpose of receiving comments and citizen input regarding a recommendation from City staff to amend Chapter 15, Wind Turbines, of the Owasso Zoning Code. 16. Consideration and appropriate action relating to the approval of the FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Priority Sites Mr. Roger Stevens Attachment # 16 Staff recommends approval of the proposed FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Priority Sites. 17. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a lease - purchase agreement between the City of Owasso, the Owasso Public Works Authority, and the First Bank of Owasso, for the purchase of real property located at the southwest corner of E 76th Street North and S Main Street, former site of the First Bank of Owasso. Mr. Rodney Ray Attachment # 17 Staff recommends approval of a lease- purchase agreement for the purchase of real property. 18. Report from City Manager 19. Report from City Attorney 20. Report from City Councilors 21. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen at the time of posting of the agenda) 22. Adjournment r: cc TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Juliann M. Stevens Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Citizen Request to Address the City Council DATE: May 11, 2012 REQUESTED ACTION: The City Clerk's office has received a citizen's request to address the City Council during the May 15, 2012 City Council meeting. An item has been placed on the May 15, 2012 City Council agenda in order to accommodate such request. BACKGROUND: In October of 2003, Council approved the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (see attachment C) in order to establish a policy for installation of speed humps. Implementation of the Program began January 1, 2004. The procedure summarized from the Program is the following: - Receipt of Traffic Calming Request or Application - Acknowledgment - Define the Study /problem - Collect Data /Verify Problem - Develop Plan of Traffic Calming Measure - Notification /Evidence of Support - Ranking Traffic Calming Sites In the "Collect Data /Verify Problem" step, the street segment is assessed and checked for the following criteria: - The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. - The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. - The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. - The street has more than 500 vehicles in a 24 -hour period. - The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day. If each of the criteria is met, then the project warrants the installation of a speed hump. The next step begins the petitioning process and HOA approval as outlined in the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program procedures. TRAFFIC STUDY: In 2006, 6, City staff received an application from Kristen Saint of 10102 E 95th CT N for the installation of a traffic calming device in her neighborhood. Two studies were performed at the requested location of N I O15t E Ave between E 95th CT N and E 95W ST N: a summer study on June 5, 2006 and a follow -up study during school session on October 24, 2006. In 2011, City staff received a second request from Ms. Saint for the some requested street and a study was performed on October 3, 2011. Ms. Saint was notified of the study results and the street's failure to meet the program criteria for installing a speed hump. The first two studies (2006) were performed approximately 250 feet south of the stop sign at 96th Street for N 10 1 st E Avenue. The third study (201 1) was taken approximately 450 feet south of the stop sign for 96th ST. Location of the traffic studies are shown in the following figure. The results from each study were as follows: Date Traffic Volume (vehicles per day) 85th %tile speed 6/5/06 1,287 vpd 27 mph 10/24/06 1,629 vpd 26 mph 10/3/11 896 vpd 29 mph As shown above, the traffic volume meets the criteria each time; however the 85th percentile does not meet the requirement of a minimum of 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed is defined as the speed in which the fastest 15% of vehicles are traveling at or above, or the slowest 85% of vehicles travel below this speed. ATTACHMENTS: A. Correspondence dated May 9, 2012 - Ms. Kristen Saint B. Correspondence dated October 17, 2011 - Traffic Calming Program results C. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedures Stevens Julie From: Kristen Saint .maint@eviti.cnn] Sent Wednesday, May O8.201211i53AM To: Stevens, Julie Cc: kaeind@coxnet Matt Saint Subject: Request to Address City Council Dear City Clerk, I am sending this email to request the opportunity to address the City Council concerning child safety in the Fairways at Bailey Ranch. ThenehasbeenanonguingsafetxcoocernxviththesoeedofvehkJesonN.1O1-'tE.Ave between E.o5t:Ct.N. and E 95m St. N. There are approximately 25 children under the age of 14 that play in this vicinity. In accordance with City procedure, I have filed for a Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device with the Public Works Dept. on two separate occasions. Both times, my request was denied due to what they deem to be low traffic volume. We have also had the Owasso City Police Department set up a radar trailer in the area in hopes of deterring speeding, but tonoavail. This past weekend, on May 6, around the noontime, a speeding car in this area struck our neighbor's mailbox, sending it and car parts flying up to approximately 75 feet towards my yard where my children frequently play and ride bikes. A police report was taken. I come before you now to request an appeal to the denial of the Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely Kristen L. Saint 10102E.95t»CtN. Owasso OK 74055 (918) 808-1207 Kristen.saint@eviti.com re Please note my email address domain has changed from @itapartners.com to @eviti.com, � � nTh.ity VWVit eaut Limits, y5 ; 301 West 2' Avenue P.O. Box 180 . October 17, 2011 Kristen Saint 10102 E 951h CT N Owasso, OK 74055 Subject: Notification of Failure to Meet Criteria — Traffic Calming Program Dear Ms. Saint: The City of Owasso would like to thank you for your participation in the Traffic Calming Program. We have received your application and have completed a thorough evaluation of your requested street segment. The assessment included: • Speed limit posted • Average daily traffic • Average speed of traffic • 85th Percentile speed of traffic • Street size, length, width • Obstacles(As described in criteria) preventing installation of Speed Hum p /Stop Sign Unfortunately, upon final completion of the assessment, it has been determined that the street segment requested in your application has failed to meet the Traffic Calming Program criteria for the installation of a speed hump or a stop sign. In accordance with the current Traffic Calming Program process, the assessment of the street segment on your application will expire one year after completion of the assessment. At that time, you will be able to resubmit an application for that specific street segment. The assessment for your requested street segment was completed on 10/03/11. Please contact this office should you have any questions or would like to discuss the details of your application's evaluation. Sincerely, OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Daniel Dearing, P.E. Traffic Calming Program Administrator cc: Roger Stevens, Public Works Director (918) 272 -4959 City of Owmao FAX (918) 272 -4996 A City of Character www.cityofowassopom City of Owasso Neighborhood Program Introduction Today, because of the increased dependency of vehicles for mobility, we see a dramatic increase in vehicle speeds and daily neighborhood traffic volume on local streets. Additionally, as delay on arterials has increased, some motorists have decided to bypass the congested arterials and use neighborhood streets to get from one arterial to another or as a shortcut to their destination. When concerns regarding traffic speeds, pedestrian safety and cut - through traffic arise in residential areas, it is often frustrating for both residents and traffic engineers. Neighborhoods often request a quick fix solution such as enforcement, reduction in posted speed limits or the addition of stop signs. This type of fix often increases the pressure to implement haphazard solutions that may not be in the best interests of the neighborhood, the city or the traveling public. Traffic calming involves the application of engineering techniques to physically change the character of streets, improve pedestrian safety and encourage drivers to obey speed limits. A variety of physical devices can be used to alter the geometry of the street, along with more traditional traffic engineering techniques to slow traffic. Generally, a successful traffic calming plan is not a single device, but rather a series of integrated improvements to slow traffic and/or direct traffic to more appropriate routes. The use of traffic calming devices must be carefully documented so that they are not used inappropriately or too frequently. A four- phased procedure is typically used by which traffic calming devices are requested, evaluated for appropriateness and implemented: • Documentation of the problem and the need for traffic calming devices; • The collection of field reconnaissance and traffic study data; • Selecting the proper device to correct the problem; and • Monitoring the effectiveness of solving the problem once the device(s) are installed. It is the intention of the City of Owasso Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program to address traffic problems and concerns on local streets and applies to all residential subdivision streets in the City of Owasso. While not intended to make streets play areas for children or adults, the Program is intended to generally improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and others who travel along or across these streets. Current City Practices The residential speed limit in the City of Owasso is 25 miles per hour. Initial attempts to provide traffic calming has centered around stop sign installations to affect speeding and cut - through drivers on collector and local residential streets. Since February 1995, the city has administered the Policy of Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control. This policy sought to discourage all traffic from traveling at excessive speeds through neighborhoods. As more multi -way stop signs are installed, there are fewer and fewer reasonably spaced locations for sign installations. Additionally, stop signs have not allows been effective and may present a greater risk due to r.: � V1 Page 2 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program driver failure to stop. These guidelines provide city officials and residents with the opportunity to recommend, select, analyze and critique measures aimed at improving traffic conditions in and around local neighborhoods. Proposed Traffic Calming, Implementation Plan The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) defines traffic calming in the following manner: "Traffic calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non - motorized street users. " Depending on the specific location and the residential street classification, the purpose of traffic calming is to restore streets to their intended function to provide combinations of mobility and accessibility. Experiences in other localities have shown that traffic calming is not a program that can be implemented under strict guidelines. Various solutions are often available and a successful program depends on staff and citizens that are willing to work together toward a common goal. Recommended Practices Based on cost, ease of construction and availability of materials, the speed hump is recommended to be the primary traffic calming device for existing residential and collector streets in Owasso. In general, speed humps have been found to reduce traffic speed, volumes and accidents. In addition, they discourage through traffic from using a local street as an alternative route to inconvenient or congested arterial and collector streets. Traffic Calming_ Process Planning The traffic calming process is planned at the neighborhood level, but implemented on an uninterrupted street segment basis. Planning on a neighborhood -wide basis will help to identify if solving a problem on one street shifts it to another street. Additionally, an opportunity to plan for a comprehensive series of devices that will work together to improve the traffic operations of a neighborhood will be used. Public Involvement A successful traffic calming program must involve the public and clearly be understood by all participants. Participation by those living along the affected street and adjacent registered neighborhood associations is essential. Homeowners living along the affected street segment will be asked to complete petitions that account for their participation and either affirm or not affirm their support for the installation(s). The requester of the traffic calming device(s) will solicit the neighborhood(s) for signatures and submit the petition. Additionally, registered homeowner associations that are directly affected will be ask to complete a statement that acknowledges adjacent streets to the traffic calmed street may see an increase in traffic and/or speed. Page 3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Funding Traffic calming measures will be funded using approved capital funds included in the annual budget. Warranted and approved traffic calming measures will be identified and prioritized for installation according to the established criteria. The application date on approved installations will serve as secondary criteria. Installation will commence and continue based on the availability of capital funding as outlined in the current and adopted budget. Authority and Scone The Director of Public Works will administer the traffic calming program. In accordance with established procedures, the Director will have responsibility to develop application forms, install or remove traffic calming devices. The effective date for the traffic calming program is January 1, 2004. u Page 4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedure • Receipt of Traffic Calming Request (Application) Requests for traffic calming measures can be made by individual residents or neighborhood associations using an application available from the Public Works Department. In addition, City staff may identify an area as a problem and a sponsor resident must be determined prior to the project proceeding forward in the manner described below. • Acknowledgment Acknowledgement will be sent to the individual (contact person) making the inquiry. That person must reside on the requested street segment within the boundaries defined on the traffic calming application. The acknowledgement will confirm that a study is underway and will indicate an anticipated completion date. Define the study area /problem To be eligible for consideration, a street must serve areas that are primarily residential. On finding that the identified street meets this standard and is eligible for traffic calming, the Public Works Department Engineering Division staff will identify the limits of the street to be subject to the study process. • Collect DataNerify Problem Engineering Division staff will commence with both data collection and review of existing operational and geometric characteristics of the street in question. Eligibility for a traffic calming installation will be verified by checking collected data to the warrants and a review of the operational and geometric characteristics of the street segment. Data to determine warrants for the installation of the speed hump will be collected by Engineering Division staff. A street will warrant traffic calming if it meets the following criteria: • The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. • The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. • The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. • The street has more than 500 vehicles in a 24 hour period. • The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day • Develop Plan of Traffic Calming Measure If the street segment meets criteria and warrants for traffic calming, a sketch plan of the proposed traffic calming measure to be utilized will be prepared by Engineering Division staff. If the requested street does not meet criteria and warrants, the requestor will be notified through the U. S. Postal Service. No further study action will be taken. Page 5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program • Notification/Evidence of Support Upon determination that a street meets the criteria for speed hump installation, the Public Works Department will notify the applicant of the status of their request. The applicant will be informed of the requirement for a support petition, verification statement and Homeowners Association endorsement. The Public Works Department will supply forms to the applicant, along with the sketch plan for the installation and a map to be used to show households and businesses that are to be included in the petition area Petition The applicant(s) or other neighborhood representatives will be required to circulate a petition before the City takes any action to implement the speed hump installation plan. A petition from adjacent residents and business owners is required. The petition must document that at least two - thirds (67 ) of all households and businesses adjacent to the project support the installation of speed humps. All properties within the affected area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication of preference (in favor or oppose) or by written statement by the contact person why a specific property was not represented. Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not account for all properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process. Verification Statement A verification statement confirming the signatures on the speed hump petition are valid and represent at least two- thirds (67 ) of the households/businesses adjacent to the project street is required from the applicant. Both property owners and renters are allowed to sign the petition. Each household and business address is entitled to one signature. If both the owner of a property and tenant submit a signature, the owner's signature will override the tenant's If the petition is found to be invalid the complainant(s) will be given an opportunity to re- process the petition and submit it a later date. If a sufficient petition cannot be obtained the City will discontinue the traffic calming efforts at the location. Homeowners Association Endorsement Registered neighborhood associations adjacent to the street segment area will be asked to sign a statement endorsing the traffic calming installation. If the subdivision does not have a homeowners association, then this endorsement is not applicable. The applicant will deliver the completed forms to the Public Works Department. Each form will be authenticated by Engineering Division staff. Ranking Traffic Calming Sites After meeting operational, geometric and general warrant criteria, traffic calming projects will be prioritized on a citywide basis. This action ensures proper allocation of city resources and it ensures an equitable process to citizens. x■ Page 6 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Projects will be ranked for funding and installation according to assigned points on the basis of: • 85th percentile speed, • 24 -hour traffic volume, • Total number of reported crashes over a two -year period, and • Proximity to special traffic generators. The street segment installation accumulating the greatest number of points will be considered to have the highest priority. Among project installations with the same rank, higher priority will be given to the application with the earliest application date subsequent to the effective date of the traffic calming program. H. Page 7 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Speed Hump Installation and Removal Criteria Speed Hump Location Considerations • The street shall provide access (via a driveway or on- street parking) to abutting residential and/or commercial properties (residential local or collector streets). Residential properties include multiple dwellings such as apartment complexes • The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. • The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. • The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. • Speed humps should not be located in a horizontal curve, on vertical curves where visibility of the hump is restricted, or on the approaches to these curves. • For speed hump installation, the street should have curb and gutter. Considerations may be given to streets without curb and gutter. In such cases, special care should be used to accommodate drainage and prevent vehicle run - arounds. • Street segment boundaries identified for traffic calming should be uninterrupted segments of street (i.e., no stop signs). If an applicant does identify a street segment with interrupted points, then the project plan may direct the existing interrupted points be removed. • Speed humps will not be located in front of a driveway or within an intersection. Speed humps shall be kept a minimum of 100 feet from the near curb line of an intersecting street. • Speed humps will not be located over manholes or adjacent to a fire hydrant. • Speed humps located near drainage inlets will be placed immediately downstream of the inlet. • Speed humps will be located as near as practical on property lines to minimize the intrusion of the speed hump on abutting property frontages. • To the extent possible, speed humps will be located near existing mid -block street lighting. • A speed hump will not be located in front of a property if the occupant objects to its placement or, in the case of multiple dwellings, if a majority of the households on the property object to its placement. Fulfillment of this requirement is the responsibility of the applicant (contact person). • The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day to qualify for speed humps. Speed Hump Spacing and Location • Speed humps will typically be placed 200 to 600 feet apart. Other spacing may be used upon based on engineering judgment. • On single short blocks (300 to 500 feet), a single speed hump will be positioned near the mid - point. • On single blocks of moderate length (500 to 1,000 feet), a two speed hump configuration at third points will be used. Page 8 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program • On very long blocks (1,000 to 1,600 feet), three speed humps will be placed on approximate quarter points. • On lengthy continuous street segments or segments comprised of a number of blocks, desirable interior speed hump spacing will be 400 to 600 feet. • A street segment or block must be at least 300 feet to qualify for speed hump installation. Speed Hump Removal • Citizens may request a street segment be reviewed for the possible removal of some or all of the existing humps. An application will be available from the Public Works Department. The affected area will be determined by Public Works Department Engineering Division staff and will include primarily those properties facing or abutting the street segment on which speed humps are located. A property will be considered part of the affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires traveling over existing speed humps requested to be removed. The removal request must originate from a resident, business, or entity whose property is within the affected segment area. The affected area will be determined by Public Works Engineering Division staff and will include primarily those properties facing or abutting the street segment on which speed humps are located. A property will be considered part of the affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires traveling over existing speed humps requested to be removed. Notification / Evidence of Support Subsequent to the application for speed hump removal on a segment, a map of the affected area will be prepared and a petition packet sent to the applicant (contact person) for documenting support for the removal. All properties within the affected area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication of preference (in favor or oppose) or by written statement by the contact person why a specific property was not represented. There must be at least a 67 percent evidence of support to further the process. Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not account for all properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process. The specific street segment indicated on the removal application will be the basis to identify the speed humps for removal. Final determination for the removal will be at the discretion of the City of Owasso Public Works Department staff. Page 9 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Based on engineering judgment, the review process may recommend removal of none, some, or all of the speed humps. Factors considered, but not limited to, are: a. Existing speed hump locations and spacing b. Stop /yield signs along the segment c. Historical and existing traffic speed and volume information d. Collision History e. Presence or absence of sidewalks, schools and parks If speed studies conducted along the requested segment or portions of the segment show the 85 h percentile speed is greater than or equal to 10 mph over the posted speed limit, then no hump removal will occur along the segment or portion of the segment represented by the study. In addition, the city reserves the right to remove any traffic calming measure that is potentially unsafe and impairs the public safety and welfare. Design Standards, Construction, and Maintenance The City of Owasso Public Works Department will prepare and maintain current design standards and installation and removal procedures for speed humps and other traffic calming devices in accordance with current design practices and criteria. Design and construction or removal of traffic calming devices along with associated pavement markings and signs will be the responsibility of the Public Works Department. Future maintenance of traffic calming devices will be the responsibility of the City of Owasso. W k Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedure Public Works receives Traffic Calming Application • Acknowledge applicant • Define study area /problem • Collect data /verify problem Letter to applicant No Warrants that requested street met? does not meet criteria Yes Close 0 Prepare sketch plan of proposed speed hump request installation • Prepare map of area to be included in petitions • Forward applicant plan, map and petition packet / Applicant completes petitions, verification form and Homeowners Association endorsement (if applicable) and returns to Public Works Department Letter to applicant No Residents that plan was not approve plan? aooroved , Yes Close • Authenticate petition and other forms request 0 Prioritize installations for funding /installation • Schedule work • Close out project a. OWASSO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, May 1, 2012 The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 in the Council Chambers at Old Central per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, April 27, 2012. IT I CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. ITEM 2 INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Warren Lehr, Assistant City Manager ITEM 3 FLAG SALUTE Councilor Cataudella led the flag salute PRESEI'IT Doug Bonebrake, Mayor Steve Cataudella, Councill Charlie Brown, Councilor Patrick Ross, Councilor I ABSENT Bryan Stovall, Vice Mayor Mayor Bonebrake presented a proclamation declaring Thursday, May 10, 2012 to be RED (Renew, Energize, and Donate) Day in the City of Owasso, I Owasso City Council May 1, 2012 ITEM 7 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA A, Approval of Minutes of the April 17, 2012 Regular Meeting B, Approval of Claims Mr. Brown requested item A be removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration, Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr, Ross to approve item R of the Consent Agenda with claims totaling $147,630.85. Also included for review were the healthcare self-insurance claims report and payroll payment report for pay period 04/21/12, Mr. Rodney Ray responded to questions relating to item ♦ Minutes, on the consent ••- ii After discussion, Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr, Ross, to approve item A, Minutes of the A 17, 2012 Regular Meeting • the consent agenda. YEA: Brown, Cataudella, Ross, Bonebrake NAY: None • i �_ 0� ITEM 9 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AWARD A BID FOR A. PAVEMENT STRIPING PROJECT Mr, Tim Doyle presented the item recommending approval to award a bid for a Pavement Striping Project to Action Safety Supply Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in the amount of $63,743.66. After discussion, Mr. Ross moved, seconded by Mr. Brown to approve the Pavement Striping Project, as recommended. YEA: Ross, Cataudella, Brown, Bonebrake NAY: one YEA: Brown, Ross, Cataudella, Bonebrake NAY: None Owasso City Council ITEM 11 REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER Mr. Roger Stevens provided a Status Report on Public Works Projects. Mr. Rodney Ray provided a report on building permits and deliv4ed the FY 2012-2013 Budget Proposals, ITEM 12 REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY lammom I= AMR H YEA: Cataudelia, Ross, Brown, Bonebrake NAY: None ;V 0 11191&%"11 Doug Bonebrake, Mayor 0 OWASSO CITY COUNCIL, OPWA, AND OPGA MINUTES OF JOINT SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY, May 8, 2012 The Owasso City Council, Owasso Public Works Authority, and Owasso Public Golf Authority m in • special meeting • Tuesday, May 8, 2012 in the Council Chambers at Old Central, 109 Birch Street, per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin boa t6 :0 PM on Friday, May 4, 2012. 1 ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order • 6:00 p.] PRESENT ABSENT Doug Bonebrake, Mayor/Chairman Charlie Brown, Councilor/Trustee Patrick Ross, Councilor /Trustee A quorum was declared present ITEM 2: Oath of Office for Ward 1 City Councilor Jeri Moberly and Ward 2 City Councilor Chris Kelley Ms. Julie Lombardi performed the Oath of Office for Ward I City Councilor Jeri Moberly and Ward 2 City Councilor Chris Kelley ITEM 3: Election of Mayor, Election of OPWA Chair, Election of OPGA Chair YEA: Ross, Brown, Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake NAY: None ITEM 4: Election of Vice Mayor, Election of OPWA Vice Chair, Election of OPGA Vice Chair Mayor Bonebrake called for a nomination for the position of Vice Mayor, OPWA Vice Ch OPGA Vice Chair. Mr. Ross moved, seconcled1by Mr. Brown to nominate Mr. Brown for Vil Mayor, OPWA Vice Chair, OPGA Vice Chair. YEA: Ross, Brown NAY: Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake .1 Motion defeated 2-3 Ms. Moberly moved, seconded • Mayor Bonebrake to nominate Mr. Kelley for Vice May OPWA Vice Chair, OPGA Vice Chair. • YEA: Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake NAY: Brown, Ross Motion carried 3-2 Owasso City Council The meeting recessed at 610 p.m. for reception honoring Councilors and newly elected officials. Meeting resumed ot6:3Op.m. Vol ITEM 5: DISCUSSION RELATING TO OPERATIONAL ITEMS A. Wind Tower Ordinance B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment -9inefy Eight C. PU[} and Rezoning -9inety D. Rno| P|of' 5tonebridge E. Rno| Plat, Lmkehd0e3hopping Center F. Annual Water Quality Report G. Ranch Creek Interceptor Engineehng Service Agreement � Warren Lehr presented each item and discussion was held. It was further explained that items A, B' C' D' E, and G will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action. ITEM 6: DISCUSSION RELATING TO CITY MANAGER ITEMS A. FY2Ol3 Street Rehabilitation Project List B. Board and Committee Appointments C. Acquisition ofo Building for Future Police Station , D. FY2Ol3 Budget Discussion E. City Manger Report Sales Tax Report |NC[)G-2O35 Transportation Plan Roger Stevens presented item /\' FY 2013 Street Rehabilitation Project List' and discussion was held. It was further explained that item A will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action. Rodney Ray and Julie Stevens presented item B' Board and Committee Appointments, and discussion was held. Rodney Ray and Dan Yancey presented item C, Acquisition of a Building for Future Police Station, and discussion was held. It was further explained that an item will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action relating to authorization for the City Manager to negotiate a purchase contract. Sherry Bishop gave an update on the Sales Tax Report. Rodney Ray presented the INCOG 2035 Transportation Plan. I Councilor Brown requested special necoQndionofHenry8odden'|000|oufhor,duhngtheMoy 15 meeting. � � Owasso City Council Councilor Brown requested special recognition of Henry Bodden, local author, during the May 15 meeting. ITEM 8: ADJOURNMENT YEA: Brown, Kelley, Ross, Moberly, Bonebrake NAY: None Motion carried 5-0. Meetina adiourned at 9:45 Q.) W t-1, MIRTOW Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount GENERAL TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /PEO 50.09 42.88 TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND/TRAILS END QUIL 50.00 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /GAHMAN 100.06 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /DOUGLAS 100.00 10.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH MILEAGE REIMB /FOWLER 35.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TREASURER PETTY CASH OC REFUND /GOODNIGHT 250.00 AEP /PSO STREET LIGHTS 15.06 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WAL -MART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 CHARLES N. ROMANS _KS GROUP - CITATIONS _RATING SUPPLIES LIFF SERVICES 258.00 214.88 280.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH PASTOWMEETING EXPENSE 10.40 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK L &M OFFICE - SUPPLIES 25.40 WAL -MART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 42.88 WAL4okART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 42.32 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELRIAN - APRIL, 2012 146.08 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 50.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH CHAMBER LUNCH- STEVENS 10.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 7.5C JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OKLA ML9N -OAMA CONFERENCE 75.00 PMORGAN CHASE BANK :ITY GARAGE RESOURCES TREASURER PETTY CASH TREASURER PETTY CASH JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERICANCHECKED, INCATTN: BILLING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JFIMORGAN CHASE BANK JAMORGAN CHASE BANK JPd*ORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK �f Page 1 OFFICE EVERYTHNG- SUPPLIES LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI :RSHIP CONFERENSE BER LUNCH- DEMPSTER E DEPOT-SUPPLIES ODS -ZIP TIES E DEPOT - SUPPLIES 3ROUND CHECKS kCTER TRNING- BULLETIN NG EXPENSE NG EXPENSE ,WORLD-ADVERTISING kCTER TRNING- BULLETIN :MORE PROG- ADVERTISIN 48.58 50.0a 414.00 10.00 6.66 33.98 59.98 2,757.64 69.41 347.41 VI T� Claims List 5/15/2012 033�� Vendor Name HUMAN RESOURCES IHR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE IA N Z SIGNS & SHIRTS, INC (CHARACTER INITIATIVE TOTAL HR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE 66.001 GENERAL GOVERNMENT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 63.38 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK HEARTLAND CONSULTING, INC CONSULTING SERVICES FY12 10,500.00 } ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 266.73 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 699.12 VERIZON WIRELESS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE EVERYTHNG- SUPPLIES 12.41 BEST BUY - BATTERIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK „ OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 95.07 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AFRICAN WASTE - REFUSE 141.64 KRISTINA KIAN KAMAS SERVICES RE: FY 13 BUDMET 1,460.00 TOTAL GENER1►L GOVERNMENT FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES 13,238.35 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL- COUPUTER 1,235.50 WAL -MART CORP SAM6 CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 11.98 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 299.29 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 150.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH INSPECTOR LICENSE 35.00 TULSA COUNTY MIS TULSA COUNTY LAND RECORDS 90.00 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,859.78 INEERING VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 76 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION CELL BILL 59 COX -CITY INTERNET SERVICE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 17 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAXWELL-PAINT 111 VERIZON WIRELESS UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 13 BEST BUY - BATTERIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 13 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 191 CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 209 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUEL'MAN - APRIL, 2012 562 • - r INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APR[ JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -SEVER BATTERY JPUDRGAN CHASE BANK COX -CITY INTERNET SERVICE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL- BACKUP TAPES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -POWER CORD VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BEST BUY - BATTERIES fl 54.16 1,550.00 422.04 17.41 76.02 14.99 Claims List 5/15/2012 fidget Unit Title I Vendor Name Payable Description _Payment Amc INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,201 RT SERVICES OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ELEV RE- INSPECTION FEE 100.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIGHTING INC-LIGHTING 187.25 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 31.69 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -OC DANCE FLOOR REP 3.97 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK LIGHTING INC- BULB /BALLAST 303.20 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JOHNSTONE- FILTERS 42.24 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 5.19 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 4.70 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -DOOR 34.98 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SOUTHWEST QRIVES -BELTS 31.60 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ROBERTSON- REPAIR 72.48 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ROBERTSON SUPPLY-PARTS 148.59 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 66.28 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK REDBUD -AIR FILTERS 50.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- EXHAUST FAN OC 83.60 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERIFLEX -FUEL LINE 336.00 BEST QUALITY ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION GUTTER REPAIR 6,026.00 BEST QUALITY ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION GUTTER REPAIR 4,624.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PENDERGRAPHS.MOKE DETECTR 382.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -KEYS 3.86 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAC SYSTEMS - REPAIR 357.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MURPHY SANITARY -SOAP 58.44 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIBERTY FLAGS -FLAGS 76.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP- REPAIR 109.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 8.70 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES 6.91 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 166.67 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 230.59 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 240.92 YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECT 525.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 19.25 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 19.25 WAL -WART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 331.74 OKLAHOMA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS TULSA DOC WORKER PROGRAM -APR 990.00 SUPPORT SERVICES 15,716.65 RY FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMMAN - APRIL, 2012 105. VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP CEMETERY ELECTRIC 35. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIPMENT -DECK BELT 69. Page 3 ., Claims List 5/15/2012 Idget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Descri CEMETERY POLICE SERVICES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART- RETURN WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE EVERYTHING -TONER MORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK GLOBALGOV- NETWORK SWITCH WALMART- SUPPLIES TREASURER PETTY CASH NARC ASSAULT COURSE MORGAN CHASE BANK CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE OWASSO FOP LODGE 4149 POLICE DEPT LEGAL DEFENSE FY12 GREEN COUNTRY INVESTIGATIONS PRE EMPLOY POLYGRAPH VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FITNESS-GYhb FEES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALNIART G2G MTG EXPENSE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PUBLICSAFET- TOWNSEND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PUBLICSAFET HUTTON JFIMIORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -TONER JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK KUM & GO- FUEUBROCK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK GLOBALGOV -MiOUSE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BASS PRO - TRAINING PISTOL JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK SOMES- UNIFORM METALS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BOTACH -BATON CAP JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- CLEANING TOTAL POLICE SERVICES POLICE COMMUNICATIONS JP'MORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- CLEANING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALM4ART- PRISONER MEALS JFWORGAN CHASE BANK DELL - PRINTER DRUNI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OLETS USER FEE TOTAL POLICE COMMUNICATIONS MAL CONTROL ANNE K. KARN 1CONSOLIDATED SPAYAND NEUTERING AT &T PHONE BILL MORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -PAINT :RIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION MORGAN CHASE BANK ABAXIS- CANINE TESTS MORGAN CHASE BANK SOUTHERN AG -FLEA REPELLEN MORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART- SUPPLIES MORGAN CHASE BANK VETDEPOT VIRBANTEL MORGAN CHASE BANK ADVANCE AUTO -GLASS WIPES Page 4 P9 EaN - 157.13 207.55 29.99 525.00 4,833.33 7,260.70 9,928.91 463.87 165.62 147.00 120.00 538.80 165.00 54.87 11.79 899.00 899.00 204.22 41.00 35.52 136.96 577.00 17.80 998.80 LIX 81. 125. 35. 450. 118. 106 21 16 115 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount ANIMAL CONTROL... JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LAQUINTA- TRAINING LODGING 55.00 VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- GLEANING 38.65 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK VIED VET-SUPPLIES 280.84 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PETSMART -CAT FOOD 72.53 28.43 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 204.06 FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 166.67 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 a FIRE SERVICES CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 VERIZON WIRELESS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 1,258.95 ELECTRIC BILL STORMISIREN 20.40 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 2.80 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES 28.43 WAL4i4RT CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 5,143.61 TOTAL RADIO- MAINTAUMT 6,312.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK UNITED - BAGGAGE FEE 25.00 STREETS JFMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYPARTS 32.98 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART SUPPLIES 327.54 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MEETING EXPENSE 76.61 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 86.07 AEP /PSO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP -CHAIN SAW REPAI 191.97 WATER PROD -HAND PUMP 33.66 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMER OVERHEAD -DOOR REPAIR 95.00 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 342.13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FITNESS -DUES 255.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 13.28 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 253.73 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 401.68 TOTAL FIRE SERVICES 9,701.45 IERIERGENCY PREPAREDNES AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 25.70 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORMISIREN 20.40 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORM SIREN 20.40 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORM SIREN 20.40 WAL4i4RT CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 14.47 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TOTAL RADIO- MAINTAUMT 6,312.00 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 6,451.38 STREETS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 3,245.63 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO LUMBER- FORM.BRDS 17.10 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 1,202.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FENCE -POLES & CAPS 523.80 AEP /PSO STREET LIGHTS 5,609.75 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WATER PROD -HAND PUMP 33.66 r, Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount STREETS... TULSA COUNTY BOCC STREET SIGNS 1,685.80 JFWORGAN CHASE BANK TULSAASPHALT, LLC ASPHALT 124.24 9.08 TULSAASPHALT, LLC ASPHALT 299.22 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 32.24 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 34.19 WIRELESS CONNECTION AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER MAIN STREET LIGHTING 1,000.00 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SILVER CREEK LIGHTING 513.00 28.89 TREASURER PETTY CASH VEHICLE TAG 37.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK HOME DEPOT-GATE OPENER 29.97 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO LUMBER - MATERIALS 25.17 UNIFORM RENTAL JI:VSORGAN CHASE BANK CNDLDTD- FLASHING LIGHTS 181.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP JRMORGAN CHASE BANK BROWN FARMS -SOD 8.00 TOTAL STREETS 15,769.14 R JPMORGAN CHASE BANK VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - EQUIPWENT ONE-SKID RENTAL 135.00 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI JFWORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK EQUIPIOENT ONE -KEYS 9.08 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ALL BATTERY-BATTERIES 107.30 VERIZON WIRELESS LOCKE SUPPLY -PARTS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 LOWES- RETURN PART JRMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYOILAND FILTER 28.89 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMIORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -PARTS 23.40 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL 37.31 MAXWELL SUPPLY - SUPPLIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 37.31 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP- REPAIR 349.16 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMER PUB WRKS - CONFERENCE 125.0G JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYTIRE SEALENT 25.85 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 1,390.02 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 JPNIORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQIUP -OIL MIX 101.76 CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 24.70 STORNWATER PARKS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIBERTY FLAGS -FLAG JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 JPWORGAN CHASE BANK LOCKE SUPPLY -PARTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- RETURN PART JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LQWES- BATTERIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ATWOODS- REPAIR SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAXWELL SUPPLY - SUPPLIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL s 457.00 1.78 1,019.15 50.42 -1.83 38.45 6.97 9.48 4.40 12.78 12.75 Page 7 Claims List 5/15/2012 Payment Amount Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description PARKS... YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES RECHARGE FOR EXTINGUISHER 20.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 65.00 OKLAHOWA WILDLIFE CONTROL, LLC BEAVER REMOVAL 150.00 DAVID'S ELECTRIC, INC. LIGHTING INSTALL 950.00 FREDRICK COSTIN JR MOWING 516.00 FREDRICK COSTIN JR MOWING 165.00 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 202.82 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC CONCRETE 169.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES-LIGHT FCjF FLAG 7.48 ROGERS COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT WATER SERVICE 128.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 12.75 OLEN-MASINGALE MOWING 650.00 OLENWASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 65.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN MASINGALE 'MOWING 650.00 OLENIMASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN VASINGALE MOWING 65.06 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 650.00 TOTAL PARKS 7,113.61 COMMUNITY CENTER JRMORGAN CHASE BANK ----------- - DOLLAR-CLEANING SUPPLIES 29.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TARGET-BINDERS/PAPER 23.26 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SCOREBOARD-NAME BADGES 15.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TUCKER JANITOR-SUPPLIES 179.15 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 134.54 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 112.75 DONALD L. TAYLOR KEYS 15.00 SAV-ON PRINTING & SIGNS LLC BUSINESS CARDS 30.00 WAYNE R. GAYLORD BALLASTS AND INSTALLATION 1,744.30 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 74.78 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SCOREBOARD SPRTS-AWARDS 40.00 FLEETCOR TECHMDLOGIES FUELMAN -APRIL, 2012 218.74 YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES FIRE EXTINGUISHER INPSPEC 314.41 -CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 50.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 2,981.43 HISTORICAL-MUSEUN* JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES-LIGHTS 11.96 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 91.38 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 25.69 TOTAL HISTORICAL MUSEUM 129.03 Page 7 .4 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title V Vendor Name P Payable Description WIRELESS B WIRELESS CONNECTION 3 38.03 •- TECHNOLOGIES r rN. N -APRIL, 2012 CITY GARAGE L LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 5 50.00 TOTAL C 145.00 'FUND GRAND TOTAL AMBULANCE - VICE : ::BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ILLINOIS A AMBULANCE REFUND ::BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF OKLAHOMA : :AMIBULANCE REFUND 5 526.74 '!::AMERICAN M CORP. : •: • SERVICES ll::ASSURANT H HEALTH R REFUND i:CLEO J JACK STAIR A AMBULANCE REFUND 1 100.00 TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICE 1 1 CITY GARAGE L LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 1 1,333.33 JFAMORGAN 6 60.08 JRMORGAN CHASE - 0 0- �JPfdORGAN CHASE BANK ' 'BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES 1 165.72 JRMORGAN • • 0 0 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK L LENOX-TOWING FEE 1 164.00 JPIWORGAN CHASE BANK C CHEV-PART 1 17.58 _ 0 3,504.9-2- 'FUND GRAND i TOTAL ��,CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL wUND GRAND TOTAL .. 4 wUND GRAND TOTAL .. 4 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description �=ELGIN STREET SWEEPER 1' l r TOTAL ' �I I HOLDINGS LIP •- / UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP :UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 30.6f JPMORGAN CHASE BANK CLASSIC CHEVROLET-PARTS 54.38:: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FRONTIER INTL-AC PARTS 1,694.07:: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK B &If OIL-PARTS RESALE 1,028.50:; IJPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLY-SHOP SUPPLIES 5.24:: :JPdMORGAN CHASE BANK •. - 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TIRE-SHOP SUPPLIES .. JPMORGAN • -PARTS RESALE AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 48.84i ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 125.38! IGIL SAURER DBA PHOENIX RECYCLING RECYCLING SERVICE 40.00 TOTAL - , 1/ FUND GRAND TOTAL 7,321.01 ' !` -S ^O OF OWASSO IIMPREST ACCOUNT WORKERS ! ' 01'.. OF OWASSO iMPREST ACCOUNT • !- -.... COMP CLAIMS 1 323.0011 11 'CITY CIF OWASSO WPREST ACCOUNT WORKERS COMP CLAIM PAYMEN 289.00 TOTAL s- - • 1' 11591.211: • I� CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT !- • PAYMEN ,UNITED SAFETY& CLAIMS INC TPAADMIN FEES FOR WORKER TOTAL WORKERS'COMP '1 ■ GRAND TOTAL 4,172.2� r a Page 9 CITY OF OWASSO HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND CLAIMS PAID PER AUTHORIZATION OF ORDINANCE #789 AS OF 5/143/12 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AETNA HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE ADMIN FEES STOP LOSS FEES HEALTHCARE DEPT TOTAL DELTA DENTAL DENTALidEDICAL SERVICE DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE ADMIN FEES DENTAL DEPT TOTAL AMOUNT 10,396.06 51,756.18 48,542.56 16,325.88 20,907.96 147,928.64 3,194.10 3,210.60 2,110.59 8,915,29 VSP VISION MEDICAL SERVICES 2,681.10 ADMIN FEES 1,275.48 VISION DEPT TOTAL 3,956.58 HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 160,400.51 CITY OF OWASSO GENERALFUND Department Payroll Expenses Total Expenses Municipal Court 4,597.64 6,579.67 Managerial 19,464.57 27,198.46 Finance 12,668.41 19,834.68 Human Resources 5,984.83 9,996.87 Community Development 10,646.70 16,339.87 Engineering 12,901.58 19,698.60 Information Systems 9,298.03 14,526.89 Support Services 6,730.28 9,529.74 Police 104,229.15 159,490.85 Central Dispatch 16,305.60 27,850.20 Animal Control 2,218.40 3,620.72 Fire 94'438.07 139,631.16 Fire -Safer Grant 9,980.22 15,749.90 • Emergency Preparedness 2,798.43 4,388.28 Streets 6,494.89 11,133.80 Stormwater /ROW Maint. 5,803.95 8,925.52 Park Maintenance 9,5b2.27 14,323.02 Community- Senior Center 3,155.94 4,891.88 Historical Museum 600.00 673.68 Economic Development 2,826.92 3,740.10 General FuAdTotal_ 340,645.88 518,123.89 Garage Fund Total 4,103.60 4,103.60 L - Ambulance Fund Total 24,586.12 24,586.12 Emergency 911 Fund Total - Stormwater Fund 27 Total Worker's Compensation Total - Strong Neighborhoods 2077.12 2,077.12 . W. CITY OF OWASSO GENERALFUND FISCAL YEAR 2011 -2012 Statement of Revenues & Expenditures As of April 30, 2012 REVENUES: Taxes Licenses & permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines & forfeits Other TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Personal services Meterials & supplies Other services Capital outlay TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS IN (OUT): Transfers in Transfers out TOTALTRANSFERS NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE (GAAP Basis) Beginning Balance Ending Balance FUND BALANCE (Budgetary Basis) Beginning Balance Ending Balance MONTH YEAR PERCENT T/1 P'�I�Tr T/� 11•Tr f�� �e�/1rT /1r �� �e�/1rT $ 1,564,032 $ 16,514,906 $ 19,631,900 84.12% 15,098 142,814 201,400 70.91% 397,076 1,314,040 2,540,926 51.71% 52,507 418,029 517,600 80.76% 65,419 604,232 910,300 66.38% 10,291 122,620 151,258 81.07% 2,104,423 79.81% 19,116,640 23,953,384 1,035,809 11, 309, 097 13, 976, 995 80.91% 62,631 632,186 747,019 84.63% 112,183 1,253,424 1,708,175 73.38% 329,0667 951,105 2,149,750 44.24% 1,539,690 76.13% 14,145,812 18,581,938 564,733 92.54% 4,970,829 5,371,446 910,339 9,776,684 11,601,600 84.27% (1,454,887) (15,185,936) (17,965,700) 84.53% (544,548) (5,409,252) (6,364,100) 85.00% 20,185 (992,654) (438,423) 3,944,512 $ 3,506,088 " D. 2,344,066 2,344,066 $ 1,905,643 $ 1,351,413 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Michele Dempster Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Workers' Compensation Settlement DATE: May 11, 2012 Reff�� In September 2011, employee David Sole incurred a work-related injury to his neck during th performance of his duties with the Fire Department. After undergoing surgery and treatment, Mr. Sole has been declared by the treating physicians to have reached maximum medical improvement, Mr, Sole has not retained legal counsel and has accepted the proposed settlement of $30,685, based on the rating provided by the treating physician of 19% to the bod as a whole. I The settlement will be paid out to Mr. Sole in a lump sum payment of $7,500 with the remaining amount being paid out over 71 weeks, WILIFION11T0 Worker's compensation settlements are funded out of the Workers' Compensation Self- Insurance Fund. Staff recommends approval and authorization for payment of the workers' compensation settlement for David Sole in the total amount of $30,685. KMVZ'♦�� Form CS -339 -B WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT Sdhd Ori&at Ald 5 copxre to Its WorkArs; Compihsation Coot 1915 NORTH STILES OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73105 -4918 Gl*r No.: 044.1 %AT COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT — SECTION 339(B) WC Code Agr4ement Detuleen Employer and Employee As To Fact Willi Relation to tin Injury and Payment of Compsfisation rPlb � two oT,Print ALL int— illinn lar iWO Full Name of Injured Employee (Claimant) David Sde Claimant's Social Security Number Name of Employer (Respondent) City of Owasso Employer's Insurance Carrier, Permit# for Court Approved Indiddual Self - Insured or Own Risk Group, Uninsured Own Riatt #16950 This'sgrtlipment is pprepargdand,4bmitted puravent to signingg belovll, tslrch !!rty affirms that they have repd am afil:cura -16 to the beat of thdir knowledge ilnd belleT,.,af conclusive, final and binding on all the partiis'*Involved; I BE FINAL, BUT MAY BE REOPENED AND REVIEWED conviction, shill be guilty of si felony. 1. It is Its b Pa reed byy and WtwVen the above named partiEs that the at (time) while in the etrtploy of the employer, causing lNe iniurfes, wn arAwkrwwn A'iaina out of the foractoinn' Cade u aays tor wnicn claimant receivea su_uu, in compensation trom the ialjury sntiWes the claimant to a compensation rate of $71 .00 for Te Impairment. FILE Date of Injury 9/19/11 of the Workers( Compensation Coble, Title 96 offtthe Oklahoma Statutes. By EVER, IF A CHANGE IN CORD TION OCCURS, THIS AGREEMENNT SHALL If O BY LAW. Any person who commift-workers compensation fraud, upon claimant sustained a compensable accidental Injury on or about m r 1 2011, following injltry (describe nature of In1/'ury) Who Mbn C rvical � n • n a r raj, and resullirt;Q,ln temporary totill dfeabi rom NIA to NLA, or a pe ofQ wee k@, or Insurance canner. The claimant's aoera vmdkl} waV be ore the mporary Total Disability and $823.00 for Permanent Partial Disag ylPermanent Partial 2. It is further agr?d that the claimant timely notified the emplo)rar, the claimant's employment was covered by theworkeP�' compenmon Ows of the state, and this Court has j risdiction In the matter. 3. As a r&sult of tFrwinjurryy thgemploy&karrier agrees to pa the clairn�nt the amount of $ 885.00 in the form of an accrLl�FWI lump scum ofd$ 8.QOQfor the period of,wal I30H and a lump Stun bonus of 00 for a total lump film of In addition to the sum of $ 1 to p at 00 perweek oorr'approximately 1 weeks, and onarfinal o 2.00, same being for perm0 ra art partidl disAbllitylpbrmanen p�artiM impiarment�oj to Whole Main Cervical S ins: And all h in ur known or un nown r in t oft for In cl n , and the ernployerhas furnistwd cla nt all reasonable and neces ry m ca s-in area men of e rQu . 4. The sum of ¢0.Q shall be deducted from thlp aettittMnt and paid to tft'claimanrs attorney purViant to the *brkets' compensation ImN of the Cath. 5. For Social Security offset purposes, and if applicable, the claimant agrees to aegapt and the employer /carrier agrees to ay a lump .sum of INIA for pdrmanent Impairment that will affect the claimant for the rest of the claimant's life. The claimant's remaining life expectancy ie_jA months. Therefore, even though paid in a lump sum, claimWt's benefit (&Wer deduction of attorney fe&$ and exp�pns %) shat, Ike considered to be 1 a month fix IA nlpnth= beginning NA. 6. The employer /carrier agues to pay all applicable court costs, and all taxies and assesatrrrnts to the Oklahom@ Tax Commission, as foliova: $.1&0.00 to the Workers' Compensaliort Court, taxed as costs In INS matter, unless previous paid; the Special Occupational Health asd Safety Tax in this sum of $230.14, representing three- fourths of one percent (0.79'/0 of the compromise settlement amount, excluding medical payments and temporary total . di-sanity com ensation; if a Court Approved OWN RISK employer or group �U- insurances ,, ociation, the Workers' Corr"r�ation Administral'pn Fund Tax in the sum Of > 13.70, representing 2'ib of the compromisib settpnt amount old, if applicable bylaw, the appropriatb Self- Insured Guaranty Fund Tax in thasum of ��Asenting 1% of the compromise settlement amount; arVJ, In addition o Other amounts, if UNINSURED, trMuW11a, Injury Trti31 Fund ass8bsrAbht in thb sum of $ NIA, representing t!% of the compromise settlement amount. David Sole C125MIA!!T bWM - PLEASE PRINT 1 8 11 S o K 7405 CLAIM 161 R C - SIG ATUR DATE - NAME OF CLAIMANT ATTORWY - PLEASE PRINT OBA R. CLAIMMT ATTORNEY - SIGIfTURE MTE City of Owaleaoa EfJPLOYER NAME - PLEASE PRINT wn R k N18 N E OF Eb1PLOYER'S CAIkRIER OR OWR RISK GROOP - PLEASE PRINT Eric L. Tabor 30!3 NAM OF EMPLOYE ICARRIER'S ATT W RWT EMPLOYER&AWMMTTORNEVESIGNATURE DATE ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT (FORM CS- 339 -B) The Workers' Compensatign Corrt, having mvimud the,evide"suramtiltsd by the porties.sppeores the above Compromise 6eltimmt, including atlamwl fees, Y*Ich Comprom*e Seltlemsnt is Incorpoested basin and made a part heaof by relerence. If a child support lien was filed in this workers' compenaetion case, for amployer /carrier @hail include the name of the ptaran a govamment agency aswrting the lien on any check for ftta�nofits to the claimant in excess of One Thousand Dallas (S1,OOD.00). ' The employcr /cirri +sail comply tvi Lthis order urilhin twenty (20) dayg from ilip fall- sterIped dote of die on1Fr. DONE this , — day of m a 201 ' Reporter's lg'ltials 9- copy hareV as maiid by U(* States rk r sri�on thwrliiiatWp sd BY ORDER OF ` dslRtoe@' errssgeottalord�sdisrl�e'pres p�tisb 3U9I1E ORCOU ADMINISTRATOR Oil d :x TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson, City Planner SUBJECT: 2025 Land Use Master Plan Amendment DATE: May 11, 2012 - - ;41 BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2012 the City of Owasso received a planned unit development /rezoning application for review and approval of a request to rezone a tract of land from OL (Office Light) and CS (Commercial Shopping) to RM (Residential Multi- family), with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay. The subject property is located south of Owasso Medical Campus and north of Owasso Market. SURROUNDING ZONING: Direction i Office Medium Medical an n i is North Commercial Owasso OM Campus South Commercial Owasso Commercial Owasso CS Market East Commercial Undeveloped Commercial Owasso West Office Medium Undeveloped Commercial Owasso Owasso Land Use Master Plan: The Owasso Land Use Master Plan (Plan) is a document representing desired future land use and transportation patterns for the physical development of the community. It serves as an adopted statement of growth policy for the city, and provides the basis for land use decisions such as zoning changes. The Plan is not meant to predict every possible scenario, but rather serve as a guide in helping to make decisions as well as offer some predictability to the public in terms of location and intensity of future uses. ANALYSIS: The proposed PUD for the 9inetyEight apartment complex is a use allowed only in the transitional category as called out in the 2025 Land Use Master Plan. The location of the subject property is between a commercial use area (Owasso Market) and a medical use area (St. Johns Owasso), but is called out as a commercial use area in the Land Use Master Plan. The location of the subject property is such that it functions as a transitional area between higher intensity commercial uses and lower intensity medical and office uses, which fits into the overall concept of the 2025 Land Use Plan. Finally, the Land Use Plan is a fluid document that periodically requires updating. It has been five years since the Plan was updated, so it is expected that amendments will occasionally benecessary. In analyzing the request, staff considered two key factors: first, what isthe highest and best use of the property, and second, b the proposed land use distribution consistent and compatible with existing development patterns in the area. The Owasso 2025 bond Use Mop calls for this area to be commercial in the future, but Rk4 (Residential Multi-family) zoning would be in compliance with the goals stated in the plan and the existing development in the area. Amending the Plan to show this area as transitional rather than commercial is appropriate in terms of the proposed multi-family zoning and use and does not appear to adversely impact the surrounding properties and in fact supports them. The Owosso Planning Commission reviewed this item at their regular meeting on May 7, 2012 and voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval. Staff recommends City Council approval of an amendment to the Land use Master Plan showing the 9inety Eight development area as transitional rat her than commercial. A. Area Map B. Zoning Map C. Land Use Ma;w I. I I �y v�� � •�YI ' I •tit t7`} at .3.et • + � ?(� ._►;; ,�1 [, live- .._.. •!t - .^ • ••....• it .r$� /.... .. .�. . "� i`irl. I!`�l . •. .. ,lid : •. : :. _ �� � -99 �s� Ill! i� EM3= MEE= m 46. A' ; TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson, City Planner SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development (PUD- 12 -01) and Rezoning - 9inetyEight DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: The City of Owasso received a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for review and approval of a development called 9inetyEight:' The 9inetyEight development proposes an apartment complex consisting of 284 -units in 21 buildings on 15.295 acres. The subject property is located along East 98th Street N and East 99th St N immediately north of the Owasso Market development and to the south of the St. Johns Owasso medical campus. The applicant also submitted a rezoning request with this PUD that would rezone the property from CS (Commercial Shopping) and OL (Office Light) to RM (Multi - Family Residential), allowing for the development of an apartment complex. SURROUNDING ZONING: Direction Zoning an A is i n North Office Medium Medical /Office Transitional City of Owasso South Commercial Commercial Commercial City of 1. Sho in CS Owasso East Commercial Commercial Commercial City of Sho in CS Owasso West Office Medium Vacant Commercial City of (OM) I I Owasso CONCEPT OF A PUD: The concept of a Planned Unit Development is to provide a creative alternative to conventional development where a particular tract is under common ownership or control and where a detailed development plan outlining the development of the tract as a unit is proposed and submitted for public review. The use of a PUD technique is a way to amend a zoning ordinance in accordance with a complete and coordinated plan of development for a larger parcel, rather than piecemeal individual changes using the variance process. ANALYSIS: The 9inetyEight development proposes a 284 -unit apartment complex on 15.295 acres, which results in a net post development density of 18.6 units per acre. The apartments are proposed as low -rise buildings three stories in height with a mixture of one and two bedroom units. The proposed PUD identifies two access points, one connecting to E 98th Street N and the other to E lOOm3t N. Garages will be provided for portion of the unds, bringing o total of 522 parking spaces for the entire development. The 9inetyEight site will provide o number ofamenities for the residents and includes large areas of open space for recreation. The provided amenities as identified in the PUD document include: o clubhouse with exercise facilities and recreation area; a pool and spa; o covered outdoor barbeque area; a fishing pond surrounded by a walking path; and gated access to the complex. The City of Owasso will provide sanitary sewer service, with water provided by Washington County Rural Water District #3. If the PU[} is approved, the applicant would provide final development plans for administrative review and oppnmo| bv City staff. PU[) applications presented to the Planning Commission and City Council are for approval of the uses, the overall plan asit relates to the immediate area, and the concept for the development. City staff published legal notice of the PUOrequest in the Owasso Reporter and mailed notices to property owners within a 300' radius of the subject property. The Owasso 2025 Land Use Master Plan identifies the subject property and its surroundings as having a future land use of commercial. An amendment to the Land Use Master Plan accompanies the request for the proposed 9intewBghfPUDdevelopment. With the change fo the Land Use Master Plan, the proposed project will be in conformance with the Land Use Master Plan. This proposal appears fobe consistent with the current and expected development of the area. Apartment complexes are often proposed in areas that are adjacent to single-family residential developments and there are concerns from neighbohng property owners. This proposal p|ooes the apartments between two established commercial and medical uses and would not require significant buffering or transitional uses. This apartment development would beo logical fit for the area with minimal impact onsurrounding properties. As the Owasso Medical Campus continues to develop, this apartment development will still be a compatible use and should not adversely affect any future or current development. This development will provide housing opportunities for employees of current and future commercial and medical uses in this area and provide the opportunity for residents to walk to work, shopping, and eating establishmdhts. PLANNING ISSUES: Future planning issues must still be considered if the PU[}isapproved. |f approved, the applicant will be required to adhere to all City of Owosso subdivision regulations and engineering requirements. According to the Owasso Zoning Code, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing any PUD application and determine the following: I l. Whether the PU[} is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 2. Whether the PUD is in harmony with the existing and expected development ofsurrounding areas 3. Whether the PUD is a unified treatment of the development possibilities of the project she 4. Whether the PUD is consistent with the stated purpose and standards of the PU[}ordinance a. To permit innovative land development while maintaining appropriate |imitationon the character and intensity of use assuring compatibility with adjoining and proximate properties; b. To permit flexibility within the development to best utilize the unique physical features of the particular site; c. To provide and preserve meaningful open space; and d. To achieve a continuity of function and design within the development This item was taken kz the TAC for review onApril 25,2lO2 and the comments from that meeting are attached. The Owosso Planning Commission reviewed this item ot their regular meeting on May 7' 2012 and voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval. III A. Area Map B. Aerial Photo C. Submitted PUD Plan D. TAC Comments 1" = 376 ft 05/02/2012 m !eF This map represents a visual display of related geographic informatiork Data provided hereorfN not a guarantee of actual field conditions: To be sure of complete accuracy please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to -dale information 9inetyEight PUD a I 11. BrIMM- In! M Submitted to: 11 M M • April 5, 2012 wv=,� 1435 East 4151 Street, Tulsa, OK 74105 Tel (918) 712-8768 • Fax (918) 712-1069 M a a 6i UMNIMM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT & CHARACTER ........................................................ ..............................3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DevelopmentArea A ................................................................................................ ..............................3 GRADING & UTILITY PLANS ................................................................................ ............................... 4 ACCESSAND CIRCULATION ................................................................................. ..............................5 SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................... ............................... 5 PUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... ..............................5 PROJECTTEAM ......................................................................................................... ..............................5 EXHIBITA ................................................................................................................ ............................... G CONCEPTUALSITE PLAN ............................................................................ ............................... G EXHIBITB ................................................................................................................ ............................... H CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ............................................................. ............................... H EXHIBITC ................................................................................................................... ..............................I BUILDING PLANS & ELEVATIONS ............................................................... ..............................I ENDOF PUD .............................................................................................................. ............................... J tk Page 2 �r )xi Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inelyEight 1 14 9inetyEight is a proposed multifamily project, submitted as a Planned Unit Development pursuant to the provisions of the Owasso Zoning Code. The proposed PUD comprise of one development area. Development Area A consists of residential dwellings in the form of 284 low-rise apartments units contained in 21 buildings. Development Area A encompasses approximately 15.29 acres. This project is located just south of Owasso Medical Campus and North of Owasso Market. The greater part of the subject property is currently zoned CS. A portion of the property along the north side where it abuts E 100`h Street North is zoned OL. A separate re-zoning application for those areas zoned OL & CS will be submitted with this PUD. Along the west side of the property, there is a strip of land approximately 50 feet in width that is zoned OL. The north side of the subject tract abuts Lot 1, Block 6 of Owasso Medical Campus, and E. 100th Street North. A west side of the subject tract abuts Lot 1, Block 3 of Owasso Medical Campus and E. 99th Street North. The south side of the property abuts E. 98t" Street North (Owasso Market). The east side of the property abuts a vacant land zoned CS. The site is currently a vacant land covered with vegetation. Section 820 of the Owasso Zoning Code states the purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) are to permit innovative land development while maintaining appropriate limitations on the character and intensity of use. Additionally, a purpose of the PUD is to permit flexibility within the development to best utilize the unique physical features of the particular site and provide and preserve meaningful open space. The proposed PUD meets and exceeds this requirement and the stated purposes of the Owasso Zoning Code. A subdivision plat will be submitted to the City of Owasso after approval of the PUD by the City Council. The platted area will establish private covenants which set forth criteria which will establish and maintain a very high quality development, and will establish aesthetic features such as nicely landscaped entries, neighborhood recreation areas and proper screening between commercial and residential uses. This PUD shall be governed by the use and development regulations of Owasso Zoning Code except as follows: V)�' I �01 , �M W. � Permitted Use: As permitted in RM, Multi-Family District, under the Owasso Zoning Code Net Development Area ................................................. 15.295 Acres (666,250.20 s.f.) Maximum Floor Area Ratio Per Lot ................................. 0.50 Minimum Building Setback: From East Property line ............................................... 20 feet From North Property line ............................................... 17.5 feet From South Property line 25 feet From West Property line .................................................. 17.5 feet Page 3 Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inetyEight Maximum Building Height ............. ............................... 50 feet (Not to exceed three stories) Minimum Landscape Buffer .......................................... 20 feet along East Property Line. 17.5 feet along North Property Line 17.5 feet along West Property Line 25 feet along South Property Line Minimum dwelling size ............................................... 700.00 Square feet Parking Ratio ............................................................ As required in Chapter 9 of the Owasso Zoning Code. XnetyEight landscaping plan will be designed to enhance the E. 100"' Street North frontage, and to create an attractive view form E. 98h and 99% Street North. The planting theme will highlight the site entries and buildings, and will utilize plant selections indigenous to North East Oklahoma that are durable and require low maintenance. All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 20 "Landscape Requirements" of the Owasso Zoning Code. The landscaped areas will be planted with trees and shrubs that meet or exceed the requirements of the Owasso Zoning Code. In order to provide security and screening from adjacent streets and properties, a 6-foot tall wood privacy fence will be installed along the southern, western and northern boundaries. Detail of the fence type and materials will be presented to City Staff for approval during the site plan review process. LIGHTING: All outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 19 "Outdoor Lighting" of the Owasso Zoning Code. TRASH CONTAINERS: Outside trash containers will be located in a designated area within the development, and will be screened from the view from the adjacent area and roadways. SIGNS: One monument sign will be located along the E. 100th Street North frontage. Additional signage and their locations will be determined during the design phase of the project. All Signage will comply with Chapter 18 "Signs" of the Owasso Zoning Code. GRADING & UTILITY PLANS During the design phase of the project, Site Grading & Utility Plans will be submitted to the City of Owasso engineering department for review and approval. The site will drain to the existing detention pond located along the southeast comer of the property. According to the preliminary data provided by the City, the detention volume for this development is provided in the pond. A drainage report and as- built topographic survey will be evaluated to verify the storage volume. All utilities are available to serve this development. Page 4 Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inetyEight Existing topography ranges from elevation 722.00 at the west property line to elevation 702.00 at the east property line. The site is not located in the 100 yr floodplain according to the FEMA FIRM map #40143 CO 137K dated August 3, 2009. There is an 8-inch water line for Washington County RWD3 located on the south side of the property. There is also a 12-inch water line on the west side of N. 129"' East Avenue that will be extended to serve this project and connect at the 8" water line. The existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line located within this property will be used to serve this development. All other utilities and communication services are available and accessible to 9inetyEight. Ingress and egress to 9inetyEight will be from both North 1006' Street North and East 98t" Street North as shown on the conceptual site plan. Construction of 9inetyEight project will commence upon receiving all required governmental permits. It anticipated that all permits are secured by the fall of 2012. A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) of Section Seventeen (17) of Township Twenty- Ir one (21) North and Range Fourteen (14) East of the Indian Base and Meridian (I.B.&M.), according to the U.S. Government Survey, thereof, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW comer of the SEA of Sec. 17, T -21 -N, R -14 -E, I.B.&M.; Thence N 0 I'l 5'46" W along the west line of said SE/4 a distance of 1050.00 feet; Thence N 88'44'33" E a distance of 658.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING being the South Comer of Lot I of Block 3 of OWASSO MEDICAL CAMPUS, a subdivision in the City of Owasso, according to the recorded Plat No. 5862, thereof-, Thence N 48'54'03" E along the easterly line of said Block 3 a distance of 1026.61 feet to the SW comer of Lot I of Block 6 of said OWASSO MEDICAL CAMPUS; Thence N 88'40'25" E a distance of 513.86 feet to the SE comer of said Lot 1 of Block 6; Thence N 01'19'35" W a distance of 240.00 feet to the NE comer of said Lot I of Block 6; Thence N 88'40'25" E along the south line of a 60 foot wide dedicated roadway as recorded in Book 7279 at Page 578, Tulsa County, for a distance of 180.53 feet; Thence S 01'19'35" E a distance of 59.69 feet; Thence S 21'10'25" W a distance of 109.16 feet; Thence S 01'19'35" E a distance of 518.93 feet; Thence S 88'38'40" W a distance of 202.84 feet; Thence S 32*53'13" W a distance of 264.23 feet; Thence S 88'44'33" W a distance of 1090.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 15.295 acres, more or less. The project design team consists of the following professionals: Developer: S & K Multifamily 12150 E. 96th Street North, Suite 200 Owasso, OK 74055 Tel: 918 376-6542 Fax: 918 272-0216 Page 5 Property Owner: Lloyd Jean Johnson Trust C/O Mark Johnson 20070 East 72d Street North Owasso, OK 74055 zmzmm�� Civil Engineer: Khoury Engineering, Inc. 1435 East 41st Street Tulsa, OK 74105 Tel (918) 712-8768 Fax (918) 712-1069 kenginc@khouryeng.com Landscape Architect Planning Design Group 5314 S. Yale Ave., Suite 710 Tulsa, OK 74135 Tel (918) 628-1255 Page 6 Elm PZEZM Architects Collective 4200 E Skelly Drive, # 750 Tulsa, OK 74135 Tel (918) 493-3362 mthomas@apid.net EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN m� ;p1m z :x d 'Y oil 0 S' KIM (P 0 lz� �� �� ` \ \/( � \\ w: ° . . � \ \��� � � »� : � � � � � � ? �� � f .: �� � .. \� /� : ME I *:4:ii: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN • Show front landscaping. Need two shade trees in front (per the street yard requirement). • Note menu board on site plan. • Make sure the drive-thru stacking requirements are accurate. • Correct the spelling of "Boxwood" in the landscape notes. • Please ensure that the site, drives and parking spaces meet the new City of Owasso parking requirements. It appears that the drive thru and queuing area does not meet these requirements. ONG- • Need a line extension to get down to this location. Fire Department- • No comments. -Ir Police- M • Need to know the voltage load. • Show east side easements to the transformer. • Use low profile plants in the front. • Show a stop sign on the west exit. ILI. L?l Y TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Karl Fritschen Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing, Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment - Small Wind Energy Systems DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: Alternative energy sources are becoming an affordable option for many homeowners, commercial businesses, and educational institutions. The "Go Green" Initiative, which was presented to the City Council in March 2010, is a document that identifies different opportunities the City should consider in an effort to conserve energy, protect the environment, and reduce its carbon footprint. This document recommended that development criteria be prepared to allow provisions for constructing small wind energy systems. Additionally, staff has received a few inquiries on the requirements for wind energy systems. With the price of fuel and energy showing no signs of abating, it is believed that these inquiries will continue, especially as the technology for wind energy continues to evolve and becomes more affordable. Considering the above, staff conducted research about wind energy systems and developed the attached requirements for the installation of small wind energy systems for both residential and commercial uses. The attached criteria, which will become a new section in Chapter 15 of the Owasso Zoning Code, were developed based on current technology. As the technology for wind energy improves, it will be important to revisit these criteria to ensure they remain current. The proposed change provides a comprehensive approach for the development of small wind energy systems and ensures that there is consistency in their construction and placement. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE OWASSO ZONING CODE: At the April 9, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting, staff presented a proposed amendment to the Owasso Zoning Code addressing small wind energy systems. The Commission suggested some changes to consider in the text language, and these were incorporated into the final attached draft. Below are the highlights of the changes made to the draft presented to the Planning Commission on April 9, 2012: Approvals will be granted through the Planning Commission as a Specific Use Permit. An analysis of the properties inside the Owasso City Limits reveals that approximately 20- 30 residential properties would qualify for a wind tower in terms of meeting the 1 acre requirement. The section discussing the installation of large commercial wind energy systems (wind farms) has been removed. A statement was added about how private covenants or deed restrictions may prohibit wind towers and that the ordinance does not preempt these. • Clarification was added as to the height of the wind tower blades in relation to nearby structures. • Provision was added that wind energy systems 15 feet in height or less would be allowed on any size lot oa long os the setback calculations are adhered to. The attached document represents the final draft of the proposed change to the Owasso Zoning Code. |f approved, this document will amend Chapter \5' Telecommunication Towers, by adding o new section 1530. Additionally, the title of Chapter 15 will be changed to read Telecommunication Towers and Small Wind Energy Systems. Some key elements of the proposed amendment include: • Minimum lot size standards • Setbacks from property lines and inhabited structures • Noise levels • Visual appearance • Permit requirements • Access control This zoning code amendment recognizes the need and proliferation of alternative energy sources and is designed to ensure that a process and procedure is in place for the safe construction of wind towers. The proposed amendment has been posted on the City's web page for approximately six weeks and this item has also been before the Owasso Economic Development Authority (DEOA). The City Council has also reviewed this item at three work sessions. As part of the amendment process, a public hearing is required to allow comments on the proposed amendment tothe zoning code. Once the public hearing b concluded, no action is necessary until the ordinance is brought fo City Council for adoption. The Owasso Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed text amendment and voted 5-0fo recommend approval fo the City Council. One suggestion made bv the Planning Commission that all wind towers shall meet all Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations has been added to the proposed new section. Ao ordinance amending Chapter l5ofthe zoning code will be brought to the June 5'20l2City Council meeting for consideration. Ul Section l530' Small Wind Energy Systems F 1530 SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS 1530.1 PURPOSE Z The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards that will protect the health, IN safety and general welfare of the public and achieve the following: • Provide design criteria that establish minimum requirements for small wind energy systems and commercial wind energy systems as defined herein to ensure the safe installation of wi towers in the City of Owasso • Promote energy savings and the use of `� dh infrastructure' 1530.2 APPLICABILITY The requirements of this ordinan .s all apply to atiAmall wind energy systems and commercial wind energy ms proposed after . ffective date of this ordinance. Wind energy syste which a required pt has been properly issued prior to the effective da a this r inance shall sot be required to meet the requirem�nhs of this or ovided, howe �. , that any such system shall be installs d functions thin 24 months of the date of the permit. Any system ?h been icy fled, but not used for two consecutive years ma of - bsequ�l used without meeting the requireme nos of this or ll ace. e -exis ystem shall be altered in any ma,pd% *t would %areas g_ree nonconformity with the requir.ments of is ordinan n .rations shall be made to a nonc forming pr - existing s during i life which exceeds 50% of its fair market value. such syste, is destroyed or damaged to the extent of %mte than g i fir mank value at the time of destruction or ■ j ■damage,. it shat not �e -re ons cted except in conformity with this ordinNcr! . k' 1530' MALL WIND E GY SY6V REQUIREMENTS A. al Height. T ot-to-exceed height of wind towers shall vary with the size of t�t. 1 1. For pr, a izes less than one acre in size the total height shall not = excee et_ 2. For property sizes between one acre and two acres, the total height shall not exceed 60 feet. 3. For property sizes between two and five acres, the total height shall not exceed 80 feet. 4. For property sizes greater than five acres, the total height shall not exceed 100 feet. B. Location. No small wind energy system shall be located in any front or side yard. C. Setbacks. 1. Property lines. A small wind enemy shall be set back from the nearest property line, public road ri way and communication and electrical line not less than the total height of the wind turbine. i 2. Inhabited Structures. A small . find energy system,� 11 be set back from the nearest inhabit structure not less t1.5 times the total height of the wind turbine. r �.1 D. Design Standards. . ■ ■ ; . 1. Monopole or FreA'and system shall be of a 2. Minim R11 min mum hell abrveafinished shed, hian = from sail qi 3. Ac 1% ground shall be c Oise. No gn of the small wind energy design without guy wires. He> or tO ersli excess Hof 30 feet in height, the of the lb we _ ent �urbine blade shall be 30 feet We and s be separated from any structure (i.e. house, Itional ele nt) not less than 1.5 times the blade height shall 1va climbing apparatus within 12 feet of the acce oors or access ways to towers and electrical equipment able. wind energy system shall exceed 60 dBA as measured at the y line or 50 dBA as measured at the nearest neighboring ding. 5. Visual AW°earance. Small wind energy systems shall be finished in a rust - resistant, non- obtrusive finish and color that is non - reflective. No small wind energy system shall be lighted unless required by the FAA. No advertising signs of any kind or nature whatsoever shall be permitted on any small wind energy system. No transmission equipment shall be installed on the tower. All equipment shall be screened with either a six foot opaque fence or with evergreen vegetation not less than six foot in height. 6. Electrical Interconnections. All electrical interconnection or distribution lines shall be underground and comply with all applicable codes and public utility requirements. 7. Signal Interference. Efforts shall be made to site small wind energy systems to reduce the likelihood of blocking or reflecting television and other communication signals. If signal interference occurs, both the small IN wind energy system owner and individual receiving interference shall make reasonable efforts to resolve the problem. No small wind energy system shall cause permanent and material interference with television or other communication signals. ON 8. Overspeed Controls. Every small it ergy system shall be equipped with both manual and automatic ove ntrols. 9. Federal Aviation Administr t' FAA). All wii wers shall meet Federal Aviation Administration (F ulations. Docu tation shall be provided that indicates the propose nd tower meets FAA tions. E. Permit Requirements. Application r a 1l wind ener y system shall be approved with a Spe %Jse Permit t ro a Planning Com ission following the procedures outli hapter 13,E dments. Applications shall include the following informat n. IF 1. Site plan. •A site plan 11 be to scased off a survey showing thee�llo�ca" ion�d the prop sed sma vn - nergy system and the locations of all,ee�i1rting Vuitaings, str nd pr y lines along with distances. �■ 2. Elet ns. Elevations shall rovided of the site drawn to scale showing the heig gonf ion of the small wind energy system and •th etgh istan MaLl.ex ing structures, buildings, electrical lines, 1.. an ert i s. .110111V .3. Engine Sp i ' tions. Standard drawings and an engineering analysis of the sys a towe�i�cluding weight capacity shall be provided. 4.S' ndation d Geotechnical. A standard foundation and anchor design a ith ing soil conditions and specifications for the soil conditions at t it I 5. Tower ecifications. Specific information on the type, size, rotor = material, rated power output, performance, safety, and noise characteristics of the system including the name and address of the manufacturer, model and serial number. 6. Safety Measures. Emergency and normal shutdown procedures shall be provided as part of the application for a wind energy system. 7. Electrical Connection. A line drawing of the electrical components of the w system in sufficient detail to establish that the installation conforms to all applicable electrical codes shall be provided along with evidence that the provider of electrical service of the property has been notified of the intent to install an interconnected electricity:generator (unless the system will not be connected to the electricity grid). 1530.5 NON USE 1. Any small wind energy system which complies with the terms of this ordinance which is not used for two years, excluding repairs, shall be removed within the following six months. Failure to remove the system shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. 2. Any small wind energy system or commer d energy system which is non- conforming and which is not used for one a x lkpg repairs, shall be removed within the following six months. Failure to remove..ie system shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. 1530.6 PRIVATE COVENANTS Private covenants or deed restrictio m hibit the ir�t�jlation of small wind energy systemsrThe City of O es not enforce p vate covenants and this ordinance shall=not0kreempt priva a covenants. 1530.7 DEFINITIONS r II ON 1. Total Height. Tlie-distance measured' rom,g[Wnnd level to the blade extended at its higQRpoint. ��` L ` Vr 2. Small Wind E � . A win ergy conversion system consisting of a wind ur ine, � $--associate ontrol or conversion electronics which l ill us man redM ' i e'consumption of utility power. 3'.04NM* dmill Rotx.ST�iat P of the windmill which includes the blades, hub, shaft. r i 4. WindA- kkTower. The supporting structure on which the rotor, turbine, and accessoreq ipmgnre mounted. 5. Commercial nergy System. A wind energy conversion system consisting of more than one wind turbine and tower; a wind energy conversion system which will be used primarily for off -site consumption of power. -rr i J � � • :RJ4�iJ r: TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Roger Stevens Public Works Director SUBJECT: FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Proposed Project Listing DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: Annually, the Capital Improvements Fund allows for the expenditure of funds to repair and /or resurface residential and non - residential roadways. Street rehabilitation sites are evaluated and selected based on a comprehensive assessment of roadway conditions. The selection process is aimed at maximizing the taxpayer's return on investment by incrgasing roadway lifecycle and minimizing future maintenance costs while enhancing overall roadway driving conditions and public safety. As in previous years, the City of Owasso desires to further maximize cost savings by partnering with Tulsa County to complete various asphalt overlay portions of the rehabilitation project. A formal request, via an Interlocal Agreement, for the use of County labor and equipment for roadway segments receiving a 2" asphalt overlay will be submitted for City Council consideration and appropriate action subsequent to approval of the FY 2012 -2013 rehabilitation priorities. PRIORITY STREET REPAIRS /MAINTENANCE IDENTIFIED: In November 2011, the Public Works staff completed an update to the city's street inventory. The data collected for the model was adjusted to reflect changes in segment conditions and a new priority listing was generated. A map depicting the location of the proposed priority sites is attached for review. The anticipated cost for the proposed street rehabilitation priorities is approximately $1.2 million and includes 4% contingency funding. PROJECT FUNDING: Funding for this project in the amount of $1 million is proposed in the FY 2012 -2013 Capital Improvements Fund budget. As you may recall, FY 2011 -2012 Street Rehabilitation bids were significantly less than the engineering estimates. Thus, staff will be recommending approximately $200,000 be carried over in July 2012 in order to fully fund this proposed project. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Council approval of the FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program priority sites. ATTACHMENTS: A. Recommended FY 2012 -2013 Street Repair Location Map B. Priority Site List C. Preventive Maintenance Guidelines and Options OkIK FPK❑ 1 2 3 4 i., 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STREET FROM TO SUBDIVISION REPAIR TYPE N 123 E AVE E 76 ST N E 76 PL N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 123 E AVE E 76 PL N E 77 ST N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 123 E AVE E 77 ST N E 77 PL N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 76 PL N N 123 E AVE N 126 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 77 ST N N 123 E AVE N 126 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 82 PL N N 118 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC ELM CREEK BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 121 E AVE E 78 ST N CUL -DE -SAC ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 82 PL N N 122 E AVE N 122 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES BASE REPAIR, MICROSURFACE E 114 ST N N 109 PL E N 110 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 110 E AVE N 111 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 111 E AVE N 112 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 112 E AVE GARNETT RD HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 98 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 99 E AVE N 100 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 110 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 102 E AVE N 103 CT E HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 103 CT E END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 98 E AVE E 97 PL N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 98 CT E E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 99 CT E E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 99 E AVE E 98 ST N E 97 PL N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 PL N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 100 E AVE E 97 PL N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 100 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 PL N N 100 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 CT N N 102 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 28 N 102 E AVE END E 97 CT N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 29 N 102 E AVE E 97 CT N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 30 N 102 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 31 N 102 E AVE E 99 ST N E 100 CT N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 32 N 102 E AVE E 100 CT N END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 33 N 100 E AVE E 99 ST N E 100 PL N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 34 N 100 E AVE E 100 PL N END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 35 E 100 PL N N 100 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 36 E 99 ST N N 100 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 37 N 103 E CT E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 38 E 100 CT N N 102 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 39 E 110 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 40 N 98 E AVE E 110 ST N E 100 PL N METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 41 E 110 PL N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 42 E 110 PL N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 43 N 99 E AVE E 110 PL N E 111 ST N METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 44 E 111 ST N MINGO RD N 99 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 45 E 108 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 46 N 98 E AVE E 108 ST N E 108 CT N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 47 N 98 E AVE E 108 CT N E 108 PL N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 48 N 98 E AVE E 108 PL N E 109 ST N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 49 E 109 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 50 E 109 ST N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 51 E 108 PL N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 52 E 108 CT N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 53 E 97 PL N N 107 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 54 N 107 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR 55 N 107 E AVE KNUCKLE EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, MICROSURFACE 56 E 96 PL N N 107 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 57 N 107 E PL E 96 PL N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 58 N 108 E AVE E 96 PL N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 59 N 108 E AVE E 98 ST N E 97 ST N EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, FOG SEAL 60 E 97 ST N N 108 E AVE N 109 E AVE EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 61 E 97 ST N N 109 E AVE N 110 E AVE EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, FOG SEAL 62 N 109 E AVE E 97 ST N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, MICROSURFACE 63 E 97 PL N N 110 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, MICROSURFACE 64 E 96 PL N N 111 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC E EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 65 E 96 PL N N 111 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC W EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 66 N 112 E AVE E 99 ST N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 67 CEDAR ST E 86 ST N E 11 ST N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 68 CEDAR ST E 11 ST N E 8 ST N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 69 E 87 ST N CEDAR ST GARNETT RD POST OFFICE BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 70 E 3 CT N ELM PL ELM ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 71 E 3 CT N ELM ST DOGWOOD ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 72 DOGWOOD ST E 3 CT N E 3 PL N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 73 E 3 PL N CEDAR ST DOGWOOD ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 74 N 149 E AVE E 91 ST N E 90 ST N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 75 N 149 E AVE E 90 ST N E 89 PL N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 76 N 149 E AVE E 89 PL N E 89 ST N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 77 N 147 E AVE S E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 78 N 148 E AVE N E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 79 N 149 E AVE E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 80 E L" PLACE E 3 ST N E 3 CT N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 81 ELM STREET E 3 ST N ;_ E 3 CT N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 82 E 3 ST N ELM PL ELM ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 83 E 3 ST N ELM ST CEDAR ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY Preventive Maintenance Types Pavement maintenance services are provided under two programs designed to preserve and repair roadways: l. Preventive Maintenance, which includes • Fog Seal • Crack Seal • Micropove/S|uny3ea| • Resurfacing/Overlay l Pavement Reconstruction Preventive maintenance, if performed before the road begins to break up, isthe most cost- effective offheh*uprogronn. Its purpose ish» extend the life of the road and fo keep iflooking and riding, os much os possible, in like-new condition. The work performed under apreventive maintenance program could include fog sealing, micropave/o|uny sealing, and resurf8oing/oveday. The purpose of any type of preventive maintenance isto stop water Mom seeping info the roadway material, which causes early break-up of the road surface. The useful life of roadways can beexfended from 20 toos much as lO0 years if, on a n*gu|odyxohedu|ld basis, small breaks are fixed and a seal coat or resurfacing is performed before severe damage m qco irs' Thir is q,\"v.Qpipbp.QcQqg 4vpd�.Lp&uj|QesPerlormedmpnsbQ`btm4hatappear to be in goo� qdditio of applying an copho|f emulsion to on existing pavement surface 0 improve sealing or waterproofing and prevent further stone loss by holding the aggregate in place. Ty picaUy' this method is recommended once the pavement life has reached five to seven years. 8y performing such mminfenonoe'the pavement |�ais expected tobee�endedbv�veyean. m m Crack SealiM m/\ method of applying a long lasting, resilient sealant in cracks and joints which iu flexible and expandable invoryinog and extreme pavement temperatures. The seakint will prevent the invasion of surface water between the layers of asphalt and sub- grade rook' thus preventing premature failures, deterioration, and potholes. By performing such maintenance, thempavement life is expected to be extended by three fo five years. M8cropave - Application of o mixture of fine aggregate with asphalt emulsion. Micropove is utilized on streets with higher traffic vo|umesm Depending on the traffic volume, this method is recommended once the pavement life has reached five to eight years. By performing such maintenance, the pavement is expected to be extended for on additional lOyears. Resurface/ Overlay - Asphalt overlay iso road-resurfacing method where m lift ofasphalt is placed on top of the existing roadway surface. Asphalt overlays are designed to extend the life of a road's dhving surface and keep roads in good condition by preventing potholes and preserving the underlying road bed structure. With preventive maintenance measures in place, the pavement life is expected to be extended for an additional l5-20years. IZ.TTTI=I- 11 When the condition ofa roadway reaches the point where preventive maintenance isnolonger cost-effective, the entire roadway must be removed and replaced. -d he City ut Limits. TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso z FROM: Rodney Ray City Manager SUBJECT: Request for Lease - Purchase of Real Property DATE: May 11, 2012 An item has been placed on the May 15, 2012 City Council agenda for consideration and appropriate action to approve the lease- purchase agreement of property located on the southwest corner of E 76th Street North and S Main Street, formerly the site of the First Bank of Owasso. Details relating to the lease- purchase agreement are being negotiated between counsel for both the city and the property owner, however are not substantially different from those discussed during the May 8, 2012 Council worksession. x Y: Notice and agenda filed in the office of t lia*nne C'erk and poste t Ay Hall at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, May 11, 2012. kR vens , epu erk AGENDA 1. Call to Order -Mayor Doug Bonebrake 2. Invocation Pastor Blake Altman of Trinity Owasso 3. Flag Salute 4. Roll Call 5. Presentation of Character Certificate to Henry Bodden Mayor Councilor Brown Mayor Bonebrake and Councilor Brown will recognize Henry Bodden for the character trait of Diligence. 6. Presentation of the Mayor's Proclamation Mayor The Mayor will present a proclamation declaring June 1 -3 as Strikes Against Cancer weekend in the City of Owasso. 7. Citizen request to address the City Council Kristen Saint Attachment #7 Ms. Saint is requesting to address the Council regarding the placement of a traffic calming device in the Fairways at Bailey Ranch in the area of N. 10 1 st East Avenue, between E. 95th Court North and E. 95th Street North. ;q�. Owasso City Council May 15, 2012 Page 2 8. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the Consent Agenda. All matters lifted under "Consent" are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Councilor may, however, remove an item from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non - debatable. A. Approval of Minutes of the May 1, 2012 Regular Meeting and the May 8, 2012 Special Meeting Attachment # 8 -A B. Approval of Claims Attachment # 8 -B C. Acknowledge receipt of the monthly budget status report Attachment # 8 -C 9. Consideration and appropridte action relating to items removed from the Consent Agenda 10. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a workers' compensation settlement Ms. Michele Dempster Attachment #10 Staff recommends City Council approval and authorization for payment of the workers' compensation settlement for David Sole in the total amount of $30,685. 11. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of an amendment to the 2025 Land Use Master Plan Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment #11 Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Land Use Master Plan. 12. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD- 12 -01) and Rezoning - 91netyEight Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 12 Staff recommends approval of the PUD for the 9inetyEight development and associated rezoning to RM (Residential Multi - Family). 13. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for re- approval of the Final Plat, Villas at Stonebridge Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 13 Staff recommends re- approval of the final plat for the Villas at Stonebridge. 14. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the Final Plat, Lakeridge Shopping Center Mr. Bronce Stephenson Attachment # 14 Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, Lakeridge Shopping Center. 'E Owasso City Council May 15, 2012 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARING 15. The City Council will conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving citizen comments and input relating to the proposed zoning code text amendment - Small Wind Energy Systems 1.9 Mr. Karl Fritschen Attachment # 15 A public hearing will be held for the purpose of receiving comments and citizen input regarding a recommendation from City staff to amend Chapter 15, Wind Turbines, of the Owasso Zoning Code. 16. Consideration and appropriate action relating to the approval of the FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Priority Sites Mr. Roger Stevens Attachment # 16 Staff recommends approval of the proposed FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Priority Sites. 17. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a lease - purchase agreement between the City of Owasso, the Owasso Public Works Authority, and the First Bank of Owasso, for the purchase of real property located at the southwest corner of E 76th Street North and S Main Street, former site of the First Bank of Owasso. Mr. Rodney Ray Attachment # 17 Staff recommends approval of a lease- purchase agreement for the purchase of real property. 18. Report from City Manager 19. Report from City Attorney 20. Report from City Councilors 21. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen at the time of posting of the agenda) 22. Adjournment r: cc TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Juliann M. Stevens Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Citizen Request to Address the City Council DATE: May 11, 2012 REQUESTED ACTION: The City Clerk's office has received a citizen's request to address the City Council during the May 15, 2012 City Council meeting. An item has been placed on the May 15, 2012 City Council agenda in order to accommodate such request. BACKGROUND: In October of 2003, Council approved the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (see attachment C) in order to establish a policy for installation of speed humps. Implementation of the Program began January 1, 2004. The procedure summarized from the Program is the following: - Receipt of Traffic Calming Request or Application - Acknowledgment - Define the Study /problem - Collect Data /Verify Problem - Develop Plan of Traffic Calming Measure - Notification /Evidence of Support - Ranking Traffic Calming Sites In the "Collect Data /Verify Problem" step, the street segment is assessed and checked for the following criteria: - The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. - The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. - The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. - The street has more than 500 vehicles in a 24 -hour period. - The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day. If each of the criteria is met, then the project warrants the installation of a speed hump. The next step begins the petitioning process and HOA approval as outlined in the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program procedures. TRAFFIC STUDY: In 2006, 6, City staff received an application from Kristen Saint of 10102 E 95th CT N for the installation of a traffic calming device in her neighborhood. Two studies were performed at the requested location of N I O15t E Ave between E 95th CT N and E 95W ST N: a summer study on June 5, 2006 and a follow -up study during school session on October 24, 2006. In 2011, City staff received a second request from Ms. Saint for the some requested street and a study was performed on October 3, 2011. Ms. Saint was notified of the study results and the street's failure to meet the program criteria for installing a speed hump. The first two studies (2006) were performed approximately 250 feet south of the stop sign at 96th Street for N 10 1 st E Avenue. The third study (201 1) was taken approximately 450 feet south of the stop sign for 96th ST. Location of the traffic studies are shown in the following figure. The results from each study were as follows: Date Traffic Volume (vehicles per day) 85th %tile speed 6/5/06 1,287 vpd 27 mph 10/24/06 1,629 vpd 26 mph 10/3/11 896 vpd 29 mph As shown above, the traffic volume meets the criteria each time; however the 85th percentile does not meet the requirement of a minimum of 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed is defined as the speed in which the fastest 15% of vehicles are traveling at or above, or the slowest 85% of vehicles travel below this speed. ATTACHMENTS: A. Correspondence dated May 9, 2012 - Ms. Kristen Saint B. Correspondence dated October 17, 2011 - Traffic Calming Program results C. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedures Stevens Julie From: Kristen Saint .maint@eviti.cnn] Sent Wednesday, May O8.201211i53AM To: Stevens, Julie Cc: kaeind@coxnet Matt Saint Subject: Request to Address City Council Dear City Clerk, I am sending this email to request the opportunity to address the City Council concerning child safety in the Fairways at Bailey Ranch. ThenehasbeenanonguingsafetxcoocernxviththesoeedofvehkJesonN.1O1-'tE.Ave between E.o5t:Ct.N. and E 95m St. N. There are approximately 25 children under the age of 14 that play in this vicinity. In accordance with City procedure, I have filed for a Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device with the Public Works Dept. on two separate occasions. Both times, my request was denied due to what they deem to be low traffic volume. We have also had the Owasso City Police Department set up a radar trailer in the area in hopes of deterring speeding, but tonoavail. This past weekend, on May 6, around the noontime, a speeding car in this area struck our neighbor's mailbox, sending it and car parts flying up to approximately 75 feet towards my yard where my children frequently play and ride bikes. A police report was taken. I come before you now to request an appeal to the denial of the Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely Kristen L. Saint 10102E.95t»CtN. Owasso OK 74055 (918) 808-1207 Kristen.saint@eviti.com re Please note my email address domain has changed from @itapartners.com to @eviti.com, � � nTh.ity VWVit eaut Limits, y5 ; 301 West 2' Avenue P.O. Box 180 . October 17, 2011 Kristen Saint 10102 E 951h CT N Owasso, OK 74055 Subject: Notification of Failure to Meet Criteria — Traffic Calming Program Dear Ms. Saint: The City of Owasso would like to thank you for your participation in the Traffic Calming Program. We have received your application and have completed a thorough evaluation of your requested street segment. The assessment included: • Speed limit posted • Average daily traffic • Average speed of traffic • 85th Percentile speed of traffic • Street size, length, width • Obstacles(As described in criteria) preventing installation of Speed Hum p /Stop Sign Unfortunately, upon final completion of the assessment, it has been determined that the street segment requested in your application has failed to meet the Traffic Calming Program criteria for the installation of a speed hump or a stop sign. In accordance with the current Traffic Calming Program process, the assessment of the street segment on your application will expire one year after completion of the assessment. At that time, you will be able to resubmit an application for that specific street segment. The assessment for your requested street segment was completed on 10/03/11. Please contact this office should you have any questions or would like to discuss the details of your application's evaluation. Sincerely, OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Daniel Dearing, P.E. Traffic Calming Program Administrator cc: Roger Stevens, Public Works Director (918) 272 -4959 City of Owmao FAX (918) 272 -4996 A City of Character www.cityofowassopom City of Owasso Neighborhood Program Introduction Today, because of the increased dependency of vehicles for mobility, we see a dramatic increase in vehicle speeds and daily neighborhood traffic volume on local streets. Additionally, as delay on arterials has increased, some motorists have decided to bypass the congested arterials and use neighborhood streets to get from one arterial to another or as a shortcut to their destination. When concerns regarding traffic speeds, pedestrian safety and cut - through traffic arise in residential areas, it is often frustrating for both residents and traffic engineers. Neighborhoods often request a quick fix solution such as enforcement, reduction in posted speed limits or the addition of stop signs. This type of fix often increases the pressure to implement haphazard solutions that may not be in the best interests of the neighborhood, the city or the traveling public. Traffic calming involves the application of engineering techniques to physically change the character of streets, improve pedestrian safety and encourage drivers to obey speed limits. A variety of physical devices can be used to alter the geometry of the street, along with more traditional traffic engineering techniques to slow traffic. Generally, a successful traffic calming plan is not a single device, but rather a series of integrated improvements to slow traffic and/or direct traffic to more appropriate routes. The use of traffic calming devices must be carefully documented so that they are not used inappropriately or too frequently. A four- phased procedure is typically used by which traffic calming devices are requested, evaluated for appropriateness and implemented: • Documentation of the problem and the need for traffic calming devices; • The collection of field reconnaissance and traffic study data; • Selecting the proper device to correct the problem; and • Monitoring the effectiveness of solving the problem once the device(s) are installed. It is the intention of the City of Owasso Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program to address traffic problems and concerns on local streets and applies to all residential subdivision streets in the City of Owasso. While not intended to make streets play areas for children or adults, the Program is intended to generally improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and others who travel along or across these streets. Current City Practices The residential speed limit in the City of Owasso is 25 miles per hour. Initial attempts to provide traffic calming has centered around stop sign installations to affect speeding and cut - through drivers on collector and local residential streets. Since February 1995, the city has administered the Policy of Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control. This policy sought to discourage all traffic from traveling at excessive speeds through neighborhoods. As more multi -way stop signs are installed, there are fewer and fewer reasonably spaced locations for sign installations. Additionally, stop signs have not allows been effective and may present a greater risk due to r.: � V1 Page 2 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program driver failure to stop. These guidelines provide city officials and residents with the opportunity to recommend, select, analyze and critique measures aimed at improving traffic conditions in and around local neighborhoods. Proposed Traffic Calming, Implementation Plan The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) defines traffic calming in the following manner: "Traffic calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non - motorized street users. " Depending on the specific location and the residential street classification, the purpose of traffic calming is to restore streets to their intended function to provide combinations of mobility and accessibility. Experiences in other localities have shown that traffic calming is not a program that can be implemented under strict guidelines. Various solutions are often available and a successful program depends on staff and citizens that are willing to work together toward a common goal. Recommended Practices Based on cost, ease of construction and availability of materials, the speed hump is recommended to be the primary traffic calming device for existing residential and collector streets in Owasso. In general, speed humps have been found to reduce traffic speed, volumes and accidents. In addition, they discourage through traffic from using a local street as an alternative route to inconvenient or congested arterial and collector streets. Traffic Calming_ Process Planning The traffic calming process is planned at the neighborhood level, but implemented on an uninterrupted street segment basis. Planning on a neighborhood -wide basis will help to identify if solving a problem on one street shifts it to another street. Additionally, an opportunity to plan for a comprehensive series of devices that will work together to improve the traffic operations of a neighborhood will be used. Public Involvement A successful traffic calming program must involve the public and clearly be understood by all participants. Participation by those living along the affected street and adjacent registered neighborhood associations is essential. Homeowners living along the affected street segment will be asked to complete petitions that account for their participation and either affirm or not affirm their support for the installation(s). The requester of the traffic calming device(s) will solicit the neighborhood(s) for signatures and submit the petition. Additionally, registered homeowner associations that are directly affected will be ask to complete a statement that acknowledges adjacent streets to the traffic calmed street may see an increase in traffic and/or speed. Page 3 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Funding Traffic calming measures will be funded using approved capital funds included in the annual budget. Warranted and approved traffic calming measures will be identified and prioritized for installation according to the established criteria. The application date on approved installations will serve as secondary criteria. Installation will commence and continue based on the availability of capital funding as outlined in the current and adopted budget. Authority and Scone The Director of Public Works will administer the traffic calming program. In accordance with established procedures, the Director will have responsibility to develop application forms, install or remove traffic calming devices. The effective date for the traffic calming program is January 1, 2004. u Page 4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedure • Receipt of Traffic Calming Request (Application) Requests for traffic calming measures can be made by individual residents or neighborhood associations using an application available from the Public Works Department. In addition, City staff may identify an area as a problem and a sponsor resident must be determined prior to the project proceeding forward in the manner described below. • Acknowledgment Acknowledgement will be sent to the individual (contact person) making the inquiry. That person must reside on the requested street segment within the boundaries defined on the traffic calming application. The acknowledgement will confirm that a study is underway and will indicate an anticipated completion date. Define the study area /problem To be eligible for consideration, a street must serve areas that are primarily residential. On finding that the identified street meets this standard and is eligible for traffic calming, the Public Works Department Engineering Division staff will identify the limits of the street to be subject to the study process. • Collect DataNerify Problem Engineering Division staff will commence with both data collection and review of existing operational and geometric characteristics of the street in question. Eligibility for a traffic calming installation will be verified by checking collected data to the warrants and a review of the operational and geometric characteristics of the street segment. Data to determine warrants for the installation of the speed hump will be collected by Engineering Division staff. A street will warrant traffic calming if it meets the following criteria: • The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. • The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. • The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. • The street has more than 500 vehicles in a 24 hour period. • The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day • Develop Plan of Traffic Calming Measure If the street segment meets criteria and warrants for traffic calming, a sketch plan of the proposed traffic calming measure to be utilized will be prepared by Engineering Division staff. If the requested street does not meet criteria and warrants, the requestor will be notified through the U. S. Postal Service. No further study action will be taken. Page 5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program • Notification/Evidence of Support Upon determination that a street meets the criteria for speed hump installation, the Public Works Department will notify the applicant of the status of their request. The applicant will be informed of the requirement for a support petition, verification statement and Homeowners Association endorsement. The Public Works Department will supply forms to the applicant, along with the sketch plan for the installation and a map to be used to show households and businesses that are to be included in the petition area Petition The applicant(s) or other neighborhood representatives will be required to circulate a petition before the City takes any action to implement the speed hump installation plan. A petition from adjacent residents and business owners is required. The petition must document that at least two - thirds (67 ) of all households and businesses adjacent to the project support the installation of speed humps. All properties within the affected area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication of preference (in favor or oppose) or by written statement by the contact person why a specific property was not represented. Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not account for all properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process. Verification Statement A verification statement confirming the signatures on the speed hump petition are valid and represent at least two- thirds (67 ) of the households/businesses adjacent to the project street is required from the applicant. Both property owners and renters are allowed to sign the petition. Each household and business address is entitled to one signature. If both the owner of a property and tenant submit a signature, the owner's signature will override the tenant's If the petition is found to be invalid the complainant(s) will be given an opportunity to re- process the petition and submit it a later date. If a sufficient petition cannot be obtained the City will discontinue the traffic calming efforts at the location. Homeowners Association Endorsement Registered neighborhood associations adjacent to the street segment area will be asked to sign a statement endorsing the traffic calming installation. If the subdivision does not have a homeowners association, then this endorsement is not applicable. The applicant will deliver the completed forms to the Public Works Department. Each form will be authenticated by Engineering Division staff. Ranking Traffic Calming Sites After meeting operational, geometric and general warrant criteria, traffic calming projects will be prioritized on a citywide basis. This action ensures proper allocation of city resources and it ensures an equitable process to citizens. x■ Page 6 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Projects will be ranked for funding and installation according to assigned points on the basis of: • 85th percentile speed, • 24 -hour traffic volume, • Total number of reported crashes over a two -year period, and • Proximity to special traffic generators. The street segment installation accumulating the greatest number of points will be considered to have the highest priority. Among project installations with the same rank, higher priority will be given to the application with the earliest application date subsequent to the effective date of the traffic calming program. H. Page 7 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Speed Hump Installation and Removal Criteria Speed Hump Location Considerations • The street shall provide access (via a driveway or on- street parking) to abutting residential and/or commercial properties (residential local or collector streets). Residential properties include multiple dwellings such as apartment complexes • The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction. • The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less. • The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the regulatory speed limit. • Speed humps should not be located in a horizontal curve, on vertical curves where visibility of the hump is restricted, or on the approaches to these curves. • For speed hump installation, the street should have curb and gutter. Considerations may be given to streets without curb and gutter. In such cases, special care should be used to accommodate drainage and prevent vehicle run - arounds. • Street segment boundaries identified for traffic calming should be uninterrupted segments of street (i.e., no stop signs). If an applicant does identify a street segment with interrupted points, then the project plan may direct the existing interrupted points be removed. • Speed humps will not be located in front of a driveway or within an intersection. Speed humps shall be kept a minimum of 100 feet from the near curb line of an intersecting street. • Speed humps will not be located over manholes or adjacent to a fire hydrant. • Speed humps located near drainage inlets will be placed immediately downstream of the inlet. • Speed humps will be located as near as practical on property lines to minimize the intrusion of the speed hump on abutting property frontages. • To the extent possible, speed humps will be located near existing mid -block street lighting. • A speed hump will not be located in front of a property if the occupant objects to its placement or, in the case of multiple dwellings, if a majority of the households on the property object to its placement. Fulfillment of this requirement is the responsibility of the applicant (contact person). • The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day to qualify for speed humps. Speed Hump Spacing and Location • Speed humps will typically be placed 200 to 600 feet apart. Other spacing may be used upon based on engineering judgment. • On single short blocks (300 to 500 feet), a single speed hump will be positioned near the mid - point. • On single blocks of moderate length (500 to 1,000 feet), a two speed hump configuration at third points will be used. Page 8 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program • On very long blocks (1,000 to 1,600 feet), three speed humps will be placed on approximate quarter points. • On lengthy continuous street segments or segments comprised of a number of blocks, desirable interior speed hump spacing will be 400 to 600 feet. • A street segment or block must be at least 300 feet to qualify for speed hump installation. Speed Hump Removal • Citizens may request a street segment be reviewed for the possible removal of some or all of the existing humps. An application will be available from the Public Works Department. The affected area will be determined by Public Works Department Engineering Division staff and will include primarily those properties facing or abutting the street segment on which speed humps are located. A property will be considered part of the affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires traveling over existing speed humps requested to be removed. The removal request must originate from a resident, business, or entity whose property is within the affected segment area. The affected area will be determined by Public Works Engineering Division staff and will include primarily those properties facing or abutting the street segment on which speed humps are located. A property will be considered part of the affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires traveling over existing speed humps requested to be removed. Notification / Evidence of Support Subsequent to the application for speed hump removal on a segment, a map of the affected area will be prepared and a petition packet sent to the applicant (contact person) for documenting support for the removal. All properties within the affected area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication of preference (in favor or oppose) or by written statement by the contact person why a specific property was not represented. There must be at least a 67 percent evidence of support to further the process. Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not account for all properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process. The specific street segment indicated on the removal application will be the basis to identify the speed humps for removal. Final determination for the removal will be at the discretion of the City of Owasso Public Works Department staff. Page 9 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Based on engineering judgment, the review process may recommend removal of none, some, or all of the speed humps. Factors considered, but not limited to, are: a. Existing speed hump locations and spacing b. Stop /yield signs along the segment c. Historical and existing traffic speed and volume information d. Collision History e. Presence or absence of sidewalks, schools and parks If speed studies conducted along the requested segment or portions of the segment show the 85 h percentile speed is greater than or equal to 10 mph over the posted speed limit, then no hump removal will occur along the segment or portion of the segment represented by the study. In addition, the city reserves the right to remove any traffic calming measure that is potentially unsafe and impairs the public safety and welfare. Design Standards, Construction, and Maintenance The City of Owasso Public Works Department will prepare and maintain current design standards and installation and removal procedures for speed humps and other traffic calming devices in accordance with current design practices and criteria. Design and construction or removal of traffic calming devices along with associated pavement markings and signs will be the responsibility of the Public Works Department. Future maintenance of traffic calming devices will be the responsibility of the City of Owasso. W k Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedure Public Works receives Traffic Calming Application • Acknowledge applicant • Define study area /problem • Collect data /verify problem Letter to applicant No Warrants that requested street met? does not meet criteria Yes Close 0 Prepare sketch plan of proposed speed hump request installation • Prepare map of area to be included in petitions • Forward applicant plan, map and petition packet / Applicant completes petitions, verification form and Homeowners Association endorsement (if applicable) and returns to Public Works Department Letter to applicant No Residents that plan was not approve plan? aooroved , Yes Close • Authenticate petition and other forms request 0 Prioritize installations for funding /installation • Schedule work • Close out project a. OWASSO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, May 1, 2012 The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 in the Council Chambers at Old Central per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, April 27, 2012. IT I CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. ITEM 2 INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Warren Lehr, Assistant City Manager ITEM 3 FLAG SALUTE Councilor Cataudella led the flag salute PRESEI'IT Doug Bonebrake, Mayor Steve Cataudella, Councill Charlie Brown, Councilor Patrick Ross, Councilor I ABSENT Bryan Stovall, Vice Mayor Mayor Bonebrake presented a proclamation declaring Thursday, May 10, 2012 to be RED (Renew, Energize, and Donate) Day in the City of Owasso, I Owasso City Council May 1, 2012 ITEM 7 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA A, Approval of Minutes of the April 17, 2012 Regular Meeting B, Approval of Claims Mr. Brown requested item A be removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration, Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr, Ross to approve item R of the Consent Agenda with claims totaling $147,630.85. Also included for review were the healthcare self-insurance claims report and payroll payment report for pay period 04/21/12, Mr. Rodney Ray responded to questions relating to item ♦ Minutes, on the consent ••- ii After discussion, Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr, Ross, to approve item A, Minutes of the A 17, 2012 Regular Meeting • the consent agenda. YEA: Brown, Cataudella, Ross, Bonebrake NAY: None • i �_ 0� ITEM 9 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AWARD A BID FOR A. PAVEMENT STRIPING PROJECT Mr, Tim Doyle presented the item recommending approval to award a bid for a Pavement Striping Project to Action Safety Supply Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in the amount of $63,743.66. After discussion, Mr. Ross moved, seconded by Mr. Brown to approve the Pavement Striping Project, as recommended. YEA: Ross, Cataudella, Brown, Bonebrake NAY: one YEA: Brown, Ross, Cataudella, Bonebrake NAY: None Owasso City Council ITEM 11 REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER Mr. Roger Stevens provided a Status Report on Public Works Projects. Mr. Rodney Ray provided a report on building permits and deliv4ed the FY 2012-2013 Budget Proposals, ITEM 12 REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY lammom I= AMR H YEA: Cataudelia, Ross, Brown, Bonebrake NAY: None ;V 0 11191&%"11 Doug Bonebrake, Mayor 0 OWASSO CITY COUNCIL, OPWA, AND OPGA MINUTES OF JOINT SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY, May 8, 2012 The Owasso City Council, Owasso Public Works Authority, and Owasso Public Golf Authority m in • special meeting • Tuesday, May 8, 2012 in the Council Chambers at Old Central, 109 Birch Street, per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin boa t6 :0 PM on Friday, May 4, 2012. 1 ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order • 6:00 p.] PRESENT ABSENT Doug Bonebrake, Mayor/Chairman Charlie Brown, Councilor/Trustee Patrick Ross, Councilor /Trustee A quorum was declared present ITEM 2: Oath of Office for Ward 1 City Councilor Jeri Moberly and Ward 2 City Councilor Chris Kelley Ms. Julie Lombardi performed the Oath of Office for Ward I City Councilor Jeri Moberly and Ward 2 City Councilor Chris Kelley ITEM 3: Election of Mayor, Election of OPWA Chair, Election of OPGA Chair YEA: Ross, Brown, Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake NAY: None ITEM 4: Election of Vice Mayor, Election of OPWA Vice Chair, Election of OPGA Vice Chair Mayor Bonebrake called for a nomination for the position of Vice Mayor, OPWA Vice Ch OPGA Vice Chair. Mr. Ross moved, seconcled1by Mr. Brown to nominate Mr. Brown for Vil Mayor, OPWA Vice Chair, OPGA Vice Chair. YEA: Ross, Brown NAY: Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake .1 Motion defeated 2-3 Ms. Moberly moved, seconded • Mayor Bonebrake to nominate Mr. Kelley for Vice May OPWA Vice Chair, OPGA Vice Chair. • YEA: Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake NAY: Brown, Ross Motion carried 3-2 Owasso City Council The meeting recessed at 610 p.m. for reception honoring Councilors and newly elected officials. Meeting resumed ot6:3Op.m. Vol ITEM 5: DISCUSSION RELATING TO OPERATIONAL ITEMS A. Wind Tower Ordinance B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment -9inefy Eight C. PU[} and Rezoning -9inety D. Rno| P|of' 5tonebridge E. Rno| Plat, Lmkehd0e3hopping Center F. Annual Water Quality Report G. Ranch Creek Interceptor Engineehng Service Agreement � Warren Lehr presented each item and discussion was held. It was further explained that items A, B' C' D' E, and G will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action. ITEM 6: DISCUSSION RELATING TO CITY MANAGER ITEMS A. FY2Ol3 Street Rehabilitation Project List B. Board and Committee Appointments C. Acquisition ofo Building for Future Police Station , D. FY2Ol3 Budget Discussion E. City Manger Report Sales Tax Report |NC[)G-2O35 Transportation Plan Roger Stevens presented item /\' FY 2013 Street Rehabilitation Project List' and discussion was held. It was further explained that item A will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action. Rodney Ray and Julie Stevens presented item B' Board and Committee Appointments, and discussion was held. Rodney Ray and Dan Yancey presented item C, Acquisition of a Building for Future Police Station, and discussion was held. It was further explained that an item will be placed on the May 15 agenda for consideration and appropriate action relating to authorization for the City Manager to negotiate a purchase contract. Sherry Bishop gave an update on the Sales Tax Report. Rodney Ray presented the INCOG 2035 Transportation Plan. I Councilor Brown requested special necoQndionofHenry8odden'|000|oufhor,duhngtheMoy 15 meeting. � � Owasso City Council Councilor Brown requested special recognition of Henry Bodden, local author, during the May 15 meeting. ITEM 8: ADJOURNMENT YEA: Brown, Kelley, Ross, Moberly, Bonebrake NAY: None Motion carried 5-0. Meetina adiourned at 9:45 Q.) W t-1, MIRTOW Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount GENERAL TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /PEO 50.09 42.88 TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND/TRAILS END QUIL 50.00 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /GAHMAN 100.06 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI TREASURER PETTY CASH CC REFUND /DOUGLAS 100.00 10.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH MILEAGE REIMB /FOWLER 35.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TREASURER PETTY CASH OC REFUND /GOODNIGHT 250.00 AEP /PSO STREET LIGHTS 15.06 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WAL -MART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 CHARLES N. ROMANS _KS GROUP - CITATIONS _RATING SUPPLIES LIFF SERVICES 258.00 214.88 280.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH PASTOWMEETING EXPENSE 10.40 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK L &M OFFICE - SUPPLIES 25.40 WAL -MART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 42.88 WAL4okART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 42.32 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELRIAN - APRIL, 2012 146.08 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 50.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH CHAMBER LUNCH- STEVENS 10.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 7.5C JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OKLA ML9N -OAMA CONFERENCE 75.00 PMORGAN CHASE BANK :ITY GARAGE RESOURCES TREASURER PETTY CASH TREASURER PETTY CASH JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERICANCHECKED, INCATTN: BILLING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JFIMORGAN CHASE BANK JAMORGAN CHASE BANK JPd*ORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK �f Page 1 OFFICE EVERYTHNG- SUPPLIES LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI :RSHIP CONFERENSE BER LUNCH- DEMPSTER E DEPOT-SUPPLIES ODS -ZIP TIES E DEPOT - SUPPLIES 3ROUND CHECKS kCTER TRNING- BULLETIN NG EXPENSE NG EXPENSE ,WORLD-ADVERTISING kCTER TRNING- BULLETIN :MORE PROG- ADVERTISIN 48.58 50.0a 414.00 10.00 6.66 33.98 59.98 2,757.64 69.41 347.41 VI T� Claims List 5/15/2012 033�� Vendor Name HUMAN RESOURCES IHR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE IA N Z SIGNS & SHIRTS, INC (CHARACTER INITIATIVE TOTAL HR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE 66.001 GENERAL GOVERNMENT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 63.38 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK HEARTLAND CONSULTING, INC CONSULTING SERVICES FY12 10,500.00 } ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 266.73 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 699.12 VERIZON WIRELESS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE EVERYTHNG- SUPPLIES 12.41 BEST BUY - BATTERIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK „ OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 95.07 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AFRICAN WASTE - REFUSE 141.64 KRISTINA KIAN KAMAS SERVICES RE: FY 13 BUDMET 1,460.00 TOTAL GENER1►L GOVERNMENT FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES 13,238.35 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL- COUPUTER 1,235.50 WAL -MART CORP SAM6 CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 11.98 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 299.29 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 150.00 TREASURER PETTY CASH INSPECTOR LICENSE 35.00 TULSA COUNTY MIS TULSA COUNTY LAND RECORDS 90.00 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,859.78 INEERING VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 76 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION CELL BILL 59 COX -CITY INTERNET SERVICE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 17 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAXWELL-PAINT 111 VERIZON WIRELESS UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 13 BEST BUY - BATTERIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 13 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 191 CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 209 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUEL'MAN - APRIL, 2012 562 • - r INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APR[ JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -SEVER BATTERY JPUDRGAN CHASE BANK COX -CITY INTERNET SERVICE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL- BACKUP TAPES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -POWER CORD VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BEST BUY - BATTERIES fl 54.16 1,550.00 422.04 17.41 76.02 14.99 Claims List 5/15/2012 fidget Unit Title I Vendor Name Payable Description _Payment Amc INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,201 RT SERVICES OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ELEV RE- INSPECTION FEE 100.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIGHTING INC-LIGHTING 187.25 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 31.69 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -OC DANCE FLOOR REP 3.97 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK LIGHTING INC- BULB /BALLAST 303.20 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JOHNSTONE- FILTERS 42.24 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 5.19 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 4.70 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -DOOR 34.98 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SOUTHWEST QRIVES -BELTS 31.60 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ROBERTSON- REPAIR 72.48 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ROBERTSON SUPPLY-PARTS 148.59 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 66.28 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK REDBUD -AIR FILTERS 50.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- EXHAUST FAN OC 83.60 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERIFLEX -FUEL LINE 336.00 BEST QUALITY ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION GUTTER REPAIR 6,026.00 BEST QUALITY ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION GUTTER REPAIR 4,624.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PENDERGRAPHS.MOKE DETECTR 382.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -KEYS 3.86 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAC SYSTEMS - REPAIR 357.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MURPHY SANITARY -SOAP 58.44 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIBERTY FLAGS -FLAGS 76.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP- REPAIR 109.52 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 8.70 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES 6.91 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 166.67 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 230.59 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 240.92 YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECT 525.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 19.25 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 19.25 WAL -WART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 331.74 OKLAHOMA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS TULSA DOC WORKER PROGRAM -APR 990.00 SUPPORT SERVICES 15,716.65 RY FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMMAN - APRIL, 2012 105. VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP CEMETERY ELECTRIC 35. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIPMENT -DECK BELT 69. Page 3 ., Claims List 5/15/2012 Idget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Descri CEMETERY POLICE SERVICES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART- RETURN WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE EVERYTHING -TONER MORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK GLOBALGOV- NETWORK SWITCH WALMART- SUPPLIES TREASURER PETTY CASH NARC ASSAULT COURSE MORGAN CHASE BANK CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE OWASSO FOP LODGE 4149 POLICE DEPT LEGAL DEFENSE FY12 GREEN COUNTRY INVESTIGATIONS PRE EMPLOY POLYGRAPH VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FITNESS-GYhb FEES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALNIART G2G MTG EXPENSE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PUBLICSAFET- TOWNSEND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PUBLICSAFET HUTTON JFIMIORGAN CHASE BANK DELL -TONER JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK KUM & GO- FUEUBROCK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK GLOBALGOV -MiOUSE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BASS PRO - TRAINING PISTOL JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK SOMES- UNIFORM METALS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK BOTACH -BATON CAP JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- CLEANING TOTAL POLICE SERVICES POLICE COMMUNICATIONS JP'MORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- CLEANING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALM4ART- PRISONER MEALS JFWORGAN CHASE BANK DELL - PRINTER DRUNI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OLETS USER FEE TOTAL POLICE COMMUNICATIONS MAL CONTROL ANNE K. KARN 1CONSOLIDATED SPAYAND NEUTERING AT &T PHONE BILL MORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -PAINT :RIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION MORGAN CHASE BANK ABAXIS- CANINE TESTS MORGAN CHASE BANK SOUTHERN AG -FLEA REPELLEN MORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART- SUPPLIES MORGAN CHASE BANK VETDEPOT VIRBANTEL MORGAN CHASE BANK ADVANCE AUTO -GLASS WIPES Page 4 P9 EaN - 157.13 207.55 29.99 525.00 4,833.33 7,260.70 9,928.91 463.87 165.62 147.00 120.00 538.80 165.00 54.87 11.79 899.00 899.00 204.22 41.00 35.52 136.96 577.00 17.80 998.80 LIX 81. 125. 35. 450. 118. 106 21 16 115 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount ANIMAL CONTROL... JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LAQUINTA- TRAINING LODGING 55.00 VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DRY CLEANING ST- GLEANING 38.65 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK VIED VET-SUPPLIES 280.84 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PETSMART -CAT FOOD 72.53 28.43 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 204.06 FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 166.67 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 a FIRE SERVICES CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 VERIZON WIRELESS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 1,258.95 ELECTRIC BILL STORMISIREN 20.40 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK PIKEPASS -PIKE PASS FEE 2.80 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES 28.43 WAL4i4RT CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 5,143.61 TOTAL RADIO- MAINTAUMT 6,312.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK UNITED - BAGGAGE FEE 25.00 STREETS JFMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYPARTS 32.98 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WALMART SUPPLIES 327.54 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MEETING EXPENSE 76.61 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES 86.07 AEP /PSO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP -CHAIN SAW REPAI 191.97 WATER PROD -HAND PUMP 33.66 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMER OVERHEAD -DOOR REPAIR 95.00 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 342.13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FITNESS -DUES 255.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 13.28 AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 253.73 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 401.68 TOTAL FIRE SERVICES 9,701.45 IERIERGENCY PREPAREDNES AT &T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 25.70 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORMISIREN 20.40 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORM SIREN 20.40 VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC BILL STORM SIREN 20.40 WAL4i4RT CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608 OPERATING SUPPLIES 14.47 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TOTAL RADIO- MAINTAUMT 6,312.00 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 6,451.38 STREETS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 3,245.63 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO LUMBER- FORM.BRDS 17.10 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 1,202.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO FENCE -POLES & CAPS 523.80 AEP /PSO STREET LIGHTS 5,609.75 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK WATER PROD -HAND PUMP 33.66 r, Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount STREETS... TULSA COUNTY BOCC STREET SIGNS 1,685.80 JFWORGAN CHASE BANK TULSAASPHALT, LLC ASPHALT 124.24 9.08 TULSAASPHALT, LLC ASPHALT 299.22 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 32.24 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 34.19 WIRELESS CONNECTION AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER MAIN STREET LIGHTING 1,000.00 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SILVER CREEK LIGHTING 513.00 28.89 TREASURER PETTY CASH VEHICLE TAG 37.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK HOME DEPOT-GATE OPENER 29.97 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OWASSO LUMBER - MATERIALS 25.17 UNIFORM RENTAL JI:VSORGAN CHASE BANK CNDLDTD- FLASHING LIGHTS 181.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP JRMORGAN CHASE BANK BROWN FARMS -SOD 8.00 TOTAL STREETS 15,769.14 R JPMORGAN CHASE BANK VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - EQUIPWENT ONE-SKID RENTAL 135.00 LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI JFWORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK EQUIPIOENT ONE -KEYS 9.08 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ALL BATTERY-BATTERIES 107.30 VERIZON WIRELESS LOCKE SUPPLY -PARTS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 LOWES- RETURN PART JRMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYOILAND FILTER 28.89 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK JPMIORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES -PARTS 23.40 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL 37.31 MAXWELL SUPPLY - SUPPLIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 37.31 JRMORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQUIP- REPAIR 349.16 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AMER PUB WRKS - CONFERENCE 125.0G JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLYTIRE SEALENT 25.85 FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 1,390.02 CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG -APRI 1,166.67 JPNIORGAN CHASE BANK P &K EQIUP -OIL MIX 101.76 CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - 24.70 STORNWATER PARKS CITY GARAGE VEH PARTS & OUTSIDE REP - CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIBERTY FLAGS -FLAG JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES FUELMAN - APRIL, 2012 JPWORGAN CHASE BANK LOCKE SUPPLY -PARTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- RETURN PART JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LQWES- BATTERIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ATWOODS- REPAIR SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- REPAIR SUPPLIES JPMORGAN CHASE BANK MAXWELL SUPPLY - SUPPLIES UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL s 457.00 1.78 1,019.15 50.42 -1.83 38.45 6.97 9.48 4.40 12.78 12.75 Page 7 Claims List 5/15/2012 Payment Amount Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description PARKS... YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES RECHARGE FOR EXTINGUISHER 20.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 65.00 OKLAHOWA WILDLIFE CONTROL, LLC BEAVER REMOVAL 150.00 DAVID'S ELECTRIC, INC. LIGHTING INSTALL 950.00 FREDRICK COSTIN JR MOWING 516.00 FREDRICK COSTIN JR MOWING 165.00 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 202.82 VERIZON WIRELESS WIRELESS CONNECTION 38.01 SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC CONCRETE 169.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES-LIGHT FCjF FLAG 7.48 ROGERS COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT WATER SERVICE 128.00 UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP UNIFORM RENTAL 12.75 OLEN-MASINGALE MOWING 650.00 OLENWASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 65.00 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN MASINGALE 'MOWING 650.00 OLENIMASINGALE MOWING 210.00 OLEN VASINGALE MOWING 65.06 OLEN MASINGALE MOWING 650.00 TOTAL PARKS 7,113.61 COMMUNITY CENTER JRMORGAN CHASE BANK ----------- - DOLLAR-CLEANING SUPPLIES 29.50 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TARGET-BINDERS/PAPER 23.26 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SCOREBOARD-NAME BADGES 15.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TUCKER JANITOR-SUPPLIES 179.15 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 134.54 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 112.75 DONALD L. TAYLOR KEYS 15.00 SAV-ON PRINTING & SIGNS LLC BUSINESS CARDS 30.00 WAYNE R. GAYLORD BALLASTS AND INSTALLATION 1,744.30 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES 74.78 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK SCOREBOARD SPRTS-AWARDS 40.00 FLEETCOR TECHMDLOGIES FUELMAN -APRIL, 2012 218.74 YOUNGS FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES FIRE EXTINGUISHER INPSPEC 314.41 -CITY GARAGE LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 50.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 2,981.43 HISTORICAL-MUSEUN* JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES-LIGHTS 11.96 ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 91.38 AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 25.69 TOTAL HISTORICAL MUSEUM 129.03 Page 7 .4 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title V Vendor Name P Payable Description WIRELESS B WIRELESS CONNECTION 3 38.03 •- TECHNOLOGIES r rN. N -APRIL, 2012 CITY GARAGE L LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 5 50.00 TOTAL C 145.00 'FUND GRAND TOTAL AMBULANCE - VICE : ::BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ILLINOIS A AMBULANCE REFUND ::BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF OKLAHOMA : :AMIBULANCE REFUND 5 526.74 '!::AMERICAN M CORP. : •: • SERVICES ll::ASSURANT H HEALTH R REFUND i:CLEO J JACK STAIR A AMBULANCE REFUND 1 100.00 TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICE 1 1 CITY GARAGE L LABOR/OVERHEAD CHG - APRI 1 1,333.33 JFAMORGAN 6 60.08 JRMORGAN CHASE - 0 0- �JPfdORGAN CHASE BANK ' 'BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES 1 165.72 JRMORGAN • • 0 0 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK L LENOX-TOWING FEE 1 164.00 JPIWORGAN CHASE BANK C CHEV-PART 1 17.58 _ 0 3,504.9-2- 'FUND GRAND i TOTAL ��,CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL wUND GRAND TOTAL .. 4 wUND GRAND TOTAL .. 4 Claims List 5/15/2012 Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description �=ELGIN STREET SWEEPER 1' l r TOTAL ' �I I HOLDINGS LIP •- / UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP :UNIFORM RENTAL FEES 30.6f JPMORGAN CHASE BANK CLASSIC CHEVROLET-PARTS 54.38:: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FRONTIER INTL-AC PARTS 1,694.07:: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK B &If OIL-PARTS RESALE 1,028.50:; IJPMORGAN CHASE BANK OREILLY-SHOP SUPPLIES 5.24:: :JPdMORGAN CHASE BANK •. - 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TIRE-SHOP SUPPLIES .. JPMORGAN • -PARTS RESALE AT&T CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL 48.84i ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 125.38! IGIL SAURER DBA PHOENIX RECYCLING RECYCLING SERVICE 40.00 TOTAL - , 1/ FUND GRAND TOTAL 7,321.01 ' !` -S ^O OF OWASSO IIMPREST ACCOUNT WORKERS ! ' 01'.. OF OWASSO iMPREST ACCOUNT • !- -.... COMP CLAIMS 1 323.0011 11 'CITY CIF OWASSO WPREST ACCOUNT WORKERS COMP CLAIM PAYMEN 289.00 TOTAL s- - • 1' 11591.211: • I� CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT !- • PAYMEN ,UNITED SAFETY& CLAIMS INC TPAADMIN FEES FOR WORKER TOTAL WORKERS'COMP '1 ■ GRAND TOTAL 4,172.2� r a Page 9 CITY OF OWASSO HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND CLAIMS PAID PER AUTHORIZATION OF ORDINANCE #789 AS OF 5/143/12 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AETNA HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE ADMIN FEES STOP LOSS FEES HEALTHCARE DEPT TOTAL DELTA DENTAL DENTALidEDICAL SERVICE DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE ADMIN FEES DENTAL DEPT TOTAL AMOUNT 10,396.06 51,756.18 48,542.56 16,325.88 20,907.96 147,928.64 3,194.10 3,210.60 2,110.59 8,915,29 VSP VISION MEDICAL SERVICES 2,681.10 ADMIN FEES 1,275.48 VISION DEPT TOTAL 3,956.58 HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 160,400.51 CITY OF OWASSO GENERALFUND Department Payroll Expenses Total Expenses Municipal Court 4,597.64 6,579.67 Managerial 19,464.57 27,198.46 Finance 12,668.41 19,834.68 Human Resources 5,984.83 9,996.87 Community Development 10,646.70 16,339.87 Engineering 12,901.58 19,698.60 Information Systems 9,298.03 14,526.89 Support Services 6,730.28 9,529.74 Police 104,229.15 159,490.85 Central Dispatch 16,305.60 27,850.20 Animal Control 2,218.40 3,620.72 Fire 94'438.07 139,631.16 Fire -Safer Grant 9,980.22 15,749.90 • Emergency Preparedness 2,798.43 4,388.28 Streets 6,494.89 11,133.80 Stormwater /ROW Maint. 5,803.95 8,925.52 Park Maintenance 9,5b2.27 14,323.02 Community- Senior Center 3,155.94 4,891.88 Historical Museum 600.00 673.68 Economic Development 2,826.92 3,740.10 General FuAdTotal_ 340,645.88 518,123.89 Garage Fund Total 4,103.60 4,103.60 L - Ambulance Fund Total 24,586.12 24,586.12 Emergency 911 Fund Total - Stormwater Fund 27 Total Worker's Compensation Total - Strong Neighborhoods 2077.12 2,077.12 . W. CITY OF OWASSO GENERALFUND FISCAL YEAR 2011 -2012 Statement of Revenues & Expenditures As of April 30, 2012 REVENUES: Taxes Licenses & permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines & forfeits Other TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Personal services Meterials & supplies Other services Capital outlay TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS IN (OUT): Transfers in Transfers out TOTALTRANSFERS NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE (GAAP Basis) Beginning Balance Ending Balance FUND BALANCE (Budgetary Basis) Beginning Balance Ending Balance MONTH YEAR PERCENT T/1 P'�I�Tr T/� 11•Tr f�� �e�/1rT /1r �� �e�/1rT $ 1,564,032 $ 16,514,906 $ 19,631,900 84.12% 15,098 142,814 201,400 70.91% 397,076 1,314,040 2,540,926 51.71% 52,507 418,029 517,600 80.76% 65,419 604,232 910,300 66.38% 10,291 122,620 151,258 81.07% 2,104,423 79.81% 19,116,640 23,953,384 1,035,809 11, 309, 097 13, 976, 995 80.91% 62,631 632,186 747,019 84.63% 112,183 1,253,424 1,708,175 73.38% 329,0667 951,105 2,149,750 44.24% 1,539,690 76.13% 14,145,812 18,581,938 564,733 92.54% 4,970,829 5,371,446 910,339 9,776,684 11,601,600 84.27% (1,454,887) (15,185,936) (17,965,700) 84.53% (544,548) (5,409,252) (6,364,100) 85.00% 20,185 (992,654) (438,423) 3,944,512 $ 3,506,088 " D. 2,344,066 2,344,066 $ 1,905,643 $ 1,351,413 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Michele Dempster Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Workers' Compensation Settlement DATE: May 11, 2012 Reff�� In September 2011, employee David Sole incurred a work-related injury to his neck during th performance of his duties with the Fire Department. After undergoing surgery and treatment, Mr. Sole has been declared by the treating physicians to have reached maximum medical improvement, Mr, Sole has not retained legal counsel and has accepted the proposed settlement of $30,685, based on the rating provided by the treating physician of 19% to the bod as a whole. I The settlement will be paid out to Mr. Sole in a lump sum payment of $7,500 with the remaining amount being paid out over 71 weeks, WILIFION11T0 Worker's compensation settlements are funded out of the Workers' Compensation Self- Insurance Fund. Staff recommends approval and authorization for payment of the workers' compensation settlement for David Sole in the total amount of $30,685. KMVZ'♦�� Form CS -339 -B WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT Sdhd Ori&at Ald 5 copxre to Its WorkArs; Compihsation Coot 1915 NORTH STILES OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73105 -4918 Gl*r No.: 044.1 %AT COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT — SECTION 339(B) WC Code Agr4ement Detuleen Employer and Employee As To Fact Willi Relation to tin Injury and Payment of Compsfisation rPlb � two oT,Print ALL int— illinn lar iWO Full Name of Injured Employee (Claimant) David Sde Claimant's Social Security Number Name of Employer (Respondent) City of Owasso Employer's Insurance Carrier, Permit# for Court Approved Indiddual Self - Insured or Own Risk Group, Uninsured Own Riatt #16950 This'sgrtlipment is pprepargdand,4bmitted puravent to signingg belovll, tslrch !!rty affirms that they have repd am afil:cura -16 to the beat of thdir knowledge ilnd belleT,.,af conclusive, final and binding on all the partiis'*Involved; I BE FINAL, BUT MAY BE REOPENED AND REVIEWED conviction, shill be guilty of si felony. 1. It is Its b Pa reed byy and WtwVen the above named partiEs that the at (time) while in the etrtploy of the employer, causing lNe iniurfes, wn arAwkrwwn A'iaina out of the foractoinn' Cade u aays tor wnicn claimant receivea su_uu, in compensation trom the ialjury sntiWes the claimant to a compensation rate of $71 .00 for Te Impairment. FILE Date of Injury 9/19/11 of the Workers( Compensation Coble, Title 96 offtthe Oklahoma Statutes. By EVER, IF A CHANGE IN CORD TION OCCURS, THIS AGREEMENNT SHALL If O BY LAW. Any person who commift-workers compensation fraud, upon claimant sustained a compensable accidental Injury on or about m r 1 2011, following injltry (describe nature of In1/'ury) Who Mbn C rvical � n • n a r raj, and resullirt;Q,ln temporary totill dfeabi rom NIA to NLA, or a pe ofQ wee k@, or Insurance canner. The claimant's aoera vmdkl} waV be ore the mporary Total Disability and $823.00 for Permanent Partial Disag ylPermanent Partial 2. It is further agr?d that the claimant timely notified the emplo)rar, the claimant's employment was covered by theworkeP�' compenmon Ows of the state, and this Court has j risdiction In the matter. 3. As a r&sult of tFrwinjurryy thgemploy&karrier agrees to pa the clairn�nt the amount of $ 885.00 in the form of an accrLl�FWI lump scum ofd$ 8.QOQfor the period of,wal I30H and a lump Stun bonus of 00 for a total lump film of In addition to the sum of $ 1 to p at 00 perweek oorr'approximately 1 weeks, and onarfinal o 2.00, same being for perm0 ra art partidl disAbllitylpbrmanen p�artiM impiarment�oj to Whole Main Cervical S ins: And all h in ur known or un nown r in t oft for In cl n , and the ernployerhas furnistwd cla nt all reasonable and neces ry m ca s-in area men of e rQu . 4. The sum of ¢0.Q shall be deducted from thlp aettittMnt and paid to tft'claimanrs attorney purViant to the *brkets' compensation ImN of the Cath. 5. For Social Security offset purposes, and if applicable, the claimant agrees to aegapt and the employer /carrier agrees to ay a lump .sum of INIA for pdrmanent Impairment that will affect the claimant for the rest of the claimant's life. The claimant's remaining life expectancy ie_jA months. Therefore, even though paid in a lump sum, claimWt's benefit (&Wer deduction of attorney fe&$ and exp�pns %) shat, Ike considered to be 1 a month fix IA nlpnth= beginning NA. 6. The employer /carrier agues to pay all applicable court costs, and all taxies and assesatrrrnts to the Oklahom@ Tax Commission, as foliova: $.1&0.00 to the Workers' Compensaliort Court, taxed as costs In INS matter, unless previous paid; the Special Occupational Health asd Safety Tax in this sum of $230.14, representing three- fourths of one percent (0.79'/0 of the compromise settlement amount, excluding medical payments and temporary total . di-sanity com ensation; if a Court Approved OWN RISK employer or group �U- insurances ,, ociation, the Workers' Corr"r�ation Administral'pn Fund Tax in the sum Of > 13.70, representing 2'ib of the compromisib settpnt amount old, if applicable bylaw, the appropriatb Self- Insured Guaranty Fund Tax in thasum of ��Asenting 1% of the compromise settlement amount; arVJ, In addition o Other amounts, if UNINSURED, trMuW11a, Injury Trti31 Fund ass8bsrAbht in thb sum of $ NIA, representing t!% of the compromise settlement amount. David Sole C125MIA!!T bWM - PLEASE PRINT 1 8 11 S o K 7405 CLAIM 161 R C - SIG ATUR DATE - NAME OF CLAIMANT ATTORWY - PLEASE PRINT OBA R. CLAIMMT ATTORNEY - SIGIfTURE MTE City of Owaleaoa EfJPLOYER NAME - PLEASE PRINT wn R k N18 N E OF Eb1PLOYER'S CAIkRIER OR OWR RISK GROOP - PLEASE PRINT Eric L. Tabor 30!3 NAM OF EMPLOYE ICARRIER'S ATT W RWT EMPLOYER&AWMMTTORNEVESIGNATURE DATE ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT (FORM CS- 339 -B) The Workers' Compensatign Corrt, having mvimud the,evide"suramtiltsd by the porties.sppeores the above Compromise 6eltimmt, including atlamwl fees, Y*Ich Comprom*e Seltlemsnt is Incorpoested basin and made a part heaof by relerence. If a child support lien was filed in this workers' compenaetion case, for amployer /carrier @hail include the name of the ptaran a govamment agency aswrting the lien on any check for ftta�nofits to the claimant in excess of One Thousand Dallas (S1,OOD.00). ' The employcr /cirri +sail comply tvi Lthis order urilhin twenty (20) dayg from ilip fall- sterIped dote of die on1Fr. DONE this , — day of m a 201 ' Reporter's lg'ltials 9- copy hareV as maiid by U(* States rk r sri�on thwrliiiatWp sd BY ORDER OF ` dslRtoe@' errssgeottalord�sdisrl�e'pres p�tisb 3U9I1E ORCOU ADMINISTRATOR Oil d :x TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson, City Planner SUBJECT: 2025 Land Use Master Plan Amendment DATE: May 11, 2012 - - ;41 BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2012 the City of Owasso received a planned unit development /rezoning application for review and approval of a request to rezone a tract of land from OL (Office Light) and CS (Commercial Shopping) to RM (Residential Multi- family), with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay. The subject property is located south of Owasso Medical Campus and north of Owasso Market. SURROUNDING ZONING: Direction i Office Medium Medical an n i is North Commercial Owasso OM Campus South Commercial Owasso Commercial Owasso CS Market East Commercial Undeveloped Commercial Owasso West Office Medium Undeveloped Commercial Owasso Owasso Land Use Master Plan: The Owasso Land Use Master Plan (Plan) is a document representing desired future land use and transportation patterns for the physical development of the community. It serves as an adopted statement of growth policy for the city, and provides the basis for land use decisions such as zoning changes. The Plan is not meant to predict every possible scenario, but rather serve as a guide in helping to make decisions as well as offer some predictability to the public in terms of location and intensity of future uses. ANALYSIS: The proposed PUD for the 9inetyEight apartment complex is a use allowed only in the transitional category as called out in the 2025 Land Use Master Plan. The location of the subject property is between a commercial use area (Owasso Market) and a medical use area (St. Johns Owasso), but is called out as a commercial use area in the Land Use Master Plan. The location of the subject property is such that it functions as a transitional area between higher intensity commercial uses and lower intensity medical and office uses, which fits into the overall concept of the 2025 Land Use Plan. Finally, the Land Use Plan is a fluid document that periodically requires updating. It has been five years since the Plan was updated, so it is expected that amendments will occasionally benecessary. In analyzing the request, staff considered two key factors: first, what isthe highest and best use of the property, and second, b the proposed land use distribution consistent and compatible with existing development patterns in the area. The Owasso 2025 bond Use Mop calls for this area to be commercial in the future, but Rk4 (Residential Multi-family) zoning would be in compliance with the goals stated in the plan and the existing development in the area. Amending the Plan to show this area as transitional rather than commercial is appropriate in terms of the proposed multi-family zoning and use and does not appear to adversely impact the surrounding properties and in fact supports them. The Owosso Planning Commission reviewed this item at their regular meeting on May 7, 2012 and voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval. Staff recommends City Council approval of an amendment to the Land use Master Plan showing the 9inety Eight development area as transitional rat her than commercial. A. Area Map B. Zoning Map C. Land Use Ma;w I. I I �y v�� � •�YI ' I •tit t7`} at .3.et • + � ?(� ._►;; ,�1 [, live- .._.. •!t - .^ • ••....• it .r$� /.... .. .�. . "� i`irl. I!`�l . •. .. ,lid : •. : :. _ �� � -99 �s� Ill! i� EM3= MEE= m 46. A' ; TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson, City Planner SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development (PUD- 12 -01) and Rezoning - 9inetyEight DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: The City of Owasso received a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for review and approval of a development called 9inetyEight:' The 9inetyEight development proposes an apartment complex consisting of 284 -units in 21 buildings on 15.295 acres. The subject property is located along East 98th Street N and East 99th St N immediately north of the Owasso Market development and to the south of the St. Johns Owasso medical campus. The applicant also submitted a rezoning request with this PUD that would rezone the property from CS (Commercial Shopping) and OL (Office Light) to RM (Multi - Family Residential), allowing for the development of an apartment complex. SURROUNDING ZONING: Direction Zoning an A is i n North Office Medium Medical /Office Transitional City of Owasso South Commercial Commercial Commercial City of 1. Sho in CS Owasso East Commercial Commercial Commercial City of Sho in CS Owasso West Office Medium Vacant Commercial City of (OM) I I Owasso CONCEPT OF A PUD: The concept of a Planned Unit Development is to provide a creative alternative to conventional development where a particular tract is under common ownership or control and where a detailed development plan outlining the development of the tract as a unit is proposed and submitted for public review. The use of a PUD technique is a way to amend a zoning ordinance in accordance with a complete and coordinated plan of development for a larger parcel, rather than piecemeal individual changes using the variance process. ANALYSIS: The 9inetyEight development proposes a 284 -unit apartment complex on 15.295 acres, which results in a net post development density of 18.6 units per acre. The apartments are proposed as low -rise buildings three stories in height with a mixture of one and two bedroom units. The proposed PUD identifies two access points, one connecting to E 98th Street N and the other to E lOOm3t N. Garages will be provided for portion of the unds, bringing o total of 522 parking spaces for the entire development. The 9inetyEight site will provide o number ofamenities for the residents and includes large areas of open space for recreation. The provided amenities as identified in the PUD document include: o clubhouse with exercise facilities and recreation area; a pool and spa; o covered outdoor barbeque area; a fishing pond surrounded by a walking path; and gated access to the complex. The City of Owasso will provide sanitary sewer service, with water provided by Washington County Rural Water District #3. If the PU[} is approved, the applicant would provide final development plans for administrative review and oppnmo| bv City staff. PU[) applications presented to the Planning Commission and City Council are for approval of the uses, the overall plan asit relates to the immediate area, and the concept for the development. City staff published legal notice of the PUOrequest in the Owasso Reporter and mailed notices to property owners within a 300' radius of the subject property. The Owasso 2025 Land Use Master Plan identifies the subject property and its surroundings as having a future land use of commercial. An amendment to the Land Use Master Plan accompanies the request for the proposed 9intewBghfPUDdevelopment. With the change fo the Land Use Master Plan, the proposed project will be in conformance with the Land Use Master Plan. This proposal appears fobe consistent with the current and expected development of the area. Apartment complexes are often proposed in areas that are adjacent to single-family residential developments and there are concerns from neighbohng property owners. This proposal p|ooes the apartments between two established commercial and medical uses and would not require significant buffering or transitional uses. This apartment development would beo logical fit for the area with minimal impact onsurrounding properties. As the Owasso Medical Campus continues to develop, this apartment development will still be a compatible use and should not adversely affect any future or current development. This development will provide housing opportunities for employees of current and future commercial and medical uses in this area and provide the opportunity for residents to walk to work, shopping, and eating establishmdhts. PLANNING ISSUES: Future planning issues must still be considered if the PU[}isapproved. |f approved, the applicant will be required to adhere to all City of Owosso subdivision regulations and engineering requirements. According to the Owasso Zoning Code, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing any PUD application and determine the following: I l. Whether the PU[} is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 2. Whether the PUD is in harmony with the existing and expected development ofsurrounding areas 3. Whether the PUD is a unified treatment of the development possibilities of the project she 4. Whether the PUD is consistent with the stated purpose and standards of the PU[}ordinance a. To permit innovative land development while maintaining appropriate |imitationon the character and intensity of use assuring compatibility with adjoining and proximate properties; b. To permit flexibility within the development to best utilize the unique physical features of the particular site; c. To provide and preserve meaningful open space; and d. To achieve a continuity of function and design within the development This item was taken kz the TAC for review onApril 25,2lO2 and the comments from that meeting are attached. The Owosso Planning Commission reviewed this item ot their regular meeting on May 7' 2012 and voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval. III A. Area Map B. Aerial Photo C. Submitted PUD Plan D. TAC Comments 1" = 376 ft 05/02/2012 m !eF This map represents a visual display of related geographic informatiork Data provided hereorfN not a guarantee of actual field conditions: To be sure of complete accuracy please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to -dale information 9inetyEight PUD a I 11. BrIMM- In! M Submitted to: 11 M M • April 5, 2012 wv=,� 1435 East 4151 Street, Tulsa, OK 74105 Tel (918) 712-8768 • Fax (918) 712-1069 M a a 6i UMNIMM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT & CHARACTER ........................................................ ..............................3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DevelopmentArea A ................................................................................................ ..............................3 GRADING & UTILITY PLANS ................................................................................ ............................... 4 ACCESSAND CIRCULATION ................................................................................. ..............................5 SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................... ............................... 5 PUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... ..............................5 PROJECTTEAM ......................................................................................................... ..............................5 EXHIBITA ................................................................................................................ ............................... G CONCEPTUALSITE PLAN ............................................................................ ............................... G EXHIBITB ................................................................................................................ ............................... H CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ............................................................. ............................... H EXHIBITC ................................................................................................................... ..............................I BUILDING PLANS & ELEVATIONS ............................................................... ..............................I ENDOF PUD .............................................................................................................. ............................... J tk Page 2 �r )xi Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inelyEight 1 14 9inetyEight is a proposed multifamily project, submitted as a Planned Unit Development pursuant to the provisions of the Owasso Zoning Code. The proposed PUD comprise of one development area. Development Area A consists of residential dwellings in the form of 284 low-rise apartments units contained in 21 buildings. Development Area A encompasses approximately 15.29 acres. This project is located just south of Owasso Medical Campus and North of Owasso Market. The greater part of the subject property is currently zoned CS. A portion of the property along the north side where it abuts E 100`h Street North is zoned OL. A separate re-zoning application for those areas zoned OL & CS will be submitted with this PUD. Along the west side of the property, there is a strip of land approximately 50 feet in width that is zoned OL. The north side of the subject tract abuts Lot 1, Block 6 of Owasso Medical Campus, and E. 100th Street North. A west side of the subject tract abuts Lot 1, Block 3 of Owasso Medical Campus and E. 99th Street North. The south side of the property abuts E. 98t" Street North (Owasso Market). The east side of the property abuts a vacant land zoned CS. The site is currently a vacant land covered with vegetation. Section 820 of the Owasso Zoning Code states the purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) are to permit innovative land development while maintaining appropriate limitations on the character and intensity of use. Additionally, a purpose of the PUD is to permit flexibility within the development to best utilize the unique physical features of the particular site and provide and preserve meaningful open space. The proposed PUD meets and exceeds this requirement and the stated purposes of the Owasso Zoning Code. A subdivision plat will be submitted to the City of Owasso after approval of the PUD by the City Council. The platted area will establish private covenants which set forth criteria which will establish and maintain a very high quality development, and will establish aesthetic features such as nicely landscaped entries, neighborhood recreation areas and proper screening between commercial and residential uses. This PUD shall be governed by the use and development regulations of Owasso Zoning Code except as follows: V)�' I �01 , �M W. � Permitted Use: As permitted in RM, Multi-Family District, under the Owasso Zoning Code Net Development Area ................................................. 15.295 Acres (666,250.20 s.f.) Maximum Floor Area Ratio Per Lot ................................. 0.50 Minimum Building Setback: From East Property line ............................................... 20 feet From North Property line ............................................... 17.5 feet From South Property line 25 feet From West Property line .................................................. 17.5 feet Page 3 Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inetyEight Maximum Building Height ............. ............................... 50 feet (Not to exceed three stories) Minimum Landscape Buffer .......................................... 20 feet along East Property Line. 17.5 feet along North Property Line 17.5 feet along West Property Line 25 feet along South Property Line Minimum dwelling size ............................................... 700.00 Square feet Parking Ratio ............................................................ As required in Chapter 9 of the Owasso Zoning Code. XnetyEight landscaping plan will be designed to enhance the E. 100"' Street North frontage, and to create an attractive view form E. 98h and 99% Street North. The planting theme will highlight the site entries and buildings, and will utilize plant selections indigenous to North East Oklahoma that are durable and require low maintenance. All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 20 "Landscape Requirements" of the Owasso Zoning Code. The landscaped areas will be planted with trees and shrubs that meet or exceed the requirements of the Owasso Zoning Code. In order to provide security and screening from adjacent streets and properties, a 6-foot tall wood privacy fence will be installed along the southern, western and northern boundaries. Detail of the fence type and materials will be presented to City Staff for approval during the site plan review process. LIGHTING: All outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 19 "Outdoor Lighting" of the Owasso Zoning Code. TRASH CONTAINERS: Outside trash containers will be located in a designated area within the development, and will be screened from the view from the adjacent area and roadways. SIGNS: One monument sign will be located along the E. 100th Street North frontage. Additional signage and their locations will be determined during the design phase of the project. All Signage will comply with Chapter 18 "Signs" of the Owasso Zoning Code. GRADING & UTILITY PLANS During the design phase of the project, Site Grading & Utility Plans will be submitted to the City of Owasso engineering department for review and approval. The site will drain to the existing detention pond located along the southeast comer of the property. According to the preliminary data provided by the City, the detention volume for this development is provided in the pond. A drainage report and as- built topographic survey will be evaluated to verify the storage volume. All utilities are available to serve this development. Page 4 Khoury Engineering, Inc. 9inetyEight Existing topography ranges from elevation 722.00 at the west property line to elevation 702.00 at the east property line. The site is not located in the 100 yr floodplain according to the FEMA FIRM map #40143 CO 137K dated August 3, 2009. There is an 8-inch water line for Washington County RWD3 located on the south side of the property. There is also a 12-inch water line on the west side of N. 129"' East Avenue that will be extended to serve this project and connect at the 8" water line. The existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line located within this property will be used to serve this development. All other utilities and communication services are available and accessible to 9inetyEight. Ingress and egress to 9inetyEight will be from both North 1006' Street North and East 98t" Street North as shown on the conceptual site plan. Construction of 9inetyEight project will commence upon receiving all required governmental permits. It anticipated that all permits are secured by the fall of 2012. A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) of Section Seventeen (17) of Township Twenty- Ir one (21) North and Range Fourteen (14) East of the Indian Base and Meridian (I.B.&M.), according to the U.S. Government Survey, thereof, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW comer of the SEA of Sec. 17, T -21 -N, R -14 -E, I.B.&M.; Thence N 0 I'l 5'46" W along the west line of said SE/4 a distance of 1050.00 feet; Thence N 88'44'33" E a distance of 658.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING being the South Comer of Lot I of Block 3 of OWASSO MEDICAL CAMPUS, a subdivision in the City of Owasso, according to the recorded Plat No. 5862, thereof-, Thence N 48'54'03" E along the easterly line of said Block 3 a distance of 1026.61 feet to the SW comer of Lot I of Block 6 of said OWASSO MEDICAL CAMPUS; Thence N 88'40'25" E a distance of 513.86 feet to the SE comer of said Lot 1 of Block 6; Thence N 01'19'35" W a distance of 240.00 feet to the NE comer of said Lot I of Block 6; Thence N 88'40'25" E along the south line of a 60 foot wide dedicated roadway as recorded in Book 7279 at Page 578, Tulsa County, for a distance of 180.53 feet; Thence S 01'19'35" E a distance of 59.69 feet; Thence S 21'10'25" W a distance of 109.16 feet; Thence S 01'19'35" E a distance of 518.93 feet; Thence S 88'38'40" W a distance of 202.84 feet; Thence S 32*53'13" W a distance of 264.23 feet; Thence S 88'44'33" W a distance of 1090.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 15.295 acres, more or less. The project design team consists of the following professionals: Developer: S & K Multifamily 12150 E. 96th Street North, Suite 200 Owasso, OK 74055 Tel: 918 376-6542 Fax: 918 272-0216 Page 5 Property Owner: Lloyd Jean Johnson Trust C/O Mark Johnson 20070 East 72d Street North Owasso, OK 74055 zmzmm�� Civil Engineer: Khoury Engineering, Inc. 1435 East 41st Street Tulsa, OK 74105 Tel (918) 712-8768 Fax (918) 712-1069 kenginc@khouryeng.com Landscape Architect Planning Design Group 5314 S. Yale Ave., Suite 710 Tulsa, OK 74135 Tel (918) 628-1255 Page 6 Elm PZEZM Architects Collective 4200 E Skelly Drive, # 750 Tulsa, OK 74135 Tel (918) 493-3362 mthomas@apid.net EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN m� ;p1m old, FIVON -Aws PAL 3 -tt H > III NOiS 1N3vqnN4m V, N tIPON 2 - old, ---- --- - -- - ------- - sObods ZZg :POPIAOJd o sWods L 19 : fpW 9't I prbaN d 01 OS jsWvvz :6ul 091 ajoo/sUdn 4'a1 'Aoo SGIOD 6Z'4! 48!S :A;!SUG(3 -C I nz :Spbn YiYG io3roxd so 4 1 ni :3NO10 aid SIM IVIINKIIS38 40 XIISNaC] FIVON -Aws PAL 3 -tt H > NOiS 1N3vqnN4m tIPON 2 - ---- --- - -- - ------- - sObods ZZg :POPIAOJd o sWods L 19 : fpW 9't I prbaN d 01 OS jsWvvz :6ul 091 ajoo/sUdn 4'a1 'Aoo SGIOD 6Z'4! 48!S :A;!SUG(3 -C I nz :Spbn YiYG io3roxd so 4 1 ni :3NO10 aid SIM IVIINKIIS38 40 XIISNaC] I *:4:ii: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN • Show front landscaping. Need two shade trees in front (per the street yard requirement). • Note menu board on site plan. • Make sure the drive-thru stacking requirements are accurate. • Correct the spelling of "Boxwood" in the landscape notes. • Please ensure that the site, drives and parking spaces meet the new City of Owasso parking requirements. It appears that the drive thru and queuing area does not meet these requirements. ONG- • Need a line extension to get down to this location. Fire Department- • No comments. -Ir Police- M • Need to know the voltage load. • Show east side easements to the transformer. • Use low profile plants in the front. • Show a stop sign on the west exit. ILI. L?l Y TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Karl Fritschen Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing, Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment - Small Wind Energy Systems DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: Alternative energy sources are becoming an affordable option for many homeowners, commercial businesses, and educational institutions. The "Go Green" Initiative, which was presented to the City Council in March 2010, is a document that identifies different opportunities the City should consider in an effort to conserve energy, protect the environment, and reduce its carbon footprint. This document recommended that development criteria be prepared to allow provisions for constructing small wind energy systems. Additionally, staff has received a few inquiries on the requirements for wind energy systems. With the price of fuel and energy showing no signs of abating, it is believed that these inquiries will continue, especially as the technology for wind energy continues to evolve and becomes more affordable. Considering the above, staff conducted research about wind energy systems and developed the attached requirements for the installation of small wind energy systems for both residential and commercial uses. The attached criteria, which will become a new section in Chapter 15 of the Owasso Zoning Code, were developed based on current technology. As the technology for wind energy improves, it will be important to revisit these criteria to ensure they remain current. The proposed change provides a comprehensive approach for the development of small wind energy systems and ensures that there is consistency in their construction and placement. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE OWASSO ZONING CODE: At the April 9, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting, staff presented a proposed amendment to the Owasso Zoning Code addressing small wind energy systems. The Commission suggested some changes to consider in the text language, and these were incorporated into the final attached draft. Below are the highlights of the changes made to the draft presented to the Planning Commission on April 9, 2012: Approvals will be granted through the Planning Commission as a Specific Use Permit. An analysis of the properties inside the Owasso City Limits reveals that approximately 20- 30 residential properties would qualify for a wind tower in terms of meeting the 1 acre requirement. The section discussing the installation of large commercial wind energy systems (wind farms) has been removed. A statement was added about how private covenants or deed restrictions may prohibit wind towers and that the ordinance does not preempt these. • Clarification was added as to the height of the wind tower blades in relation to nearby structures. • Provision was added that wind energy systems 15 feet in height or less would be allowed on any size lot oa long os the setback calculations are adhered to. The attached document represents the final draft of the proposed change to the Owasso Zoning Code. |f approved, this document will amend Chapter \5' Telecommunication Towers, by adding o new section 1530. Additionally, the title of Chapter 15 will be changed to read Telecommunication Towers and Small Wind Energy Systems. Some key elements of the proposed amendment include: • Minimum lot size standards • Setbacks from property lines and inhabited structures • Noise levels • Visual appearance • Permit requirements • Access control This zoning code amendment recognizes the need and proliferation of alternative energy sources and is designed to ensure that a process and procedure is in place for the safe construction of wind towers. The proposed amendment has been posted on the City's web page for approximately six weeks and this item has also been before the Owasso Economic Development Authority (DEOA). The City Council has also reviewed this item at three work sessions. As part of the amendment process, a public hearing is required to allow comments on the proposed amendment tothe zoning code. Once the public hearing b concluded, no action is necessary until the ordinance is brought fo City Council for adoption. The Owasso Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed text amendment and voted 5-0fo recommend approval fo the City Council. One suggestion made bv the Planning Commission that all wind towers shall meet all Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations has been added to the proposed new section. Ao ordinance amending Chapter l5ofthe zoning code will be brought to the June 5'20l2City Council meeting for consideration. Ul Section l530' Small Wind Energy Systems F 1530 SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS 1530.1 PURPOSE Z The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards that will protect the health, IN safety and general welfare of the public and achieve the following: • Provide design criteria that establish minimum requirements for small wind energy systems and commercial wind energy systems as defined herein to ensure the safe installation of wi towers in the City of Owasso • Promote energy savings and the use of `� dh infrastructure' 1530.2 APPLICABILITY The requirements of this ordinan .s all apply to atiAmall wind energy systems and commercial wind energy ms proposed after . ffective date of this ordinance. Wind energy syste which a required pt has been properly issued prior to the effective da a this r inance shall sot be required to meet the requirem�nhs of this or ovided, howe �. , that any such system shall be installs d functions thin 24 months of the date of the permit. Any system ?h been icy fled, but not used for two consecutive years ma of - bsequ�l used without meeting the requireme nos of this or ll ace. e -exis ystem shall be altered in any ma,pd% *t would %areas g_ree nonconformity with the requir.ments of is ordinan n .rations shall be made to a nonc forming pr - existing s during i life which exceeds 50% of its fair market value. such syste, is destroyed or damaged to the extent of %mte than g i fir mank value at the time of destruction or ■ j ■damage,. it shat not �e -re ons cted except in conformity with this ordinNcr! . k' 1530' MALL WIND E GY SY6V REQUIREMENTS A. al Height. T ot-to-exceed height of wind towers shall vary with the size of t�t. 1 1. For pr, a izes less than one acre in size the total height shall not = excee et_ 2. For property sizes between one acre and two acres, the total height shall not exceed 60 feet. 3. For property sizes between two and five acres, the total height shall not exceed 80 feet. 4. For property sizes greater than five acres, the total height shall not exceed 100 feet. B. Location. No small wind energy system shall be located in any front or side yard. C. Setbacks. 1. Property lines. A small wind enemy shall be set back from the nearest property line, public road ri way and communication and electrical line not less than the total height of the wind turbine. i 2. Inhabited Structures. A small . find energy system,� 11 be set back from the nearest inhabit structure not less t1.5 times the total height of the wind turbine. r �.1 D. Design Standards. . ■ ■ ; . 1. Monopole or FreA'and system shall be of a 2. Minim R11 min mum hell abrveafinished shed, hian = from sail qi 3. Ac 1% ground shall be c Oise. No gn of the small wind energy design without guy wires. He> or tO ersli excess Hof 30 feet in height, the of the lb we _ ent �urbine blade shall be 30 feet We and s be separated from any structure (i.e. house, Itional ele nt) not less than 1.5 times the blade height shall 1va climbing apparatus within 12 feet of the acce oors or access ways to towers and electrical equipment able. wind energy system shall exceed 60 dBA as measured at the y line or 50 dBA as measured at the nearest neighboring ding. 5. Visual AW°earance. Small wind energy systems shall be finished in a rust - resistant, non- obtrusive finish and color that is non - reflective. No small wind energy system shall be lighted unless required by the FAA. No advertising signs of any kind or nature whatsoever shall be permitted on any small wind energy system. No transmission equipment shall be installed on the tower. All equipment shall be screened with either a six foot opaque fence or with evergreen vegetation not less than six foot in height. 6. Electrical Interconnections. All electrical interconnection or distribution lines shall be underground and comply with all applicable codes and public utility requirements. 7. Signal Interference. Efforts shall be made to site small wind energy systems to reduce the likelihood of blocking or reflecting television and other communication signals. If signal interference occurs, both the small IN wind energy system owner and individual receiving interference shall make reasonable efforts to resolve the problem. No small wind energy system shall cause permanent and material interference with television or other communication signals. ON 8. Overspeed Controls. Every small it ergy system shall be equipped with both manual and automatic ove ntrols. 9. Federal Aviation Administr t' FAA). All wii wers shall meet Federal Aviation Administration (F ulations. Docu tation shall be provided that indicates the propose nd tower meets FAA tions. E. Permit Requirements. Application r a 1l wind ener y system shall be approved with a Spe %Jse Permit t ro a Planning Com ission following the procedures outli hapter 13,E dments. Applications shall include the following informat n. IF 1. Site plan. •A site plan 11 be to scased off a survey showing thee�llo�ca" ion�d the prop sed sma vn - nergy system and the locations of all,ee�i1rting Vuitaings, str nd pr y lines along with distances. �■ 2. Elet ns. Elevations shall rovided of the site drawn to scale showing the heig gonf ion of the small wind energy system and •th etgh istan MaLl.ex ing structures, buildings, electrical lines, 1.. an ert i s. .110111V .3. Engine Sp i ' tions. Standard drawings and an engineering analysis of the sys a towe�i�cluding weight capacity shall be provided. 4.S' ndation d Geotechnical. A standard foundation and anchor design a ith ing soil conditions and specifications for the soil conditions at t it I 5. Tower ecifications. Specific information on the type, size, rotor = material, rated power output, performance, safety, and noise characteristics of the system including the name and address of the manufacturer, model and serial number. 6. Safety Measures. Emergency and normal shutdown procedures shall be provided as part of the application for a wind energy system. 7. Electrical Connection. A line drawing of the electrical components of the w system in sufficient detail to establish that the installation conforms to all applicable electrical codes shall be provided along with evidence that the provider of electrical service of the property has been notified of the intent to install an interconnected electricity:generator (unless the system will not be connected to the electricity grid). 1530.5 NON USE 1. Any small wind energy system which complies with the terms of this ordinance which is not used for two years, excluding repairs, shall be removed within the following six months. Failure to remove the system shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. 2. Any small wind energy system or commer d energy system which is non- conforming and which is not used for one a x lkpg repairs, shall be removed within the following six months. Failure to remove..ie system shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. 1530.6 PRIVATE COVENANTS Private covenants or deed restrictio m hibit the ir�t�jlation of small wind energy systemsrThe City of O es not enforce p vate covenants and this ordinance shall=not0kreempt priva a covenants. 1530.7 DEFINITIONS r II ON 1. Total Height. Tlie-distance measured' rom,g[Wnnd level to the blade extended at its higQRpoint. ��` L ` Vr 2. Small Wind E � . A win ergy conversion system consisting of a wind ur ine, � $--associate ontrol or conversion electronics which l ill us man redM ' i e'consumption of utility power. 3'.04NM* dmill Rotx.ST�iat P of the windmill which includes the blades, hub, shaft. r i 4. WindA- kkTower. The supporting structure on which the rotor, turbine, and accessoreq ipmgnre mounted. 5. Commercial nergy System. A wind energy conversion system consisting of more than one wind turbine and tower; a wind energy conversion system which will be used primarily for off -site consumption of power. -rr i J � � • :RJ4�iJ r: TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso FROM: Roger Stevens Public Works Director SUBJECT: FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program Proposed Project Listing DATE: May 11, 2012 BACKGROUND: Annually, the Capital Improvements Fund allows for the expenditure of funds to repair and /or resurface residential and non - residential roadways. Street rehabilitation sites are evaluated and selected based on a comprehensive assessment of roadway conditions. The selection process is aimed at maximizing the taxpayer's return on investment by incrgasing roadway lifecycle and minimizing future maintenance costs while enhancing overall roadway driving conditions and public safety. As in previous years, the City of Owasso desires to further maximize cost savings by partnering with Tulsa County to complete various asphalt overlay portions of the rehabilitation project. A formal request, via an Interlocal Agreement, for the use of County labor and equipment for roadway segments receiving a 2" asphalt overlay will be submitted for City Council consideration and appropriate action subsequent to approval of the FY 2012 -2013 rehabilitation priorities. PRIORITY STREET REPAIRS /MAINTENANCE IDENTIFIED: In November 2011, the Public Works staff completed an update to the city's street inventory. The data collected for the model was adjusted to reflect changes in segment conditions and a new priority listing was generated. A map depicting the location of the proposed priority sites is attached for review. The anticipated cost for the proposed street rehabilitation priorities is approximately $1.2 million and includes 4% contingency funding. PROJECT FUNDING: Funding for this project in the amount of $1 million is proposed in the FY 2012 -2013 Capital Improvements Fund budget. As you may recall, FY 2011 -2012 Street Rehabilitation bids were significantly less than the engineering estimates. Thus, staff will be recommending approximately $200,000 be carried over in July 2012 in order to fully fund this proposed project. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Council approval of the FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Program priority sites. ATTACHMENTS: A. Recommended FY 2012 -2013 Street Repair Location Map B. Priority Site List C. Preventive Maintenance Guidelines and Options OkIK FPK❑ 1 2 3 4 i., 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STREET FROM TO SUBDIVISION REPAIR TYPE N 123 E AVE E 76 ST N E 76 PL N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 123 E AVE E 76 PL N E 77 ST N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 123 E AVE E 77 ST N E 77 PL N ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 76 PL N N 123 E AVE N 126 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 77 ST N N 123 E AVE N 126 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 82 PL N N 118 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC ELM CREEK BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY N 121 E AVE E 78 ST N CUL -DE -SAC ELM CREEK ESTATES 1 BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 82 PL N N 122 E AVE N 122 E AVE ELM CREEK ESTATES BASE REPAIR, MICROSURFACE E 114 ST N N 109 PL E N 110 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 110 E AVE N 111 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 111 E AVE N 112 E AVE HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 114 ST N N 112 E AVE GARNETT RD HALE ACRES BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY E 98 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 99 E AVE N 100 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 110 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 102 E AVE N 103 CT E HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 98 ST N N 103 CT E END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 98 E AVE E 97 PL N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 98 CT E E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 99 CT E E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 99 E AVE E 98 ST N E 97 PL N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 PL N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 100 E AVE E 97 PL N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL N 100 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 PL N N 100 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL E 97 CT N N 102 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 28 N 102 E AVE END E 97 CT N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 29 N 102 E AVE E 97 CT N E 98 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 30 N 102 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 31 N 102 E AVE E 99 ST N E 100 CT N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 32 N 102 E AVE E 100 CT N END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 33 N 100 E AVE E 99 ST N E 100 PL N HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 34 N 100 E AVE E 100 PL N END HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 35 E 100 PL N N 100 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 36 E 99 ST N N 100 E AVE N 102 E AVE HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 37 N 103 E CT E 98 ST N CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 38 E 100 CT N N 102 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC HONEY CREEK 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 39 E 110 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 40 N 98 E AVE E 110 ST N E 100 PL N METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 41 E 110 PL N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 42 E 110 PL N N 98 E AVE N 99 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 43 N 99 E AVE E 110 PL N E 111 ST N METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 44 E 111 ST N MINGO RD N 99 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 1 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 45 E 108 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 46 N 98 E AVE E 108 ST N E 108 CT N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 47 N 98 E AVE E 108 CT N E 108 PL N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 48 N 98 E AVE E 108 PL N E 109 ST N METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 49 E 109 ST N MINGO RD N 98 E AVE METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 50 E 109 ST N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 51 E 108 PL N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 52 E 108 CT N N 98 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC METRO HEIGHTS 2 CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 53 E 97 PL N N 107 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 54 N 107 E AVE E 98 ST N E 99 ST N EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR 55 N 107 E AVE KNUCKLE EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, MICROSURFACE 56 E 96 PL N N 107 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 57 N 107 E PL E 96 PL N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 58 N 108 E AVE E 96 PL N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 59 N 108 E AVE E 98 ST N E 97 ST N EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, FOG SEAL 60 E 97 ST N N 108 E AVE N 109 E AVE EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 61 E 97 ST N N 109 E AVE N 110 E AVE EL RIO VISTA VALLEY GUTTER, FOG SEAL 62 N 109 E AVE E 97 ST N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, MICROSURFACE 63 E 97 PL N N 110 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA CRACK SEAL, MICROSURFACE 64 E 96 PL N N 111 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC E EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 65 E 96 PL N N 111 E AVE CUL -DE -SAC W EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 66 N 112 E AVE E 99 ST N CUL -DE -SAC EL RIO VISTA BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 67 CEDAR ST E 86 ST N E 11 ST N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 68 CEDAR ST E 11 ST N E 8 ST N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 69 E 87 ST N CEDAR ST GARNETT RD POST OFFICE BASE REPAIR, OVERLAY 70 E 3 CT N ELM PL ELM ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 71 E 3 CT N ELM ST DOGWOOD ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 72 DOGWOOD ST E 3 CT N E 3 PL N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 73 E 3 PL N CEDAR ST DOGWOOD ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 74 N 149 E AVE E 91 ST N E 90 ST N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 75 N 149 E AVE E 90 ST N E 89 PL N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 76 N 149 E AVE E 89 PL N E 89 ST N PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 77 N 147 E AVE S E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 78 N 148 E AVE N E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 79 N 149 E AVE E 89 ST N CUL -DE -SAC PRESTON LAKES BASE REPAIR, CRACK SEAL, FOG SEAL 80 E L" PLACE E 3 ST N E 3 CT N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 81 ELM STREET E 3 ST N ;_ E 3 CT N ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 82 E 3 ST N ELM PL ELM ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY 83 E 3 ST N ELM ST CEDAR ST ORIGINAL TOWN BASE REPAIR, CURB, OVERLAY Preventive Maintenance Types Pavement maintenance services are provided under two programs designed to preserve and repair roadways: l. Preventive Maintenance, which includes • Fog Seal • Crack Seal • Micropove/S|uny3ea| • Resurfacing/Overlay l Pavement Reconstruction Preventive maintenance, if performed before the road begins to break up, isthe most cost- effective offheh*uprogronn. Its purpose ish» extend the life of the road and fo keep iflooking and riding, os much os possible, in like-new condition. The work performed under apreventive maintenance program could include fog sealing, micropave/o|uny sealing, and resurf8oing/oveday. The purpose of any type of preventive maintenance isto stop water Mom seeping info the roadway material, which causes early break-up of the road surface. The useful life of roadways can beexfended from 20 toos much as lO0 years if, on a n*gu|odyxohedu|ld basis, small breaks are fixed and a seal coat or resurfacing is performed before severe damage m qco irs' Thir is q,\"v.Qpipbp.QcQqg 4vpd�.Lp&uj|QesPerlormedmpnsbQ`btm4hatappear to be in goo� qdditio of applying an copho|f emulsion to on existing pavement surface 0 improve sealing or waterproofing and prevent further stone loss by holding the aggregate in place. Ty picaUy' this method is recommended once the pavement life has reached five to seven years. 8y performing such mminfenonoe'the pavement |�ais expected tobee�endedbv�veyean. m m Crack SealiM m/\ method of applying a long lasting, resilient sealant in cracks and joints which iu flexible and expandable invoryinog and extreme pavement temperatures. The seakint will prevent the invasion of surface water between the layers of asphalt and sub- grade rook' thus preventing premature failures, deterioration, and potholes. By performing such maintenance, thempavement life is expected to be extended by three fo five years. M8cropave - Application of o mixture of fine aggregate with asphalt emulsion. Micropove is utilized on streets with higher traffic vo|umesm Depending on the traffic volume, this method is recommended once the pavement life has reached five to eight years. By performing such maintenance, the pavement is expected to be extended for on additional lOyears. Resurface/ Overlay - Asphalt overlay iso road-resurfacing method where m lift ofasphalt is placed on top of the existing roadway surface. Asphalt overlays are designed to extend the life of a road's dhving surface and keep roads in good condition by preventing potholes and preserving the underlying road bed structure. With preventive maintenance measures in place, the pavement life is expected to be extended for an additional l5-20years. IZ.TTTI=I- 11 When the condition ofa roadway reaches the point where preventive maintenance isnolonger cost-effective, the entire roadway must be removed and replaced. -d he City ut Limits. TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Owasso z FROM: Rodney Ray City Manager SUBJECT: Request for Lease - Purchase of Real Property DATE: May 11, 2012 An item has been placed on the May 15, 2012 City Council agenda for consideration and appropriate action to approve the lease- purchase agreement of property located on the southwest corner of E 76th Street North and S Main Street, formerly the site of the First Bank of Owasso. Details relating to the lease- purchase agreement are being negotiated between counsel for both the city and the property owner, however are not substantially different from those discussed during the May 8, 2012 Council worksession. x