HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.06.19_City Council AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: June 19, 2012
TIME: 6:30 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers, Old Central Building
109 N. Birch
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Cler d post it!~ ty Hall at 6:00 p.m. on
Friday, June 15, 2012.
Sherry Bisho ,sty 7ZIr
AGENDA
Call to Order
Mayor Doug Bonebrake
2. Invocation
Pastor Glenn Shaffer of Destiny Life Church
3. Flag Salute
4. Roll Call
5. Citizen request to address the City Council
Kristen Saint
Attachment #5
Ms. Saint is requesting to address the Council regarding the placement of a traffic calming
device in the Fairways at Bailey Ranch in the area of N. 1015+ East Avenue, between E. 95th
Court North and E. 95th Street North.
6. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the Consent
Agenda. All matters listed under "Consent" are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Councilor may, however, remove an item
from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non-
debatable.
A. Approval of Minutes of the June 5, 2012 Regular Meeting and the June 12, 2012 Special
Meeting
Attachment # 6-A
B. Approval of Claims
Attachment # 6-B
C. Acknowledge receipt of the monthly budget status report
Attachment # 6-C
D. Authorization to discharge fireworks and approval of a public fireworks display to be
conducted on July 3, 2012 free of charge to the public and sponsored by the City of
Owasso in celebration of Independence Day.
Attachment # 6-D
Owasso City Council
June 19, 2012
Page 2
E. Authorization to discharge fireworks and approval of a public fireworks display to be
conducted on June 28, 2012 free of charge to the public and sponsored by Stone
Canyon in celebration of Independence Day.
Attachment # 6-E
F. Approval of Retirement Benefits from the City's Oklahoma Municipal Retirement Fund
(OMRF) Plan for Gary Collins (Normal Retirement) and Scott Shadbolt (Deferred
Retirement).
Attachment # 6-F
7. Consideration and appropriate action relating to items removed from the Consent Agenda
8. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of the 2012-13
contract between the City of Owasso and the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF)
Local #2789, and authorization to execute the contract.
Ms. Dempster
Attachment #8
Staff recommends approval of the 2012-13 contract between the City of Owasso and the
International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) Local #2789, and authorization to execute
the contract.
9. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of Resolution No.
2012-06, adopting the FY 2012-2013 annual operating budget
Mr. Ray
Attachment #9
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2012-06.
10. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for approval of a supplemental
appropriations as follows:
• General Fund - Increase estimated revenues by $379,008 and the appropriation
for expenditures by $379,008
• Ambulance Service Fund - Increase appropriation for expenditures by $15,000
• CDBG Fund - Increase revenues and the appropriation for expenditures by $114
Ms. Janet Isaacs
Attachment # 10
Staff recommends approval of supplemental appropriations for fiscal year end.
11. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request to dissolve and disband the
Owasso Public Golf Authority
Councilor Patrick Ross
Councilor Ross requested this item be placed on the agenda.
12. Report from City Manager
13. Report from City Attorney
14. Report from City Councilors
15. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen at
the time of posting of the agenda)
16. Adjournment
F
TO: Th id City Council
De
SUBJECT: C"' . 'he City Council
-
DATE:
REQUESTED TACTION:
An ifem has been placed on the June 19, 2012 City Council agenda in order to accommodate
a citizen's request to address the City Council concerning the placement of traffic calming
devices in the area o N. 101St East Avenue, between E. 95th Court N. and E. 95th Street North.
a
BACKGROUND:
In October of 2003, Council approved the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (see
attachment C) in order to establish a policy for installation of speed humps. Implementation of
the Program began January 1, 2004.
The procedure summarized from the Program is the following:
In the "Collect Data/Verify Problem" step, the street segment is assessed and checked for the
following criteria:
The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction
If each of the criteria is met, then the project warrants the installation of a speed hump. The next
step begins the petitioning process and NOA approval as outlined in the Neighborhood Traffic
Calming Program procedures.
TRAFFIC STUDY:
In 2006, City staff received an application from Kristen Saint of 10102 E 95th CT N for the
installation of a traffic calming device in her neighborhood. Two studies were performed at the
L4-, requested location of N 101St E Ave between E 95th CT N and E 95th ST N: a summer study on June
5, 2006 and a follow-up study during school session on October 24, 2006. In 2011, City staff
received a second request from Ms. Saint for the same requested street and a study was
performed on October 3, 2011. Ms. Saint was notified of the study results and the street's failure
to meet the program criteria for installing a speed hump.
The first two studies (2006) were performed approximately 250 feet south of the stop sign at 96th
Street for N 101st E Avenue. The third study (2011) was taken approximately 450 feet south of the
stop sign for 96th ST. Location of the traffic studies are shown in the following figure.
The results from each study were as follows:
Date
Traffic Volume (vehicles per day)
85th %tile speed
6/5/06
1,287 vpd
27 mph
10/24/06
1,629 vpd
26 mph
10/3/11
896 vpd
29 mph
As shown above, the traffic volume meets the criteria each time; however the 85th percentile
does not meet the requirement of a minimum of 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed is defined as
the speed in which the fastest 15% of vehicles are traveling at or above, or the slowest 85% of
vehicles travel below this speed.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Correspondence dated May 9, 2012 - Ms. Kristen Saint
B. Correspondence dated October 17, 2011 - Traffic Calming Program results
C. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedures
Stevens, Julie
From:
Kristen Saint [kristen.saint@eviti.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:53 AM
To:
Stevens, Julie
Cc:
ksaint1 @cox.net: Matt Saint
Subject:
Request to Address City Council
Dear City Clerk,
I am sending this email to request the opportunity to address the City Council concerning child safety in the Fairways at
Bailey Ranch.
There has been an ongoing safety concern with the speed of vehicles on N. 101St E. Ave, between E. 95th Ct. N. and E.
95th St. N.
There are approximately 25 children under the age of 14 that play in this vicinity.
In accordance with City procedure, I have filed for a Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device with the Public Works Dept. on
two separate occasions. Both times, my request was denied due to what they deem to be low traffic volume.
We have also had the Owasso City Police Department set up a radar trailer in the area in hopes of deterring speeding,
but to no avail.
This past weekend, on May 6, around the noontime, a speeding car in this area struck our neighbor's mailbox, sending it
and car parts flying up to approximately 75 feet towards my yard where my children frequently play and ride bikes. A
police report was taken.
I come before you now to request an appeal to the denial of the Speed Hump/Traffic Calming device.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely
Kristen L. Saint
10102 E. 95th Ct. N.
Owasso, OK 74055
(918) 808-1207
Ksaintl@cox.net
Kristen.saint@eviti.com
Ne,
M
October 17, 2011
Kristen Saint
10102 E 95th CT N
Owasso, OK 74055
Subject: Notification of Failure to Meet Criteria - Traffic Calming Program
Dear Ms. Saint:
The City of Owasso would like to thank you for your participation in the Traffic Calming
Program. We have received your application and have completed a thorough evaluation of your
requested street segment. The assessment included:
• Speed limit posted
Average daily traffic
• Average speed of traffic
• 85th Percentile speed of traffic
• Street size, length, width
• Obstacles(As described in criteria) preventing installation of Speed Hum p/Stop Sign
r "
P
Unfortunately, upon final completion of the assessment, it has been determined that the street
segment requested in your application has failed to meet the Traffic Calming Program criteria
for the installation of a speed hump or a stop sign. In accordance with the current Traffic
Calming Program process, the assessment of the street segment on your application will expire
one year after completion of the assessment. At that time, you will be able to resubmit an
application for that specific street segment. The assessment for your requested street segment
was completed on 10/03/11.
Please contact this office should you have any questions or would like to discuss the details of
your application's evaluation.
Sincerely,
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
g, P. E.
T _ .~g Program Administrator
cc: Stevens, Public Works Director
(918) 272-4959
City of Owasso FAX (918) 272-4996
om _ A City of Character .cityofowasso com
City o Owasso
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Introduction
Today, because of the increased dependency of vehicles for mobility, we see a dramatic
increase in vehicle speeds and daily neighborhood traffic volume on local streets.
Additionally, as delay on arterials has increased, some motorists have decided to bypass
the congested arterials and use neighborhood streets to get from one arterial to another
or as a shortcut to their destination.
When concerns regarding traffic speeds, pedestrian safety and cut-through traffic arise in
residential areas, it is often frustrating for both residents and traffic engineers. Neighborhoods
often request a quick fix solution such as enforcement, reduction in posted speed limits or the
addition of stop signs. This type of fix often increases the pressure to implement haphazard
solutions that may not be in the best interests of the neighborhood, the city or the traveling
public.
Traffic calming involves the application of engineering techniques to physically change the
character of streets, improve pedestrian safety and encourage drivers to obey speed limits. A
variety of physical devices can be used to alter the geometry of the street, along with more
traditional traffic engineering techniques to slow traffic. Generally, a successful traffic calming
plan is not a single device, but rather a series of integrated improvements to slow traffic and/or
direct traffic to more appropriate routes.
The use of traffic calming devices must be carefully documented so that they are not used
inaVropriately or too frequently. A four-phased procedure is typically used by which traffic
calming devices are requested, evaluated for appropriateness and implemented:
• Documentation of the problem and the need for traffic calming devices;
• The collection of field reconnaissance and traffic study data;
• Selecting the proper device to correct the problem; and
• Monitoring the effectiveness of solving the problem once the device(s) are installed.
It is the intention of the City of Owasso Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program to address
traffic problems and concerns on local streets and applies to all residential subdivision streets in
the City of Owasso. While not intended to make streets play areas for children or adults, the
Program is intended to generally improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and others who travel
along or across these streets.
Current City Practices
fi The residential speed limit in the City of Owasso is 25 miles per hour. Initial attempts to provide
traffic calming has centered around stop sign installations to affect speeding and cut-through
drivers on collector and local residential streets. Since February 1995, the city has administered
the Policy of Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control. This policy sought to discourage all
traffic from traveling at excessive speeds through neighborhoods. As more multi-way stop signs
are installed, there are fewer and fewer reasonably spaced locations for sign installations.
Additionally, stop signs have not allows been effective and may present a greater risk due to
:LF.
Page 2
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
driver failure to stop. These guidelines provide city officials and residents with the opportunity
to recommend, select, analyze and critique measures aimed at improving traffic conditions in and
around local neighborhoods.
Proposed Traffic Calmin&Implementation Plan
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) defines traffic calming in the following manner:
"Traffic calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that
reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and
improve conditions for non-motorized street users. "
Depending on the specific location and the residential street classification, the purpose of traffic
calming is to restore streets to their intended function to provide combinations of mobility and
accessibility.
Experiences in other localities have shown that traffic calming is not a program that can be
implemented under strict guidelines. Various solutions are often available and a successful
program depends on staff and citizens that are willing to work together toward a common goal.
Recommended Practices
Based on cost, ease of construction and availability of materials, the speed hump is
recommended to be the primary traffic calming device for existing residential and collector
streets in Owasso. In general, speed humps have been found to reduce traffic speed, volumes
and accidents. In addition, they discourage through traffic from using a local street as an
alternative route to inconvenient or congested arterial and collector streets.
Traffic Calming Process
Planning
The traffic calming process is planned at the neighborhood level, but implemented on an
uninterrupted street segment basis. Planning on a neighborhood-wide basis will help to identify if
solving a problem on one street shifts it to another street. Additionally, an opportunity to plan for
a comprehensive series of devices that will work together to improve the traffic operations of a
neighborhood will be used.
Public Involvement
A successful traffic calming program must involve the public and clearly be understood by all
participants. Participation by those living along the affected street and adjacent registered
neighborhood associations is essential.
Homeowners living along the affected street segment will be asked to complete petitions that
account for their participation and either affirm or not affirm their support for the installation(s).
The requester of the traffic calming device(s) will solicit the neighborhood(s) for signatures and
submit the petition. Additionally, registered homeowner associations that are directly affected
will be ask to complete a statement that acknowledges adjacent streets to the traffic calmed street
may see an increase in traffic and/or speed.
Page 3
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Funding
Traffic calming measures will be funded using approved capital funds included in the annual
budget. Warranted and approved traffic calming measures will be identified and prioritized for
installation according to the established criteria. The application date on approved installations
will serve as secondary criteria. Installation will commence and continue based on the
availability of capital funding as outlined in the current and adopted budget.
Authority and Scone X
The Director of Public Works will administer the traffic calming program. In accordance with
established procedures, the Director will have responsibility to develop application forms, install
or remove traffic calming devices. The effective date for the traffic calming program is January
1, 2004. r
Page 4
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Procedure
• Receipt of Traffic Calming Request (Application)
Requests for traffic calming measures can be made by individual residents or neighborhood
associations using an application available from the Public Works Department. In addition, City
staff may identify an area as a problem and a sponsor resident must be determined prior to the
project proceeding forward in the manner described below.
• Acknowledgment
Acknowledgement will be sent to the individual (contact person) making the inquiry. That
person must reside on the requested street segment within the boundaries defined on the traffic
calming application. The acknowledgement will confirm that a study is underway and will
indicate an anticipated completion date.
• Define the study area/problem
To be eligible for consideration, a street must serve areas that are primarily residential. On
finding that the identified street meets this standard and is eligible for traffic calming, the Public
Works Department Engineering Division staff will identify the limits of the street to be subject to
the study process.
• Collect DataNerify Problem
Engineering Division staff will commence with both data collection and review of existing
operational and geometric characteristics of the street in question. Eligibility for a traffic calming
installation will be verified by checking collected data to the warrants and a review of the
operational and geometric characteristics of the street segment.
Data to determine warrants for the installation of the speed hump will be collected by
Engineering Division staff. A street will warrant traffic calming if it meets the following criteria:
• The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction.
• The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less.
• The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the
regulatory speed limit.
• The street has more than 500 vehicles in a 24 hour period.
• The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day
• Develop Plan of Traffic Calming Measure
If the street segment meets criteria and warrants for traffic calming, a sketch plan of the proposed
traffic calming measure to be utilized will be prepared by Engineering Division staff.
If the requested street does not meet criteria and warrants, the requestor will be notified through
the U. S. Postal Service. No further study action will be taken.
Page 5
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
• Notification/Evidence of Support
Upon determination that a street meets the criteria for speed hump installation, the Public Works
Department will notify the applicant of the status of their request. The applicant will be
informed of the requirement for a support petition, verification statement and Homeowners
Association endorsement. The Public Works Department will supply forms to the applicant,
along with the sketch plan for the installation and a map to be used to show households and
businesses that are to be included in the petition area
Petition
The applicant(s) or other neighborhood representatives will be required to circulate a petition
before the City takes any action to implement the speed hump installation plan. A petition from
adjacent residents and business owners is required. The petition must document that at least two-
thirds (67 ) of all households and businesses adjacent to the project support the installation of
speed humps.
All properties within the affected area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication
of preference (in favor or oppose) or by written statement by the contact person why a specific
property was not represented. Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not
account for all properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process.
Verification Statement
A verification statement confirming the signatures on the speed hump petition are valid and
represent at least two-thirds (67 ) of the households/businesses adjacent to the project street is
required from the applicant.
Both property owners and renters are allowed to sign the petition. Each household and business
address is entitled to one signature. If both the owner of a property and tenant submit a signature,
the owner's signature will override the tenant's
If the petition is found to be invalid the complainant(s) will be given an opportunity to re-process
the petition and submit it a later date. If a sufficient petition cannot be obtained the City will
discontinue the traffic calming efforts at the location.
Homeowners Association Endorsement
Registered neighborhood associations adjacent to the street segment area will be asked to sign a
statement endorsing the traffic calming installation. If the subdivision does not have a
homeowners association, then this endorsement is not applicable.
The applicant will deliver the completed forms to the Public Works Department. Each form will
be authenticated by Engineering Division staff.
• Ranking Traffic Calming Sites
After meeting operational, geometric and general warrant criteria, traffic calming projects will be
prioritized on a citywide basis. This action ensures proper allocation of city resources and it
ensures an equitable process to citizens.
Page 6
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Projects will be ranked for funding and installation according to assigned points on the basis of-
* 85th percentile speed,
24-hour traffic volume,
Total number of reported crashes over a two-year period, and
Proximity to special traffic generators.
The street segment installation accumulating the greatest number of points will be considered to
have the highest priority. Among project installations with the same rank, higher priority will be
given to the application with the earliest application date subsequent to the effective date of the
traffic calming program.
Page 7
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Speed Hump Installation and Removal Criteria
Speed Hump Location Considerations
• The street shall provide access (via a driveway or on-street parking) to abutting
residential and/or commercial properties (residential local or collector streets).
Residential properties include multiple dwellings such as apartment complexes
• The street shall not have more than one traffic lane in each direction.
• The street shall have a regulatory speed limit of 25 mph or less.
• The 85th percentile speed on the street section must be at least 10 mph over the
regulatory speed limit.
• Speed humps should not be located in a horizontal curve, on vertical curves where
visibility of the hump is restricted, or on the approaches to these curves.
• For speed hump installation, the street should have curb and gutter. Considerations
may be given to streets without curb and gutter. In such cases, special care should be
used to accommodate drainage and prevent vehicle run-arounds.
• Street segment boundaries identified for traffic calming should be uninterrupted
segments of street (i.e., no stop signs).
If an applicant does identify a street segment with interrupted points, then the project
plan may direct the existing interrupted points be removed.
• Speed humps will not be located in front of a driveway or within an intersection.
Speed humps shall be kept a minimum of 100 feet from the near curb line of an
intersecting street.
• Speed lips "I not be. locked over r~,~oles or adjacent to a fire hydrant.
• Speed humps located near drainage inlets will be placed immediately downstream of
the inlet.
• Speed humps will be located as near as practical on property lines to minimize the
intrusion of the speed hump on abutting property frontages.
• To the extent possible, speed humps will be located near existing mid-block street
lighting.
• A speed hump will not be located in front of a property if the occupant objects to its
placement or, in the case of multiple dwellings, if a majority of the households on the
property object to its placement. Fulfillment of this requirement is the responsibility
of the applicant (contact person).
• The average daily traffic must be less than 5,000 vehicles per day to qualify for speed
humps.
Speed Hump Spacing and Location
• Speed humps will typically be placed 200 to 600 feet apart. Other spacing may be
used upon based on engineering judgment.
• On single short blocks (300 to 500 feet), a single speed hump will be positioned near
the mid-point.
• On single blocks of moderate length (500 to 1,000 feet), a two speed hump
configuration at third points will be used.
Page 8
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
• On very long blocks (1,000 to 1,600 feet), three speed humps will be placed on
approximate quarter points.
• On lengthy continuous street segments or segments comprised of a number of blocks,
desirable interior speed hump spacing will be 400 to 600 feet.
• A street segment or block must be at least 300 feet to qualify for speed hump
installation.
Speed Hump Removal
• Citizens may request a street segment be reviewed for the possible removal of some
or all of the existing humps. An application will be available from the Public Works
Department.
The affected area will be determined by Public Works Department Engineering
Division staff and will include primarily those properties facing or abutting the street
segment on which speed humps are located. A property will be considered part of the
affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires traveling over existing speed
humps requested to be removed.
The removal request must originate from a resident, business, or entity whose
property is within the affected segment area. The affected area will be determined by
Public Works Engineering Division staff and will include primarily those properties
facing or abutting the street segment on which speed humps are located. A property
will be considered part of the affected area if its only ingress and egress route requires
Iraygling over existing speed humps requested to be removed.
• Notification / Evidence of Support
Subsequent to the application for speed hump removal on a segment, a map of the
affected area will be prepared and a petition packet sent to the applicant (contact
person) for documenting support for the removal. All properties within the affected
area must be accounted for, either by signature and indication of preference (in favor
or oppose) or by written statement by the
contact person why a specific property was not represented. There must be at least a
67 percent evidence of support to further the process.
Requests with either no petition or with a petition that does not account for all
properties will be considered incomplete and will not further the process.
The specific street segment indicated on the removal application will be the basis to
identify the speed humps for removal. Final determination for the removal will be at
the discretion of the City of Owasso Public Works Department staff.
Page 9
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Based on engineering judgment, the review process may recommend removal of
none, some, or all of the speed humps. Factors considered, but not limited to, are:
a. Existing speed hump locations and spacing
b. Stop/yield signs along the segment
c. Historical and existing traffic speed and volume information
d. Collision History
e. Presence or absence of sidewalks, schools and parks
If speed studies conducted along the requested segment or portions of the segment
show the 85ffi percentile speed is greater than or equal to 10 mph over the posted
speed limit, then no hump removal will occur along the segment or portion of the
segment represented by the study.
In addition, the city reserves the right to remove any traffic calming measure that is
potentially unsafe and impairs the public safety and welfare.
Design Standards, Construction, and Maintenance
The City of Owasso Public Works Department will prepare and maintain current design
standards and installation and removal procedures for speed humps and other traffic calming
devices in accordance with current design practices and criteria.
Design and construction or removal of traffic calming devices along with associated pavement
markings and signs will be the responsibility of the Public Works Department. Future
maintenance of traffic calming devices will be the responsibility of the City of Owasso.
IM,
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Procedure
Public Works receives Traffic Calming Application
• Acknowledge applicant
• Define study area/problem
• Collect data/verify problem
r
Letter to applicant No Warrants
that requested street met?
does not meet criteria
Yes
Close Prepare sketch plan of proposed speed hump
request installation
Prepare map of area to be included in petitions
• Forward applicant plan, map and petition packet
Applicant completes petitions,
verification form and
Homeowners Association
endorsement (if applicable) and
returns to Public Works
Department
s7
4i
Letter to applicant
that plan was not
aooroved
No
Residents
approve plan?
Yes
Close Authenticate petition and other forms
request Prioritize installations for funding/installation
• Schedule work
• Close out project
O ASS CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES O REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, June 5, 2012 in the Council
Chambers at Old Central per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall
bulletin board at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, June 1, 2012.
ITEM 1 CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order at 6:30 p,m.
ITEM 2 INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Pastor Bill Ascol of Bethel Baptist Church
ITEM 3 FLAG SALUTE
Councilor Ross led the flag salute
ITEM 4 ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Doug oebrake, Mayor
Chris Kelley, Vice Mayor
Jeri Moberly, Councilor
Charlie Brown, Councilor
Patrick Ross, Councilor
A quorum was declared present
STAFF
Rodney Ray, City Manager
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
ITEM 5 PRESENTATION F THE CHARACTER TRAIT ALERTNESS
Warren Lehr, Character Council ember, presented "Alertness," the Character Trait of the
Month for June 2012,
ITEM 6 PRESENTATION FROM THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF OKLAHOMA
Carrie Rowland of SO presented a check to the city for participation in the Model Cities
Program.
Owasso City Council June 5, 2012
ITEM 7 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A ROUST FOR COUNCIL
APPROVAL O THE CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Brown requested item be removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration.
Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr. Ross to approve items A, C, D, and o the Consent
Agenda.
YEA; Brown, Ross, Kelley, Moberly, onebrae
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0
ITEM 8 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO ITEMS REMOVED FROM
THE CONSENT AGE DA
Mr. Rodney Ray responded to questions relating to item B, Claims, on the consent agenda,
After discussion, r. Brown moved, seconded by r. Ross, to approve item B, Claims, totaling
$241,885.43. Also included for review was the payroll payment report for 5/19/2012.
YEA. Moberly, Brown, Ross, Kelley, Bonebroke
NAY: None
Motion carried -0
PUBLIC HEARING
P"
Owasso City Council June 5, 2012
This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting.
This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting.
ITEM 12 CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR
APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE O. 1006; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF
OASSO ZOINI G CODE S CODIFIED IN THE OWASSO CODE OF ORDINANCES,
PART 1, PLANNING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT, CHAPTER 2, ZONING
REGULATIONS, SUB-CHAPTER 15, TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS AND SMALL WIND
ENERGY SYSTEMS, BY ADDING SUB-SECTION 1530, SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS
Mr. Karl rischen presented the item recommending approval o Ordinance No, 1006,
amending Chapter 15 of the Owasso Zoning Code. After discussion, r. Kelley moved,
seconded by r. Ross to approve Ordinance No. 1006, as recommended.
YEA: Kelley, Moberly, Ross, Brown, Bonebrake
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0
ITEM 13 REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER
ITEM 14 REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY
No report
ITEM 15 REPORT FROM CITY COUNCILORS
No Report
ITEM 16 NEW BUSINESS
None
3
Owasso City Council June 5, 2012
ITEM 17 ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Ross moved, seconded by Vs. Moberly, to adjourn the meeting.
YEA: Ross, Brown, Moberly, Kelley, Bonebrake
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
Doug onerake, ayor
Ashley Hickman, Minute Clerk
F
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL, OPWA, AND OPGA
MINUTES OF JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2012
The Owasso City Council, Owasso Public Works Authority, and Owasso Public Golf Authority met
in a special meeting on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 in the Council Chambers at Old Central, 109 N.
Birch Street, per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 6:00 P on Friday, June 8, 2012,
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bonebrake called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
PRESENT
Doug Bonebrake, Mayor/Chairman
Chris Kelley, Vice Mayor/Vice Chairman
Jeri Moberly, Councilor/Trustee
Patrick Ross, Councilor/Trustee
ABSENT
Charlie Brown, Councilor/Trustee
A quorum was declared present
ITEM 2: DISCUSSION RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
A. Supplemental Appropriations Fiscal Year End
Sherry Bishop presented the item and discussion was held. It was further explained that item A
will be placed on the June 19 agenda for consideration and appropriate action.
ITEM 3: DISCUSSION RELATING TO CITY MANAGER ITEMS
Rodney Ray opened the floor for discussion on item A, the FY 12-1 Budget Proposal. Discussion
was held. It was further explained that item A will be placed on the June 19 agenda for
consideration and appropriate action.
Rodney Ray presented item B, FOP and IAFF Contract Status Updates, and discussion was held.
Rodney Ray and Julie Stevens presented item C, Board and Committee Appointments, and
discussion was held.
Rodney Ray presented item D. He announced the State of the City to be held on June 27 and
encouraged councilors and citizens to attend. Also, a report on the First Bank Building will be
completed in 10 to 14 days, The report will include appraisal value, cost estimates for HVAC,
and an inspection report.
Roger Stevens gave an update on reimbursement funds for the street sweeper and STP funds
available that could possibly save the city 930,300 on the 106th & Garnett project.
Owasso City CouncillOPA/OPGA
ITEM 3: REPORT FROM CITY COUNCILORS
12, 2012
Mayor Bonebrake expressed appreciation for citizen comments and discussion held at the
Public Hearing on June 5.
ITEM : ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Ross moved for adjournment, seconded by s, Moberly.
YEA: Kelley, Ross, Moberly, onebrake
NAY: None
Motion carried 4-.
Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m,
Doug Bonebrake, Mayor/Chairman
Juliann M. Stevens, Deputy City Clerk
LIM
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
GENERAL
AEP/PSO
STREET LIGHTS
15.06
TREASURER PETTY CASH
CC REFUND/FORESTER
50.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
ASSESSMNT LTR REFUND
10.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
CC REFUND/STOUT
50.00
TOTAL GENERAL 125.06
MUNICIPAL COURT
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS-PIKEPASS FEE
2.80
CHARLES N. ROMANS
BAILIFF SERVICES
350.00
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA
YOUTH COURT
3,750.00
TOTAL MUNICIPAL COURT 4,102.80
MANAGERIAL
TREASURER PETTY CASH
PARKING REIMS/DOYLE
5.00
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
136.60
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS-PIKEPASS FEE
11.20
TREASURER PETTY CASH
PASTOR (MEETING EXPENSE
10.40
TREASURER PETTY CASH
CHAMBER LUNCHEON/STEVENS
10.00
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -'MA
50.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LEADERSHIP DEV MTG EXP
45.17
TOTAL MANAGERIAL 268.37
FINANCE
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
50.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
MILEAGE REIMS/KkMBALL
3.34
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS-PIKEPASS FEE
10.70
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELIAW - MAY, 2012
54.48
TOTAL FINANCE 118.52
HUMAN RESOURCES
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
45.66
URGENT CARE OF GREEN COUNTRY, P.L.L
RANDOM DRUG SCREENING
225.00
URGENT CARE OF GREEN COUNTRY, P.L.L
PRE-EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREE
275.08
AMERICANCHECKED, INC ATTN: BILLING
BACKGROUND CHECKS
424.25
TREASURER PETTY CASH
MILEAGE REIMB/SWANSON
16.65
TREASURER PETTY CASH
CHAMBER LUNCHEON/DEMPSTER
10.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OWASSO LUMBER-CONCRETE
58.44
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 1,055.0
HR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK QUIK STEEL-BANNER STEEL 427.20
TOTAL HR - CHARACTER INITIATIVE 427.20
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CINTAS CORPORATION
CARPET CLEANING
46.87
MCAFEE & TAFT
LEGAL
9,743.87
GRAND GATEWAY ECO. DEV. ASSC.
PELIVAN TRANSIT
4,939.30
ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS USAGE
279.80
Page 1
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
GENERAL GOVERNMENT...
HEARTLAND CONSULTING, INC
CONSULTING SERVICES FY12
10,500.00
TULSA COFFEE SERVICE INC
JAVA DAVES COFFEE
109.76
TULSA COUNTY CLERK
FILING FEES
160.00
XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER SERVICE
582.45
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC
COPIER SERVICE
394.64
MCAFEE & TAFT
LEGAL
4,450.85
MCAFEE & TAFT
LEGAL
90.00
MCAFEE & TAFT
LEGAL
373.80
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
161.49
JPJoIORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES
126.80
JF"ORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT- SUPPLIES
63.40
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
AMERICAN WASTE-REFUSE
141.19
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT x 32,164.22
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -AAA
150.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRUG WREHSE-FLASH DRIVE
13.01
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MA
73.55
TULSA COUNTYVIS
TULSA COUNTY LAND RECORDS
30.00
JFMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-SUPPLIES
3.76
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LORMAN ED-STRMWTR SEMINAR
349.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
APA-.MEMBERSHIP DUES
210.00
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
331.64
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,198.97
ENGINEERING
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LORMAN ED-STRJMWTR SEMINAR
199.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
JAMAR-SUPPLIES
124.19
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
76.02
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MA
76.85
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
563.93
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
191.67
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION
CELL BILL
59.52
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.40
SAV-ON PRINTING & SIGNS LLC
BUSINESS CARDS
30.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES
109.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT-SUPPLIES
9.99
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
LINIFORM RENTAL
13.20
TOTAL ENGINEERING 1,466.44
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MICROSOFT-TRITON LICENSE
259.00
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
66.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SKYLINE-CISCO SWITCHES
15,449.70
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
76.02
Page 2
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SUBWAY-EXTENDED HR MEAL
18.18
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
VERIFONE-PC CHARGE SOFT
546.00
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 16,415.57
SUPPORT SERVICES
JP.MORGAN CHASE BANK
CHEROKEE BLDG-TILES
162.72
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
WALJMART CORP SANS CLUB 77150903608
OPERATING SUPPLIES
152.76
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL FEES
38.50
KGK TILE INC
CLEAN GROUT CITY HALL BAT
600.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MURPHY FLOOR WAX/NH & OC
119.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK •
LOWES-NDP HEAD OC
4.98
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-DOOR REPAIR OC
26.82
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
4.90
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
547.65
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
91.56
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
166.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SCHINDLER ELEV-MAINT
845.79
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS-PIKEPASS FEE
2.30
A PLUS SERVICE INC
AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS
3,010.40
OKLAHOMA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS TULSA
DOC WORKER PROGRAM - MAY,
870.00
JFWORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT BULBS
6.34
TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES 6,688.40
CEMETERY
L & B DIRT PIT
DIRT FOR CEMETERY
45.00
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
94.70
VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
CEMETERY ELECTRIC
34.51
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GR CTRY SEPTIC-RENTAL
150.00
TOTAL CEMETERY 324.21
POLICE SERVICES
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS FEES
89.80
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
IPMBA-YEARLY DUES
55.00
WAL-WART CORP SANS CLUB 77150903608
OPERATING SUPPLIES
122.87
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
538.80
ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS USAGE
177.10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEAN STATION-DRY CLN
1,230.64
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
161.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALUART SUPPLIES
14.97
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE J MA
6,835.94
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - NA4Y, 2012
10,451.26
JPIIAORGAN CHASE BANK
DAVIS-UNIFORMi BARS
52.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OK POLICE SPPLY-NAME TAG
6.95
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
4,833.33
OKLAHOMA GANG INVESTIGATORS
CONFERENCE FEE
525.00
Page 3
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
POLICE SERVICES...
LAW ENFORCEMENT PSYCHOLOGICAL SERV
PSYCH EVALUATION
80.00
REGIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME
ROCIC DUES
300.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OWASSO FITNESS-MNTHLY FEE
165.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
IACP-CONFERENCE/YANCEY
275.00
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES 25,915.86
POLICE CCMAIAUNICATIONS
JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEAN STATION-DRY CLN
47.45
WAL{MART CORP SAMS CLUB 77150903608
OPERATING SUPPLIES
124.21
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART PRISONER BOARD
110.12
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOB BARKER-JAIL CART
150.51
TOTAL POLICE COIFAMUNICATIONS 432.2
ANIMAL CONTROL
JFIIAORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART-SUPPLIES
136.25
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-SUPPLIES
3.47
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
76.02
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
9.51
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN -MAY, 2012
261.84
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEAN STATION-DRY CLN
105.60
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS ANA
166.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HILLS PET-PET FOOD
561.82
OKLAHO6AANQAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION
OACA SPRING TRAINING
150.00
ANNE K. KARN
SPAY AND NEUTERING
570.00
TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL 2,041.18
FIRE SERVICES
ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS USAGE
408.57
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -IMA
1,166.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-FILTER
9.98
JANET M CASSELLS
ALTERATIONS
61.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
EQUIPMENT ONE-BLADE
7.00
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
51.13
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
5,455.63
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
CONRAD FIRE-PROT EQUIPMINT
170.00
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
342.11
JPIMORGAN CHASE BANK r
OFFICE DEPOT-SURGE PROT
31.99
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-TRIMMER LINE
14.97
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OWASSO FITNESS-MAY DUES
270.00
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE J MA
73.36
TOTAL FIRE SERVICES 8,"2.91
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNES
VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
ELECTRIC-STORM SIREN
20.89
VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
ELECTRIC-STORR&SIREN
20.40
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
4.44
Page 4
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNES
A PLUS SERVICE INC
A/C UNIT REPAIRS AT EOC
493.00
VERDIGRIS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
ELECTRIC BILL - STORM SIR
20.40
TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 597.14
STREETS
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -1 MA
1,166.67
TULSA COUNTY BOCC
MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS
82.00
TULSA COUNTY BOCC
MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS
2,013.70
SIGNALTEK INC
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
1,281.63
ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC
BARRICADE RENTAL -TRAIL
239.20
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BUMPER 2 BUMPER-BATTERY
69.95
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT LUBRICANT
1.68
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-TOOLS
52.42
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT FENCE SUPPLIES
45.55
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
32.24
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
28.22
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
1,378.39
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GRAINGER-GLOVES/EYEWEAR
56.60
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PMSI-EQUIPrIF_NT
186.40
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
SILVER CREEK LIGHTING
513.00
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
MAIN STREET LIGHTING
1,000.00
SIGNALTEK INC
FLASHING SCHOOL ZONE SIGN
15,372.50
AEP/PSO
STREET LIGHTS
5,609.75
JP.MORGAN CHASE BANK
RENOA&E-EQUIP & MATERIAL
1,716.00
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MA
5.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OREILLY PARTS
6.98
TOTAL STREETS 30,857.88
STORWVATER
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MIA
922.28
JFTIORGAN CHASE BANK
SMITH FARM-EDGER BLADES
45.52
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
P&K EQUIP-WEEDEATER HEAD
149.25
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES-CHAIN PARTS
63.84
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GRAINGER-GLOVES/EYEWEAR
56.60
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
P&K EQUIP-OIL MIX/BLADES
221.26
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS-BOOTS
129.99
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELIAN -.MAY, 2012
1,874.36
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
37.31
JPlMORGAN CHASE BANK
EQUIP ONE-REPAIR (MOWER
934.83
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
31.01
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
1,166.67
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SCIECA-STRMWTR CONFERENCE
335.00
TOTAL STORMWATER 6,0!05.93
Page 5
mot-
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
PARKS
BLAKE MITCHELL
MOWING AT SKATE PARK
60.00
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
16.55
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -1MA
333.33
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.75
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
OLENWASINGALE
MOWING AT ELWCREEK PARK
210.00
OLEN MASINGALE
MOWING AT ELWCREEK PARK
210.00
TUCKER CHEMICAL, INC.
RESTROOll SUPPLIES
1,050.10
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
12.75
JOSEPH SMITH
JANITORIAL SERVICE FOR PA
1,150.00
OLENIMASINGALE
MOWING ATATOR PARK 513/1
65.00
OLEN MASINGALE
WOWING AT CENTENNIAL PARK
650.00
OLEN MASINGALE
OWING ATATOR PARK
65.00
OLEN MASINGALE
MOWING AT CENTENNIAL PARK
650.00
OLEN MASINGALE
MOWING ATATOR PARK
65.00
OLEN MASINGALE
MOWING AT CENTENNIAL PARK
650.00
OLEN MASINGALE
MOWING AT ELM CREEK PARK
210.00
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN -MAY, 2012
799.04
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
5.71
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
P&K EQUIP-BLADES
14.34
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
P&K-CHAINSAW CHAIN
20.99
JP.MORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS-OIL
6.99
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MA
36.52
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OK MOBILE-CONCRETE
231.00
TOTAL PARKS 6,563.08
COMMUNITY CENTER
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
186.36
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
9.33
ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS USAGE
107.59
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT- SUPPLIES
81.13
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
50.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 434.41
HISTORICAL MUSEUM ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS USAGE 84.10
TOTAL HISTORICAL MUSEUM 84.10
ECONOMIC DEV
JRMORGAN CHASE BANK
IEDC-MEMBERSHIP DUES
345.00
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES
FUELMAN - MAY, 2012
54.19
VERIZON WIRELESS
WIRELESS CONNECTION
38.01
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS -iulA
50.00
JRMAORGAN CHASE BANK
BEST BUY KEYBOARD ACSRY
99.99
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEV 587.1
Page 6
Claims List - - - - - -
6/19/2012
TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICE 681.88
AMBULANCE
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
FULLERTONSUPPLIES
43.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
FULLERTON-OXYGEN
79.50
JPAORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
444.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
449.74
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
591.85
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
979.79
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
1,029.43
CITY GARAGE
VEH PARTS FOR RESALE - MA
253.80
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BOUND TREE-SUPPLIES
193.00
KATHY J WILLIANIS
INSPECTION
225.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SAFE KIDS-CERTIF FEE
50.00
CITY GARAGE
LABOR/OVERHEAD COSTS - MA
1,333.33
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LISPS-SHIPPING CHARGES
12.95'
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
KEN KOOL-AC REPAIR W
981.27
TOTAL AMBULI1kNCE
6,667.16
FUND GRAND TOTAL
7,349.0
E911 COMMUNICATIONS
INCOG-E911
911 DATABASE MAINT -JUNE
414.54
AT&T
E911 MAPPING FEES
355.35
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TOTAL RADIO-MAINT FEE
285.00
TOTAL E911 COMMUNICATIONS
1,054.89
FUND GRAND TOTAL
1,054.8
CEMETERY - CEMETERY JRkAORGAN CHASE BANK
3MSUPPLIES
231.76
TOTAL CEMETERY -CEMETERY
231.76
u
FUND GRAND TOTAL
231.7
HOTEL TAX - ECON IEV OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
2012 ECONOMIC FORECAST
3,500.00
Page 7
Claims List
6/19/2012
FUND GRAND TOTAL 580.7
CDBG - PARKS - CDBG-11 NATIVE SKATEPARKS, LLC.
SKATE PARK CONSTRUCTION
42,427.80
TOTAL CDBG - PARKS - CDBG-11 ~
42,427.8
FUND GRAND TOTAL
42,427.8
CITY GARAGE
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFOIaM RENTAL FEES
61.22
JFrMORGAN CHASE BANK
FULLERTON-SUPPLIES/GAS
25.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
FRONTIER INT-RADIATOR
1,498.56
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
7.35
ONEOK, INC OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS USAGE
96.34
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
UNITED FORD-PARTS RESALE
93.99
JFWORGAN CHASE BANK
CLASSIC CHEV-1 TON PART
126.00
T & W TIRE, LP
TIRES
1,290.16
TOTAL CITY GARAGE
3,199.12
FUND GRAND TOTAL
3,199.1
WORKERS' COMP SELF-INS
CITY OF OWASSO IMPRESTACCOUNT
WORKERS COMP CLAIMS
289.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORKERS COMP CLAIMS
359.00
CITY OF OWASSO IIMPRESTACCOUNT
WORKERS COMP CLAWS
323.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORKERS COMP CLANS
646.00
TOTAL WORKERS' COMP SELF-INS
1,617.00
WORKERS' COMP SELF-INS
UNITED SAFETY & CLAIMS INC
TPAADMIN FEES
1,610.00
Page 8
Claims List
6/19/2012
Budget Unit Title Vendor Name Payable Description Payment Amount
WORKERS' COMP SELF-INS.. CITY OF OWASSO IMPRESTACCOUNT WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 722.50
CITY OF OWASSO IMPRESTACCOUNT WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 2,518.90
TOTAL WORKERS'COMP SELF-INS 4,851.40
FUND GRAND TOTAL °'`~da•4
GEN LIAR-PROP SELF INS BEN MANGUS TORT CLAIM 1,975.97
TOTAL GEN LIAB-PROP SELF INS 1.975.97
ND GRAND TOTAL
ITY GRAND TOTAL
$212,766.1
Page 9
CITE! OF- O? ASSO
HEALTHCARE ELF I °U +qCE FUND
CLAIM' PAID PER AE" ry O F - :E #789 A OF 61; 112
-Efi-
DESCRIPTION
AETA
HEALTHCARE. MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE rDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
ADMIN FEES
STOP LOSS FEES
AL1. . 1 T AL
DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE
DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE
DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE
E L DEPT TOTAL
ASP
AC FEES
TTOTAL
HEALTHCARE SELF -,a FUND T011AL
l! T
20,535.99
36,726.71
25,292.75
46,673.77
45,972.96
20,907.96
16, 325.88
1,268.97
225,811.77
CITY OF OWASSO
HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND
CLANS PAID PER AUTHORIZATION OF ORDINANCE #789 AS OF 6/19/12
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
AETNA HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE
HEALTHCARE DEPT TOTAL
DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL'MEDICAL SERVICE
DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE
ADM1N FEES
DENTAL DEPT TOTAL
AMOUNT
14,233.74
39,600.99
24,224.00
34,794.56
112,853.29
3,730.40
3,952.68
2,248.25
9,931.33
VSP VISION MEDICAL SERVICES 1,567.50
VISION DEPT TOTAL 1,567.50
HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 124,352.12
CITY OF OWASSO
GENERALFUND
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/12
Department Payroll Expenses Total Expenses
Municipal Court
5,086.31
7,152.16
Managerial
19,359.45
27,063.10
Finance
13,110.91
20,321.67
Human Resources
5,868.68
9,853.62
Community Development
10,982.00
16,731.40
Engineering
14,613.32
22,059.34
Information Systems
9,921.25
15,873.72
Support Services
6,922.57
9,757.70
Police
149,897.78
203,764.05
Central Dispatch
23,379.95
35,558.19
Animal Control
2,218.40
3,620.72
Fire
89,998.77
134,417.35
Fire-Safer Grant
9,988.90
15,698.10
Emergency Preparedness
2,798.43
4,388.28
Streets
6,017.08
9,990.71
Stormwater/ROW Maint.
5,604.50
8,017.15
Park Maintenance
9,437.21
14,244.41
Community-Senior Center
3,101.76
4,831.32
Historical Museum
540.00
606.31
Economic Development
2,826.92
3,740.10
General Fund Total
391,674.19
567,689.40
Garage Fund Total _ 4,853.59 7,688.40
Ambulance Fund Total 23,655.02 35,734.01
Emergency 911 Fund Total - -
Stormwater Fund 27 Total
Worker's Compensation Total 2,308.79 2,751.29
Strong Neighborhoods 2,077.12 3,140.81
CITY OF OWASSO
GENERALFUND
FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012
Statement of Revenues & Expenditures
As of May 31, 2012
REVENUES:
Taxes
Licenses & permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines & forfeits
Other
TOTALREVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
Personal services
Materials & supplies
Other services
Capital outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES
TRANSFERS IN (OUT):
Transfers in
Transfers out
TOTALTRANSFERS
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE (GAAP Basis)
Beginning Balance
Ending Balance
FUND BALANCE (Budgetary Basis)
Beginning Balance
Ending Balance
MONTH YEAR PERCENT
$ 1,815,406
$ 18,330,313
$ 19,631,900
93.37%
16,061
158,875
201,400
78.89%
100,705
1,414,744
2,540,926
55.68%
51,649
469,677
517,600
90.74%
67,546
671,778
910,300
73.80%
2,217
136,837
151,258
90.47%
2,053,583
21,182,224
23,953,384
88.43%
1,034,352
12,343,612
13,956,495
88.44%
54,642
689,261
765,300
90.06%
115,771
1,393,517
1,715,192
81.25%
67,394
1,018,499
2,144,952
47.48%
1,272,160
15,444,888
18,581,938
83.12%
781,424
5,737,335
5,371,446
106.81%
991,084
10,767,748
11,601,600
92.81%
(1,610,203)
(16,796,139)
(17,965,700)
93.49%
(619,139)
(6,028,391)
(6,364,100)
94.72%
162,285
(291,056)
(992,654)
3,944,512
$ 3,653,456
2,344,066 2,344,066
$ 2,053,011 $ 1,351,413
oil
The Hr,-- Mayor and City Council
City o1, C - - -
Larry Langford
Director of Recr
and C 1* s
SUBJECT:
t
I June 15, 2012
_ -Lion to Dis_.. - _ .re orks
Staff recom enc. City Council authorization to discharge fireworks and approval of a public
fireworks display to be conducted on July , 2012 that will be free of charge to the public and
sponsored by the City of Owasso in celebration of Independence Day.
ATTACHMENT:
1. City of Owasso Code of Ordinances Relating to Fireworks
mI
I
CHAPTER 3
OFFENSES AGAINST THE PUBLIC
Section 10-301
Disturbing the Peace
Section 10-302
Insulting Signs, Literature or Language
Section 10-303
Literature or Language Ridiculing Religion
Section 10-304
Fireworks Prohibited
Section 10-305
Storing or Keeping Explosives
Section 10-306
Carrying Weapons and Exceptions; Transporting Concealed Handgun
Section 10-307
Display of Guns Unlawful
Section 10-308
Indoor Air Rifles and Archery Ranges Permitted
Section 10-309
Discharging Weapons; Throwing Missiles
Section 10-310
Reckless Conduct
Section 10-311
Loud Noise or Music Prohibited, Amplified Sound
Section 10-312
Noises
Section 10-313
Political Advertising on Rights of Way
Section 1-314
Remaining on School Property
SECTION 10-301 DISTURBING THE PEACE
A. It is unlawful to disturb or alarm the peace of another or others by doing any of the acts set out in
Subsection of this section.
B. Disturbing the peace is the doing of any of the following in such a manner as would foreseeably
alarm or disturb the peace of another or others:
conduct;
Using obscene, offensive, abusive, profane, vulgar, threatening, violent or insulting language or
Appearing in an intoxicated condition;
3. Engaging i a fistic encounter;
4. Pointing any pistol or any other deadly weapon, whether loaded or not, at any other person or
persons either in anger or otherwise;
5. Holding a unlawful assembly of two (2) or more persons, including being assembled together
and acting in concert, to o any unlawful act against the peace or to the terror of others or preparing for or
moving toward such acts, or otherwise assembling unlawfully or riotously;
6. Interrupting any lawful assembly of people by making noise, by rude, indecent or improper
behavior, by profane, improper or loud language, or in any other manner, either within the place of
assembly or within hearing distance thereof;
7. Making unnecessarily loud, offensive noises;
8. Disturbing any congregation or assembly of persons meeting for religious worship by making
noise, by de, indecent or improper behavior, by profane, improper or loud language, or in any other
manner, either within the place of worship or within hearing distance thereof, or
9. Committing any other act i such a manner as to unreasonably disturb or alarm the public.
(Ord 984, 4/18/11)
Page 10-14
SECTION 10-302 INSULTING SIGNS LITERATURE O LANGUAGE
A. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation within the city to display any sign, emblem,
badge, flag or device, which in its common acceptance is insulting, profane, or abusive to the citizens of
the city, and which is calculated, or of which the natural consequence is, to cause a breach of the peace or
an assault.
B. It is unlawful for any person to willfully use, utter, publish, circulate or distribute any
profane, violent, abusive, or insulting language or literature where:
1. A natural consequence of the language or literature is to cause a breach of the peace or
an assault; or
2. The language or literature, in its common acceptance, is calculated to cause a breach of
the peace or an assault.
(Prior Code, Sec. 14-58)
SECTION 10-303 LITERATURE O LANGUAGE RIDICULING RELIGION
It is unlawful for any person to utter, publish, distribute or circulate any literature or language
within the corporate limits of the city that casts profane ridicule o any deity, or any religion, which in its
common acceptance is calculated or where the natural consequence is to cause breach of the peace or an
assault. (Prior Code, Sec. 14-5)
SECTION 1-304 FIREWORKS PROHIBITED
A. Except as provided in Subsection of this section, the sale, use, display, firing, igniting,
lighting or discharge of fireworks within the city is unlawful and an offense.
B. The following are exceptions to the prohibitions in Subsection A:
I. The firing, igniting or lighting of the following are exempt from the prohibition
contained in Subsection of this section: sparklers, fountains, pinwheels and all such types of
fireworks that are not explosive or noise akin in character and are stationary. Not included i
this exception are Roman candles, bottle rockets ands rockets;
2. The city council may, for the common good, approve and sponsor a public display of
fireworks within the city celebrating dependence Day. The public display of fireworks must meet
each of the following requirements:
a. The group organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must obtain the city
council's specific approval for the event,;
b. The event must be open to the public, free of charge;
C. The use, display, firing, ignition, lighting and discharge of the fireworks must be
done in the presence of a authorized representative of the city fire department; and
d. The group(s) organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must indemnify and
hold the city harmless for any damage caused by the event and provide an insurance policy,
with the city named as an insured, covering and protecting the city from liability to the extent
it is not immune by state law.
Page 10-15
(Prior Code, Sec. 8-17; Ord. No. 354, 7/1/86)
Cross Reference: Dire Prevention Code, Section 13-101.
State Law Reference: Bottle rockets prohibited by state law, 68 O.S. Section 1624; State fireworks
licenses, 68 O.S. Sections 1621 et seq.; municipal power to regulate, 11 O.S. Section 22-110.
SECTION 10-305 STORING O KEEPING EXPLOSIVES
It is unlawful for any person to store or keep within the city any nitroglycerin, dynamite,
gunpowder, or any other highly explosive material or substance, except that gunpowder may be kept in
quantities of not to exceed five (5) pounds where the same is securely kept.
SECTION 10-306 CARRYING WEAPONS AND EXCEPTIONS; TRANSPORTING
CONCEALTI) HANDGUN
C. When the arresting officer determines that a valid handgun license exists, pursuant to
the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act or any provision of law from another state, for any person in the
stopped vehicle, any firearms permitted to be carried pursuant to the license shall not be
confiscated unless:
. The person is arrested for violating another provision of law other than that set
forth in subsection of this ordinance; provided, however, if the person is never charged
with an offense pursuant to this paragraph or if the charges are dismissed or the person is
acquitted, the weapon shall be returned to the person.
2. The officer has probable cause to believe the weapon is:
a. contraband; or
b. a fires used i the commission of a crime other than a violation of
subsection (B) of this ordinance.
C. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require confiscation of any
firearm,
(Ord. No. 854, 04/18/06; 984, 4/18/11)
Page 10-16
J:T
1
.,_.aey ~ a s_rrraaa3.
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Counc
City of Owasso
FROM: Larry Langford
Director of Recreation and Culture
SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Discharge Fireworks
Stone Canyon Public Fireworks Display
DATE: June 15, 2012
BACKGROUND:
The staff has received a request from Stone Canyon for an item to be placed on the City
Council agenda for consideration to approve the discharge of fireworks in celebration of
Independence Day. City Code requires approval from the City Council for any public display of
fireworks within the city limits. Attached is a copy of that section of the Code.
The representatives from Stone Canyon have spoken with representatives of the Fire Department
to coordinate the event and address safety concerns. All requirements established by the Fire
Department have been addressed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council authorization to discharge fireworks and approval of a public
fireworks display to be conducted on June 28, 2012 free of charge to the public and sponsored
by Stone Canyon in celebration of Independence Day.
ATTACHMENT:
A. City of Owasso Code of Ordinances Relating to Fireworks
B. Certificate of Liability Insurance
Offenses and Crimes
CHAPTER 3
OFFENSES AGAINST THE PUBLIC
Section 10-301
Disturbing the Peace
Section 10-302
Insulting Signs, Literature or Language
Section 10-303
Literature or Language Ridiculing Religion
Section 10-304
Fireworks Prohibited
Section 10-305
Storing or Keeping Explosives
Section 10-306
Carrying Weapons and Exceptions; Transporting Concealed Handgun
Section 10-307
Display of Guns Unlawful
Section 10-308
Indoor Air Rifles and Archery Ranges Permitted
Section 10-309
Discharging Weapons; Throwing Missiles
Section 10-310
Reckless Conduct
Section 10-311
Loud Noise or Music Prohibited, Amplified Sound
Section 10-312
Noises
Section 10-313
Political Advertising on Rights of Way
Section 10-314
Remaining on School Property
SECTION 10-301 DISTURBING THE PEACE
A. It is unlawful to disturb or alarm the peace of another or others by doing any of the acts set out in
Subsection B of this section.
B. Disturbing the peace is the doing of any of the following in such a manner as would foreseeably
alarm or disturb the peace of another or others:
1. Using obscene, offensive, abusive, profane, vulgar, threatening, violent or insulting language or
conduct;
2. Appearing in an intoxicated condition;
3. Engaging in a fistic encounter;
4. Pointing any pistol or any other deadly weapon, whether loaded or not, at any other person or
persons either in anger or otherwise;
5. Holding an unlawful assembly of two (2) or more persons, including being assembled together
and acting in concert, to do any unlawful act against the peace or to the terror of others or preparing for or
moving toward such acts, or otherwise assembling unlawfully or riotously;
6. Interrupting any lawful assembly of people by making noise, by rude, indecent or improper
behavior, by profane, improper or loud language, or in any other manner, either within the place of
assembly or within hearing distance thereof;
7. Making unnecessarily loud, offensive noises;
8. Disturbing any congregation or assembly of persons meeting for religious worship by making
noise, by rude, indecent or improper behavior, by profane, improper or loud language, or in any other
manner, either within the place of worship or within hearing distance thereof; or
9. Committing any other act in such a manner as to unreasonably disturb or alarm the public.
(Ord 984, 4/18/11)
Page 10-14
Offenses and Crimes
SECTION 10-302 INSULTING SIGNS. LITERATURE OR LANGUAGE
A. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation within the city to display any sign, emblem,
badge, flag or device, which in its common acceptance is insulting, profane, or abusive to the citizens of
the city, and which is calculated, or of which the natural consequence is, to cause a breach of the peace or
an assault.
B. It is unlawful for any person to willfully use, utter, publish, circulate or distribute any
profane, violent, abusive, or insulting language or literature where:
1. A natural consequence of the language or literature is to cause a breach of the peace or
an assault; or
2. The language or literature, in its common acceptance, is calculated to cause a breach of
the peace or an assault.
(Prior Code, Sec. 14-58)
SECTION 10-303 LITERATURE OR LANGUAGE RIDICULING RELIGION
It is unlawful for any person to utter, publish, distribute or circulate any literature or language
within the corporate limits of the city that casts profane ridicule on any deity, or any religion, which in its
common acceptance is calculated or where the natural consequence is to cause a breach of the peace or an
assault. (Prior Code, Sec. 14-59)
SECTION 10-304 FIREWORKS PROHIBITED
A. Except as provided in Subsection B of this section, the sale, use, display, firing, igniting,
lighting or discharge of fireworks within the city is unlawful and an offense.
B. The following are exceptions to the prohibitions in Subsection A:
1. The firing, igniting or lighting of the following are exempt from the prohibition
contained in Subsection A of this section: sparklers, fountains, pinwheels and all such types of
fireworks that are not explosive or noise making in character and are stationary. Not included in
this exception are Roman candles, bottle rockets and sky rockets;
2. The city council may, for the common good, approve and sponsor a public display of
fireworks within the city celebrating Independence Day. The public display of fireworks must meet
each of the following requirements:
a. The group organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must obtain the city
council's specific approval for the event;
b. The event must be open to the public, free of charge;
C. The use, display, firing, ignition, lighting and discharge of the fireworks must be
done in the presence of an authorized representative of the city fire department; and
d. The group(s) organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must indemnify and
hold the city harmless for any damage caused by the event and provide an insurance policy,
with the city named as an insured, covering and protecting the city from liability to the extent
it is not immune by state law.
Page 10-15
Offenses and Crimes
(Prior Code, Sec. 8-17; Ord. No. 354, 7/1/86)
Cross Reference: Fire Prevention Code, Section 13-101.
State Law Reference: Bottle rockets prohibited by state law, 68 O.S. Section 1624; State fireworks
licenses, 68 O.S. Sections 1621 et seq.; municipal power to regulate, 11 O.S. Section 22-110.
SECTION 10-305 STORING OR KEEPING EXPLOSIVES
It is unlawful for any person to store or keep within the city any nitroglycerin, dynamite,
gunpowder, or any other highly explosive material or substance, except that gunpowder may be kept in
quantities of not to exceed five (5) pounds where the same is securely kept.
SECTION 10-306 CARRYING WEAPONS AND EXCEPTIONS: TRANSPORTING
CONCEALED HANDGUN
A. It is unlawful for any person, except those persons authorized by law, to carry upon or
about their persons or in their vehicles any weapon of the kind usually known as slingshot, bowie
knife, dirk knife, switchblade knife, spring-type knife, knife having a blade which opens
automatically by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in the handle of the
knife, loaded cane, billy, metal knuckles, or any other offensive or defensive weapon, excluding
firearms, the carrying of which is governed by State law.
B. Any person stopped pursuant to a moving traffic violation who is transporting a
loaded pistol in the motor vehicle without a valid concealed handgun permit authorized by the
Oklahoma Self-Defense Act or a valid license from another state, whether the loaded firearm is
concealed or open in the vehicle, shall be issued a traffic citation in the amount specified by state
law, plus court costs, for transporting a firearm improperly. In addition to the traffic citation
provided in this ordinance, the person may additionally be arrested for any other violation of law.
C. When the arresting officer determines that a valid handgun license exists, pursuant to
the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act or any provision of law from another state, for any person in the
stopped vehicle, any firearms permitted to be carried pursuant to the license shall not be
confiscated unless:
1. The person is arrested for violating another provision of law other than that set
forth in subsection (B) of this ordinance; provided, however, if the person is never charged
with an offense pursuant to this paragraph or if the charges are dismissed or the person is
acquitted, the weapon shall be returned to the person.
2. The officer has probable cause to believe the weapon is:
a. contraband; or
b. a firearm used in the commission of a crime other than a violation of
subsection (B) of this ordinance.
C. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require confiscation of any
firearm.
(Ord. No. 854, 04/18/06; 984, 4/18/11)
Page 10-16
LC
x'
PP', is Gh'
.a
u
a
1
tr 17
'j
I
t
V
~1 v a
r- _
v rl
rs
!l a
:c
1-- t_ " )r _;n
T :
SUBJECT: DATE:
BACKGROUND:
Oklahoma Municipal Retirement Fund (OMRF), the retirement plan for non-police and fire
employees, requires the City Council acting as the OMRF Retirement Committee to approve
applications for retirement, To be eligible for retirement benefits through OMRF an employee
must have a minimum of five years of employment. Once an employee has five years of service
the employee is considered vested and upon leaving employment with the City has three
options depending upon age.
1. Normal Retirement is available to a vested employee age 65 or older.
2. Early Retirement is available to a vested employee between ages 55 and 65.
3. Deferred Retirement is available to vested employees under the age of 55. Deferred
Retirement allows an employee to "defer" retirement benefits until a future date, at
which time the employee would begin receiving monthly retirement benefits.
March 28, 2012 was the last day of employment for Scott Shadbolt, Public Works Department.
Mr. Shadbolt was a participant in the OMRF retirement plan while employed with the City for
fifteen years and has applied for, and meets the prerequisites for, Deferred Retirement,
June 1, 2012 was the last day of employment for Gary Collins, Information Technology
Department. Mr. Collins was a participant in the OMRF retirement plan while employed with the
City for seven years, and has applied for, and meets the prerequisites for, Normal Retirement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the following applications for retirement benefits; Scott
Shad bolt-Deferred Retirement and Gary Collins-Normal Retirement.
BACKGROUND:
Negotiations with the Owasso International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) have concluded with a
tentative agreement between both parties. The tentative agreement (ratified by the IAFF membership
on Tuesday, June 12, 2012) provides for a one year contract that continues the current compensation
plan, provides language clarification, improves incentives offered to those who conservatively use sick
leave, and incorporates a new physical fitness incentive. The IAFF members and the City administration
diligently focused on coming to agreement, during a year with more financial constraints than originally
expected.
The agreement provides for the following changes:
➢ Clarification of language addressing promotion rate increases and employee uniforms.
➢ Modification of scheduled overtime language.
➢ Removal of language requiring a release from a physician for any three absences in three
consecutive months.
➢ Increase in sick incentive payout for those who accrue the maximum sick leave and use less
than three shifts per year.
➢ Increase in vacation accrual for members with 25 or more years of service.
➢ Addition of a physical fitness incentive giving members the opportunity to earn comp time as a
reward for passing established fitness requirements.
Additionally, the contract includes language that, if approved, would allow fire personnel to receive a
pay increase if the City offers an across-the-board pay increase to any other City department during
the term of the contract that exceeds the average for IAFF members over the last three fiscal years.
The agreement does not contain any across-the-board increases and provides for a continuation of
existing contract language on all other issues.
The total increased cost of this contract is $45,826.
COMMENTS:
Credit for successful negotiations is due to both teams and their Chief Negotiators - Shane Atwell for the
IAFF and Warren Lehr for the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the 2012-13 contract between the City of Owasso and the International
Association of Firefighters (IAFF) Local # 2789 and authorization for the Mayor to execute the contract.
f ~
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Owasso
FROM: Rodney Ray
City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2012-06
FY 2012-2013 Annual Operating Budget
DATE: June 15, 2012
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to statutory and Charter provisions, an annual operating budget for the General Fund,
OPWA Fund, OPGA Fund and other funds has been developed and was transmitted for City
Council review on Tuesday, May 1, 2012. The proposed budget was discussed during the May
and June Council work sessions. Printed copies of the proposed budget have been available
for public viewing at City Hall and the Owasso Library. In addition, the proposed budget was
posted on the City's website and has been accessed approximately 240 times.
On May 24, 2012, legal notice of a public hearing was published in the Owasso Reporter, and
such hearing was conducted on June 5, 2012. The public hearing provided opportunity for
citizen comment and questions relating to the proposed budget and the City Council heard
from nine residents.
State statutes require adoption of an annual budget through a resolution no later than seven
days prior to the beginning of the new budget year (Title 11, Section 17-209A). Resolution No.
2012-06 with "Attachment A" (budget summary) provides the adoption of a fiscal year budget
for the General Fund and other funds of the City.
Based on discussions since the budget was originally presented on May l st, this recommended
budget has been amended as follows:
• Increase the operating transfer in to the general fund from the OPWA by $100,000 for a
total of $400,000;
Increase the sales tax revenue in the general fund by $90,000, increase the sales tax
transfer out of the general fund to the OPWA sales tax account by $90,000, and increase
the sales tax transfer in to the general fund from the OPWA sales tax account by $60,000;
• Increase the appropriation for expenditures in the general fund for personal services in
the police department by $109,000 and for personal services in the street department by
$51,000;
• Decrease the appropriation for expenditures in the hotel tax fund by $130,000; and
• Decrease the appropriation for expenditures in the park development fund by $50,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of Resolution No. 2012-06 adopting a Fiscal Year 2012-
2013 budget for the General Fund and all other funds of the City.
ATTACHMENT:
Resolution No. 2012-06
CITY OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-06
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND OTHER FUNDS AS
ESTABLISHED BY THE OWASSO CITY COUNCIL; ESTABLISHING LEVELS OF
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT AND ESTABLISHING BUDGET AMENDMENT
AUTHORITY AS PROVIDED BY STATUTE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS: The City of Owasso has adopted the provisions of the Oklahoma
Municipal Budget Act (the Act); and
WHEREAS: The City Manager has prepared a budget for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2013 (FY 2012-2013) consistent with the Act; and
WHEREAS: The Act provides for the City Manager, or designee, to transfer any
unexpended and unencumbered appropriation from one
department to another within the same fund; and
WHEREAS: The budget has been formally presented to the Owasso City
Council at least 30 days prior to the start of the fiscal year in
compliance with the Act; and
WHEREAS: The Owasso City Council published notice of a Public Hearing, and
conducted the Public Hearing on June 5, 2012, in compliance with
the Act.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA:
THAT: The City Council of the City of Owasso does hereby adopt the FY
2012-2013 Budget with total resources available in the amount of
$48,164,982 and total fund/departmental appropriations in the
amount of $48,164,982; legal appropriations are hereby established
as shown on "Attachment A" for each fund and department; and
THAT: The encumbrances and unexpended appropriation balances for
capital projects in the Capital Improvements Fund and CDBG Fund
for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 be and the same are hereby reappropriated
to the same funds, accounts and for the same purposes for Fiscal
Year 2012-2013 unless the project or purpose is designated or declared
closed or completed; and
THAT: The Sinking Fund Schedules for June 30, 2012 and Sinking Fund Estimate
of Needs for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013 are hereby approved to be
Filed with the County Excise Board; and
THAT: The effective date of this Resolution shall be July 1, 2012.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19`h day of June, 2012 by the City Council of the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma.
Doug oerae, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sherry Bishop, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
City Resolution No. 2012-06
Budget Summary - Fiscal Year 2012-2013
Appropriat n&y Fund & Department
General Fund--
Municipal Court
232,319
Managerial
791,552
Finance
569,346
Human Resources
r 347,162
General Government
498,190
Information Technology
534,085
Support Services
352,894
Community Development
475,530
Police Services
4,828,405
Police Communications
717,995
Animal Control
137,341
ft Services
4,353,116
Emergency Preparedness
131,079
Engineering
602,985
Streets
795,648
Stormwater
465,214
Cemetery
17,300
Parks
555,294
Community Center
161,414
Historical Museum
28,667
Economic Development
109,244
Interfund Transfers Out
19,375,000
Ambulance Service Fund--
Ambulance Operations
1,267,732
Ambulance Capital Fund--
Ambulance Operations
277,
Public Safety Capital Fund--
Police Services
330,20!0
4ke, Services
186,500
E-911 Fund--
Police Communications
266,145
Cemetery Care Fund--
Cemetery
3,600
Emergency Siren Fund--
Emergency Preparedness
10,000
Juvenile Court Fund--
Juvenile Court
8,000
Hotel Tax Fund--
Economic Development
103,750
Strong Neighborhood
118,007
Stormwater Management Fund--
Stormwater
1,069,823
Interfund Transfers Out
238,2QO
Capital Improvements Fund--
Police Services
700,000
Vehicle Maintenance
275,000
Streets
1,440,000
Parks
505,
CDBG Fund--
Streets
113,845
City Garage Fund--
Vehicle Maintenance
376,100
Workers' Comp Self-Ins Fund-i;
General Government
505,000
Gen Prop Liab Ins Fund--
General Government
200,
Healthcare Self Ins Fund--
General Government
3,942,
Sinking Fund--
General Government
148,50@
Total Appropriation
48,164,982
Attachment A
Res. 2012-06
1
DT
jnc~
- r
;t. Ina,,,
x x C -n
~1, , ,....;1 ,~:1.,..,.~ }Ill
u_ ) tral a
ann~
ICS
ire u ~ ~ ~ , r
-
ii
1 #ol
7~,
308
a~