HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001.06.12_Worksession AgendaPUBLIC OF OF
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TYPE OF MEETING: Special
DATE: June 12, 2001
TIME: 5 :30 pane. to 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: Owasso City Fall
Lower Level Conference Room
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Cleric and posted on the City Fall bulletin board
at 2:30 p.m. on Friday, June 8, 2001.
. 511511wlw
1, Call to Order
Mayor Barnhouse
1 Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to an Amendment to an Agreement for
Program Management Services Between Cowan Construction and the City of Owasso.
Mr Carr
Attachment #2
The Staff will. recommend City Council approval of an amendment to the Agreement for
Program Management Services Between Cowan Construction and the City of Owasso
relating to the construction of the City Fall /Police Station, in the amount of $49,920, such
amendment generated by the increased size and duration of the project.
Owasso City Council
June 12, 2001
Page 2
4. Discussion Relating to Lease Agreement with Owasso Land Trust.
Mr Ewing
5. Discussion Relating to an OPGA Fee Increase.
Mr Carlson
Attachment 45
6. Discussion Relating to Animal Ordinances (Bees)
Mayor Barnhouse
Attachz ,nent #6
Owasso City Council
June 12, 2001
Page 3
Report from City Manager
Mr Mitchell
A. Supplemental Appropriations
Adjournment.
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ,
• ; . BOUTWELL
CITY CLERK
DATE: June 8, 2001
Information and discussion relating to the following issues is planned for the Budget
Dearing /City Council work session on Tuesday, June 12 "' beginning at 5:30 p.m. and ending at
7®30 p.m. in the Lower Level Conference Room at Owasso City Hall.
Action Rel nt Services Agreement with
Cowan Construction - This item was tabled from the regular meeting on June 5 "'. See
attachment #2
1 Discussion Relating to Public Works Items I!/Ir Mitchell, TVIr Carr, Mr Ewing will
discuss several items relating to the wastewater master plan, the water master plan, the Elm
Creek Sewer Line payback, & future service fees. See attachment #3.
3. Discussion Relating to Lease A�ent with Owasso Land Trust m No background
information on this item was provided to the City Clerk.
4. Discussion Mr Carlson will present a proposed increase
in Greens Fees for the golf course. See attachment #5.
5. Discussion Relating _to Animal Ordinance (Bees) m This discussion comes as a result of the
presentation made at the work session in May by the Northeastern Oklahoma Beekeepers
Association. They would like the animal ordinance amended to allowing the beeping of
bccs within the city limits.
JUN-UU-CIwUI i C�; �)d WWtrl �, UN:) I NUU I I UN d�At>YUU F. Uj/Uj
0=9-50 CRY Hall, Mica Station, Community Center G-&01
Cowen Pay Application Summary
Through 4-30-01
Dater. fthernafft Dazign constmCu0n;
-- Dealan Mvelopment Docufhents e4dall"In consuwdan Expenses TOTAL
Mar-99
750.00
750.00
1'DW.00
1,080.00
300.00
Apr-W
0.00
May
2,970.00
2.970.W
Jun-99
0.00
Jul-99
0.00
Aug-99
0,00
SOP-99
14.430.00
7,216.00
qW.00
2,110.E
24,745.00
Oct-99
3> 7.50
3,607.50
NVII-99
0.00
Doo-99
3,607.50
B'WS.00
1,358.00
19. 50
Jan-00
5, .00
G,ODU.00
4,WO.00
10,000.00
F64-M
2,800.00
4,300.00
4,5W.00
11,600.00
Mav�w
205,00
SM.00
G,414,40
7,119.40
Apr -W
1, 00.00
2,500,00
MMY-W
0.00
Jun-W
2,240,00
9, .00
5,240.00
JUM
ORD
Aug -W
U00.00
3,000.00
9,000.00
SUP-00
2,445.60
6.000M
1,860.M
10,295.00
0.00
O. .00
1,199.56
7,133.58
5,5W.00
739.70
6.239.70
Jan-01
U00.00
43,25
6,043,25
Fab-01
0,00
Mar-01
OM
12. 00 .__j
M.17
13 9W 17
TOTAL
14,430-00
10, 8 .50
17,010,0
16,401.0
47,337-50
31,700.10
137,701.70
CONTRACT
105,180.00
18,0M.Ou
14,M0,00
TOW Paw
Thru 4-n-al
14.430-00
10 82Z50
17,010,00
16 40160
47.9 7.50
31,700.10
137,701,70
DMO'ence
76A)- w
4,357.50
1,080.W
(1,761.60)
21, Z50
4,788.00
30,677.30
TOTAL P.03
T AMENDMENT '` CONTRACT J PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SERVICES S L OWY CONSTRUCTION
ATE® Juno 1, 2001
On larch 16, 1999, City Council approved a contract revision with Cowen Construction for
Program Management Services associated with 1998 Bond Issue projects at the City Hall, Police
Department and Community Center, Cowen Construction has requested modification of this
agreement (see attachment 1).
At the time of negotiating this agreement, there were considerable uncertainties as to building
location, size and potential costs. As a result, the scope of services for the new City Mall /Police
Department stated
The Preli
Page 2
Amendment to Cowen Contract
The value of the project has increased by 13%
The value of the building was originally projected to be $4,800,000 with land
acquisitions. Present costs are approximately $5,416,000. This value represents a
13% increase.
Facility
Schematic
Design
Construction
Bidding
Construction
Total
Desi n
Develo
went
Documents
Pro osed
Actual
Pro osed
Actual
Pro osed
Actual
Pro osed
Actual
Pro osed
Actual
Pro osed
Actual
City
196
308
196
368
218
301
187
214
902
1516
1699
2707
Hall
156
26
225
26
140
21
152
140
752
239
1425
P26
LkLRenov
8
9
_ 8
17
22M
17
26
61
24
113
88
319
472
731
601
261
463
225
392
1103
2292
2051
4220
Cowen has reviewed their costs through March 31, 2001 and projected expenses through the
expected remaining duration. They have lowered their hourly rates to finalize the project at
minimum costs. To complete the project, Cowen has requested an additional amount totalling
$49,920.00.
FUNDING SOURCE.
Costs of this contract amendment will be funded from the 1.998 Bond Issue.
Staff recommends Council approve an increase to the Agreement for Program Management Services
with Cowen Construction in the amount of $49,920.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter from Cowen Construction dated May 14, 2001
ESTABLISHED 1896
I 1 10 W. 23RD ST.
PO Box 3465
TULSA OK[ -AHOMA
74101-3465
9 1 8-582-2220
FAX 91 B- 584-8922
7
May 14, 2001
Cedar City of Owasso
207 S.
P.O. Box • 0
Owasso, OK 74055
Attn: harry Mitchell
Re: Owasso City Fall & Police Station
Dear harry:
In response to our brief meeting concerns on the above referenced project last week,
and the scope of our contract versus the current scope of the project, we would like
to formally request an addition to our contract amount based on the following:
1. The size of the project has increased by 44 %.
2. The value of the project has increased by 13 %.
J. The duration of the project is scheduled to increase by 58 %.
(See attachments for support of the above issues "Scope change of
comparisons" "Hourly summary to date" and the "Agreement ".)
As the contract is based on hourly rates, we are willing to negotiate to a more actual
base rate to help soften the impact of this situation. They are as follows:
® Project Manager c@ $40.00 vs. $60.00 Contractual
Superintendent @ $32.00 vs. $60.00 Contractual
Based on the above we need to be compensated through the balance of constmction
closeout, punch list, etc., which we project to occupy our staff until 9 /30/01. Using
this date, we anticipate the following two requirements to complete this project:
Project: Manager 16 hours per weep average x 26 weeks
$40.00 = $16,640.00
2. Superintendent 40 hours per week x 26 weeks
@ $32.00 = $33,280.00
TOTAL ADD: $49,920.(Z iE'.
Mr. Larry Mitchell
May 14, 2001
Page Two
Please understand that we have lowered our rates to finalize the project at the
minimum cost we can afford, and the adjustment basically adjusts all hours
expended to these minimum rates.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Cc: enclosure
TO: LARRY h RY
Attached are proposals to update the 1991 Wastewater Master Plane proposals have been
received from Garver Engineers (Holloway, Updike and Bellen) and Montgomery - Watson (see
attached),
Work should be expected to be divided into the following phases:
Phase I — Expanded Elm Creek sewer basin
Phase II — Expanded basins west of U.S. Highway 169
Phase III — Consolidation of all basins
Phase IV -- Analysis of wastewater treatment requirements
Flow monitoring and modeling is needed to ensure adequacy of data throughout the collection
system. The 1997 raster Plan did not include flow monitoring and considerable conservative
engineering assumptions were made during the system analyses, To maximize use of technical
data, flow monitoring and a dynamic model of the system is a necessity that are included in this
update,
The costs proposed vary based on the scope of work defined by each firm, however, the task of
developing a common scope has not been completed.
aMONTGOMERY WATSON
Phase 2: Flow Survey and Analysis
1, Review sewer system maps and confirm flow survey plan.
I Carry out flow survey using 11 flow meters citywide together with 5 rain gauges over
a 2-month period.
3. Analyze all flow survey to select dry weather flows and storm events.
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
7-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Months
001volill'? IIIjj,)V;jjjVj! I'lolocts .911(1 Solutions WoOdIvIdo
101,0
360 996:3
v
d
2
�
9md
v
`V
�
a
C
O o b
N
U
U �
a
p
O a o
y A
A
N r
9md
v
`V
�
00
Q
N
N
O
O
e» o m M
ro
co �r o
m a eo v a� eo 'a
a'm
cr-
m m
cr w cp w
a
�
V
w
�
tw
®
m
�-- c�
off°
�
Ea a ro es <x r>-
m o
o'
= pa
o
er �--
_
C
N
ffY
O
C
C
In
ou
mEoSo
�o.
E
E
Z3
E
p:
iu zs
01
U 0. N
c
ro
d ¢[
Op
@
G Q 4 'O p
So
'O
@ @
2 .Q
13
E( N m C
QJ X N
O
to
B Q a
m O of iC i
E m
(y ) ym
eeaa f0 U m 'yLl C .Z�,
m
Z
c 3
m O U
'➢� Cm O
D
U O
„
Uv
p A
O N
E
u
N 2
U &
O
n
_ C
A® ,
m
A
O
{ U
O
0. E
C @
O✓ Q1
O1
W
�j m C_
° c
N
y m c o 9
LL c v m
Q @
6P1
C C
qq
NN
m w
rn�S.5�tn4
c@ w a m
m w� .0
��'a am�g
m m c
_C
y. m
O m m
N W} .!� N'
�
�N c:fi E
D. m o o
c:n c c E
m o o m
@
m.�
d
E N
m a:,.. o
N
48
C7 U< E
d- U
u)
O a Q
a E
C� Z di O Q 4 Q 6�
O 5_ Q
89 n. ii U
o
._ �,. Q z U.
„s Q to Q
m v m m m
n Q S af ¢ i7 O Q
ii
U
�
a°
o
N
N
0.
%
w
C4
m
O
IL V)
LO
o
U9
0 0
0 0 0
CD
OO
0
10
C
a. a.
WO
00
Q
-Op
cz�
w
393
' . S
. S
0 0
m
N
W
0 0 14 CO M
10 to QD
i iV j (D Co co
W m v N (N
'01(N
4w
ji
si
ou
o m
6
a) 8
E E 6
7E 0 o
Q E
a) w 2
E E
IH
76 27
a o
6: uj
2
rr-aa
22 32 3?
Oa
ao
O
0
m C)
LO
o
U9
0 0
0 0 0
CD
OO
0
10
a. a.
00
Q
-Op
cz�
w
393
' . S
. S
0 0
m
N
W
0
o
U9
0
10
a. a.
Garver, Inc.
0Iy 74 14fs -,21oG
nine imvot inc.cvm.
June b, 2001
F. Robert Carr
Public Works Director
City of Owasso
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
Re: Update of Wastewater faster Plan
Owasso, OIL
Dear Dr. Carr:
HECEIVED
This letter is our proposal for updating the City of Owasso Wastewater Master Plan.
Our approach and project tasks would be as follows:
A. COLLECTION SYSTEM
Flow Monitoring (Monitor 12 sites for 30 days)
Install 4 flow monitors for 30 days
Relocate flow monitors for 30 days
Relocate flow monitors for 30 days
2. Dapping
p Draw existing outfalls, interceptors, mains, pump stations, and force mains on
USGS quad maps.
Study Area and population
Determine (based on City direction) the limits of the new study area.
Project population and wastewater flows for each basin and sub - basin,
4. Evaluation of Existing System
w Develop a computer model of the existing outfalls, interceptors, and mains.
Based on flow monitoring and wastewater flow calculations, determine which
lines /pump stations are undersized.
Rc_'r` oninlended Improvements
a Evaluate alternatives for upgrading the existing system to meet current and
projected flows for 5 years, 10 years, and 20 years.
- Prepare preliminary routes for the recommended improvements.
- Prepare cost estimates for the recommended improvements.
- Prepare master plan exhibits for recommended 5, 10, and 20 -year improvements.
II',, iMood, IN -I AIi -I It nl:villo, /U ®I i111u Iinck. AI ® Mn,h ant, N1;= a I, M" ® !;Jl[ I. C11\
1 --. IRobcrt Carr
June 6, 2001
Page 2
i
N
!11
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PLANNING
I . Based on the updated service area project plant flows for S, 10, and 20 years.
2. Develop alternatives for treatment alternatives for flows above 3.3 mgd (Phase
IM capacity) including but not limited to:
Expansion of secondary plant and effluent pumping to another drainage basin.
Advanced treatment and discharge at existing site.
- Relocation of treatment plant.
Treatment of flows above 3.3 mgd by the City of Tulsa.
3. Determine capital, operation, and present worth cost of each alternative.
4. Evaluate the alternatives based on cost, environmental factors, public acceptability, and
workability,
5. Recommend an alternative. Prepare a preliminary layout of the selected alternative.
PROJECT PHASING
The plan update could be completed in phases as follows:
Elm Creek Basin (EC) 90 days
U.S. Highway 169 West (OW) Additional 60 days
Balance of Collection System and Plant Additional 90 days
FEE PROPOSED
Our proposed fees for the tasks set out in Sections A and B are as follows:
Task Description
A I Flow monitoring 30 days at 12 sites
A2 System Mapping
A3 Population/Flow projections
A4 Existing System Model. and Evaluation
A5 improvement Evaluation and Recommendations
B I -A Wastewater Treatment Plant Planning
I?r°oposed Y ee
$3,500 /site or $42,000
8,500
4,000
12,000
1 5,000
122500
Total Lump Scam Fee $94,000
F. Robert Carr
June 6, 2001
Page .3
We look forward to working with you on this study.
Sincerely,
r � !
(ay -Op
'tip e
Vice
Pre, ident S
7 1118 01 gars 1 \�
��2, �` Wkx
ff"1031
'ui
TIT
In December 1995, the City of Owasso entered into an engineering services contract for the
development of a wastewater collection master plan. On January 6, 1998, Owasso Public Works
Authority Resolution No. 98-01 adopted the 1997 Wastewater Master Plan as a policy statement
for the extension, expansion and development of privately-financed and publicly-financed
improvements of the City of Owasso municipal wastewater collection and treatment system.
It has been only three (3) years since adoption of the master plan. Population and wastewater
flow calculations included in the plan were based on land use and growth prqjections thought to
be valid at that time. Data were evaluated for a 5 -year, l0 -year, 20-year and ultimate conditions.
Attachment 1 identifies the area studied in the plan.
Page 2
Wastewater Collection issues
The Elm Creek Intercept-or was constructed in 1998 in conformance with the recommended
capital improvements detailed capacity of the
interceptor, as well as the lift station at the termination of the collection line, was based on
wastewater flow projected in the plan.
R
M awl LUM, M,
Below are some policy issues that will affect future decisions pertaining to wastewater collection
system needs and required improvements. The list is not i
Page 3
Wastewater Collection Issues
Who should pay for collection system (sewer line) extensions?
- Should user rates be established that will collect sufficient funds for future system
expansion?
® Should developers pay a reservation fee to ensure adequate capacity is available for
future growth?
Should the fees be allocated by drainage area or spread equally to all new
development?
10 1997 City of Owasso Wastewater Master Plan area
20 Elm Creek Interceptor memorandum dated March 10, 1998
30 OPWA Resolution 98-07
O ASSO, OKLAHOMA
RESOLUTION NUMB f9-0
r�
DATED this 15th day of December, 1998.
M-4
VISHIM
Cr" OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE Crff COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
01,CLA 'ti OMA, THAT:
AIN
acre assessments for recoupment of the costs associated with the Elm Creek Interceptor Sewer
Project be, and same hereby is approved.
ScGlign—TAQ: This ordinance shall become effective thirty days from the date of first
publication as provided by state law.
�Z
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk ma
Ronald D. -Cates, City Attorney
2780-362,ord
CTrY OF OWASSO, 01CLAHOMA
yo,
Denise Bode, Mayor
� , � � -�
�, ,,
1�� ��,�
�o:�.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Mitchell
City Manager
THRU: Stan Ewing
Director, Community Development
FROM: Donna Sorrells
City Planner
SUBJECT: Elm Creek Sewer Payback
Status Report
� 111i I 11511=11115 MIII .�
NM
Total Fees Collected to Date:
2. Fees in Arrears:
G—o�n--C@ony, subject to assigurnent (Area Q:
ROC Owasso IJ (Area J)-
Brentwood Village (Area N):
Nottingham ffl, IV, V (Area 0):
Total Fees in Arrears to Date:
40,400.60
14,931.00 (partial)
23,700.00
136,022.20
7,110.00
$21,677.60
11,692.00
32,358.40
88,685.40
3. Fees A eviewe d. or discussed):
Denali Heights (Area G): 031,600.00 ® 60 Taps @ $24,000) $ 7,600.00
Church of the Nazarene (Area P): 23,731.60
Preston Lakes H (Area R): 51,334.20
Central Baptist Church (Area R): 23,731.60
19300
179028
283,262040 Offset- $100,800
0 'Taps w 24,000
15$9462040
1409
14.9
23,542.00
23,542,
80.0
(0)
0.00
00
13900
139.0
219,620.00
219,6200
0
85,4
10
15,800.00 4 Taps - 1,600
14,2 000
H
20807
(0)
0.00
0,
1
2506
0
0.00
0.
1
1703
(0)
0.00
00
4000
40,0
'63,200.00
63,2
L
1500
0
0.00
Oo
20500
20500
323,900.00
323,9
20,5
0
0.00
00
0
1031
4707
74,370°60
749370060
500
0
0000
00
1705
17.5
27,650000
279650000
16000
2109
34,60100
34,602000
S
17800
17800
281,240000
281,240.00
Total Value:
$1,477,3790
Total Fees Anticipated in Future:
$1,282,179000
Grand Total (Itenis I through ):
$1,871,140 ®37
OPWA SEWERLINE EXTENSION FUND.
PROPOSED BUDGET
FY 2001-2002
($340,000)
a yJ I z, 1 -0 W W fwa
Connection Fees 130,400
Debt Service 313,076
NPAR =� MR, 91.- M. MWER
PROPOSED NET Ll 2,676}
*The Sewer Line Extension Fund is used to account for the revenues and debt service associated
with the Elm Creek Sewer Interceptor Project.
M
M-
0
00)
0)
0
0
1—
00
(0 rl-
co
C�
C
B 014
0
0
0 CD
0 LO
(D
LO
c)
C14 00
N
� C)
M-
0
0
0
q Iq
C�
C
B 014
0
0
0 CD
0 LO
(D
LO
N
(6(6
C\f
co
'IT
CO
—0—co
C) 'IT
era
6 li
of-
4
N
0
LL
co
I,-
re
CM
m
m
m
co
V7
cq Iq
()3
cu
m
0
®
C) co
14,
w
0)
P- co
m
(D
0 0
Nt
It
l3i Iq
Wi
w
0)
0)
cq CN
Lo
0
0
0
p (D
0
(D
z
0
(D a C)
0
.0
(a)
0 U)
LL
-0
(a
co a.
E
0
-0
a)
:0 j� U)
CR
a)
'E
o
c ID a)
—
—
®
(n
(D E
m
I
0 <
-i
0 >
>
w rL
I-
0
-1 0
0
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA DRAFT
rummot"I
WHEREAS,
wastewater sewer system in the Elm Creek Drainage Basin to serve the area defined in
Resolution 98-07 by the Owasso Public Works Authority as shown in exhibit "A!'attached; and,
WHEREAS, the Elm Creek wastewater collection system may ultimately serge areas
outside of the area shown in said Exhibit "'A ;" d,
WHEREAS, additional costs will be required to serve properties outside the area shown
in Exhibit 'W' by either gravity or fora; mains; and,
WHEREAS, by virtue of representation, on the part of the developers and owners of
property lying within the Elm Creek Drainage Basin, the Owasso public Works Authority, on
behalf of it's beneficiary thereof, the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, should provide a mechanism
for recouprnent of the cost associated with the Elm Creek Sewer System; acrd,
WHEREAS, the Trustees of the Owasso public Works .Authority by virtue hereof hereby
create a mechanism for reeoupment of the estimated $1,200,000 °00 associated with the Elm
Creek wastewater collection system resulting from connection by areas beyond the area
illustrated in Exhibit "A,"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE S Y TME T S` EES OF THE
OWASSO PUBLIC WORICS AUTHORITY, O-
Section 1. That the ` mstees of the Owasso Public `Forks Authority hereby establish the
assessment area being any area outside the boundary illustrated in Exhibit "A" which connects to
the Elm Creek wastewater system.
Section 2° That the portions set forth beyond the area identified in :exhibit "A" hereto,
same being the assessment area shall be assessed costs in the amount of $2,000 °00 per acre
adjusted annually by five (5 %) percent for recoupment of the costs associated with the Elm
Creek wastewater system. Said assessment shall be due and payable only upon the connection of
any development properties connecting to the Elm Creek sewer system.
H:\ stanR ewing\ I' tdblicWorks \EImCreekminterceptor \New- Resolution.doe
DATED this day of .2001
m-
M�ll
Marcia Boatwell, Secretary
REVIIEA WED AS TO FORM.
Ronald D. Cates, Authority Attorney
H:\stan_ewing\PublicWorks\ElmCreek-Intereeptoi-\New-Resolution.doc
LIN
0 INANCE NUMBER X�V-I A
D" k RAFT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, THAT:
- --- -------- ----
TON1704-11211 M1,
XCELLS LuL
Wastewatier System be, and same hereby i's approved.
Sectign TwQ: This ordinance shall become effective thirty days from the date of
publication as provided by state law,
DATED this the — day of
ATTEST:
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ronald D. Cates, City Attorney
H:\stan—ewing\PublicWorks\E]mCreek-Interceptor\Ordinance.doc
Em
CITY OF AS O, OKLAHOMA
B y.-
Mary Lou Banihouse, Mayor
I
a
MIA �r
Steve Compton
w.
PO Box 397
Owasso, 05
UMMEMM
Elm Creek Interceptor Project
Nottingham III, IV & V
It has come to my attention that we have not received the Elm Creek Interceptor Payback
for Nottingham III, IV & V. The outstanding fee is $88,685.40 based on the total subdivision
acreage's of 1 17.32 for Nottingham III, 14017 for Nottingham ICI and 24,64 for Nottingham V for
a total 56013 acres times the per acreage fee of $1,580.00. I would like to receive this payment
as soon as reasonably possible, hopefully by May 15, 20010
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
COPY
Stan Ewing, Director
Community & Economic Development
Cc: Larry Mitchell, City Manager
Phil Lutz, Project Engineer
Sherry Bishop, Finance Director
City of Owasso
207 South Cedar
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
Roy Stanley
Lindsey Management
C/o The Greens at Owasso A
PO Box 13000 -
17ayetteville, AR 72703
im
Since my last letter to you, I have come across a cost pro-ration schedule that shows that
the $120,336.77 has been paid to the City of Owasso. There was $105,986.77 paid on the Ehn
Creek Interceptor agreement and $14,350.00 escrowed for the construction of
acceleration/deceleration lanes on E. 86'h to N. I
There are a few remaining conditions of approval on the Greens at Owasso Planned Unit
Development that have not been accomplished to date. I have attached the entire list of approval
conditions and would like to review the conditions relating to roadways and sidewalks, I will go
item by item as contained in the conditions of approval:
N. "The inclusion of sidewalks along abutting arterial streets and the interior drives within
the proposed development." Sidewalks have not been constructed along E, 86h St. N.
and there are no connecting sidewalks running along the north-south entry drive
connecting to.E. 86h St. N.
0. "The realignment of the E. 86'h SL N. access near the Eight Grade Center, eliminating the
offset,"' This construction has not been accomplished.
P. "Left turn lanes for both eastbound and westbound traffic along E. 86 St. N. at the
Eighth Grade Center access location." This construction has not been accoinplished.
"Signalization at the Eight Grade Center access location when traffic loads warrant. " To
my knowledge, no warrant study has been done.
I would like to discuss these items with you as we move forward with the next apartment
phase of development.
Cc: Larry Mitchell, City Manager
Tim Rooney, Assistant City Manager
Sherry Bishop, Director of Finance
Phil Lutz, Project Engineer
Donna Soffells, City Planner
Encl.: Cost Pro-ration
OP -98 -01 Conditions of Approval
f
DATE: May 299 2001
JANUARY 269 2001
The first agenda included are overview ®f rraartagement philosophy and approach
to planning by Lai y Mitchell. Discussion items set for the agenda were as follows:
� t �1 .Ii
MARCH 169 2001
The agenda for the March meeting was as follows:
1. Evaluation of the Current Annexation Palley
2, Elm Creek Interceptor /Wastewater° Master Plan
3, Enforcement options for Final Residential building Perm-its
4. Other business /Agenda items for the next meeting
5. Future Meeting Tate
1. Proposed Earth Change Ordinance
2. Update on the 76th Street and Owasso Expressway improvements
3. New Business
4® Future Meeting Date
MAY 18, 2001
The agenda for this meeting was as follows:
I . Elm Creek Interceptor Payback Program — Rules of the Game
2. Bond Projects
3. New Business
4. Future Meeting Date
On February 20, 2001, the City of Owasso formally adopted the 2001 Water Master flan
prepared by Montgomery - Watson as the policy statement for development, expansion and
extension of publicly - financed improvements to the municipal water system. Details of the plan
were based on expansion of service using the present source of wholesale water supplied by the
City of Tulsa. The plan included phased improvements over a 20 -year period as follows:
Phase Tire of Phase Proaected Cost of
�Irn rp overz�ents
City staff met with various entities to determine availability of water rights or the ability to
purchase raw water. Discussions were held with the Oklahoma Water resources Board, Rogers
Rural Water District #5, the City of Collinsville and the City of Tulsa. At this time, sources of
raw water may be able to be secured through an option with the City of Collinsville (capable of
providing only a portion of the needed capacity) and by purchase contract with the City of Tulsa.
Page 2
Water Plan Options
Neither option have been fully-developed; however, as time has been spent in this matter, more
detailed needs and costs have been defined and assembled. Costs of construction and 20-years of
operations and maintenance expenses for both a new water treatment facility and master plan
improvements to our present system have been evaluated.
Details of each alternative are included in the attachment.
Based on present worth costs analysis, over the 20-year period, both alternatives are considered
to essentially equal. The difference in up-fi -orit capital investment is a significant consideration.
A calculation of cost per 1000 gallons of the alternatives was also made. Comparison of these
3
(D
Q
25
ITEM
New Water
Master Plan
Item
Treatment Plant
Alternative
lternative
Capital Expenditures
Initial
$29,990,000
$12,801,000
Year 5
$969,269
$969,269
Year 10
$8,596,298
$4,728,365
Year 15
$475,446
$475,446
Year 20
$2,822,812
$ -
Capital costs
$42,854,000
$18,974,000
(present worth over 20 years)
Operation & Maintenance costs
$18,892,000
$39,724,000
(present worth over 20 years)
Total Present Worth Cost
$6197469000
$58969 '000
Details of each alternative are included in the attachment.
Based on present worth costs analysis, over the 20-year period, both alternatives are considered
to essentially equal. The difference in up-fi -orit capital investment is a significant consideration.
A calculation of cost per 1000 gallons of the alternatives was also made. Comparison of these
3
(D
Q
25
ITEM
Page 3
Water Plan Options
data indicate that the new water treatment plant will become cost - effective in 16 -years (if all
assumptions made in the analysis are achieved).
Based on the analyses performed, staff recommends proceeding with the improvements proposed
in the 2001 Water Master Plan,
10 2001 Water Master Plan — Executive Summary
2, Comparison of Distribution system Upgrade alternatives --- 800 MGD Water Plant
3. Owasso Water Supply Options -- Costs per 1000 gallons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Owasso has a population of approximately 15,000 people. The City obtains water
solely from the City of Tulsa. Owasso has experienced rapid growth over the past ten years
and will most likely continue to experience continued strong growth over the next 20 years.
The City requisitioned this Master Plan to provide recommendations for developing the
necessary facilities to supply water to City customers through the year 2020.
The objective of this Water System Master Plan is to provide the Owasso Public Works
Department with an evaluation of the existing water system's ability to adequately provide
water under existing conditions as well as to the year 2020. This evaluation will determine
the suitability of the existing water sources, pipelines, storage tanks, pumps, and control
valves to provide adequate pressures and flows under both existing and 2020 conditions.
A computer model of the entire water distribution system, including every transmission and
distribution system pipeline was created using H2ONET by the City of Owasso in 1997.
H2ONET is a hydraulic and water quality network model that operates in the AutoCAD
Windows environment.
TER SYSTEM FINDINGS
The Owasso water distribution system findings were as follo,,vs:
1. The inlet pressures from the Tulsa system are critical to the Owasso water- distribution
system. When the inlet pressure at the meter connections is between 115 psi and 150 psi
this pressure is satisfactory for meeting the minimum hydraulic criteria. However, when
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
the pressures fall below 110 psi on a peak day the 169 storage tank cannot be filled nor
can system pressures be maintained above 35 psi.
2. Numerous closed valves were located in the distribution system. When the valves were
opened the system pressures were increased by 25 psi.
3. The ground elevations in the City of Owasso range from 579 feet to 730 feet. The
changes in ground elevations warrant the creation of a high pressure zone and a low
pressure zone.
4. The current storage tanks do not cycle (fill and empty) on an average demand day. This
leads to stagnant water and lowered disinfectant residuals. The lowered disinfectant
residual could have potential negative health impacts.
5. The existing transmission mains are under sized to handle the capacities required on a
peak demand day,
Facilities recommended for the Owasso distribution system are as follows:
Create a new pressure plane (upper pressure plane) including the area north of 86th street
as well as a small area south of 86th street (shown in the Owasso Water .Atlas in grid 292
B and D).
Abandon the existing booster station (this area will be served by the upper pressure
zone).
® Abandon the HWY 169 Tank. The hydraulic grade line (1- GL) in the new upper pressure
plane will be such that the existing 169 Tank would stay full under all normal operating
conditions. This would likely lead to difficulties in maintaining the disinfectant residual
and possibly lead to taste and odor problems.
® Construct a new 2.0 MG elevated storage tank in the upper pressure plane. The proposed
location for the new elevated storage tank is east of Garnett road midway between 96"'
Street and 106th Street in the Ator Heights area. This location was selected because the
elevations in this area are the highest in the Upper Pressure Zone. The operating levels of
the new elevated storage tank are:
Ground Level at Tank:
715 beet
Bottom Water Level:
815 Feet
Overflow Water Level:
860 Feet
The height of the proposed storage tank is 140 feet. This height is within the normal
range for the elevated tanks. If the location of the proposed new tank is changed and the
total heiolht of the tank increases beyond 150 feet, then the cost will increase
approximately $60000 for every foot above 150 feet.
MONTGOMERY WATSON ES -2
EXECUTIVE
® Construct a new in -line pump station at the site of the current 10 -inch meter connection
to Tulsa to serve the upper pressure :cone. The new pump station will be configured as
follows:
There will be two 100- horsepower pumps (one duty pump and one standby pump).
Space will be provided in the pump station layout for future additional pumps in
2015.
A bypass line will be included in the pump station since much of the time the upper
pressure zone will be served directly from Tulsa pressure without any pumping.
Pumping will not be required during low demand periods. In high demand periods,
pumping will only be required during the day when the Tulsa supply pressure drops.
A storage tank is not required at the new pump station. The supply pressure from the
Tulsa meter connection_ is adequate to use an in -line pump station.
The lower pressure zone was designed such that no pumping is required, even in peak
demand conditions. A pressure - reducing valve (PRV) will be used to control pressures in
the lower pressure zone. The PRV settings will be 90 psi during low demand periods and
120 psi during peak demand times. This PRV will be located in the new pump station for
convenience of access and maintenance.
® Abandon the Ator Tank. The elevation of this tank is such that it cannot be used as usable
system storage. Consideration was given to using the Ator tank as a supply tank for a
transfer pump station between the lower and upper pressure planes. However, the
recommended new pump station discussed above does not require a tank.
Remove existing PRVs and control valves downstream of the Tulsa meters (except for
the new PRV in the new pump station described earlier.) This will allow the lower
pressure plane to be fed from the Tulsa system pressure without any pumping.
® The proposed improvements will require the construction of new transmission mains. The
existing transmission mains will need to be paralleled with new pipes to increase the
capacity of the existing system. New transmission mains will need to be constructed to
extend to areas outside the Owasso service area.
The inlet pressure from the Tulsa meter is critical to the lower pressure zone. It is
recommended that pressure monitoring devices are installed that will electronically log
the inlet pressures from Tulsa. This will document the pressure changes from Tulsa under
different demand scenarios. If the inlet pressures fall below 70 psi then the lower pressure
plane may require pumping on pear demand days.
CAPITA. IMPROVEMENT PLAN COSTS
The capital improvement plain (CIh) was divided into five phases. The cost for each phase
can he seen below in Table ES-1. Figure S -6 (located at the back of this report) shows the
locations of the major infrastructure improvements.
Phase I of the CIh are the improvements necessary to address the needs of the existing water
distribution system. These i111provenlclits will allow Owasso to meet the hydraulic criteria oil
MOIJTGOMERY WATSON ES -3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
a peak demand day. The improvements include the creation of a new pressure plane, a new
booster pump station, a 2.0 MG elevated storage tank, and paralleling the existing
transmission mains.
Phase II of the CIP includes replacing all pipes less than 4- inches, the replacement of the
existing 10 -inch meter with a 24 -inch meter, and a new transmission main. Phase III of the
CIP are the installation of new transmission mains in areas where there is currently no
development. Phase IV of the CIP includes the installation of two more pumps at the booster
pump station, and new transmission mains. Phase V of the CIP requires new transmission
mains.
MONTGOMERY WATSON ES-4
City of Owasso
Comparison of Distribution Svstern
mga,riaier viani;#uternauve
N v
ew WTP Master Plan
Alternative Alternative J
City of Owasso
REVISED
Comparison of Distribution System Upgrade Alternatives
8.0 mgd Water Plant Alternative
Capital Cost Expenditures
Costs in y
ear 0 dollars
Present Worths
Data
New WTP
Master Plan
New WTP
Master Plan
Item
Source
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Year 0
8 mgd pump station at Lake Oolagah & line tap
WSD
$
700,000
30" parallel raw water line (52000')
[d]
$
6,240,000
8 mgd treatment plant (expandable to 12 mgd)
[d]
$
9,000,000
30" treated water line (30,000')
WSD
$
3,600,000
Bores & miscellaneous
WSD
$
150,000
Right-of-way acquisition
WSD
$
200,000
Engineering design
WSD
$
680,000
Construction administration & inspection
WSD
$
380,000
Legal
WSD
$
70,000
Contingencies
WSD
$
770,000
Purchase site for treatment plant (40 ac)
[a]
$
200,000
Distribution system projects 1 thru 18 [b] [c]
MP
$
8,000,000
$12,801,000
Total for Year 0
$29,990,0-66--$1
1,000
$ 29,990,000
$12,801,000
Year 5
Distribution system projects 19 thru 21
MP
$
1,134,600
$ 1,134,600
Total for Year 5
$
1,134,600
$ 11134,600
$ 969,269
$ 969,269
Year 10
Expand WTP from 8 mgd to 12 mgd
[d]
$
5,000,000
Expand pump station at Lake Oolagah to 12 mgd
[d]
$
300,000
Distribution system projects 22 thru 41
MP
$
6,479,000
$ 6,479,000
Total for Year 10
$11,779,000
$ 6,479,000
$ 8,596,298
$ 4,728,365
Year 15
Distribution system projects 42 thru 46
MP
$
762,600
$ 762,600
Total for Year 15
$
762,600
$ 762,600
$ 475,446
$ 475,446
Year 20
Expand WTP from 12 mgd to 16 mgd
[d]
$
5,000,000
Expand pump station at Lake Oolagah to 12 mgd
[d]
$
300,000
$
5,300,000
$ 2,822,812
Total Present Worth of Capital Costs�a.,�
$ 42,853,825
$18,074,080
"Real discount rate" for present worth calculations = 3.2 %, per Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -94
-i y of OaassO REWSED
on pwmon of Dmtnbvtiorl System Upgracta Afternallves
.0 mgd Water Plano Altemattve
Day De°-M (rid)
yen pr dune Plan )Aa< Day Demand fr gd)
',I- Pre;sIre Plain 9Aax Day Demand jm9d)
yew P:a-t Capacity (mad)
'yxctrum Tulsa Derr +ery (mgd)
S
6'8 j
5.9
1.7
8 i
0.0 i
7'2
5.4
1.8 d
'i,
8
0.0
sS
7.5
56 1
1.9 i
3
0.0i
9�
7.9
59
2.0
8
0.0 3
8.3
62
2.9
8
0.3
8,7
8.5
2.2
8
07
9.9 t
S.8
2.3 1
8 9
;,a 9
3
9.6
7.2
2.4
8
1.6
40.0
7,5
2.5
8
2.0
40.5
7.9
2.6
8
2.5
a4.a
8.3
2.8
12
0.0
11.6
8.7
29
12
0.0
12.1
g. e
3,0
72
0.7
12.7
9.5
3.2
72
0.7
93.3
0 0
3.3
42
1.3
Sd O
10 5
35
72
2.0
td 7
9 t 0
3.7
12
2 7
155
19 5
38
92
3 a
2 1
40
0.1
_
Ii
,; y
nnua7 Usage:
6.5
i
7,2
Id
91.0
11.6
12.1
12.7
13.3
14.0
14.7
16 4
7wer Pressure Plane Max Day Demand (mgd) 1,7 7.8 0
1.9
2.0
2.9
2.2
2,3
.rage Day Demand (mgd)
ra:r; !✓afar Usage (mgd)
u:a Y✓a'yr Usage (-91)
f
11
2,28
2.28
0,00 $
2.39 3
2.39
0.00 I,
i@
2.51
2.51
0,00
2.63
2.63
0.00
2.76
2.73
0.03
;
2.90 gy
2.83 g
OA7 E)
3.04
2.93
0.11
3,19
3.03
0.16
3.34
3.14
0.20
3.50
3.25
0.25
3.68
3.68
0.00
3.85
3.85
0.00
4.04
4.03
0.08
4,24
4.17
0.07
4.45
4.34
0, y3
4.67
4.47
020
4.89
4.63
0:7
5.13
4.79
0 34
5.38
5.37
0 37
�5
r
)eM Costs:
3
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.5
3.7
4.2
¢
a
9.6
10.0
10.5
11.0
17.6
92.9
.aa wow ✓umP slaisxt OLBA Z Power
rLat-.e-)t pbr! pacer
ratmemtt plan! hoar
r_atmerrt plant ehernF-ak
reatmant plant re'p-
r ea4mant plant ndsce,7aneous
zw water fees to Tulsa
/lter suppFy Sees b Tula!
>al OMA Cost
(aj
WSD g
WSD
WSD
WSD
WSD
j [cj
g 101
66,609
920,000
200,000
940,000
900,000
50,000 !1
966,524
-
843.933.
69.863
173,276
988,793 §
332,155
94,397
47,198
574,659
-
820.342
73,276
x98,830
196 0 6
138,699
55,008
49,504
183,393
-
866@37
76,856
924,614
207,690
145,383
103,845
59,922
992,140
-
c,ro 4v1
80,693
129,367
295,613
950,928
107,806
53,903
999,469
19,551
0570fld
84,549
933,835
223,060
956,742
399,530
55,765
206,360
477 609
9n
88,679
938,524
230,873
169,63'3
115,437
57,718
293,588
77 038
an nco
93,091
943,447
239,068
167,348
319,534
59,767
229,169
907,964
..�. ....,
97,555
146,598
247,663
973,364
123,832
61,916
229,129
140,278
.140.278
902,329
154,007
256,678
179,675
928,339
64,170
237,469
974,234
.2222_.
107,399
974,006
290,010
203,007
145,005
72,503
268,298
-
912.562
982,507
304,178
212,925
152,089
76,044
289,405
118,061
990,809
318,016
222,691
159,008
79,504
294,206
8.982
923,828
197,355
328,925
230,248
164,463
82,231
304,299
50,076
129,877
204,221
340,3fi8
238,258
170,184
85,092
314,685
93,976
136,222
211.422
352,370
246,659
176,985
88,093
325,989
138.383
142.877
218,975
364,958
255,471
182,479
91,240
337,631
185.797
949,857
226,897
378,761
264,713
189,081
94,540
349,849
349 849
951,177
254,944
423,573
296,501
219,785
105.893
391,860
91 860
trsVBr
262,858
438 O9'
306,663
219049
109,524
40.5,90
--.m Day Demand (mgd) 6.8 72
7.5
7.9
8.3
8.7
9.1
- 9.6
90.0
10.5
pper Pressure Plane M= Day Demand (mgd) 5.1 ] 5.4
5.6
5.9
6.2
6.5
6,8
7,2
91.0
11.6
12.1
12.7
13.3
14.0
14.7
16 4
7wer Pressure Plane Max Day Demand (mgd) 1,7 7.8 0
1.9
2.0
2.9
2.2
2,3
24
7.5
7.9
8.3
8.7
9.1
9.5
10.0
90.5
11.0
72.7
:axtrnum Tulsa Delivery (mgd) 6.8 72
7.5
7.9
8.3
8.7
9.9
p
2,5
2,6
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.5
3.7
4.2
¢
a
9.6
10.0
10.5
11.0
17.6
92.9
92.7
13.3
94.0
14.7
T5.15.4
1 "0.9
nnual Usage: I ;
'aerdge Day Demand (m9d) 2.3 24
2.5
2.6
2.8
2.9
3,0
3.2
3.3
3.5
ulsa Water Usage (mgd) 2.3 2.4
2.5 ?
2.6
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.7
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.9
5.6
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.9
5.6
l&M costs: i 9
ump station power [o( 95,fl00 16,764
tabor
18,693
20,553
22,588.
24,723
26,961
29,309
39,772
34,355
37,064
39,905
42,886
46,012
u•'9 bon [oj 30,030 33,527 d
37,227
4x,107
45,977
49,445
53,923
58,618
63,544
68,790
74,128
79,811
49,290
52,729
56,336
60,119
64,086
47,147
ump station repass [oj 30'Ow 33,527
37,227
41,107
45,977
49,445
53,923
58,618
63,544
68,710
74,128
79,819
85,771
92,023
98,580
105,458
112,671
120,237
928,173
94,293
urmi station macelaneous [oi 25,wo 27,939
31,022
34,256
37,647
47,205
44,936
48,849
52,953
57,256
61,773
85,771
92,023
98,580
105,458
112,671
120,237
128,173
94,293
later supply fees bTulsa '(bj 9,548.670 5,624,325.
1.703 676
9,786.904
9,874,797
9,965,755
2,061,786
2.962,506
2.2 68,950
2,378,953
2,495,969
66,509
71,476
76,686
82,150
87,881
93,893
100,198
106,890
78,578
ata10814 Cosy 9,648,670 9.736,083
9,827.766
3,923,927
87
2,930,573
2,241,528
2,357,903
2,479,963
2,607,985
2,697,063
2,744,991
2,879.005
3.099.649
3,167,164
3,321.686
3484 166
3,654,373
3,832.896
rev_nt Worth 4.648.670 1.,582,25!
9,776.173
1,750,449
L1.7785,092
1,820,192
1,855,529
1,891.333
7,927,558
9,964,210
2,742,262
2,883,099
3,030,816
3,185,748
3,348,250
3,518,690
3,697,457
3.884.956
4,089,645
4.117,X7
VLSI Present Worth of O&M Costs j 39,724,378
2,009,299
2,038,839
2,076,840
2.115.397
2,954,280
2.193.742
2,233,796
2.274,294
2,375,248
2.279.590
ores:
SD = Preliminary Study for Water Supply Development, by G- erlEngin m, as revised 2114101
P = Water Master Plan Report, by Montgomery Watson
] Costs not included in original WSD.
] Estimated costs prepared for this analysis
'eel di.s nt rate- for present worth calculations = 3,2 %, per Office of Management and Budge¢ Circular No. A -94
] Based on 50.20 per 9000 gallons of raw water (inc)udes storage fees 90 Corps of Engineers by Tulsa)
Base: on 51.9011000 gallons of water purchased from City of Tulsa
rm.
20
16
16
14
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 6 6 7 3 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20
Year
Owasso Water Supply
Analysis of water cost per 1000 gallons
Year
r.
Water Plant Alternate -
C o a ah Water u ly
jain
__0per
MMEM
MENN UWAtu,
ItIa *iii
Master Plan Alternate -
Purchase from Tulsa
Operating os
_0peratini C st
.............. ............. ........
(1) Debt Service Based on 20 Year Loan at 6% Market
Water Plant Alternate -
0o4aaakIALat
ItIa *iii
Master Plan A ternate -
1— Purchase from Tulsa
Operating os
(1) Debt Service Based on 20 Year Loan at 6% Market
City of Owasso
Comparison of Distribution System Upgrade Alternatives
rNAURM
Capital Expenditures
Initial
Year
Year 10
Year 15
| Yomr2O
Total Present Worth Cost
City of Owasso
REVISED
Comparison of Distribution System Upgrade Alternatives
8.0 mgd Water Plant Alternative
Ca ital Cost Expenditures
Costs in y
ear 0 dollars
Present Worths
Data
New WTP
Master Plan
New WTP
Master -Plan
Item
Source
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
Year 0
8 mgd pump station at Lake Oolagah & line tap
WSD
$
700,000
30" parallel raw water line (52000')
[d]
$
6,240,000
8 mgd treatment plant (expandable to 12 mgd)
[d]
$
9,000,000
30" treated water line (30,000')
WSD
$
3,600,000
Bores & miscellaneous
WSD
$
150,000
Right-of-way acquisition
WSD
$
200,000
Engineering design
WSD
$
680,000
Construction administration & inspection
WSD
$
380,000
Legal
WSD
$
70,000
Contingencies
WSD
$
770,000
Purchase site for treatment plant (40 ac)
(a)
$
200,000
Distribution system projects 1 thru 18 [b] [c]
MP
$
8,000,000
$12,801,000
Total for Year 0
$29,990,000
$12,801,000
$ 29,990,000
$12,801,000
Year 5
Distribution system projects 19 thru 21
MP
$
1,134,600
$ 1,134,600
Total for Year 5
$
1,134,600
$ 1,134,600
$ 969,269
$ 969,269
Year 10
Expand WTP from 8 mgd to 12 mgd
[d]
$
5,000,000
Expand pump station at Lake Oolagah to 12 mgd
[d]
$
300,000
Distribution system projects 22 thru 41
MP
$
6,479,000
$ 6,479,000
Total for Year 10
$11,779,000
$ 6,479,000
$ 8,596,298
$ 4,728,365
Year 15
Distribution system projects 42 thru 46
MP
$
762,600
$ 762,600
Total for Year 15
$
762,600
$ 70-,600
$ 475,446
$ 475,446
Year 20
Expand WTP from 12 mgd to 16 mgd
[d]
$
5,000,000
Expand pump station at Lake Oolagah to 12 mgd
[d]
$
-T
300,000
75TO0,000
$ 2,822,812
Total Present Worth of Capital Costs
$ 42,853,825
$189974,080
"Real discount rate" for present worth calculations = 3.2%, per Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-94
II
EWKWE
� �F3
9U
f' F'
a T_� 12
CD
ii C
O
A
2
N 'v p
cy; m
C� cmi Iq q
�2
q� ® c? cli 115 In
1.
So
N d .6
Rl 1 A
g
Ili
M li 6
Iq
cq.
4�N
--- � �
ql
1.
11 cq -q
c7f P,: . . .
12 1 I
N
.6 I 6
(6 N m ob
cz
... .o
1 6
FI-I 2--�
Lfj
4,......
1616
T
EWKWE
� �F3
9U
f' F'
a T_� 12
CD
ii C
O
N 'v p
cy; m
C� cmi Iq q
I
q� ® c? cli 115 In
1.
So
4�N
--- � �
ql
1.
11 cq -q
12 1 I
N
EWKWE
� �F3
9U
f' F'
a T_� 12
CD
ii C
O
x
20
18
16
14
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Year
207 South Ce'
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 7401
Is,II � �i
Charles
Public Works Director
City of
200 Civic Center
. 74103
� City
Owasso
'I 111i I �16111 19211 16 111[1`5 i �_' r
This letter is a follow up to our meeting of April 269 2001 in your office.
As you know the City of Owasso is planning major improvements to our water system to meet our
growing water demands. Alternatives for meeting these demands include enlarging our system to obtain
additional treated water from the City of Tulsa or developing our own water supply f-om Lake Oolagah.
Both alternatives will rewire the creation of an "upper level's distribution system in north Owasso, which
is higher in elevation.
°1 he alternative for obtaining raw water from Oolagah could best be accomplished tbrough a connection to
the City of Tulsa raw water line immediately below the Oolagah Dare. Our projections indicate we would
need 4 to 8 MGD initially with a 20-year pear day of 1.2 M D.
This letter is to formally request approval from the City of Tulsa for the City of Owasso to connect to the
Oolagah raw water line. In addition, to aid us in our options analysis, we would life to receive a .cost
estimate (per 1000 gallons) for raw water to be purchased.
We are available to meet with your staff' an for the Tulsa, Metropolitaii, Utility Authority as needed.
We greatly appreciate your assistance on this matter.
M. F. Robert Carr (Owasso Public Works Director)
Jay Updike (Holloway, Updike & Bellen, Inc.) C(DPY
AWREAS, CMA is the holder of water rights by virtue of grant of the Oklahoma Water
Resources Board io and to the Oologah Reservoir located in Rogers County, Oklahoma, such
water rights presently in excess of those needed for the customers of CMA;
OPWA is need of alternative water to serve its present as well as future
customers; and
WHEREAS, CMA and a ¢these
not Million 4 0 0ti
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual covenants hereinafter
contained, the pwies agree as follows, to td
Section One
Vt —i0—z t& C e-
by these presents, for mid in considerati ®n of the payment ®f One T io and
($1,000.00) Dollars from the OPW , upon execution hem of, F d One Thousand ($1,000.00)
Dollus a year thereafter due on the atwiversary date hereof, does grant ruxto OPWA the fight to
purchase raw water from CMA in an amount not to exceed Four Million (4,000,040) Gallons per
ayo
OPWA sball exercise its option to purchase by giving not less than thirty (30) days written
notice to CMA of its intent to exercise its option to purchase such raw water in the amount not to
exceed Four Million (4,000,000) Gallons per day. Thereafter the parties shall forthwith, in good
faith, negotiate and maive at a mutually acceptable water supply contract.
Section Three
This option to purchase raw water in the aniount not to exceed Four Million (4,000,000)
gallons per day shall be in effective ftom, the Ist day of July, 2001 until the 30' day of June, 2006.
Section of
Entire mmingiAw
— ftr-�—emenLa&d —Goye
The foregoing represents the entire Agreement betwecu the parties. No amendments or
modificatiQns, hereto shall be effective unless reduced to writing and executed by both parties.
The laws of the State of Oklahoma shall govern the interpretation, construction and enforceanent
0
Section Five
Aj
The foregoing Option Agreement shall be binding upon the assigns and successors in
mterest of the p-wties hereto, The duties and rights herein provided for shall not be assignable by
646"
g a 'g�
o j , _v�
-nL-#.f the either- such consent not to be mweasonably
NNI'm
Fern Young, Authority Smwetary
Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
3760-149agrowasso.wpd
Michael Sirmon, Chaiman
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
Mary Lott Ban-dsouse, Chairperson
I
207 South Cedar
PO Box 'i 80
Owasso,, OK 740fl-l"
. City of Owasso
IRS A 65`131' 51"', 111 '11WRE
ATTENTION:
NUMBER OF PAGES (including this Cover a® __5a —
REFERENCE:
FAX # THESE DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SENT TO. a58,'2
COMMENTS:
NOTICE: The documents accompanying this FAX transmission are inte�ded only for the use of
the individual or entity named above. if you have received this transmittal in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone.
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR & TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC GOLF AUTHORITY
FROM: RUSSELL CARLSON
DIRECTOR OF GOLF
SUBJECT.- REQUEST FOR ADOPTIO 4O 4. OPGA
RESOULUTION #2001-03, INCREASING THE
GREEN FEES SCHEDULE
DATE:
June 1, 2001
Bailey Ranch has not instituted a price increase for Residents/Patron Cardholders since
the city took over operations ha 1996, With the drastic jwnp in energy costs coupled with
the increase in employee benefits, it now becomes imperative to raise golf rates one
dollar for Residents/Patron Cardholders and three dollars for regular weekend green fees,
Institute price increases as follows:
OPGA RESOULUTIOTTYI—CM-U
YUNE 1, 2001
PACTE2
mmillist-
Aug JI
JIMI]IIIi AMTHAURNMIX.10,
Im
MRATEM T
� = R
E
Forest le
$4.00/$8.00
�. �.. Battle Creek
111
`_ ` , , ,
rt� $53. .._
Whitehawk
Clap( Fields/NEW
s
i
.00/$6.0
` ^�
.
i
LaFortu ne/South lakes
$3.00/$6.00
I
Heritage Hills
Sand S injs
$27.50
$2.00/$4.00
BAILEY ' A � ! i
-' BAILEY RANCH PROPOSED
$3.001$6.00
IViV
y �i
001$6. '
Mr. James Greene, Chief of Policd-
City of Owasso
207 S. Cedar
Owasso, OK 74055
E��=
pmm
3
LU
LU
up
go
1
X
n' J
�Jf
St
f ;S'
o
apuc®ww PUUUT5 UT I v resIg
Register for Basic Beekeeping classes
* Next monthly e o';
* Fall Basic Beekeeping
- .. �� �� �a� x �Ra� a a, la aeuu L1CUZ� ClIecr )V to
of everything you eat somehow,
Mary fruits and vegetables would produce only about 5% of
their crop without the service ®f the pollinators—honeybees.
Beekeeping Legal in Tulsa
best interest.
Of course, like every
thing else there are some
restrictions but they
only for the beekcepe_
I f taken care
of properly they pre -
sent NO real problem
public, to your w
4 `
�r
Animals
every rabies suspected animal, and every animal, the keeping or harboring of which is declared to be an
offense. (Prior Code, Sec. 3 -28; Ord. No. 532, 12/3/96)
SECTION 49118 WILD AND EXOTIC ANIMALS PROHIBITION ON KEEPING
LreptA. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep, harbor, maintain or have in his /her possession or
ile er his /her control within the City (except reptiles which are defined in Section D), any poisonous
or other wild animal, insect, or other exotic animal not generally recognized to be domesticated or
ich, because of size, vicious nature or any other characteristic, presents a danger to human beings, and
ll include but not limited toe
1. The following member of the Class Mammalia:
(a). Order Carnivora,
Family Felidae m cougars, lions, panthers, tigers, jaguars, leopards, ocelots, and
margays except commonly accepted domesticated cats,
Family Ursidae % bears;
Family Canidae - wolves, coyotes, jackals, Bingos, foxes, and the African wild
dog, to include any canine hybrid mix, to include but not limited to wolf, coyote or
dingo mix hybrid;
Family Mustelidae - weasels, martins, minks, badgers, and skunks;
Family Procyonodae x raccoon;
(b). Order Chiroptera w bats
(c). Order Edentata m sloths, anteaters and armadillos;
(d). Order marsupialia 5 kangaroos and common opossums;
(e). Order Proboscidea - elephants;
(f), Order Primata @ monkeys, chimpanzees and gorillas;
(g). Order Rodentia o beaver, muskrat and porcupines;
(h). Order Ungulata - antelope, deer, bison, camels;
2, The following members of the Class Aves:
(a). Order Falconiforms - hawks, eagles, falcons and vultures which are not kept
pursuant to federal or state permits;
(b). Subdivision Ratitae - ostriches, rheas, cassowaries and emus;
3. Any species of animal which is venomous to human beings whether its venom is
transmitted by bite, sting, touch or other means - to include the keeping of bees whether for commercial
purpose or hobby;
4. Any species of animal when kept, maintained or harbored in such numbers of in such
manner as to constitute the likelihood of danger to the animals themselves, to human beings or to the
properly of human beings.
B, The provisions of section A shall not apply to menageries, zoological gardens, exotic animal
shows or sales, and circuses, rf.
Their location conforms to the provisions of the zoning ordinance of the City.
2. All animals and animal quarters are kept in a clean and sanitary conditions and so
maintained as to eliminate objectionable odors;
3. Animals are maintained in quarters so constructed as to prevent their escape; and, i
and in the event of escape, the owner or custodian of such animal immediately notifies the animal control
officer.
Page 4 -13
Animals
2. The Alligators, Caimans and Crocodiles - Order Crochodylia.
3. The Lizards - Order Squamata; suborder Ophidia-
Family Elapidae - Cobras;
Family Hydrophiidae --sea snakes;
Family Viperidae - vipers;
Family Crotalidae - pit vipers;
Family Colubridae, sub family Disadomorphinae, rear fang snakes and the specific
species: Dispholidus typus, the Boomslang; Thelotornis Kirklandi, African bird eating snake;
Boiga dendrophilia, the Mangrove snake.
E. Habitat
Recognizing that reptiles differ from other animals in handling techniques, the sections listed below
must be followed to allow anyone to possess and /or house reptiles in the city.
1. All reptiles held as pets or specimens in the city of Owasso must be contained within
secure habitats capable of preventing escape.
F. Transport and Handling
Reptiles being transported in Owasso will be secured within escape proof containers.
2. Acceptable reptiles may be handled openly if the handler is demonstrating the reptile
for sale within a retail business establishment approved for sale of such reptiles.
3. Reptiles shall not be handled openly in public places, e.g. parks, schools, shopping
areas, etc.
4. Prior approval and notification of the animal control officer must be made before
conducting any educational programs utilizing reptiles within the Owasso City Limits.
G. Release of Reptiles
1. Reptiles not indigenous to the state of Oklahoma, shall not be released or abandoned by
their owners and /or their handlers in the city of Owasso.
2. Any species of reptile not indigenous to the state of Oklahoma which may be secured.
by, or forfeited to, Animal Control shall be turned over to a zoo or a reptile rescue organization for proper
disposition, or if necessary may be destroyed if deemed proper by Animal Control.
3. Species indigenous to the state of Oklahoma which are secured by Animal Control rxray
be released to the wild as Animal Control deems proper.
Ha Bee Hives Prohibited
L Bee hives or the keeping of bees is prohibited within the Owasso City Limits.
I. Penalties
Unless otherwise provided, every person violating any of the provisions of this title shall be guilty
of an offense and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $200.00 and /or ten (10) days
in jail. (Ord. No. 532, 12/3/96)
Page 4 -15