Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000.04.11_Planning Commission MinutesOWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, April 11, 2000 Owasso Community Center 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Ray Haynes Larry Felton Bob Randolph Bill Ellison Charles Willey MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRE, SENT Tim Mooney Marsha Hensley The agenda for the regular meeting was posted in the Owasso City Mall, 207 S Cedar, on April 7, 2000 at 11000 AM, 1. CALL TO ORDER -- Chairperson Ray Haynes called the meeting to order at Ia00 PM and declared a quorum present. 2. ROLL, CALL 1 CONSIDER APPROVAL, OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 14, 2000 REGULAR MEETING. Bob Randolph moved to approve the minutes on the March 14, 2000 meeting. Bill Ellison seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows; Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Pill Ellison ® Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 4. OZ -00 -02 Joe Wolfe - A request for the rezoning of property described as the N/2, NW /4, SW /4 of Section 28, T -21 -N, R -14 -E. The subject property is 20 acres, more or less, and is located northeast of the Graceland Acres Addition. Proposed is a rezoning from AG (Agriculture) to RS -3 (Residential Single - Family High - Density). Tim Rooney presented the item and described the location of the property. He stated that a large drainage channel does run through a portion of the property, which would require regrading prior to any development. This property was annexed in March of this year. A portion of the Elm Creek Interceptor runs across the property and would serve the development. Notices were mailed to surrounding property owners and a legal advertisement was published in the Owasso Reporter on March 23, 2000. Staff has O A SO PLANNING COMMISSION April 119 2000 Page No. 2 received one call wanting to Imow why the lot lira Wolfe owns in Craceland Acres was not included in the request. Mr. Wolfe was present to answer any questions. The following are comments that were made by surrounding property owners. Mark Graham -- Considers Craceland .Acres to be a small conflnunity type development. Does not want the traffic and is not in support of the rezoning, He also had questions regarding the easement for access into the addition. Robert Thomas -- Concerns regarding the street in which the traffic will be using, Jim Phillips -- Questioned as to whether the property is annexed into the City. Maxine Thomas - Drainage concerns in the area, foes not life the idea of access into the subject property going through the lot Mr, Wolfe owns in Craceland acres. Bob Bates -. Concerned with the water run off` in the area. Ray Haynes m Yes Bob Randolph ® Yes Bill Ellison ® Yes Tarry Helton _ Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 5m Z -00 ®03 -- David Charne - A request for the rezoning of property located within the SE /4 of Section 9, T -21 -N, R -14 -E. The subject property is located east of US Highway O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 3 169 and north of E. 106`h Street North and contains 30 acres more or less. Proposed is a rezoning from AG (Agriculture) to O (Office Medium). `I'irn Rooney presented the item and described the location of the property. This request is a parcel of land approximately 30 acres in area requesting an Did district in order to allow for the development of the proposed Tulsa Technology Center. OM zoning permits Cultural and Recreational facilities. Mater to the property would be provided by Washington County Rural Water District, sanitary sewer service would run into the Elm Greer Interceptor. A decision will be made prior to construction regarding the details of how the sewer line will be constructed and how it will be paid for. Notices were mailed to surrounding property owners and the legal advertisement was published in the Owasso Reporter. Two calls were received both were pleased with the proposed development. Mr. David Charney, the applicant, made a brief presentation. He explained that Opal Robinson donated this land. He spore of the planned major accesses being 14.5 " East Avenue, 106" Street North and U.S. 169 service road. The proposed technology center will foes on computers and high tech uses for computer science. The following are co _ ° ents made from several surrounding property owners: John Stier - -- Questions as to whether items #6, #7 and #g are ivied together. Lich Tlalbrook - Concerns regarding that the City does not send notices to property owners for the platting process. Is there some way we can produce an ordinance that would require notification on the platting process? Linda Pennekamp -- Expressed concerns regarding not having a voice in the community because of her residence being in Rogers County. Stated that transporting the school children two miles to a technology center would be much better than taking them into "Tulsa. Traffic issues on 145th E Avenue and 106`h Street North were discussed. 'Tim explained that the Planning Commissioners do not address street problems. The Capital Improvement Committee would solve these issues. Ray Haynes moved to approve the rezoning request subject to each resident, which desires to be notified of the platting process, receive notification by the City of Owasso. Bill Alison seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes O A SO PLANNING COMMISSION April 119 2000 Page No. 4 Larry Melton --- files Charles Willey -- Yes The motion carried 5.0. q -00-04 - Pittman, Poe & Associates - A request for the rezoning of property located within the E/2 of Section 16, T-21 -N, R- -14 -E. The subject property is located east of 1)S Highway 169 and south of E. 106`' Street North and contains 157.5 acres, more or less. Proposed is a rezoning from AG (Agriculture) to RS-3 (Residential ,Single - Family High Density), R H (Residential 'T'ownhouse), R -2 (residential Single - Family High Density), Oil (Office Medium), CS (Commercial Shopping Center) and CG (Commercial General). The purpose of the rezoning is to provide underlying coning necessary for OPIlD -1g. Tim Rooney presented the item to the Commissioners. He explained that OZ- -00 -04 rezoning and OPUD -18 would be discussed at the same time, but requires separate votes. Mr. Tim Terrell with Pittman -Poe was introduced and made a brief presentation. Mr. Terrell presented a color -coded PUD map and he explained the different uses that are included in the P11D request, Mr. David Charney asked the Commissioners and surrounding property owners if they had any questions, The following is a list of cornments and concerns Don Sider .- More apartments are not needed in Owasso. Noble Sokolosky - 1-lad property with bad drainage problems, these problems were corrected after development, the water run off was much better. Has done work with Pittman -Poe and feels they will do a great job on this project. Linda Pennekamp -- Questioned the platting process, can you go down or up in density? Possibly change the density to RS -2 just along the south portion. Mike Hacker -- Had concerns regarding the opening of 139"' East Avenue. Also wants consideration of what the residents to the north are going to see behind them, which is houses that are 10' apart. Consider making larger lots to the very southern portion of this development. Beverly Dunaway --- She feels that the City of Owasso will not let the streets deteriorate with the technology center coming. Might need apartments at this location to help accommodate the technology center students. O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 5 Donna Priore - Questioned whether there has been an environmental study of the area. 'There is an abundance of wildlife. Requested to delete the multi-- farmly housing and commercial and approve only the single family. T here was discussion regarding water run off problems and discussion on the possibility of environmental studies being performed. Mr. Charney explained that the lots along the south portion would be approximately 0' wide, which is lamer than required for are RS -. 3. also, sewer concerns for the area was addressed, Tim Rooney made a brief presentation. He described the concept of a PUD and he stated there is 10% flexibility on a PUD. The Owasso 2010 Master Plan shows this as a mixed -use development and appropriate for this Wyse. Buffer requirements include a 6-foot "privacy" fence to separate commercial development that abuts residential. Notification was seat to surrounding property owners and legal advertisement appeared in the Owasso reporter, The property was pasted on March 23, 2000. Mr. Rooney stated that staff recommends approval of OZ- 00 - -04 and, recommends approval of OPUD -18 subject to the following conditions OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 6 8, All covenants of any subdivision plat containing property within the PUD shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and. make the City of Owasso beneficiary. 9. That a detailed drainage report be submitted at the time of platting, and certification of such document be an engineer. 10, Acceleration/Deceleration lanes will be required on E. 106`h ;street North and N. 1.45"' E. Avenue. 11. Sidewalks will be required aloe E. 106"' Street North and N. 145 "' E Avenue, as well as along office and commercial areas within the development. 1.2. No flag lots are permitted within any portion of the PUD 11 if needed, commercial area may be required to provide on -site detention. This to be determined at site plan review -for commercial property. 14. Detailed landscaping plans (type, species, size, location and irrigation) shall be required to be submitted with site plans of any commercial development. Said plans will be reviewed by staff and. must be approved by the planning Commission. 15. That within the commercial areas of development, no free-standing pole sign shall be greater than 30' in height and that monument signs will be strongly encouraged. 16. forth 139"' East Avenue will not be opened for access. Charles Willey stated that he felt the commercial areas will be a benefit to the city and knowing the developers, this project will be done in good taste. He also stated to insure a view of undeveloped land, you need to buy the property. Tim looney suggested that anybody that would like to have site plan review notice sent to there, to mark the sign -in sheet and he will send them a notice prior to the planning Commission meeting. Ray Haynes moved to approve the rezoning subject to the above conditions of the PUD being met, the southernmost 120' boundary of the PUD to be RS-2 zoning district and with the addition of the above item #16 stating no access will be made off of 139 " East Avenue. Bill Ellison seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: WASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 7 Ray Haynes -- `des Bob Randolph -- `des Bill Ellison -- Yes Larry Felton -- files Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried `i -0. 7m m18 -- Pittman, Poeµ & Associates m A request for review of a Planned Unit Development with the E/2 of Section 16, T -21 -119 R- -14-E. The subject property is located east of US Highway 169 and south of E. 106`x' Street North and contains 157.5 acres, more or less. Proposed is a PUD designation to allow for a mixed use residential, office, and commercial development, Action on this item is contingent upon favorable review of Agenda Item #6. This item was discussed along with item #6. Ray Haynes moved to approve OPUD -18 subject to staff recommendations, Charles Willey seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Alison -- Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey -- Yes The motion carried 5 -0. Chairperson Ray Haynes requested a 10- minute break. ® Preliminary Plat - Woodridge Estates -- A request for review of a preliminary plat for Woodridge Estates, a 94 lot, 41.69 acre subdivision described as a portion of the E/2 of Section 16, T -21 -N9 R -14 -E. The subject property is located east of US Highway 169 and south of E 106'h Street N. Tim described the location of the property. He stated the Woodridge Estates are comprised of 94 lots on 41.69 acres. It is a portion of the single -- family tract of the previously reviewed PUD. The park areas shown on the plat act as buffers between the single family and the office, commercial and multi - family areas of the PUD. Drainage of the area was discussed briefly. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the plat at WASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 8 their March 29, 2000 meeting. 'There were few comments made at that meeting and the corrections have been included on the plat. Ray Haynes moved to approve the preliminary plat subject to the requirements fro 'i staff and TAC being met, Bob Randolph seconded the motion. The vote on the _ mention was as follows: Ray Haynes ... Yes Bob Randolph Yes Bill Alison -- Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey -- Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 90 OLS-00 -01 �_ Boos Builders - A request for review of a lot split of the east 40 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Flock 1, Central Dark II Addition. Tim presented the item to the Commissioners. This lot split would create four "new " properties that would be conveyed to the Central Dark Homeowners Association. This item can be viewed as a house keeping matter. The approval of this lot split would result in the "legal" separation of the East 40 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Block 1. TAC reviewed this item on March 29, 2000 and there were no objections. Ray Haynes moved to approve the lot split, Bill Ellison seconded. The vote on the motion was as follows; Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison -- Yes Larry Helton -- Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. loo Final Plat - Camden Park 11 --- A request to review the final plat for Camden Park II, a 42 lot, 13.86 acre subdivision. Camden Park II is located immediately south of Windsor Lake 11 and north of the Barrington Point Additions. WASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 9 Tien presented the item to the Commissioners. He stated that Camden Dark II has been reviewed several times beginning as early as 1994. The 'Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the final plat on March 29, 2000. No additional comments were provided except for the several address changes, which are included on the plat. Bob Randolph moved to approve the Final Flat. Larry Helton seconded the motion, The vote on the motion was as follows Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Dill Ellison - Yes Harry Helton -- Yes Charles Willey - Yes 'rho motion carried 5 - -0. 11, E g i��ar�_ Plat - Owasso Market 11 . -- A request to review the preliminary plat for Owasso Market 11, a resubdivision of Lots 3, 4, 5, and % of Block 1 of Owasso Market. The subject property contains 5 lots on 25.76 acres, more or less. Owasso Market II is located on E. 96' Street North, west of US Highway 169, Ray Haynes moved to approve the preliminary plat for Owasso Market II subject to staff recommendations, Charles Willey seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows; Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph m Yes Bill Ellison - Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. AS CU PLANNING COMMISSION April 11, 2000 Page No. 10 12. efindnaryu lat._...=: Bradford,Parr _.. A request to review the preliminary Plat for Bradford Parr, a one lot, one block 18.66 acre subdivision located south of E. 76th Street North and west of N. 129Th E /venue. Tim presented the item to the Commissioners. 110 explained that Bradford Park was a Part of OPUD -17 and this Portion calls for single- family attached dwellings with Private streets and Parr and detention areas, The 'Technical Advisory Committee reviewed this Plat at their March 29, 2000. 'There were a large amount of questions so staff scheduled an additional meeting on April 5, 2000 to address these concerns, 'Those concerns have been addressed and are included on this plat, The applicants were present to answer any concerns or questions that the Commissioners might have. Water run off was discussed. The applicant stated that there will be three ponds to hold run off water. Ray flay-ties moved to approve the Preliminary flat for Bradford Parr subject to TAC and staff requirements, Bill Ellison seconded. The vote on the motion was as follows. Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Alison - Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey -- Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 13 Reports on monthly building permit activity 14 Report on planning items previously forwarded to City Council. 15 Discussion of development in and near Owasso. 16. ADJOURNMENT -- Bill Ellison moved, Larry Helton seconded, to adjourn the meeting. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows; Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison -- Yes Larry Helton - Yes Charles Willey - Yes OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION April 119 2000 Page No. 11 Date