Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003.02.10_Planning Commission MinutesO ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Monday, February 109 2003 Owasso Community Center 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Ray Haynes Charles Willey Dale Prevett Dewey Brown Bill Williams MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Rodney Ray Robert Moore Rickey Mayes Eris; Wiles Marsha Hensley The agenda for the regular meeting was posted at the north entrance to City Fall on February 5, 2003 at 12;00 PM. 1, CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson Ray Haynes called the meeting to order at 7;00 PM and declared a quorum present. 1 ROLL CALL 3, CONSIDER APPROVAL, OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 13, 2003 REGULAR MEETING -- The Commission reviewed the minutes of January 13, 2003 Regular Meeting, Charles Willey moved, seconded by Dewey Brown to approve the minutes. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows; Ray Haynes - -- Yes Charles Willey - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Dale Prevett -- Yes Bill Williams - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 4. Request to Address the Planning Commission - A request to address the Planning Commission by Mr. Rodney Ray, City Manager. Chairperson Haynes suggested that the above request be moved to the last item on the agenda. 5. OILS-03-01 - A request for a lot split of Lots 4 and 5, Block 7, Preston Lakes II Addition. The subject properties are generally located 250 feet east of the E. 89 "' Pl. N. and N. 153'" E. Ave. intersection. The Chair introduced the case and Robert presented the item. The applicant is requesting the review of this application to correct the placement of a single family structure on Lot WASSO PLANNING COMMISSION February 10, 2003 Page No. 2 5, Bloch %. If approved it would remove 6' from the eastern portion of Lot 4 adding the width to the western boundary of Hot 5. Robert explained that the mistake was the result of locating the foundation according to the property pins to the south. Apparently, the property pins along E. 89"' Place North were removed. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the request at their January 29, 2003 meeting. No comments were provided. Concerns were addressed regarding the mininsum lot area requirement, Robert explained that if approved, Lot 4 would meet the minimum area requirement but not the 65' minimum lot frontage requirement. Staff recommends conditional approval of 01_,S_. 03 -01 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant applies for and receives variance approval from the minimum lot frontage requirements in the RS -3 zoning district by the City of Owasso Board of Adjustment on Lot 4, Bloch 7, Preston Lakes II Addition. 2. The applicant provides an official copy of the recorded deed(s) to the City prior to final inspections on Lot 5 and prior to the issuance of building permits on Lot 4. The applicant, Stuart Gallagher, was present and requested a brief presentation. fir. Gallagher distributed copies of the plat which showed the two lots involved, along with several example plot plans of houses that could fit on Lot 4. He stated that he had purchased Lot 4 in order to straighten out the problem of Lot 5. Ray Haynes expressed appreciation towards Mr. Gallagher for being present but, hopes that he has learned to be more cautious in the future. Ray Haynes moved to approve OLS -03 -01 subject to the above staff recommended conditions, Dale Prevett seconded the motion. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Dale Prevett - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Bill Williams - Yes The motion carried 5-0. 6. OZ- 03-01® A request to rezone approximately 5.01 acres, more or less from AG (Agricultural General District) to IL (Industrial Light District). The subject property is located on the north side of W. 2"' St. approximately 1600 feet west of W. 2"' St. and Main St. intersection. The Chair introduced the case and staff review was given by Robert. The surrounding land use was described along with the surrounding zoning. Robert explained that an industrial zoning classification would sewn to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION February 10, 2003 Page No. 3 Plan which shows a future land use of park and recreational. Staff feels that by the original approval of the construction of the Sertoma building, a change in the development pattern of the area has been created. Staff would be in favor of a CG (Commercial General District) zoning designation rather than an 11., (Industrial Light District). Letters were mailed to surround property owners and legal advertisement: was published. No phone calls have been received regarding the zoning request. The Technical Advisory Corrrrnittee reviewed the rezoning at the January 29, 2003 meeting. Staff` or utility providers had no comments, Staff recommends approval of OZ-- 03 - -01, rezoning approximately 5.01 acres, from AG (Agricultural General District) to CG (Commercial General District). Charles 'Willey reminded the Commissioners that only one acre at the southernrrrost point was annexed into the City of Owasso. Ray Haynes moved to table the item, Charles Willey seconded the motion, A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Dale Prevett -- Yes Dewey Brown -- Yes Bill Williams -- Yes The motion carried 5 - -0. i. Final Plat - Watercolours at Coffee Creep _. A request for the review of a final plat for the Watercolours at Coffee Creek containing approximately 5.96 acres, more or less. The 'Watercolours at Coffee Creek Final Plat contains 40 townhouse lots within 5 blocks. The subject property is located northeast of the E. 103'd St. N. and N. 138" E. Ave. intersection. The Chair introduced the item and Robert reviewed the staff report. The subject property is zoned PUD /RTH (Planned Unit Development /Residential 'townhouse District). The preliminary plat was approved on April 9, 2002. Conditions of approval from the preliminary approval not addressed by the final plat are below: 1. Perimeter sidewalks must be shown on the final plat prior to bring the item to City Council. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the final plat at their January 29, 2003 meeting. Below are the comments made by utility providers and staff. Staff recommends approval of the Watercolours at Coffee Creek, subject to the following conditions: 1. Community Development -- The property is subject to a $16.00 per acre siren fee ($16.00 X 5.96 acres = $95.36). The fee must be paid prior to releasing the final plat for signatures. 2. Community Development - The property is subject to a $1580.00 per acre fee for OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION February 10, 2003 Page No. 4 connecting to the Elm Creek sewer facilities ($1580.00 X 5.96 acres = $9416.68). The acreage fee for this plat is equal to the dollar amount of ROW donated for the construction of the Owasso Land Trust sewer line to the north. 3. Community Development - -- the property is subject to a $1000.00 per acre fee for connecting to the Owasso Land Trust sewer facilities ($1000.00 x 5.96 acres $5960.00). 4, Community Development Addressing must be shown on the final plat prior to bring the item to City Council. 5, Community Development - Copies of DEQ permits are required prior to bringing the item to City Council, 6. Community Development -- N. 135 "' E. Ave. should be changed to N. 138 "' E. Ave. 7. Community Development - Perimeter sidewalks rest be shown on the final plat prior to bringing the item to City Council. & Community Development -Flo on -- street parking is allowed and mast be correctly signed within the development. 9. Community Development - Covenants are numbered incorrectly, please correct. 10. Community Development Covenants #5 should state that the City, Rural eater District and anv interested_utilitv I L Public Works -- Reserve areas and detention easements must be shown on the Wirral Plat prior to bringing the item to City Council. 12. ONG - -- Requests that the standard easement language related to residential gas service be added to the final plat prior to bringing the item to City Council. Ray Haynes - Yes Charles Willey -- Yes Dale Prevett - Yes Dewey Brown -- Yes Pill Williams - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSI ®N February 10, 7003 Page No. 5 Mr, Ray addressed the Commissioners regarding the history of non - contiguous annexations. He stated that the annexation Policy has served the City of Owasso extremely well for the past twenty - -seven years. The legality of non-contiguous annexation petitions was also discussed, Mr. Ray suggested. the Commissioners revisit the Schumacher annexation request, bearing in mind that the 70 acre tract is bordered by at least 60 acres of undeveloped property with potential for growth. Chairperson Haynes stated that the Commissioners will consider what Mr. Ray has brought before them. 8. Report on monthly building permit activity. 9. Deport on planning items previously forwarded to City Council. 10. Discussion of development in and near Owasso. 11. Adjournment - -- Charles Willey :moved, Dale; Prevett seconded, to adjourn the meeting. A vote on the notion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - des Charles Willey -- Yes Dale Pr evett m Yes Dewey Brown _. Yes Bill Williams _w Yes The motion carried 5 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 PIS. ........ . , e l / p ..t Dae Historical Perspective ®n Non-Contiguous u®us Annexation Ordinance # 195 - -197 237 303 305 633 658 672 703 718 729 Date 9/24/76 9/19/78 12/15/81 7/7/81 3/3/00 10/3/00 4/17/01 3/19/02 11/5/02 12/17/0 Name Wal-Mart Property / Hale Acre El Rio Mists Hillside Estates Westport Coffee Creek / -` o-Tech QuiekTrip / Eggberts' Br ookefield Crossing Garrett reel Sokoloslcy Morningwoo l ��n�� ' "�«�� m� Owasso CommuoityDovdopnncotDepartment lll North Main P.O. Box 100 Owasso, Oklahoma 74055 Phone: (0l8)376-|543 Fax: (Vl8)376-l59? ANNEXATION POLICY The following annexation policy for the City of Owasso is provided asaguideline and should not be construed as inflexible requirements for annexation. 1� While there is no minimum tract size, properties of larger than 20 aonaa are preferable. 2� All proper-ties should be contiguous to existing City limits. 3. All properties should be annexed into the City limits osthe lowest zoning classification, that is, Agricultural (AG). Landowners may then petition for rezoning if they desire further development of their property. All legal uses annexed into the Qty will be legal, but non-conforming, which means that they may continue but cannot be expanded without proper zoning. 4� All public infrastructures that do not meet City standards will not be improved by the City until brought to the City standard and accepted by the City Council. Such public facilities must be improved at owners expense by the establishment of a special assessment district ur some other financing method. 5. Where oCity limit boundary ends mta dedicated street, the boundary will not include the street right-of-way. This policy will establish consistence slid allow City employees and citizens to know where the City boundaries are. 8 Properties that are rejected for annexation should not be considered for annexation fora six month period after rejection by the City Council. Adopted by City Council on March 1. 1988.