The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002.03.12_Planning Commission MinutesOWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 12, 2002 Owasso Community Center 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Ray Haynes Charles Willey Bill Ellison Bill Williams Dewey Brown MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF F P + SENT Donna Sorrells Marsha Hensley Stan Ewing The agenda for the regular meeting was posted at the north entrance to City Hall at 5000 PM on the 7 "' day of Larch 2002. 1, CALL TO ORDER -- Chairperson ray Haynes called the meeting to order at 7;00 PM and declared a quorum present. 1 ROLL CALF 3, CONSIDER_ APPROVAL, OF THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 12, 2002 REGULAR MEETING - The Commission reviewed the minutes of February 12, 2002 regular Meeting, Charles Willey moved, seconded by Dewey brown to approve the minutes. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows; Ray Haynes -- Yes Bill Alison -- Yes Charles Willey - Yes Pill Williams -W Yes Dewey Brown -- Yes The motion carried 5-0. Donna presented the item and described the property location. She explained the concept of a Planned Unit Development and discussed the history of the subject property. According to the Owasso Zoning Code, the 3.78 acre CS (Commercial Shopping) portion of the subject property could accommodate as much as 82,493 square feet of commercial building area. The applicant proposes preserving the southern 30% of the site as natural open space to preserve the existing flood plain. Notification letters were mailed to surrounding property owners on February 19, 2002 and legal notification was published in the Owasso reporter. The Owasso 'Technical Advisory Committee reviewed this request and all comments have been addressed. Mr. Joe Caudle was present, along with O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 2002 Page fro. 2 Mr. Brooks Pittman from Pittman -Toe to answer any questions. Mr. Brooks Pittman requested to be recognized by the Come- nissioners. He explained the concept of the buffer easement; he also discussed the southern flood plain area. `fhe following are comments road €; lforn several surrounding property owners present: Eddy Roberts (11005 E 95 PI Flo) .- Presented the Commissioners with a signed petition frorn residents of Caudle Estates (attached). He would like to see a larger buffer area and an 4' privacy fence. Expressed concerns with vehicle headlights shining into the homes. Edward Kehoe (9500 N 109 E Ave) -- Concerns regarding the service road on the west side of the building, the noise from service trucks, trash trucks, etc. He would like to see a wider buffer area, possibly 150 feet. Gloria Wall (9507 N 111 E Ave) -- Concerns with the odor from trash dumpsters if a restaurant was to be in the proposed development, Paul Christian (10902 E 95 PI loo) -- Would prefer the coordinated plan of a PUD with corrimercial property, than that of low income housing or apartments. Likes the lay out of the shown conceptual plan. Sandy Harrell (10302 S Quebec Pl) --- Owns property south of proposed PUD. Has no objections, would like to be notified prior to plat review. Donna explained the process and the time span involved in a Planned unit Development request. She also suggested that trash pick up be limited to certain times of the day with the dumpsters located at the south end of the building. Staff recommends approval of OPUD -02 -01 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant's Outline Development Plan and Text shall be filed of record in the office of the Tulsa County Clerk and two recorded copies provided to the City Planner prior- to the processing of any plat associated with the PUD. 2. Sidewalks along the perimeter of the development shall be installed at the time of development. All other sidewalks shall be installed at the time of site construction. 3. Acceleration /deceleration lanes shall be required at all access points along arterial roads. 4. A detailed drainage report shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works department prior to the processing of any plat associated with the PUD. 5. Detailed covenants and restrictions incorporating all conditions of the PUD and governing the unified design and function of the PUD shall be required at the time of platting. O ASSO PLANNING NG COMMISSION March 12, 2002 Page No. 3 6. Unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, commercial development shall meet all requirements of the CS (Commercial Shopping) district. 7. Within the PUD, the maximum building floor area shall not exceed 82,493 square feet. & All conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval shall be met as conditions of the PUD. 9. All covenants of any subdivision plat containing property within the PUD shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary. 10. No building permit shall be issued within any portion of the PUD until all criteria outlined within Chapter 8 of the Owasso Subdivision regulations are met by the developer. 11, Detailed landscape plans for individual site shall be submitted at the time of site plan review. 11 area markers, including associated landscaping and lighting, shall be submitted to and approved by the Owasso Planning Commission as required by the Sign Ordinance. 11 The planning Commission reserves the right to prescribe additional buffering, screening and setbacks during the platting process. Ray Haynes moved to approve OPUD- 02 -01, subject to the above staff recommendations. Also, subject to the following additional requirements: 14. Limit trash pick up and deliveries to daytime working hours only (8:00 AM to 5:00 PM). 15. Direct parking lot lighting to the subject property only. 16. Trash enclosures provided for dumpsters. 17. The size of trees, used for the buffer area, is to be 8' to 10' tall or larger, fast growing species. 1S. The proposed facility is to be a one level building which backs up to Caudle Estates. 19. Deep drainage controlled. 20. A minimum of a 50' setback from the property line to the back of the building. That would require a 20' buffer and a 30' easement. Charles Willey seconded the motion. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes m Yes Bill Ellison d Yes Charles Willey - Yes Pill Williams - Yes Dewey Brown -- Yes O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION Match 12, 2002 Page Nom 4 The motion carried 5 -0. 5� Easement Closin -- Pittman Poe & Associates A request for review of a closing of a mutual access easement as recorded in the office of the Tulsa County Clerk in Book 5709, Page 611 -,.614 and generally described as a portion of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter (E /2 SCI /4) of Section 18, Township 21Ny Range 14E, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. The subject property is located north of E. 96 "' Street N. and west of N. Garnett Road. (Ward 1) Donna presented the itern. The mutual access easement was established to ensure future access through Coventry Gardens along N. 102 E Avenue to a 15 -acre tract reserved for a future school site. The school site has been relocated and the subsequent platting of Loney Creek has rendered the easement obsolete. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the closing request and no comments regarding the easement were recorded. Staff recommends approval of the closing of the Mutual Access Easement. Ray Haynes moved to approve the easement closing request, Dewey Brown seconded the motion. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows; Ray Haynes - Yes Bill Alison _. Yes Charles Willey -- Yes Bill Williams --- Yes Dewey Brown - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 6. Easement A request for review of a closing of certain utility easements as recorded in the office of the Tulsa County Clerk in Book 3926, Page 245 -255 and described as a portion of Country Estates IV, City of Owasso, Tulsa County, States of Oklahoma. The subject property is located north of E. 116 "' Street N. and west of N. Garnett Road. (Ward 1) The location of the property was described. The motivation for the recording of the easements to be closed are unclear. The easements are vacant and unused. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the closing request and had no comments. Staff recommends approval of the closing of the Mutual Access Easement. Ray Haynes moved to approve the easement closing, Bill Williams seconded. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: O ASSO PLANNING COMMISSION Larch 12, 2002 Page Nom 5 Ray Haynes Yes Pill Alison -- Yes Charles Willey -- Yes Bill Williams - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes The motion carried 5.0. 7. Site Plan - _QgikT #/42 -- A request for review of a site plan for QuikTrip #62R, described as Lot 1, Block 1, QuikTrip Commercial Center #62R, and located south of E. 116 "' Street N. (State Highway 20) between U.S. Highway 169 and N. 14.5 " E Avenue. (Ward 1) Donna presented the item to the Commissioners and described the subject property location. The applicant is proposing a 4,600 square foot convenience store facility. The applicant has provided ample parking spaces. One loading berth is required by code for this facility and has been provided. No screen fencing is required, as the property does not abut a residential district. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the site plan with the following comments: * Coordinate directly with the Owasso Fire Department for hydrant location(s). ® Ground - mounted signage along U.S. Highway 169 corridor should be moved north so as not to interfere with overhead PSG lines. Donna explained that the applicant is addressing these issues and coordinating; with the Fire Department and PSO. Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan for QuikTrip #62R. Ray Haynes moved to approve the site plan request subject to the 'Technical .Advisory Committee requirements, Dill Williams seconded the motion. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bill Ellison -- Yes Charles Willey - Yes Bill Williams _ Yes Dewey Brown - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 8. Reports on monthly building permit activity. 9. Report on planning items previously forwarded to City Council. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 2002 Page No. 6 10. Discussion on development in and near Owasso. 11, Adjournment ..... bill Ellison moved, Dewey Brown seconded, to adjourn the meeting, A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes Yes Bill Ellison Yes Charles Willey -- Yes Bill Williams - Yes Dewey Brown -- Yes 'rhe motion carried 5- -0,and the meeting was adjourned at 8;45 PM, �r Chairpersdr ) Seer &tary Dat6 PE'RIFION Pe-01-RH " -) -, 'r 01= - 0 2 -, 0 C------- As res4cvas of Owasso yc pe%whe City of owasso to ii,--whudkc a 'hou-111-6r ofnn) buss flha-n. 150 Ad lhronn. t1iit-, prcpeny We of Caudle States. This bul"I"er -is incinde trc �-s and 1 andskca pin g 1,1-hatt wd 1 govi de the ;max W-ru.n.- no Jes"s th"'ubi-. � n, "eigh.a-4-out concrete wall, e ght- - i ficm,,-A! privacy or c.J.0ht-t- o,,,, Owl Me, W(.--, alls,;� Me! the Cjpv of'Owasso riot allh,-a w any nir pool ha` g. o IIc,-I'.-,.,.- be a.I-I,,ow,,,,d nw3 This .,.la-, i-iow or ,ikni zhe 2PE.'ll-ITIO As ry s- e Ytv OF Owasso we r;,,,.,35t-.,,sa the CRy of ( f sso.s to .nom,,. ,$de„ a ` .i. "e,; -, a °,s ;r¢a' , a 5 1 a a c� q+3� :sa;3 v fi 4a ?dsca ini hu -',it -d' asa .o v : � .b -.atf� ii-nv�a ot"c- a .,r,. 4i ;a , .�,n_�,. ` .� �s Yg - v -reques-1, no s - a.a,a mn eigfiit- se Of. c.e t- r';,a c:a} ,s,.._,o o privacy r ,c," ,..art r>b�y ..a,. - c - a y� .',�,. We,, sorW 'ne-A:a.,3,..a.:. =a. Opy o ::vivassio .v °a,�.s,xn. �r - -a� s .x a a a aif.s .ka, s rig, �� ,i;� � ., „ z.. ,,,,, a.,,� .,t.a,. �x � a„ ?A ,..ate, �,.,,, ta,r >.. ayi DA .. _ B , I_� a :7 ,.r i9r �.� a5. 1: s - .1?I�' -•✓ -F ✓,;' -- �' i .,�!' Lr, s EQ.. f ' f" °_, i d. %es' , -- � � 7 s K w.'y �� a �0 quo dw"....,� ✓ .__ .� 1'4'J k 1 � P4, — — s J i�^ ✓�.-�H 4t,(!� ,��/�1 �s.�J/y.€lT _a� }?�.brrur'j� r ! — -- WF ✓, ✓�,.,a °"y i�•s> -°� tea.. d' s b✓ .�.y r i i � �� i .�= ,��_si.�� t- �- ; -`=3�� ..�d.�-- ."-:e— _.9 Li .L�.� � s- $' ".... ] � ,� � c'. 4 &� G � " -.. ✓'�� a.�.. R " "'4 � .1'� f ._—