HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014.06.10_Worksession AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE REC
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL, OPWA, AND OPGA E��Ep
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular JUN 0 6 201¢ 7
DATE: June 10, 2014 cityCift.s
TIME: 6:00 pm
PLACE: Old Central Building
109 N Birch
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 6:00 pm on Friday, June 6, 2014.��
Sherry BisheK City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jeri Moberly
2. Presentation and discussion of Open Meeting and Open Records Act
Julie Lombardi
3. Discussion relating to Community Development items
Bronce Stephenson
Attachment #3
A. Annexation and Rezoning - Rejoice School Campus
B. Proposed Amendment - Cell Tower Zoning Code
C. Land Use Master Plan
4. Discussion relating to Finance Department items
Linda Jones
Attachment #4
A. Red Flag Policy Update
B. Proposed Water Rate Increase due to City of Tulsa Increase
5. Discussion relating to Capital Improvement Projects - Priority Determination
Teresa Willson
Attachment #5
6. Discussion relating to IT Department items - Website Presentation
Teresa Willson
7. Discussion relating to Barking Dog Nuisance Citizen Complaint
Julie Lombardi
B. Discussion relating to Board and Committee Appointments
Mayor Moberly
Owasso City Council
June 10, 2014
Page 2
9. Discussion relating to City Manager items
Warren Lehr
Attachment #9
• Proposed FYI Budget
• Fireworks Displays - City of Owasso and Stone Canyon
• Possible Land Transfer from Owasso Schools
• Sales Tax Report
• City Manager Report
10. Report from City Councilors
11. Adjournment
n—Tity win oun Lim if s.
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Bronce L. Stephenson
Jurisdiction
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:
Annexation & Rezoning - Rejoice Christian School
DATE:
June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso received an application for review and approval of an annexation and
rezoning request for a property to the north of the planned location of the Rejoice Christian
School. The subject property is located west of the west service road area of US] 69 and north of
E 1061h St North.
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Direction
Zoning
Use
Land Use Plan
Jurisdiction
North
AG
Undeveloped
Commercia l
City of
Within PUD?
(Agriculture)
Within Overla District ?'
US -169 Overlay
Owasso
South
OM (Office
School
Transitional
City of
Medium
Owasso
East
AO
US -169
Transitional
City of
(Agriculture)
Owasso
CS
Undeveloped
City of
West
(Commercial
(Planned for
Commercial
Owasso &
Shopping)
School )
Tulsa Count
SUBJECT PROPERTY /PROJECT DATA:
Property Size
15.26 acres
Current Zoning
AG Tulsa Count
Proposed Use
OM - Office Medium -
School
Lots /Blocks '
N/A
Number of Reserve Areas
N/A
Within PUD?
N/A
Within Overla District ?'
US -169 Overlay
Water Provider
Washington County Rural
Water #3
-Applicable Pa backs
Storm siren fee of $35 /acre
Streets (public or private
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Rejoice Christian School is developing a campus along the west side of US -169 just north of E
1061h St N. As the vision for the campus has grown, more parcels of land have been obtained.
This annexation request would bring a parcel of land to the north of the planned campus into
City Limits to allow the campus to extend farther north. The City of Owasso can adequately
serve all infrastructure and safety needs for the subject property.
The applicant is also requesting the rezoning of the subject property. Typically, when a property
is annexed into City Limits it is assigned an AG (Agriculture) zoning designation, but as a part of
this application the property is requested to be zoned OM (Office Medium). Assigning this
zoning designation will allow for the planned development of the Rejoice Christian School. The
property is currently undeveloped, but is planned to be the home of the Rejoice Christian School
campus. Rezoning the subject property to Office Medium would allow for the construction and
development of the school campus and would allow the school to develop as an allowed use in
the zoning district. This would allow all future site development approvals to take place at the
administrative level, rather than require special approval by the City Council. The rezoning
request would be in compliance with the Land Use Master Plan, which calls for transitional uses in
the area. The area to the west of the subject property is already zoned for commercial use,
which allows a school by right. After the rezoning of the subject property, all areas of the
planned campus would be zoned appropriately for 'by right' development.
Any development that occurs on the subject property must adhere to all subdivision, zoning,
and engineering requirements including but not limited to paved streets, landscaping, and
sidewalks. The City of Owasso will provide sanitary sewer service.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The Owasso 2025 Land Use Master Plan identifies the subject property and its surroundings as
having a future land use of Transitional. The proposed rezoning to Office Medium will be in
conformance with the Land Use Master Plan, as office uses are allowed in transitional areas.
ANNEXATION COMMITTEE:
The Owasso Annexation Committee met on May 28, 2014 and voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the annexation request.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Owasso Planning Commission will review this item at their regular meeting on June 9, 2014.
ATTACHMENTS:
Area Map
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
Land Use Map
Annexation /Rezoning
iJ
f
L
1
69;
f
rl'i
- 1
_
-
111th q,N
I
y
J
I
f
i
R
f
1{1
l 69
I
+ i
f I
ICI
I
I
f
0 o f6
1" = 752 ft
#OA -14 -011
04/30/2014
y
r
w%
#OZ -14 -03
This map represents a visual display of related geographic Information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to-date Information.
Annexation /Rezoning
#OA -14 -01 / �^
1" = 752 ft 04/3012014
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to -date information.
Land Use
1" = 752 ft 06/06/2014Y��
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy.
please contact Owasso staff for the most up -to -date Inform atlon.
Zoning
y 1 r�
1" = 752 ft 06/06/2014 'fl
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To he sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to -date information.
nT VA"
ity Wit out Limits.
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Telecommunication Tower Ordinance
DATE: June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department has been working on an update to the existing
zoning code language dealing with the regulation of telecommunication towers. The City has
had language in place for a number of years, but after an analysis of the existing regulations,
staff has found that Owasso's regulations are significantly stricter than others in the region. Staff
has amended the current regulations to allow for a competitive atmosphere for
telecommunication providers and to ensure quality phone and data service to Owasso
residents.
The attached draft shows strikethroughs for deleted language and underline for added
language. The changes to the ordinance make two (2) major changes to the current
regulations.
The first change reduces the distance requirement between towers from one mile to'' /z mile. At
the time that this ordinance was originally adopted the telecommunication industry was very
different and not only had fewer carriers, but also had much different needs for data and
cellular coverage. Due mainly to the increasing need for data service, telecommunication
equipment needs to be placed at a higher density to meet customer demand. Staff finds that
Y
z mile separation does not have a great impact because each tower has to provide space for
at least four (4) other companies to co- locate, reducing the needs for duplicate towers in an
area.
The next major change is the required distance from residential structures. The new language
provides for a 2:1 distance to tower height ratio from any residential structure. The old language
required a 3:1 distance separation, but as towers are traditionally 150 feet and taller, this made
finding a location quite difficult.
There are other small changes to increase screening fence requirements and to make a 200 foot
tower the maximum possible, collectively making a much stronger and more competitive set of
telecommunication standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Planning Commission will review this language at their regular meeting on June 9, 2014 and
will make a recommendation to the City Council.
ATTACHMENT:
Draft - Telecommunication Tower Regulations
CHAPTER 15
TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS AND SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS
1510 Definitions
1520 Telecommunication Towers
1530 Small Wind Energy Systems
SECTION 1510 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the
meaning ascribed to them as follows:
1. The term "telecommunications tower" means a structure more than ten feet
tall, built primarily to support one or more telecommunications antennas.
2. The term "telecommunications" means the transmission, between or among
points specified by the user, or information of the user's choosing, without
change in the form or content or information as sent and received.
3. The term "telecommunications service" means the offering of
telecommunications for a fee directly to the public, or to such classes of users
as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities
used.
4. The term "antenna" means any structure or device used to collect or radiate
electromagnetic waves, including both directional antennas, such as panels or
dishes, and omni- directional antennas, such as whips, but not including
satellite earth stations.
5. The term "telecommunications antenna" means an antenna used to provide a
telecommunications service.
6. The term "antenna array" means a structure attached to a telecommunication
tower that supports telecommunication antennas.
7. The term "whip antenna" means an omni- directional dipole antenna of
cylindrical shape that is no more than six inches in diameter.
8. The term "non whip antenna" means an antenna that is not a whip antenna,
such as dish antennas, panel antennas, etc.
9. The term "EIA -222" means Electronic Industries Association Standard 222,
"Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Support
Structures"
10. The term "historically significant landscapes" and "architecturally significant
structures" shalt apply to those areas identified as such within the National
Register of Historic Places.
SECTION 1520 TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS
(A) NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUIRED
(1) Permitted By Right - Telecommunication towers are a permitted use in
all CG, CH, IL, IM, and IH if proposed towers satisfy the following
requirements. Telecommunication towers permitted under this
subsection may exceed compatibility and base district height
restrictions.
(a) Aesthetic Protection
Telecommunication facilities shall be so located to ensure that
historically significant landscapes are protected. The views of
vistas from architecturally and /or historically significant
structures should not be impaired or diminished by the placement
of telecommunication facilities.
(b) Setback
Tower shall be a minimum of MO' distance to tower height
from any R 3residential ^F meFe restrie*^ve- dirt. iet structure.
(c) Height
Tower height, excluding antenna array, does not exceed:
feet, - 00 feet but less than 250
.. feet, . Irt
Festrirtiv 200 feet.
(d) Antenna Array Height
The antenna array does not exceed the tower height by more than
10 feet.
(e) Setback of Guy Wires
All guy wires and guy anchors are setback a minimum of 20 feet
from any property line.
(f) Tower Type
The tower is of monopole design, or one of equal or lesser impact,
if located within 350' of any RS -3 or more restrictive district.
(g) Co- Location
A telecommunication tower must be designed and built so as to be
capable of use by at least three -five 5 wireless communication
providers such as cellular or PCS providers using antenna arrays of
9 to 12 antennas each within 15 vertical feet of each other with
no more than three degrees twist and sway at the top elevation.
The owner of the tower and the property on which the tower is
located must certify to the City that the antenna is available for
use by at least twe -four other wireless telecommunication
providers on a reasonable and nondiscriminatory basis and at a
cost not exceeding the market value for the use of the facilities.
If the property on which the tower is proposed to be located is to
be leased, the portions of the actual or proposed lease that
demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this paragraph
shall be submitted with the building permit application.
(h) Security Fencing
The base of tower is enclosed by an 8 foot opaque security
feNG�agfence.
(i) Compliance with Applicable Regulations
The tower is constructed and operated in compliance with current
Federal Communication Commission and other applicable federal
and state standards.
(j) Neighborhood Impact
The proposed tower location will not cause a negative impact on
any residential neighborhood. In determining neighborhood
impact, the Director shall consider the opinion of record property
owners within 300', but the Director shall not be bound by such
opinions expressed.
(k) Removal of Tower
Upon the discontinuance of use of any such tower for a period of
thirty (30) days, said tower is to be removed by the
applicant/ owner.
(2) Replacement of Existing Poles - Telecommunication towers erected to
replace existing poles are permitted in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(3)
(4)
(a) The pole replaced is a functioning utility pole or light standard
within an established utility easement or public right -of -way,
recreational facility light pole, or telecommunication tower.
(b) Replacement tower height, including antenna array does not
exceed:
(1) The height of the original utility, light standard, or
recreational facility light pole by more than 10 feet; or
(2) The height of the original telecommunication tower and
antenna array.
(c) The pole replaced does not obstruct a public sidewalk, public
alley, or other public right -of -way, and
(d) Pole appearance and function, except for antenna, are not
significantly altered.
Placement on Existing Poles - permitted in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(a) Telecommunication antenna
lighting, telecommunication
exceeding 50 feet in height.
s are permitted on existing utility,
towers, and sign structures at or
(b) Provided that the antenna does not exceed the height of the
structure by more than ten (10) feet if a non -whip type or fifteen
(15) feet if a whip type.
(c) Telecommunication antennas located on existing structures are
not subject to the X0001 /2 mile -feet separation requirement.
(d) If any additions, changes, or modifications are to be made to the
monopole, the Director of Community Development shall have the
authority to require proof, through the submission of engineering
and structural data, that the addition, change, or modification
conforms to structural wind load and all other requirements of
the current Building Code adopted by the City of Owasso.
Roof Mounted Telecommunication Antennas - allowed on non - residential
buildings in all districts, provided that:
(a) Non -whip antennas do not exceed the height of the building by
more than ten (10) feet and is screened from view from any
adjacent public roadway.
(b) Whip antennas do not exceed the height of the building by more
than fifteen (15) feet and are located no closer than fifteen (15)
feet to the perimeter of the building.
Prior to the installation of a roof mounted antenna, the
Community Development Department shalt be provided with an
engineer's certification that the roof will support the proposed
antenna and associated roof - mounted antennas and equipment.
Roof mounted antennas and associated equipment may either be
screened with enclosures or facades having an appearance that
blends with the building on which they are located or by locating
them so they are not visible from an adjacent public roadway.
(5) Building Mounted Telecommunication Antennas of the nonwhip type are
allowed on non - residential buildings in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(a) The antenna is mounted flush with the exterior of the building so
that it projects no more than 30 inches from the surface of the
building to which it is attached.
(b) The antenna's appearance is such as to blend with the
surrounding surface of the building.
(c) Associated equipment shall be place either within same building
or in a separate building that matches the existing building in
character and materials or blends with landscaping and other
surrounding material adjacent to the separate building housing
the equipment. Associated equipment for roof mounted antennas
may be located on the roof of the building if it is screened from
view from any adjacent public roadway.
(6) When an application for a building permit to locate a telecommunication
antenna on an existing building or other structure is made, the
Community Development Department shall be provided with color photo
simulations showing the site of the existing structure with a photo -
realistic representation of the proposed antenna and the existing
structure as it would appear viewed from the closest residential
property. The applicant shall also submit photographs of the same views
showing current appearance of the site without the proposed antenna.
(7) Distance Measurement - distances in this section shall be measured along
a single straight line between the center of the tower base and the
nearest point on any property line of identified historic property or RS-3
or more restrictive district or use. For the purposes of applying
restrictions set forth in this section, "RS -3 or more restrictive zoning
district or use" excludes property that is:
(a) Used as public or private primary or secondary educational
facility;
(b) Used as a college or university educational facility;
Owned by the US, State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, or the City of
Owasso, and not used for RS -3 or more restrictive residential uses;
Used primarily for religious assembly;
Used as a cemetery;
Occupied by non - residential, non - conforming uses; or
Any other site similar to those listed above and determined by the
Director of Community Development to be consistent with the
purposes of this section.
(8) Exceptions and Exemptions
(a) A telecommunication tower that fails to meet the requirements of
this section may be authorized by obtaining a Specific Use Permit
through the Owasso Planning Commission.
(b) Towers erected by a public agency for police, fire, EMS, 911 or
other similar public emergency communication shall be exempt
from the requirements of this section.
(B) SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUIRED
(1) This section is designed to encourage placement of telecommunication
towers in permitted areas. If a proposed telecommunication tower is
not to be located in a permitted by right district, a Specific Use Permit
is required.
(2) All Specific Use Permit requests for telecommunication towers may be so
authorized by the Planning Commission, subject to the following
additional requirements:
(a) Setback from Historical Property
The tower shalt not be on, or within 300 feet, or property
recognized as a historical property or a property of historical
significance.
(b) Setbacks General
The telecommunication tower must be a minimum of 200 feet, or
3-2 to 1 distance to height ratio, whichever is greater, from
strwet, z I;°a f^- PeSideRtial puFpases residential structures.
(c) Height
Tower -
..
.. tewer .. feet, but less thaR 299
.. ..
00 -
00
(d) Array Height
The antenna array shall not exceed the tower height by more than
10 feet.
(e) Guy Wires
All guy and guy wires shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from
any property line.
(f) Monopole Required
Any tower within 200 feet of any RS -3 or more restrictive district
shall be of a monopole design, or one of equal or lesser impact.
(g) Security Fencing
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by security fencing at a
height of 8 feet. The fencing shall be opaque.
(h) Compliance with Applicable Regulations
The tower is constructed and operated in compliance with the
current Federal Communications Commission and other applicable
federal and state standards.
(i) Distance from Other Towers
New telecommunication towers must be a minimum distance of
5,009 f 1/2 mile from any other telecommunication tower;
unless ; a by Fight diStFiGt
(j) Removal of Tower
Upon the discontinuance of use of any such tower for a period of
thirty (30) days, said tower is to be removed by the
applicant /owner.
0 Mp
The City Wit out Limits.
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Bronce L. Stephenson
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:
GrOwasso 2030 Land Use Master Plan
DATE:
June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department has been working on an update to the current Land
Use Master Plan for approximately 18 months, utilizing a steering committee made up of elected
and appointed officials, staff, and volunteer citizens from the community. This update to the
Master Plan, titled GrOwasso 2030 Land Use Master Plan, provides a more current view of
anticipated growth patterns.
This item was discussed at the May work session, with input provided to staff. This is another
opportunity for Council input now that the Council has had a month to review the document.
The draft plan is currently out for public review on the City website.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on June 9, 2014 to solicit public input. A
public hearing before the City Council is planned for June 17, 2014 to solicit additional input.
ATTACHMENT:
*Draft of GrOwasso 2030 Plan was provided to the Council at May 13, 2014 work session
n—Tity Wit out Limits.
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Councilors
City of Owasso
FROM: Linda Jones
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Red Flag Rules
identity Theft Prevention
DATE: June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
On January 1, 2008, congressional legislation regarding The Red Flag Rule went into effect
requiring all public utilities and all governmental agencies to have an identity theft plan in place
by November 1, 2008.
In compliance with the new legislation, the City of Owasso, the Owasso Public Works Authority,
and the Owasso Public Golf Authority adopted Resolution No. 2009 -03 outlining the identity theft
prevention program which includes the following:
Procedures to identify patterns, practices, and specific forms of activity that
indicate the possible existence of identity theft;
Semi - annual performance of a risk assessment of all internal operations where
identity theft is possible; and
Periodic revision of the program to reflect changes in risk.
Program administration requires
• Governing Body to approve the written identity theft prevention program;
• Governing Body to designate a senior manager to oversee the implementation
and administration of the program; and
• Staff to receive formal training on the implementation of the program.
Ongoing requirements:
Complete a periodic review of the Program's operations;
Conduct an Incident Review of all Red Flag events that occurred during the last 6
months to include actions taken to limit customer exposure and any preventive
measures put in place; and
Write an Annual Report tc
taken during the year.
ANNUAL REPORT:
the Governing Body to report findings and actions
Red Flag procedures were reviewed on November 30, 2013, and again on May 16, 2014. No
breach of confidential customer personal identifying information or suspected identity theft was
detected over the past year. The semi- annual report is attached.
ATTACHMENT:
Red Flag Policy Semi - Annual Review
Red Flag Policy Semi - Annual Review
May 16, 2014
BACKGROUND:
Identity theft is a serious problem in the United States. To combat the problem, as part of the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (the FACT Act), the Federal Trade Commission
and several other federal agencies have issued rules requiring creditors (including municipalities
under certain circumstances) to develop, adopt and implement written Identity Theft Prevention
Programs. The Programs were required to be in place by May 1, 2009. The rules are often
referred to as RED FLAG requirements and apply to financial institutions and municipalities that
provide utility services and /or other services for which payment is made in arrears. It is the
provision of services on a deferred payment basis that makes a municipality a "creditor" as
defined under Red Flags.
ACTION TAKEN:
The City of Owasso adopted Resolution No. 2009 -03 to help protect identity theft and fight theft of
customer account information, and provide procedures that identify, detect, and respond to
possible signals of identity theft known as Red Flags.
As a result, the following list of security enhancements are enforced to ensure the security of
customer information:
1) Only allow for applications for service to be made in person;
2) Verify the identification of existing customers if they request information in person, via
telephone, via facsimile, or via e -mail.
3) Verify identification of existing customers when requesting to transfer service, change
account status, change mailing address, or to terminate service;
4) Verify proof of ownership /lease agreement
5) Require proper identification when a customer presents a Credit or Debit Card for
payment if the name is on the card is different from the name on the utility account.
ANNUAL REPORT:
Red Flag procedures were reviewed on November 30, 2013, and again on May 16, 2014. No
breach of confidential customer personal identifying information or suspected identity theft was
detected over the past year.
nTity Wit out Limits.
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Trustees
Owasso Public Works Authority
FROM: Linda Jones
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Water Rate Increase
DATE: June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND
The Owasso Public Works Authority purchases treated water from the City of Tulsa. On March 31,
2014, the City of Tulsa notified Owasso of a water rate increase effective October 1, 2014. Rates
for water purchased by the OPWA from the City of Tulsa will increase from $2.96 to $3.17 per
1,000 gallons. Tulsa water is delivered to Owasso through three master meters. The monthly
meter charge will also increase from $450.05 to $481.56 for a monthly meter fee increase of
$31.51.
In order for the City to recover the increased cost of service, staff proposes a rate increase of
twenty -one cents per thousand gallons of water usage to customers inside the city limits plus the
respective monthly increase based on the size of meter. Staff further proposes that rates for
customers outside the city limits continue to be 20% more than rates for customers within the city
limits in accordance with the previous OPWA resolution establishing the different rate structures
for customers outside the city limits.
The proposed minimum volume charge per 1,000 gallons of water usage would increase from
$4.81 to $5.02 for customers inside the city. The monthly cost of the proposed rate increase to a
city customer who uses 7,000 gallons of water with a 3/<" meter would be $1.47 per month or
$17.64 per year, an amount equal to the Tulsa rate increase. The proposed increase for rural
customers using 7,000 gallons per month would be $1.75 or $21.00 per year.
Rate changes require the approval of the Owasso Public Works Authority and the Owasso City
Council through Trustee Resolution and City Council Ordinance.
PROPOSED ACTION:
Staff will recommend City Council approval of an ordinance and OPWA Trustee approval of a
resolution increasing the water rates to be effective October 1, 2014.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed draft OPWA Resolution
Letter from City of Tulsa
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY ESTABLISHING WATER
SERVICE RATES WITHIN AND WITHOUT THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Owasso Public Works Authority desires to establish the following rates for the
provision of water service effective October 1, 2014:
for
Meter Size
Users Inside the
Corporate Limits
"''Users Outside the
Corporate Limits
3/4"
11.50
1 3.80
1 "
12.40
$14.88
1 '/z "
14.40
$17.28
2"
$15.40
` 18:48
3"
30.40
36:48x,
4"
35.40
42.48
6"
$50.40
60.48
Hydrant
75.00
NA
Usage Tier Rates
'Volume Rate
er 1,000 gallons
Users Inside the,
Cor "''orate Limits=
Users Outside the
Corporate Limits
First 1,000 gallons '
Minimum Meter Charge','
Minimum Meter Charge
2,000 gallons ' :
5,62
E $6.02
3,000 - 5,000 gallons
�r n7
WHEREAS, The Owasso Public Works Authority desires to establish the following rates, fees
and stipulations for metered fire hydrant water usage:
• Deposit per meter of $750.00
• Minimum Meter Charge of $75.00
• Non- refundable service initiation fee of $10.00
• Water usage rate based on aforementioned tiered rate system
• Penalty for failure to report meter readings by the tenth (101h) day of
each month of $25.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OWASSO PUBLIC
WORKS AUTHORITY. THAT:
Section One: From and after the effective date of this Resolution (as hereinafter set forth),
the charge by the Authority for water service shall be adjusted in
accordance with the above - referenced recital paragraphs and as
specifically codified pursuant to Ordinance No. XX of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma ( "City ").
Section Two: The water rates established pursuant to the Resolution shall become
effective with the first utility billing cycle in October 2014.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 171h DAY OF JUNE, 2014.
ATTEST:
Sherry Bishop, Authority Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie Lombardi, Authority Attorney
THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
Jeri Moberly, Chairman
2
March 31, 2014
Mr, Roger Stevens, Public Works Director
City of Owasso
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055 -0180
Clayton Edwards, Director
WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
RE: Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 Tulsa Wholesale Water Rates
Dear Mr. Stevens:
The City of Tulsa and Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority (TMUA) endeavor to ensure clear, timely and
accurate communications with the communities to which we supply water, including the City of Owasso.
Review and refinement of the Water Department's FY 14 -15 operating and capital budgets is underway,
but the budgets on which Tulsa's City Council have been briefed anticipate approval of the proposed
Increase cited below, if approved, the new rates will be effective October 1, 2014. This letter is to give
you sufficient notice to plan for the rate changes in your next budget cycle.
The current rates and proposed increase for FY 2014 -2015 are shown in the table below.
Monthly Service Charge / Volume Charqe
Meter Size
Current Rates
Effective
10/0112013
Proposed FY
2014-2015%
Chan a
Proposed FY
2014 -2015
Rates
518"
$ 6.83
7,0
$ 7.31
V
$ 8.51
7.0
$ 9.11
1'/ :"
$10.17
7.0
$10.88
2"
$ 14,85
7.0
$ 15.89
3"
$ 43.25
7.0
$ 46.28
4"
$ 60.21
7.0
$ 64.42
6"
$ 93,85
7.0
$ 100.42
8"
$ 130.79
1 7.0
$ 139.95
10"
$ 178.10
7.0
$ 190.57
Volume Char a er 1 000 gallons
Permanent Service
$ 2.96
7.0
$ 3.17
Limited Term Service
$ 5.26
7.0
$ 5.63
Emergency Service
$ 9.57
7.0
$ 10.24
A listing of your active meters and accounts Is attached. We will inform you once the rates and the fiscal
year 2015 budgets are approved. I can be reached at 918-596-7810 should you have any questions, or
contact Utilities Services Manager Mark Weathers at 918 - 596 -9550.
Best Regards,
CITY LSA WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
Clayton dWards, P.E., Director
Attachment
CITY HALL AT ONE TECHNOLOGY CENTER.
175 E. 2 "d Street, Suite 885, Tulsa, OK 74103 Office (918) 596. 9550 Fax 918- 699 -3358
Email: mwenthers(✓cityoftulsa.org
wa,w.cllyof1u1sa.org
Customer Name
Account
Status
IServiceAddress
{MeterNumberl
Type
ISize
CITY OF OWASSO
10368888
Active
7595 N MINGO RD
DUR0141654
71
110"
CITY OF OWASSO
10368888
Active
7595 N MINGO RD
NPR0141620 !
71
i6"
CITY OF OWASSO
10368888 j
Active
17695 N MINGO RD
NP/70141654
71
10"
CITY OF OWASSO
10557536 1
Active
110600 N SHERIDAN RD
_
NP/70190282
71
20"
Z\Utgitles wa spaweq UtilitiesS jwsM ga�Ms Metersl,q W fta Nester Pmperty- s%=er Listinghl"x- F Maner Melw
nTity Wit ouf Limits.
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Owasso
FROM:
Teresa Willson
Information Technology Director
SUBJECT:
Capital Improvements Priority Determination
DATE:
June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
Adopted by the City Council in September 2003, Resolution 2003 -14 establishes the procedure
for amending the priority determination of capital improvement projects eligible to receive
funding from the Capital Improvements Fund, also known as the permanent third -penny sales
tax.
First, the Capital Improvements Committee (CIP) conducts a public meeting to consider
proposed amendments to the priority determination of projects proposed to be funded by the
third -penny sales tax. Following such consideration, the Capital Improvements Committee shall
provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed amendment.
Next, the City Council conducts a public hearing in order to receive and consider citizen input
relevant to the recommendation made by the Capital Improvements Committee and the
proposed amendment to the list of project priorities eligible to receive funding from the third -
penny sales tax. Notice of the public hearing must be made no less than five days prior to the
public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must continue the
matter for at least two weeks before taking any action to amend the project priority listing. Any
action taken by the City Council to amend the current list of priority projects must be made by
adopting a resolution.
CURRENT PROJECT PRIORITIES:
Adopted July 16, 2013, Resolution 2013 -13 designated the following list of projects as priorities
eligible for funding from the Capital Improvements Fund:
• East 86th Street North Widening Project (Main to Memorial)
• East 106th Street North and North Garnett Road Intersection Improvements
• East and West Service Roads between East 66th Street North and East 126th Street North
• East 76th Street North Widening Project from Hwy 169 to North 129th East Avenue
• Garnett Road Widening Project from East 96th Street North to East 106th Street North
• Annual Street Rehabilitation Program
• East 96th Street North and North 129th East Avenue Infrastructure Improvements
• Elm Creek Park Improvements
• Sportspark
• Vehicle Maintenance Facility
• Main Police Station
• New City Hall
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
On May 27, 2014, the Capital Improvements Committee held a Special Meeting in accordance
with Resolution 2003 -14 and provisions of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act to consider a
recommendation to the Owasso City Council amending the current list of projects funded
through the Capital Improvements Fund.
Public Works Director Roger Stevens presented information to the Capital Improvements
Committee in consideration of a one -time capital prioritization recommendation for the
widening of the intersection at 116th Street North and 129th East Avenue. Detailed rationale for
this request is included in the attached memorandum dated May 22, 2014.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the Capital Improvements Committee voted unanimously to
submit a recommendation to the Owasso City Council amending the priority determination to
include the following project:
i Intersection of t 16th Street North and 1291h East Avenue
PUBLIC HEARING:
In accordance with the procedure for amending the priority determination of capital
improvement projects, the City Council must conduct a public hearing in order to receive and
consider citizen input relevant to the recommendation made by the Capital Improvements
Committee. The public hearing is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, June 17, 2014. Information
regarding the public hearing and the recommendation of the Capital Improvements
Committee has been placed on the city's website.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 2003 -14
Staff Memorandum to the CIP Committee dated May 22, 2014
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -I4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA, ESTABLISHING AN AMENDATORY PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING
PRIORITY DETERMINATIONS PREVIOUSLY MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS
RELATES TO UTILIZATION OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE EXCISE TAX LEVIED
BY ORDINANCE NO.763,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA, THAT TO WIT:
Amendment to Priority Determination for utilization of the proceeds of the excise tax levied by
Ordinance No. 763, shall be accomplished in the following manner, to wit:
A. The proposal for amendment to the Priority Determination shall be presented to the
Capital Improvements Committee, in a regular or special meeting thereof, called,
noticed and held in accordance with the provisions of the Oklahoma Open Meeting
Act, 25 O.S. 301, et req. The Capital Improvements Committee, in such public
meeting, shall consider all matters deemed relevant by it to the proposed
amendment to Priority Determination and at the conclusion of such consideration it
shall make a recommendation thereon to the City Council.
B. Prior to the City Council consideration of the Capital Improvement Committee's
recommendation and the proposed amendment to the Priority Determination. The
City Council, during a regular or special meeting thereof called, noticed and held in
accordance with the provisions of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 301 et
req., shall conduct a public hearing thereon. In addition to such notice as may be
required under the provisions of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 301 et
req., notice of such public hearing shall be published once in a newspaper of general
circulation not less than five (5) calendar days prior to such public hearing.
C. During the course of the public hearing, the City Council shall receive and consider
such information as deemed by the City Council relevant to the proposed
amendment to Priority Determination.
D. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council shall, after discussion on
the proposed amendment, continue the matter for a period of not less than two (2)
weeks to a date, time and place certain for continued consideration of same. At such
time, the City Council shall take such action as it deems appropriate on the
proposed amendment. Any action taken shall ultimately be set forth by way of
Resolution. The date of adoption of said Resolution of the proposed amendment to
Priority Determinations shall be deemed the effective date.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2i' day of September, 2003 by the City Council of the
City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
' �` T e� N
OFFICIAL
`,. Gary ochran, Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
St P. Gray, C Art ey
nTity W t Limits.
TO: Capital Improvements Committee
City of Owasso
From: Roger Stevens
Public Works Director
Subject: East 1 16th Street North /North 129th East Avenue Intersection Improvements
Date: May 22, 2014
BACKGROUND:
The E 1 16th St N and N 1291h E Ave intersection is a heavily trafficked area that conveys residential
and commercial traffic, as well as commuter traffic to and from Owasso. This roadway
accommodates a large percentage of local traffic and is significant in the distribution of traffic
to and from the Collinsville and to commercial areas near Hwy 169 and E 116th St N. With the
continued residential and commercial growth in the area, Tulsa County and City of Owasso
have been discussing potential funding options and construction timelines.
A proposed solution involves a joint partnership in order to share costs relating to the planning
and construction phase of E 116th St N and N 1291h E Ave intersection improvements. Funding for
the project would be through the ODOT Surface Transportation Program which provides federal
funds in the amount of 80% for the construction cost and requires a 20% local match (City of
Owasso /Tulsa County).
INTERSECTION COMPARISON:
Since the last CIP meeting, a committee member requested information relating to how this
project rated in terms of vehicle traffic and accidents compared to the existing intersections on
the CIP priority list. The comparison information is provided in the table below:
Location
North /South
East /West
Vehicle Accidents
Injury Accident
Vehicles per day
Vehicles per day
(Since 2002)
(Since 2002)
E 1 16th St /N 1291h E
Ave
1,297/2,647
12,903/12,631
82
41
E 1061' St /N 145111 E
Ave
3,465/3,886
4,794/7,268
14
3
E 96111 St /N 1451h E
Ave
4,058/5,543
4,981/7,530
13
4
E 961h St /N 97th E
Ave
3,256/5,047
5,274/372
19
6
SCOPE OF WORK:
The proposed intersection improvements would include five lanes plus a right turn lane on all
legs on the intersection. The roadway improvements will extend in each direction nearly 700 feet
from the intersection. The storage bays for each left turn lane will be 250 feet. The intersection will
be signalized. The estimated project cost is $4.1 million which includes engineering, land
acquisition, utility relocation and construction costs.
As mentioned, ODOT funding for this project will be sought through the Surface Transportation
Program, which will fund 80% of eligible project costs, while the local government funds the
remaining 20 %. Based upon this information, the following is an estimate of the cost distribution:
Project Segment
Estimate
ODOT
Portion
Tulsa County
City of Owasso
0 millions)
($ millions)
Portion
Portion
Construction
$2.80
$2.20
$280,000
$280,000
Right -of -Way
$0.45
$0.00
$225,000
$225,000
Utility Relocation
$0.45
$0.00
$225,000
$225,000
Professional Fees
$0.40
$0.00
$200,000
$200,000
Total Project Cost
$4.10
$2.20
$930,000
$930,000
ATTACHMENT:
A. Site Map
CITY OF OWASSO
P.O. 180
Owasso, OK 74055
918.272.4959
www.cityofowasso.com
E 116th STREET N
AND N 129th E AVE
INTERSECTION
LOCATION MAP
5/21A4
E
orlh-cooxw-t out Limits.
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Owasso
FROM:
Juliann M. Stevens
Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT:
Firework Displays within the Corporate Limits
DATE:
June 6, 2014
BACKGROUND:
Section 10 -304 of the Owasso Code of Ordinances prohibits the discharge of fireworks within the
city limits. An exception is noted in the Ordinance that allows the City Council to approve a
public display of fireworks within the city limits in celebration of Independence Day. There are
specific requirements associated with this exception and are summarized below:
• The group organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must obtain Council approval
for the event;
• The event must be open to the public, free of charge;
• The use, display, firing, ignition, lighting and discharge of the fireworks must be done in
the presence of an authorized representative of the Fire Department; and
• The group(s) organizing the event and igniting the fireworks must indemnify and hold the
city harmless for any damage caused by the event and provide an insurance policy,
with the city named as an insured, covering and protecting the city from liability to the
extent it is not immune by state law.
REQUEST FOR ACTION:
Other than the city's annual firework display, staff anticipates one additional request for a public
firework display in Stone Canyon. Once the details are finalized and Ordinance requirements
have been met, staff will include a request for Council consideration and appropriate action
relating to the approval of both firework displays on either the June 17th or July l :t agenda.