Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982.06.21_Planning Commission MinutesSPECIAL MEETING OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, June 21, 1982, 1:00 p,m, Owasso City Hall. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT' STAFF PRESENT R- Sadler P. Larkin M. Day M. Hinkle G. Dickey G. Phillips 1. Vice Chairman, R. Sadler called the meeting to order at 1:03 p.m, 2. of was called and a quorum was declared present. 3. M. Day moved to approve the minutes of the meetings of May 20 and June 17, 1982. P. Larkin seconded the motion Aye: Sadler, Larkin and Day. Nay: None, Motion carried 3•0-0, LOT SPLIT REVIEW 4, OLS-32 Terry Davis Staff presented the case bisLory and the staff evaluation: The TAC members had no objections to this lot split. It may, however, require an additional easement for extension of sewer lines. Both low would front the acc ess road to H, 169, Commissioners discussed the application with Bob Green who represented the owner. Staff related that no additional easements for sewer were required, M. Day moved to approve the lot split, P. Larkin seconded the motion. Aye: Day, Larkin and Sadler, Nay: None, Motion caried 3-0-0. EASEMENT VACATION REVIEW 5, Vacation of Utility Easement - L. Levy for D. Williams Staff reviewed the case history stating the request involved eliminating the 207 Perimeter easement located within and along the north property line of Lot 1, Block 1, Owasso Business Park, Louis Levy, representing Dale Williams, explained the request saying he had sold Mr. Williams the north 40 feet of Lot I in exchange for a part of the east end of Mr. Williams' lot needed as street right-of-way for Dogwood Avenue, Mr. Williams was requesting the easement removal so the additional space would be usable. Commissioners discussed the lot, locations of existing and proposed utilities and the requirement for a lot split on Lot I to clear ritle for the 40 foot strip, M. Day moved to approve vacation of the 20' easement of that portion of the northern boundary of Lot I that lies between the two easements that are located along the east and west lot lines of the lot and contingent upon the applicant obtaining a lot split for the property. P. Larkin seconded the motion, Aye: Day, Larkin and Sadler, Nay: None Motion carried 3-0-0. ZONING REFERRAL REVIEW 6. TCZ-54 Bob Miller, Staff explained the case history and presented the staff evaluation: This is a reapplication for IL zoning of part of the tract in application TCZ-45 reviewed by the Owasso Planning Commission in March, 1982. The minutes of that meeting and of the TMAPC meeting are attached. The ap--- plication was not approved by the County Commiss ion ,, Mr, Miller has reapplied for that portion of the tract that received an approval and recommendation from the TMAPC. The County Commissioners indicated they would be more inclined to approve rezoning on a smaller tract, Mr. Miller spoke in support of the application explaining that he planned. to develop the property as two lots with septic systems. He would be happy to keep the 13 acres surrounding the subject tract as a greenbelt and develop it in the future to complement future plans and better utilities. Commissioners discussed the amended application with Mr. Miller and staff. P. Larkin moved to recommend to the TMAPC approval of the application as resubmitted. M. Day seconded the motion. Aye. Larkin, Day and Sadler,, Nay: None. Motion carried 3-0-0. SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW 7, Oklahoma Baptist Retirement Center - Preliminary Plat Staff presented the case history and the technical advisory committee's requirements for the plat: 1. Identify the plat name of the Lot 2, Block I at the NE/c of the plat. 2, See, 33 2.3.5 and 3,2,3,6 - Fill out the location map with the names of the surrounding subdivisions and unplatted areas (with owners names). Show these also on the plat itself, 3. Provide written legal description corresponding to We survey boundaries. 4 See, 3,2,10 - Rename streets according to the County system per the Building Inspector's direction, 5, Outline in a beavier line the outer boundaries of the plat under consideration, 6. See, 3 2.3,13 - Provide a Corporation Commission letter, 7. See, 3.2.3.18 - Provide restrictive covenants. 8 See. 3.2 ,4 - Provide at least two sets of construction plans,, 90 Add the number of acres on the plat, 10. If streets are to be private, show connecting utility easements across the streets for extension of utility lines, 11. Widen utility easement along the south line of Lot 2, Block 3, from 5' to 10'. 12, Delete t 10' uil a m ity eseent running through the interior of Lot 6, Block 2. Retain the perimeter easements. 13. Provide an overall street plan for the City Engineer. 14. Delete the amended lot line on the south of Lot 3, Block U 15. Decide on deleting the utility easement on both sides of the south line of Lot 3, Block I through vacation. (Dedicated through earlier lots,) 16, Decide on an amended street alignment for Ingram Blvd. and realign. and construction plans accordingly. Commissioners discussed the TAC requirements, proposed street alignments and future use of the remainder of the applicant's property, The applicant presented a site plan detailing the proposed group quarters buildings and explaining their proposed development, The applicant agreed to complete all TAC requirements, P. Larkin moved to approve the preliminary plat contingent upon completion of all TAC requirements. M. Day seconded the motion. Ale: Larkin, Day and Sadler, Nay: None. Motion carried 3-0-0, INFORMATION ITEMS 8. CH & I Indistrial Parl< Commissioners reviewed the industrial plat sent on referral by TMAPQ located NE of 66th St, N. and H. 169. No action was taken on this item. 9. Buildirny Permit Review Commissioners reviewed four building permits of recent developments W, OWasso. No action was taken on these items. There being no further business to consider, R. Sadler moved to adjourn, P. Larkin seconded the motion, Aye: Sadler, Larkin and Day, Nay: None. Motion carried 3-0-0. The meeting was adjourned at 1:48 p.m,, Date Approved AI" EST Secretary