Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983.07.21_Planning Commission MinutesOWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, July 21, 1983, 4 :00 peiir6 Owasso City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT RA Larkin Mm Finkle M. flay R. Sadler G. Phillips 1e Vice- Chairman G. Phillips called the meeting to order 2. Roll was called and a quorum was declared present. 3. M. Day moved approval of the Minutes of the June 16, written, P. Larkin seconded the motion, Aye: Phillips, flay and Larkin. Nay: None, Motion carried 3om0-0. ZONING PUBLIC HEARING 4. TCZ-87 Referral STAFF PRESENT Co Dickey at 7o40 px. 1983 meeting as Staff reviewed the case history and the staff evaluation: The applicant requests `:P e C'z(, ?ning of a 29 acre dear C ! from AG to Pii'H for use as a mobile d1(1me s ubdlvisi°n The vacant parcel is located north of 66th St. North just, west; ia"P. 145th East Avenue, There is one home located to the west of the parcel. Vacant agri- cultural land lies .in all directions from th`e_'. parcel. Gravel and mining operations are located to the east on 66th St. North which carries heavy truck traffic to and from the industrial site aloi3g 66th Street North. 145th East Avenue toes not go through north of o"f 66th St. North. The arterial streets "r.;s near the subject property are two- 1arced asphalt streets in Fair to poor condition, The Comprehensive Plan re(:o111iT endsl this area as rural reside- ntial-agricultural dc`3nd Gigs. SrJCle fi`etf(?1t)[. }!"E1ent sensitive land is shown at the north end of the parcel. Mobile home development is listed .in the Owasso plan as a high intensity use; therefore, the application would not be in accord with the Ct?mpi'fa41er1sive Plan, Commissioners should also take into account the surrounding land uses and the potential effects a mobile home development would have an presents aY"4C.d future surrounding land uses and their potential e -, fects on a mobile home development. Tom Birmingham, attorney for the applicant, explained the project and presented an aerial and a site plan of the proposed subdivision. He said per„c tests had been run on the property, that there would be <a minimum size established in the covenants or mobile homes allowed in the subdivision, and that the Owasso School Superintendent had sent a letter s"t"a"t"ing the proposal complied with his standards. The letter is attached to these minutes Jerry Cole, president of the Owasso Home Owners Association, spoke in opposition to the application stating there was a court suit pending on the 40 acre tract zoned RMH located vest of the subject tract. He stated that the proposed rezoning Mould devalue nearby single family properties and create more traffic than 66 Street North could bear, especially with a one -lane bridge. He questioned the pert test results and stated his opposition to mobile home development in the area. Jahn Oxley, owner of land to the south of the subject tract stated his opposition to the application saying he planned to develop single family homes on his property and the proposed mobile hones would devalue the property for single family homes. He said he had protested a similar case in Rogers county that was defeated. Mr. Cole interjected that an appraiser of his property told him a mobile home develoment would de- value his property by $8500. Mrs. Shaffer, a nearby resident, questioned the availability of adequate water from the rural water district through 4" mains. Commissioners asked questions about the effects o.f the nearby quarry on existing homes in .terms of shaking, foundation cracks from blasting, noise and dust. Mr. Birmingham stated, in rebuttal, that he had received no negative remarks from the water district, stressed how far away the proposed development would be from other Igo €nets and said builders had told him the site wasn't suited for single family homes, He said residents would be owners of the property and that by doubling the size of the lots, to r.`cre,' mobile homes would be use by right. . Commissioners discussed the proposal further with all participants. M. tray moved to recommend denial of the application. P. Larkin in >econded ti`Ee ino t i o n !dye: Day, Larkin and Phillips, Nay: tone. Motion carried 3...0..0. SITE PLAN REVIEW 5. MIKCO Site Plan `3tcrl`I' reviewed the case history and the AC t`vvc)p €.$aI;3on,,, I Provide a minimum of 88 parking spaces for l:t`ti``e buildings, 2. Locate:': trash containers on concrete pads. s. Make the drives along the north and east sides .fire .Imes and post "no parking" signs. 4. Complete stormwaErer drainage improvements to city specifi- cations. I 5. Erect an opaque screening fence between the CS and reside- ntial property. e Locate a 5' gate in the screening fence on the east which would be clue west of the hydrant located in the mobile home park. The gate would be used to help fight fire in the southeast parts of the commercial buildings, is Fork out appropriate addresses with the building inspector. 8. Construct a de- acceleration lane for the driveway from Garnett into the lots. Rex Hall and Mike Losh, applicants, discussed the site plan and the TAC evaluation with commissioners. Staff stated that all parities had agreed to the first seven TAC items© The applicants questioned item 8, calling attention to the existing de- acceleration lane into 113th Street north. Commissioners discussed the proposed lane cosh length and building standards, P. Larkin moved approval of the site plan subject to completion of the first seven TAC requirements and an amendment of the eighth requirement to .leave building of a de-acceleration lane to the discretion of the city manager. M. pay seconded the motion Aye Larkin, Day a nd Phillips. Na.Et; None Motion carried -0 -0, SUBDIVISION REVIEW 6 :, E.,l Rio Vista IV Staff reviewed the flyC ev a.l a tti on The TAC had the following comments concerning the approval of the preliminary plat of El Rio Vista I& € i Submit an accurate gal descri ption, 2„ Complete the location map 3. `.dhoti surrounding subd 4v is c,C:9n`. and identify t6np lat:ted land, 4. Show any areas subject to flooding,, m Nam streets per building inspector's standards. 6. Add utility easements per utility companies' specifications. 7. Submit restrictive covenants for review, €3. Realign street stub on east to coincide with unplatted 99th Street forth to the east of the subject area. V Add another street stub can the west border to connect with land to the vest Bill Lewis, applicants engineer explained the plat design and discussed items 3 and 9 with they commission. M. tray moved approval of they preli- minary plat subject to completion of the TAC evaluation items® fie Harkin seconded they motion. Aye: Da , Markin and Phillips. Nay: pones. Motion carr=ied 3 -0-0B 7. Ramshead Staff reviewed the TAC evaluation: The TAC had the following comments regarding approval of the preliminary conditional final plat, of the pamshead PUD subdivision (p't D-6) e The final site Man for the development has not yet been approved by the planning commission. .. Specify they number of guest parking spaces on the face of they plat, Correct street names. 41r Show width of the private streets. 4, Renumber blocks to show a block at each street separation,, 5 Submit and have sp p"o le d construction ) I rn s for improvements,, 6s Show minimum 18' front yard building setback/utility ease-- metnts. 7. Label private streets as utility easement also. fl, t(��ak^e„g3 minor �sr�t�s�c�s �.c> restrictive covenants per utility companies' specifications. 9 Street lights will be privately maintained by the homeowners as sac i at.ion.. 10. to restrictive covenants p €age'. , paragraph D, change he third subparagraph to indicate that maintenance of drainage ,as.11ihle' will be the responsibility e:if the developer or homeowners assoc i..:.. at ion and not the city 1 In the restrictive covenants s pt'ge 4, paragraph A. (fie) , rename Hreserve areas" to specify the recreational use and expand the paragraph to indicate the larger open area in the center of the development will he developed for recreational use. a2® Complete the location map. 4 Bill Lewis, engineer for the applicant explained the plat and asked for leeway on the 18& building setback line noted in item C for certain lots, He agreed that the other items on the TAC list had been agreed to Commissioners discussed at length the building setback lines and how they would affect certain lots. Pm parkin moved to approve the preliminary /conditional final plat subject to completion of the TAG recommendations, amending #6 to allow a minimum 1e5' building line on lots tg and 20, block 3. M. Day seconded the motion Aye: Larkin, Day and Phillips, Nay: None. Motion carried 3 --0-0 BUILDING COLPL= RL_V:p W f Building Standards for the Handicapped Wayne Vincent and fury Caroline Cole presented a letter, attached to these minutes, requesting Planning Commission support of their proposal to adopt an ordinance adding the American (National `standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI) standards for construction of public improvements and household structures to the BOCA building code. In the letter they also proposed curb cuts at all street corners and making all public, buildings accessible to the handicapped and elderly. Commissioners discussed the ANSI standards arcls anal the other proposals with them. Mr. V.si,3cena:, clarified his proposals by stating that he wished to have the ANSI. standards used on those apartment units required by federal law or the BOCA code to be built to accommodate the handicapped. He also proposed that when a single family home is to be constructed For the handicapped rare. elderly, the ANSI standards should be used. Gi Phillips moved to recommend to the City Council that the Council 1 give consideration leration to approval of an CiY'd]i` €an,_.e to add the ANSI stand- ards to the BOCA building code as a guide for specifications for construction of facilities accessible to the handicapped and the elder- ly. a M. Day seconded the motion,, Aye: Phillips, Day and Larkin,, in;, Nto yz None Motion carried 3-0-0. 1(1plING Cill)fl_ R Vl:LW 9 Owasso lon.i!` q Code Staff gave the commission an update on the zoning coda review and suggested, because the TAC was still submitting comments and Chairman Hinkle was absent, that consideration of the code be continued to the August meeting. Commissioners agreed, saying they wanted more time to review the code, There was no action taken on this item. I INFORMATION ITEMS 10. Buildinq Permit Review. There were no building permits to review. There being no further business to consider, Pm Larkin moved to adjourn the meeting Zvii;h M. Day seconding the motion, Aye: Larkin, Day and Phillips, Nay: None. Motion carried 3 -0-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9955 pax. ecretar y I Date Approved airman