Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 03_OPWA_Distribution of Offering Document Refunding Serier 1988 Bonds_1997.12.16 97-03 A RESOLUTION PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE AUTHORITY'S REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1997 (THE Ii BONDS " ) FOR THE PURPOSE OF REFUNDING THE AUTHORITY'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1988; APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT PERTAINING TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS AND DEEMING SAID PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT "NEAR FINAL" AND AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF THE SAME; DESIGNATING AN UNDERWRITER WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AND CONTAINING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING THERETO. RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The Owasso Public Works Authority (the "Authority") has determined to advance refund the Authority's Public Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1988 (the "Refunding"); and WHEREAS, the Authority has determined to finance a portion of the cost of the Refunding through the issuance of the Authority's Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1997, in the approximate principal amount of $4,445,000 (the "Bonds") IT RESOLVED BY THE TRUSTEES OF THE OWASSO NOW, THEREFORE, BE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY: t SECTION 1. PRELIMINARY AUTHORIZATION REGARDING ISSUANCE OF BONDS. The Authority preliminarily authorizes the issuance of the Bonds in the approximate principal amount and for the purposes set forth above SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT. The Preliminary Official Statement dated December 16, 1997 (the "preliminary Official Statementll) outlining the terms, conditions and security for the Bonds, is hereby adopted and approved and the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of the Authority is authorized to approve any corrections, additions or deletions thereto for and on behalf of the Authority and is further authorized and directed to execute and deliver same for and on behalf of the Authority; provided further, that the information contained in said Preliminary Official Statement with respect to the Authority is correct in all material respects and such information does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact and does not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made in such Preliminary Official Statement, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The Authority hereby deems the Preliminary Official Statement "near final" in accordance with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Authority designates Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., to act as the underwriter of the referenced Bonds (the "Underwriter") . The Authority authorizes the Underwriter to distribute the Preliminary Official Statement in connection with the sale of the Bonds '" APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1997, by The Owasso Public Works Authority. THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY ~ ..J. - M (SEAL) ATTEST V~. ~dJt ell, ec ary TO FORM: Attorney t 2 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY ACTION I, the -undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Secretary of The Owasso Public Works Authority. I further certify that the Trustees of The Owasso Public Works Authority held a Regular Meeting at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on December 16, 1997, after due notice was given in full compliance with the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act. I further certify that attached hereto is a full and complete copy of a Resolution that was passed and approved by said Trustees at said meeting as the same appears in the official records of my office and that said Resolution is currently in effect and has not been repealed or amended as of this date. I further certify that below is listed those Trustees present and absent at said meeting; those making and seconding the motion that said Resolution be passed and approved, and those voting for and against such motion: t PRESENT: Mary Lou Barnhouse, Chairperson; Tracy Standridge, Vice Chairperson; Michael Helm, Trustee; Denise Bode, Trustee; Mark Wilken, Trustee ABSENT: None MOTION MADE BY: Wilken MOTION SECONDED BY: Bode AYE: Wilken, Bode, Helm, Standridge, Barnhouse NAY: None WITNESS MY HAND THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY l ), r 3 MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE CHAm & TRUSTEES OW ASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY TO RODNEY J RAY CITY MANAGER FROM: REFUNDING OF SERIES 1988 OUTSTANDING BONDS OPW A RESOLUTION #97-3 SUBJECT 1997 12 December DATE: BACKGROUND A review of the 1988 Bond Issue and the existing debt service on those bonds, has indicated that it is the best interest of the city to refinance the outstanding debt created by that series of bonds. That decision was reached after an extensive review of the debt by Keith McDonald and Allan Brooks (the city's financial advisor and bond counsel) and Ms Bishop/ and) two City Council work sessions that included discussion of this matter. The result of such a refinancing, using an option that is agreeable to all parties is an approximate savings of $391,000. That is a substantial savings to the taxpayer and will result in additional capital projects. the the Resolution #97-3 (attached) is a resolution that allows the city's representatives to initiate refunding by declaring the official statement "near final", thus giving the underwriter authority to begin preliminary placement of the bonds RECOMMENDA TION #97-3 There are two "blanks" in the attached resolution. Those pieces of information will be available prior to the City Council meeting, but until negotiations with the underwriter are complete, the information cannot be added. If you have questions please call Ms Bishop or me of OPW A Resolution Trustee approval staff recommends NOTE The 1997 11 ATTACHMENTS Resolution #97-3 Memorandum dated December 1 2 MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF OW ASSO TO RODNEY J RAY, CITY MANAGER SHERRY BISHOP, FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: REFUNDING BOND 1997 INFORMATION RELATING TO SUBJECT: 1997 11 December DA TE: BACKGROUND Pursuant to your request, the City's Financial Advisor (Keith McDonald of Leo Oppenheim & Co) and Bond Counsel (Allan Brooks of the Fagin Brown Law Firm) have supplied information relating the proposed refunding bond issue. The information has been updated with the most current estimates for interest rates and costs. One result of these changes is to reduce the total amount of bonds to be issued by $75,000. These documents anticipate a total of $4,445.000 in bonds. with an average interest rate of 4.65 % financing options discussed during last week s would be taken by the City and what Advisor and his staff have created an on the cost of money to compare the includes models for the three session Those options focused on how a savings the comparative savings of each option is. The Financial additional document on each option that uses a 10% cap' savings for all options in three methods The information work Cash four years first the for the payments option reduces three financing options are Front Loaded Savings. This savings is realized up front The 1 savmgs Cash term of the debt the payments over Level Savings. This option reduces all is realized evenly over the ten years. 2 Back Loaded Savings. This option maintains the payments at the current level and pays off the debt as soon as possible. Cash savings is realized in years eight through ten 3 term of the debt the are over payments the value of the savings cash total the This method uses methods for comparing Flow three Cash The 1997 REFUNDING BOND DECEMBER 11 1997 PAGE 2 interest rate of the debt Arbitrage Rate of Present Value This method uses the average as the rate to calculate the present value of the savings to calculate of money the cost 10 % as method uses Rate of Present Value This the present value of the savings 10% and each financing option each the city for to net savings Listed below are the estimated of the cost of money 10% Rate Present Value Arbitrage Rate Present Value assumption Cash Flow Savings Savings Savings tion: o Financin $262.892 $387.226 $520,990 Loaded Front 1 765 131 293 391 889 721 Level 2 -33.935 The back loaded option provides the greatest cash flow savings but, when analyzed with a potential 1 0 % cost of money, could actually be a loss in value. The front loaded option provides the greatest savings potential should the cost of money be at the 10 % level, but the least cash flow savings. The level financing option provides a savings under all three valuation methods and is nearly equal to option #1 using the arbitrage rate of present value. The financing option provides a good savings on the refunding and offers the least risk term savmgs the long level over 425.348 047.639 1 Back Loaded 3 FEES I have discussed/negotiated with the three firms (Oppenheim Fagin Cates) relative to the fees they would propose for the two projects. Based on those discussions, it is my opinion that the firms are willing to accept the discounted rates shown in the right column below Discounted Rate/Both Issue 1998 Issue 1997 $45.000 $30,000 $25.000 Cates $145.000 $112.000 $56,000 Leo Oppenheim 110.000 65.000 50.000 Fagin Brown $300,000 '" 207.000 $338,000 000 $131 TOTAL 1997 REFUNDING BOND DECEMBER 11 1997 PAGE 3 the following fees $45,000 $150,000 $90,000 $285,000 was to acquire Cates Oppenheim Fagin My goal NOTE Target Total negotiations resulted in the following fees $45,000 $145,000 $110.000 $300,000 Cates Oppenheim Fagin NOTE: The Negotiated Total of savmgs estimates, the negotiations have resulted in a net financial advisor fees and bond counsel fees. cost counsel fees the original local COMMENTS Based on $38,000 in * has was net (above) with five underwriters and cost/discount He also of a fee the underwriters three fees Keith McDonald has completed preliminary negotiations initially selected Rauscher, etal as the firm with the lowest successful in including the underwriters counsel cost as a part savings of $5000 those $53.000 for at was set savmgs target The * * Mr McDonald has renegotiated the underwriters fees/discounts down from 1 the bond. with their fee including the underwriters counseL a % of Additionally, 1.25 % of total to savings of $12.050 * Fagin-Brown firm (bond counsel) lowered their fee only $5000, but strongly commented that their initial quote of $50,000 + $65,000 was already discounted from a normal combined fee of $140,000 (based on one percent of the bond). Allan Brooks felt that he had quoted a fair fee for the work involved and believed the $5000 discount represented a good faith effort * less are approximately $55,000 '" and discussions savings due to negotiations estimate of fees amount the original Total than * 1997 REFUNDING BOND DECEMBER 11 1997 PAGE 4 of the Three Options Each Value Reports for Present & Net ATTACHMENTS Sources & Uses of Funds Cost of Issuance Information Debt Service Savings Reports C:\WPDA T A \PROJECTS\BOND1997 .REF 1 2 3