HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.08.09_OEDA AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: August 9, 2012
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: Owasso City Hall, Lower Level Conference Room
111 N. Main
Owasso, Oklahoma
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 7, 2012.
Chelsea M.E. Harkins Econ mic Development Director
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
Mr. Charney, Chairman
2. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Trustee approval of the
Consent Agenda. All matters listed under "Consent" are considered by the Trustees to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Trustee may, however, remove an item
from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non -
debatable.
A. Approval of minutes of the July 12, 2012 Regular Meeting.
Attachment
B. Approval of claims.
Attachment
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report.
Attachment
3. Discussion of proposed amendments to the Planned Unit Development section of the
Owasso Zoning Code.
Mr. Fritschen
Attachment
4. Discussion related to area sales tax comparisons.
Ms. Harkins
Attachment
OEDA
August 9, 2012
Page 2
7. Report from Economic Development Director
• Monthly Building Report
• Public Works Project Status Report
• Business Development Report
Ms. Harkins
Attachment
8. Report from OEDA Manager
*Update on the Owasso Strong Neighborhood Initiative
Mr. Ray
9. Report from OEDA Trustees
10. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen
at the time of posting of the agenda.)
11. Adjournment
MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF MEETING
Thursday, July 12, 2012
The Owasso Economic Development Authority met in regular session on Thursday, July 12, 2012 in
the Lower Level Conference Room at City Hall per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda
posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 5:00 PM on Tuesday, June 10, 2012.
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Vice Chairman Enzbrenner called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM.
PRESENT
Frank Enzbrenner, Vice Chairman
Gary Akin, Trustee
Bryan Spriggs, Trustee
David Charney, Trustee
Dirk Thomas, Trustee
A quorum was declared present.
ABSENT
Dee Sokolosky, Chairman
ITEM 2: ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN
Mr. Enzbrenner moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas, to nominate David Charney as
Chairman.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 3: ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRMAN
Mr. Thomas moved, seconded by Mr. Spriggs, to nominate Frank Enzbrenner as Vice
Chairman.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 4: ELECTION OF SECRETARY
Mr. Enzbrenner moved, seconded by Mr. Spriggs, to nominate Gary Akin as
Secretary.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
July 12, 2012
ITEM 5: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR TRUSTEE
APPROVAL OF THE OEDA CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of minutes of the June 14, 2012 Regular Meeting
B. Approval of claims
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report
Mr. Akin moved to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Dr. Thomas.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 450.
ITEM 6: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A RECOMMENDATION BY
THE OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO THE OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TO ENTER INTO A ONE -YEAR CONTRACT WITH RETAIL ATTRACTIONS
Ms. Harkins presented the item and discussion was held. Mr. Enzbrenner moved to
recommend approval of a contract between the City of Owasso and Retail
Attractions to the Owasso City Council, seconded by Dr. Thomas.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 7: REPORT FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Ms. Harkins introduced Roger Stevens and Karl Fritschen to provide a monthly status
report of the Public Works and Community Development departments. Ms. Harkins
provided information related to various economic development activities, as well as
an update on the activities of the Tulsa's Future II.
ITEM 8: REPORT FROM OEDA MANAGER
Mr. Ray provided a status update
infrastructure improvements to the
congressional activity related to the
funding for HWY 169.
ITEM 9: REPORT FROM OEDA TRUSTEES
None.
ITEM 10: NEW BUSINESS
None.
on regional discussions related to proposed
Tulsa Airport. Also discussed was the recent
Transportation Reauthorization Act, to include
-2-
ITEM 11: ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Enzbrenner moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Dr. Spriggs.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Enzbrenner, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 5 -0.
At 11:40 AM, the meeting adjourned.
-3-
July 12, 2012
Juliann Stevens, Minute Clerk
IM
The City Witt out Limits.
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CLAIMS, OEDA
DATE: August 9, 2012
No Claims for July 2012.
Owasso Economic Development Authority
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets
For the Month Ending July 31, 2012
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Materials & supplies
Services & other charges
Capital outlay
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
Non - Operating Revenues (Expenses):
Investment income
Promissory note revenue
RAN debt service & other costs
Total non - operating revenues (expenses)
Net income (loss) before contributions and
transfers
Transfer to general fund
Change in net assets
Total net assets - beginning
Total net assets - ending
MTD
YTD
Budget
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
(5,000.00)
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.69
0.00
0.69
0.69
(5,000.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.69
(5,000.00)
9,046.36
9,046.36
$9,047.05
$4,046.36_
IM
The Cittyr Witt out Limitts.
TO: The Honorable Chair and Trustees
Owasso Economic Development Authority
FROM: Karl Fritschen
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment
Chapter 8, Planned Unit Developments and Overlay Districts
DATE: August 9, 2012
BACKGROUND:
The Quality of Life Initiative Final Report that was adopted by the City Council in April 2011
included guidelines for the future development of Owasso. One area where citizens expressed
interest during the public workshops and through the on -line Wikiplanning survey was ensuring
that our neighborhoods were safe, attractive, sustainable, and livable. Subsequent to receiving
these comments, staff renewed its review of the Zoning Code in greater detail to determine
where improvements could be made that follow the principals of the Quality of Life Initiative.
The PUD (Planned Unit Development) process is the preferred vehicle of choice for developers of
single family subdivisions in Owasso. Nearly all new subdivisions being platted are using the PUD
process. The main reason for this is the flexibility allowed in lot size dimension. The RS -2 and RS -3
by -right zoning districts restrict the lot widths to 75 feet and 65 feet respectively, however the
market has changed in the past ten years, with both home and lot sizes seeing reductions in size.
The most common request for lot widths with new PUD applications is 50 feet, which is 15 feet less
than what the RS -3 zoning district allows. Flexibility is the key principal used in the PUD process.
A PUD is essentially negotiated zoning and as such the developer is asking for relief to the
underlying by -right zoning restrictions. What most cities, including Owasso have done, is to allow
this flexibility in exchange for additional amenities or open space as part of the development.
While this has worked to some degree in Owasso, there have been some inconsistencies in terms
of the amenities being provided and usable areas of open space. Additionally, staff has
encountered several PUD's that were approved over 5 years ago that were never activated,
primarily due the slowdown in the economy. The current ordinance is ambiguous with respect
to what constitutes an amenity, useable open space, what happens to an expired PUD and
what determines if it is expired or not. Additionally, the ordinance is silent on what the minimum
requirements are for a PUD submission and exactly how much density is allowed and how it is
measured. Owasso has had great success through the use and implementation of PUD's and
these proposed changes would only strengthen the PUD process.
REASON FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGE:
Considering the aforementioned information, staff developed a completely new draft for the
PUD section in Chapter 8 of the zoning code. The proposed amendments to Chapter 8 of the
Zoning Code are more comprehensive, include diagrams and pictures, and establish a level
and predictable playing field for all applicants choosing to use the PUD method for develop,
while at the same time ensure sustainable quality development. Furthermore, the amendments
will help ensure a higher quality standard and consistency throughout the entire community,
which maintains and increases property values.
SUMMARY OF IMPROVMENTS
Attached is a summary of the improvements of the proposed text amendment to Chapter 8, of
the Zoning Code.
TIMELINE
This item is being presented to the OEDA for information and dialogue and will be brought back
to the Authority in August 2012.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Summary of Improvements
2. Proposed Chapter 8, Planned Unit Developments and Overlay Districts
Highlights of PUD Chapter Changes
• Open Space
Old Code: Simply states that open space "must be an essential element of the Plan ".
New Code: Requires that projects have 20% open space (excluding rights of way and utility
easements) as a percentage of the gross acreage and that 25% of this area be developed and
maintained for active or passive recreation.
• Expiration
Old Code: Somewhat ambiguous. Parts of the code imply it is valid only for three (3) years if no
building permit has been issued, while others areas state that a PUD expires in 2 (two) years if
no final development plan has been submitted and seems to mix language between final
development plan and a plat. The code makes no reference as to what construes a final
development plan. There is also some language that alludes to a contract that guarantees
completion of any single phase within five (5) years, or the project can be revoked by the
Planning Commission.
New Code: Clearly states that if any portion of the project or if a building permit is issued within
five (5) years after approval by the City Council, the project is validated. If none of these items
occur, then the project is considered expired and must be re- approved. There is also a clearly
outlined process for asking for an extension, whereas the current code provides no guidance in
this area.
• Amenities
Old Code: Some amenities are required based upon the density proposed.
New Code: The new code builds upon the old code, but clarifies the amenities required based
on the type of development and density. A table is provided that allows the designer to
customize their amenity package based on the density proposed. There is also more emphasis
on providing amenities for residential development. At least four (4) types of amenities are
required for any PUD, and if a neighborhood proposes a higher density than 4 units per acre,
one additional amenity from any category shall be required for each 0.5 units per acre over 4.
• Major and Minor Amendments
Old Code: These are outlined in the existing code.
New Code: These will be similar to the existing code, but with a clearly defined process and
description of what construes and a major and minor amendment.
• Minimum Requirements for Conceptual Development Plans
Old Code: Required, but somewhat unclear as to what should be included in the conceptual
development plan. Most developers provide the necessary documentation, but there are some
areas that are a vague in terms of what is actually required.
New Code: Ensures that correct and uniform information is provided that will assist the
decision - making bodies in reviewing the project. The plans will also work with the design intent
statement to fully articulate what the development will look like.
• Design Intent Statement
Old Code: Not required
New Code: Adds more specificity as to what are the minimum requirements. The design intent
statement is an important document because it is a part of the PUD approval. It outlines the
plan, the design, covenants, timeline, and other important aspects of the project.
• Neighborhood Meeting
Old Code: Not required
New Code: A neighborhood meeting would be required prior to the item being heard by the
Planning Commission. This is a great opportunity for the developer to present the item to
surrounding property owners, gain input, listen to concerns, and possibly make changes that
would benefit both parties. It also helps the developer with gaining approval at the Planning
Commission and City Council, because they can say they worked with the neighbors and listened
to their concerns.
CHAPTER 8
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
8.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a special zoning overlay that provides
alternatives to conventional land development. Upon approval, it becomes a
supplement to the existing zoning of the subject property. A PUD is also a
means of encouraging creative development of land and promotes project
design that is often unseen in conventional development. A PUD shall not be
seen as a tool to circumvent the zoning and subdivisions regulations of the City
of Owasso, but rather as a tool for intelligent, well - planned, and quality
developments that fit within Owasso's existing neighborhoods and context of
the surrounding area. A PUD provides flexibility to allow for the development
on properties with unique physical characteristics by promoting innovative
design and providing guidelines which ensure that development is beneficial to
the City of Owasso's future growth. While great flexibility is given to provide
special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted,
procedures are established herein to ensure against misuse of the increased
flexibility.
8.2 GOALS
Because PUD's allow greater flexibly than otherwise would be allowed with the
base zoning, there are specific goals that need to be accomplished with each
application. All PUD's shall be evaluated on their ability to accomplish the
following:
1. Maintain and Enhance the Quality of Life in Owasso
2. Provide Opportunities for Urban Infill
3. Maintain and Promote a Sense of Community
4. Encourage Development That Otherwise Could Not Occur on the Site
5. Preserve and Provide Meaningful Open Space
6. Promote Connectivity and Compatibility with Surrounding Development
7. Inspire Unique and Thoughtful Development
8. Support the Development of Strong Neighborhoods
9. Provide Amenities Beyond Conventional Development
10. Preserve the Physical Characteristics of the Land
8.3 APPLICABILITY
1. A PUD may be submitted for any parcel of land located within any general
zoning district or combination of general zoning districts within the Owasso
City Limits. In all cases, the PUD will be reviewed as to the proposed
location and character of the uses and the unified treatment of the
development of the tract. The regulations of the general zoning district or
districts remain applicable except as specifically modified pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter.
2. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan is required prior to
development of a PUD district. Comprehensive Development Plans are
subject to recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by
the City Council.
3. This PUD chapter shall complement the other sections of the Owasso
Zoning Code. In instances where the requirements are conflicting, the
Community Development Administrator shall determine the correct action.
4. A Conceptual Development Plan shall be submitted concurrently with a
request for rezoning.
8.4 MINIMUM STANDARDS
A. DENSITY
By their very nature, PUD's are designed to develop parcels of land with
unique or unusual, natural or man -made conditions. In order to promote
development that makes use of and preserves such unique features, it may
be necessary to cluster density within developments. If clustering of
density is proposed, additional amenities shall be provided; the design shall
promote and maintain useable open space; and a layout shall be provided
that complements the existing conditions of the site.
All PUD's shall calculate density based upon the gross area of the tract,
which may include flood plains, rights of way, or easements to provide an
overall gross density for the project that shall be expressed in units per
acre. The gross density calculations shall be provided within the PUD
Design and Intent Statement.
1. Single - Family Residential Densities - A residential PUD shall not
exceed a gross density above five (5) dwelling units per acre for single -
family residential developments. Should a development propose a density
higher than five (5) units per acre, written justification shall be provided
explaining the rationale of the decision and additional amenities shall be
provided to mitigate the increased densities.
2. Multi - Family Residential Densities - Multi - family densities shall be
consistent with Chapter 4 of the Owasso Zoning Code. All multi - family
residential developments shall be accomplished through a PUD.
B. LAND USE PERCENTAGES
In any residential PUD, at least 20% of the gross area of the tract shall be
devoted to open space, common areas or amenities. Rights -of -way and
utility easements shall not apply to open space calculations.
C. PRESERVATION OF TREES AND OTHER NATURAL FEATURES
PUD's shall be designed to preserve and enhance the existing physical
characteristics of the land and the natural vegetation that exists on the
land. Projects that require clear cutting or denuding of large tracts of
land for development are discouraged. Trees in excess of eight (8) inches
in caliper shall be preserved and worked into the overall design of the
project, unless the applicant can provide substantial justification to
remove said trees. Tree preservation credits shall be applied to all
landscaping plans and additional landscaping shall be required for projects
that remove excessive healthy vegetation.
D. SCREENING AND BUFFERING
Screening is an important part of any PUD proposal, especially when
incompatible uses are proposed within the PUD, or exist in adjoining
developments. Screening may be employed in the form of:
1. Fencing - Natural materials are encouraged;
2. Walls - Stone, brick, split -faced block, or decorative materials shall be
used.
3. Berms - Berms may be used in combination with vegetation or fencing to
achieve the desired result.
4. Vegetation - Vegetation provides a screening mechanism that can be
efficient and aesthetically pleasing. In many cases, leaving the natural
vegetation as a means of screening achieves the desired results.
5. New vegetation may be planted that also achieves the intent of this
section. Materials and sizes of vegetation shall be provided with the
required Conceptual Development Plan and conform to Chapter 20 of
the Zoning Code.
Buffer yards shall be provided at all boundaries of the PUD where higher
intensity or higher density uses adjoin existing tracts that are of a lower
intensity or density. An example of this may be 5000 SF lots adjoining an
existing single family development containing 20,000 SF lots. Buffers shall
vary in size depending on the use or the density of the development, but in
shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width. Vegetation and screening is
required in buffer yards.
E. TRANSITION OF USES
Great care shall be given as to the location of the more intense uses or
densities within the PUD. Transition shall be achieved when possible by
placing less intense uses along the perimeter of the PUD area with more
intense uses near the center of the PUD. For example, if a PUD is proposed
in an area that abuts mostly acreage lots, the PUD should place larger lots
meeting RE or RS -1 standards along the perimeter and move towards
smaller lots within the core of the PUD area or along arterial streets. If
transition cannot be achieved, a large and well - vegetated buffer should be
provided.
F. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED
Each PUD shall require a landscape concept plan at the time of submittal.
The landscape plan shall depict general locations for landscaping, but shall
not be required to go into great detail on the conceptual plan. Trees,
however, shall be shown on the conceptual landscape plan. More detailed
landscape plans may be required in the later stages of the development
process in conformance with the City's adopted landscape requirements, or
if the Administrator or Planning Commission deems it necessary during at
the conceptual landscape phase.
G. ADHERENCE TO CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
All adopted landscape requirements shall be met by any PUD. A PUD shall
provide landscaping that exceeds the City's minimum requirements in order
to meet the goals, purpose, and criteria outlined in the PUD ordinance.
H. SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Low - Impact Design (LID) Criteria
All PUD proposals are encouraged to incorporate LID techniques.
Utilizing LID techniques can greatly reduce infrastructure costs and can
be incorporated into common areas and open space. Some LID design
possibilities are: Bio- retention areas (rain gardens), Green roofs,
Permeable paving or driveways, Cisterns, Vegetated Swales, and
Impervious Surface Reduction. All PUD's are encouraged to define how
LID principles shall be applied.
2. Grading and Site Disturbance
PUD sites shall not be denuded of all vegetation. Great care should be
given to developing drainage and grading plans that incorporate natural
areas and preserve the topography and vegetation of the PUD area. All
creeks or perennial streams shall have a minimum of a 20 foot
undisturbed buffer measured from the top of the stream or creek bank
and shall be included into the design of the PUD whenever possible.
3. Adherence to City, State, and Federal Requirements
All grading and drainage plans shall meet all City, State and Federal
requirements.
I. PARKING AND CIRCULATION
The developer shall provide plans that depict the safe and efficient
movement of vehicles throughout the PUD. For any PUD that proposes
more than two - hundred (200) residential units, a traffic study shall be
provided to the City of Owasso for review. All Federal, State, and City
regulations shall be met by the PUD proposal. All parking areas, driveways
or other means of vehicular access shall be designed in accordance with
Chapter 9 of the Owasso Zoning Code.
J. OPEN SPACE
At least 25% of the provided open space shall be developed and maintained
for active or passive recreational activities. The remainder should be kept
as marshland, wildlife areas, woodlands, creeks, etc. At least 10% of the
above reference area shall be out of the floodplain (100 Year), floodway..
K. COMMON AREAS
Common areas shall be provided throughout the development for the use
and enjoyment of the residents of the surrounding area. Common areas
promote social interaction and help to create a sense of community.
L. AMENITIES REQUIRED
Any residential PUD development shall provide at least one (1) amenity
from each of the categories from the Table 8 -1.
1) For any residential development that proposes a gross density of more
than four (4) units per acre, one an additional amenity from any
category shall be required for each 0.5 units per acre over 4.
2) A developer may propose any amenity not provided on the list and an
explanation of what category it should fall under. The Community
Development Administrator, the Planning Commission, or the City
Council shall determine if an amenity is acceptable.
3) Amenities may be combined into one or more park /recreation areas.
(i.e. pool with a club house or a park area with a basketball court,
playground, and walking trails).
4) Park and recreation areas shall be placed in a centralized location
within the development so it is convenient and accessible.
5) Any standing water feature or pond shall be re- circulated through a
fountain, waterfall, or other aeration device. This requirement applies
to any storm retention pond that is maintains a pool elevation of water.
TABLE 8 -1, REQUIRED AMENITIES
CATEGORY
AMENITY FEATURE
SPORTS FIELDS, TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS,
ACTIVE RECREATION
VOLLEYBALL COURT, DISC GOLF COURSE, SKATE FACILITIES,
BIKE PATHS, HIKING TRAILS
FISHING POND, NATURE PRESERVE AREAS OF AT LEAST 2
ACRES, HORSE SHOE PIT, WILDLIFE VIEWING AREA (IF
PASSIVE RECREATION
ADJACENT TO PRESERVED HABITAT), CAMP GROUNDS,
EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES, MEDITATION AREA, WALKING PATHS
OR TRAILS
DOG PARKS, PICNIC AREAS, PAVILLIONS, OUTDOOR
PUBLIC GATHERING AREAS
AMPHITHEATRE, CLUBHOUSE, GAZEBO, BBQ AREA, DOCK
AREAS, COMMUNITY GARDEN, PARK AREA
FAMILY RECREATIONAL AREAS
TOT LOT, SPLASH PAD, SWIMMING POOL, PLAYGROUND
M. CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE PLAN
Any proposed PUD shall be developed in accordance with the adopted
Owasso Land Use Master Plan. The PUD shall meet the Goals, Objectives
and Action Strategies stated within the plan.
N. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
Each PUD shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the
surrounding development in the area. If the proposed development is not
in character with the surrounding area, the PUD shall show how the
development can be screened or employs techniques that will mitigate the
incompatibility.
8.5 PROCEDURE
A. PRE - APPLICATION MEETING
A pre- application meeting is required prior to submitting a formal
application for the proposed PUD project. This step offers the developer a
chance to meet with City staff to discuss ideas related to the development
of a PUD on a piece of property. City staff from different departments
shall be available to discuss the project, answer questions and provide
information to the developer.
B. SUBMITTAL OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
1. After submittal of a completed PUD application packet with all required
information, the Administrator shall provide a professional review of the
project and shall assist the developer in understanding the PUD process.
2. The Administrator shall require sufficient detail in the Conceptual
Development Plan to provide an opportunity for the reviewing bodies to
make informed decisions and evaluate compliance with the applicable
approval criteria.
3. The Administrator shall provide recommendations regarding changes or
additions to the PUD that would make the project more consistent with
the goals, purpose and standards of the PUD outlined in this chapter.
Upon completion of a successful application, the PUD shall be placed on
the next available Planning Commission Agenda.
C. TECHNICAL ADVIOSRY COMMITTEE (TAC)
1. Prior to the Planning Commission, the City of Owasso's Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) shall review the PUD proposal and all supporting
documentation.
2. The TAC shall provide comments to the developer regarding utilities,
engineering, planning, and project design.
3. All TAC comments shall be addressed by the developer prior to the PUD
being reviewed by the Planning Commission or City Council.
D. REQUIRED PUBLIC MEETING
At least seven (7) calendar days prior to the project being heard by the
Planning Commission, the applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting to
introduce the project to neighboring property owners and receive input
about potential issues with the development. The applicant shall provide
written notice about the meeting to all property owners within three
hundred (300) feet of the subject property. The meeting shall give the
developer an opportunity to address potential issues, answer development -
related questions, and bring forward a project that is consistent with the
surrounding development of the area. City Staff will be present to answer
procedural and City- related questions, but will otherwise observe and
report on the discussions held at the meeting.
E. PLANNING COMMISSION
It shall be the duty of the Planning Commission to review each PUD prior to
consideration of the City Council.
1. The Planning Commission shall perform detailed analysis of the project
and make recommendations to the applicant and the City Council.
2. The Planning Commission shall receive staff's input, hear from the
general public, and engage the developer in discussion of the project.
3. The Planning Commission shall address any potential issues that they feel
the project has and suggest design alternatives to create a project that
meets the goals, purpose, and criteria identified in this chapter.
4. The Planning Commission shall make one of the following
recommendations to the City Council.
a) Move to recommend denial of the application
b) Move to recommend approval of the application as presented
c) Move to recommend approval of the application with conditions
5. Should the Planning Commission need more information, the item can be
tabled until the next meeting or until information requested is provided.
6. No proposal may continue to the City Council until the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council.
7. If any major changes are made to the plans or new information is brought
forward after review by the Planning Commission, the City Council may
ask that the project return to the Planning Commission for review.
F. CITY COUNCIL
The City Council shall make the final decision on any PUD application. A
final PUD plan shall be approved along with an Ordinance. The approved
ordinance and PUD development plan shall dictate any future development
on the subject property, unless the PUD is amended or the PUD is allowed
to expire.
The City Council shall use the information provided by City staff, the
recommendation from the Planning Commission, and the input from the
public and the project developer to approve or deny and proposed PUD.
1. The City Council may add conditions to the project that they feel are
necessary to meet the intent of the PUD Ordinance.
2. Should the City Council require more information; the item can be tabled
to a future meeting.
3. All conditions imposed by the Council shall become binding and shall be
met before the project may proceed.
PUD PROCESS FLOW CHART
8.6 TIMELINE AND EXPIRATION
A. VALIDATION
A PUD shall be validated once any portion of the property has been platted and
recorded or a building permit is approved.
B. ZONING ORDINANCE
Because a PUD is a zoning action approved through City Council by Ordinance,
the City shall file the ordinance approving the designation of a PUD on a tract
of land, with the County Clerk's Office upon platting and recording any portion
of the PUD.
C. EXPIRATION
For any PUD in which there has been no building permit issued nor any portion
of the property platted after five (5) years since approval by the City Council,
the PUD shall be considered null and void and shall be brought back before the
Planning Commission and City Council for re- approval prior to any development
on the property. Upon approval of the PUD by the City Council, the
Administrator shall transmit in writing the date by which the PUD will expire.
Commentary: PUD's are approved with underlying zoning. The underlining
zoning of the site shall not expire, only the PUD overlay shall expire.
D. EXTENSIONS
An extension may be granted by the Administrator for PUD's that are nearing
the 5 year expiration date. PUD's may be extended one (1) time for a maximum
of two (2) additional years, provided a letter is submitted to the Administrator
asking for the extension no less than two (2) months prior to the five (5) year
expiration date. Said letter must indicate the following:
1. Reason for the extension
2. That there are no changes to the original PUD approved by the City
Council.
3. Expected date by which a portion of the PUD will be platted
It shall be the developing party's responsibly to ask for and sign the letter of
extension. If no extension has been sought and granted, said PUD shall be
considered expired and must be re- approved by the Planning Commission and
City Council following the process prescribed in this Chapter. If no portion of
the property has been platted nor any building permit received by the
Community Development Department, within the two (2) year extension
period, said PUD shall expire and a new PUD application must be submitted.
8.7 AMENDMENTS
There may be instances when a change or amendment to the original PUD is
necessary or desired. In these situations, the magnitude of these amendments
is considered. There are two types of amendments that can occur with a valid
PUD, a major amendment and a minor amendment.
A. MAJOR AMENDMENT
A major amendment is described as a significant change that increases the
density, intensifies the use, or creates inconsistencies with the character of the
PUD that was initially approved shall proceed through the entire PUD process as
outlined in this chapter.
1. The Administrator shall determine if the changes to the PUD meet the
criteria for a major amendment, is an appropriate change, and will
maintain the spirit of what was approved in the original PUD.
2. An appeal from the Administrators decision that the changes to the PUD
construe a major amendment shall be made in writing by filing a notice of
appeal to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the
Administrators decision. Said appeal shall be heard a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission, at which time the applicant defend his
proposal. Appeals shall not require public notification.
Small changes that meet the intent of the ordinance, do not increase the
density, are consistent with surrounding development, and do not pose a threat
to the health, safety, or welfare of the City of Owasso can be administratively
approved as a Minor Amendment. Minor amendments may also include
relocation of landscape areas, parking areas, drive aisles, or other similar
changes that are minor in scope.
1. Minor amendments shall be approved administratively and may only be
required to go before the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC).
8.8 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
The required conceptual plan shall be a rendered plan that clearly articulates
the overall concept of the PUD. Figure 8.1 illustrates an acceptable conceptual
site plan rendering. The site plan shall include the entire PUD area, and may
include site plans of smaller areas to provide more specificity if the
development is large.
1. The site plan shall include, at a minimum, the following:
a) Name of the proposed development.
b) Name and address of the property owner and developer.
c) Name of the preparer of the document.
d) Graphic scale drawn at a scale no smaller than 1:100, a north arrow,
date of preparation, and a legend. Vicinity map outlining the
location of the development in relation to major streets within 1000
feet, schools, and other landmarks. The County where the
development lies shall be depicted.
e) Legal description of the property shall be provided. Total acreage
of the tract, total acreage of the proposed area to be improved, and
acreage of open space. Location and name of abutting subdivisions
and City Limit Lines.
f) Wooded areas, wetlands, waterways, floodplain and floodway,
ponds and other natural features shall be depicted.
g) Location of all proposed streets.
h) Location of each proposed building (single- family residences or
duplexes not required)
i) Proposed density of the development depicted in gross density
figures (gross units per acre of the entire development)
j) Location and identification of all land uses within the PUD shall be
depicted. Identification of all amenity locations, detention areas,
open space areas, etc shall be clearly depicted.
k) Location of parking areas.
l) Depiction of any proposed walking trails, pathways, and buffer
yards, including fences.
m) Notation on the plan of how wide the buffer yards will be and how
they will be landscaped
n) Location and type of amenities provided
Figure 8.7 -1
B. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
Should a conceptual site plan be provided that goes into sufficient detail
necessary for submittal of a preliminary plat, the plan may be used as the
preliminary plat for the PUD project. If the site plan is to be used as the
preliminary plat, it must contain all of the required elements for preliminary
plat approval outlined in the subdivision regulations of the City of Owasso. If
the PUD is approved with a site plan that is sufficient to be used as a
preliminary plat, the applicant may proceed to the final plat stage.
Commentary: It is not required that the entire development be platted,
only the portion the applicant intends to develop initially.
8.9 DESIGN AND INTENT STATMENT
A. REQUIREMENTS
The design and intent statement shall clearly articulate the vision for the
proposed development and shall identify key elements of the project that
justify using a PUD approach over conventional zoning.
1. At a minimum, the design and intent statement shall include some basic
elements, listed below.
a. Overall project statement of proposed use and intent.
b. List of the proposed land uses including residential densities
c. List of all parties involved (applicant, owner, agent, plan preparer)
d. Thorough narrative explaining why the development is appropriate,
how it complies with the PUD ordinance. The applicant should
explain how the PUD is consistent with the goals, purposes, and
standards listed in this chapter.
e. A statement regarding the compatibility of the proposed
development with the surrounding area. The statement should
address buffer zones, transition, screening, types of materials to be
used, square footage of structures, .
f. A table showing how the proposed PUD will differ from current bulk
standards, with an outline of what sections of the zoning ordinance
or subdivision regulations that the PUD seeks relief from.
g. An outline of the covenants that will govern the property and
information about the development of a Homeowners Association
and how they will govern the common areas.
h. An anticipated timeline for development, which may include a
phasing plan.
i. The PUD's consistency with the Owasso Land Use Master Plan.
Sections 8.90 -8.99 Reserved
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT JULY 2012
Month
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1 January
54
30
31
22
13
25
15
17
18
19
2 F . briic :: ::::::::::::41::::::::::::::::5
e.......... fy .......................................
..................................................................................
.::::
R.......................................................................................................................................
:::::::62_::::::::::::::4:1::::
::::::::::::14::::::::::::::::1
R::::::::23::
::::::::::::29::::::::::::1
...............................
x:5:::
...............................
.
..................................................................................
3 March
38
75
65
50
25
35
...............................
30
46
14
27
..................................................................................
4 April:
35
47
63
................:..........:.
52
30 .
3i
...............................
36
31
19
26
5 May
29
31
43
36
60
23
..........
27
30
.............:.....
20
23
..................................................................................
6 June :: .:
33 ::
53
42
29
27.:
::21
...............................
34
2 ........
.:.:.:20.:.:.:...:.:.:j:5.:.:.:
7:.:.:..
.
...............
.............................................
t :::::::::::::::::::::1
8 t�ut�s ....................
..................................................................................
... ..........................................................
3..................
36...............................
4 :::::::::::::::
...........
2...::........
.. ... ......
27::..::........
........
l:::::::::::::::::
8...............
...... ...............................
.........
28........::....
...............................
....I.. .........
1. 9....::
.............
. ...... . 12::.....
..... .::....::
..................................................................................
9 September
52
64
35
12
17
40
...............................
20
11
12
..................................................................................
10 :cto :�r :: ::::::::::::48:::::::::::::::42
0.... F� ...............................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
:30: ;;;:::::::::25:::::::::::::::31
::::;::::15_::
::::::::::..6:::::::::;:::::1:3
.......3.......................
...............................
...............................
...............................
::
::::10:;.:;:;::.:;;:;:;;;:;.;:;
......
....
..................................................................................
11 November
35
31
32
13
26
10
...............................
13
1
8
12 �crr b:eY
S1.:
35
53
16
8 .....
..................
...............................
13
9
10
Totals
479
528
518
336
301
267
303
246
179
149
YTD 262 320 323 242 192 178 193 193 127 149
JULY YEAR -TO -DATE COUNT
JULY YEAR -TO -DATE DOLLARS
35,000,r ^^
30,000,1
25,000,1
20,000,1
15,000,(
10,000,(
5,000,(
TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
CITY OF OWASSO
RESIDENTIAL LOT INVENTORY STATUS
July 31, 2012
SUBDIVISION
# OF LOTS
# DEVELOPED
# AVAILABLE
Burberry Place (6/09)
89
49
40
Camelot Estates (4/07)
139
51
88
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
171
54
117
Champions East (05/08)
66
6
60
Champions West (5/08)
45
2
43
Country Estates III (3/99)
61
58
3
Country Estates VI (11/03)
37
36
1
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
101
93
8
Fairways V (8/99)
71
57
14
Fairways VI (12/00)
42
40
2
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
85
84
1
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
24
22
2
Honey Creek (4/02)
202
198
4
Keys Landing (3/08)
131
96
35
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
114
81
33
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
235
187
48
Maple Glen (12/08)
98
95
3
Maple Glen II (1/11)
93
72
21
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
20
17
3
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
44
43
1
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
58
9
49
Preston Lakes (12/00)
272
243
29
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
147
144
3
Remington Park II (11/04)
84
82
2
Sawgrass Park II (04/05)
96
94
2
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
31
26
5
Watercolours (12/02)
40
31
9
TOTALS
2596
1970
626
Watercolours (12/02)
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
Sawgrass Park II (04/05)
Remington Park II (11/04)
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
Preston Lakes (12/00)
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
Maple Glen II (1/11)
Maple Glen (12/08)
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
Keys Landing (3/08)
Honey Creek (4/02)
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
Fairways VI (12/00)
Fairways V (8/99)
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
Country Estates VI (11/03)
Country Estates III (3/99)
Champions West (5/08)
Champions East (05/08)
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
Camelot Estates (4/07)
Burberry Place (6/09)
CITY OF OWASSO
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
OLots Developed OTotal Lots
COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT JULY 2012
Month
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1 January
0
0
1
2
9
4
4
1
1
3
1
2
.
..........................
j
3 March
3
1
2-
1
14
2
0
1
3
0
0
...........................................................................................
4.: rElllalalaIlalallalllllllll3
....Pr ..................................................
....
::::::::4
::::::::::::::::1::1
...............................
.......
1 ;11111�;i4ii
..............................................
...............................
11
...............................
:::1 ::::::0:1:::::
.............
5 May .... _....._
....
4
........
1
......
1
..........
3
2_ ...
....... .
1
2
1
2
1
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
6 June-
...........................................................................................
:2:::::::::::::::4:::1:::1'
1A :::::
::1:::
. 1 ::::::::2::::::::
...............................
...............................
...............................
0:::::::::D:::::::2::::
7July
1
0_
_0
_0 -
__00
1
0
_ 0
0
0
...........................................................................................
..............
8 August;l; .........;1...2
...............................
......
........3... ; ...........:3;
...:.::::.
....
,..T.... ,.::
......
..7 ............................
..........
3:. ::....1.:::......:0:......:::0.
...............................
...............................
0 ...........
.
2
...
9 September
2
2
1
2
1
28
3
0
0
0
...........................................................................................
............
101Qc1oke ......1
...............................
. 8 ...1....0..:11.:.:::'3.
.......
.........
...............................
..................
...............................
11 November
1
1
3
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
12 Oecerriber
..........................................................................................................................................
...........
...............................
.
1 .
C1 :::::.
1:' ::::::::
...............................
.. .............
Q ............
. .
Totals
23
12
23
23
43
48
20
9
10
11
5
YTD
10
6
16
18
30
11
13
7
7
7
5
JULYYEAR -TO -DATE COUNT
35
30 _
25
20
15
10
5 _
0 2002 2003 I 2004 2005 _ 2006 I 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
ULY 10 6 16 18 30 11 13 7 7 7 5
PERMITS APPLIED FOR IN JULY 2012
ADDRESS
BUILDER
ADD /ZONE
VALUE
A.S.F.
PERMIT #
DATE
9402 E 92 St N
Terry Davis
LBR/RS3
$ 146,685
2667
12- 0701 -X
7/2/2012
9935 N Owasso Exp
A -Max
TD /CS
$ 55,888
87
12- 0702 -5
7/2/2012
8300 N 74 E Ave
Kolt Systems
CARPI /RS3
$ 127,820
2324
12- 0703 -X
7/5/2012
11001 N 118 E Ave
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 100,815
1833
12- 0704 -X
7/9/2012
10905 N 118 E Ave
Simmons Homes
MGII/RS3
$ 100,815
1833
12- 0705 -X
7/9/2012
13134 E 79 Ct N
Fiesta Pools
CM /RS3
$ 5,000
706
12- 0706 -P
7/9/2012
9411 N 96 E PI
Executive Homes
LBR/RS3
$ 155,000
2801
12- 0707 -X
7/17/2012
9205 E 94 St N
Executive Homes
LBR/RS3
$ 186,000
3222
12- 0708 -X
7/19/2012
9509 E 91 St N
Executive Homes
LBR/RS3
$ 145,000
2819
12- 0709 -X
7/19/2012
10901 N 117 E PI
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 92,340
1939
12- 0710 -X
7/19/2012
9209 N 143 E Ave
Rausch Coleman
CE /RS3
$ 90,000
2467
12- 0711 -X
7/19/2012
9118 N 137 E Ave
Pool Creations
NH /RS2
$ 25,000
652
12- 0712 -P
7/20/2012
109 W 1 Ave
Mike Mayopoubs
OT /CH
$ 400
32
12- 0713 -S
7/23/2012
12500 E 86 St N
Owasso Land Trust
86R/CH
$ 85,125
1135
12- 0714 -C
7/23/2012
403 W 2 Ave
Stay Green
BL /IL
$ 30,000
2100
12- 0715 -C
7/23/2012
7571,7575,7574,7583 N 132 E Ave
Sooner Traditions
Stonebdge/PUD
$ 440,000
6348
12- 0716 -X
7/23/2012
12505 E 84 St N
Poolscapes
EC /RS3
$ 25,000
1080
12- 0717 -P
7/24/2012
11901 E 105 PIN
Simmons Homes
BBP /RS3
$ 120,240
2584
12- 0718 -X
7/25/2012
10553 N 121 E Ave
Simmons Homes
BBP /RS3
$ 120,240
2584
12- 0719 -X
7/31/2012
11008 N 118 E Ave
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 85,980
1833
12- 0720 -X
7/31/2012
10911 N 117 E PI
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 130,560
1832
12- 0721 -X
7/31/2012
10904 N 117 E PI
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 105,300
2155
12- 0722 -X
7/31/2012
8309 N 99 E Ave
Baker Pools I
SL /RS3
$ 65,000
1092
12- 0723 -P
7/31/2012
15 Single Family
$ 2,146,795
39,241 SgFt
2 Commercial Remodel
$ 115,125
3,235 SgFt
2 Signs
$ 56,288
119 SgFt
4 Pool
$ 120,000
3,530 SgFt
23 Building Permits
$ 2,438,208
46,125 SgFt
OCCUPANCY PERMITS
NAME ADDRESS APPLICATION OPENING COMPLETE
DATE DATE
JULY 2012
AT &T 7707 N Owasso Exp #7 7/1/2012 7/3/2012 Yes
Boyd Dentistry 8415 N 125 E Ave 11/15/2011 7/20/2012 Yes
JUNE 2012
The Copper Kiln 122 S Main St 6/1/2012 6/29/2012 Yes
MAY 2012
APRIL 2012
Luna De Noche
9500 N 129 E Ave #130
4/5/2012
4/12/2012
Golden Dragon Taekwondo
13720 E 86 St N
4/5/2012
4/9/2012
Blue Phoenix
9500 N 129 E Ave #
4/10/2012
4/26/2012
MARCH 2012
9200 N. Garnett
2/22/2012
2/22/2012
Duffy's
11610 E 86 St N
3/5/2012
3/10/2012
Life Church
14008 E 96 St N
5/2/2011
3/3/2012
Edward Jones
9540 N Garnett
1/22/2012
3/22/2012
Dayana's Hair Salon
11622 E 86 St N
3/2/2012
3/20/2012
Iglesia Pentecostal
12111 N Garnett
3/22/2012
3/22/2012
Idol Nails & Spa
12412 E 86 St N
3/14/2012
3/17/2012
FEBRUARY 2012
Pet Hotel
8355 N. Owasso Exp.
2/1/2012
2/3/2012
Green Hill Funeral Home
9901 N. Owasso Exp.
2/6/2012
2/16/2012
Akira Sushi Bar
9455 N Owasso Exp. #E
1/15/2012
2/10/2012
Family Animal Medicine
9200 N. Garnett
2/22/2012
2/22/2012
Owasso Medical Campus
12455 N. 100 E. Ave. #300
2/29/2012
2/29/2012
JANUARY 2012
DECEMBER 2011
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dog Daycare & Kennel 8355 N Owasso Expy 12/1/2011 12/1/2011 Yes
NOVEMBER 2011
Ma's Cafe 11691 N. Garnett Rd. 11,/14/2011 11/14/2011
Boomarang Diner 13720 E. 86 St. N. #190 11/16/2011 11/16/2011
Creative Clips 12711 E. 86 PI. N. #108 11/15/2011 11/30/2011
OCTOBER 2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts
Top Cut
SEPTEMBER 2011
Fire In The Hole
AUGUST 2011
Catholic Diocese Church
Panda Express
13318 E. 116th St. N.
12409 E. 96th E. Ave.
126 S. Main St.
1002 North Forest Drive
12403 E. 96th St. N.
10/31/2011 10/31/2011
10/31/2011 10/31/2011
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
9/1/2011
9/23/2011
Yes
8/8/2011
8/30/2011
Yes
1/3/2011
8/30/2011
Yes
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
City of Owasso Public Works Department
As of August 7, 2012
• E. 861 Street North Widening (from Main Street to N. Memorial Drive)
- Funding for the construction of this project is a result of a "matching grant "; 80%
ODOT funding and 20% City funding.
- ODOT awarded the contract to BECCO of Tulsa, Oklahoma in the amount of
$6.9 million.
- Public Meeting was held on March 15, 2012 @ 6:30 pm at the Bailey Ranch Golf
Course. 8 citizens attended, as well as representatives from ODOT, Tulsa County
and BECCO.
- Official construction time began April 2, 2012.
- Phase I Road Improvements - Memorial to Mingo - April 2, 2012 to August 1, 2012.
- Phase II Road Improvements - Mingo to Main Street - August 1, 2012 to
November 4, 2012.
- Significant progress continues on both the roadway and bridge construction
portions. The contractor has graded the west section of the project and is starting
to lay aggregate base. The new retaining wall on top of the hill (north side) is
approximately 50% complete. The piers on the bridge have been completed
and eye beams are being driven this week at the abutments.
- As a result of utility conflicts, the project is approximately 45 -days behind
schedule. Thus, Phase I Road improvements from Memorial to Mingo should be
complete in mid - September.
• E. 106TH Street North and Garnett Road Intersection Improvement Proiect
- A $750,000 grant from ODOT was approved February 2009.
- On March 24, 2009, Council awarded an engineering design contract to PSA
Dewberry.
- Utility relocations are complete.
- Urbanized funding application was submitted July 27, 2012. INCOG anticipates
scoring the applications by the end August /early September. If urbanized
funding is approved by the INCOG, bid advertisement is anticipated to begin in
November 2012.
• Santa Fe Lift Station and Force Main Improvements
- February 2010, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount
of $145,874 to Greely and Hansen Engineering.
- November 2011, OPWA Trustees awarded a construction contract to W.N.
Couch in the amount of $2,636,700. The project is scheduled to be complete in
August 2012.
- Construction crews have placed the final lift of concrete for the wet well structure
as of Monday, August 6t". This pour consisted of 100 yards of concrete and was
the most significant single pour to date on this project. Crews will now begin
working on the construction of the electrical room and pump equipment
installation. This project is slated for final completion in September.
• Three Lakes Stormwater Channel Improvements
- Project includes widening and shaping of the north /south channel east of US
Hwy 169, from to 83rd Street North southward to the end of the existing concrete
channel.
- The engineering design is being performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 90% complete.
- In April 2012, AT &T mobilized and completed the relocation of their utility.
- The USACE and ODEQ have accepted a proposal to add trees to Rayola Park
channel and to minimize tree disturbance along the Three Lakes channel by not
removing any necessary trees over 4- inches in caliper. Permit is being drafted
and sent to City of Owasso for the USACE Permit.
• East 106th Street North Water Improvements
- Project includes extending 12" water line from 106th Street North /N. 110th East
Avenue to 106th Street North and Mingo Road.
- The engineering design was performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 100% complete.
- Owasso Public Works water crews have installed over 400' of water line on this
project. Crews are working as diligently as possible while maintaining the
everyday water division issues such as leaks and new service connections.
• E. 76th Street North Widenina (from U.S. Hwvl 69 to N. 129th East Avenue
- In October 2010, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $2,090,000 for engineering, right -of -way
and utility relocation costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the
City of Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund. This phase of the project is targeted
for federal assistance in FY 2014 or sooner, depending on funding availability.
- In October 2011, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $3,470,000 for construction and
administration costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the City of
Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund. This phase of the project will be targeted
for federal assistance in FY 2015 or sooner, depending on funding availability.
- In February 2012, ODOT officials informed City staff of funds available in the
Federal Surface Transportation Fund for the planning phase of E. 76th Street North
Widening Project.
- In March, INCOG presented this project to its members for consideration to
receive funding in 2012 for the engineering design. Project was approved by the
Technical Advisory and Transportation Policy Committees.
- In April 2012, the recommendation was submitted to the INCOG Board of
Directors for consideration and approval. The project was approved by the
members.
- Engineering qualifications were received by ODOT in late July. We anticipate
interviews in August.
• FY201 1 -2012 Street Rehabilitation Project
- The City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $368,059 to
Tri -Star Construction during the March 20, 2012 meeting.
- Staff conducted a pre- construction meeting with the contractor in early May.
Construction began in mid -May with completion scheduled in August.
- This project will be completed in the first week of August. Staff intends to bring this
project to the second meeting in August for acceptance and authorization for
final payment. This project was completed within budget and on schedule.
Ranch Creek Sanitary Sewer Improvements
- May 2012, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount of
$175,000 to Kellogg Engineering INC.
- The design is approximately 10% complete with completion expected in June
2013.
- Staff is working with the Larkin Bailey Trust on gaining access to their property
adjacent to the railroad between 76th Street North and 86th Street North to
determine the feasibility of a potential alignment along the railroad property.
IM
The Cittyr Witt out Limitts.
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: DIRECTOR'S REPORT
DATE: August 9, 2012
RETAIL & SERVICE DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Groundbreaking ceremony was held for a second Taco Bueno location in the Garret
Creek Shopping Center on Monday, July 23, 2012.
Braums will begin construction soon on their Fresh Market store on 96th Street N near the
northeast corner of the Garnett intersection.
HEALTH CARE UPDATE
• Senior Suites, a full service nursing facility has begun construction on land to the south of
the St. John Owasso medical campus.
MISC. UPDATES
• The contract between the city and Retail Attractions will be discussed in the August City
Council work session and will go before them to vote on Tuesday, August 21St.