HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.09.13_OEDA AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: September 13, 2012
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: Owasso City Hall, Lower Level Conference Room
111 N. Main
Owasso, Oklahoma
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 11, 2012. •a
Chelsea M. . Harkins, Eco&Wmic velopment irector
AGENDA
Call to Order
Mr. Charney, Chairman
2. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Trustee approval of the
Consent Agenda. All matters listed under "Consent" are considered by the Trustees to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Trustee may, however, remove an item
from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non -
debatable.
A. Approval of minutes of the August 9, 2012 Regular Meeting.
Attachment
B. Approval of claims.
Attachment
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report.
Attachment
3. Discussion of proposed amendments to the Planned Unit Development section of the
Owasso Zoning Code.
Mr. Fritschen
Attachment
4. Report from Economic Development Director
• Monthly Building Report
• Public Works Project Status Report
• Business Development Report
Ms. Harkins
Attachment
OEDA
September 13, 2012
Page 2
5. Report from OEDA Manager
Mr. Ray
6. Report from OEDA Trustees
7. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen
at the time of posting of the agenda.)
8. Adjournment
MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF MEETING
Thursday, August 9, 2012
The Owasso Economic Development Authority met in regular session on Thursday, August 9, 2012
in the Lower Level Conference Room at City Hall per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda
posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 5:00 PM on Tuesday, August 7, 2012.
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Chairman Charney called the meeting to order at 10:04 AM.
PRESENT
David Charney, Chairman
Gary Akin, Secretary
Bryan Spriggs, Trustee
Dirk Thomas, Trustee
Dee Sokolosky, Trustee
Jeri Moberly, Trustee
A quorum was declared present.
ABSENT
Frank Enzbrenner, Vice Chairman
ITEM 2: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR TRUSTEE
APPROVAL OF THE OEDA CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of minutes of the July 12, 2012 Regular Meeting
B. Approval of claims
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report
Mr. Akin moved to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Dr. Thomas.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Moberly, Thomas
NAY: None
ABSTAIN: Sokolosky
Motion carried 5 -1.
ITEM 3: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SECTION OF THE OWASSO ZONING CODE
Mr. Fritschen presented proposed amendments to the Planned Unit Development
section of the Owasso Zoning Code. Discussion was held. Mr. Fritschen explained the
proposal would be placed on the September 2012 OEDA agenda for further
discussion.
ITEM 4: DISCUSSION RELATED TO AREA SALES TAX COMPARISONS
Ms. Harkins presented data comparing Owasso sales tax rate to Tulsa and Oklahoma
City communities and counties. Discussion was held.
ITEM 5: REPORT FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Ms. Harkins introduced Roger Stevens and Karl Fritschen to provide a monthly status
report of the Public Works and Community Development departments. Ms. Harkins
provided information related to various economic development activities.
August 9, 2012
ITEM 6: REPORT FROM OEDA MANAGER
Mr. Ray provided a status update on the Owasso Strong Neighborhood Initiative, the
proposed infrastructure improvements to the Tulsa Airport, the proposed utility rate
structure, and the opening of the Owasso CNG fueling station.
ITEM 7: REPORT FROM OEDA TRUSTEES
None.
ITEM 8: NEW BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 9: ADJOURNMENT
Dr. Thomas moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Dr. Spriggs.
AYE: Spriggs, Charney, Akin, Moberly, Thomas, Sokolosky
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 6 -0.
At 12:02 PM, the meeting adjourned.
Juliann Stevens, Minute Clerk
COO>
The City Wit out Limits.
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CLAIMS, OEDA
DATE: September 13, 2012
No Claims for August 2012.
Owasso Economic Development Authority
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets
For the Month Ending August 31, 2012
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Materials & supplies
Services & other charges
Capital outlay
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
Non - Operating Revenues (Expenses):
MTD
YTD
Budget
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
(5,000.00)
Investment income 0.70
Promissory note revenue 0.00
RAN debt service & other costs 0.00
Total non - operating revenues (expenses) 0.70
Net income (loss) before contributions and
transfers 0.70
Transfer to general fund
Change in net assets
Total net assets - beginning
Total net assets - ending
1 1I
0.70
1.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.39
0.00
1.39
(5,000.00)
0.00
0.00
1.39
(5,000.00)
9,046.36
9,046.36
$9,047.75
$4,046.36
K A 4 r
TO: The Honorable Chair and Trustees
Owasso Economic Development Authority
FROM: Karl Fritschen
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment
Chapter 8, Planned Unit Developments and Overlay Districts
DATE: September 10, 2012
BACKGROUND:
The Quality of Life Initiative Final Report that was adopted by the City Council in April 2011
included guidelines for the future development of Owasso. One area where citizens expressed
interest during the public workshops and through the on -line Wikiplanning survey was ensuring
that our neighborhoods were safe, attractive, sustainable, and livable. Subsequent to receiving
these comments, staff renewed its review of the Zoning Code in greater detail to determine
where improvements could be made that follow the principals of the Quality of Life Initiative.
The PUD (Planned Unit Development) process is the preferred vehicle of choice for developers of
single family subdivisions in Owasso. Nearly all new subdivisions being platted are using the PUD
process. The main reason for this is the flexibility allowed in lot size dimension. The RS -2 and RS -3
by -right zoning districts restrict the lot widths to 75 feet and 65 feet respectively, however the
market has changed in the past ten years, with both home and lot sizes seeing reductions in size.
The most common request for lot widths with new PUD applications is 50 feet, which is 15 feet less
than what the RS -3 zoning district allows. Flexibility is the key principal used in the PUD process.
A PUD is essentially negotiated zoning and as such the developer is asking for relief to the
underlying by -right zoning restrictions. What most cities, including Owasso have done, is to allow
this flexibility in exchange for additional amenities or open space as part of the development.
While this has worked to some degree in Owasso, there have been some inconsistencies in terms
of the amenities being provided and usable areas of open space. Additionally, staff has
encountered several PUD's that were approved over 5 years ago that were never activated,
primarily due the slowdown in the economy. The current ordinance is ambiguous with respect
to what constitutes an amenity, useable open space, what happens to an expired PUD and
what determines if it is expired or not. Additionally, the ordinance is silent on what the minimum
requirements are for a PUD submission and exactly how much density is allowed and how it is
measured. Owasso has had great success through the use and implementation of PUD's and
these proposed changes would only strengthen the PUD process.
REASON FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGE:
These changes are being considered to establish a level and predictable playing field for all
applicants choosing to use the PUD method for development, while at the same time ensuring
sustainable quality development. Furthermore, the amendments help ensure a higher quality
standard and consistency throughout the entire community, which maintains and increases
property values.
SUMMARY OF IMPROVMENTS
Attached is a summary of the improvements of the proposed text amendment to Chapter 8, of
the Zoning Code.
TIMELINE
As with the other text amendments staff has brought forth, the PUD Chapter will follow a
transparent process which seeks input from all interested stakeholders. Below is the anticipated
schedule for proceeding with the text amendment for Chapter 8 of the Zoning Code, Planned
Unit Developments and Overlay Districts.
• August 9 2012 - Present the proposed amendments to the Owasso Economic
Development Authority (OEDA)
• August 14, 2012 - Present the proposed amendments to the Owasso City Council at Work
Session
• August 15, 2012 - Place the proposed amendments on the City website and Face
book page
• August 15 through 31 - Meet individually with the Planning Commission members
• September 10, 2012 - Discussion item, Planning Commission Meeting
• September 11, 2012 - Second presentation and discussion with the Owasso City Council
at Work Session
• September 13, 2012 - Second presentation and discussion with the OEDA
• October 8, 2012 - Planning Commission - Action Item
• October 9, 2012 - Third presentation to the City County at Work Session
• October 16, 2012 - Public hearing at the City Council Meeting
• November 6 - City Council, Ordinance approval
INPUT REVCEIVED
Staff brought this item to the OEDA at the August 2012 meeting for discussion and input. The
PUD chapter has also been brought before the Planning Commission and City Council for initial
discussion and input. The proposed changes to the PUD chapter have also been posted to the
City website and linked to Facebook in order to receive citizen input on the proposed changes.
A summary of the feedback received has been attached for review.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Summary of Improvements
2. Proposed Chapter 8, Planned Unit Developments and Overlay Districts
3. Summary of Input Received
Hi ,qhIhzhts of PUD Chapter Chanties
• Open Space
Old Code: Simply states that open space "must be an essential element of the Plan ".
New Code: Requires that projects have 20% open space (excluding rights of way and utility
easements) as a percentage of the gross acreage and that 25% of this area be developed and
maintained for active or passive recreation.
• Expiration
Old Code: Somewhat ambiguous. Parts of the code imply it is valid only for three (3) years if no
building permit has been issued, while others areas state that a PUD expires in 2 (two) years if
no final development plan has been submitted and seems to mix language between final
development plan and a plat. The code makes no reference as to what construes a final
development plan. There is also some language that alludes to a contract that guarantees
completion of any single phase within five (5) years, or the project can be revoked by the
Planning Commission.
New Code: Clearly states that if any portion of the project or if a building permit is issued within
five (5) years after approval by the City Council, the project is validated. If none of these items
occur, then the project is considered expired and must be re- approved. There is also a clearly
outlined process for asking for an extension, whereas the current code provides no guidance in
this area.
• Amenities
Old Code: Some amenities are required based upon the density proposed.
New Code: The new code builds upon the old code, but clarifies the amenities required based
on the type of development and density. A table is provided that allows the designer to
customize their amenity package based on the density proposed. There is also more emphasis
on providing amenities for residential development. At least four (4) types of amenities are
required for any PUD, and if a neighborhood proposes a higher density than 4 units per acre,
one additional amenity from any category shall be required for each 0.5 units per acre over 4.
• Major and Minor Amendments
Old Code: These are outlined in the existing code.
New Code: These will be similar to the existing code, but with a clearly defined process and
description of what construes and a major and minor amendment.
• Minimum Requirements for Conceptual Development Plans
Old Code: Required, but somewhat unclear as to what should be included in the conceptual
development plan. Most developers provide the necessary documentation, but there are some
areas that are a vague in terms of what is actually required.
New Code: Ensures that correct and uniform information is provided that will assist the
decision - making bodies in reviewing the project. The plans will also work with the design intent
statement to fully articulate what the development will look like.
• Design Intent Statement
Old Code: Not required
New Code: Adds more specificity as to what are the minimum requirements. The design intent
statement is an important document because it is a part of the PUD approval. It outlines the
plan, the design, covenants, timeline, and other important aspects of the project.
• Neighborhood Meeting
Old Code: Not required
New Code: A neighborhood meeting would be required prior to the item being heard by the
Planning Commission. This is a great opportunity for the developer to present the item to
surrounding property owners, gain input, listen to concerns, and possibly make changes that
would benefit both parties. It also helps the developer with gaining approval at the Planning
Commission and City Council, because they can say they worked with the neighbors and listened
to their concerns.
CHAPTER 8
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
8.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a special zoning overlay that provides
alternatives to conventional land development. Upon approval, it becomes a
supplement to the existing zoning of the subject property. A PUD is also a
means of encouraging creative development of land and promotes project
design that is often unseen in conventional development. A PUD shall not be
seen as a tool to circumvent the zoning and subdivisions regulations of the City
of Owasso, but rather as a tool for intelligent; well- planned, and quality
developments that fit within Owasso's existing neighborhoods and context of
the surrounding area. A PUD provides flexibility to allow for the development
on properties with unique physical characteristics by promoting innovative
design and providing guidelines which ensure that development is beneficial to
the City of Owasso's future growth. While great -flexibility is given, to provide
special restrictions which will allow development not otherwise permitted,
procedures are established herein to ensure against misuse of the increased
flexibility.
8.2 GOALS
Because PUD's allow greater flexibly than otherwise would be allowed with the
base zoning, there are specific goals that need to be accomplished with each
application. Atl'PUD's shah be evaluated on their ability to accomplish the
following: y; .
1. Maintain and Enhance the Qualit" of Life in Owasso
2. Provide Opportunities for Urban Infill
3 Maintain and Promote a Sense of Community
4. Encourage Development "T`hat Otherwise Could Not Occur on the Site
5., Preserve and P,rovide�aAeaningful Open Space
6. Promote Connectivity and Compatibility with Surrounding Development
7. Inspire Unique "and Thoughtful Development
8. Support the Development of Strong Neighborhoods
9. Provide Amenities Beyond Conventional Development
10. Preserve.the Physical Characteristics of the Land
8.3 APPLICABILITY
A PUD may be submitted for any parcel of land located within any general
zoning district or combination of general zoning districts within the Owasso
City Limits. In all cases, the PUD will be reviewed as to the proposed
location and character of the uses and the unified treatment of the
development of the tract. The regulations of the general zoning district or
districts remain applicable except as specifically modified pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter.
2. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan is required prior to
development of a PUD district. Comprehensive Development Plans are
subject to recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by
the City Council.
3. This PUD chapter shall complement the other sections of the Owasso
Zoning Code. In instances where the requirements are conflicting, the
Community Development Administrator shall determine the correct action.
4. A Conceptual Development Plan shall be submitted concurrently with a
request for rezoning.
8.4 MINIMUM STANDARDS
A. DENSITY
By their very nature, PUD's are designed to develop parcels of land with
unique or unusual, natural or man -made; conditions. In order to promote
development that makes use of and preserves such unique features, it may
be necessary to cluster density, within developments. If clustering of
density is proposed, additional amenities shall be provided; the design shall
promote and maintain useable open space; and a layout shall be provided
that complements the existing;conditions of the site.
All PUD's shall calculate density %based upon the gross area of the tract,
which may include flood plains, rights of way, or easements to provide an
overall gross density for the project that shall be expressed in units per
acre.. The gross ,',density calculations shall be provided within the PUD
1, Single - Family „Residential; Densities - A residential PUD shall not
�'exceed a gross, density, above five (5) dwelling units per acre for single -
fatTuly residential developments. Should a development propose a density
higher than five t(5) units per acre, written justification shall be provided
explaining the,,,Tationale of the decision and additional amenities shall be
provided W itigate the increased densities.
% 2. Multi- Family Residential Densities - Multi - family densities shall be
consistent with Chapter 4 of the Owasso Zoning Code. All multi - family
residential developments shall be accomplished through a PUD.
B. LAND USE PERCENTAGES
In any residential PUD, at least 20% of the gross area of the tract shall be
devoted to open space, common areas or amenities. Rights -of -way and
utility easements shall not apply to open space calculations.
C. PRESERVATION OF TREES AND OTHER NATURAL FEATURES
PUD's shall be designed to preserve and enhance the existing physical
characteristics of the land and the natural vegetation that exists on the
Land. Projects that require clear cutting or denuding of large tracts of
land for development are discouraged. Trees in excess of eight (8) inches
in caliper shall be preserved and worked into the overall design of the
project, unless the applicant can provide substantial justification to
remove said trees. Tree preservation credits shall be applied to all
landscaping plans and additional landscaping shall be required for projects
that remove excessive healthy vegetation.
D. SCREENING AND BUFFERING
Screening is an important part of any PUD proposal, especially when
incompatible uses are proposed within the PUD, or exist in adjoining
developments. Screening may be employed in the form of:
1. Fencing - Natural materials are en(
2. Walls - Stone, brick, split -faced blc
used.
3. Berms - Berms may be used in com
achieve the desired result.
4. Vegetation - Vegetation provides a
efficient and aesthetically plea!
vegetation as a means of screer
5. New vegetation may be planted
section. Materials and sizes of
required, Conceptual Developm
the Zonine Code.
Buffer
or
intensity or den
existing single „f
vary in size dep
shall be a minin
reauired in buff
ragea;
or decorative materials shall be
ng. In main
ne achieves
ent P
vegetation or fencing to
mechanism that can be
f cases, leaving the natural
the,desired results.
»eves the intent of this
shall be provided with the
conform to Chapter 20 of
�e provided at all boundaries of the PUD where higher
'density usesadjoin existing tracts that are of a lower
An example of this may be 5000 SF lots adjoining an
iiy development containing 20,000 SF lots. Buffers shall
ling on the use or the density of the development, but in
n of 20 feet in width. Vegetation and screening is
yards.
E. TRANSITION OF
Great care shall be given as to the location of the more intense uses or
densities within the PUD. Transition shall be achieved when possible by
placing less intense uses along the perimeter of the PUD area with more
intense uses near the center of the PUD. For example, if a PUD is proposed
in an area that abuts mostly acreage lots, the PUD should place larger lots
meeting RE or RS -1 standards along the perimeter and move towards
smaller lots within the core of the PUD area or along arterial streets. If
transition cannot be achieved, a large and well - vegetated buffer should be
provided.
F. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED
Each PUD shall require a landscape concept plan at the time of submittal.
The landscape plan shall depict general locations for landscaping, but shall
not be required to go into great detail on the conceptual plan. Trees,
however, shall be shown on the conceptual landscape plan. More detailed
landscape plans may be required in the later stages of the development
process in conformance with the City's adopted landscape requirements, or
if the Administrator or Planning Commission deems it necessary during at
the conceptual landscape phase.
G. ADHERENCE TO CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
All adopted landscape requirements shall be met by any PUD. A PUD shall
provide landscaping that exceeds the City's minimum requirements in order
to meet the goals, purpose, and criteria outlined in the PUD ordinance.
H. SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Low - Impact Design (LID) Criteria
All PUD proposals are encouraged to incorporate LID techniques.
Utilizing LID techniques can greatly reduce infrastructure costs and can
be incorporated into common areas and open space. Some LID design
possibilities are: Bio- retention areas (rain gardens), Green roofs,
Permeable paving or driveways, Cisterns; Vegetated Swales, and
Impervious Surface Reduction. Ail PUD's are encouraged to define how
LID principles shall be applied.
2. Grading and Site Disturbance
PUD sites shall not be denuded of all vegetation. Great care should be
given to developing drainage and grading plans that incorporate natural
areas and;presei*e,the topography and vegetation of the PUD area. All
creeks or ',,per`tnniai streams'" shall have a minimum of a 20 foot
undisturbed buffer measured from the top of the stream or creek bank
and shalt be included into the design of the PUD whenever possible.
3. Adherence to CityState, and Federal Requirements
All grading and drainage plans shall meet all City, State and Federal
requirements.
I. PARKING =AND` CIRCULATION
The developer shall provide plans that depict the safe and efficient
movement of vehicles throughout the PUD. For any PUD that proposes
more than two - hundred (200) residential units, a traffic study shall be
provided to the City of Owasso for review. All Federal, State, and City
regulations shall be met by the PUD proposal. All parking areas, driveways
or other means of vehicular access shall be designed in accordance with
Chapter 9 of the Owasso Zoning Code.
J. OPEN SPACE
At least 25% of the provided open space shall be developed and maintained
for active or passive recreational activities. The remainder should be kept
as marshland, wildlife areas, woodlands, creeks, etc. At least 10% of the
above reference area shall be out of the floodplain (100 Year), floodway..
K. COMMON AREAS
Common areas shall be provided throughout the development for the use
and enjoyment of the residents of the surrounding area. Common areas
promote social interaction and help to create a sense of community.
L. AMENITIES REQUIRED
Any residential PUD development shall provide at least one (1) amenity
from each of the categories from the Table 8 -1.
1) For any residential development that proposes a gross density of more
than four (4) units per acre, one an additional amenity from any
category shall be required for each'0.5 units per acre over 4.
2) A developer may propose any amenity not provided on the list and an
explanation of what category it should fall under. The Community
Development Administrator, the Planning Commission, or the City
Council shall determine if an amenity is acceptable.
3) Amenities may be combined into one or more "park /recreation areas.
(i.e. pool with a club house or a park area' with a basketball court,
playground, and walking trails):
4) Park and recreation areas shall be placed in a centralized location
within the development so it is convenient and accessible.
5) Any standing water feature or pond shall be re- circulated through a
fountain, waterfall, or other aeration device. This requirement applies
to any storm retention pond that is maintains a pool elevation of water.
TABLE 8 -1, REQUIRED AMENITIES
CATEGORY
AMENITY FEATURE
SPORTS FIELDS, TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS,
ACTIVE RECREATION
VOLLEYBALL COURT, DISC GOLF COURSE, SKATE FACILITIES,
BIKE PATHS, HIKING TRAILS
FISHING POND, NATURE PRESERVE AREAS OF AT LEAST 2
ACRES, HORSE SHOE PIT, WILDLIFE VIEWING AREA (IF
PASSIVE RECREATION
ADJACENT TO PRESERVED HABITAT), CAMP GROUNDS,
EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES, MEDITATION AREA, WALKING PATHS
OR TRAILS
DOG PARKS, PICNIC AREAS, PAVILLIONS, OUTDOOR
PUBLIC GATHERING AREAS
AMPHITHEATRE, CLUBHOUSE, GAZEBO, BBQ AREA, DOCK
AREAS, COMMUNITY GARDEN, PARK AREA
FAMILY RECREATIONAL AREAS
TOT LOT, SPLASH PAD, SWIMMING POOL, PLAYGROUND
M. CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE FLAN r
Any proposed PUD` shall be developed in accordance with the adopted
Owasso Land Use `Master Flan. The PUD shall meet the Goals, Objectives
and Action 'Strategies stated within the plan.
N. COMPATIBILIsTY. WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
Each PUD shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the
surrounding development in the area. If the proposed development is not
in character With the surrounding area, the PUD shall show how the
development can be screened or employs techniques that will mitigate the
incompatibility.
8.5 PROCEDURE
A. PRE - APPLICATION MEETING
A pre- application meeting is required prior to submitting a formal
application for the proposed PUD project. This step offers the developer a
chance to meet with City staff to discuss ideas related to the development
of a PUD on a piece of property. City staff from different departments
shall be available to discuss the project, answer questions and provide
information to the developer.
B. SUBMITTAL OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
1. After submittal of a completed PUD application packet with all required
information, the Administrator shall provide a professional review of the
project and shall assist the developer in understanding the PUD process.
2. The Administrator shall require sufficient detail in the Conceptual
Development Plan to provide an opportunity for the reviewing bodies to
make informed decisions and evaluate compliance with the applicable
approval criteria.
3. The Administrator shall provide recommendations regarding changes or
additions to the PUD that would make the project more consistent with
the goals, purpose and standards of the PUD outlined in this chapter.
Upon completion of a successful application, the PUD shall be placed on
the next available Planning Commission Agenda.
C. TECHNICAL ADVIOSRY COMMITTEE (TAC)
1. Prior to the Planning Commission, the City of Owasso's Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) shall review the PUD; proposal and all supporting
documentation.
2. The TAC shall provide comments to the developer regarding utilities,
engineering, planning, and project design.
3. All TAC comments shall be addressed by the developer prior to the PUD
being reviewed by the Planning Commission or City Council.
D. REQUIRED PUBLICMEETING
,At least"seven (7) calendar days prior to the project being heard by the
Planning Commission; ,the applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting to
introduce the ,project to neighboring property owners and receive input
about potential issues ith the development. The applicant shall provide
written notice about the meeting to all property owners within three
hundred (300) ;feet of the subject property. The meeting shall give the
developer an opportunity to address potential issues, answer development -
related 'questions, and bring forward a project that is consistent with the
surrounding development of the area. City Staff will be present to answer
procedural and City- related questions, but will otherwise observe and
report on the discussions held at the meeting.
E. PLANNING COMMISSION
It shall be the duty of the Planning Commission to review each PUD prior to
consideration of the City Council.
1. The Planning Commission shall perform detailed analysis of the project
and make recommendations to the applicant and the City Council.
2. The Planning Commission shall receive staff's input, hear from the
general public, and engage the developer in discussion of the project.
3. The Planning Commission shall address any potential issues that they feel
the project has and suggest design alternatives to create a project that
meets the goals, purpose, and criteria identified in this chapter.
4. The Planning Commission shall make one of the following
recommendations to the City Council.
a) Move to recommend denial of the application
b) Move to recommend approval of the application as presented
c) Move to recommend approval of the,app ication with conditions
5. Should the Planning Commission need more information, the item can be
tabled until the next meeting or until information requested is provided.
6. No proposal may continue to, the City Council until the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council.;
7. If any major changes are made to the plans or new information is brought
forward after review by the Planning Commission, the City Council may
ask that the project return to, the Planning Commission for review.
F. CITY COUNCIL
The City Council shall make t6e,flnj�decision on any PUD application. A
final PUD plan shall,be approved;,along with ',,an Ordinance. The approved
ordinanceand PUD development plan shall dictate any future development
on the subject property, unless the PUD is amended or the PUD is allowed
to expire.
The City Council shall use the information provided by City staff, the
recommendation from the Planning Commission, and the input from the
public and the'p,roject�deWeloper to approve or deny and proposed PUD.
1.,� The City Council may add conditions to the project that they feel are
necessary to meet the intent of the PUD Ordinance.
iv
2. Should the; ,City Council require more information; the item can be tabled
to a future meeting.
3. All conditions imposed by the Council shall become binding and shall be
met before the project may proceed.
PUD PROCESS FLOW CHART
Pre Application meeting
with planning staff.
Sumittal of Application
Packet and Applicable
Fees
Application reviewed and
public hearing scheduled.
Notification prepared for
rcevie�u�
newspaperand mailing
list. Sign posted on the
subject property.
approved
Final
Action and
Ordinance
prepared
8.6 TIMELINE AND EXPIRATION
A. VALIDATION
A PUD shall be validated once any portion of the property has been platted and
recorded or a building permit is approved.
B. ZONING ORDINANCE
Because a PUD is a zoning action approved through City Council by Ordinance,
the City shall file the ordinance approving the designation of a PUD on a tract
of land, with the County Clerk's Office upon platting and recording any portion
of the PUD.
C. EXPIRATION
For any PUD in which there has been no
of the property platted after five (5) yea
the PUD shall be considered null and void
Planning Commission and City Council for
on the property. Upon approval of
Administrator shall transmit in writing the
Commentary: PUD's are approv
zoning of the site shall not expiry
D. EXTENSIONS
An extension may be granted by
the 5 year- expiration date. PUD's
of two (2) additional years, provi
askine---for .the extension no less 1
1. Reason for
X. That there
Council.
3.' Ezoected d
must
building permit issued nor any portion
rs since approval by the City Council,
and shalt be brought back before the
re- approval prior to any development
the PUD by the City Council, the
date by which the PUD will expire.
The underlining
►D overlay shall expire.
the Administrator for PUD's that are nearing
may be extended one (1) time for a maximum
ded a letter is submitted to the Administrator
.hal "two (2) months prior to the five (5) year
indicate the following:
to the original PUD approved by the City
by which a portion of the PUD will be platted
It shall be the developing party's responsibly to ask for and sign the letter of
extension. Ifi �no extension has been sought and granted, said PUD shall be
considered expired and must be re- approved by the Planning Commission and
City Council following the process prescribed in this Chapter. If no portion of
the property has been platted nor any building permit received by the
Community Development Department, within the two (2) year extension
period, said PUD shall expire and a new PUD application must be submitted.
8.7 AMENDMENTS
There may be instances when a change or amendment to the original PUD is
necessary or desired. In these situations, the magnitude of these amendments
is considered. There are two types of amendments that can occur with a valid
PUD, a major amendment and a minor amendment.
A. MAJOR AMENDMENT
A major amendment is described as a significant change that increases the
density, intensifies the use, or creates inconsistencies with the character of the
PUD that was initially approved shall proceed through the entire PUD process as
outlined in this chapter.
1. The Administrator shall determine if the changes to the PUD meet the
criteria for a major amendment, is an appropriate change, and will
maintain the spirit of what was�approved in the original PUD.
2. An appeal from the Administrators decision that the changes to the PUD
construe a major amendment shall be made in writing by filing a notice of
appeal to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the
Administrators decision. Said appeal shall be heard a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission, at which - -, time the applicant defend his
proposal. Appeals shall not require public notification.
B. MINOR AMENDMENT
Small changes that meet the intent of the; ordinance, do not increase the
density, are consistent with surroundin�`rdevelopment, and do not pose a threat
to the health, safety, or welfare of the City of Owasso can be administratively
approved`as a;inor Amendment. Minor amendments may also include
relocation of l%o andscape,areas, parking areas, drive aisles, or other similar
changes that are minor in scope.
amendments shall be approved administratively and may only be
red to go before the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC).
8.8 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
The required conceptual plan shall be a rendered plan that clearly articulates
the overall concept of the PUD. Figure 8.1 illustrates an acceptable conceptual
site plan rendering. The site plan shall include the entire PUD area, and may
include site plans of smaller areas to provide more specificity if the
development is large.
1. The site plan shall include, at a minimum, the following:
a) Name of the proposed development.
b)
C)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
t)
M)
n)
Name and address of the property owner and developer.
Name of the preparer of the document.
Graphic scale drawn at a scale no smaller than 1:100, a north arrow,
date of preparation, and a legend. Vicinity map outlining the
location of the development in relation to major streets within 1000
feet, schools, and other landmarks. The County where the
development lies shall be depicted.
Legal description of the property shall be provided. Total acreage
of the tract, total acreage of the proposed area to be improved, and
acreage of open space. Location and name of abutting subdivisions
and City Limit Lines.
Wooded areas, wetlands, waterways, ftoodplain and floodway,
ponds and other natural features shall be depicted.
Location of all proposed streets.
Location of each proposed building` (single- family residences or
duplexes not required)
Proposed density of the development depicted ' in gross density
figures (gross units per acre of the entire development)
Location and identification of all land ° uses within the PUD shall be
depicted. Identification of alt amenity locations, detention areas,
open space areas, etc shall be clearly depicted.
Location of parking, areas.
Depiction of any proposed walking "trails, pathways, and buffer
yards, including fences."
Notation on the plan of how, wide the buffer yards will be and how
they will be landscaped`
Location and type of amenities provided
Figure 8.7 -1
B. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
Should a conceptual site plan be provided that goes into sufficient detail
necessary for submittal of a preliminary plat, the plan may be used as the
preliminary plat for the PUD project. If the site plan is to be used as the
preliminary plat, it must contain all of the required elements for preliminary
plat approval outlined in the subdivision regulations of the City of Owasso. If
the PUD is approved with a site plan that is sufficient to be used as a
preliminary plat, the applicant may proceed to the final plat stage.
Commentary: It is not required that the entire development be platted,
only the portion the applicant intends to develop initially.
8.9 DESIGN AND INTENT STATMENT
A. REQUIREMENTS
The design and intent statement shalt clearly articulate the vision for the
proposed development and shall identify key elements of the project that
justify using a PUD approach over conventional zoning.
1. At a minimum, the design and intent statement shall include some basic
elements, listed below.
a. Overall project statement of proposed use and intent.
b. List of the proposed land uses including residential densities
c. List of all parties involved (applicant, owner, agent, plan preparer)
d. Thorough narrative explaining why the development is appropriate,
how it complies with the PUD ordinance. The applicant should
explain how the PUD is consistent with the goals, purposes, and
e. A, statement regarding the compatibility of the proposed
development with the surrounding area. The statement should
address buffer zones, transition, screening, types of materials to be
used, square footage of structures, .
f. A table showing how the proposed PUD will differ from current bulk
standards; with an outline of what sections of the zoning ordinance
or subdivision regulations that the PUD seeks relief from.
g. An, outline of the covenants that will govern the property and
information about the development of a Homeowners Association
and how they will govern the common areas.
h. An anticipated timeline for development, which may include a
phasing plan.
i. The PUD's consistency with the Owasso Land Use Master Plan.
Sections 8.90 -8.99 Reserved
RESIDENTIAL $1 NGLE FAMILY NE'W CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPOlRT AUGUST 20112
Month
2003
20014
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
11 January
54
30
31
22
13
25
15
17
16
19
2
4
3 March
38
75
65
So
25
35
30
46
14
27'
4
5 McV
29
31
43
36
60
23
27
30
20
23
6
42
3
19
7 July
32
3,4
27
12
23
24
28
1: 7
20
1 5
8 ?0.06-sf
9 Septembef
52
64
35
112
17
40
20
11
12
10 b6f
11 November
35
31
32
13
26
113
1
8
12
Totals
479
528
518
336
301
267
303
246
179
1164
YTD
293
356
368
270
219
19•
221
212
139
164
30,000,000
25,,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000.000
510
0
AIJGUST'�
. .................
AUGUST YEAR-TO-DATE DOLLAR'S
x4,855 20,269,824
. . . . .. . . ............... ...............
2008 i 2009
2010
20111
21012
19,925,4011 25,733,241
31,190,464
16,421,519
20,269,,824
. . . ............ . . .
--- — --- ...
TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
. .. .. .. .... .............
x4,855 20,269,824
. . . . .. . . ............... ...............
COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT AUGUST 20112
Month
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2.007
20108
2009
2010
20111
2012
t January
01
0
1
2
9
4
4
1
1
3
1
2.
3 March
3
11
2
1
14
2
0
1
3
0
0
4 Apdf
I
51 May
4
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
6 J1 Y0
44
7 July
1
01
0
0
0
0
1
01
0
8 Y
9 September
2
2
1
2
7
28
3
0
0
0
III November
1
1
3
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
12 bee
TO M$
23
12
23
23
43
20
91
10
11
7
Y7D
12
9
19
19
37
14
14
7
7
9
7
CITY OF OWASSO
RESIDENTIAL LOT INVENTORY STATUS
August 31, 2012
SUBDIVISION
Burberry Place (6/09)
Camelot Estates (4/07)
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
Champions East (05/08)
Champions West (5/08)
Country Estates III (3/99)
Country Estates VI (11/03)
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
Fairways V (8/99)
Fairways VI (12/00)
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
Honey Creek (4/02)
Keys Landing (3/08)
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
Maple Glen (12/08)
Maple Glen II (1/11)
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
Preston Lakes (12/00)
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
Remington Park II (11/04)
Sawgrass Park II (04/05)
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
Watercolours (12/02)
TOTALS
# OF LOTS
89
139
171
66
45
61
37
101
71
42
85
24
202
131
114
235
98
93
20
44
58
272
147
84
96
31
40
2596
# DEVELOPED
50
51
55
6
2
58
36
93
57
40
84
22
198
99
84
190
95
76
17
43
9
243
144
82
94
26
31
1985
# AVAILABLE
39
88
116
60
43
3
1
8
14
2
1
2
4
32
30
45
3
17
3
1
49
29
3
2
2
5
9
611
Watercolours (12/02)
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
Sawgrass Park II (04105)
Remington Park II (11/04)
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
Preston Lakes (12/00)
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
Maple Glen II (1/11)
Maple Glen (12/08)
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
Keys Landing (3/08)
Honey Creek (4102)
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12105)
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
Fairways V1 (12/00)
Fairways V (8199)
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
Country Estates VI (11/03)
Country Estates 111 (3/99)
Champions West(5 /08)
Champions East (05/08)
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
Camelot Estates (4/07)
Burberry Place (6/09)
CITY OF OWASSO
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
■Lots Developed 13Tota1 Lots
PERMITS APPLIED FOR IN AUGUST 2012
ADDRESS
BUILDER
ADD /ZONE
VALUE
A.S.F.
PERMIT #
DATE
11910 E 102 St N
Blue Haven Pools
SG /RS -3
$ 40,000
426
12- 0801 -P
8/2/2012
9500 N 129 E Ave
Sign World
CC /CS
$ 5,000
48
12- 0802 -S
8/2/2012
9053 N 121 E Ave
WK Construction
SM /CS
$ 500,000
3010
12- 0803 -C
8/6/2012
11007 N 117 E Ave
Capital Homes
MGIURS -3
$ 87,476
1809
12- 0804 -X
8/7/2012
11006 N 118 E Ave
Simmons Homes
MGIURS -3
$ 85,980
1833
12- 0805 -X
8/9/2012
8415 N 125 E Ave
Boyd Family Dentistry
OSP /OL
$ 1,500
16
12- 0806 -S
8/9/2012
15301 E 110 PI N
Simmons Homes
LVIV/RS -3
$ 100,815
1833
12- 0807 -X
8/9/2012
7606 E 83 P1 N
Old School Construction
CP/RS -3
$ 153,120
2784
12- 0808 -X
8/14/2012
9021 N 121 E Ave
Superior Graphic
SF /CS
$ 9,000
96
12- 0809 -S
8/14/2012
9045 N 121 E Ave #100
Crown Neon
SF /CS
$ 4,000
24
12- 0810 -S
8/15/2012
9508 N 96 E Pl
Shaw Homes
LBR/RS -3
$ 186,230
3386
12- 0811 -X
8/20/2012
9404 E 92 P1 N
Shaw Homes
LBR/RS -3
$ 228,965
4163
12- 0812 -X
8/20/2012
9402 E 91 St N
Landmark Homes
LBR/RS -3
$ 163,652
2975
12- 0813 -X
8/21/2012
9455 Owasso Expressway
Claude Neon
TP /CS
$ 7,200
78
12- 0814 -S
8/21/2012
12334 E 86 St N
Rainbow Signs
EC /CS
$ 4,000
45
12- 0815 -S
8/21/2012
10541 N 121 E Ave
Simmons Homes
BBP /RS -3
$ 146,960
2672
12- 0816 -X
8/21/2012
12905 E 96 St N
Sam's Club
WFA/CS
$ 7,500,000
139365
12- 0817 -C
8/22/2012
12349 E 86 St N
CBCI
LRS /CG
$ 145,000
2400
12- 0818 -C
8/22/2012
10849 E 109 P1 N
Rob Smith
CR/RE
$ 25,000
1680
12- 0819 -X
8/22/2012
8501 Owasso Expressway
Keith Haney
UP /CG
$ 450,000
10609
12- 0820 -C
8/26/2012
7770 N Owasso Expressway
KRB
FC /CG
$ 8,500
1500
12- 0821 -C
8/27/2012
12103 E 70 St N
Strategic Builders
KL/RS -3
$ 163,350
2970
12- 0822 -X
8/27/2012
12005 E 70 St N
Strategic Builders
KLJRS -3
$ 138,600
2520
12- 0823 -X
8/27/2012
12112 E 69 St N
Strategic Builders
KL/RS -3
$ 143,000
2600
12- 0824 -X
8/27/2012
15009 E 110 St N
Simmons Homes
LVIV/RS -3
$ 139,120
1939
12-0825-X
8/27/2012
15104 E 110 St N
Simmons Homes
LVIV/RS -3
$ 164,080
2251
12- 0826 -X
8/27/2012
11000 N 118 E Ave
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS -3
$ 85,980
1833
12- 0827 -X
8/27/2012
10914 N 117 E Pl 1
Capital Homes
MGIURS -3
$ 77,632
1351 1
12- 0828 -X
8/28/2012
15 Single Family
$ 2,064,960
36,919 S Ft
1 Residential Remodel
$ 25,000
1680 SgFt
2 New Commercial
$ 8,000,000
142,375 SgFt
3 Commercial Remodel
$ 603,500
14,509 SgFt
6 Signs
$ 30,700
307 S Ft
1 Pool
$ 40,000
426 SgFt
28 Building Permits
$ 10,764,160
196,216 SgFt
OCCUPANCY PERMITS
NAME ADDRESS APPLICATION OPENING COMPLETE
DATE DATE
AUGUST 2012
JULY 2012
AT &T
7707 N Owasso Exp #7
7/1/2012
713/2012
Yes
Boyd Dentistry
8415 N 125 E Ave
11/15/2011
7/20/2012
Yes
JUNE 2012
11691 N. Garnett Rd.
11/14/2011
11/14/2011
Yes
The Copper Kiln
122 S Main St
6/1/2012
6/29/2012
Yes
MAY 2012
12711 E. 86 PI. N. #108
11/15/2011
11/30/2011
Yes
APRIL 2012
Luna De Noche
9500 N 129 E Ave #130
4/5/2012
4/12/2012
Yes
Golden Dragon Taekwondo 13720 E 86 St N
4/5/2012
4/9/2012
Yes
Blue Phoenix
9500 N 129 E Ave #
4/10/2012
4/26/2012
Yes
MARCH 2012
Fire In The Hole
126 S. Main St.
9/1/2011
9/23/2011
Duffy's
11610 E 86 St N
3/5/2012
3/10/2012
Yes
Life Church
14008 E 96 St N
512/2011
3/3/2012
Yes
Edward Jones
9540 N Garnett
1/22/2012
3/22/2012
Yes
Dayana's Hair Salon
11622 E 86 St N
312/2012
3/20/2012
Yes
Iglesia Pentecostal
12111 N Garnett
3/22/2012
3/22/2012
Yes
Idol Nails & Spa
12412 E 86 St N
3/14/2012
3/17/2012
Yes
FEBRUARY 2012
Pet Hotel
8355 N. Owasso Exp.
2/1/2012
2/3/2012
Yes
Green Hill Funeral Home
9901 N. Owasso Exp.
2/6/2012
2/1612012
Yes
Akira Sushi Bar
9455 N Owasso Exp. #E
1/15/2012
2/10/2012
Yes
Family Animal Medicine
9200 N. Garnett
2/22/2012
2/22/2012
Yes
Owasso Medical Campus
12455 N. 100 E. Ave. #300
2/29/2012
2/29/2012
Yes
R"XilI_1z ;WITIV
DECEMBER 2011
Dog Daycare & Kennel
8355 N. Owasso Expy
12/1/2011
12/1/2011
Yes
NOVEMBER 2011
Ma's Caf6
11691 N. Garnett Rd.
11/14/2011
11/14/2011
Yes
Boomarang Diner
13720 E. 86 St. N. #190
11/16/2011
11/16/2011
Yes
Creative Clips
12711 E. 86 PI. N. #108
11/15/2011
11/30/2011
Yes
OCTOBER 2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts
13318 E. 116th St. N.
10/31/2011
10/31/2011
Yes
Top Cut
12409 E. 96th E. Ave.
10/31/2011
10/31/2011
Yes
SEPTEMBER 2011
Fire In The Hole
126 S. Main St.
9/1/2011
9/23/2011
Yes
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
City of Owasso Public Works Department
September 10, 2012
E. 86th Street North Widening (from Main Street to N. Memorial Drive)
- Funding for the construction of this project is a result of a "matching grant "; 80%
ODOT funding and 20% City funding.
- ODOT awarded the contract to BECCO of Tulsa, Oklahoma in the amount of
$6.9 million.
- Public Meeting was held on March 15, 2012 @ 6:30 pm at the Bailey Ranch Golf
Course. 8 citizens attended, as well as representatives from ODOT, Tulsa County
and BECCO.
- Official construction time began April 2, 2012.
- Phase I Road Improvements - Memorial to Mingo - April 2, 2012 to August 1, 2012.
- Phase II Road Improvements - Mingo to Main Street - August 1, 2012 to
November 4, 2012.
- In an effort to offset delays caused by utility and right -of -way conflicts, effective
September 4th, both Phase I and Phase II will be closed concurrently until
adequate improvements on Phase I will allow traffic to flow in a safe manner.
Phase I will re -open partially complete in early October. Storm Drain installation
on the north side of 86th between Main and Mingo is now in progress and is
approximately 90% complete. Starting September 10th the drainage ditch
structure crossing 86th at the golf course will be removed and installation of the
cast in place structure will begin. The roadway base work on Phase I is
approximately 95% complete while completion of the Ranch Creek Bridge is
expected within the next 3 weeks. The closure of both phases will allow for the
contractor to complete the project more in accordance with the original
contract date.
E. 106TH Street North and Garnett Road Intersection Improvement Proiect
- A $750,000 grant from ODOT was approved February 2009.
- On March 24, 2009, Council awarded an engineering design contract to PSA
Dewberry.
- Utility relocations are complete.
- On August 29th INCOG Transportation Technical Advisory Committee and the
Transportation Policy Committee voted to recommend this project as eligible to
receive STP funds. The INCOG Board of Directors will meet on Thursday,
September 13th to consider and take appropriate action related to the
recommendation. If approved, staff will request these funds (FY 2016) be moved
up to FY 2012 so we can implement the bidding phase by late fall of the this year.
• Santa Fe Lift Station and Force Main Improvements
- February 2010, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount
of $145,874 to Greely and Hansen Engineering.
- November 2011, OPWA Trustees awarded a construction contract to W.N.
Couch in the amount of $2,636,700. The project is now scheduled to be
complete in October 2012.
- Change order #1 was approved by OPWA Trustees and as a result the 36" pipe
on the West side of the wet well infrastructure has been installed to
accommodate the future Ranch Creek Interceptor upgrade. Construction crews
are preparing for the installation of the roof of the wet well and the footings for
the electrical building. This project is anticipated to be finalized in October.
Three Lakes Stormwater Channel Improvements
- Project includes widening and shaping of the north /south channel east of US
Hwy 169, from to 83rd Street North southward to the end of the existing concrete
channel.
The engineering design is being performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 90% complete.
In April 2012, AT&T mobilized and completed the relocation of their utility.
USACE has approved the engineering design. Staff is completing the changes
requested by the government agencies and will be ready to bid the project in
September.
East 106th Street North Water Improvements
- Project includes extending 12" water line from 106th Street North /N. 1 10th East
Avenue to 106th Street North and Mingo Road.
- The engineering design was performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 100% complete.
- Owasso Public Works water crews have installed over 400' of water line on this
project. Crews are working as diligently as possible while maintaining the
everyday water division issues such as leaks and new service connections.
• E. 76th Street North Widening (from U.S. Hwy169 to N. 129th East Avenue
- In October 2010, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $2,090,000 for engineering, right -of -way
and utility relocation costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the
City of Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund. This phase of the project is targeted
for federal assistance in FY 2014 or sooner, depending on funding availability.
- In October 2011, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $3,470,000 for construction and
administration costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the City of
Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund. This phase of the project will be targeted
for federal assistance in FY 2015 or sooner, depending on funding availability.
- In February 2012, ODOT officials informed City staff of funds available in the
Federal Surface Transportation Fund for the planning phase of E. 76th Street North
Widening Project.
- In March, INCOG presented this project to its members for consideration to
receive funding in 2012 for the engineering design. Project was approved by the
Technical Advisory and Transportation Policy Committees.
- In April 2012, the recommendation was submitted to the INCOG Board of
Directors for consideration and approval. The project was approved by the
members.
- Engineering qualifications were received by ODOT in late July. We anticipate
interviews in August or September
• FY201 1 -2012 Street Rehabilitation Project
- The City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $368,059 to
Tri -Star Construction during the March 20, 2012 meeting.
- Staff conducted a pre- construction meeting with the contractor in early May.
Construction began in mid -May with completion scheduled in August.
- This project will be completed in the first week of August. Staff intends to bring
this project to the second meeting in August for acceptance and authorization
for final payment. This project was completed within budget and on schedule.
- Final punch list items and any deficiencies are in the process of being addressed
by the contractor and staff anticipates bringing this project for acceptance by
council at the September 18th council meeting.
Ranch Creek Sanitary Sewer Improvements
- May 2012, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount of
$175,000 to Kellogg Engineering INC.
- The design is approximately 10% complete with completion expected in June
2013.
Staff is working with the Larkin Bailey Trust on gaining access to their property
adjacent to the railroad between 76th Street North and 86th Street North to
determine the feasibility of a potential alignment along the railroad property.
Staff has been granted permission by the Larkin Bailey Trust to enter property and
clear right -of -way for the survey crews. Clearing will begin the first week of
September.
• Garnett Widening (from E. 96th Street North to E. 106th Street North
- A request for qualifications for engineering and architectural design services was
advertised in July. The Public Works Department received thirteen submittals from
local engineering firms. City staff has reviewed each submitted qualification
statement and is preparing a draft of the engineering agreement. The proposed
engineering services agreement will be presented to the City Council during the
October work session for review and discussion.
FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Project
- May 2012, City Council approved the FY 2012 -2013 project list.
- July 2012, City Council approved the Inter -local Agreement between City of
Owasso and Tulsa County.
- Engineering Division is approximately 95% complete with design and bid
specifications.
- Staff anticipates bid advertisement in early September with bid opening in early
October. Construction is expected to commence in November with Final
Completion in April 2013, weather permitting.
a ,����MIII w►
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: DIRECTOR'S REPORT
DATE: September 13, 2012
RETAIL & SERVICE DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
• Christian Brothers Automotive construction progresses south of 96 Street N on Garnett
Road.
• Two new businesses will open soon on Main Street. Detailed information will be
announced next month.
• Braums will begin construction soon on their Fresh Market store on 96th Street N near the
northeast corner of the Garnett intersection.
• Construction progresses on the Coney Islander /Little Caesar's Pizza building adjacent, to
the west of Bank of the Lakes on 86th Street N.
• The second Taco Bueno location has begun construction on 116th Street N.
HEALTH CARE UPDATE
• Senior Suites, a full service nursing facility is under construction on land to the south of the
St. John Owasso medical campus.
MISC. UPDATES
• The City Council approved the contract between the city and Retail Attractions on
Tuesday, August 21st,