HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.11.08_OEDA AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: November 8, 2012
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: Owasso City Hall, Lower Level Conference Room
111 N. Main
Owasso, Oklahoma
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 6, 2012. ,-
f
Chelsea.E. Harkins, con mic Development Director
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
Mr. Charney, Chairman
2. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Trustee approval of the
Consent Agenda. All matters listed under "Consent" are considered by the Trustees to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion. Any Trustee may, however, remove an item
from the Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non -
debatable.
A. Approval of minutes of the October 11, 2012 Regular Meeting.
Attachment
B. Approval of claims.
Attachment
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report.
Attachment
3. Discussion of proposed amendments to the Planned Unit Development section of the
Owasso Zoning Code.
Mr. Fritschen
Attachment
4. Report from Economic Development Director
• Monthly Building Report
• Public Works Project Status Report
• Business Development Report
Ms. Harkins
Attachment
5. Report from OEDA Manager
Mr. Ray
OEDA
November 8, 2012
Page 2
6. Report from OEDA Trustees
7. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen
at the time of posting of the agenda.)
8. Adjournment
MEETING OF THE
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF MEETING
Thursday, October 11, 2012
The Owasso Economic Development Authority met in regular session on Thursday, October 11,
2012 in the Lower Level Conference Room at City Hall per the Notice of Public Meeting and
Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 5:00 PM on Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Secretary Gary Akin called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM.
PRESENT
Gary Akin, Secretary
Bryan Spriggs, Trustee
Dee Sokolosky, Trustee
Dirk Thomas, Trustee
Jeri Moberly, Trustee
A quorum was declared present.
ABSENT
Frank Enzbrenner, Vice Chairman
David Charney, Chairman
ITEM 2: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR TRUSTEE
APPROVAL OF THE OEDA CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of minutes of the September 13, 2012 Regular Meeting
B. Approval of claims
C. Acceptance of the monthly financial report
Dr. Thomas moved to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Ms. Moberly.
AYE: Spriggs, Akin, Sokolosky, Thomas, Moberly
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 3: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SECTION OF THE OWASSO ZONING CODE
Mr. Fritschen presented comments received regarding the proposed amendments to
the Planned Unit Development section of the Owasso Zoning Code. Discussion was
held. It was further explained that the proposal would be placed on the November
2012 OEDA agenda for further discussion.
October 11, 2012
ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A RECOMMENDATION TO
THE OWASSO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE
TULSA METRO CHAMBER TULSA'S FUTURE II ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ms. Harkins presented the item. Mr. Sokolosky moved to recommend approval of the
City's continued participation in the Tulsa's Future II Economic Development Program
to the Owasso City Council, seconded by Dr. Thomas.
AYE: Akin, Sokolosky, Thomas, Moberly
NAY: None
ABSTAIN: Spriggs
Motion carried 4 -1.
ITEM 5: DISCUSSION RELATED TO AREA SALES TAX COMPARISONS
Ms. Harkins presented additional information in order to compare sales tax rates in
the Tulsa Metro cities, as well as consumer spending patterns in various cities.
ITEM 6: REPORT FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Ms. Harkins introduced Roger Stevens and Karl Fritschen to provide a monthly status
report of the Public Works and Community Development departments. Ms. Harkins
provided information related to various economic development activities.
ITEM 7: REPORT FROM OEDA MANAGER
No Report. Dr. Spriggs requested that a reoccurring item be placed on each OEDA
agenda to review the monthly sales tax report.
ITEM 8: REPORT FROM OEDA TRUSTEES
No Report.
ITEM 9: NEW BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT
Dr. Thomas moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Dr. Spriggs
AYE: Spriggs, Akin, Sokolosky, Thomas, Moberly
NAY: None
ABSTAIN:
Motion carried 5 -0.
At 11:20 AM, the meeting adjourned.
M
Juliann Stevens, Minute Clerk
r
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CLAIMS, OEDA
DATE: November 8, 2012
No Claims for October 2012.
Owasso Economic Development Authority
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets
For the Month Ending October 31, 2012
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Materials & supplies
Services & other charges
Capital outlay
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
Non - Operating Revenues (Expenses):
Investment income
Promissory note revenue
RAN debt service & other costs
Total non - operating revenues (expenses)
Net income (loss) before contributions and
transfers
Transfer to general fund
Change in net assets
Total net assets - beginning
Total net assets - ending
" Investment Income Estimated
MTD
YTD
Budget
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
(5,000.00)
0.69
2.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.69
0.00
0.69
2.75
(5,000.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.69
(5,000.00)
9,046.36
9,046.36
$9,049.11
$4,046.36
E
X r
TO: The Honorable Chair and Trustees
Owasso Economic Development Authority
FROM: Karl Fritschen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment - Planned Unit Development Chapter
DATE: November 8, 2012
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council Work Session on October 9, 2012, staff presented a revised draft of the new
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Chapter of the Owasso Zoning Code for review and
discussion. This draft was also presented to the Owasso Economic Development Authority
(OEDA) October 11, 2012 and discussed with the Planning Commission on October 8, 2012. The
proposed new chapter has also been available on the city website and Facebook page to
allow for public comment and discussion. Based on continued discussions and input received
with the above referenced bodies, staff made some additional changes to the document and
has prepared a third draft for the City Council's review.
The main topic of concern continues to be centered on the neighborhood meeting and
whether it should be voluntary or mandatory. Another topic of discussion has been what role of
the Planning Commission shall play in the process. Since the October 9, 2012 City Council work
session, staff contacted several Cities in the region and discovered that most strongly
encourage s a neighborhood meeting, but only one, Bartlesville, requires one. Most
communities seem to place more emphasis on promoting dialog between the applicant and
the Planning Commission at their regular meetings. Considering this information, along with the
input received from the aforementioned bodies, staff revised the document and modified the
language pertaining to the neighborhood meeting. This meeting continues to be voluntary in
nature but language is introduced that strongly emphasizes its importance. Additionally,
language has been added regarding the applicant making a presentation at the Planning
Commission. Staff believes that these changes, along with the other improved elements of the
chapter, will yield quality PUD projects. The revised draft is included with this memo for review,
with the changes noted as crossed out or underlined text and highlighted sentences and
paragraphs.
As with the other text amendments, the PUD Chapter amendments follow a transparent process
which seeks input from all interested stakeholders. Below is an updated schedule for
proceeding with the text amendment for Chapter 8 of the Zoning Code, Planned Unit
Developments and Overlay Districts.
✓ August 9, 2012 - Presented the proposed amendments to the Owasso Economic
Development Authority (OEDA)
✓ August 14, 2012 - Presented the proposed amendments to the Owasso City Council at
work session
✓ August 15, 2012 - Placed the proposed amendments on the city website and city
Facebook page
✓ August 15 through 31 - Met individually with the Planning Commission members
• September 10, 2012 - Discussed the item at the Planning Commission meeting
• September 11, 2012 - Second presentation and discussion with the Owasso City Council
at work session
• September 13, 2012 - Second presentation and discussion with the OEDA
✓ October 8, 2012 - Planning Commission - continued discussion
✓ October 9, 2012 - Third presentation to the City Council at work session
✓ October 11, 2012 -Third presentation to the OEDA
• November 8, 2012 - Fourth presentation to the OEDA
• November 12, 2012 - Planning Commission - continued discussion
• November 13, 2012 - Fourth presentation to the City Council at work session
• December 10, 2012 - Planning Commission Action
• December 18, 2012 - Public hearing at the City Council meeting
• January 1, 2013 - City Council action for approval of an ordinance
REASON FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGE:
These changes are being considered to establish a level and predictable playing field for all
applicants choosing to use the PUD method for development, while at the same time ensuring
sustainable quality development. Furthermore, the amendments help ensure a higher quality
standard and consistency throughout the entire community, which maintains and increases
property values. These changes are also consistent with the vision set forth by the approved
Quality of Life Initiative document.
ACTION:
This item is for discussion purposes, but will be brought forth to the Planning Commission for
action in December 2012.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. 3rd Draft, PUD Chapter
B. Comparison table with other communities
CHAPTER 8
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
8.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a special zoning overlay that provides alternatives
to conventional land development. Upon approval, it becomes a supplement to the
existing zoning of the subject property. A PUD is also a means of encouraging creative
development of land and promotes project design that is often unseen in conventional
development. A PUD shall not be seen as a tool to circumvents ,the zoning and
subdivisions regulations of the City of Owasso, but rather as a tool for`rntelligent, well -
planned, and quality developments that fit within Owasso'stekist ng neighborhoods and
context of the surrounding area. A PUD provides 1flexibility to allow�,,Ior the
development on properties with unique physical ,characteristics by 'promoting
„rt
innovative design and providing guidelines which ensure that,development is beneficial
to the City of Owasso's future growth. While great flexibility i§,g�iven to provide special
restrictions which will allow development nottriotherwise perhil ed, procedures are
established herein to ensure against misuse of they ncreased flexibiti y.
8.2 GOALS
Because PUD's allow greater flexibly�jt
zoning, there are specific goals that ri,
PUD's shall be evaluated on,«theirtsabili
se would be allowed with the base
co�mplished with each application. All
plish the following:
1. Maintain and Enhance the Quality of Lif& in Owasso
2. Provide Opportunities for Urban lnfill
3. Maintain and Promote1 'Sense ofrt`ommunity
4. Encourage, Development" int Otherwise Could Not Occur on the Site
5. Preserveand,,Provide Mear,i ul Open Space
6. Promote Connectivity and Compatibility with Surrounding Development
7. Inspire Unique andJThoughtful Development
8. Support,the, Development of Strong Neighborhoods
9. Provide'Amenities;lBeyond Conventional Development
Preserve the Physical Characteristics of the Land
0
8.3 APPLICABILI'TY
ug
1. A UD may be submitted for any parcel of land located within any general zoning
di's'trict or combination of general zoning districts within the Owasso City Limits.
In all cases, the PUD will be reviewed as to the proposed location and character of
the uses and the unified treatment of the development of the tract. The
regulations of the general zoning district or districts remain applicable except as
specifically modified pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
2. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan is required prior to development of a
PUD district. Comprehensive Development Plans are subject to recommendation
by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council.
3. This PUD chapter shall complement the other sections of the Owasso Zoning Code.
In instances where the requirements are conflicting, the Community Development
Administrator shall determine the correct action.
A Conceptual
for rezoning.
8.4 MINIMUM STANDARDS
DENSITY
By their very nature, PUD's are designed to
unusual, natural or man -made conditions.
makes use of and preserves such unique fe;
density within developments. If clusterir
amenities shall be provided; the design sha
space; and a layout shall be provided that (
All PUD's shall calculate dens
include flood plains, rights of
for the project that shallt
calculations shall be provided
Single-Family R
exceed a gross
residential Oeve
(5) units per ac
of the decisi
increased densil
request
if 4and with unique or
)te development that
necessary to cluster
proposed, additional
aintain useable open
existing conditions of
ss area of the tract, which may
provide an overall gross density
per acre. The gross density
and Intent Statement.
A residential PUD shall not
ve (5) dwelling units per acre for single- family
a development propose a density higher than five
cation shall be provided explaining the rationale
amenities shall be provided to mitigate the
HV*eside itial Densities - Multi - family densities shall be consistent with
of'&116wasso Zoning Code and shall not exceed a maximum of twenty -
units per acre gross density. Any proposed development that contains
its /acre shall provide an explanation of why the higher density would be
:e and how the additional density would be mitigated. All multi - family
I developments shall be accomplished through a PUD.
B. LAND USE PERCENTAGES
In any residential PUD, at least 20% of the gross area of the tract should be
devoted to open space, common areas or amenities. Rights -of -way and utility
easements on individual lots shall not apply to open space calculations. If at least
20% open space cannot be achieved, the project may be required shall to provide
additional amenities in - additiee_to those required in section 8.4 L. in order to
mitigate the reduction in open space. Because all PUD projects are unique, the
N
administrator shall determine if additional amenities are required in relation to
the amount of open space provided.
C. PRESERVATION OF TREES AND OTHER NATURAL FEATURES
PUD's shall be designed to preserve and enhance the existing physical
characteristics of the land and the natural vegetation that exists on the land.
Projects that require clear cutting or denuding of large tracts of land for
development are discouraged. Trees in excess of eight (8) inches in caliper shall
be preserved and worked into the overall design of the project, unless the
applicant can provide substantial justification to remove ,,,;said', trees. Tree
preservation credits shall be applied to all landscaping ,plans and additional
landscaping shall be required for projects that remove excessive healthy
vegetation.
D. SCREENING AND BUFFERING
,tilJ(If t,r,
Screening is an important part of any PUD proposal, especially when incompatible
uses are proposed within the PUD, or exist in adjoining d`e��elopments. Screening
�;:
may be employed in the form of: -� ,
1. Fencing - MRAeFials Wood fencing shall have metal posts placed on the
inside.,
t
2. Walls - Stone, brick, split faced�,block, or similar decorative materials shall be
used. ,�, �lrt;
3. Berms - Berms may be used j combination wi f lvegetation or fencing to
achieve the desired result 'Ql 1�i[� fifr�llr�r�l,J 11t11
4. Vegetation - Vegetationj�provides,a' ,screening mechanism that can be
efficient and aesth`' ticalty� leasingIM, In,, any cases, leaving the natural
vegetation as atmeans of scre6ing ac ieves the desired results.
5. New vegetation may be plante that also achieves the intent of this
section. Matenals'`and sizes of vegetation shall be provided with the required
Conce0tual Development Plan and conform to Chapter 20 of the Zoning Code.
Buffer yards,s�liall, be provide" d at all boundaries of the PUD where higher intensity
or higher density��uses adjoin existing tracts that are of a lower intensity or
density ,, �exampl'eof this may be 5000 SF lots adjoining an existing single family
development containing 20,000 SF lots. Buffers shall vary in size depending on the
ffl Mitt � uuJrs�
rrt� �� use a&r tl hhe density of the development, but in shall be a minimum of 20 feet in
width Vegetation and screening is required in buffer yards.
j``r `rf1J I flp '-
�,
All residential PUD's shall contain decorative perimete fencing along adjacent
arterial roadways �^ugdiong the development and shall also contain language
covering the long -term maintenance of the fencing. If wood fencing is to be used,
decorative columns of rock, brick, split face block, or similar permanent material
shall be used at regular intervals.
E. TRANSITION OF USES
Great care shall be given as to the location of the more intense uses or densities
within the PUD. Transition shall be achieved when possible by placing less intense
uses along the perimeter of the PUD area with more intense uses near the center
of the PUD. For example, if a PUD is proposed in an area that abuts mostly
3
acreage lots, the PUD should place larger lots meeting RE or RS -1 standards along
the perimeter and move towards smaller lots within the core of the PUD area or
along arterial streets. If transition cannot be achieved, a large and well - vegetated
buffer should be provided.
F. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
Each PUD shall require a landscape concept plan at the time of submittal. The
landscape plan shall depict general locations for landscaping, but shall not be
required to go into great detail on the conceptual plan. Trees, however, shall be
r'rll� €(h,
shown on the conceptual landscape plan. More detailed landscape "`plans may be
required in the later stages of the development process in conformance with the
City's adopted landscape requirements, or if the AdT, istr�ator or Planning
Commission deems it necessary. d i4ng at the ee ep a ' ° ^� °^ '� ^tl°° °.
J4 .1a
G. ADHERENCE TO CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS �r`�1f
All adopted landscape requirements shall be met by any PUD �` °��A PUD shall provide
landscaping that exceeds the City's minimum requirements in order to meet the
goals, purpose, and criteria outlined in the PUD ordinance.l;J
H. SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Low - Impact Design (LID) Cr
All PUD proposals are encoL
techniques can greatly redo
common areas and open spa
areas (rain gardens), �G eei
Vegetated swales,''and Im'pe
to define how, LThpri nci pies
ged Ito incorporate LID techniques. Utilizing LID
infrastructure costs and can be incorporated into
Some Llp design possibilities are: Bio- retention
oofs, Permeable paving or driveways, Cisterns,
's
ousurface reduction. All PUD's are encouraged
all be'aDDtied.
2. Grading and Site Disturbance;,V
PUD sites, shall not be "denuded of all vegetation. Great care should be given to
developrng� „drainage and )"grading plans that incorporate natural areas and
preserve wthfe"�1"topography and vegetation of the PUD area. All creeks or
qw perennial streams , shall have a minimum of a 20 foot undisturbed buffer
measured from `the top of the stream or creek bank and shall be included into
the design Hof the PUD whenever possible.
3 Adherence to City, State, and Federal Requirements
All grading and drainage plans shall meet all City, State and Federal
requirements.
I. PARKING AND CIRCULATION
The developer shall provide plans that depict the safe and efficient movement of
vehicles throughout the PUD. For any PUD that proposes more than two - hundred
(200) residential units, a traffic study shall be provided to the City of Owasso for
review. All Federal, State, and City regulations shall be met by the PUD proposal.
All parking areas, driveways or other means of vehicular access shall be designed in
accordance with Chapter 9 of the Owasso Zoning Code.
11
J. OPEN SPACE
At least 25% of the provided open space shall be developed and maintained for
active or passive recreational activities. The remainder should be kept as
marshland, wildlife areas, woodlands, creeks, etc. At least 10% of the above
reference area shall be out of the floodplain (100 Year) and floodway.
K. COMMON AREAS
Common areas shall be provided throughout the c
enjoyment of the residents of the surrounding area.
interaction and help to create a sense of community.
L. AMENITIES REQUIRED
Any residential PUD development shall provide at
of the categories from the Table 8 -1.
1) For any residential development that F
four (4) units per acre, one an addition
required for each 0.5 units per acre over
2) A developer may propose
explanation of what cat
Development Administrator
determine if an amenity is
3) Amenities maybe is
with a club house
walking trails.
4) Park an, recreation
development so it is
r', the use and
promote social
) amenity`'from each
a gross, density of more than
ty from"fAny category shall be
amenity not provided on the list and an
✓ u'Jt should , fall under. The Community
Pl'nning Commission, or the City Council shall
�table
oue or more park /recreation areas. (i.e. pool
rea11" "ith a basketball court, playground, and
hall be placed in a centralized location within the
ent and accessible.
5) Any standing' water feature or pond shall be re- circulated through a fountain,
waterfall, or other aeration device. This requirement applies to any storm
Pqo
retention ,pp ,,/,d that is maintains a pool elevation of water.
............
6) All amenities will have long -term maintenance requirements that should be
:considered by future Homeowners Associations. Appropriate [an uae should
be included that clearly states that maintenance shall be covered by the
developer until such a time that a Homeowners Association is formed. The
developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake and be
responsible for the ownership, operation, construction and maintenance of
private roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities,
recreation areas, buildings, lighting, security measures, and similar common
elements in a Planned Unit Development.
7) Amenities approved as a part of any PUD should be installed prior to the
completion of the entire project. At least one (1) amenity shall be installed by
the time 25% of the lots are developed and all amenities should be installed or
5
completed prior to 75% of the lots being developed. No building permit shall
be issued if a development does not meet these amenity requirements.
TABLE 8 -1, REQUIRED AMENITIES
CATEGORY AMENITY FEATURE
SPORTS FIELDS, TENNIS COURTS, -BASKETBALL COURTS,
ACTIVE RECREATION VOLLEYBALL COURT, DISC GOLF000RSE, SKATE FACILITIES,
BIKE PATHS, HIKING TRAILS,, ,1601_1` FACILITIES <<
STOCKED FISHING POND, NATUREPRESERVE AREAS OF AT
LEAST 2 ACRES, HORSE SHOE PIT, WILDLIFE VIEWING AREA (IF
PASSIVE RECREATION ADJACENT TO PRESERVED,HABITAT)CAMP GROUNDS,
EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES „MEDITATION AREA, WALKING PATHS
OR TRAILS:. ,,PEDESTRIAN BOULEVARDS. GREENS AND COURTS
DOG PARKS,J�PICNIC AREAS, PAVILLIONS, OUTDOOR
PUBLIC GATHERING AREAS I AMPHITHEATRE, CLU,6HOUSE, GAZEBO, BBQAREA, DOCK
AREAS, COMMUNITY GARDEN, PARK AREA
FAMILY RECREATIONAL AREAS V TOT LOT; SPLASH PAD, SWIMMING POOL, PLAYGROUND
M. CONSISTEN
An ro `'
Y P o
P,s
Use Master
stated with
WITH LAND,USE
rtt,,
PUD shall be dev,i
an. The PUD sha
)ped in accordance with the adopted Owasso Land
meet the Goals, Objectives and Action Strategies
N. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
Each? PUD shall �;be designed in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding
development in the area. If the proposed development is not in character with the
117 L ^
surroundir2, g,,area, the PUD shall show how the development can be screened or
ernp`loys techniques that will mitigate the incompatibility.
8.5 PROC
A. PRE - APPLICATION MEETING
A pre- application meeting is required prior to submitting a formal application for
the proposed PUD project. This step offers the developer a chance to meet with
City staff to discuss ideas related to the development of a PUD on a piece of
property. City staff from different departments shall be available to discuss the
project, answer questions and provide information to the developer.
T
B. SUBMITTAL OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
1. After submittal of a completed PUD application packet with all required
information, the Administrator shall provide a professional review of the
project and shall assist the developer in understanding the PUD process.
2. The Administrator shall require sufficient detail in the Conceptual "Development
Plan to provide an opportunity for the reviewing bodies tq,, make informed
decisions and evaluate compliance with the applicable approval`lcriteria.
3. The Administrator shall provide recommendations "regarding changes or
additions to the PUD that would make the project more consistentrwith the
goals, purpose and standards of the PUD outtmed in "'this chapter. Upon
r
completion of a successful application, the PUD slia"ll°,be placed on the next
available Planning Commission Agenda.„
C. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
1. Prior to the Planning Cc
Committee (TAC) shall
documentation. �
2. The TAC shall provide
engineering, planning, an
3. All TAC comments.; shall E
reviewed by the Planning
Owasso's Technical Advisory
oposal and all supporting
developer regarding utilities,
essed by the developer prior to the PUD being
ssion or City Council.
D. ARTIGNAI NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
While not reauired. a neighborhood meeting between the apDlicant and adioinin
Drooerty owners is strongly encouraged to introduce the Droiect and listen to anv
concerns of the citizens. If such a meeting is held, City Staff will be present to
,,111HO1011i,answer procedural and City- related questions, but will otherwise observe and
report on the discussions held at the meeting. Neighborhood meetings should
sha4 be held at least 14 calendar days prior to the project being heard by the
Planning Commission. It is also suggested that developers provide the Homeowners
Associations of surrounding neighborhoods with a copy of the proposed
development plans.
E. PLANNING COMMISSION
The function of the Planning Commission is to listen to public concerns, afford the
applicant an opportunity to make a formal presentation regarding the project,
review the project for conformity with the requirements of this ordinance, and to
offer suggestions regarding the project design as it relates to impacts to adjoining
properties. It shall be the duty of the Planning Commission to review each PUD
VA
prior to consideration of the City Council. At the Planning Commission meeting, the
applicant shall submit a conceptual development plan and such other narrative or
other graphic information the applicant deems pertinent to the City's initial review
and evaluation of the potential of the Planned Unit Development proposed. At the
Planning Commission meeting, the applicant and interested citizens will have the
opportunity to discuss the merits of the Planned Unit Development proposal. The
Planning Commission will assess the proposal in light of ordinance guidelines and
will take action after weighing the recommendations of the Staff, the applicant's
presentation, and the community's response. The Planning Commission shall review
each application using the following process.
1. Planning Commission Action
a) The Planning Commission shall review each PUD application forconformity
to this ordinance. The Planning Commission action shall follow the'�process
identified in section 1330.3 of the Zoning Code",
b) The Planning Commission shall study the proposed ;PUD application, taking
into account the recommendations of ;the„ staff, thet review criteria and
other applicable standards in this Ordinance If the Planning Commission
determines that the ordinance is not bung rnet �n
NOW areas, then they
may make suggestions to the, applicant and transmit the suggestions to the
flf a
City Council as part of their report. The Planning Commission shall hear
from the general public, and engage the developer in discussion of the
project. r
c) The Plan mng Comrni'ssion, shalC `discuss any potential issues that they feel 'Ilfflh the project Ihas and offer suggestions that may help the project meet the
goals, purpose; ,and criteria identified in this chapter and this information
shall be transmitted to the ,,City Council.
t:
d) The Planning Commission shall have 90 days to act on a PUD application
from the time of the submittal to the Community Development
Department. If after 90 days the Planning Commission cannot render a
decision. the aoolicant may Droceed to the Citv Council for consideration.
hall not be counted towards the 90 days. TX- _.
. .
UNCIL
The City Council shall make the final decision on any PUD application. A final PUD
plan shall be approved along with an Ordinance. The approved ordinance and PUD
development plan shall dictate any future development on the subject property,
unless the PUD is amended or expires.
The City Council shall use the information provided by City staff, the
recommendation from the Planning Commission, input from the public and the
applicant to make a decision as approve or deny and proposed PUD.
1. The City Council may add conditions to the project that they feel are necessary
to meet the intent of the PUD Ordinance.
2. Should the City Council require more information; the item can be tabled to a
future meeting. If any major changes are made to the plans or new information
is brought forward after review by the Planning Commission, the City Council
may ask that the project return to the Planning Commission for review.
3. All conditions imposed by the Council shall become binding; and shall be met
before the project may proceed. '''
4. J 1�J
All planned development districts approved in accordance with provisions, of this
ordinance in its original form, or by subsequent amendments theretor� shall be
referenced on the zoning districts map, and a list "'of such =planned development
districts, together with the category of uses permitted therein, shall be
maintained in the Community Development Department ",d >,
J , JI ,,
�JJ
f
p,�lUdl,l�JJy l� t
'J
i
Ji
0J
PUD PROCESS FLOW CHART
Pre Application meeting
with planning staff.
Submittal of Application
Packet and Applicable
Fees
Application reviewed and
public hearing scheduled.
Staff
Notification prepared for Reuiewl
newspaper and mailing
list. Sign posted on the
subject property.
%` °' ommisslon f
(f
l
r,
r
Final;,,
' Action and!
Ordnance
prepared
10
8.6 TIMELINE AND EXPIRATION
A. VALIDATION
A PUD shall be validated once any portion of the property has been platted and
recorded or a building permit is approved.
B. ZONING ORDINANCE � '''
Because a PUD is a zoning action approved through City Council, by Ordinance, the
City shall file the ordinance approving the designation of a PUD on ;a tract of land,
with the County Clerk's Office upon platting and recording, ,,,YD
portion of the PUD.
C. EXPIRATION ;'
Or
For any PUD in which there has been no building permit issued nor any "portion of
the property platted after five (5) years since approval -by the City Council, the
PUD shall be considered null and void and shall be brought back before the
Planning Commission and City Council for consideration pnortto``any development
on the property. Upon approval of the PUD by the, City Council, the Administrator
shall transmit in writing the date by which the�PUD,Witi eX`pire._PUD's are approved
with underlying zoning. The underlining zoning of `the site shall not expire, only the
PUD overlay shall expire.
D. CONFORMANCE WITH CURRENT REGULATIONS;,
Expired PUD's shall be required to �rneet the'most recently adopted regulations,
ordinances, and development�standards �,
E. EXTENSIONS
An extension may be granted by the Administrator for PUD's that are nearing the 5
year expiration date. PUD's;,may,�be extended one (1) time for a maximum of two
(2) additional years, provide�Ya letter is submitted to the Administrator asking for
the extensions ho less than,,,two (2) months prior to the five (5) year expiration
date. Said(jette must indicate the following:
t, � Reason for the' extension
2 1 hat there `are no changes to the original PUD approved by the City Council.
3 z ,ected date by which a portion of the PUD will be platted
ftow�v, r `J / J 1
It shall be the developing party or an individual who has legal authority to sign
documents' on their behalf responsibly to ask for and sign the letter of extension. If no
extens,,ion''has been sought and granted, said PUD shall be considered expired. If no
portion of the property has been platted nor any building permit received by the
Community Development Department, within the two (2) year extension period, said
PUD shall expire and a new PUD application must be submitted.
I
8.7 AMENDMENTS
There may be instances when a change or amendment to the original PUD is necessary
or desired. In these situations, the magnitude of these amendments is considered.
There are two types of amendments that can occur with a valid PUD, a major
amendment and a minor amendment. If amendments have been made, then a
determination shall be required as to whether or not said amendments constitute a
major or minor plan change.
A. MAJOR AMENDMENT
A major amendment is described as a significant change that increases the density,
intensifies the use,_redistributes uses, or creates inconsistencies with the
character of the PUD that was initially approved. A major amendment shall
proceed through the entire PUD process as outtined u,in this chapter. The
Administrator shall determine if the changes to thi i PUD meet the criteria for a
major amendment, is an appropriate change, and will matintain the spirit of what
was approved in the original PUD. Modifications from the previously approved PUD
plan shall be deemed by the administrator, to be a major £amendment if said
modifications cause one of the following to occur
1. Increase the total number of dwelling units`by"'iiore than ten percent (10 %);
2. Reduce the amount of common open space by,,,,",,,, ten percent (10 %) from what was
originally approved;
3. Substantially change the location of any or multi - family or non- residential
Example: An approved 100 acre PUD shows 20 acres for office, 10 acres for
commercial, and 70 acres for residential single family. If the amendment
proposes to move the commercial area to another location within the PUD,
then it would be deemed to be a major amendment.
4. Eliminate a proposed use that was approved with the original PUD;
5. Change rhe,�, location of the access points into the PUD or connections to
adjoining residential development. Modifications in the location or design of
1inor'Witreets, cut -de -sacs, alleys, or facilities for water and for disposal of
stgrmwater and wastewater internal to the development shall not be
considered as a major amendment;
6. "tomplete elimination of a recreational feature that was identified in the
approved PUD, without replacing it with an in -kind feature.
B. APPEAL
An appeal from the Administrators decision that the changes to the PUD construe a
major amendment shall be made in writing by filing a notice of appeal to the
Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the Administrators decision. Said
appeal shall be heard a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, at which time
12
the applicant may defend his proposal. Appeals shall not require public
notification.
C. MINOR AMENDMENT
Small changes that still meet the intent of the ordinance, do not increase the
density, are consistent with surrounding development, and do not pose a threat to
the health, safety, or welfare of the City of Owasso can be administratively
approved as a Minor Amendment. Minor amendments may also include relocation
of landscape areas, parking areas, drive aisles, or other similar changes that are
minor in scope.
1. Minor amendments shall be approved administratively", "'Depending upon the
nature of the amendment, the Administrator may be,, require 'the PUD to go
before the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).
8.8 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
1 � 1 ed ftf
The required conceptual plan shall be a renderlt plan, that clearly articulates the
overall concept of the PUD. Figure 8.1 illustrates, an,acceptable conceptual site plan
rendering. The site plan shall include the entire PUD "area, and may include site plans
of smaller areas to provide more speef�c�iy,if the development is large.
1. The site plan shall include, at
ng:
e) Name of the propos " "edl,development,
f) Name and address of the propertytowner and developer
g) Name of the Preparer of the document
h) Graphic scale drawn at a scale no smaller than 1:100, a north arrow, date
of ,preparation, and a legend. Vicinity map outlining the location of the
development in relation to major streets within 1000 feet, schools, and
other, landmarks. The "County where the development lies shall be depicted
i) Legal descnption of the property
j ) Total acreage,�'of the tract, total acreage of the proposed area to be
improved, and acreage of open space
k) 1Locat16man name of abutting subdivisions and City Limit Lines
l) Wooded areas, wetlands, waterways, floodplain and floodway, ponds and
othernatural features
rfi) General location of all proposed streets
n) !Proposed density of the development depicted in gross density figures
� (gross units per acre of the entire development)
o) Location and identification of all land uses within the PUD shall be
depicted. Identification of all amenity locations, detention areas, open
space areas, etc.
p) General location of parking areas for non single- family areas
q) Depiction of any proposed walking trails, pathways, and buffer yards,
including fences
r) Notation on the plan of how wide the buffer yards will be and how they will
be landscaped
13
s) Location and type of amenities provided
r
J,,
Figure 8.7 -1
B. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS TIIIiE` PRELIMINARY PLAT
Should a conceptual site plan r', e' into sufficient detail necessary for
flYlfl„
submittal of a preliminary plat, the,plan may be used as the preliminary plat for the
PUD project. If the"siter plan is to belt'usedas the preliminary plat, it must contain all
of the required elemen&�sfor preliminary plat approval outlined in the subdivision
regulations of,�the City of Owasso t;t If the PUD is approved with a site plan that is
sufficient to be used as a preliminary plat, the applicant may proceed to the final plat
stage. It is not,,reuired that th'e entire development be platted, only the portion
the applicantpntends to , develop initially. Additionally, the conceptual site plan
can be used as,,,,' e ad at site plan for the development if it has TAC comments
that havReteen' add��ressed. If the site plan is unchanged, additional TAC review
R f�76iJlff�'ff P
wtll nobe cequired'.
8.9 DESIGN AND INTENT STATMENT
A. REQUIREMENTS
The design and intent statement shall clearly
development and shall identify key elements
approach over conventional zoning.
1. At a minimum, the design and intent
elements, listed below.
articulate the vision for the proposed
of the project that justify using a PUD
statement shall include some basic
a. Overall project statement of proposed use and intent.
14
b. List of the proposed land uses including residential densities
c. List of all parties involved (applicant, owner, agent, plan preparer)
d. Thorough narrative explaining why the development is appropriate, how it
complies with the PUD ordinance. The applicant should explain how the
PUD is consistent with the goals, purposes, and standards listed in this
chapter.
e. A statement regarding the compatibility of the proposed development with
the surrounding area. The statement should address buffer zones,
transition, screening, types of materials to be used, square footage of
structures, .
f. A table showing how the proposed PUD will differ from current bulk
standards, with an outline of what sections of the zoning ordinance or
subdivision regulations that the PUD seeks relief frorri;,
g. An outline of the covenants that will govern the pro perty and :;information
about the development of a Homeowners Association and how they will
govern the common areas. h;,,
h. An anticipated timeline for development, which may include a phasing
plan.: t
i. The PUD's consistency with the Owasso Land Use Masterl Plan.
Sections 8.90 -8.99 Reserved
1 �
1
f i:J
W
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Requirements Comparison
CITY
PUD Site Plan
Written Statement
of Intent
Neighborhood
Meeting
Amenities
Required
Automatic
Expiration
Open Space
Broken Arrow
X
X
X
X
Tulsa
X
X
X
Owasso (current)
X
X
X
X
X
Owasso (new)
X
X
X
X
X
Bixby
X
X
X
Moore
X
X
X
X
X
Sand Springs
X
X
X
Glenpool
X
X
X
Edmond
X
X
X
Bartlesville
X
X
X
Jenks
X
X
X
X
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT OCTOBER 20112
Mon,fh
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
20101
2011
2012
1 lonuary
54
30
31
22
13
25
15
17
18
19,
2
4:
3 March,
38
75
65
50
25
36
X
46
14
27
4A1011''
5 May
29
31
43
36
60
23
27
30
20
23
19'''
2
7 July,
32
34
27
12
23
24
28
17
20
15
8
9 September
52
64
35
12
17
40
20,
111
12
112
10,
11 Nove;rn6er
35
31
32
13
26
101
13
11
8
12 0
Totds
479
520
sis
336
301
267
-301-3
246
179
497
YTD 393 462 433 307 267 zal 277 236 1611 197
. ..... . .... .... ......... .......
OCTOBER YEAR -TO -DATE DOLLARS
LVU7 zvjv d1v I li /UIZ
31,950,989 33,594,010 19,571,930 24,619 009
. . ...... . . . . . ..... . .... ..
------ - - - ------- - ............... . . . . ..... I
TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
45,000,000 - — ------------
PiKEfErm-1
I
0 1 11111101181w,
2008 2009
'TOTAL 27,364,316 34,767,829'
... . .....
31,8051,9610 21,464,855
CITY OF OWASSO
RESIDENTIAL LOT INVENTORY STATUS
October 31, 2012
SUBDIVISION
# OF LOTS
# DEVELOPED
# AVAILABLE
Burberry Place (6/09)
89
55
34
Camelot Estates (4/07)
139
52
87
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
171
66
105
Champions East (05/08)
66
6
60
Champions West (5/08)
45
3
42
Country Estates III (3/99)
61
58
3
Country Estates VI (11/03)
37
36
1
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
101
93
8
Fairways V (8/99)
71
57
14
Fairways VI (12/00)
42
40
2
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
85
84
1
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
24
22
2
Honey Creek (4/02)
202
198
4
Keys Landing (3/08)
131
99
32
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
114
89
25
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
235
196
39
Maple Glen (12/08)
98
95
3
Maple Glen II (1/11)
93
81
12
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
20
17
3
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
44
43
1
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
58
9
49
Preston Lakes (12/00)
272
243
29
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
147
144
3
Remington Park II (11104)
84
82
2
Sawgrass Park 11 (04/05)
96
94
2
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
31
26
5
Watercolours (12/02)
40
31
9
TOTALS
2596
2019
577
Watercolours (12/02)
The Summit at Southern Links (6/97)
Sawgrass Park II (04/05)
Remington Park II (11/04)
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
Preston Lakes (12/00)
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
Maple Glen II (1/11)
Maple Glen (12/08)
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
Lake Valley IV (5/2010)
Keys Landing (3/08)
Honey Creek (4/02)
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
Falls at Garrett Creek (12105)
Fairways VI (12/00)
Fairways V (8199)
Crescent Ridge (02/08)
Country Estates VI (11/03)
Country Estates III (3/99)
Champions West (5/08)
Champions East (05/08)
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
Camelot Estates (4/07)
Burberry Place (6/09)
CITY OF OWASSO
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
■Lots Developed DTotal Lots I
COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT OCTOBER 2012
Month
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
20019
2010
2011
20112
I January
0
0
1
2
9
4
A
11
1
3
1
2+�
3 March
3
1
2
1
14
2
0
1
3
0
0:
4 A`Al,,'
1' '�
4
5 May
4
1
1
I
1
2
1
d A�J�
7 July
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9 September
2
2,
1
2
1
28
3
0
0
0
0
10 f:
11 November
1
1
3
0
1
11
1
2
2
1
2
Totals
2�3
12
23
23
43
48:
20
91
10
11
7
YTD
22
11
20
22
41
46
1s
7
7
10
7
20,000,000 , OCTOBER YEAR-TO-DATE DOLLARS
glumm
E�
0
2008 --2009 2010
111-.- ------- -----
18,321,12
5, j , �1,1,38VOO_ ?,�,QQ347
M
2011 2012
.............. .
5,380,616 17,296,0001
PERMITS APPLIED FOR IN OCTOBER 2012
ADDRESS
BUILDER
ADD /ZONE
VALUE
A.S.F.
PERMIT#
DATE
12002 E 105 PI N
Simmons Homes
BBP /RS3
$ 144,100
2,620
12- 1001 -X
10/1/2012
10549 N 121 E Ave
Simmons Homes
BBP /RS3
$ 192,005
3,491
12- 1002 -X
10/1/2012
9302 N 93 E Ave
Executive Homes
LBR /RS3
$ 175,230
3,186
12- 1003 -X
10/1/2012
7794 N Owasso Exp
Global Sign
FCB /CG
$ 7,000
64
12- 1004 -S
10/2/2012
9218 N 143 E Ave
Rausch Coleman
CE /RS3
$ 145,640
2,648
12- 1005 -X
10/2/2012
10909 E 109 PI N
Simmons Homes
LVIV /RS3
$ 91,320
1,922
12- 1006 -X
10/3/2012
14499 E 86 St N
Advantage Sign
SCC /CS
$ 1,895
48
12- 1007 -S
10/4/2012
12375 E 86 St N
A -Max Sign
LRS /CG
$ 5,000
50
12- 1008 -5
10/4/2012
9053 N 121 E Ave
City Signs
SF /CS
$ 7,000
172
12- 1009 -S
10/4/2012
10909 N 151 E Ave
Simmons Homes
LVIV /RS3
$ 105,710
1,922
12- 1010 -X
10/4/2012
8525 N 77 E Ave
Old School
CARP /RS3
$ 146,635
2,537
12- 1011 -X
10/4/2012
7605 E 83 PI N
Old School
CARP /RS3
$ 147,620
2,684
12- 1012 -X
10/4/2012
9501 E 91 St N
Terry Davis Homes
LBR /RS3
$ 133,650
2,430
12- 1013 -X
10/8/2012
9506 N 96 E PI
David Smith
LBR /RS3
$ 1,800
165
12- 1014 -X
10/8/2012
11628 E 86 St N
Panterra
TL /CS
$ 75,000
2,204
12- 1015 -C
10/8/2012
7505 E 83 PI N
Winkley Homes
CP /RS3
$ 142,010
2,582
12- 1016 -X
10/10/2012
10907 N 117 E PI
Simmons Homes
MGII /1153
$ 100,815
1,833
12- 1017 -X
10/11/2012
10901 N 151 E Ave
Simmons Homes
LVIV /RS3
$ 105,160
1,912
12- 1018 -X
10/11/2012
12400 E 86 St N
Rainbow Signs
Elem /CG
$ 8,000
32
12- 1019 -S
10/15/2012
12375 E 86 St N
Claude Neon
LRS /CG
$ 9,500
80
12- 1020 -S
10/15/2012
9208 N 93 E Ave
Executive Homes
LBR /RS3
$ 178,145
3,239
12- 1021 -X
10/17/2012
7612 E 84 St N
Landmark Homes
CARP /RS3
$ 120,000
2,612
12- 1022 -X
10/17/2012
7617 E 83 St N
Landmark Homes
CARP /RS3
$ 117,000
2,595
12- 1023 -X
10/17/2012
7413 E 83 PI N
Landmark Homes
CARP /RS3
$ 117,000
2,595
12- 1024 -X
10/17/2012
10704 N 153 E Ave
Capital Homes
LVIV /RS3
$ 82,131
1,555
12- 1025 -X
10/17/2012
10916 N 117 E PI
Capital Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 75,139
1,260
12- 1026 -X
10/17/2012
8421 N 77 E Ave
Landmark Homes
CP /RS3
$ 142,725
2,595
12- 1027 -X
10/17/2012
9540 N Garnett #E
A -Max Sign
CC /CS
$ 6,721
73
12- 1028 -S
10/24/2012
12702 E 87 Ct N
Pool Scapes
CP /RS3
$ 20,000
777
12- 1029 -P
10/24/2012
10910 N 117 E PI
Simmons Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 88,825
1,615
12- 1030 -X
10/29/2012
10902 N 118 E Ave
Capital Homes
MGII /RS3
$ 101,145
1,839
12- 1031 -X
10/29/2012
9025 N 121 E Ave #300
Bannon Const.
SF /CS
$ 450,000
3,000
12- 1032 -C
10/29/2012
21 Single Family
$ 2,652,005
49,672 SgFt
1 Residential Remodel
$ 1,800
165 SgFt
2 Commercial Remodel
$ 525,000
5,204 SgFt
7 Signs
$ 45,116
519 SgFt
1 Pool
$ 20,000
777 SgFt
32 Total Building Permits
$ 3,243,921
56,337 SgFt
C4*j of Owns 111 N. Ma 4%, St. Owasso-, OK 74055
OCCUPANCY PERMITS
NAME ADDRESS APPLICATION OPENING COMPLETE
DATE DATE
OCTOBER 2012
Clean Spot Dog Wash
123 N. Main St.
10/1/2012
10/26/2012
Yes
Barber & Style Shop
11622 E. 86th St. N.
10/15/2012
10/31/2012
Yes
SEPTEMBER 2012
9540 N Garnett
1/22/2012
3/22/2012
Yes
Halloween Express
11680 E 86 St N
9/3/2012
9/3/2012
Yes
Taco Bueno
13502 E 116 St N
6/14/2012
1019/2012
Yes
Memory Lane Tea House
209 N Main St
3/4/2012
9/26/2012
Yes
Eye Mart
9021 N 121 E Ave
9/10/2012
9/28/2012
Yes
AUGUST 2012
JULY 2012
AT &T 7707 N Owasso Exp #7 7/1/2012 7/3/2012 Yes
Boyd Dentistry 8415 N 125 E Ave 11/15/2011 7/20/2012 Yes
JUNE 2012
The Copper Kiln 122 S Main St 6/1/2012 6/29/2012 Yes
MAY 2012
APRIL 2012
Luna De Noche 9500 N 129 E Ave #130 4/5/2012 4/12/2012 Yes
Golden Dragon Taekwondo 13720 E 86 St N 4/5/2012 4/9/2012 Yes
Blue Phoenix 9500 N 129 E Ave # 4/10/2012 4/26/2012 Yes
<<T_13�3CF��SF%
Duffy's
11610 E 86 St N
3/5/2012
3/10/2012
Yes
Life Church
14008 E 96 St N
5/2/2011
3/3/2012
Yes
Edward Jones
9540 N Garnett
1/22/2012
3/22/2012
Yes
Dayana's Hair Salon
11622 E 86 St N
3/2/2012
3/20/2012
Yes
Iglesia Pentecostal
12111 N Garnett
3/22/2012
3/22/2012
Yes
Idol Nails & Spa
12412 E 86 St N
3/14/2012
3/17/2012
Yes
FEBRUARY 2012
Pet Hotel
8355 N. Owasso Exp.
2/1/2012
2/3/2012
Yes
Green Hill Funeral Home
9901 N. Owasso Exp.
2/6/2012
2/16/2012
Yes
Akira Sushi Bar
9455 N Owasso Exp. #E
1115/2012
2/10/2012
Yes
Family Animal Medicine
9200 N. Garnett
2/22/2012
2/22/2012
Yes
Owasso Medical Campus
12455 N. 100 E. Ave. #300
2/29/2012
2/29/2012
Yes
JANUARY 2012
DECEMBER 2011
Dog Daycare & Kennel 8355 N. Owasso Expy 12/1/2011 12/1/2011 Yes
NOVEMBER 2011
Ma's Cafe 11691 N. Garnett Rd. 11/14/2011 11/14/2011 Yes
Boomarang Diner 13720 E. 86 St. N. #190 11/16/2011 11/16/2011 Yes
Creative Clips 12711 E. 86 PI. N. #108 11/15/2011 11/30/2011 Yes
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
City of Owasso Public Works Department
October 29, 2012
E. 86th Street North Widening (from Main Street to N. Memorial Drive)
- Funding for the construction of this project is a result of a "matching grant "; 80%
ODOT funding and 20% City funding.
- ODOT awarded the contract to BECCO of Tulsa, Oklahoma in the amount of
$6.9 million.
- Public Meeting was held on March 15, 2012 @ 6:30 pm at the Bailey Ranch Golf
Course. 8 citizens attended, as well as representatives from ODOT, Tulsa County
and BECCO.
- Official construction time began April 2, 2012. Phase I Road Improvements -
Memorial to Mingo - April 2, 2012 to August 1, 2012. Phase II Road Improvements -
Mingo to Main Street - August 1, 2012 to November 4, 2012.
- Work is progressing on both phases of the roadway; the upper retaining walls are
complete and the lower retaining walls will be completed within the next two
weeks. The west end of the project will be prepared for paving by the end of next
week.
- The contractor is decking the Ranch Creek Bridge. As soon as the decking is
completed, a concrete surface will be placed.
- The Golf Course Bridge is 90% complete and from Main Street to Southern Links
Entrance has been paved on the north side of the road. Traffic will be diverted
from the south lanes to the north lanes after the drainage structures are
completed.
- Staff met with the contractor and construction management firm last week to
discuss a revised completion schedule. We should have that revision by Monday,
November 5, 2012, and will present that to the OEDA at their November 8, 2012,
meeting.
• E. 106TH Street North and Garnett Road Intersection Imbrovement Proiect
- A $750,000 grant from ODOT was approved February 2009.
- On March 24, 2009, Council awarded an engineering design contract to PSA
Dewberry.
- INCOG recommended the project to move from FY 2016 funding to FY 2013
funding.
- Final plan preparation will be completed by November 16, 2012
- Bid letting is scheduled for February 2013.
• Santa Fe Lift Station and Force Main Improvements
- February 2010, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount
of $145,874 to Greely and Hansen Engineering.
- November 2011, OPWA Trustees awarded a construction contract to W.N.
Couch in the amount of $2,636,700. The project is now scheduled to be
complete in October 2012.
- Footings have been poured for the electrical building and the wet well forms are
in place for the contractor to pour the top section. Back filling is complete
around the structure and anticipated completion is now in mid November.
- Electrician has placed all conduit and grade beam has been poured. Hatches
and block outs have been set and wet well roof has also been poured along with
the generator pad.
• Three Lakes Stormwater Channel Improvements
- Project includes widening and shaping of the north /south channel east of US
Hwy 169, from to 83rd Street North southward to the end of the existing concrete
channel.
- The engineering design is being performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 90% complete.
- In April 2012, AT &T mobilized and completed the relocation of their utility.
- Project has been advertised. Pre -bid meeting is scheduled for November 9th and
the Bid - Opening is scheduled for November 20th.
East 106th Street North Water Improvements
- Project includes extending 12" water line from 106th Street North /N. 1 10th East
Avenue to 106th Street North and Mingo Road.
- The engineering design was performed by the City of Owasso's Engineering
Division. Currently, the design is 100% complete.
- City crews have installed 900 linear feet of water line including a creek crossing
and three valves.
E. 76th Street North Widening (from U.S. HMI 69 to N. 129th East Avenue
- In October 2010, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $2,090,000 for engineering, right -of -way
and utility relocation costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the
City of Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund.
- In October 2011, the City received notice that INCOG selected the project to
receive federal funding in the amount of $3,470,000 for construction and
administration costs. A 20% required match will be funded through the City of
Owasso's Capital Improvement Fund.
- In February 2012, ODOT officials informed City staff of funds available in the
Federal Surface Transportation Fund for the planning phase of E. 76th Street North
Widening Project.
- In March, INCOG presented this project to its members for consideration to
receive funding in 2012 for the engineering design. Project was approved by the
Technical Advisory and Transportation Policy Committees.
- In April 2012, the project was approved by INCOG Board of Directors
- Staff is waiting for ODOT to schedule interviews.
• Ranch Creek Sanitary Sewer Improvements
- May 2012, City Council awarded an engineering agreement in the amount of
$175,000 to Kellogg Engineering INC.
- Staff has been granted permission by the Larkin Bailey Trust to enter their property
adjacent to the railroad between 76th Street North and 86th Street North to
determine the feasibility of a potential alignment along the railroad.
- Right -of -way clearing completed. Property owners notified of surveyors entering
the site.
• Garnett Widening (from E. 96th Street North to E. 106th Street North)
- Staff has selected a highly qualified engineering firm for the project and is
recommending approval of the Engineering Services Agreement at the
November 6, 2012 Council Meeting.
• FY 2012 -2013 Street Rehabilitation Project
- May 2012, City Council approved the FY 2012 -2013 project list.
- July 2012, City Council approved the Inter -local Agreement between City of
Owasso and Tulsa County.
- City Council awarded the Street Rehabilitation project to Tri -Star Construction on
October 16, 2012. The crack sealing portion of the project has been completed.
The remaining base repairs, milling, overlay, or fog sealing is to begin by
December 3, 2012.
a LION
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: CHELSEA M.E. HARKINS
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: DIRECTOR'S REPORT
DATE: November 8, 2012
RETAIL & SERVICE DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
• Christian Brothers Automotive construction progresses south of 96 Street N on Garnett
Road.
• Construction progresses on the Coney Islander /Little Caesar's Pizza building adjacent, to
the west of Bank of the Lakes on 86th Street N. These businesses hope to open by the end
of month.
• Clean Spot Dog Wash opened up at 123 N Main Street.
• Eye Mart opened up in Smith Farm Market.
HEALTH CARE UPDATE
• Senior Suites, a full service nursing facility is under construction on land to the south of the
St. John Owasso medical campus.
OTHER
• The Holly Trolley resumes service to the community during the holiday shopping season
later this month and through December. The schedule is:
• Friday, November 23
• Saturday, November 24
• Saturday, December 1
• Saturday, December 8
• Saturday, December 15
• Saturday, December 22
This free service allows shoppers to park their cars and ride the trolley from one shopping
destination to another. The trolley will run from LOAM to 5PM and will be an actual trolley car
from Old Urban Trolley.
The Holly Trolley has twelve stops on its route through Owasso's shopping centers: five at Smith
Farm Shopping Center, two at the Owasso Market Shopping Center, and one stop each at the
Owasso Land, Cornerstone, Owasso Town, Mingo Valley and Tyann Shopping Centers. Look for
the "Holly Trolley Stops Here" located in front of the businesses at each of the shopping centers.