HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014.06.09_Planning Commission AgendaRecord Copy
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
June 9, 2014
6:00 PM
PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: June 9, 2014
TIME: 6:00 PM
PLACE: Old Central
109 North Birch
NOTICE FILED BY: Marsha Hensley
TITLE: Assistant City Planner
Filed in the office of the Owasso City Clerk and posted at the north entrance to City
Hall at 11:00 AM on June 5, 2014.
Marsha Hensley, Assistant City Planne-
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, June 9, 2014 at 6:00 PM
Old Central
109 North Birch
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Flag Salute
3. Roll Call
4. Presentation of the Character Trait of the Month - Endurance
5. Approval of Minutes from the May 12, 2014 Regular Meeting.
6. Annexation #OA 14 -01 It Rezoning #OZ 14 -03, Rejoice Christian School -
Consideration and appropriate action related to a request for the annexation
and rezoning of approximately 15.33 acres in size, from AG (Agriculture)
District to OM (Office Medium) District. The property is located approximately
one -half mile north of the northwest corner of US 169 and East 106th Street
North.
7. Public Hearing - Consideration and appropriate action related to a request to
review and recommendation to the City Council of a draft for a proposed
zoning code text amendment of Chapter 15, Telecommunication Towers and
Small Wind Energy Systems.
8. Public Hearing - GrOwasso 2030 Land Use Master Plan Draft - Discussion of
the draft for the proposed 2030 Land Use Master Plan.
9. Community Development Report
• Report on Monthly Building Permit Activity
10. Report on Items from the May 28, 2014 TAC Meeting.
• Meeting was cancelled
11. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been
foreseen at the time of posting of the agenda)
12. Adjournment
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Monday, May 12, 2014
The Owasso Planning Commission met in regular session on Monday, May 12, 2014 at Old
Central per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin
board at 10:00 a.m. on May 8, 2014.
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER
Dr. Loving called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ITEM 2. Flag Salute
ITEM 3. Roll Call
PRESENT ABSENT
Dr. Paul Loving
Dr. Mark Callery
David Vines
Tammy Laakso
Tim Miller
A quorum was declared present.
STAFF
Marsha Hensley
Daniel Dearing
Bronce Stephenson
Karl Fritschen
Julie Trout Lombardi
ITEM 4. Presentation of the Character Trait of the Month - Discretion
ITEM 5. Approval of Minutes from April 7, 2014 Regular Meeting.
The Commission reviewed the minutes.
Tammy Laakso moved, seconded by Tim Miller, to approve the minutes from the April 7,
2014 meeting. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Callery, Vines, Laakso, Miller
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 6. Rezoning #OZ 14 -02 - Rejoice Christian School - Consideration and
appropriate action related to the request for the review and acceptance
for the rezoning of approximately 42 acres, from AG (Agricultural) District
to OM (Office Medium) District. The property is located on the northwest
corner of US 169 and East 106th Street North.
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 12, 2014
Page No. 2
Bronce Stephenson presented an overview, recommending the Planning
Commission approval of the above rezoning #OZ 14 -02.
Mr. Bill Jacobs (1 1039 N 129 E Ave, The Christmas Tree Farm) was present to discuss
water runoff from the subject property onto his property when the church was built in
2008. He stated that silt fencing was not used and the silt ran into his pond. He will call
DEQ if this is a problem again. Mr. Jacobs requested a copy of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP or SWP3) from DEQ when it is issued to the city.
Tammy Laakso moved, seconded by Dr. Callery, to approve the rezoning from AG
(Agricultural) District to OM (Office Medium) District. A vote on the motion was recorded
as follows:
YEA: Loving, Callery, Vines, Laakso, Miller
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 7. #OPUD 14 -01 — Brighton Park— Consideration and appropriate action
related to the request for the review and acceptance of a Planned Unit
Development with an underlying zoning of RS -3 (Residential Single- family)
District. The general location is one quarter mile north of East 106th Street
North and west of Mingo Road.
Bronce Stephenson presented a overview, recommending the Planning Commission
approval of the above #OPUD 14 -01 for Brighton Park, subject to TAC and Staff
recommendations.
Dr. Loving asked if anyone in attendance would like to speak. Mr. Joe Falleur (11019 N
92 E Ave) asked how the flooding will be addressed. Daniel Dearing explained that the
development can't cause an increase of water. We cannot divert or block water. The
rate of runoff must match or be less. There are instances where you can take property
out of the flood plain by a cut and fill balance. There will not be any lots in the flood
plain after the land is modified.
Mr. Jonathan Vanbeber (10917 N 92 E Ave) stated that the 300' notices were not right. He
knows people that weren't notified and should have been. The yellow zoning sign was
also an inappropriate notice. The sign had bowed due to the recent high winds. He has
concerns with the size of lots, would like them to be larger. Expressed concerns with water
runoff. This plan does not fit with the adjacent properties. He would like to hear the
concerns of the citizens that attended the meeting on May 8th.
Bronce discussed the May 81h neighborhood meeting and what the concerns were. He
also explained that these lots meet or exceed the surrounding lots such as Metro Heights
and Hillside Estates. This property was always planned for residential use in the Land Use
Plan.
David Vines moved, seconded by Dr. Callery to approve the #OPUD 14 -01 for Brighton
Park subject to TAC and staff recommendations. A vote on the motion was recorded as
follows:
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 12, 2014
Page No. 3
YEA: Loving, Callery, Vines, Laakso, Miller
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 8. Final Plat - Hickory Creek- Consideration and appropriate action related
to the request for the review and acceptance of a final plat proposing
fifty (50) lots, in three (3) blocks on approximately 12.14 acres. The general
location is the northwest corner of North 1291h East Avenue and East 661h
Street North.
Bronce Stephenson presented an overview, recommending that the Planning
Commission approve the final plat for Hickory Creek, subject to the applicant addressing
the TAC and staff comments.
Dr. Callery moved, seconded by Tim Miller, to approve the final plat subject to addressing
all Technical Advisory Committee and staff comments and recommendations. A vote
on the motion was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Callery, Vines, Laakso, Miller
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 9. Final Plat - Carrington Pointe I Extended - Consideration and appropriate
action related to the request for the review and acceptance of a final
plat proposing fifteen (15) lots, in two (2) blocks on approximately 2.77
acres. The general location is North 74th East Avenue and East 82nd Place
North.
Bronce Stephenson presented an overview, recommending that the Planning
Commission approve the final plat for Carrington Point I Extended, subject to the
applicant addressing the TAC and staff comments.
Tammy Laakso moved, seconded by David Vines, to approve the final plat subject to
addressing all TAC and Staff comments and recommendations. The vote on the motion
was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Vines, Laakso, Miller, Callery
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 10. Lot Split #OILS 14 -03 - Consideration and appropriate action related to
the request for the review and acceptance of a lot split on property
located on North 140th East Avenue, south of the QuikTrip on SH 20 (Hi-
Point Addition).
Karl Fritschen presented an overview, recommending that the Planning Commission
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 12, 2014
Page No. 4
approve lot split #OLS 14 -03.
Tammy Laakso moved, seconded by Tim Miller, to approve the lot split #OLS 14 -03. The
vote on the motion was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Vines, Laakso, Miller, Callery
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0.
ITEM 11. Specific Use Permit #14 -01 - AT&T - Consideration and appropriate action
related to the request for the review and acceptance of a specific use
permit to allow for a telecommunication tower in a commercial shopping
center on property zoned CS (Commercial Shopping) District. The
property is located at 13710 East 864h Street North.
Bronce Stephenson presented an overview, recommending denial of the SUP due to the
proposal not meeting the defined criteria in the Owasso Zoning Code. He explained that
impact is the height of the structure. The proposed height is 150 feet.
Mr. Mark Kesner with Branch Communications addressed some of the comments from
the staff report. He stated that with the new 4GLT network system, towers are lower but
closer together. He discussed the Owasso Zoning Code cell tower restrictions. He also
stated that they would appeal to the Owasso City Council as a last resort. They would be
agreeable to table the item for next month's Planning Commission meeting if necessary.
Mr. Mike Cooper with A T & T Communications asked to approach the Commissioners.
He explained that A T & T is going through an upgrade at this time. This tower would
improve the dead spots and give greater speed to the area.
Discussion was held regarding tabling the item in order to research other cities and their
requirements on cell towers. Also, give A T & T time to rework some of the problems.
After discussion, David Vines moved to deny the SUP #14 -01, but would entertain a
resubmission that would be closer to Owasso codes and requirements, seconded by Tim
Miller, to deny the SUP # 14 -01. The vote on the motion was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Vines, Miller
NAY: Laakso, Callery
Motion to deny the SUP request carried 3 -2.
ITEM 12. Community Development Report
• Report on Monthly Building Permit Activity.
ITEM 13. Report on Items from the April 23, 2014 TAC Meeting.
• #OPUD 14 -01 - Brighton Park
• Final Plat - Hickory Creek
• Final Plat - Carrington Pointe I Extended
• #OLS 14 -03, Lot Split - A T & T
OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 12, 2014
Page No. 5
ITEM 14. New Business
ITEM 15. Adiournment -Tammy Laakso moved, seconded by Tim Miller, to adjourn
the meeting. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows:
YEA: Loving, Vines, Laakso, Miller, Callery
NAY: None
Motion carried 5 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:45 PM.
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
Date
TO: The Owasso Planning Commission
FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Annexation and Rezoning of Rejoice School Property
DATE: May 6, 2014
The City of Owasso received an application for review and approval of an annexation and
rezoning request for a property to the north of the planned location of the Rejoice Christian
School. The subject property is located west of the west service road area of US169 and north of
E 106th St North.
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Direction
Zoning
Use
Land Use Plan
Jurisdiction
North
AG
Undeveloped
Commercial
City of
Within PUD?
(Agriculture)
Within Overlay District?
US -169 Overly
Owasso
South
OM (Office
School
Transitional
City of
Medium
Owasso
East
AG
US -169
Transitional
City of
A riculture
Owasso
CS
Undeveloped
City of
West
(Commercial
(Planned for
Commercial
Owasso &
Sho in
School
Tulsa County
SUBJECT PROPERTY /PROJECT DATA:
Property Size
15.26 acres
Current Zoning
AG Julsa Count
Proposed Use
OM - Office Medium -
School
Lots /Blocks
N/A
Number of Reserve Areas
N/A
Within PUD?
N/A
Within Overlay District?
US -169 Overly
Water Provider
Washington County Rural
Water # 3
Applicable Pa backs
Storm siren fee of S35 /acre
Streets (public or private)
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Rejoice Christian School is developing a campus along the west side of US -169 just north of E
106th St N. As the vision for the campus has grown, more parcels of land have been obtained.
This annexation request would bring a parcel of land to the north of the planned campus into
City Limits to allow the campus to extend farther north. The City of Owasso can adequately
serve all infrastructure and safety needs for the subject property.
The applicant is also requesting the rezoning of the subject property. Typically, when a property
is annexed into City Limits it is assigned an AG (Agriculture) zoning designation, but as a part of
this application the property is requested to be zoned OM (Office Medium). Assigning this
zoning designation will allow for the planned development of the Rejoice Christian School. The
property is currently undeveloped, but is planned to be the home of the Rejoice Christian School
campus. Rezoning the subject property to Office Medium would allow for the construction and
development of the school campus and would allow the school to develop as an allowed use in
the zoning district. This would allow all future site development approvals to take place at the
administrative level, rather than require special approval by the City Council. The rezoning
request would be in compliance with the Land Use Master Plan, which calls for transitional uses in
the area. The area to the west of the subject property is already zoned for commercial use,
which allows a school by right. After the rezoning of the subject property, all areas of the
planned campus would be zoned appropriately for 'by right' development.
Any development that occurs on the subject property must adhere to all subdivision, zoning,
and engineering requirements including but not limited to paved streets, landscaping, and
sidewalks. The City of Owasso will provide sanitary sewer service.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The Owasso 2025 Land Use Master Plan identifies the subject property and its surroundings as
having a future land use of Transitional. The proposed rezoning to Office Medium will be in
conformance with the Land Use Master Plan, as office uses are allowed in transitional areas.
ANNEXATION COMMITTEE:
The Owasso Annexation Committee met on May 28, 2014 and voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the annexation request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the annexation and rezoning for Rejoice
School.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Area Map
B. Aerial Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Land Use Map
Annexation /Rezoning
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information_ Data provided hereon Is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff forthe most up-to -date information_
Annexation /Rezoning
#FDA -14 -011
752 ft #OZ -94 -03 04/3012014
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff for the most up-to -date information.
Annexation /Rezoning
1" = 752 ft #OA -1401/ 06/0412014 1
#OZ -14 -03
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
please contact Owasso staff for the most up -to -date information.
Annexation /Rezoning
_ #OA- 14011
1 „ - 752 ft 06104/2014 V
#OZ -14 -03
This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy,
Please contact Owasso staff for the most up -to -date information.
TO: Owasso Planning Commission
FROM: Bronce L. Stephenson
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:Zoning Code Text Amendment - Telecommunication Tower Ordinance
DATE: June 9, 2014
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department has been working on an update to the existing
zoning code language dealing with the regulation of telecommunication towers. The City has
had language in place for a number of years, but after an analysis of the existing regulations,
staff has found that Owasso's regulations are significantly stricter than others in the region. Staff
has amended the current regulations to allow for a competitive atmosphere for
telecommunication providers and to ensure quality phone and data service to Owasso
residents.
The attached draft shows strikethroughs for deleted language and underline for added
language. The changes to the ordinance make two (2) major changes to the current
regulations. The first change reduces the distance requirement between towers from one mile
to 1/2 mile. At the time that this ordinance was originally adopted the telecommunication
industry was very different and not only had less carriers, but also had much different needs for
data and cellular coverage. Due mainly to the increasing need for data service,
telecommunication equipment needs to be placed at a higher density to meet customer
demand. Staff finds that 1/2 mile separation does not have a great impact because each tower
has to provide space for at least four (4) other companies to co- locate, reducing the needs for
duplicate towers in an area. The next major change was the required distance from residential
structures. The new language provides for a 2:1 distance to tower height ratio from any
residential structure. The old language required a 3:1 distance separation, but as towers are
traditionally 150 feet and taller, this made finding a location quite difficult. There were other
small changes to increase screening fence requirements and to make a 200 foot tower the
maximum possible, collectively making a much stronger and more competitive set of
telecommunication standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed zoning code
text amendment to the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Text Amendment - Telecommunications Chapter
TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS AND SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS
1510 Definitions
1520 Telecommunication Towers
1530 Small Wind Energy Systems
SECTION 1510 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the
meaning ascribed to them as follows:
1. The term "telecommunications tower" means a structure more than ten feet
tall, built primarily to support one or more telecommunications antennas.
2. The term "telecommunications" means the transmission, between or among
points specified by the user, or information of the user's choosing, without
change in the form or content or information as sent and received.
3. The term "telecommunications service" means the offering of
telecommunications for a fee directly to the public, or to such classes of users
as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities
used.
4. The term "antenna" means any structure or device used to collect or radiate
electromagnetic waves, including both directional antennas, such as panels or
dishes, and onni- directional antennas, such as whips, but not including
satellite earth stations.
5. The term "telecommunications antenna" means an antenna used to provide a
telecommunications service.
6. The term "antenna array" means a structure attached to a telecommunication
tower that supports telecommunication antennas.
7. The term "whip antenna" means an omni - directional dipole antenna of
cylindrical shape that is no more than six inches in diameter.
8. The term "non whip antenna" means an antenna that is not a whip antenna,
such as dish antennas, panel antennas, etc.
9. The term "EIA -222" means Electronic Industries Association Standard 222,
"Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Support
Structures"
10. The term "historically significant landscapes" and "architecturally significant
structures" shall apply to those areas identified as such within the National
Register of Historic Places.
SECTION 1520 TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS
(A) NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUIRED
(1) Permitted By Right - Telecommunication towers are a permitted use in
all CG, CH, IL, IM, and IH if proposed towers satisfy the following
requirements. Telecommunication towers permitted under this
subsection may exceed compatibility and base district height
restrictions.
(a) Aesthetic Protection
Telecommunication facilities shall be so located to ensure that
historically significant landscapes are protected. The views of
vistas from architecturally and /or historically significant
structures should not be impaired or diminished by the placement
of telecommunication facilities.
(b) Setback
Tower shall be a minimum of distance to tower
anyasidential structure Deteted:RS -s
Deleted: or more restrictive district
(c) Height
Tower height, excluding antenna array, does not exceeq 200 feet.
(d) Antenna Array Height
The antenna array does not exceed the tower height by more than
10 feet.
(e) Setback of Guy Wires
All guy wires and guy anchors are setback a minimum of 20 feet
from any property line.
(f) Tower Type
The tower is of monopole design, or one of equal or lesser impact,
if located within 350' of any RS -3 or more restrictive district.
(g) Co-Location
Deleted:I
75 feet, if the tower is at Least
200 feet but Less than 250 feet, from
any RS -3 or more restrictive district.5
4 100 feet, if the tower is at least
250 feet but less than 350 feet, from
any R5 -3 or more restrictive district.A
120 feet if the tower is 350' or greater,
from any RS -3 or more restrictive district.
A telecommunication tower must be designed and built so as to be
capable of use b at least ive 5 wireless communication Deleted: three
providers such as cellular or PCS providers using antenna arrays of
9 to 12 antennas each within 15 vertical feet of each other with
no more than three degrees twist and sway at the top elevation.
The owner of the tower and the property on which the tower is
located must certify to the City that the antenna is available for
use by at least JRur other wireless telecommunication providers - - -- Deleted: two
on a reasonable and nondiscriminatory basis and at a cost not
exceeding the market value for the use of the facilities. If the
property on which the tower is proposed to be located is to be
leased, the portions of the actual or proposed lease that
demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this paragraph
shall be submitted with the building permit application.
(h) Security Fencing
The base of tower is enclosed by an 8 foot opaque security ence_ Deleted: fencing
(i) Compliance with Applicable Regulations
The tower is constructed and operated in compliance with current
Federal Communication Commission and other applicable federal
and state standards.
(j) Neighborhood Impact
The proposed tower location will not cause a negative impact on
any residential neighborhood. In determining neighborhood
impact, the Director shalt consider the opinion of record property
owners within 300', but the Director shall not be bound by such
opinions expressed.
(k) Removal of Tower
Upon the discontinuance of use of any such tower for a period of
thirty (30) days, said tower is to be removed by the
applicant/owner.
(2) Replacement of Existing Poles - Telecommunication towers erected to
replace existing poles are permitted in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(a) The pole replaced is a functioning utility pole or tight standard
within an established utility easement or public right -of -way,
recreational facility light pole, or telecommunication tower.
(b) Replacement tower height, including antenna array does not
exceed:
(1) The height of the original utility, light standard, or
recreational facility light pole by more than 10 feet; or
(2) The height of the original telecommunication tower and
antenna array.
(c) The pole replaced does not obstruct a public sidewalk, public
alley, or other public right -of -way, and
(d) Pole appearance and function, except for antenna, are not
significantly altered.
(3) Placement on Existing Poles - permitted in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(a) Telecommunication antennas are permitted on existing utility,
lighting, telecommunication towers, and sign structures at or
exceeding 50 feet in height.
(b) Provided that the antenna does not exceed the height of the
structure by more than ten (10) feet if a non -whip type or fifteen
(15) feet if a whip type.
(c) Telecommunication antennas located on existing structures are
not subject to the 1 /2 "mil requirement. _ , - Deletes: s o00
-" Deleted: feet
(d) if any additions, changes, or modifications are to be made to the
monopole, the Director of Community Development shall have the
authority to require proof, through the submission of engineering
and structural data, that the addition, change, or modification
conforms to structural wind load and all other requirements of
the current Building Code adopted by the City of Owasso.
(4) Roof Mounted Telecommunication Antennas - allowed on non - residential
buildings in all districts, provided that:
(a) Non -whip antennas do not exceed the height of the building by
more than ten (10) feet and is screened from view from any
adjacent public roadway.
(b) Whip antennas do not exceed the height of the building by more
than fifteen (15) feet and are located no closer than fifteen (15)
feet to the perimeter of the building.
Prior to the installation of a roof mounted antenna, the
Community Development Department shall be provided with an
engineer's certification that the roof will support the proposed
antenna and associated roof - mounted antennas and equipment.
Roof mounted antennas and associated equipment may either be
screened with enclosures or facades having an appearance that
blends with the building on which they are located or by locating
them so they are not visible from an adjacent public roadway.
(5) Building Mounted Telecommunication Antennas of the nonwhip type are
allowed on non - residential buildings in all zoning districts, provided
that:
(a) The antenna is mounted flush with the exterior of the building so
that it projects no more than 30 inches from the surface of the
building to which it is attached.
(b) The antenna's appearance is such as to blend with the
surrounding surface of the building.
(c) Associated equipment shall be place either within same building
or in a separate building that matches the existing building in
character and materials or blends with landscaping and other
surrounding material adjacent to the separate building housing
the equipment. Associated equipment for roof mounted antennas
may be located on the roof of the building if it is screened from
view from any adjacent public roadway.
(6) When an application for a building permit to locate a telecommunication
antenna on an existing building or other structure is made, the
Community Development Department shall be provided with color photo
simulations showing the site of the existing structure with a photo -
realistic representation of the proposed antenna and the existing
structure as it would appear viewed from the closest residential
property. The applicant shall also submit photographs of the same views
showing current appearance of the site without the proposed antenna.
(7) Distance Measurement - distances in this section shall be measured along
a single straight line between the center of the tower base and the
nearest point on any property line of identified historic property or RS_3
or more restrictive district or use. For the purposes of applying
restrictions set forth in this section, "RS -3 or more restrictive zoning
district or use" excludes property that is:
(a) Used as public or private primary or secondary educational
facility;
(b) Used as a college or university educational facility;
Owned by the US, State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, or the City of
Owasso, and not used for RS -3 or more restrictive residential uses;
Used primarily for religious assembly;
Used as a cemetery;
Occupied by non - residential, non - conforming uses; or
Any other site similar to those listed above and determined by the
Director of Community Development to be consistent with the
purposes of this section.
(8) Exceptions and Exemptions
(a) A telecommunication tower that fails to meet the requirements of
this section may be authorized by obtaining a Specific Use Permit
through the Owasso Planning Commission.
(b) Towers erected by a public agency for police, fire, EMS, 911 or
other similar public emergency communication shall be exempt
from the requirements of this section.
(B) SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUIRED
(1) This section is designed to encourage placement of telecommunication
towers in permitted areas. If a proposed telecommunication tower is
not to be located in a permitted by right district, a Specific Use Permit
is required.
(2) All Specific Use Permit requests for telecommunication towers may be so
authorized by the Planning Commission, subject to the following
additional requirements:
(a) Setback from Historical Property
The tower shall not be on, or within 300 feet, or property
recognized as a historical property or a property of historical
significance.
(b) Setbacks General
The telecommunication tower must be a minimum of 200 feet, or _
to l distance to height ratio whichever is-greater, from- Deleted:3
residential structures. Deleted: structures used for
residential purposes
(c) Height
Tower height, excluding antenna array, shalt not exceed:
200 feet.
(d) Array Height
The antenna array shall not exceed the tower height by more than
10 feet.
(e) Guy Wires
Alt guy and guy wires shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from
any property line.
(f) Monopole Required
Any tower within 200 feet of any RS -3 or more restrictive district
shall be of a monopole design, or one of equal or lesser impact.
(g) Security Fencing
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by security fencing at a
height of 8 feet. The fencing shall be opaque.
(h) Compliance with Applicable Regulations
The tower is constructed and operated in compliance with the
current Federal Communications Commission and other applicable
federal and state standards.
(i) Distance from Other Towers
New telecommunication towers must be a minimum distance of
1 /2 mile from any other telecommunication towe,
(j) Removal of Tower
Upon the discontinuance of use of any such tower for a period of
thirty (30) days, said tower is to be removed by the
applicant /owner.
Deleted: (1).75 feet if the tower is
at least 75 feet, but less than 100
feet, from any R5-3 or more
restrictive zoning district.
(2) .100 feet if the tower is at least
100 feet, but less than 200 feet,
from any R5 -3 or more restrictive
district or use
(3) .120 feet if the tower is at least
200 feet, but less than 300 feet,
from any R5-3 or more restrictive
district or use.
(4). Maximum height shall be an
appropriate height set by the Board
of Adjustment, if the tower is in
excess of 300 feet from any RS-3 or
more restrictive zoning district or
use.
_ = \ Deleted: 5,000 feet
Deleted: , untess in a by right district.
TO: Owasso Planning Commission
FROM: Karl Fritschen
Urban and Long Range Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Land Use Master Plan
DATE: June 9, 2014
BACKGROUND:
In December 2012, City staff commenced with the update of the current 2025 Land Use Plan,
which was adopted in 2007. The new plan was dubbed the GrOwasso 2030 Land Use Master
Plan (Plan) and upon adoption will become the new long range planning document for the City
of Owasso. Guiding the update effort was a 28 member steering committee made up of a
cross - section of individuals throughout the community and included several City staff members.
A total of 10 meetings were held with the committee, where members were engaged in
different exercises used to help identify key issues facing the community and ultimately helping
to form many of the goals contained in the current draft document. During the first few months,
staff collected and shared a large amount of data with the committee. This data included
information related to demographics, parks, infrastructure, land use, capital improvement
projects, plans from adjoining jurisdictions, public safety, and economic development. In some
cases individual department directors made presentations regarding issues they are facing
within their areas of operation. All of this information was designed to educate the committee
regarding opportunities and constraints facing the community in the future and stimulate
conversation.
A major focus of the planning process was significant community outreach, which allowed
citizens to express their ideas for Owasso's future growth as well as what they feel are significant
issues. This was accomplished in two ways: the first, a survey placed online between December
2012 and March 2013, to which over 959 citizens responded; the second through a Facebook
page, which obtained 70 followers. The information received from the public outreach was
shared with the steering committee and was also used to further refine the key issues and goals,
as well as develop the Plan map. Additionally, interviews were held with key stakeholders in the
community to discuss future growth and listen to their concerns. These individuals included
members from the real estate and building communities, significant land holders, and Owasso
Public Schools.
After the public surveys, stakeholder interviews, and committee input were completed, the next
major focus of the project was to develop a draft of the Plan map, then document and begin
discussing it with various boards, committees, and the City Council. A PowerPoint presentation
providing details of the Plan was given to the Capital Improvements Committee (CIP) on April
22, 2014 and then to City Council at the work session meeting on May 13, 2014. Additionally, the
Planning Commission discussed the Plan at their regular meeting on April 7, 2014 and at a
special meeting held May 22, 2014. The Owasso Economic Development Authority (OEDA) also
received a presentation on June 12, 2014.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT MAY 2014
Month
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
1 January
31
22
Ti
25
15
17
18
9
75
22
2 February
52
41
14
19
23
29
17
15
26
21
3 March
65
50
25
35
30
46
14
27
27
31
4 April
63
52
30
31
36
31
19
26
26
36
5 May
43
36
60
23
27
30
20
23
19
17
6 June
42
29
27
21
34
23
19
24
19
7 July
27
12
23
24
28
17
20
15
27
8 August
45
28
27
18
28
19
12
15
18
9 September
35
12
17
40
20
11
12
12
28
10 October
30
25
31
15
36
13
10
21
15
11 November
32
13
26
10
13
1
8
11
7
12 December
53
16
8
6
13
9
10
16
11
Totals
518
336
301
267
303
246
170
224
236
127
YTD 254 201 142 133 131 153 Be 110 113 127
45,00(
30,00(
15,00(
12,651,097
TOTAL NEW CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
CITY OF OWASSO
RESIDENTIAL
LOT INVENTORY STATUS
May 31, 2014
SUBDIVISION
# OF LOTS
# DEVELOPED
# AVAILABLE
Burberry Place (6/09)
- 89
88
1
Camelot Estates (4/07)
139
91
48
Carrington Pointe 1 (1/11)
171
145
26
Champions East (05108)
66
8
58
Champions West (5/08)
45
12
33
Country Estates 111(3/99)
61
58
3
Country Estates VI (11/03)
37
36
1
Crescent Ridge (02108)
101
93
8
Fairways V (8/99)
71
65
6
Fairways VI (12/00)
42
41
1
Falls at Garrett Creek (12/05)
85
84
1
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12/05)
24
23
1
Honey Creek (4 102)
202
198
4
Keys Landing (3/08)
131
110
21
Lake Valley IV (5/10)
114
112
2
Lake Valley V (9/30)
78
49
29
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10/07)
235
232
3
Maple Glen (12/08)
98
95
3
Maple Glen II (1/11)
93
88
5
Maple Glen III (5/13)
43
38
5
Maple Glen IV (6/2/14)
92
4
88
Nottingham Estates IV (8/01)
20
17
3
Nottingham Estates V (3/01)
44
43
1
Nottingham Hill (6/09)
58
13
45
Park Place at Preston Lakes
93
29
64
Preston Lakes (12/00)
272
243
29
Preston Lakes III (10/04)
147
144
3
Remington Park 11(11/04)
84
82
2
Sawgrass Park II (04/05)
96
94
2
The Summit at Southern Links (6197)
31
26
5
Watercolours (12/02)
40
31
9
TOTALS
2902
2392
510
Watercolours (12102)
The Summit at Southern Links (6197)
Sawgrass Park It (04/05)
Remington Park If (11/04)
Preston Lakes III (10104)
Preston Lakes (1210D)
Park Place at Preston Lakes
Nottingham Hill (6109)
Nottingham Estates V (3101)
Nottingham Estates IV (8101)
Maple Glen IV (5/2f14)
Maple Glen III (5113)
Maple Glen 11 (1111)
Maple Glen (12108)
Lakes at Bailey Ranch (10107)
Lake Valley V (9130)
Lake Valley IV (5110)
Keys Landing (3100)
Honey Creek (4102)
Falls at Garrett Creek Amended (12105)
Falls at Garrett Greek (12105)
Felnvays VI (12100)
Fairways V (8199)
Crescent Ridge (02108)
Country Estates VI (11103)
Country Estates III (3199)
Champions West (5108)
Champions East (05108)
Carrington Pointe 1(1111)
Camelot Estates (4107)
Burberry Place (6109)
CITY OF OWASSO
0 50 100 150 200 250 du0
■Lots Developed 137otal Lots
MAY YEAR -TO -DATE COUNT
COMMERCIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION MONTH END REPORT MAY 2014
MAY
Month
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
1 January
1
2
9
4
4
1
1
3
1
1
11111
2 February
5
5
0
3
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
3 March
2
1
14
2
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
4 April
3
4
1
0
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
5 May
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
6 June
4
3
4
1
1
2
0
0
2
1
7 July
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
®�/
8 August
3
1
7
3
1
0
0
2
2
0
9 September
1
2
1
28
3
0
0
0
0
0
10 October
0
1
3
4
1
0
0
1
0
4
11 November
3
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
0
1
12 December
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1 .
Totals
23
23
43
48
20
9
10
11
7
11
2
YTD
16
18
30
11
12
7
7
7
5
4
2
MAY YEAR -TO -DATE COUNT
• • /• MAY
.111 111
3,500,000
3,000,000
+ ;•
1
11111
fldf b >>
111111
[en
1111 0
r?L
1,000,000
�i
11 111
�..,
1
1
2014
1
®�/
�
�•. /11
. : /
:: 111
NEW CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
50,000,000
40,000,000
c_
30,000,000
M1 ��
20,000,000
1 111 / 1 /
u
1
i
1 �
2012
2013
1 •
1 .
. .
17,296,000
91
1,885,000
OCCUPANCY PERMITS
NAME ADDRESS APPLICATION OPENING COMPLETE
DATE DATE
MAY 2014
11560 N 135 E Ave #110
4/15/2014
5/6/2014
Yes
Garrett Creek Wine & Spirits
RCB Bank
12200 E 96 St N
10/2212013
5/14/2014
Yes
St. John Medical Office
12455 N 100 E Ave
1/2712014
5114/2014
Yes
APRIL 2014
13321 E 116 St N
10/14/2013
4/30/2014
Yes
Discount Tire
Ledford Properties
425 E 22 St N
1/15/2014
4/4/2014
Yes
Owasso Auto Spa /Dog Wash
9800 N 119 E Ave
2/21/2014
4/14/2014
Yes
MARCH 2014
301 W 12 St
2/25/2014
3/512014
Yes
Lindo Veracruz
FEBRUARY 2014
11211 N Garnett Rd
2/24/2014
2126/2014
Yes
Gramme's Attic
JANUARY 2014
9455 N Owasso Exp #G
10/2212013
1/2/2014
Yes
Envi Spa
Raising Canes
13301 E 96 St N
7/8/2013
1/8/2014
Yes
Simply Nutrition
117B S Main St
1/9/2014
1/13/2014
Yes
St. Johns MOB 3rd Floor
12455 N 100 E Ave
9/30/2013
1/22/2014
Yes
Friendship Baptist Church
14100 E 86 St N
9/11/2013
1/24/2014
Yes
AAA Insurance
11519 N Garnett Rd
9/1612013
1/2812014
Yes
DECEMBER 2013
NOVEMBER 2013
OCTOBER 2013
9018 N 121 E Ave #500
8/19/2013
10/2/2013
Yes
Justice & Brothers
Mum's'N Bum's
104 W Broadway, Suite 4
10/1/2013
10/10/2013
Yes
Needful Things
12701 E 86 PI N
10/1/2013
10/15/2013
Yes
Sam's Club
12905 E 96 St N
9/7/2012
10/24/2013
Yes
Sixkillers Gaming House
7703 N Owasso Exp #109
10/31/2013
10/31/2013
Yes
SEPTEMBER 2013
10098 N 123 E Ave
6114/2012
Yes
Senior Suites
AUGUST 2013
12330 E 86 St N
7/10/2013
8/12/2013
Yes
Arrival Salon
Ledford Properties
425 E 22 St N
3/2/2013
8/1/2013
Yes
IGH Properties
14601 E 88 PI N
7/5/2013
8/29/2013
Yes
Tulsa Technology Center
10800 N 140 E Ave
11/22/2010
8/1/2013
Yes
Sears
9002 N 121 E Ave #600
6/6/2013
8/23/2013
Yes
Halloween City
8751 N 117 E Ave
8/9/2013
8/28/2013
Yes
JULY 2013
403 W 2nd St #107
5/21/2013
7/17/2013
Yes
Dance Studio
LaTorta Chilanga
11501 N Garnett Rd
7/5/2013
7/30/2013
Yes
JUNE 2013
11215 N Garnett Rd #D
6/26/2013
718!2013
Yes
Vaping Kicks Ash
Dollar Tree
12309 E 96 St N
4/16/2013
6/12/2013
Yes
The Children's Place
9002 N 121 E Ave #400
214/2013
6/1212013
Yes
PERMITS APPLIED FOR IN MAY 2014
ADDRESS
BUILDER
ADD /ZONE
VALUE
A.S.F.
PERMIT#
DATE
8433 N 76 E Ave
Denham Homes
CARPI /RS3
$ 170,500
3,100
14- 0501 -X
5/7/2014
7401 E 84 St N
Denham Homes
CARPI /RS3
$ 137,500
2,500
14- 0502 -X
5/7/2014
7399 E 84 St N
Denham Homes
CARPI /RS3
$ 165,000
3,000
14 0503 -X
5/7/2014
8400 N 74 E Ave
Denham Homes
CARPI /RS3
$ 165,000
3,000
14- 0504 -X
5/7/2014
15510 E 87 PIN
Simmons Homes
PPPL /RS3
$ 158,400
2,880
14- 0505 -X
5/7/2014
11125 N 145 E PI
Simmons Homes
LVV /RS3
$ 99,000
1,800
14- 0506 -X
5/7/2014
14610 E 111 PI N
Capital Homes
LVV /RS3
$ 114,950
2,090
14- 0507 -X
5/7/2014
10905 N 121 E Ave
Capital Homes
MGV /RS3
$107 , 580
1,956
14- 0508 -X
5/7/2014
12008 E 110 Ct N
Capital Homes
MGV /RS3
$ 145,035
2,637
14- 0509 -X
5/7/2014
12014 E 110 Ct N
Capital Homes
MGV /RS3
$ 114,950
2,090
14- 0510 -X
5/7/2014
12808 E 86 St N
Phil Narotam
ECC /CS
$ 75,000
1,565
14- 0511 -C
5/7/2014
12041 E 96 St N
Midwest Global
OM /CS
$ 4500
104
14- 0512 -5
5/12/2014
10010 E 94 St N
Baker Pools
FIV /RS3
$ 26,000
423
14- 0513 -P
5/13/2014
12210 E 86 St N
Rodney Acker
ECC /CH
$ 2,362.
14- 0514 -S
5/13/2014
13101 E 96 St N
A -Max Signs
WF /CS
$ 8,000
160
14- 0515 -S
5/14/2014
7605 E 83 St N
Executive Homes
CARPI /RS3
$ 159,115
2,893
14- 0516 -X
5/21/2014
8708 N 155 E Ave
Simmons Homes
PPPL /RS3
$ 193,765
3,523
14- 0517 -X
5/21/2014
11105 N 145 E PI
Simmons Homes
LVV /RS3
$ 111,430
2,026
14- 0518 -X
5/21/2014
10908 N 120 E Ave
Simmons Homes
LVV /RS3
$ 111,430
2,036
14- 0519 -X
5/21/2014
15503 E 88 St N
Simmons Homes
PPPL /RS3
$ 147,400
2,680
14- 0520 -X
5/21/2014
113 W 16 St
Baker Construction
AH /RS3
$ 40,000
440
14- 0521 -X
5/27/2014
425 E 22 St
Ledford Properties
HER/01-
$ 289,745
2,000
14- 0522 -C
5/29/2014
10911 N 121 E Ave
Capital Homes
MGIV /RS3
$ 107,580
1,956
14- 0523 -X
5/29/2014
11105 N 148 E Ave
Capital Homes
LVV /RS3
$ 129,745
2,359
14- 0524 -X
5/29/2014
9901 N 93 Ct N
Reset Restoration
FIV /R53
$ 20,000
2,852
14- 0525 -X
5/29/2014
11590 N 140 E Ave
A - Max Signs
QTCC /CG
$ 5,000
66
14- 0526 -5
5/29/2014
8751 N 117 E Ave
Rainbow Signs
MV /CS
$ 3,000
35
14- 0527 -5
5/29/2014
9455 N Owasso Exp #D
A -Max Signs
TYP /CS
$ 2,500
38
14- 0527 -5
5/29/2014
17 Single Family
$ 2,338,380
42,526 SgFt
2 Residential Remodel
$ 60,000
3,292 SgFt
2 Commercial Remodel
$ 364,745
3,565 SgFt
6 Signs
$ 25,362
451 SgFt
1 Pool
$ 26,000
423 SgFt
28 Total Building Permits
$ 2,814,487
50,257 SgFt
Ciiy of 0wosto-211 N. MaiwSi: Owasso, OK 74055