Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001.03.13_Planning Commission Agendai C°�YL Cpl 96 o-o /) AGENDA PACKET OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION March 13, 2001 a. PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY OF OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION TYPE OF MEETING: DATE: TIME: PLACE: NOTICE FILED BY: TITLE: Regular March 13, 2001 7:00 PM Owasso Community Center Donna Sorrells City Planner Filed in the office of the Owasso City Clerk and posted at the Cedar Street entrance to City Hall at 9:00 AM on the 9'' day of March 2001. �\ Donna Sorrells, City Planner CITY OF OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 13, 2001— 7:00 PM Owasso Community Center, 301 S. Cedar Council Chambers r:Cefs1►17.1 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Consider Approval of the Minutes of the February 21, 2001 Special Meeting. PUBLIC HEARING 4. Preliminary Plat — Bailey Ranch Eastates HI — A request for review of a preliminary plat for Bailey Ranch Estates III, a 278 lot, 81 acre subdivision located east of N. Garnett Road and north of E. 96" Street N. and generally described as a tract of land in the Southwest Quarter (SW /4) of Section 22, Township 21N, Range 14E, Rogers County. (Ward 1) 5. Preliminary Plat — Preston Lakes II — A request for review of a preliminary plat for Preston Lakes II, a 120 lot, 32.49 acre subdivision located east of N. 145h E. Avenue and north of E. 86h Street N. and generally described as a tract of land in the West Half (W /2) of Section 17, Township 21N, Range 14E. (Ward 3) 6. Final Plat — Lakeridge Shopping Center — A request for review of a final plat for the Lakeridge Shopping Center, a 1 lot, 2.89 acre subdivision located west of N. 129" E. Avenue and north of E. 86`h Street N. and generally described as a tract of land in the South Half (S /2) of the South Half (S /2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE /4) of Section 20, Township 2 1N, Range 14E. (Ward 3) 7. Site Plan — Kiddy Kountry — A request for review of a site plan for Kiddy Kountry described as Lot 4, Block 1, German Acres. The subject property contains 40,850 square feet and is located south of E. 116'' Street N. and east of the N. Garnett Road. (Ward 1) 8. Easement Closure —John K. Davis— A request for review of the partial closing of a 25' Utility Easement along the south boundary of Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III and located at 13802 E. 94h Street N. (Ward 1) 9. Proposed Citizen- Sponsored Zoning Code Amendment — Charles Norman — a request for review of a proposed amendment to Chapter 10, Section 1011.4, Off - street parking and loading requirements for medical office facilities. 10. Adjournment. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday, February 21, 2001 Owasso Community Center 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Ray Haynes Charles Willey Bob Randolph Bill Ellison Larry Helton MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Donna Sorrells Marsha Hensley The agenda for the regular meeting was posted in the Owasso City Hall, 207 S Cedar, on February 19, 2001 at 11:50 AM. 1. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson Ray Haynes called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM and declared a quorum present. 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 13, 2001 REGULAR MEETING. Charles Willey moved to approve the minutes of the February 13, 2001 meeting, Larry Helton seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Larry Helton - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 4. Site Plan - Elite Pools - A request for review of a site plan for Elite Pools described as a portion of Lot 2, Block 9, Ator Heights 3rd Addition. The subject property contains 17,705 square feet of the overall 7.35 acres and is located north of E. 86' Street N. and west of the Owasso Expressway. (Ward 2) Donna presented the case to the Commissioners and described the property location. The office trailer will be 1440 and will meet the BOCA building code standards. The parking lot will be paved and guttered and will act as the detention facility. A few comments were made at the Technical Advisory Committee meeting; those items need to be addressed. The applicant, Mr. Tim Smith, was present and made a brief presentation to the Commission. He presented drawings that showed the trailer with a 1600 square foot deck on the front of the trailer and skirting placed around the perimeter with landscaping. He also explained that there would be double wide french doors for the front entrance. Mr. Smith stated that the land is leased on a month to month basis but hopes to be at that location for some time, Mr. Sokolosky wanted flexibility on the lease agreement. There OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION February 21, 2001 Page No. 2 were also concerns from the Commissions with the service road needing some repair work. He explained that at the time of the paving of the parking lot, he would have the asphalt company top off the street in front of the establishment. Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan for Elite Pools subject to the following conditions: 1. All TAC comments are addressed to the satisfaction of the reviewing body. 2. The area containing functional pools and/or ponds shall be fenced and locked while not attended by employees of Elite Pools. Ray Haynes moved to approve the site plan subject to the above TAC and Staff recommendations. Charles Willey seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Abstain Bill Ellison - Recuse Charles Willey - Yes Larry Helton - Yes The motion carried 3 -1. OLS -01 -01 - Tanner Consulting - A request for review of a lot split for property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Owasso Commercial Center III, located north of E. V, Street N. and east of the Owasso Expressway. (Ward 4) Donna presented the item to the Commissioners and described the location of the property. She explained that the property is zoned CS (Commercial Shopping). This lot split would create two lots, to be split from the Best Western property. Then it would be incorporated into the existing Braum's property by a lot -tieing agreement. Mr. Ricky Jones from Tanner Consulting was present to answer questions. Mr. Jones made a brief presentation and explained that this lot would become additional parking for Braum's. The lot is 100' x 160' and the two lots will be tied together. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The Lot - tieing Agreement with the City of Owasso shall be recorded with the Tulsa County Clerk prior to construction on the subject tract. 2. The Lot - tieing Agreement with the City of Owasso shall be recorded with the Tulsa County Clerk prior to the approval of this Lot Split taking effect. Ray Haynes moved to approve the lot split, Bob Randolph seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION February 21, 2001 Page No. 3 Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Larry Helton - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 6. ADJOURNMENT - Charles Willey moved, Bill Ellison seconded, to adjourn the meeting. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Larry Helton - Yes The motion carried 5 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 6:35 PM. Chairperson Secretary Date CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department BAILEY RANCH ESTATES III PRELIMINARY PLAT Staff Report Donna S. Sorrells — City Planner BACKGROUND Bailey Ranch Investment Group L.L.G., applicant, is requesting review of the Preliminary Plat for Bailey Ranch Estates III, an 81 acre, 278 lot proposed subdivision located north of E. 96`h Street N. and east of N. Garnett Road. The subject property is generally described as a tract of land in the West Half (W /2) of Section 17, Township 21N, Range 14E. A location map is shown on the plat for your convenience. The subject property is zoned RS -3/PUD (Residential Single - Family, High Density/Planned Unit Development). ANALYSIS An amendment to the Bailey Ranch PUD and rezoning from RS -2 (Residential Single - Family, Medium Density) to RS -3 (Residential Single - Family, High Density) was approved by the Planning Commission at the August 8, 2000 regular meeting. At that time the Planning Commission approved the PUD amendment subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant should coordinate with staff concerning general design issues prior to platting. 2. A new drainage report should be completed prior platting. 3. Sidewalks be required at time of platting. 4. A maximum of 278 development units be permitted. 5. A minimum 2200 square foot structure be required along the north and east boundaries. A minimum 1700 square foot structure be required elsewhere. 6. A 50' rear yard setback be required on all lots along the north and east boundaries. 7. Lots along the north and east boundaries will have a minimum width of 70'. 8. All conditions of approval of OPUD -12 not specifically revised at this time remain in effect as conditions of approval. The conditions of approval of OPUD -12 not specifically revised by the amendment OPUD -12A are as follows: 1. A subdivision plat be approved by the Owasso City Council and filed with the County Clerk's office prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said covenants shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary. 2. All conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval be met as conditions of the PUD. 3. The minimum side yard of any corner lot be 25 feet. 4. The minimum rear yard setback of any lot within the addition be 20% of the lot depth providing it is not less than 25 feet. 5. All landscape plans for the entrances shall be reviewed and approved by the Owasso Planning Commission and installed prior to the occupancy of any buildings. 6. All water lines installed within the PUD boundary shall meet the City of Owasso's standards. Water pressure shall also meet the City of Owasso's standards. The submitted preliminary plat meets most of the standards set forth in the conditions of approval of both OPUD -12 and OPUD -12A. Specifically, the requirement for 25 foot side yards on all corner lots has not been met. The applicant is aware of the remaining issues of compliance. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the preliminary plat at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. A memorandum detailing the comments received is attached for you information and review. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary subject to the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat be approved by the Owasso City Council and filed with the County Clerk's office prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said covenants shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary. 2. All conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval be met as conditions of the PUD. 3. The minimum side yard of any comer lot be 25 feet. 4. All landscape plans for the entrances shall be reviewed and approved by the Owasso Planning Commission and installed prior to the occupancy of any buildings. 5. All water lines installed within the PUD boundary shall meet the City of Owasso's standards. Water pressure shall also meet the City of Owasso's standards. 6. A new drainage report should be completed prior platting. 7. Sidewalks and acceleration/deceleration lanes be provided for within the text of the deed of dedication. 8. A maximum of 278 development units be permitted. 9. A minimum 2200 square foot structure be required along the north and east boundaries. A minimum 1700 square foot structure be required elsewhere. 10. A 50' rear yard setback be required on all lots along the north and east boundaries. 11. Lots along the north and east boundaries will have a minimum width of 70'. ATTACHMENTS 1. TAC Memorandum 2. Planning Commission Minutes —August 8, 2000 (OPUD -12A) 3. Planning Commission Minutes —March 14, 1994 (OPUD -12) 4. Preliminary Plat for Bailey Ranch Estates III 207 South Cedar PO Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 MEMORANDUM City of Owasso TO: Brian Doyle - Bailey Ranch Investment Group, L.L.C. Dennis Hodo - DLH Engineering, Inc. FROM: Donna Sorrells City Planner SUBJECT: Bailey Ranch III & IV Preliminary Plat DATE: March 1, 2001 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4999 The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed your request for a final plat on the above - referenced property at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. The following comments were noted: 1. Community Development - Block 8 lots are not numbered correctly (should be lots 1 through 9). 2. Community Development - DLH was given copy of PUD Amendment (OPUD -12A) conditions of approval. 3. Public Works - The 10' drainage easement on Lot 8, Block 3 and Lot 26, Block 6 may have to be increased upon further review. 4. Wash. Co. #3 - Project should be phased along the water district boundary as was done with Phase I & H. Need 20' easements. 5. PSO - Would like to see phasing, also. 6. ONG - Continue 20' easement at top of cul -de -sac within Block 6. 7. ONG - Need 20' front utility easements if other utilities will be in the easement. Coordinate with ONG and Wash. Co. #3. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, August 8, 2000 Owasso Community Center 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Ray Haynes Larry Helton Bob Randolph Bill Ellison MEMBERS ABSENT Charles Willey STAFF PRESENT Donna Sorrells Marsha Hensley Stan Ewing The agenda for the regular meeting was posted in the Owasso City Hall, 207 S Cedar, on July 19, 2000 at 2:00 PM. 1. CALL TO ORDER - Chairperson Ray Haynes called the meeting to order at 7:04 PM and declared a quorum present. 2. ROLL CALL CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 11, 2000 REGULAR MEETING. Bob Randolph moved to approve the minutes on the July 11, 2000 meeting. Bill Ellison seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Larry Helton - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes The motion carried 4 -0. 4. Election of Officers Due to the absence of Charles Willey the election of officers will be held at the September Planning Commission's meeting. 5. OZ -00 -08 /OPUD -I2 -A - A & W Land Development - A request for rezoning of a 79.3 acre parcel of land located east of N. Garnett Road and north of E. 9& Street N. The subject property lies adjacent to and north of Bailey Ranch Estates and Bailey Ranch Estates H. Proposed is a rezoning from RS -2 (Residential Single- Family, Medium Density) to RS -3 (residential Single - Family, High Density). The rezoning request necessitates a PUD Amendment of the original PUD -12, Bailey Ranch Estates PUD. The property is generally described as a portion of the NW /4 and the SW /4 of section 17, Township 21 North, Range 14 East. Donna presented the case to the Commissioners. She explained that the applicant has been changed to Owasso Land Trust and described the location of the property. On March 14, 1994 the Planning Commission approved OPUD -12. This request is necessary due to the fact the applicant desires to rezone the property from RS -2 (Residential Single - Family, Medium Density) and RE (Residential Estate) to overall RS -3 (Residential Single- OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION August 8, 2000 Page No. 2 Family, High Density). It has been a two -month process with numerous neighborhood meetings. Donna stated that there were two groups of issues. One group, the existing Bailey Ranch residents, had concerns with the house sizes, park space availability and the correction of drainage in the area. The other group, property owners to the north and east, had concerns with the lot sizes. Since the recent neighborhood meetings were held, no calls have been received opposing the rezoning request. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant should coordinate with staff concerning general design issues prior to platting. 2. A new drainage report should be completed prior to platting. 3. Sidewalks be required at time of platting. - 4. A maximum of 278 development units be permitted. 5. A minimum 2200 square foot structure be required along the north and east boundaries. A minimum 1700 square foot structure be required elsewhere. 6. A 50' rear yard setback be required on all lots along the north and east boundaries. 7. Lots along the north and east boundaries will have a minimum width of 70'. 8. All conditions of approval of OPUD -12 not specifically revised at this time remain in effect as conditions of approval. The following are questions and/or concerns from the public in attendance: Betty Reynolds, 10300 N 122 E Ave - Not everybody is in agreement with the requested revisions, half of the people that were interested were not at the meeting. We did not receive enough notice. It is improbable that the structures will be 2200 square feet. The previous developer did not do what he was supposed to do. We are being lead down a garden path. John Groth, 801 North Dogwood - How will this benefit the people of Owasso? Mr. David Charney, the applicant was present to answer any questions or address concerns. He made a brief presentation stating that the investors of this property had worked hard with the Bailey Ranch residents to do it right and do it well. A meeting was held with Mr. Charney and the counselor that represents Bailey Ranch Estates residents. A seven -point agreement was then taken to the Bailey Ranch Homeowner's Association meeting to be voted upon. A meeting was also held for the residents that are within the perimeter of Bailey Ranch Estates. These property owners displayed a general consensus. Mr. Charney also stated that Owasso Land Trust would honor a 50' setback and a minimum of 2200 square feet and a new drainage study will be issued. : James Zickafoose (President of Bailey Ranch Estates Homeowner Association, Inc.) 9727 OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION August 8, 2000 Page No. 3 E 1209' St No - A lot of time and effort has been put into this project. At first the Homeowner's Association was against this request but when we found out that Mr. Kourtis was the developer and when they agreed to the concessions, we voted unanimously. Joe Miller, 11500 E 101 St No - Pete Kourtis does excellent work, is in favor of the rezoning. Cindy Dewitt, 9900 N 122 E Ave Very impressed with what Mr. Kourtis and Mr. Chamey have done to satisfy surrounding property owners. They have done more than anybody ever would. Ray Haynes stated that Pete Kourtis and David Charney's developments are always well done. He was concerned with the drainage of The Fairways subdivision because he lives in Ator Heights but with a new drainage report being conducted that will be a tremendous help. This rezoing request will help them recover some of the lost since they have to work with the existing drainage problem. Ray Haynes moved to approve the rezoning request for RS -3 (Residential Single - Family, High Density) District and the OPUD amendment, subject to the above staff recommendations and the seven conditions listed in the letter dated August 7, ,2000, (attached) from the Bailey Ranch Estates Homeowner Association. Bob Randolph seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes Larry Helton - Yes Bill Ellison - Yes The motion carried 4 -0. Area Marker - Baptist Retirement Center - A request for review of an ker �igfor the Oklahoma Baptist Retirement Center. The location of4he sign will be the southwegt-corner of E. 76' Street N. and N. 129" E. Aven Donna presented the r nd described ocation. Ordinance No. 424 does not provide parameters limiting the or structure of area markers. Although the ordinance does state that it s to eviewed by the Planning Commission. Mr. David Hall was prese answer questions ade a brief statement. He stated that the sign will re a the existing sign and will be plac the same location. He feels that there s a slight difference of opinion because it is in a r * ntial section. There will no residence, which will face the sign, and the size should not issue. We eed the sign for advertisement purposes. The Baptist Retirement Center is stantly erllino n„r cnndos_ apartments, nursing home rooms, etc. If you limit our markers, .� � � a_�I \III 1 U11 /1_ _ � ►1 ND NUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 14, 1994, 7:00 PM Owasso Community Center 301 S Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Dewey Brown Ray Haynes Tim Rooney Pat Imbriano Charlotte White Charles Willey Gary Wells The agenda for the meeting was posted in the Owasso City Hall, 207 S Cedar, on March 9, 1994. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - Vice Chairperson Charles Willey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and declared . a quorum present. 2. Roll Call 3. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 8, 1994 - The Commission reviewed the minutes of February 8, 1994. Pat Imbriano moved, seconded by Gary Wells, to approve the minutes as written. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Pat Imbriano - Yes Gary Wells - Yes Charles Willey - Yes 6ary-'dith -Yes t�t Wt`s VRfIWw- . The motion carried 4 -0. 4. OPUD- 12 Tuttle & Associates. Inc (1714)- A Request to Rezone a Tract of Land Containing 160.83 acres, More or Less, from AG (Agriculture) District to OPUD -12, Generally Located 1/4 mile North of 96th Street North, East of Garnett Road. The Chair introduced the case and the staff review was given by Mr. Rooney. Several surrounding property owners addressed the Planning Commission regarding concerns over the PUD. The concerns voiced consisted of perimeter lot sizes, drainage, stub streets, and fencing. Pat Imbriano motioned to approve the request to rezone the subject property with the following conditions: Gary Wells seconded the motion. Owasso Planning Commission Minutes of March 14, 1994 Page 2 (1) That the applicants Development Text and Conceptual Development Plan be considered to be the Outline Development Plan as required by the PUD Chapter of the Owasso Zoning Code. (2) That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, single - family detached lots shall meet all the necessary requirements of a typical RS -2 district. (3) That a subdivision plat be approved by the Owasso City Council and filed with the County Clerk's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said covenants shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary. (4) All conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval be met as conditions of the PUD. (5) A detailed drainage report be submitted by the applicant. (6) That within the PUD, the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed 436 units. (7) Sidewalks be provided in all areas of the PUD. (8) That the minimum side yard of any corner lot be 25 feet. (9) That the minimum rear yard setback of any lot within the addition be 20 % of the lot depth providing it is not less than 25 feet. (10) That all landscaping plans for the entrances shall be reviewed and approved by the Owasso Planning Commission and installed prior to the occupancy of any buildings. (11) The larger lot sizes designated along the north and east boundaries of the PUD shall not be altered to a smaller lot size. (12) All water lines installed within the PUD boundary shall meet the City of Owasso's standards. Water pressure shall also meet the City of Owasso's standards. (13) A rear building line of 50 feet be added to the larger perimeter lots. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Pat Imbriano - Yes Gary Wells - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 4 -0. Preliminary Plat - Central Park Addition (2014)- A Request for a e PoCtral Par, Pre a an Ad o he Ci wasso, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Park is Generally Locate n 86th and 96th Streets North, West of 129th East Avenu . The Chair case and the staff review was CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department PRESTON LAKES PRELIMINARY PLAT Staff Report Donna S. Sorrells — City Planner BACKGROUND Preston Lakes L.L.C., applicant, is requesting review of the Preliminary Plat for Preston Lakes H, an 32.5 acre, 120 lot proposed subdivision located north of E. 86`h Street N. and east of N. 145" E. Avenue. The subject property is generally described as a tract of land in the Southwest Quarter (SW /4) of Section 22, Township 21N, Range 14E. A location map is shown on the plat for your convenience. The subject property is zoned RS -2/PUD (Residential Single - Family, Medium Density/Planned Unit Development). ANALYSIS Preston Lakes II is the second phase of the Preston Lakes PUD. One requirement of the approved PUD was that all lots not fronting a cul -de -sac and/or pie shaped will be a minimum of 65 feet in width. There are some lots shown, particularly in the southeast portion of the preliminary plat that do not meet this minimum standard. Staff recommends all lots meet this standard, acknowledging the irregular lots will meet the standard on average. The Preston Lakes PUD was approved for a total of 500 single - family residences. Preston Lakes, the first phase, contained 272 single - family lots. Added to the current proposal of 120 single - family lots, the total lots so far proposed will equal 392, leaving a possible 108 single - family lots available for future development. As provided in the condition of approval for the Preston Lakes PUD, acceleration/deceleration lanes shall be required at each access point to the subject property along E. 86`h Street N. and N. 145`h E. Avenue. This preliminary plat shows one access point along N. 145`h E. Avenue which will require the acceleration and deceleration lanes. A copy of the minutes of the Preston Lakes PUD approval is attached for your information and review. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the preliminary plat at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. A memorandum detailing the comments received is attached for you information and review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for Preston Lakes II subject to the following conditions: 1. All plat covenants shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and the City of Owasso shall be made beneficiary. 2. Acceleration/deceleration lanes shall be provided at the access point along N. 145`' E. Avenue and shall be provided for within the text of the deed of dedication. 3. Sidewalks along all public rights -of -way within and adjacent to the proposed development shall be provided for within the text of the deed of dedication. ATTACHMENTS 1. TAC Memorandum 2. Planning Commission Minutes —August 8, 2000 (OPUD -15) 3. Preliminary Plat for Preston Lakes II i 207 South Cedar PO Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 City of Owasso TO: Brian Doyle — Preston Lakes, L.L.C. Dennis Hodo - DLH Engineering, Inc. FROM: Donna Sorrells City Planner SUBJECT: Preston Lakes H Preliminary Plat DATE: March 1, 2001 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4999 The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed your request for a final plat on the above - referenced property at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. No comments were recorded. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION August 11, 1998 Page No. 7 12. OPUD 15 - Preston Lakes - The applicant, Preston Lakes LLC, proposes a Planned Unit Development on t 254.3 acres, located in the south half of Section 22, T -21 -N, R -14 -E, City of Owasso, Rogers County, Oklahoma, generally located north of E 861' St. N between N 145`s E Ave. and N 161" E Ave. The applicant proposes up to 500 single - family detached dwelling units, 80 villas /townhouses, 450 multi- family units, and t 11 acres of commercial development with a maximum floor area of 217,800 square feet. Theron Warlick presented the item to the Commissioners. In addition to the combination of land uses, the developer proposes a 70.2 acre park. The highest intensity land uses are at the southwest comer of the property. To separate the more intense from the less intense land uses, the developer plans to use the topography as well as man-made buffers. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the PUD at their July 29, 1998 meeting, staff had several comments regarding the development. All of the comments from the TAC meeting have been addressed by the developer. Mr. Warlick reviewed the following staff recommendations: A. That the applicant's Development Text, Text Addendum and Conceptual Development Plan be considered to be the Outline Development Plan as required by the PUD Chapter of the Owasso Zoning Code; B. That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, single - family development shall meet the requirements of a typical RS -2 district; C. That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, multi- family development shall meet the requirements of a typical RM -2 district; D. That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, shopping center commercial development shall meet the requirements of a typical CS district; E. That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, general commercial development shall meet the requirements of a typical CG district; F. That within the PUD, the maximum number of dwellings shall not exceed 1,030 (530 multi- family, 500 single - family); G. That minor transfers (10% increase in a development area's density) of dwelling units from one residential development area to another can occur if a significant change in the character of either development area is not created. H. That all conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval be met as conditions of the PUD; I. That a detailed drainage report be submitted at the time of platting, and certification of such document by an engineer; J. All covenants of any subdivision plat containing property within the PUD shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary; K. That no building permits be issued within any portion of the PUD until all criteria outlined with Chapter 8 of the Owasso Subdivision Regulations are met by the developer; OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION August 11, 1998 Page No. 8 L. Acceleration /Deceleration lanes at each access point to the subject property along the arterial street (two locations on E 86th St No, one location on N 145th E Ave); M. The inclusion of sidewalks along the abutting arterial streets and the interior drives within the proposed development; N. The submittal of detailed landscaping plans to be submitted at the time of site plan review; , O. The Planning Commission reserves the right to prescribe additional buffering, screening and setbacks during the platting process. To the extent that the developer chooses to vary from the outline PUD, the developer can and should expect additional buffering requirements as is necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. Mr. Pittman of Pittman-Poe & Associates presented a brief report of the proposed development. Also, Mr. Dennis Hodo addressed the Commissioners pertaining to drainage in the area. After discussion, Ray Haynes moved to approve OPUD 15 application, subject to the above staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Charles Willey. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Bill Ellison - No Bob Randolph - Yes Larry Helton Yes Charles Willey - Yes The motion carried 4 -1. Site Plan - Schlo 's — A request to review site plan for a proposed deli on a 42 ac at 12551 E 86'" St. N, generally located on E 861 St. N between of the Lakes an ehouse Market. Theron Warlick presen a case. The parking spaces and handicapped spaces (2) are suitable for a building of tr and type. western 13' of the property will be used as a common drive for access to 's, Bank of the Lakes and the proposed shopping center behind the property a no Ray Haynes moved to ap on the motion was r rded Ra aties - Yes ill Ellison - Yes Bob Randolph - Yes tie the Site Plan request, as follows: seconded. A vote CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department LAKERIDGE SHOPPING CENTER FINAL PLAT Staff Report Donna S. Sorrells — City Planner BACKGROUND O.L.T. Commercial Division, L.L.C., applicant, has requested review of a final plat for Lakeridge Shopping Center, a 2.89 acre, one lot subdivision located north of E. 86`h Street N. and west of N. 129th E. Avenue. The subject property is generally described as a portion of the South Half (S /2) of the South Half (S /2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE /4) of Section 20, Township 21 N, Range 14 E. A location map is shown on the plat for your convenience. The subject property is zoned CS (Commercial Shopping). ANALYSIS The subject property is located directly behind and to the west of the existing Bank of the Lakes site. This plat represents the remaining developable land within the immediate area. Sidewalks and acceleration/deceleration lanes shall be required along E. 86th Street N. The provision for these facilities should be noted within the deed of dedication. Although provided within the text of the deed of dedication, no limit of access is shown on the plan along E. 86'h Street N. An emergency siren fee of $16.00 /acre shall be accessed on the subject property. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the final plat at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. A memorandum detailing the comments received is attached for you information and review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Sidewalk along E. 86th Street N. shall be provided for within the text of the deed of dedication prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. 2. Acceleration/deceleration lanes along E. 86`h Street N. shall be provided for within the text of the deed of dedication prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. 3. Limits of access shall be defined prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. 4. The emergency siren fee, totaling $46.24 shall be paid prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. ATTACHMENTS 1. TAC Memorandum 2. Final Plat for Lakeridge Shopping Center 207 South Cedar PO Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 City of Owasso TO: Brian Doyle — O.L.T. Commercial Division, L.L.C. Dennis Hodo - DLH Engineering, Inc. FROM: Donna Sorrells City Planner SUBJECT: Lakeridge Shopping Center Final Plat DATE: March 1, 2001 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4999 The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed your request for a final plat on the above referenced property, at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. The following comment was noted: 1. Public Works — Coordinate with the Fire Department for hydrant requirements. CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department KIDDY KOUNTRY SITE PLAN Staff Report Donna S. Sorrells — City Planner BACKGROUND Joe Murphy, consultant, has requested review of the Site Plan for Kiddy Kountry, located on Lot 4, Block 1, German Acres, south of E. 116th Street N. and east of N. Garnett Road. A location map is attached for your information and review. The subject property is zoned CS (Commercial Shopping). ANALYSIS The applicant has proposed a 5625 square foot day care facility on the subject property. According to the Owasso Zoning Code, the parking requirement for this facility is 1 space per 300 square feet of building floor area. Based on this requirement, the applicant should provide 19 parking spaces, including one handicap /van accessible space. The applicant has provided the required parking. However, the parking shown adjacent to the building does not meet the minimum required dimensions. The applicant has been notified of the inadequacy and has agreed to meet minimum standards. Detention for this facility will be accommodated within swales along the length of the north and south property lines. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the preliminary plat at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. A memorandum detailing the comments received is attached for you information and review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan for Kiddy Kountry subject to the following conditions: 1. All TAC comments shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. All parking shall meet minimum parking standards. 3. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated by means of turfgrass seed or sod upon completion of construction and prior to final occupancy of the building. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan Application 3. Legal Description 4. Site Plan Checklist 5. TAC Memorandum 6. Site Plan for Kiddy Kountry CITY OF SITE PLAN A TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ❑ Retail Commercial ❑ Office ` ❑ Industrial NAME OF DEVELOPMENT O.S.P.# PLAN DATED ZONING OWASSO$25 FEE PD. PPLICATION ❑ Multi - Family Planned (Unit Development Other e�r U 0,69E & Ine LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND ADDR LT DEVELOPER ENGINEER /ARCHITECT SCE Wci 2,0 4!4 ADDRESS ADDRESS - J1rLe;4 D.C' l..JNE PHONE �I�?- Wel - 136 LOT Frontage Average depth Lot area Land area INFORMATION 3/ys )�(� //n�' Q[` /� feet feet [ V\C;_J l,i sq, ff. sq. It. SETBACK FROM Frontlfrom center of street) Rear Sidesjif corner loyfrom center of street.) NEAREST STRUCTURE . O r/ �Q!� feet DO feet f� �G (� i feet 30 ?TeeeP SITE Total floor area Total standard Handicapped Loading berths No. of signs Total sign area INFORMATION 1 ^on.resid:n'jal parking spaces parking. spaces at ft / !� / � J/ S ol RESIDENTIAL No. of single family No. of duplex dwellings Multi- family dwellings Total lira. ability space INFORMATION dwellings 1.Rr.units 20rmorebr.units -s Please submit 18 copies of your site which should show the location, and dimensions of the following: lot boundaries, all easements and r.o.w: s, sidewalks, parking and driveway areas, signs, ingresses and egresses to the public streets, buffer strips, landscaping, and trees. Please submit 2 copies of drainage plans, and any required utility construction lane o v Applicant Signature Date TAC MEETING DATE: ACTION: iS ATTACFIMENT "A" Lot Four ( 4 ) , Block One ( 1) , German Acres , a subdivision in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Less and exept the following described`. ; parts thereof : And a part of Lot 4 , Block 1, German Acres , ;being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at.r:- t a point 386.70 feet North 89 Deg: 58 '52 East of the Northwest comer and on the north line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 14 East ;said point being both the Northeast comer of Lot 4, Block 1, German't Acres and the Northwest'corner of Lot 5 , Block 1 , German Acres;: ;thence South 19 Deg. 58' 42.12 " West a distance of 138.12 feet to the Southeast comer of Lot 4, Block 1 , German Acres ; thence 'South 89 Deg. 58' 41.76 " West a distance of 18.06 to a point; thence North 26 Deg. 13 ' 12.17 " East a distance of 144.81 feet to ai point on the north line of Lot 4, Block 1, German Acres; thence; North 89 Deg. 58'52 " East a distance of 1. 30 feet to the point; of beginning, said tract of Land containing 1258.26 square feet '• of 0.02889 acres, more or less. CITY OF OWASSO P.O. BOX 180 OWASSO, OKLAHOMA 74055 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4997 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SUBMIT THIS CHECKLIST TOGETHER WITH APPROPRIATE APPLICATION FORM WITH ALL MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW. INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL PACKAGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. PLEASE CHECK (X) ITEMS ADDRESSED. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Twenty-Two (22) copies of the Site Plan* Five (5) copies of the following *: • Grading and Drainage Plan • Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan • Utility Plan • Landscape Plan *Plans should be folded to be no larger than 9 "xl2" in size One 8 %" x 11" copy of the following: • Site Plan • Grading and Drainage Plan • Landscape Plan 4—Completed application, $25.00 fee. Owner authorization to proceed with application. Attach copy if applicant is not record owner's agent. SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Indication of the scale (i.e. 1" =100') and bar scale. North arrow. Vicinity Map (does not have to be drawn to scale). Location, dimension and size of all proposed lots. Location of all floodplain boundaries and notation of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) with which the site is associated. A � Location, size and use restrictions for all "No Build" areas. X, _Location and dimensions of required building setbacks and easements. Zoning and land uses on adjacent properties. Location and size of all parking areas and driving and maneuvering lanes. The following information regarding existing streets adjacent to the development site: • Right -of- -way (according to the Owasso Maior Street and Highway Plan) and pavement widths. • Existing, proposed and anticipated street names and classifications. • Existing and/or proposed access points. • Acceleration and deceleration lanes (if required). • Traffic Island and other traffic control devices. The following information on all existing and proposed buildings: • Dimension and square footage. • Building height. • Proposed building elevation • Proposed Use Pedestrian walkways or sidewalks including curb ramps where required. A Location of lighting standards. Location of proposed retaining walls (include detail and cross - section). &4 _Trash from adjacent Residential uses, if applicable. (�. i h t Trash enclosure (include detail). �� Location, height and material of fences. Phasing plan (if applicable). Landscape Plan Plan data table including the following information: • Site area • Building footprint area (total) • Lot Coverage • Parking required • Parking provided Applicant Signature Date City of Owasso 207 South Cedar PO Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Bowline Kiddy Kountry FROM: Donna Sorrells City Planner SUBJECT: Kiddy Kountry Site Plan DATE: March 1, 2001 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4999 The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed your request for a final plat on the above - referenced property at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting. The following comments were noted: 1. Community Development - Parking stalls must be a minimum of 9'x20'. It appears on the plan that the stalls shown on the side closest to the building do not meet this requirement. Curb stops should be used at any parking spaces that do not have curb. The appropriate number of spaces has been shown. Only one handicap /van accessible space is required for this facility. 2. Community Development - all disturbed areas must be revegetated upon completion of construction. 3. Public Works - detention will occur in swales along the north and south property boundaries. 4. PSO - Service will be from pole existing on -site. 5. ONG - Service will be from east. Ey ^55- U tl _ �,_.. _•mac.._ �u _ �Y APPROVED Y: ' DRAWN BY REVISED DRAWING NUMBER CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department EASEMENT CLOSURE LOT 2, BLOCKS, NOTTINGHAM ESTATES III Staff Report Donna S. Sorrells — City Planner BACKGROUND APPLICANT AND STATUS OF APPLICANT: John K. Davis, builder REQUESTED ACTION AND PURPOSE: The applicant has requested the partial closing of an existing 25' utility easement situated along the south property line of the subject property to accommodate future swimming pool construction. LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is approximately 17456 square feet in size and is located at 13802 E. 9e Street N. A location map is attached for your information and review. EXISTING LAND USE: The current zoning on the subject property is RS -2 (Residential Single - Family) and is developed residential. SURROUNDING LAND USE: The subject property is located within and surrounded by Nottingham Estates likewise zoned RS -2. ANALYSIS The applicant has requested a partial closing of the platted 25' Utility Easement to accommodate a proposed pool. The platted easement is unusually large with no apparent requirement for the additional footage. The proposed closing would reduce the easement to the typical 17.5' required. A legal description of the proposed closure is attached for your information and review. No encroachment presently exists. The easement closing was reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee at the February 28, 2001 regular meeting and no comments and/or objections were recorded. The affected utility providers have each signed certificates stating their approval. The certificates are attached for you information and review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the partial closing of the existing 25' Utility Easement located on Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III, as described in the attached legal description. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Letter of Request 3. Legal Description 4. Certificates of Approval Z Li Q / a \ ,,, 1 \ I / 9 •i I NOTTINGH M E TATES IV ` 9 \ m 10 1 1 1 10 \ 67.13__ P.O.B. Z 5 89'31'11' E 567.21' tY o/E •9.65' 175.49' - m 1.32 7.32 sa.n' 219.08 11' U/EU/E 170.00' d m ; 11' U/C (� Z 23304 SF p7�\ • "� u o 12 26425 SF Nw W ( BLOCK 1 / _ y I 18702 SF .� 0 �- \ '5.00' m .t. I. V cis ryh X801 I ^ 13803 Z5,1�,yi J 1h Fa9 30' B/E cl2ctt °ry Wo. o%h o. TpeeTc�'9yTy 17.80' 9.21' I y1 7• ( cry'M1 \)• RTy N89'5 1'111V m u G i 1 6 °y9°a p . ?\$'s.G ^10 f38 r 97.52' o T .BLOCK 5 16'V/E --I \ "• 16617 SF 138p 13804 I aI. ,Vass f 2 hl r 3 I Flo I J* 8 �o = 17456 SF I 16365 SF I� U OI u ti 9a ZS' � 37 i f 730.10, o I 7 U/EJ 20565 SF m 6.70' 102.83' N87'10'01'W S 89'54'03• E JqJ br. 3 ` \ N 'g23 84.26' E 717.6' U/E �� NsaSgJ c` , x 36 a Z� BLOCK �rt18119SF �a 35 \07 £ '22,129 SF a > °' \O\�1 ,r \ 00. S2. S0 F Y 1z.71' 0 34 m Ica -IN 50'R rr \ CD 20149 SF I n 3 O , H 64.87' h n o° N 81'31'37' E # o m N O „ J b r c7e E. 93RD U ° S m ��'�14.5T v CT. t 7sJ m ° S•� g2 e1� \ i V O1 / 20� 6g36Z2 v m •- i f:A: ,<.. 33 'INGHAM ESTATES II , '/'s7fi2 7 °,I 9. John K. Davis, Jr., Homebuilder P.O. Bog 227 Owasso, Ok 74055 Phone # 918- 272 -9457 Fax # 918 - 272 -4006 July 27, 2000 Donna Sorrells Community Development City Planner City of Owasso 207 S. Cedar Owasso, Ok. 74055 Re: Partial Closure of Easement Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III Dear Ms. Sorrells, John K. Davis, Jr. Homebuilder would like to request the City of Owasso to commence the proceedings to vacate a portion of one certain easement located on Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III. The reason for this request is that currently the South utility easement is 25' and conflicts with building plans for the lot. We have made contact with the various utilities including Owasso Public Works and there appears to be no need for an easement of 25' in width at the rear of this lot. We purpose that the easement of said lot be reduced to 17.5'. I am including for your review a copy of the plat of which the lot is located and clearly marked the portion of the lot easement requested to be partially closed. You can reach me at (918) 272 -9457 if you have any further questions or needs. Thank you for your assistance on this matter. Sincerely John K. Davis, Jr. John K Davis, Jr. Homebuilder JOHN K. DAVIS, JR. Homebuilder 272 -9457 February 27, 2001 To: Donna City of Owasso City Planner Subject: Close rear easement. This description is in regards to Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates 3. Subject to close rear easement from 25' to 17.51, We propose to close the North 7.5' of the rear 25' easement of Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates 3, creating a 17.51 easement at the rear of said lot. AhnK.avis, Jr. TOTAL P.01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL G, 6yl s , official representative ofQ4'/BOa4a ar,l ras4A' utility provider within the City of Owasso, hereby certify that we have no objection to the proposed closing of a portion the 25' utility easement located within Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III, Owasso, Oklahoma, Signed: ��_ Date: 3—/-67/ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL official representative of Ong eKmt,.Za > *a utility provider within the City of Owasso, hcreby ccrtify that we have no objection to the proposed closing of a portion the 25' utility easement located within Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates Mjqwasso, Oklahom Signed: atc:�"�! RECEIVED MAR 41 2001 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL I, _I ba1iV La,-? -)— ' official representative of mi 2s papr utility provider within the City of Owasso, hereby certify that we have no objection to the proposed closing of"o tl the 25' utility easement located within Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III, was o, Oklahoma. Z'NE NoR.YH 1'1 -s 9t1:M16F Signed: Vllmt Date: 9-2.-01 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL r� I, K ��/-i.. ai- official representative of I' s utility provider City of Owasso, hereby certify that we have no objection to the proposed closing of a portion the 25' utility easement located within Lot 2, Block 5, Nottingham Estates III, Owasso, Oklahoma. Date: 3.MZFk Pe I-I_r J -241.1 Jµ(ti 2v�C�,J��•^ K. Dc✓;S'Tr. 40 17.5 " a.^^ 9.!5" ,3`7, 1/ r c a'%c. }stn t. f4- 0+ e2Sf.•• . TOTAL P.02 City of Owasso 207 South Cedar PO Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 TO: OWASSO PLANNING CITY OF OWASSO FROM: Donna Sorrells� City Planner SUBJECT: Citizen- Sponsored Zoning Code Amendment DATE: March 9, 2001 (918) 272 -2251 FAX (918) 272 -4999 The firm of Norman Wohlgemuth Chandler & Dowell, on behalf of SJSF Venture, has requested Planning Commission review of a proposed amendment to the Owasso Zoning Code, Chapter 10, Section 1010, Use Unit 11 "Offices and Studios ". Information submitted by the consultant is attached for your information and review. Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the attached documents and set the item for public hearing at a future meeting. e-mail cen @nwcdlaw.com Owasso Planning Commission c/o Ms. Donna Sorrells City Planner P. O. Box 180 Owasso, Oklahoma 74055 Re: SFSJ Ventures - Medical Building -south side East86th Street North, east of North 129th East Avenue Dear Members of the Commission: SFSJ Ventures is ajoint venture between St. John Health System and St. Francis Hospital, Inc., formed for the purpose of constructing medical offices and a clinic on approximately nine acres on the south side of East 86th Street North, east of North 129th East Avenue. The first phase development of the medical offices and clinic will be a two story building containing approximately 32,800 square feet. Under the Owasso Zoning Code, Section 1010, Use Unit 11, Offices and Studios, 1 off - street parking space is required for each 150 square feet of gross building area for medical offices and clinics, and 1 off - street parking space for each 300 square feet of gross building area for general office buildings. The medical office or clinic zoning code parking requirements for several communities in our area are as follows: Claremore Collinsville Jenks Sand Springs Sapulpa Tulsa 1 space per 150 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 250 square feet NORMAN WOHLGEMUTH CHANDLER & DOWDELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2900 MID-CONTINENT TOWER TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103 -4023 CHARLES E. NORMAN TELEPHONE (918) 583.7571 CHRISTINE D. LITTLE JOEL L. WOHLGEMUTH ANGELA FREEMAN PORTER R. JAY CHANDLER CHRIS L. ABERNATHY JOHN E. DOWDELL MARICHIEL A. LEWIS THOMAS M. LADNER 28 2001 TRACI J. QUICK WILLIAM W. O'CONNOR February , NANCY E. CONNALLY WILLIAM D. LAFORTUNE ROGER K. ELDREDGE FAX (918) 554 -7848 e-mail cen @nwcdlaw.com Owasso Planning Commission c/o Ms. Donna Sorrells City Planner P. O. Box 180 Owasso, Oklahoma 74055 Re: SFSJ Ventures - Medical Building -south side East86th Street North, east of North 129th East Avenue Dear Members of the Commission: SFSJ Ventures is ajoint venture between St. John Health System and St. Francis Hospital, Inc., formed for the purpose of constructing medical offices and a clinic on approximately nine acres on the south side of East 86th Street North, east of North 129th East Avenue. The first phase development of the medical offices and clinic will be a two story building containing approximately 32,800 square feet. Under the Owasso Zoning Code, Section 1010, Use Unit 11, Offices and Studios, 1 off - street parking space is required for each 150 square feet of gross building area for medical offices and clinics, and 1 off - street parking space for each 300 square feet of gross building area for general office buildings. The medical office or clinic zoning code parking requirements for several communities in our area are as follows: Claremore Collinsville Jenks Sand Springs Sapulpa Tulsa 1 space per 150 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 200 square feet 1 space per 250 square feet February 28, 2001 Page 2 The average requirement for medical offices and clinics is 1 space per 200 square feet of gross building floor area. Believing the Owasso Zoning Code for parking is greater than is actually required, SFSJ Ventures ( "SFSJ ") applied to the Owasso Board of Adjustment for a variance reducing the numberof parking spaces. The variance was denied on the grounds that no conditions exist with reference to the SFSJ site that are different than for any other medical office building or clinic in the City of Owasso, and that changes in the parking requirement for these uses, if any, should be by amendments to the Zoning Code. SFSJ engaged Traffic Engineering Consultants, Inc., a highly qualified traffic engineering and design firm with offices in Oklahoma City and Tulsa, to research data sources and to review the parking requirements established by the Owasso Zoning Code for medical offices and clinics. After meeting with the Owasso Planning Commission staff, Traffic Engineering Consultants reviewed the parking data and studies of a number of national organizations, including the American Planning Association and the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and prepared a report and recommendations dated February 20, 2001, addressed to Stan Ewing, Director of Community and Economic Development, and Donna Sorrells, City Planner, a copy of which is attached hereto. Traffic Engineering Consultants concluded that the Owasso 1 space per 150 square feet rate substantially overstates the parking spaces required for medical offices and clinics, and especially for buildings with more than 15,000 square feet of building area. The Traffic Engineering Consultants report notes that the Institute of Transportation Engineers average parking rate is 47% higher for medical offices than for general office use, however, the current Owasso rate is 100 percent higher for medical offices compared to general office requirements. Further, the current Owasso parking requirement of 1 space per 150 square feet for medical office use is one -third higherthan the average 1 space per200 square feet rate used by other communities and in the Tulsa metropolitan area. The Traffic Engineering Consultants report concluded that a parking requirement for medical offices and clinics of 1 space per 200 square feet of gross building floor area is reasonable and adequate. February 28, 2001 Page 3 With respect to the SFSJ medical offices and clinic, the current Owasso Code requirement would be 218 spaces. Under the parking rate considered reasonable and adequate by Traffic Engineering Consultants, the requirement would be 164 spaces or a difference of 54 spaces. The additional 54 spaces represents a substantial increase in the land used and the cost of the parking for the new facility. Other medical offices which will be constructed in Owasso will incur the same additional costs of land and construction. SFSJ requests that the Planning Commission consider amending Section 1010, Use Unit 11, Offices and Studios, of the Owasso Zoning Code, and after notice and a public hearing, recommend to the Owasso City Council that the off - street parking requirement for medical offices and clinics be changed from 1 space per 150 square feet of gross building floor area to 1 space for each 200 square feet of building area. In the alternative, the present requirement of 1 space for each 150 square feet of building area could remain applicable to medical offices and clinics with 10,000 square feet or less, and the requested rate of 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of parking area could be made applicable for buildings with more than 10,000 square feet of building floor area. Respectfully. submitted, Charles E. Norman Attorney for SFSJ Ventures CEN /ns Attachment ,,.._ TRAFFIC NGINEERING ONSULTANTS February 20, 2001 Stan Ewing, Director of Community and Economic Development, and Donna Sorrells, City Planner P.O. Box 180 Owasso, OK 74055 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC OR OFFICE Traffic Engineering Consultants, Inc. (TEC) was retained by the St. John Health System to research available data sources and to review the parking requirement rates for medical/dental clinics or offices as established by Section 1010, Use Unit 11, Offices and Studios, of the Owasso Zoning Code. Charles Norman and I met with you on January 4, 2001, to discuss the types of information that might be helpful to the City of Owasso and what data sources might be investigated. This report will summarize and explain the information that we collected. Internet Search for Relevant Data The research began with a thorough Internet search of the organizations and associations that are involved in traffic, parking, and land development. The websites explored were the American Planning Association, Eno Transportation Foundation, National Parking Traffic Engineering Consultants, Inc. 6000 S. Western, Suite 300 • Oklahoma City, OK 73139 • 405.720.7721 • 405.720.9848 Fax 6931 S. 66th E. Ave., Suite 100 • Tulsa, OK 74133 • 918.481.8484 • 918.481.3163 Fax website: tecokc.com Association, Urban Land Institute, International Parking Institute, and the Institute of Transportation Engineers. While all of them had parking information of various types, the American Planning Association and the Institute of Transportation Engineers had the most relevant data. A publication from APA entitled Off - Street Parking Requirements and a publication from ITE entitled Parking Generation were acquired for detailed review. Both sources will be referred to in this report, and copies of selected pages from both publications are included as attachments. Parking Generation (ITE) Attachment 1 consists of pertinent pages from Parking Generation. Page 3 of this attachment is a graph that summarizes 40 parking studies conducted on medical/dental clinics or offices of various sizes in communities of various sizes around the country. It relates "peak parking spaces occupied" versus "gross square feet of building area." The actual data points and the fitted curve equation for this data are shown. On page 4 of this attachment, lines have been drawn to reflect a parking requirement of 1 space per 150 sq. ft. of gross building area (Owasso's current requirement), 1 space per 200 sq. ft., 1 space per 250 sq. ft., and 1 space per 300 sq. ft. The average rate for these 40 studies is 1 per 243 sq. ft., and it is shown on the graph as a dashed line. It is apparent from this graph that for small buildings of 5,000 sq. ft. or less, the rate that is used does not make a large difference in the actual number of spaces required. The differences are all in the single digit range. However, when the building size increases significantly, the differences in the required spaces can be substantial. The additional requirement represents a significant investment for an owner and requires additional land that might be used for landscaping or other uses. It can also be observed from the graph that all of these average rates are well above most of the data points in the study, especially for buildings above 15,000 sq. ft. The 1 per 150 sq. ft. rate far exceeds all data points, except for very small buildings. As the building size increases above 20,000 sq. ft., the 1 per 150 sq. ft. rate substantially overstates the parking space needed for medical/dental office and clinic uses. The graph for the rate of 1 space per 200 sq. ft. includes all data points in the study except for possibly some in the less than 5,000 sq. ft. range. This rate still overstates the need in relation to a vast majority of the data points, but it does not seem unreasonable. The rate of 1 space per 250 sq. ft., while still exceeding most data points, does understate the parking demand for several of the cases. Page 6 of Attachment 1 shows the same type information for general office buildings. In this case the data reflects 207 studies across the country. On page 7 of the attachment a line has been drawn to reflect a parking requirement of 1 space per 300 sq. ft. (Owasso's current requirement for general office buildings). The average rate for this data of 1 per 358 sq. ft. is graphed with a dashed line. In this case the 1 per 300 sq. ft. rate appears to fit the data very well. It is on the high side of the data points, but not unreasonably. In comparing the data for medical/dental versus general office, the ITE average parking rate is 47% higher for medical/dental than for general office. However, the current Owasso rate is 100% higher for medical/dental compared to the general office requirement. Another way to view the comparison is to notice the Owasso parking rate for general office is only 19% higher than the ITE average, but for medical/dental the Owasso requirement is 62% higher than the ITE average rate. Off - Street Parking Requirements (APA) The American Planning Association publication Off - Street Parking Requirements is a compilation of parking requirements from the zoning codes of 127 cities and towns of various sizes from across the country. The pages concerning dental offices and medical offices are included as pages 2 and 3 in Attachment 2 to this report. The most commonly used medical/dental rate in the study was 1 space per 200 sq. ft. Page 2 in this attachment also shows the compilation for general office uses. In this case the most commonly used parking rate is 1 space per 300 sq. ft. Area Communities The following is a listing for your information of the medical/dental office or clinic zoning code parking requirements from several communities in our area: Claremore Collinsville Jenks Sand Springs Sapulpa Tulsa 1 space per 150 sq. ft. 1 space per 200 sq. ft. 1 space per 200 sq. ft. 1 space per 200 sq. ft. 1 space per 200 sq. ft. 1 space per 250 sq. ft. It is our opinion that parking requirements based on gross sq. ft. of building size are much easier to interpret and enforce than those based on numbers of doctors, employees, patron seats, examining rooms, or treatment rooms. Although some communities use these more subjective factors, the majority uses gross sq. ft. as a more simple and more easily understood standard. Owasso has adopted this approach in the current code and we recommend continuing the same method. Summary and Conclusions The current Owasso parking requirement of 1 space per 150 sq. ft. for medical/dental offices is 1/3 higher than the 1 per 200 sq.ft. rate used by many communities across the country and in the suburban Tulsa area. The best parking rate data available clearly indicates that there is a sound basis for medical /dental parking rates in the range of 1 per 250 sq. ft. to 1 per 200 sq. ft., except perhaps in building sizes of less than 5,000 sq. ft. The 1 per 150 sq. ft. rate significantly overstates the parking demand, according to the data, for buildings larger than 5,000 to 10,000 sq. ft., and the overstatement increases rapidly as building size increases. It is our opinion, based on the available data, that a parking requirement rate of 1 space per 200 sq. ft. for medical /dental office use is reasonable and adequate. It is reasonable because it represents a conservative estimate of demand while seeking to avoid an over supply of parking with negative consequences to both the property owner and the community. It is adequate because it is sufficient to satisfy the worst cases in the data available. Even the 1 per 200 sq. ft. rate becomes excessive for medical/dental clinics larger than 40,000 to 50,000 sq. ft. It is also generally accepted that owners of clinics have a vested economic interest in the success of their projects, and adequate, convenient and safe parking is a necessary component of that success. Zoning code parking requirements are usually stated as minimums. Owners can exceed the minimum requirement whenever they believe that is necessary to properly serve their clients and employees. If you have questions about any of the data provided or opinions expressed in this report, please call me. We hope this is helpful information for you as you consider whether amendments or adjustments to the Owasso parking requirement for medical/dental clinics or offices would be reasonable Traffic Engineering Consultants, Inc. By Jon Eshelman, P.E. Oklahoma Registration No. 10253 Attachment 1 (7 pages) Attachment 2 (3 pages) cc: Charles Norman 2nd Edition gg, INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS 117 that provides diagnostic and outpatient care, but Peak parking occurred during the mid - morning and which is not equipped to provide prolonged in -house mid - afternoon hours. 11 f 'I't' d are medlcausurgical care. A ac l t les surveye freestanding, and have their own parking areas. Parking generation data for medical and dental clin- ics and offices were available for sixteen facilities, all located in either CBD's or suburban areas. The facilities surveyed ranged in size from 1,550 to 140,000 gross square feet of building area. The highest rate reported was for the smallest facil- ity surveyed. As expected, the rates reflect a higher parking usage than general offices. Future studies should provide a rate relating to the number of employees in addition to building size. Parking Generation, August 1987 /lnslitule of Transportation Engineers 101 ?/7 MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC /OFFICE (630) Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES Average Range of Standard Number of Average 1,000 GSF Rate Rates Deviation Studies Building Area 4.11 2.22 -9.67 1.39 40 23 w d U U O u) w U d C7 z Y rr a Y w a fH 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA ❑ ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 1.81 RZ = 0.958 DATA PLOT AND EQUATION Parking Generation, August 1987 /Institute of Transportation Engineers 3/ % 102 MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC /OFFICE (630) Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES Average Range of Standard Number of Average 1,000 GSF Rate Rates Deviation Studies Build�23 ng Area 4.11 2.22 -9.67 1.39 40 l/12¢S DATA PLOT AND EQUATION 1/I00 11200 11250 I /3oo 360 but 340 ° w 320 a 300 / 280 260 240 U 220 / a 200 180 Z 160 '140 ° 0 o¢ 120- 100 a_ 80 If 60 ° ° 40 20 t 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA ❑ ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 1.81 R' = 0.958 4/7 Parking Generation, August 1987 /Institute of Transportation Engineers 102 LAND USES: 711 -716 GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING 711 —Less Than 50,000 Gross Square Feet Building Area 712- 50,000- 99,999 Gross Square Feet Building Area 713- 100,000- 299,999 Gross Square Feet Building Area 714- 300,000- 499,999 Gross Square Feet Building Area 715 = 500,000- 999,999 Gross Square Feet Building Area 716— Greater Than 1,000,000 Gross Square Feet Building Area DESCRIPTION The general office building categories provide park- ing rates per 1,000 square feet of gross building area and per employee. Nearly all of the facilities sur- veyed were reported to be located in suburban areas. A few facilities were located in central business dis- tricts. A majority of the facilities surveyed were smaller than 300,000 square feet; many were between 100,000 and 299,999 square feet; a few were larger than 500,000 square feet. All of the facilities which reported the number of employees were smaller than 500,000 square feet. The number of employees per facility was a function of the size of the facility. The number of employees reported ranged from 10 (for a 1,200 square foot building) to 1,150 (for a 400,000 square foot build- ing). PARKING CHARACTERISTICS AND DATA LIMITATIONS Peak parking was reported to occur between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM. The average rate for general office buildings less than 50,000 square feet of gross building area is slightly less than the historic rate which ranged from 3 to 4 spaces for buildings less than 50,000 square feet.' The general office buildings surveyed which were in the 50,000 to 99,999 square foot range exhibited a smal l amount of square footage per employee and very high parking rates. The data for office buildings between 300,000 and 499,999 square feet exhibit an average parking rate of less than 3.0 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. More data are needed to justify the average rate for the size category 500,000 to 999,999 square feet, which is in line with larger office buildings. This need is supported by the range of rates in the sur- veys provided. Future survey data must carefully reflect occupied square footage and the numberof employees. More data are needed for many of the office building size categories. Parking Generation, August 1987 /Institute of Transportation Engineers 103 5/7 GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING (711 -716) - Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES Average Range of Standard Number of Average 1,000 GSF Rate Rates Deviation Studies Building Area 2.79 0.75 -32.93 2.25 207 168 DATA PLOT AND EQUATION 2,000 ❑ o ❑ w n. U 1,500 ° w w ❑ ❑ U a ❑ 1,000 ® ❑ ° ❑ Y q❑ ❑ a ° ❑ nQ ° C3 o ❑ ® U-1 500- a� ❑ o Qt II Ca ° IL ❑ ❑ ❑ E)M ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ° 0 200 400 600 X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA ❑ ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 0.93 Ln(X) + 1.253 Rz = 0.870 Parking Generation, August 1987 /Institute of Transportation Engineers 1� 104 GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING (711 -716) - Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation Number of Studies Average 1,000 GSF Building Area 2.79 0.75 -32.93 2.25 207 168 V35s 2,000 0 w U U 1,500 0 U) w a m Z 1,000 \e n<. Y a 500 93 DATA PLOT AND EQUATION M �u� i i ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑' o ❑ ❑ ❑ sce 11,3001 0 200 400 600 X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING AREA Cl ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 0.93 Ln(X) -I- 1.253 R = 0.870 Parking Generation, August 1987 1Institute of Transportation Engineers 7/7 tan E Museum (See also Art Gallery) One space per each four seats in rooms for public assembly or for each 150 sq.ft. of gross floor area for use by the public, whichever is greater, plus one space for each two employees on shift of greatest employ- ment (Charlotte - Mecklenburg Co., N.C.) One space per 1,000 sq.ft. (Omaha, Nebr.) 1.2 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) One space per 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Fairfax Co., Va.) Newspaper Stand 3.33 spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Night Club One space for each four seats (Durham, N.C.) One space per 50 sq.ft. of area open to the public (Nonnan, Okla.) Nursery or Greenhouse One space per 1,000 sq.ft, of total sales area (Omaha, Nebr.) One space per 1,000 sq.ft. of floor area, plus one space per 2,000 sq.ft. of land area (Lake Forest, 111.) One space per 400 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Orange Co., Calif.) One spaces per 300 sq.ft. of sales floor area (Lexington Co., S.C.) One space per each 100 sq.ft. of retail sales for the first 5,000 sq.ft. and one space for each 200 sq.ft. of retail sales area above 5,000 sq.ft.. Greenhouse sales area: one space per each 1,000 sq.ft. and one space for each 500 sq.ft. of greenhouse sales area above 1,000 sq.ft.. Exterior nursery sales area: one space per each 5,000 sq.ft. of exterior nursery sales area (Albmiarle Co., Va.) Two spaces for every three employees on the maxi- mum shift, one space for every vehicle customarily used in operation of the use or stored on the premises, . plus five spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area of salesroom (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Nursing Home (See Convalescent Center) Office One space per 750 sq.ft. of floor space (Arlington, Mass.) One space for each 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area; 40 percent may be compact car spaces (Aurora, Colo.) One space per 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Plano, Tex.) An office complex of 50,000 sq.ft. or more: one space per 300 sq.ft. of gross leasable area (Addison, Tex.) Four spaces per 1,000 net sq.ft. [minimum]; five spaces per 1,000 net sq.ft. [maximum] (Bellevue, Wash.) Four spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross usable floor area up to 20,000 sq.ft. of gross usable floor area, plus two per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross usable floor area for gross usable floor area more than 20,000 sq.ft. (Long Beach, Calif.) One space per 200 sq.ft. of net leasable area on the ground floor and one space per 300 sq.ft. of net leasable area in the basement areas and on all floors above the first floor (Albuquerque, N.M.) 4.4 spaces for each 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Hilton Head Island, S.C.) One space per 200 sq.ft. (Fairbanks, Alaska) y Office, Denta]_ Two spaces for each examination or treatment room, plus one space for each dentist and other employees ( Montgomery Co., Ohio) One space for each 200 sq.ft. of leasable area, phis one additional space for each 200 sq.ft. of area used as a reception area for visitors (Savannah, Ga.) Offices, Montgomery County, Maryland Y d C 9 G 2/3 19 One space for each 200 sq.ft. of floor area (Gainesville, Fla.) "Tie space for each 100 sq.ft. of area bemarle Co., Va.) Office, Medical One space per 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area if over 10,000 sq.ft., then one space per 200 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Orange Co., Calif.) One space for each 250 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Columbus, Ohio) 4.5 spaces per 1,000 net sq.ft. [minimum], five spaces per 1,000 net sq.ft. [maximum] (Bellevue, Wash.) One space per each 200 sq.ft. of floor area (Bozeman, Mont.) One space per 100 sq.ft. of usable floor area, with a minimum of four spaces, plus one space for each employee (St. Clair Shores, Mich.) One parking space for each 50 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Bonner Springs, Kans.) One space for each four seats provided for patron use (Aurora, Colo.) One space for each employee, plus one space for each examining room (Hilton Head Island, S.C.) Three spaces per treatment room and one for each doctor or dentist (Norman, Okla.) Four spaces per doctor or dentist on duty during +siest shift (Arlington, Mass.) We spaces for each doctor (Albuquerque, N.M.) Six spaces per practitioner (Fairfax Co., Va.) Oil Change Strop Two spaces per service station, plus two per service bay. Service bay or pumping area is not a parking space. (Columbus, Ohio) Outdoor Storage One space per employee on the largest shift (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) Outdoor Theater One space per each four seats (Albemarle Co., Va.) One space per three patrons to the maximum capacity of the facility inclusive of both indoor, if any, and outdoor capability (Lake Co., Ill.) One space per 400 sq.ft. of site area (Omaha, Nebr.) Comment. This is a standard for an outdoor music theater. Park Space equivalent to one percent of the total land area. Parking area available along park roads or private 'wives may be used to fulfill this requirement. t. Louis Co., Mo.) Two spaces per acre (Long Beach, Calif.) One space for each three users at maximum utiliza- tion (Northport, Ala.) 20 Pawn Shop One space per 300 sq.ft. (Omaha, Nebr.) Pet Shop One space for each 300 sq.ft. of leasable area (Savannah, Ca.) Pet Cemetery One per employee (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) Photography Studio One space for each 400 sq.ft. of leasable area (Savannah, Ga.) One space for each 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Durham, N.C.) Five spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. (Lake Forest, 111.) Plumbing and Heating Supply One per 900 sq.ft. (Honolulu, Hawaii) One space per 11000 sq.ft. of floor area, plus one space per employee and one space per each company vehicle, plus one space for each 10,000 sq.ft. of open lot or storage area (Bozeman, Mont.) 3.33 spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of sales and office area, two spaces for every three employees on the maximum shift, plus one space for every vehicle customarily used in operation of the use or stored on the premises (St. Louis Co., Mo.) Police Station (See Fire Station) Post Office One space per employee on shift of maximum em- ployment and one space per 800 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Orange Co., Calif.) One space for each 500 sq.ft. of floor area (Bozeman, Mont.) Space per each 400 sq.ft. of gross floor area, plus one space per each two employees on the shift of greatest employment (Charlotte- Mecklenburg Co., N.C.) One space per 125 sq.ft. of gross leasable area, plus one per employee on the largest shift (Citrus Co., Fla.) Four per 1,000 sq.ft. (Lake Forest, 111.) Printing and Publishing One space per 1,000 sq.ft. gross floor area, or one space per employee, whichever is greater (Leesburg, Va.) One space per 600 sq.ft. (Honolulu, Hawaii) One space for each 200 sq.ft. of leasable area (Savannah, Ga.) One space per two employees, plus one space per each 500 sq.ft. of floor area open to the public, for customer parking, but, in all cases, a minimum of two customer parking spaces (Albemarle Co., Va.) One space per employee (Orange Co., Calif.) Produce Stand Three spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area (Hillsborough Co., Fla.) ',/3 PERMITS APPLIED FOR IN FEBRUARY 2001 ADDRESS BUILDER ADD /ZONE VALUE A.S.F. PERMIT # DATE 11702 E 99 St No Perry Hood Properties BR/PUD 100,800 2400. 01- 0201 -X 2/2/01 9906 N 118 E Ave Perry Hood Properties BR/PUD 100,800 2400 01- 0202 -X 2/2/01 11835 N 107 E PI Morton Homes CE/RS -3 88,200 2100 01- 0203 -X 2/5/01 10907 E 121 St No Central Plains Properties CE/RS -3 86,898 2069 01- 0204 -X 2/5/01 9005 N 100 E Ave American Heartland FW/RS -3 118,062 2811 01- 0205 -X 2/5/01 9910 N 118 E Ave Gibson Homes BR/PUD 100,884 2402 01- 0206 -X 2/5/01 9921 N 120 E Ave Gibson Homes BR/PUD 102,774 2447 01- 0207 -X 2/5/01 14900 E 89 St No Chumley & Assoc PL/PUD 63,630 1515 01- 0208 -X 2/6/01 9410 N 133 E Ave Douglas & Co WL/RS -2 15,000 450 01- 0209 -P 2/6/01 13605 E 92 St No Marathon Homes NE/RS -2 159,390 3795 01- 0210 -X 2/12/01 13085 E 91 Pl No Burd Homes CP/RS -2 119,700 2850 01- 0211 -X 2/12/01 14908 E 90 St No Chumley & Assoc PL/RS -3 64,722 1541 01- 0212 -X 2/13/01 123.05, E 96 St No Radio Shack OM/CS 90,000 2500 01- 0213 -C 2/13/01 13410 E 91 PI No McCarville Homes CP/RS -2 145,992 3476 01- 0214 -X 2/14/01 13418 E 91 St No McCarville Homes CP/RS -2 122,934 2927 01- 0215 -X 2/14/01 12035 N 108 E Ave Strategic Homes CE/RS -3 93,996 2238 01- 0216 -X 2/14/01 12706 E 76 Cir No James Quintus DO/RS -3 6,174 147 01- 0217 -X 2/15/01 11831 N 107 E PI R C Const CE/RS -3 72,030 1715 01- 0218 -X 2/15/01 11834 N 107 E PI R C Const CE/RS -3 72,030 1715 01- 0219 -X 2/15/01 11510 N Gamett TDC Const GC /CS 247,190 63800 01- 0220 -C 2/15/01 12301 E 96 St No Global Signs OM/CS 15,500 100 01- 0221 -S 2/15/01 12718 E 89 St No Friese Pools CEP/RS -3 11,000 416 01- 0222 -P 2/16/01 9210 N 103 E Ave Simmons Homes FW/RS -3 139,398 3319 01- 0223 -X 2/19/01 15201 E 89 Ct No Simmons Homes PL/RS -3 85,050 2025 01- 0224 -X 2/19/01 15200 E 89 Ct No Simmons Homes PL/RS -3 87,486 2083 01- 0225 -X 2/19101 10709 E 118 Ct No Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 93,030 2215 01- 0226 -X 2/20/01 10735 E 119 St No Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 93,030 2215 01- 0227 -X 2/20/01 11826 N 107 E PI Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 81,060 1930 01- 0228 -X 2/20/01 11924 N 108 E Ave Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 81,060 1930 01- 0229 -X 2/20/01 10751 E 120 Ct No Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 81,060 1930 01- 0230 -X 2/20/01 13806 E 94 St No American Heartland NE/RS -2 147,420 3510 01- 0231 -X 2/21/01 10612 E 114 St No Maximum Control HA/RS -3 63,000 1500 01- 0232 -X 2/21/01 13801 E 93 Ct No Greg Wylie NE/RS -2 147,000 3500 01- 0233 -X 2/21/01 208 E 5 Ave Kourtis Properties M &B/IL 1 550,000 19800 01- 0234 -C 2/21/01 206 E 5 Ave Kourtis Properties M &B/IL 170,000 6250 1 01- 0235 -C 2/21/01 9915 N 118 E Ave Perry Hood Properties BR/PUD 109,200 2474 01- 0236 -X 2/21/01 9200 N 130 E Ct H & S Builders CP/RS -2 103,908 2600 01- 0237 -X 2/21/01 10702 E 118 Ct No Home Address Builders CE/RS -3 77,616 1848 01- 0238 -X 2/23/01 10611 E 112 PI No Rice HA/RS -3 3,500 336 01- 0239 -X 2/23/01 11008 E 121 St No Strategic Builders CE /RS -3 90,216 2148 01- 0240 -X 2/26/01 10778 E 120 Ct No Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 81,060 1930 01- 0241 -X 2/26%01 12001 N 108 E Ave Camelot Homes CE/RS -3 95,046 2263 01- 0242 -X 2/26/01 8808 N 152 E Ave Simmons Homes PL/RS -3 93,786 2233 01- 0243 -X 2/26/01 8806 N 152 E Ave Simmons Homes PUBS -3 95,844 2282 01- 0244 -X 2/26/01 8810 N 152 E Ave Simmons Homes PL/RS -3 87,486 2083 01- 0245 -X 2/26/01 8906 N 152 E Ave Simmons Homes PL/RS -3 91,602 2181 01- 0246 -X 2/26/01 10726 E 120 St No Home Address Builders CE/RS -3 77,616 1848 01- 0247 -X 2/26/01 10739 E 120 St No Home Address Builders CE/RS -3 77,616 1848 01- 0248 -X 2/26/01 11927 N 107 E PI Home Address Builders CE/RS -3 79,884 1902 01- 0249 -X 2/26/01 130 So Main St Royce Campbell OUCH 22,000 3200 01- 0250 -C 2/27/01 12021 N 108 E Ave R C Construction CE/RS -3 72,030 1715 01- 0251 -X 2/27/01 15004 E 89 St No Chumley & Assoc PL/RS -3 66,822 1591 01- 0252 -X 2/27/01 9914 N 117 E Ave Gibson Homes BR/PUD 102,774 2447 01- 0253 -X 2/27/01 8905 N 151 E Ave Chumley & Assoc PL/RS -3 64,848 1544 01- 0254 -X 2/28/01 44 Single Family 4,178,790.00 99,495 Sq Ft 2 Residential- Addition 9,674.00 483 Sq Ft 2 Commercial - New 720,000.00 26,050 Sq Ft 3 Commercial - Remodel 359,190.00 69,500 Sq Ft 2 Pools 26,000.00 866 Sq Ft 1 Sign 15,500.00 100 Sq Ft 54 Building Permits $5,309,154.00 196,494 Sq Ft BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2001 Total Fees Building Permits Issued 37 6,517.00 Economic Development 31 4,346.00 Mechanical Permits Issued 35 2,525.00 Electrical Permits Issued 37 2,665.00 Plumbing Permits Issued 43 2,765.00 Recreation Development 23 3,575.00 Sign Permits Issued 1 12.50 Reinspection Fees 0 0.00 Sewer Taps 31 14,000.00 Water Taps 22 11,500.00 Water Meter Deposits 18 900.00 TOTAL PERMITS 278 $48,805.50 NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS FOR THE MONTH Building 80 Mechanical 53 Electrical 83 Plumbing 132 Reinspection 19 Other 0 TOTAL INSPECTIONS 367 CITY OF OWASSO RESIDENTIAL LOT INVENTORY STATUS February 28, 2001 SUBDIVISION # OF LOTS # DEVELOPED # AVAILABLE Bailey Ranch Est (2/95) 118 110 8 Bailey Ranch Est II (6/99) 133 69 64 Barrington Estates (12/96) 127 127 0 Barrington Point (4/94) 41 41 0 Barrington Point II (10/94) 49 48 1 Barrington Point III (8/96) 32 26 6 Bradfords at Silver Creek (2/98) 83 62 21 Brentwood Estates (5/94) 51 49 2 Brentwood Park (2/97) 20 20 0 Brentwood Village (6/99) 64 36 28 Broadmore Heights (10/92) 32 28 4 Camden Park (1/94) 38 36 2 Camden Park II (11/00) 42 7 35 Caudle Estates (10/98) 38 31 7 Central Park (2/95) 45 43 2 Central Park II (7/97) 96 76 20 Country Estates (9/95) 138 138 0 Country Estates 11 (6/97) 193 190 3 Country Estates III (3/99) 61 57 4 Country Estates IV (4/00) 158 88 70 Double Oaks (9192) 90 90 0 Double Oaks 11(8/92) 22 21 1 Double Oaks III (8/93) 63 62 1 Double Oaks IV (11194) 96 96 0 Fairways at Bailey Ranch (8195) 80 77 3 Fairways II (1/97) 84 73 11 Fairways 111 (3/99) 43 35 8 Fairways III Extended (6/99) 104 13 91 Fairways IV (5/98) 69 57 12 Fairways IV Extended (6/99) 22 11 11 Fairways V (8/99) 71 12 59 Fairways VI (12/00) 42 3 39 Nottingham Estates (11/94) 46 45 1 Nottingham Estates II (3/97) 15 11 4 Nottingham Estates 111 (9/99) 23 12 11 Nottingham Estates IV (2/01) 44 1 43 Preston Lakes (12/31) 272 108 164 The Estates at Southern Links (12/95) 23 23 0 The Summit at Southern Links (6/97) 31 21 10 The Village at Southern Links (11/95) 61 61 0 The Willows at Silver Creek (1 100) 84 20 64 Windsor Lake (8/92) 39 39 0 Windsor Lake II (6/93) 40 40 0 Windsor Lake II Ext (10/93) 4 2 2 TOTALS 3027 2215 812 Windsor Lake II Ext (10/93) Windsor Lake II (6/93) Windsor Lake (8/92) The Willows at Silver Creek (1100) The Village at Southern Links (11/95) The Summit at Southern Links (6/97) The Estates at Southern Links (12/95) Preston Lakes (12131) Nottingham Estates IV (2/01) Nottingham Estates III (9199) Nottingham Estates II (3/97) Nottingham Estates (11/94) Fairways VI (12/00) Fairways V (8199) Fairways IV Extended (6/99) Fairways IV (5/98) Fairways III Extended (6/99) Fairways III (3/99) Fairways II (1/97) Fairways at Bailey Ranch (8/95) Double Oaks IV (11/94) Double Oaks III (8/93) Double Oaks II (8192) Double Oaks (9/92) Country Estates IV (4/00) Country Estates III (3/99) Country Estates II (6/97) Country Estates (9/95) Central Park II (7/97) Central Park (2195) Caudle Estates (10/98) Camden Park II (11/00) Camden Park (1/94) Broadmore Heights (10/92) Brentwood Village (6/99) Brentwood Park (2/97) Brentwood Estates (5194) Bradfords at Silver Creek (2/98) Barrington Point III (8196) Barrington Point If (10194) Barrington Point (4194) Barrington Estates (12/96) Bailey Ranch Est 11 (6199) Bailey Ranch Est (2/95) CITY OF OWASSO 0 5 10 +sn— —�D— 250 300 []Total Total Lots ■Lots Developed RESIDENTIAL Building Permits (New Construction Counts) ) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 199 11 23 44' Year to Date 17 9 4 11 15 16 19 19 20 34 so 62 42 46 67 February Year to Date Count m 80 N 60 ....................................... ........ ,.............. ..... ......... ........--- - - - - -- . E a40 ................... _ ........... ............................... ............ ...... ------ ....... 'm a a N a 0 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 February Year to Date Dollars n A $7,500,000 0 u$5.000.000 ........ —' ................. .......... ............ ... ._.. -. .. .... ' $2.500,000 . .. - - -- ... _... . -... -.. U 3 $0 Z 1987 1989 1991 1993 _ 1995 1997 1999 2001 New Construction Dollars Totals for Each Year n c$44.000.000 ................................................................... ............................... 0 $33.000,000 -------- -------------- - - - - -- - - - -- ------ --- ------ - - - - -- ' 0 $22.000.000 .. .............................. .. ........... .. ... ....... .... ' $11.000.000 .. .. .. - . - - _ .. .. .... ..... . ti $0 3 i 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 COMMERCIAL Building Permits (New Construction Counts) Year to Date 4 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 2 0 12 a is 2 Includes Churches, Schools, and Government Facilities February Year to Date Count 15 12 .................................... ................. --- ......... — ... — 9 ................ ...... ................... ....... ------------ ---- ------ -- -- o. 49 6 -- -------------------------- ----------------- ---- ----- ---- -- ---- - - --- - --- 2 3 0 E 0 U 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 COMMERCIAL Building Permits (New Construction Dollars) February Year to Date Dollars 12 o $10,000,000 ................... ............................................................................. .S $8,000,000 - -- - - - - --- .... . . $6,000,000 .................................................................................................. ... $4,000,000 ---------------------------------- ......... 11.1 ........... ;— ----------- $2,000,000 -------------- .... 0 $0 ............ z 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 New Construction Dollars Totals for Each Year 2 0 $40,000.000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 $32,000,000 --- ------- ---------- -- ---- -- -------- ----------- ----- ----- -------- -- ----- ---- $24.000,000 $16,000,000 ... .............. ......... ........................ .......... ........... . . VC; $8,000,000 - -- --- ------- -- -- ---- $0 z 3.1 1987 1989 , 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 0 OCCUPANCY PERMITS NAME ADDRESS STATUS APPLICATION OPENING COMPLETE DATE DATE NOVEMBER 2000 11/8/00 Avonlea Cottage 425 E 22 St No OHS Auditorium 12901 E 86 St No Top Shelf Models, L.L.C. 117 -B South Main K C Coneys 12802 E 86 St No Victory Auto Sales 11400 No Garnett Rd DECEMBER 2000 New 11/8/00 11/13/00 Yes New 11/13/00 11/14/00 Yes New 11/17/00 11/24/00 No Relocate 11/27/00 12/1/00 Yes New 11/29/00 12/25/00 Yes Owasso Banquet Hall 302 E 5th, Unit I New Sun Bums 12806 -C E. 86 PI No New Cafe Santa Fe 8529 N 129 E Ave New Miss Jackie's Gifts 126 So Main St New Office Depot 12211 E 96 St No New Cherokee Nation Authority 8555 N 117 E Ave,103 &104 New The Herbal Lady 9220 N Garnett, #E New JANUARY 2001 1215100 Coralstone Learning Center 8520 N 129 E Ave Premier Performance Group 8555 N 117 E Ave Victory Energy Operations 302 E 5th Ave, #D Word of Faith 9100 N Garnett, #K Nu -Image 423 E 2nd Ave Holiday Inn Express 7551 N Owasso Exp Faith Lutheran Church 9222 N Garnett FEBRUARY 2001 Aztec Business Services 8263 Owasso Exp #E Atwoods 11510 N Garnett Rd Dirty Dawg Carwash 10950 E 116 St No Owasso Veterinary Clinic 8811 Owasso Exp 12/1/00 1215100 No 12/6/00 11/20/00 Yes 12/5/00 1/15/01 Yes 12/7100 1/2/01 No 12/8/00 12/14/00 Yes 12/18/00 12/18/00 Yes 12/19/00 12/20100 Yes New 1/4/01 2/15/01 Yes New 1/4/01 311/01 Yes New 1/5/01 1/12/01 Yes New 114/01 12/23/00 Yes Relocate 1/8/01 1/9/01 Yes New 1/8/01 1/11/01 Yes New 1/29/01 2117/01 Yes New 2/14/01 3115/01 Yes New 2/15/01 4/1/01 No New 2/14/01 6/1/01 No New 2/26/01 315/01 Yes