Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994.05.10_Planning Commission AgendaCOPY FOR RECORDS AGENDA PACKET OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 10, 1994 PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION TYPE OF MEETING: Regular DATE: May 10, 1994 TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: Owasso Community Center NOTICE FILED BY: Timothy Rooney TITLE: City Planner Filed in the office of the Owasso City Clerk at 3:00 PM on May 2, 1994. Timothy Rooney, Q Planner OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, May 10, 1994 7:00 PM Owasso Community Center, 301 S. Cedar AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call Consider Approval of the Minutes of April 12, 1994 Regular Meeting. Site Plan Review - Pete Kourtis - A Request for a Site Plan Review of Kourds Office Center, Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Elm Creek Commercial Corner. 5. OZ -9402 - Elaine Parmley (3114) - A Request to Rezone a Tract of Land Located in Section 31, T21N, R14E from RS -3 (Residential Single - Family High Density) to CG (Commercial General). The Subject Property is More Particularly Described as Lots 3 & 4, Block 33, Owasso Original Town Addition and is Generally Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Main Street and Fourth Avenue. 6. OZ -9403 - City of Owasso (3114) - A Request to Rezone a Tract of Land Located in the NE /4 of Section 31, T21N, R14E from an AG (Agricultural) and RM -1 (Residential Multi- Family Low Density) districts to IL (Industrial Light). The General Location of the Subject Property is Directly South of Cedarcrest Apartments. 7. Preliminary Plat - Bailey Ranch Estates Phase I (1714) - A Request for a Review of a Preliminary Plat for Bailey Ranch Estates, an Addition to the City of Owasso, Generally Located in the W/2 of Section 17, T21N, R14E of the I.B.M., Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The Subject Property would Contain 118 Lots on a 40.64 Acre Area. Owasso Planning Commission AGENDA May 10, 1994 8. Final Plat - Double Oaks Extended - A Request for a Review of a Final Plat for Double Oaks Extended, an Addition to the City of Owasso, Located in Section 29, T21N, R14E of the I.B.M., Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The Subject Property would Contain 95 Lots on a 29.32 Acre Area. 9. Final Plat - Central Park - A Request for a Review of a Final Plat for Central Park Addition, an Addition to the City of Owasso, Located within the E/2 of Section 20, T21N, R14E of the I.B.M., Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The Subject Property would Contain 44 Lots on a 15.86 Acre Area. 10. Final Plat - Nottingham Estates - A Request for a Review of the Final Plat for Nottingham Estates, an Addition to the City of Owasso, Located within the SE/4 of the NW/4 of Section 31, 721N, R14E of the I.B.M., Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The Subject Property would contain 46 Lots on a 26.49 Acre Area. 11. New Business. 12. Report on Planning Items Previously Forwarded to City Council. 13. Discussion of Development In and Near Owasso. 14. Adjournment. OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday April 12, 1994, 7:00 PM Owasso Community Center 301 S Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma MEMBERS PRESENT Dewey Brown Pat Imbriano Charles Willey Gary Wells Ray Haynes MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Tim Rooney Charlotte White The agenda for the meeting was posted in the Owasso City Hall, 207 S Cedar, on Thursday April 7, 1994. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - Chairperson Ray Haynes called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and declared a quorum present. 2. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 14, 1994 - The Commission reviewed the minutes of March 14, 1994. Charles Willey moved, seconded by Pat Imbriano, to approve the minutes as written. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Charles Willey - Yes Pat Imbriano - Yes Gary Wells - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Ray Haynes- Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 3. Site Plan Review - Elm Creek Mini Storage - A Request for a review of a site plan for Elm Creek Mini Storage to be located on Lot 5, Block 2, Elm Creek Commercial Corner Amended; further described as 8502 N. 128th East Avenue. The Chair introduced the case and the staff review was given by Mr. Rooney. The Owasso Planning Commission previously reviewed a site plan for Owasso mini - storage in November of 1991. At that time, the Planning Commission approved the submitted site plan with the understanding that the property would develop in phases and the Planning Commission would view an additional site plan at a later time. The site plan was reviewed at the Technical Advisory Committee meeting and all corrections from that meeting have been made. Ray Haynes moved to approve the site plan for Elm Creek Mini Storage, seconded by Dewey Owasso Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1994 Page 2 Brown. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Ray Haynes - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Gary Wells - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Ray Haynes - Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 4. Preliminary Plat - Double Oaks Extended- A Request for a Review of a preliminary plat for Double Oaks Extended, an addition to the City of Owasso located in Section 29, 721N, R14E of the I.B. & M., Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The Chair introduced the case and the staff review was given by Mr. Rooney. The preliminary plat for Double Oaks Extended was reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee at the March 30, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the plat was reviewed by the area utility representatives with several easements being requested to be added to the plat. In addition to the utility companies, staff also provided the applicant with a list of corrections to be made to the plat. All items requested by the utility companies, as well as city staff have been included on the plat. Gary Wells moved to approve the preliminary plat for Double Oaks Extended, seconded by Pat Imbriano. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Gary Wells - Yes Pat Imbriano - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Charles Willey - Yes Ray Haynes- Yes The motion carried 5 -0. 5. New Business. None Owasso Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1994 Page 3 6. Report on Planning Items Previously Forwarded to City Council. Staff reported that the PUD reviewed in March by the Planning Commission was approved. 7. Discussion of Development In and Near Owasso. Staff noted several subdivision applications. 8. Adjournment - Charles Willey moved, Dewey Brown seconded, to adjourn the meeting. A vote on the motion was recorded as follows: Charles Willey - Yes Dewey Brown - Yes Ray Haynes - Yes Gary Wells - Yes Pat Imbriano - Yes The motion carried 5 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Chairperson Secretary Date MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR KOURTIS OFFICE CENTER DATE: May 2, 1994 BACKGROUND Kourtis Office Center, a proposed office /commercial center housing 3 usable areas within one principal structure, would be located on Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Elm Creek Commercial Corner. A location map as well as a plat map of Elm Creek Commercial Corner is attached for your information and review. The Owasso Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the site plan for Kourtis Office Center at their April 27th meeting. No comments from utility representatives were received regarding the proposal. The site plan does adhere to Owasso Zoning Code requirements for setbacks, parking, etc. It should be noted that this area is zoned CG (Commercial General), suitable for both commercial and office uses. At this time, two tenants have been identified. Pete Kourtis Homes and Delta Software plan to locate their facilities at this location. The applicant should note that a separate building permit would be needed for any signage being proposed for the development. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of the proposed site plan. ATTACHMENTS /ENCLOSURES 1. Location Map. 2. Elm Creek Commercial Corner Plat. 3. Site Plan Information. SUBJECT SITE ELM CREEK COMMERCIAL CORNER CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department OZ -94 -02 Staff Report Timothy D. Rooney - City Planner BACKGROUND APPLICANT AND STATUS OF APPLICANT: Elaine Parmley, applicant/agent for Robert Young, owner. REQUESTED ACTION AND PURPOSE: A request for the rezoning of property from RS -3 (Residential Single - Family High Density) to CG (Commercial General) in order to allow for the development of mini - storage units. LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject site is generally located on the southeast corner of S. Main Street and Fourth Avenue, further described as Lots 3 and 4, Block 33, Owasso Original Town Addition. The subject property contains .67 acres more or less. EXISTING LAND USE: Subject property is developed with an abandoned residential structure. SURROUNDING LAND USE: The subject site is bordered on the north by Fourth Avenue, while further north lies single- family dwellings. The subject property is bordered on the east by a single - family residence as well. Both properties to the north and east are zoned RS -3. The subject property is bordered to the south by undeveloped property zoned RS -3. South Main St. borders the subject tract to the west, while further west lies undeveloped land zoned IL )Light Industrial). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject area as being appropriate for Residential Uses. However, it is important to note that the Comprehensive Plan may be out dated when applied to this area. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The Zoning Code for the City of Owasso, Chapter 15 "Amendments ", Chapter 6 "Commercial District Provisions" SITE INFORMATION: Both sewer and water are available to the subject site. Portions of this property lie within the flood plain thus requiring some fill work on the lot before any redevelopment. Other than the fill work, no unusual development hardships are anticipated. Staff Report OZ -94 -02 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS The zoning request for CG (Commercial General) to allow for mini - storage units on the subject property is an interesting one; one which is likely to evoke much emotion from abutting and surrounding property owners. This portion of Owasso, more particularly South Main Street, has seen many changes in the last two decades. Primarily one of the older residential neighborhoods in Owasso, a spur of industrial type uses has developed to the west and south which have made this area a focal point for the Owasso Economic Development Authority's efforts in establishing a bonafide industrial park. Within the last ten years, numerous city facilities such as the sewer treatment plant, new maintenance garage, recycle center, RV convenience station, and dog pound have all located in this southern portion of town. In addition to city facilities, the Max Buchanan Company also located their operations in this industrial area in 1993 with another possible major employer locating in this area in 1994 (See OZ- 9403). The opening of South Main to the Max Buchanan building several months ago, and its eventual continuation as S. Fifth Avenue to the Service Road, has and will continue to open up this area for industrial development. The intersection of Main Street and E. 76th Street North will also see improvements this summer, improvements which will include designated turning lanes and new signalization, which is also likely to increase non - residential traffic on South Main. It is easy to see that this area has strong economic development potential, primarily industrial in nature. Its availability to water and sewer, as well as other utilities makes the area marketable. Current improvements to traffic flow in this area, as well as the future improvements previously mentioned, also assist in that arena. However, what is not easy to see or determine is where one draws the line between residential and industrial or commercial development. When one visits this neighborhood (more specifically homes on the north side of Fourth Avenue and homes that would abut the subject site which front on Birch), one gets a strong sense of neighborhood pride. Typically, neighbors in small, established residential areas like this one are comprised of homeowners who grew up together, inherited or purchased the home from a family member, and take great pride in raising their families in the same neighborhood, if not the same home, in which they were raised. These homes also provide an affordable housing alternative that is not typically found in Owasso. As Owasso continues to grow, affordable housing alternatives are shrinking. This portion of Owasso, with the exception of some recently constructed homes, predominately contains small cottage -type homes. Homes of this size, quite frankly, are not being built anymore. Staff Report OZ -94 -02 Page 3 of 3 The following are a list of questions /concerns that I feel are important when one reviews this rezoning request: * What types of impacts (positive or negative) would a rezoning of this property from RS -3 to CG have on surrounding residents and /or economic developments in this area? * Should industrial /commercial development in this area begin to "spill- over" within this block at this time? * Should industrial /commercial development be allowed to grow northward into an existing neighborhood or should it remain south of this area? While I do not feel these are all the questions which need to be addressed, I do feel these are probably the most important ones. I think what makes this rezoning more difficult than others that have occurred near this area is the fact that this property has been used as for residential purposes. Previous rezonings and /or development have occurred on undeveloped, unused property, thus making a decision easier to obtain. I do feel that influx of industrial or commercial uses in this area will continue to present themselves, and it may even be possible that the block in which this property is located could become an area for industrial /commercial uses in the future. However, I feel that at this time it is important to preserve the current residential zoning of this property in order to protect the existing residential uses adjacent to the tract on the north, east, and south. Again, this recommendation to deny the applicant's requested CG zoning should not necessarily be viewed by the neighborhood as a permanent stop to the encroachment of industry in this area. This is a rapidly developing industrial area, one which is likely to expand to the north. However, I feel the industrial growth should work northward on the west side of South Main before "jumping" Main Street to the east side. In other words, it should not start on a tract of land that is abutted on three sides by single - family residential zoning. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission deny the rezoning of the subject property from RS -3 to CG. ATTACHEMENTS 1. Location map. 2. Letter sent to surrounding property owners. SUBJECT SITE OZ-9402 City of Owasso 207 SOUTH CEDAR (918) 272 -2251 P.O. BOX 180 FAX. (918) 272 -4999 OWASSO, OKLAHOMA Li 74055 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER OZ -9402 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Owasso Planning Commission in the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma at 7:00 PM on the 10th day of May, 1994. At that time and place, the Owasso Planning Commission will consider a request from Elaine Parmley, applicant for Robert Young, owner; for a proposed change of the zoning classification from an RS -3 (Residential Single Family Density) to CG (Commercial General) District, which would allow for Commercial General Land Uses. The subject property is described as follows: Lots 3 and 4, Block 33, Owasso Original Town Addition, said tract containing .67 acres, more or less. As an abutting or nearby property owner, you are being notified so that you may be able to express your views or concerns regarding this request. If you are unable to attend this meeting, please forward any comments you may have in writing to the Owasso Planning Department, 207 S. Cedar Street. These comments will be presented to the Planning Commission members at the scheduled public hearing by Planning Staff. Information and maps showing the property location may be inspected in the office of the City Planner, 207 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma, 74055 or by calling 272 -2251. This is your only personal notification of this request. Dated at Owasso, Oklahoma, this 20th day of April, 1994. Sincerely, Timothy D. R ney City Planner CITY OF OWASSO Planning Department OZ -94 -03 Staff Report Timothy D. Rooney - City Planner BACKGROUND APPLICANT AND STATUS OF APPLICANT: City of Owasso, agent for Star Community Mental Health Center, Inc., owner. REQUESTED ACTION AND PURPOSE: A request for the rezoning of property from AG (Agriculture General District) and RM -1 (Residential Multi - Family Low Density District) to IL (Industrial Light District) to allow for the development of additional manufacturing. LOCATION AND SIZE: The property is generally located within the NE/4 of Section 31, T21N, R14E of the I.B.M. The complete legal description of the property is attached for your information and review. The property is more specifically defined as being immediately south of the Cedarcrest Apartments Iocated at 401 S. Cedar. The entire subject property contains approximately 16.56 acres, more or less. EXISTING LAND USE: Subject property is undeveloped. SURROUNDING LAND USE: Property immediately north of the subject property is zoned RM -1 and contains Cedarcrest Apartments, while abutting the subject property on the south contains undeveloped land zoned AG (Agriculture). Property to the east of the subject site is zoned IL (Industrial Light) and contains the properties and businesses that abut the west service road of Highway 169. Property to the west of the subject property is zoned IL also and contains the Max Buchanan operations, while further west are the city's Public Works garages, recycle center, animal control, and sewage treatment facility. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being appropriate for Residential Uses. However, it is important to note that the Comprehensive Plan may be outdated in this area. (See OZ- 94 -04) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The Zoning Code for the City of Owasso, Chapter 15 "Amendments ", and Chapter 7 "Industrial District Provisions." SITE INFORMATION: The subject property lies in an area that is known to become wet and marshy following heavy rains and flooding of the Bird Creek. Fill dirt is likely to be necessary in this area prior to any development which would occur. Staff Report OZ -94 -03 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS The proposed rezoning, if approved, would create an additional 16.56 acre area of undeveloped property for industrial development purposes. Currently, the Owasso Economic Development Authority is working with a possible manufacturer which could locate on this site. The subject site, while being bordered on the north by Residential Multi- Family and on the south by Agriculture zoning, is bordered on two sides by Industrial Light zoning. This abutting zoning also contains actual uses and is not undeveloped. This portion of Owasso has been expanding with industrial /manufacturing uses, most recently with the addition of the Max Buchanan facility in 1993. The recently completed portion of South Main Street, through the city facilities and looping back to the Max Buchanan facility, has also made the immediate area - more specifically the subject property - much more attractive for industrial development. The eventual completion of Fifth Avenue to the service road will provide more convenient access to Highway 169 and hopefully eliminate industrial traffic on Cedar. Cedar, in the future, will become a "dead - end" street serving local traffic only. As stated in the previous zoning case, the expansion of a zoning of this intensity should be of a logical planned pattern, rather than "spot zoning" to be surrounded by a largely different zoning classification. This site is abutted on two sides by industrial zoning and development and a rezoning of this property to the same classification is logical. In fact, without a rezoning, one is likely to never see the subject property develop further in any manner. The Owasso Zoning Code requires a 75 foot buffer from abutting residential districts and staff feels this buffer can be utilized in a manner which would prevent an adverse impact on the nearby apartments. If approved ,creative landscaping in the buffer area is likely to be a requirement of city staff at site plan review stages as there are numerous of trees located on the north end of the subject property today. RECOMMENDATION Staff feels the rezoning of the subject property is a logical expansion of area industrial zoning and development and recommends approval of the rezoning request from RM -1 and AG to IL. Staff Report OZ -94 -03 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map. 2. Letter sent to surrounding property owners containing the legal description of the subject property. SUBJECT SITE OZ-9403 City of Owasso 207 SOUTH CEDAR (918) 272 -2251 P.O. BOX 180 FAX. (918) 272 4999 OWASSO, OKLAHOMA 74055 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER OZ -9403 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Owasso Planning Commission in the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma at 7:00 PM on the 10th day of May, 1994. At that time and place, the Owasso Planning Commission will consider a request from Steve Compton, agent for the Owasso Economic Development Authority, City of Owasso, owner; for a proposed change of the zoning classification from RM -1 (Residential Multi Family Low Density) and AG (Agriculture) to IL (Light Industrial) District, which would allow for Manufacturing Land Uses. The subject property is described as follows: A tract of land that is 552 feet in width and 1307 feet in length lying in the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE/4) of Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 14 East, East of the Indian Base and Meridian, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, being more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 31, T-21-N, R-14-E, thence Westerly along the north line of said Section 31 for a distance of 1321.19 feet to the Northeast Corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31; thence Southerly along the east line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31 for a distance of 1045 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South along the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 31 for a distance of 1307 feet to a point; thence easterly and parallel to the north line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31 for a distance of 552 feet to a point; thence Northerly and parallel to the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31 for a distance of 1307 feet to a point; thence Westerly for a distance of 552 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 16.56 acre more or less Owasso, Oklahoma, County of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma. The general location of the property is directly south of Cedar Crest Apartments. As an abutting or nearby property owner, you are being notified so that you may be able to express your views or concerns regarding this request. If you are unable to attend this meeting, please forward any comments you may have in writing to the Owasso Planning Department, 207 S. Cedar Street. These comments will be presented to the Planning Commission members at the scheduled public hearing by Planning Staff. Information and maps showing the property location may be inspected in the office of the City Planner, 207 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma, 74055 or by calling 272 - 2251. This is your only personal notification of this request. Dated at Owasso, Oklahoma, this 20th day of April, 1994. Sincerely, Timothy D. Rooney City Planner MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: May 4, 1994 BACKGROUND The City of Owasso has received a request to review a preliminary plat for Bailey Ranch Estates (Phase I). Bailey Ranch Estates is a planned unit development located 1/4 mile north of E. 96th Street North, east of Garnett Road. Phase I of this development reflects that it would consist of 118 lots on 40.64 acres of property. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the preliminary plat at their April 27, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the applicants were supplied with a list of staff corrections to the plat. In addition to staff comments, the utility companies also had several requests for easements at different locations throughout the plat. A list combining staff and utility companies' corrections is attached for your review. The construction plans are still in their review process and should not be looked on as lacking any significant information at this time as this is a preliminary plat. A memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician, is attached for your information and review. The plat itself reflects two of three entrances we will see off of N. Garnett Road. Each entrance will utilize an acceleration /deceleration lane as recommended within the PUD. Also, the applicant utilizes limits of no access within the subdivision, thus eliminating significant amounts of curb cuts along the major through street (E. 100th Street North). In fact, the applicant met several times with city staff to ensure that their application would contain as much as possible the first time the Planning Commission reviewed it. The Bailey Ranch Estates plat is certainly one of the most complete, as far as information is concerned, as I have reviewed while in preliminary stages. As stated previously, the Bailey Ranch Estates development is a planned unit development, thus certain conditions exist that are not always applicable to other residential subdivisions. Those conditions, part of the applicants development text, are to be included and listed separately within the covenants of the addition. The covenants submitted by the applicants, while not displaying those conditions separately, did contain most of those conditions throughout them. The applicant has been instructed to add those conditions, separately, to the covenants. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending Planning Commission approval of the preliminary plat for Bailey Ranch Estates ATTACHMENTS 1. TAC recommendations from the April 27, 1.994 meeting. 2. Memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician. 3. Conditions of the Bailey Ranch Estates PUD. ENCLOSURES 1. Preliminary plat for Bailey Ranch Estates. 5. Covenants for Bailey Ranch Estates. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY D. ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: April 28, 1994 The following corrections /comments were made regarding the final plat review of Bailey Ranch Estates at the April 27, 1994 TAC meeting: PLAT Add a 10 foot U/E to the North boundary of Lot 5, Block 2. Add either a 17.5 foot U/E or an additional 11 foot WE by separate instrument along the north perimeter of the subdivision. Add either a 17.5 foot U/E or two 11 foot U/E's be separate instrument along the north boundary of Lot 1, Block 3. Add an 11 foot U/E along the north boundary of Lot 4, Block 6. Add two 5 foot U /E's on the shared property lines of the following lots: Lots 15 & 16, Block 6 Lots 6 & 7, Block 7 Lots 8 & 9, Block 5 Lots 21 & 22, Block 5 Lots 2 & 3, Block 6 Lots 12 & 13, Block 4 Lots 1 & 2, Block 2 Lots 33 & 34, Block 6 Lots 3 & 4, Block 3 Lots 1 & 2, Block 4 Lots 12 & 13, Block 4 Lots 8 & 9, Block 6 Lots 3 & 4, Block I Lots 15 & 16, Block 7 Add one 5 foot U/E on the following lots: North boundary of Lot 14, Block 6 North boundary of Lot 9, Block 7 North boundary of Lot 1, Block 2 West of 114th E. Avenue - 10 foot U /E. Include the PUD case number on the plat. Any additional subdivisions within Section 17 should be shown on the location map. Add addresses to the final plat submittal (Not necessary for preliminary plat). DEED OF DEDICATION Revise legal description. 1236.71 does not match dimension on plat. Reserve areas are mentioned but not shown on the plat. PUD conditions were not included within the covenants. As a condition of the PUD, they are to be filed with the covenants. Add PSO's statement regarding overhead utility lines along the south boundary of the subdivision as well as along Garnett Road. Add "communication" to paragraph B of covenants regarding utilities. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER FROM: ROHN MUNN PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: REVIEW PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED, NOTTINGHAM ESTATES, CENTRAL PARK, AND BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: May 3, 1994 The review process for the above mentioned projects is in its final stages. None of the above projects are anticipated to contain any significant changes, therefore the platting process should continue at this time. The Planning Commission and applicant should note, however, that their individual items will not be placed on the City Council agenda for final plat approval until the Public Works department issues a final set of "Plans for Construction." It is anticipated that this approval can be obtained by mid -May - thus allowing these items to be placed on the Council agenda. Bailey Ranch Estates construction plans, a preliminary plat application, have been reviewed and several changes were directed to be made. The Bailey Ranch Estates applicants had numerous meetings with city staff prior to their preliminary plat application submittals, thus eliminating any significant changes even at the preliminary stage. Mr. Rooney will have a copy of all construction plans at the Planning Commission meeting for your review. If you have any questions before Tuesday, please don't hesitate to contact me at 272 -4959. CONDITIONS OF BAILEY RANCH ESTATES PUD (1) That the applicant's Development Text and Conceptual Development Plan be considered to be the Outline Development Plan as required by the PUD Chapter of the Owasso Zoning Code. (2) That unless specifically set out in the standards and conditions of this PUD, single - family detached lots shall meet all the necessary requirements of a typical RS -2 district. (3) That a subdivision plat be approved by the Owasso City Council and filed with the County Clerk's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said covenants shall incorporate all PUD standards and conditions of approval and make the City of Owasso beneficiary. (4) All conditions imposed by the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee for subdivision plat approval be met as conditions of the PUD. (5) A detailed drainage report be submitted by the applicant. (6) That within the PUD, the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed 436 units. (7) Sidewalks be provided in all areas of the PUD. (8) That the minimum side yard of any corner lot be 25 feet. (9) That the minimum rear yard setback of any lot within the addition be 20% of the lot depth providing it is not less than 25 feet. (10) A rear building line of 50 feet be provided along the east and north perimeter, larger lots. (11) That all landscaping plans for the entrances shall be reviewed and approved by the Owasso Planning Commission and installed prior to the occupancy of any buildings. (12) The larger lot sizes designated along the north and east boundaries of the PUD shall not be altered to a smaller lot size. (13) All water lines installed within the PUD boundary shall meet the City of Owasso's standards. Water pressure shall also meet the City of Owasso's standards. TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT - DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED DATE: May 4, 1994 BACKGROUND The City of Owasso received a request for the review of a preliminary plat for Double Oaks Extended in late March 1994. The preliminary plat for Double Oaks Extended was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their April 12, 1994 meeting and unanimously approved. Double Oaks Extended will contain 95 single - family residential lots on approximately 29.23 acres, more or less. Double Oaks Extended is located directly north of Double Oaks Estates, east and south of Double Oaks II and west of Double Oaks III. The existing zoning of this area is RS -3 (Residential Single Family High Density). The final plat for Double Oaks Extended was reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee at their April 27, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the plat was reviewed by the area utility representatives with several easements being requested to be added to the plat. In addition to the utility companies, staff also provided the applicant with a list of corrections to be made to the plat. This list of all corrections is attached for your review. All items requested by the utility companies, as well as city staff, have been included on the plat enclosed within your packets. The construction plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and its Engineering Division with several corrections being requested. All major changes have been made and any remaining changes are viewed as minor and should not prevent action on this final plat. The Planning Commission and the applicant should note that no action will be taken on this plat by the City Council until a final set of construction plans exists. A memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician, regarding the construction plans is attached for your review. Two things should be pointed out when reviewing this plat. Upon the completion of the platting of this property, almost all of Section 29 will be completed. In addition, this is the first final plat we are processing which contains the addresses on the plat. As stated to you earlier in the year, final plats will now contain addresses when recorded. The other two plats to be reviewed this evening also contain addresses. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Double Oaks Extended. ATTACHMENTS 1. TAC requirements from April 27, 1994 meeting. 2. Memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician. ENCLOSURE 1. Final plat for Double Oaks Extended. 2. Covenants for Double Oaks Extended. MEMORANDUM TO: TIIE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER FROM: ROHN MUNN PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: REVIEW PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED, NOTTINGHAM ESTATES, CENTRAL PARK, AND BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: May 3, 1994 The review process for the above mentioned projects is in its final stages. None of the above projects are anticipated to contain any significant changes, therefore the platting process should continue at this time. The Planning Commission and applicant should note, however, that their individual items will not be placed on the City Council agenda for final plat approval until the Public Works department issues a final set of "Plans for Construction." It is anticipated that this approval can be obtained by mid -May - thus allowing these items to be placed on the Council agenda. Bailey Ranch Estates construction plans, a preliminary plat application, have been reviewed and several changes were directed to be made. The Bailey Ranch Estates applicants had numerous meetings with city staff prior to their preliminary plat application submittals, thus eliminating any significant changes even at the preliminary stage. Mr. Rooney will have a copy of all construction plans at the Planning Commission meeting for your review. If you have any questions before Tuesday, please don't hesitate to contact me at 272 -4959. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY D. ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED DATE: April 28, 1994 The following corrections /comments were made regarding the final plat review of Double Oaks Extended at the April 27, 1994 TAC meeting: PLAT Remove WE shown on the East boundary of Lot 13, Block 3. Add the proper dimension (10 feet) to the U/E on Lot 14, Block 3. Add two 5 foot U /E's on the shared property lines of the following lots: Lots 5 & 6, Block 1 Lots 9 & 10, Block 1 Lots 13 & 14, Block 1 Lots 11 & 12, Block 3 Lots 8 & 9, Block 3 Change the 15 foot D/E on the West boundary of Lot 8, Block 3 to a U /E. Add a 10 foot U/E to the East boundary of Lot 7, Block 3. Provide bearings or distances around the perimeter. Dimension all street widths. Lot 18, Block 1 - easements are shown on the construction plans for this lot and not shown on the plat. Cul -de -sac radius should be 50 feet ... not 52 feet. Dimensions on the S/E cul -de -sac need to be provided. Add addresses to the final plat. DEED OF DEDICATION 29.23 acres included in the legal description does not match the total shown on the plat. Please verify. All subdivisions in Section 29 need to be shown on the location map. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT - CENTRAL PARK (PHASE 1) DATE: May 2, 1994 BACKGROUND The City of Owasso received a request to review the preliminary plat for Central Park Addition in mid -January of 1994. Due to a subsequent rezoning application, the preliminary plat for the subject property was not acted on by the Planning Commission until March of 1994. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat at their March 14th meeting. The first phase of Central Park contains 44 residential lots on a 44 acre site and is located west of 129th E. Avenue, north of E. 86th Street North and consists of one entry from 129th E. Avenue. An additional entry from 129th E. Avenue is anticipated with future platting of the remaining property. Central Park is zoned for RS -3 development as a result of the Planned Unit Development abandonment in February. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the final plat at their March 30, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the applicant was provided a list of all staff comments regarding the plat. In addition to staff comments, several utility representatives also provided some additional easement requests. A copy of those corrections are attached for your review. All requested corrections, staff's and utility representatives', are included within the enclosed plat and covenants. This plat was held from the April Planning Commission agenda due to significant corrections that were required by the Public Works and Engineering departments regarding the Construction Plans and agenda deadlines. Please note that with the exception of a few minor remaining corrections, all of the significant changes that were required by Public Works and Engineering have been addressed at this time. The Planning Commission and the applicant should note that the plat and construction plans will not be forwarded to City Council for action until there is a finalized set of constriction plans. A memo from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician, is attached for your information and review. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the final plat for Central Park (Phase I). ATTACHMENTS List of corrections from March 30, 1994 TAC meeting. Memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician. ENCLOSURE 1. Final plat for Central Park Addition. 2. Covenants for Central Park Addition. Final Plat - Central Park Addition Plat 1) Need book and page of all easements by separate instruments shown of final plat. 2) Add sheet 1 of 2 to bottom right corner. 3) Delta angles of all curves must be shown on plat. 4) Distance along 129th does not match "deed of dedication ". 5) Change bearing direction on SE dead end street to reflect 1) covenants. 6) Direction of bearing along north line can not be SW, it is either NE or SE. 7) Offsite sanitary sewer needs to be in a 10' easement on both sides. Sheet 2 of 2 (Deed of Dedication) 1) Legal description does not match plat. 2) The "Park Area" is not shown on this plat but is stated. 3) The "Reserve Areas" are stated but not shown on this plat. 4) Need tree statement with penalty. 5) Need fence statement for all DE's shown on this plat. 6) Show sheet 2 of 2 at bottom right corner. Sheet 1 of 9 (construction plans) 1) Cover sheet needs to reflect approved FINAL plat, in regards to 1) all easements shown. Sheet 2 of 9 1) The 1st inlet up stream shall be located in such a way that water does not travel more than 600 feet, revise plans. 2) Onsite detention is required and not shown. 3) Shorten island in east cul -de -sac. 4) Remove island in N/W cul -de -sac. Sheet 3 of 9 1) Show fill and add statement for fill. 2) Does JB Al tie to 15" entrance culvert? If so, where are the details. Flowline of JB is lower than 15" culvert. Where is water going? 3) Station 398 +46.17 indicates centerline of roadway is below R/W. Where is the water going? 4) The pipe at the entrance way does not have any Q's shown on profiles or stated in summary table. Why? Also state type of proposed pipe for entry way. 5) End curb /gutter section at r/w line 129th. Revise entrance culvert profile to reflect this. Sheet 4 of 9 1) Show all blow off's to be hydrant assembly type. 2) Move service taps to the north and south respectively. 3) Alternate for S/E cul -de -sac is to add main. Sheet 5 of 9 1) Water line pipe shall be either 6" DR 19 C900 OR 8" DR 18 C900. Is water pressure sufficient to use DR18 instead of DR14? 2) Add stations for all sleaves (the ends) shown on profiles. Sheet 6/7 of 9 1) Holding off any comment because of needing additional information on the impact of this subdivision and others to our system. Sheet 8 of 9 1) Place #4 deformed rebars spaced 36" c/c in gutter pan area for tying to pavement at a later date. 2) All deformed rebars will not be any larger than a #4, revise details. 3) Need soils report to determine pavement, and subgrade thickness. Sheet 9 of 9 1) Add concrete ring to manhole detail. 2) Add dimensions and statement to F.H. base (see Mr. Kane for information). 3) Add blow -off hydrant assembly detail (see Mr. Kane for details). MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER FROM: ROHN MUNN PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: REVIEW PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED, NOTTINGHAM ESTATES, CENTRAL PARK, AND BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: May 3, 1994 The review process for the above mentioned projects is in its final stages. None of the above projects are anticipated to contain any significant changes, therefore the platting process should continue at this time. The Planning Commission and applicant should note, however, that their individual items will not be placed on the City Council agenda for final plat approval until the Public Works department issues a final set of "Plans for Construction." It is anticipated that this approval can be obtained by mid -May - thus allowing these items to be placed on the Council agenda. Bailey Ranch Estates construction plans, a preliminary plat application, have been reviewed and several changes were directed to be made. The Bailey Ranch Estates applicants had numerous meetings with city staff prior to their preliminary plat application submittals, thus eliminating any significant changes even at the preliminary stage. Mr. Rooney will have a copy of all construction plans at the Planning Commission meeting for your review. If you have any questions before Tuesday, please don't hesitate to contact me at 272 -4959. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT - NOTTINGHAM ESTATES DATE: May 3, 1994 BACKGROUND The City of Owasso received a request to review the preliminary plat for Nottingham Estates in mid - February of 1994. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 14, 1994 and was unanimously approved. Nottingham Estates is located east of Windsor Lake II Addition and south of Pleasant View Estates addition which is located in the county. Access to the Nottingham Estates Addition would currently be through the Pleasant View Estates Addition only, while future access would occur through platting of abutting property on the west and east. The first phase of Nottingham Estates contains 46 residential lots on 26.49 acres and is zoned RS -2 (Residential Single - Family Medium Density). The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the final plat at their March 30, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the applicant was provided a list of all staff comments regarding the plat. In addition to staff comments, several utility representatives also provided some additional easement requests. A copy of those corrections are attached for your review. All requested corrections, staff's and utility representatives', are included within the enclosed plat and covenants. This plat was not permitted to be reviewed by the Planning Commission in April due to significant changes /corrections required by the Public Works Engineering Division regarding the Construction Plans and agenda deadlines. All significant changes that were required by the Engineering Division have been addressed at this time, although a few minor changes may still be needed. The Planning Commission and applicant should note that the plat and construction plans will not be forwarded to City Council for action until there is a finalized set of construction plans. A memo from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician, is attached for your information and review. As you may recall when the preliminary plat was reviewed in March, a concern from property owners in the Pleasant View Addition was aired regarding construction traffic through that addition. Property owners were concerned that heavy construction equipment would damage the residential streets and also present a hazard to children within their addition. Through a series of meetings between the applicant, County Commissioner Lewis Harris, and City Manager Rodney Ray, a working agreement has been developed. While not yet implemented, the applicant has indicated he will erect a sign at the entrance of the Pleasant View Addition and will construct a construction entrance further to the east on 96th Street and instruct his personnel to use it. An additional sign will also be located at that entrance. Also of concern when the preliminary plat was reviewed was the sanitary sewer, and how this addition would be serviced. The applicant has purchased an easement which allows this addition to be tied to the Brentwood Estates Addition on 86th Street. The Brentwood Estates sanitary sewer was designed to handle a large drainage basin in Section 21. Nottingham Estates falls within that drainage basin. A copy of the memo from the preliminary plat review is attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the final plat of Nottingham Estates. ATTACHMENTS 1. List of corrections from March 30, 1994 TAC meeting. 2. Memorandum from Rohn Munn, Engineering Technician. 3. Staff memo for Nottingham Estates preliminary plat review. ENCLOSURE 1. Final plat for Nottingham Estates Addition. 2. Covenants for Central Park Addition. ITEM NO. 6 Final Plat - Nottingham Estates Sheet 1 of 2 (plat) 1) Show Barrington Point on location map. 2) Legal is wrong; it should read SE /4 of the NW /4. 3) Description of P.O.B. is wrong (Should be SE /4 NW /4). 4) Erase extension of the 17.5' easement line past the 25' BL /UE on Lot 1, Block 1. 5) At the last TAC meeting, a 5' U/E was requested on both sides by PSO for the west lot line of Lot 5, Block 3. Has this changed? 6) Clean up easement lines in lots 1, 6, 8 of Block 1. 7) Should we move the proposed 5' D/E to the inside of the 5' U/E so that homeowners will not build fence over easement area. If this area is for underground storm and no above ground water channel, change D /E. 8) Common lot lines for lots 8/9 & 11/12 of Block 2 should be changed in order to provide a more uniform flow of lot lines (see sketch). 9) Show delta angles for all curves. Sheet 2 of 2 (deed of dedication) 1) Add sheet 2 of 2 to the bottom right hand corner. 2) Need legal description. 3) In "Homeowners Association" change WINDSOR LAKE to match this plat name. 4) Change 3rd paragraph under #5 to match plat name. 5) Revise #6 to reflect approval of plans of paragraph three (3). 6) Add statement of fences installed in D.E.'s. 7) #13 does not apply to this subdivision. 8) Add tree statement in easement ways. 9) Take month stated out of development statement (1st paragraph after #26). 10) Charles Helscel is mentioned as the developer on the plat. Yet, "Tyann Development" is stated within the covenants with statement in notary acknowledging Mr. Helscel as president. Consistency needs to be provided Sheet 1 of 10 (construction plans) 1) Cover sheet needs to reflect the final plat approved. 2) POB is wrong. Sheet 2 of 10 1) Need soils report to determine proper pavement design and subgrade preparation. 2) Typical pavement section is too small, enlarge. Sheet 3 of 10 1) Storm sewer structure summary table not complete. 2) Need to visit with engineer on drainage map. 3) Not enough street inlets to intercept water. 4) Need either storm sewer system at the north property line or provide drainage channel or diversion. How is water from the north entering the subdivision intercepted? 5) Tie inlet D -3 to existing structure in WL II, or provide another alternative. Sheet 4 of 10 1) Extend profile from existing structure in WL II down to inlet D -3. 2) Show bench marks. 3) Show how you plan on tying to existing pavement to the north. Extend profile at least 200'. 4) Show fill at end of E. 135th. 5) All outlet structures shall be concrete and details provided. 6) All tops (48" Line D). 7) Where will water elevation be in park Area at each outlet structure? Will there be back flows into the storm system? Sheet 7 of 10 (This should be the next sheet) 1) This sheet should be in front of the paving /drainage profiles (suggestion only). 2) Show proposed contours as a solid, heavy line. 3) How are you going to keep the dam from seeping? No specification of soil types, no notes. Provide data on plans. 4) Provide plans, details, and notes on how the pond is to be filled. Compaction tests will be required all along the area where there is planned a street. 5) Grading plan does not reflect arrows shown on Sheet 3 at E. 92nd Street North. 6) Type of material for berm should be stated. State flowline of outlet structure (berm /dam). 7) Will top of berm /dam handle vehicular traffic? 8) Change bed of screenings to Class "A" clean rock (11/2" to 211). Apparently this structure is to be laid in the existing creek flowline, screening will not stay dry. 9) Show dimensions as stated on sheet 7 (thickness of bottom, NIS toe widths Of outfall structure). 10) Does park area need trickle channel? 11) Show bench marks. Sheet 5 of 10 1) Show dimensions of water lines to property lines. 2) Waterline that is proposed to tie to WL II is not a 12 ", it is an 8 ". 3) Show bench marks. 4) Provide future line to the north with size and tie to existing line in Pleasant View. 5) Change the two 45 degree bends to one 90 degree bend. 6) Show all G.V.'s at intersections closer together. 7) A 8x8x8x6 cross is cheaper than an 8x8 cross with 8x6 reducer, change. 8) Use blow off hydrant assemblies instead of blind flanges.\ 9) Use blow off hydrants in cul -de -sacs. 10) Provide 8" water line along the south side of E. 91st Street North. 11) Move F.H.'s so that they will line up with property lines. 12) Change west NIS line to 8 ". 13) Reroute line another way then through lots 3/4, block 1. 14) Make sure all lots are served. 15) Extend water in cul -de -sac to serve lots 15, block 2 & lot 2, block 2. Sheet 6 of 10 1) If you would straighten up the back lot lines of lots 13/14 and 7/6 of block 2, you then can eliminate manholes D2 and E2; E4 could change to lamphole. Revise lot lines 9/8 and 11/12 of block 2. 2) Might move Line A to the front along N. 135th because W.L II's lots that adjoin have their own lines. 3) Show bench marks. 4) Need to see an overall conceptional plan to really access the needs for sanitary sewers properly. 5) Need to show all street crossings as being sleeved, along with all conflicts or crossings of other utilities on plan and profile sheets. 6) Review standard practices for end runs of sanitary sewer lines to be 6 ". Sheet 8 of 10 1) Why DR14 and not DR18 (water)? 2) Where is the sanitary sewer going? If offsite, where? 3) Grade is too steep between Al and Cl, revise. 4) Use C900 from A2 to A3 because of dam. 5) Revise all profiles that are affected by plan revisions. 6) Line C (water) needs to flow a little smoother than profile indicates. 7) Fill areas must be inplace prior to any construction and stated so on all appropriate sheets. Sheet 9 of 10 1) Delete key way detail(s). 2) Add #4 deformed rebars to gutter pan area for future ties to pavement. 3) Show J.B. detail as poured inplace and add detail for precast. 4) Need to see soils report to verify pavement, subgrade design. 5) If trickle channel is used, provide detail. 6) Change inlet detail to reflect bedding material to be placed above top of pipe. Do it like you have done other plans. Sheet 10 of 10 1) Add ring to "PRE-CAST MH ". 2) add another dimension to FH detail. See others you have done. 3) Add "optional" to TYPICAL BLOW OFF VALVE and add detail for blow off hydrants assembly. See other plans you have done. Stormwater Detention Report 1) What is the soils characteristics of A and B? Please state so in report. 2) On sheet 9 of 10, existing contours are not correct because W.L. II now exists. 3) On sheet 10 of 10, proposed conditions do not reflect park area or dam. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANWING COMMISSION TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER FROM: ROHN MUNN PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: REVIEW PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DOUBLE OAKS EXTENDED, NOTTINGHAM ESTATES, CENTRAL PARK, AND BAILEY RANCH ESTATES DATE: May 3, 1994 The review process for the above mentioned projects is in its final stages. None of the above projects are anticipated to contain any significant changes, therefore the platting process should continue at this time. The Planning Commission and applicant should note, however, that their individual items will not be placed on the City Council agenda for final plat approval until the Public Works department issues a final set of "Plans for Construction." It is anticipated that this approval can be obtained by mid -May - thus allowing these items to be placed on the Council agenda. Bailey Ranch Estates construction plans, a preliminary plat application, have been reviewed and several changes were directed to be made. The Bailey Ranch Estates applicants had numerous meetings with city staff prior to their preliminary plat application submittals, thus eliminating any significant changes even at the preliminary stage. Mr. Rooney will have a copy of all construction plans at the Planning Commission meeting for your review. If you have any questions before Tuesday, please don't hesitate to contact me at 272 -4959. MEMORANDUM TO: THE OWASSO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOTTINGHAM ESTATES DATE: February 28, 1994 BACKGROUND The City of Owasso has received a request for review of a preliminary plat for Nottingham Estates. Nottingham Estates is a proposed 46 lot residential addition located on a 26.49 acre tract. The subject tract is located east of Windsor Lake II Addition, south of the Pleasant View Estates addition which is located in Tulsa County. Current access to the subject property would be via 96th Street North through the Pleasant View Addition, The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the preliminary plat at their February 23, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, the applicant was provided a list of all staff comments regarding the plat and construction plans. In addition to staff comments, several utility representatives also provided easement requests. City staff had two major concerns when reviewing the plat and construction plans. The first concern was to ensure that access was provided to this addition via any future developing property to the west or south (Camden Park II). Without any access being provided from the west or south, this addition would theoretically be a long cul -de -sac. For the safety of any residents that would occupy this addition, staff required an access to the south or west. The second concern regarding the plat centered around how the property would be served with sewer. It would appear at this time that sewer service would need to be provided via a line to the Brentwood Estates lift station, and not through the Windsor Lake II /Barrington Point infrastructure. This concern is unresolved at this time and would need to be finalized prior to any approval of a final plat. A list of staff concerns regarding the plat and construction plans has been attached for your information and review. City staff did receive a letter signed by 16 of the 18 property owners of Pleasant View Estates requesting that the applicant utilize a construction entrance on his own property east of their addition in order to "preserve the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood and most importantly the structural integrity of our streets." Upon further review, staff views this request as a safe guard measure. Because the Pleasant View Addition is not within the city limits and any damage that could result to the additions streets during infrastructure construction (i.e. water, sewer, streets) could be substantial from the types of vehicles utilized, staff would encourage the Planning Commission to attach this recommendation to their approval. A copy of the letter from Pleasant View residents is enclosed for your information and review. The enclosed plat includes all of staff's recommendations as well as all utility representatives. The construction plans, while obviously needing modification, should not prevent the Planning Commission from approving the preliminary plat at this time as all construction plan modifications will need to be met prior to final plat application. A copy of the construction plans are available in my office, and will be available the evening of March 8, 1994 for review. RECOMMENDATION Having had all plat comments addressed by the applicant, staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat of Nottingham Estates with the recommendation that the developer utilize a construction entrance to the subject property by way of property owned by the applicant to the east of Pleasant View Estates. ATTACHMENTS 1. A copy of staff comments regarding Nottingham Estates. 2. Proposed covenants for Nottingham Estates Addition. 3. Letter from Pleasant View Estates lot owners. ENCLOSURE 1. Preliminary plat for Nottingham Estates Addition.