HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024.02.13_Worksession AgendaThis meeting Is a worksession for Council/Trustee discussion only.
There is no opportunity for public comments at worksession.
PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY (OPWA)
OWASSO PUBLIC GOLF AUTHORITY (OPGA)
Council Chambers Old Central Building 109 North Birch, Owasso, OK
Tuesday, February 13, 2024 - 6:00 PM
NOTE: APPROPRIATE ACTION may include, but is not limited to: acknowledging, affirming, amending, approving, authorizing,
awarding, denying, postponing, or fabling.
AGENDA
RECEIVED
1. Call to Order- Vice Mayor /Vice Chair Alvin Fruga FEB 0 9 2024 C�S
2. Roll Call
3. Discussion relating to Community Development Department items City Clerk's Office
Alexo Beemer
A. Request for a final plat for Villas at Stonebridge II, approximately 4.99 acres located at 13116
East 76th Street North
B. Request for a planned unit development (PUD) for 116th Attic Storage, approximately 3.392
acres located 1 1 1 1 1 East 1 16th Street North, as referenced in application OPUD 23 -07
4. Discussion relating to an agreement with Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) for the
management of the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program
Dwayne Henderson
5. Discussion relating to the appointment of a Deputy City Clerk
Juliann M. Stevens
6. Discussion relating to proposed revisions to the City Council Code of Ethics and Conduct Policy
Julie Lombardi
7. Discussion relating to the recognition of HC "Will" Williams, the City of Owasso's first Black City Councilor
and Mayor
Vice Mayor Alvin Frugo
8. Discussion relating to City /Authority Manager items
Warren Lehr
A. Monthly sales tax report and revenue outlook
9. City /Authority Manager report
10. City Councilor/Trustee comments and Inquiries
11. Adjournment
Notice of Public Meeting filed in the office of the City Clerk on Friday, December 8, 2023, and the Agenda
posted at City Hall, 200 South Main Street, at 12:00 pm on Friday, February 9, 2024.
Ju iann M. Stevens, City Clerk
The City of Owasso encourages citizen participation. To request an accommodation due to a disability, contact the City Clerk prior
to the scheduled meeting by phone 916- 376 -1502 or by email to istevens @cifvofowosso.com
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Alexo Beemer, AICP, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Final Plat (Reapproval) - Villas at Stonebridge II
DATE: February 9, 2024
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department received an application for review and approval of a final
plat for Villas at Stonebridge II. The subject property is located at 13116 East 76th Street North, near the
southeast corner of the intersection of North 129th East Avenue and East 76th Street North.
SUBJECT PROPERTY /PROJECT DATA:
Property Size
4.99 acres +/-
Current Zoning
Residential Multi - Family (RM)
Present Use
Vacant
Proposed Use
Townhomes /Multiplexes
Lots /Blocks
1 Lot /1 Block
Land Use Master Plan
Transitional
Within PUD?
Yes; OPUD 22 -02
Within Overlay District?
No
Water Provider
Rogers County Rural Water District # 3
Paybacks (assessed at platting)
Storm Siren Fee ($50.00 per acre)
ANALYSIS:
The property was annexed and zoned Residential Multifamily (RM) under Ordinance 1198 in
October 2022. It was then placed within a Planned Unit Development (OPUD 22 -02) overlay in
December 2022, with Ordinance 1201.
Section 2.4.10 of the Owasso Subdivision Regulations states that failure to record a final plat
within six (6) months of the date of the City Council approval shall void all approvals thereto,
unless a written extension is granted.
The final plat for the subject property was originally approved on March 21, 2023. The
applicant failed to record the approved final plat within six (6) month of approval and
did not seek an extension; because of this, the approval for the final plat has lapsed.
o As such, the applicant is now requesting the final plat to be reconsidered by the
Owasso Planning Commission and Owasso City Council, so they may file the plat of the
subject property with Tulsa County, pending approval.
This is a one (1) lot, one (1) block final plat for a multifamily residential development. Said
development will be comprised of a mixture of six -plex and eight -plex townhomes.
The proposed lot as depicted on the plat meets the bulk and area requirements outlined in
both the Owasso Zoning Code for RM -zoned properties, as well as within the OPUD 22 -02
document.
Final Plat- Villas at Stonebridge II
Page 2
• The property will have one (1) access point off of East 76th Street North, which will be separated
from adjacent driveways an adequate distance in order to meet all applicable separation
requirements found within the Owasso Zoning Code.
• Perimeter and interior utility easements are provided, as required, that will allow utility
companies adequate access to serve the development.
• Right -of -way along East 76th Street North is dedicated by this plat in order to accommodate
future roadway widening.
• There is a large detention easement depicted on the plat, located along the southern
boundary of the property to handle the stormwater generated from the development.
• The City of Owasso will provide police, fire, ambulance, and sanitary sewer services to the
property. Rogers County Rural Water District #3 will provide water services to the property.
• Any development that occurs on the subject property must adhere to all subdivision, zoning,
and engineering requirements as well as any requirements applied to the subject property in
OPUD 22 -02.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE:
Direction
Zoning
Use
Land Use Plan
Jurisdiction
North
Residential Estate (RE)
Residential
Transitional
Tulsa County
South
Residential Estate (RE)
Residential
Residential
Tulsa County
East
Residential Multifamily
Multiplexes
Transitional
City of Owasso
West
Co mercial Shopping
Self- Storage
Commercial
City of Owasso
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Owasso Planning Commission will review this item at their regular meeting on February 12, 2024.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Map
Final Plat - Villas at Stonebridge II
.a Yf •��.. °dlrLL°Z —L 1y `' '�' '•A' { ! I' ffj '� 4�1 s..twir \��',��{','.� °` �I Ili 1•y +''� Y �
-'y�'� a"41 i 1 \ r."�/ �C�' �' /J,� •4 \f' I , '�l i
-liftp P: w- -�(, r •,•�,�'�. 'r' 4' �' 1 s _ .� �' _ ! \ s-
�-'' s�5.�.�IK^lev, ��Y� I� • +�"1 sr:l�$°,
c: � �rtn..` L.! e q " v �,'•" -T % 'a � � :d°� e �' d'�� iae.f�� v � /!/•% n'�`— _''.1,Y ,' /�. r P
( 13J
i.
,'44��, 1 1 I tzY.q• \.� �' i144 �`,� �I I _'4\ R1�` —,3 `x r d <..� I
�rnl� ���� -�'. ' 1� j° Q�1.1_W_ ^sr i+ `j0`,' •1. +` _ _ �F�� -, /a
t�J 1 'd' - 2�1 '� l ' i� J �� E r _ al. 2 �.Y �� v
� ,i �r 4
J II'
II�� i ..
ly
`l., �rtr�_' - _ I I� agyyt il• A
r �� Try�
h
Aerial Map N
°. °' 0. 05 0.11 0.16 °,22, Final Plat- The Villas at Stonebridge II Subject Tract n
Mlles N
VILLAS AT SIUN70,GE II
m 1B. 2023
B�.1.1= 11
FINAL PLAT
of
VILLAS AT STONEBRIDGE II
A 14 E
vaer v rrB xwmaBSr ouwmt pn /q a sEanav \xwm -da¢ (AL
ra=w51O 1�4NIY -LME (YI) XMn4 0.1X4 iWRIF➢1 (Nj FA$} Ci nE MW1 ugIWM
NWM9Cn M1NM 11E OlT T
>BP St M
pA40. 110.54 CWtt. 9B\ft R INfINOYA
:_F�� '. _ i
OPUD No. 22 -02
Zoned RM
R
Fw 7" sb"t MWIN
_
N
LpeaI,- Mao
.pt..F.pbM.,L +Nb+M
� CYt10f� _>n1� - -1 1—
W, v,CaofnYYl muM[6
OWNER
12924 E 75th Inveslmenu. LW
—
y
x..
Narmnm, 0111 . 7M9
Pllms (46S) 33D -1321
f¢¢
all
1 I9 _
I,I
ENGINEER
Iq` ,
iI I I
amt. 1••w
Com mtane CtA EnglncMng. PLLC
P.O. Bo. MOM
Nwmm. WJ ma 73070
I
Phmx M)B3] -B13E
_____--- _____ - wuw wl r.nw 1
a F. N Bmz
E.p. pot.: Jun. ep. 2pM
-------------- _ i_ I VLLAS AT STONE GE I I �.-
I
Ij IN
SURVEYOR
Benchmark Surveving &
41
I iij 4II
�I,.
e_jy_
I�R
i it5
i{r: rw.oa rm o°wr.m,
P.a Bw 107e
@
yIR 1 . Xe1
PM1mc (8107 27a -8001
IB1
C A Na. 3
k�. pale W. Juna ]0. 2024
1 NI 1 pn
; I I I �
urt U
aar- fo¢r,v.m
I i
I 1 1 I ••
I
,,,P.cE
smvvw =am.e 1,m x 1 amt
I aj `'^ II9599 1
•
I:I l�. I.
rt ru nv nwn
wvea xn
sea M�E T -2H(
8& R�' IB6M '+w �
I
mraa 4x � tmt xw rl
1._.V,__
ea�mwcxwnrmaw.[
I
W3ut�rz�aram.�xmrm mzx� t =r.0
I I w
I L - - —
Mr u;
,0..kffif 9tl.t a 11p rt .r M
I r - @ - 1
I(
Muo a tmin m xw¢r o
_
- ------ —_
— env
.m,m=ru uw�1°uo.e �1 is miv
s ane�a•s ��q+
VILLAS AT SIUN70,GE II
m 1B. 2023
B�.1.1= 11
xxaw Au XLx( er TxEa PT®rTs
i rm.K F4 inn axM4.]m xY`"t, KPR w.sa vm =M TA�OF rWw m-in
w wn n N w w.r axrx .r u tir aw N w
xn i I- 1pp v/• xr /. xY /q r.r snunxm" (u) b i..xxe xrxRaw lap w.0
xmP• F.xRn 111) w] N u. Mln e.a xw wxvn paMLL we.aP re w u.s amminr
9uwN Invwr. iJw Gnnlx 5181• al binms, Yp mm pllvMl a.vxw n Mw[
¢vmweYq al w
.1 M avnv al q• XM /. el 5.0 ]], i -31 -N. x -N -E lx.We MpS X M']SYMT
vu w al wb 4 .1 • Mlvw ar ¢ML M{ n • PONr 6 K4ww4 LM¢ q
w x/3 XF/. 4 /. .v /I, . x ¢C15'nY e® e 1 .I. I., a w K
mnn ar .eia wn ri/. xrr /4 xd.: mo1S ¢ Km]1Y xna u. 1.N ix. •r .0 as X
¢/RtLPC2 xnvEFy W N. nmpw pbl Xn 3] a /rinn e/ ¢MCP M1r IC u• S 88nµ N wb
Y/i x4. Xw /1 XY /.; MnK 5 MJS'.]M . 6.]nn CI .t1011 Iwl b w T vmw ar vb VA
ne��rra "eni . /wi ]mxK x "�:ro]m'm u:"POei ff uaxr: rxcwv Pwx..x�aP u m. ..mbP
M 4vpr rW bY4D M w].¢ KsO® WO M K 9xZrM. SKID. 14/rµ. KWiFq ,C�
uo aw.E. pOaY �nM tu]I 4R'I wi nq sm w cv+nn EnnYraavr ] At
u[ smwNr m +w.s a YCrovobM .l n wXm. nw .1.. s Ncuwa bomlNrtx
SEDTDX L FA9L M NN UMM
A PUNIC PofNT-0F -WAT ! U161116 P•�Q33
fl wA1Fli A/]D Yql 4AN2
M Cxgr 6 b1 9WL K Kx9sA[ M AMr P M
MMI M 4T4Nr b MxSXx MtRM p nH[ (]) pp ipb M IXC•4 (b10M n ixb y1'
M bmldr]VO RM4 wM CW r]Nr4 YM NN,Mr 6 M.Z M9MM,w5 aWL
]
W=V—.."T bwl x auu K mRrws lb nm.xr Yarorrn¢ K lR
n5 Mr . w. Pxr rm xnnx b rm4Jnb b arb r.Rrm r4® b
Kn¢aRIK�f M 6 rP4KP xC ,OrR K mr Mr xW xN aWL WK M ]4"" "ur
xWSq wr MM r "xR w"l/x w ra M IOR4JrG 0Arw1ww ry C KCn nrK
�K� c �K M � n w�OrOmrs mwn X:xr Wmr Nsmcr x.] 4a M o.m R ub Mr
.manic M. asrK. x.wMrxa K x44 as
.w�Mn� ��xw�]:: •a:� � �Kwa4pr 4 alir r.PYm rE®R]ro e. M 4R 4
uwoR.m'n M mrK.eMR
.. Wlo]Nxe s.nw# wr a M a rK KsaRxc ror # ww w io..miur K
Wr.P1OYM•a 4OM �M�x C�q (xmMiRx MfWrr rr N
6w. Wrt
IwOb1M bCw GID¢xR b xgr64 -M1 fµ1 41Wxd Ix,l xr W
,E4rR P K MuWwp ulx
wrY MCQ ¢rnpFyQ #WI41.4SWmG ;d m. apr mFM Wr ¢•rFP wr Mx4.f #9wE
P4ID, rR 9R®1e5 b ,Sd; LNl W1¢ # Kill N N14 aM xS rax•ar xt
wIDlnr WR,48 r,Nr#6 #r]REfGMWr m R�mriWM W"i"rK r/YI�i6 9xu K DiPKxK[
UaRPOnx xnr,ZY 48 # Nr CwY.4,va] M K W W l Wr.
¢ M Rn b rR 9]Y6zv6 b ARdi nxl W1[ # bxr w .LLR9 xM lR ¢OA24r Pu
IMGKVwv NKC ZRl r,KIMR1 M IG MY MglµR4VnOtpwp R4rC�i nbIRS 9µA K
GMR/9¢ Yr # OR 6 C.Kn "p # MW xveB M K tlM rear.
C NIDFMDgDID SEPx�
T mr.K -•urX� F #mm" w .1 r T Pewm4iT w. xA,
�wwE w[ m¢xvr nu w u4 a uu� r mma.m"] x14 flK�i Y�n m rm
ttC _ 9x1 I46r4] R Rxravxpq w C 4 y1. ,r ssmout grXIS
Wu4aKPllY 9ra¢ CM6 ,MIDIxY Y6 rOpSMrCll.4 xwr Wr 6 ruarM µnn MR
_ uC . r M rpy4vpp M _
9Fn[Aim CK "K - C"rYtWM �I3- 6�¢GL�i4rtw b�(mWN lWl�"s@C'
Ies�r4Pa wwSRVM�re n[�mlx¢ pM V�K M Smlcr�I.ICRMWO IPar w xm. IDIxK
FINAL PLAT
of
VILLAS AT STONEBRIDGE II
PAMT v TC NPR MT wAx1FR /xYp) aF Kcn¢x 118]11 -MxK (v).
rowxv¢P Rvm -aF 1x11 xw]x. P.w¢ PamRlx 0.1 usr GF r]c UW Wmoux
A SVPMN9}I MMM RIF OlY K D'YA40. TR51 CCUxTY, ITA]F IF CN/JIFW
WAY•m 9NU F R¢C o IODxaG . �91r b U I N W.T . 'A. rR ,OrR w
MM"Z na a M[ sKw >�ro u61q M wviG Z rOlx M cW",¢r Rpxir ]41m
YPoW V # ur"M1 mxZ
bGld WmWr LwQ¢ L¢r /M µ1M1 # 4rP,lgr'P V M ixxYONVn ZF,¢ rI.WR]
ENOM # RS �rlpxPWq#.� WE WLV �.. P/Z A b 06MCRw iJ
n¢vo-m¢ rK w¢ b uwRwoe i.Ri�aR `�"�axm`"wu
rn C.x.K M wcbra K as r•aRZ r,]r9P b . ®r.]m ar mrs i irz o.m m am
POwPSrq RR P tOXRLL'IOIE
OF<MC iRMxNE W[ r LL bN� M VS brv2 .vO M NYP R 6bN1�i.L9m M P[ N]W rWr"�
m[.- m4— rorn,i,u.rWAKTtC.TK
xXCT6 6 WI �MYawp xwwwG W puMC 4ir ]qpb M # rW11E3.6r4rID T M
# x""4T rKrpiwxW Sau]m"FtKwrs nF 4M4mr v a"R•¢Ww ]xrNOx#n RxslgcnxwcnxrM1rwn
M # C.R IDx:R. M afRMr T # b3 mrx2 awt Z RLVbKrE ri M
Nr M Cxq aW. M. M P4u¢ W mN'AMx M r]yRs
bMl KKm�,rM n MR O�M xwTt n rR ,mrR M 0.'IP,CRPS
W
E PAlll I MWMK""Pi b rK Nri xp�M N ¢ MxO:OOr. K OeY1RN[ Cr M aMP 6 M
NXD µD W105('JPIMD MTMI FA4lEHH1g
r�M�mxr a M�•r awt ��¢ rq Ip4r yM � M�MW4:,]�.xw
CGS ttWwGlwr. qr, W O6i4t AAz P M 9 prxIDTr M YN M M
a,ul YZ x49NiFMCPIA�x M PW bII/[0x16
x Xu nm aab K wxrm At rwr M nK r¢r 1.j A
Wr rwr x4 uwKliW mum
MOm4O�r muv4�b4 µRAM M•C 9i4L K PW.RM µ1µs 4xxpV4 Ab M N..Mrt
da4 aoNaL ¢i Allry Tr
_ 2 M1Z�® wxr µMW, auu a wVm ,C nn #.wM¢rm
F 9MNAN5
n �o•ro �w � mnM.n mFwaP aoM wr nm mar xMw �r u anmrK 4.Ma
4 W15 w XD AU£A
W DEIFMTCK PA MT
=M e. FNfOXIAExT. WMT , NrMDYFM SID SEY£PAXN3T
A F]FdiC MT
M RCwpIC r4Rl Zr I4p N¢ bKn4: px wM M 4i Ilv bx. K Wq 4pr M
¢Nl/IwRV0. rR 9 4p 45916 M MPBRR 6 Apr L b9dR 40 urYR]
CX,� rr in 3nM 9Wt WK MM rii Ap alWxY WbGNE ry rjE RM1XK
nEK��xlmxcMwT
Me "� K gRJWr wp nwa4rMr4 4p[q Y K�# Wrt16 M IapM4 V
CAl1LTDYFHT
R fm]wiM •Iln K[Cw ,44wmsp n rK 0.v�•wn4m•xaWMU lRlRm ms"svm"¢ T
"ExWxM K�DI[C IPRr N9 µ"1u1µ uF rN2 aWM4fr RbmC�O blWx'uRw mm4're .R
0. !ENAADNIY
xrxmnu • ImM vow b Mcsi4n aZ oY"ira �rncv�"n a un Paint
11M¢R Ap5 "Yr MM ]Oa5 wMgai 9WL gl4r w M1LL egK,W /R2r.
OPUD No. 22 -022
Zoned RM
LFHTFlCAIE DF DWXFR9R
"nlxp¢ xrP¢(. rA RM x.6bbR. u[ xr pyYXW WIM rnyrr mpyr.
W IOb[IV6bnx 94nZrr4®r 4w P9 MM.TWC R6W �WNR GVrb3
r3W ¢ 1. xMxCpR .
Z]OII rt # JR00d. prYr xK; "xO r0] Za mIm
¢Mi TCPw]] NRM® K xwr w E AA fgRµ
]mow •q MrI4LMC ®.WrdrtmRWR 0N46 "M 16R'rM"Yrbvc0.
Minrtarmns. ra<� ,aYwm¢,w¢y ro u¢ mwr rc eapn¢n b¢ s4R
vn tmun, rm # m. urn n oim ]om�i 4M wurtur 4r rlu t® a
nPYml w x10 xo ZY # Cv.•" rW tT M.'.( nrM
mllnX m a AMLST
t ¢1w x�lM �X� uw axnMx #nu[Mw"wy µHer tMrRr nu
wr 16omubm°FAYf6raR.' a wxs"O.� e1Rm.00�""x.',m1MOrox M`�mE
�Zlx 41uWY.epw.. 54rtM WXny 6,18E x00MCr �AlGbap aXMr.
µ11m MlxP #a4M�WK yqy
wrxrolur ur'o°Y�°c
.nmr
wwrR� R
OO¢ rt M 1.4®4 x •nxn WL n W rK xw m.n,w ¢rK b �q�
MC® mw rL imN u0C w v4Y w K RE miV' l
P.P Y4• n�iwaM W 94 # M�R.w 49.ML Ara
CEXTFIDAM W iMAL PUT APPMAL
l g4r mrRr p nR Mr WiIRMLpw MO4Sb OR mxmbM
T6 xRx 6 Xa I M /v12 fG,lux a ]m MR®K M OR OOC
mom_
NWS AT ST
My 10. W II
JUI
10, ZDPS
aECr x xr 3
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Alexa Beemer, AICP, Planning Manager
SUBJECT:
OPUD 23 -07- 116th Attic Storage
DATE:
February 9, 2024
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department received a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application
(OPUD 23 -07) for 116th Attic Storage, a proposed mixed -use commercial and self - storage development
located at 11111 East 116th Street North, near the southwestern corner of the intersection of East 116th
Street North and North Garnett Road. The subject property is approximately 3.392 acres in size and is
currently zoned Commercial General (CG).
SUBJECT PROPERTY /PROJECT DATA:
Property Size
3.392 acres +/-
Current Zoning
Commercial General (CG)
Proposed Zoning
Commercial General (CG) with PUD Overlay
Present Use
Vacant
Land Use Master Plan
Commercial
Within PUD?
No
Within Overlay District?
No
Water Provider
City of Owasso
Applicable Paybacks
(Assessed at Platting)
Storm Siren Fee ($50.00 per acre)
CONCEPT OF A PUD:
• A PUD is a development concept that allows for greater creativity and flexibility than typically
allowed under traditional zoning and planning practices.
o For example, PUDs often allow developers to place different zonings and land uses in close
proximity to each other.
Developers may also have more flexibility in certain aspects of development, such as
building setback requirements and building height limitations, which can be more
restrictive in standard zoning districts.
A PUD should not be considered as a tool to circumvent the City's Zoning Code and Subdivision
Regulations. All aspects of the PUD application are subject to public comment as well as
consideration and approval from the Community Development Department, the Owasso
Technical Advisory Committee, the Owasso Planning Commission, and the Owasso City Council.
• PUD applications presented to the Planning Commission and City Council are for approval of the
uses and the overall conceptual development plan as it relates to the context of the surrounding
area.
GROWASSO 2035 LAND USE MASTER PLAN CONSISTENCY:
• The GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master Plan is a document that acts as a moderately flexible tool for
evaluating development proposals.
OPUD 23 -07
Page 2
The GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master Plan identifies the property for future commercial land uses.
As such, this proposed mixed -use development is in keeping with the long -range vision for this
location as commercial uses are considered allowed within a "commercial' designation in the
GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master Plan.
ANALYSIS:
The subject property was annexed into Owasso City Limits with Ordinance 259 in 1979 and is
currently unplatted.
Pending approval of this PUD request, the applicant will need to go through the platting
process, as well as all other applicable development - related review processes, prior to
applying for a building permit.
The applicant is seeking a PUD overlay in order to allow for a mix of commercial uses, to include a
proposed self- storage use. The base zoning of CG will remain unchanged for the subject property
under the OPUD 23 -07 request.
o Per Section 6.3.2 of the Owasso Zoning Code, self- storage and warehousing uses may be
allowed within the CG zoning designation provided the development also includes a
separate commercial component and is placed under a PUD. As such, the applicant is
seeking approval of the OPUD 23 -07 request.
• The conceptual site plan submitted for OPUD 23 -07 states that the applicant intends to construct
a mixed -use development, to be developed in two phases.
o Phase 1 would include the southern half of the subject property, and is proposed to
contain self- storage, general retail, and office uses.
o Phase 2 would encompass the northern portion of the subject property and is proposed to
contain self- storage uses.
The proposed allowed uses under OPUD 23 -07 can be considered compatible with adjacent existing
uses, provided that appropriate land use controls and buffering measures are put in place to
minimize impacts on the neighborhood to the west, north, and east of the subject property. Such
controls, as outlined in the OPUD 23 -07 document, include the following:
All structures will be setback a minimum of twenty (20) feet from adjacent property lines; said
setback will also include a required landscaping buffer yard. All perimeter landscaping and
fencing will be required to be installed prior to the completion of Phase 1 of the proposed
development.
All structures along the northern and western perimeters of the subject property, adjacent to
the single - family neighborhood, will be limited to twenty (20) feet in height. Thirty -six (36) feet is
the maximum height allowed in the CG Zoning Designation, per the Owasso Zoning Code;
the interior buildings within the subject property will be allowed to have a height of up to
thirty -six (36) feet.
o Any overhead doors utilized in connection with any warehousing and self- storage uses shall
face the interior of the proposed development, and will not be oriented towards the
adjacent single - family neighborhood.
The OPUD 23 -07 document also states that all applicable landscaping, fencing, and screening
requirements from Ch. 19 of the Owasso Zoning Code will be met. The document also imposes some
additional screening regulations.
OPUD 23 -07
Page 3
o This includes a six (6) foot opaque screening fence, to be installed along the entire perimeter
of the subject property, including adjacent to the existing daycare facility to the east of the
subject property.
o A fully detailed landscape plan will be required to be submitted for City staff approval at the
time of site plan review(s).
• All buildings within the subject property will be required to meet the fagade material requirements
detailed in Chapter 11 of the Owasso Zoning Code, including those requirements that limit the
amount of metal on a given fagade that faces an adjacent residential use to fifty percent (50 %).
a A full set of architectural elevations, showing the proposed fagade materials, will be required
to be submitted for City staff approval at the time of site plan review(s).
• The OPUD 23 -07 document states that the applicant intends to use the existing access point off of
East 1161h Street North to service this proposed development; said access point will also be shared
with the existing daycare facility to the east of the subject property.
a The exact dimensions of both the limits of access and the limits of no access for this proposed
development will be set at the platting stage.
The City of Owasso will provide police, fire, ambulance, water services, and sanitary sewer
services to the subject property.
• Any development that occurs on the subject property shall adhere to all subdivision, zoning, and
engineering requirements of the City of Owasso.
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
Direction
Zoning
Use
Land Use Plan
Jurisdiction
North
Residential Single Family (RS -3)
Residential
Residential
City of Owasso
South
Commercial Shopping (CS)
Vacant
Commercial
City of Owasso
East
Commercial General (CG) /
Residential Single Family (RS -3)
Daycare /
Vacant
Commercial /
Residential
City of Owasso /
Tulsa County
West
Residential Single Family (RS -3)
Residential
Residential
City of Owasso
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Owasso Planning Commission will review this item at their regular meeting on February 12, 2024.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master Plan Map
OPUD 23 -07 Document and Exhibits
h
�a��1•;�� d�. � ✓Q" "•- �1�. <. w 9.°S�'�. `9.``',. -"Lr` `(�^�°j b�~ ti' X" 1 L.�'4j••l9"� �rk-i ' i a� yj'�. .
e .s\� ° �' ,ri �'� �'�" 7 �����" 1'�(y'"S' X41, � 't� ;� � ""'�r`'�- �"zk�%'�� Y • I � �
' 1E "Y'0. +-¢ w??�- ti -*�- -� � =�Ij- � _�'- �I!�j'.'i- y •^�� � �"
47
\���� r^ 'i �°r nw'�•,^� '-`ti- ,'ry,�C�ll` f'�ti,��- f�,��" -}r 9CaN�'�ht 1�`n 'I � Tk����7�,�� -� _ —v� - I , �.;
` f�l SUBJECT TRACT I add
r F a
L r. � j ay n�'�� "-1- i_' � �•_'.1 ry ryq:�..4� ...-h.l.� �- , 'r..,� - t"�` .. � � •� � I•i, I '�, C _
?` ' �.44 rid". a
=`_'� t I'� �p ''�' � .. �^ _gym ,}ra '.{r• r
a ,� .: Y` ' __ •— ..gyvpA � -
� _ a
r�. -,* Ca •..::- .re..y kx� s,-`L y.....; d1�N�. (Le,�J
^� t
�. -�
,�x.1.j�.J
w � � � �(v� ^ r ,�� ro.: C�sTJ lr a .n i, rt " -, --1 •i ��� 1 t � �.
Note: ee a overlays N nt c y t th physical Subject o ioo zoo aoo
features an ground.
Tract OPUD 23 -07 I I I t I 06 21 -14 .{� -�-/
Aerial Photo Date: 2023 Feet
ER
Q �3u�J ff� Gl
Q
�€
IV
1 k 1 1•P1� l
6� fi I
CS
RS -3
w
a
W
2
O
�z
.a ..1
4t I
RS -3
0 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.11 0.14
Mlles
z
r
r
r
2
m
G
m
Surrounding Zoning
OPUD 23 -07
CS
I V
Subject Tract
CS
CS
3
1 'r7y t' t
[� - �aj'�ll�.Yii.:"rj�°
_.•._ �
�� "����^
� 'n'c;'±%`.�'.n
� .�y`y�if"���'�m�lr= c'- �'RJ!e�a
Parks /Recreation
Public /Institutional
Residential
Transitional
Neighborhood Mixed
Redbud District
Neighborhood Commercial
Commercial
Industrial /Regional Employment
® US -169 Overlay
r
t [ �
t • 1
eam i
/epp � wvnF l� 'D[I
� lII 99
s
zln
,I [
-. tin-
all Eq [[Gim[L��Y��
a'4f (!' iPr rHP I s� 1101 -1 11 IL
r r,pr rl ",0 .•re
r tea.:
0 0.02 0." 0.07 0.11 0.14 GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master Plan
Mlles OPUD 23 -07
I
ro — � N
Subject Tract N
OPUD 23 -07
1161 Attic Storage
City of Owasso, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Owner / Developer
Jarrod Huneryager
PO Box 397
Owasso, OK 74055
Preparer
Route 66 Engineering
P.O Box 409
Sapulpa, OK 74067
I.
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ..........................................................................
..............................1
II.
STATISTICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................
..............................2
III.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ....................................................................
..............................2
IV.
LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE ............................................................
..............................3
V.
SIDEWALKS ...................................................................................................
..............................3
VI.
SIGN STANDARDS ........................................................................................
..............................4
VII.
SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT .................................................................
..............................4
VIII.
ACCESS POINTS ............................................................................................
..............................4
IX.
LIGHTING STANDARDS ..............................................................................
..............................4
X.
MECHANICAL AND DUMPSTER SCREENING .........................................
..............................4
Exhibits
Exhibit A — Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit B — Existing Conditions Plan
Exhibit C — Existing Zoning and Land Use Plan
Exhibit D — Soils Map
Exhibit E - Conceptual Building Elevations
I. Development Concept
Attic Storage (the "Development') is a proposed ±3.39 -acre self - storage development located in
the SE /4 Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 14 East of the I.B. &M. according to the U.S.
Government Survey thereof, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, being more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at the SE corner of the SEA of said Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 14 East
of the I.B. &M. thence S88 °53'50 "W along the South line of said SEA a distance of 1002.81 feet;
thence N01'08'50" W a distance of 54.00 feet the point of beginning, being on the present right -
of -way of East 116`h Street North; thence NO1 008'50 "W a distance of 347.28 feet; thence
N88 °53'50 "E a distance of 150.00 feet; thence NO1 °08'50 "W a distance of 258.87 feet to the
boundary of Country Estates, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence S88 °53'50 "W along
said boundary of Country Estates a distance of 330.00 feet; thence SO1 °08'50 "E along said
boundary of Country Estates a distance of 605.65 feet to the present right -of -way of East 116"'
Street North; thence N88 °53'50 "E along said right -of -way a distance of 180.00 feet to the point of
beginning and containing 3.392 acres, more or less.
The subject property has approximately 180 Linear Feet "LF" of frontage along East 116`' Street
North.
Underlying CG zoning will remain unchanged.
The subject Property is abutted:
a) on the north by Country Estates zoned RS -3 Residential;
b) on the east (adjacent tract) by Country Estates zoned RS -3 Residential, and The
Mennonite Brethren Church zoned RS -3 Residential;
c) on the south by East 116th Street North. Property south of East 116th Street North
is CS -zoned OPUD 23 -04;
d) on the west by Country Estates zoned RS -3 Residential with the exception of a
portion that is unincorporated Tulsa County which is governed by Tulsa County
Zoning Code.
The Subject Property is characterized by fairly flat terrain, with drainage generally flowing from
the southwest to the northeast (See Exhibit `B" — Existing Conditions Plan). There is no on -site
FEMA 100 -year floodplain or USACE jurisdictional wetlands.
The soil types found on the Subject Property (See Exhibit "D" — Soils Man) site are typical for
the area and should pose no unusual developmental problems. The location of the PUD has very
favorable accessibility, location and visibility from surrounding roadways.
The Development will feature seven (8) self - storage buildings and one (1) building with a
combination of self - storage, Food and Beverage Store and three (3) Office store fronts.
Access into the Subject Property will be from East 116a` Street North. The access point into the
self - storage is conceptually as shown on Exhibit "A" — Conceptual Site Plan. A mutual access
easement will be established for ingress and egress through existing daycare parcel.
The Subject Property will be platted.
It is anticipated that the Development may be developed in multiple phases, with development
commencing as soon as the appropriate approvals have been received.
GrOwasso 2035 Land Use Master plan designates the subject property as Commercial. The
proposed use falls in line
H. Statistical Summary
Total Project Area 3.39 acres
Total Building Area for Commercial /Office 2,320 sf
Total Building Area for Warehouse /Self - Storage Area 68,775 sf
Total Area Designated for Improvement 121,353 sf
Total Open Space Area 26,315 sf
Maximum Commercial Floor Area
III. Development Standards
Permitted Uses:
Max Commercial Floor Area:
Min Lot Size:
Min Lot Frontage:
On East I I6`h Street North:
Min Building Setbacks:
From East 116`" St N:
As Permitted within the CG Zoning District.
Uses permitted by right in the CG Zoning District.
Those uses requiring a Specific Use Permit (SUP),
in the CG Zoning District will need to secure an
SUP.
Warehousing/Self- Storage use is allowed when
accompanied by a retail or office component.
As permitted within the CG Zoning District.
As permitted within the CG Zoning District.
Fifty feet (50'). The width of the drive aisle to the
Development will be no less than twenty -four feet
(24').
Twenty -five feet (25')
From West: Twenty feet (201)
2
From North:
From East:
Twenty feet (20')
Twenty feet (20')
Max Building Height: Twenty feet (20') for any Warehousing and Self -
Storage Uses along northern, western and eastern
boundaries. Interior buildings have a max building
height of thirty-six feet (361).
Building Architecture Design Standards: Front, rear, and side facades shall be designed as
permitted per "Section 11.6 Building Architecture
Design Standards" the City of Owasso Zoning
Code.
Other Bulk & Area Rea.:
Freestanding Signage:
Building Signage:
Access Point:
As permitted within the CG Zoning District.
As permitted within the CG Zoning District.
As permitted within the CG Zoning District.
The sole point of access to and from the
Development shall be from East 116th Street North.
Other Standards: Any overhead doors utilized in connection with any
Warehousing and Self- Storage uses shall face the
interiorof the Development.
Any fencing or screening utilized in connection
with any Warehousing and Self- Storage uses shall
be in accordance with the City of Owasso Zoning
Code. A minimum 6' fence shall be required along
the north, east, and west boundaries, as well as, the
interior boundary between proposed storage units
and existing daycare use. Existing fence may be
utilized adjacent to single family homes. Fence
shall be maintained by property owner of parcel for
OPUD 23 -07.
IV. Landscaning and Open Space
Except as modified herein, landscaping shall be provided in accordance with "Chapter 19
— Landscaping, Screening and Fencing Requirements" of the City of Owasso Zoning Ordinance.
Prior to final permitting approval, the owner shall submit a landscape plan along with its proposed
site plan for review and approval by the City of Owasso in accordance with "Chapter 19 —
Landscaping, Screening and Fencing Requirements of the City of Owasso Zoning Ordinance.
All perimeter landscaping must be installed prior to completion of phase 1 retail or office
component.
V. Sidewalks
All sidewalks will meet the City of Owasso Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations.
VI. Sign Standards
Must adhere to Owasso Zoning Code Chapter 18.
VII. Schedule of Development
The initial development of 116th Attic Storage is expected to commence after final approval of
the PUD, the platting of the property, site plan approval, engineering plan approval, and OFD
approval.
The required commercial component will be constructed prior to any warehousing /self storage
use.
VIII. Access Points
Access to the development shall be shown on and approved as part of the plat process and must
conform to Owasso Zoning Code and City of Owasso engineering criteria. In furtherance thereof:
The development will share access with the adjacent property to the east. This access point is on
East 116"' Street North.
IX. Lighting Standards
Must adhere to Owasso Zoning Code Chapter 20. All facing residential must have full cutoff
fixture shields with no more than 0.5 maintained foot candles at any property line adjacent to a
residential single - family district.
X. Mechanical and Dumnster Screening
All mechanical and dumpster screening shall be in accordance with Chapter 19 of the Owasso
Zoning Code. No trash enclosures are allowed along property line shared with single - family
residential.
4
EXHIBIT A
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
'®
®.
14�, pz4an9d
I0:4:II
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
..M
)DH nw.�m.uc
P8 M ]w
Aaq R 1.W]
awcweM
xeuceR up�.anrt. Ric
Gab Srp.pBp pmY
Ey. oem Yn v, Nis
sURl R
Bensmu39nrxN`96
• leib Ni -wee
N
iq ms
IeMl0.alpbn
PRELIMINARY PLAT
of
JDH Properties
•I 4 Sec &T -YFH XMS L 4� /fPN
., WDR PROPERTIES �I3Spp1 /ILT
I
--
J
NOT A PART �_�°° ° °•w.w
OOF. OPUD 23,07
EXHIBIT B
EXISTING CONDITIONS mx raeP.w.
PLAN
EXHIBIT C
EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN
BASE CG ZONING
WILL REMAIN
EXHIBIT C
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE PLAN
EXHIBIT D
SOILS MAP
USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Tulsa County,
Oklahoma
Attic Owasso
January 30, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps/
portal /nres /main /soils /healthn and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
( https : / /offices.sc.egov.usda.gov /locator /app ?agency =nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal /nres /detail /soils /contactus /?
cid =nres 142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720 -2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250 -9410 or
call (800) 795 -3272 (voice) or (202) 720 -6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
Contents
Preface..................................................................................... ...............................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made .................................................... ..............................5
SoilMap ................................................................................... ...............................
8
SoilMap .................................................................................. ..............................9
Legend................................................................................... .............................10
MapUnit Legend ................................................................. ...............................
11
MapUnit Descriptions ............................................................ .............................11
Tulsa County, Oklahoma .................................................... .............................13
15— Dennis - Pharoah complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes .... .............................13
43— Okemah silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ................. .............................15
Soil Information for All Uses .................................................. .............................17
Soil Properties and Qualities ............................................... ...............................
17
Soil Qualities and Features ................................................ .............................17
Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso) ............................ .............................17
References, ...........................................................................................................
22
Cl
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil- vegetation - landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and /or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil - landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil - landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field- observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
a6° W2FN
W 19'H'N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map h
a
3
b,
Map Sale: 1:1,180 fpdnted on A portrait (8.5" x I1') stet
N Meters
0 15 w W 90
A r
Map piojecbm: Web Menator Gom c"dimtes: WG584 Edge tim: UIM Zone 15N W 584
9
36° 19'1B'N
]MO'A 249R]�
3
H
a
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area m Interest
(A01)
g
spell A+ea
The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at
O
Aea of lmerest(A01)
Q
Stony Spot sP ot
1:12,000.
Sells
(]
Sail Map Unit Polygons
m
Very Story Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet spa
w
sail Map urn ones
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping cause
9 P Y
S
SeO Map Unit Palms
A
other
misunderstanding detail ot mapping and acurac of sail
ihps
spedal Line Features
macwras
Me placement. do
mtThe maps do not show the small areas
Spacial
Point Features
Ma
d
contrasting soils Thal wultl have been shown at a mom tlatallad
l°2
Blowout
Water FeaNras
Scale.
Streams and Canals
®
Borrow Pi
Transportation
lease rely an the bar scale an each map sheet for map
Clay Spot
+i-a
falls
measurements.
0
closed Depreaslan
ti
Interstate Highways
Source Map: Natural Resources COnsarvallan Service
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Web Sol[
Web Soil Survey URL:
Orovel,Spot
Coordinate System: Web Mercalor(EPSG3857)
„
Major Roads
Landfill
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Sail Survey are based on the Web Mercator
R
Lava Ft.
pmjecllon, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh orswamp
®
Aerial Photography
Albers equal -area conic projedion, should be used if more
.'�'.
Mine or Quarry
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Qp
Miscellaneous Water
This product is generated from the USDA -MRCS cerlified data as
®
Perennial Water
etthe version dialogist listed below.
V
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Tulsa County, Oklahoma
+
Saline Spot
Survey Area Dala: Version 19, Saps, 2025
sturdy Spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map swiss
t3
severely Eraded Spot
1:5o,00o or larger.
Sinkhole
Date(s) aerial Images were photographed: May 11, 2022 —May
Slldeor Slip
14, 2022
$
Soaic spot
The odhophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Imagery displayed on these maps. Asa result, some minor
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AOI
Percent of Act
15
Dennis - Pharoah complex, 1 to
3 percent slopes
3.1
60.8%
43
Okemah silt loam, 0 to 1
percent slopes
2.0
39.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Tulsa County, Oklahoma
15— Dennis - Pharoah complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2wgf6
Elevation: 560 to 980 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 43 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 61 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 220 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dennis and similar soils: 70 percent
Pharoah and similar soils., 20 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dennis
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two- dimensional): Summit, shoulder, footslope
Landform position (three- dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Silty and clayey residuum weathered from shale
Typical profile
A - 0 to 10 inches: silt
loam
BA - 10 to 20 inches:
silty clay loam
Btl - 20 to 25 inches:
silty clay
Bt2 - 25 to 62 inches:
silty clay
C - 62 to 79 inches:
silty clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 1 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in /hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos /cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: R112XY103KS -Loamy Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Pharoah
Setting
Landform: Paleoterraces
Landform position (three- dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium over residuum weathered from shale
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam
BA - 7 to 12 inches: silty clay loam
Btl - 12 to 23 inches: silty clay
Bt2 - 23 to 47 inches: silty clay
Bt3 - 47 to 59 inches: clay
BC - 59 to 79 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 1 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Low to moderately low
(0.00 to 0.06 in /hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 2 percent
Gypsum, maximum content: 2 percent
Maximum salinity., Slightly saline to moderately saline (4.0 to 8.0 mmhos /cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 13.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Ecological site: R112XY102KS -Clayey Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Parsons
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Divides
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three- dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Ecological site: R112XY101 KS - Claypan Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
43— Okemah silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vwfz
Elevation: 610 to 920 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 46 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period.- 190 to 220 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Okemah and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components. 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit.
Description of Okemah
Setting
Landform: Paleoterraces
Landform position (three - dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey and loamy colluvium or alluvium over clayey residuum
weathered from shale
Typical profile
A1- 0 to 14 inches: silt loam
A2 - 14 to 18 inches: silty clay loam
Bt - 18 to 47 inches: silty clay
BC - 47 to 79 inches: silty clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in /hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 2 percent
Gypsum, maximum content: 2 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos /cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
15
Custom Soil Resource Report
Ecological site: R112XY103KS - Loamy Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Summit
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two- dimensional): Backslope, footslope
Landform position (three- dimensional): Base slope
Down -slope shape: Concave, convex
Across -slope shape: Concave
Ecological site: R112XY103KS - Loamy Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
Pharoah
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Paleoterraces
Landform position (three- dimensional): Tread
Down -s lope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R112XY102KS - Clayey Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
Parsons
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Divides
Landform position (two- dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three - dimensional): Intertluve
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Ecological site: R112XY101 KS - Claypan Upland
Hydric soil rating: No
16
Soil Information for All Uses
Soil Properties and Qualities
The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and
qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in
the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated
by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This
aggregation process is defined for each property or quality.
Soil Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly
measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil
properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil
features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features
include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the
use and management of the soil.
Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso)
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long- duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate.rate of water transmission.
M
Custom Soil Resource Report
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at
or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
18
W 19'26 -N
M' 19'IWN
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map — Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso)
P a
24 Z439N 299000 0,9Vl0 2G901t ?49�
3 ;
Map Sole: 1:1.380 fiPMkM onA p0rtak(8.5"x1I")dieeL
H
N Mks
0 ,s 30 60 W
A �
`
U 93 ,00 300
Map P:oecbon: Web Mwmt x C cx dmbm W(584 Ede 80s: UrM Zo35N
VANN
19
2
IV 39'M'N
W 1VWN
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Ara of Interest (A01)
®
C
The Bail surveys that comprise your Act were mapped at
❑
Area of Interest (A01)
■
cm
1:12,000.
sag:
Son RaBnp Polygons
■
C
Warning: Sall Map may not be valid at this scale.
❑
A
0
NO rated or nat evenness
Water Features
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
r7
Aso
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of sail
❑
e
Streams and Canals
line placement. The maps do not show life small areas of
Trans ermtlon
conbasling sails that could have been shown at a more detailed
s+r
Ran.
scale.
❑
C
.y
Interstate Highways
❑
=
Please rely an the bar scale on each map wheel for map
/
US ROUbB
measurements.
❑
D
Maor Roads
❑
N olraladarmaevanebla
Source Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Local Roads
Web Sall Survey URL:
Soil Rating hies
Background
Coordinate System: Web Mereator(EPSG:3857)
A
parted Photography
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are bad on the utab Mercator
^^
yvD
projection, which preserves direction and d shape but tlistons
B
distance and area. A protection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equa4ma conic projection, should be used H more
ry
Dm
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
N
C
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as
N
CN
of the version dale(s) listed below.
..
D
Soil Survey Area: Tulsa County, Oklahoma
. r
Not rated or not available
Survey Area Data: Vem1Dn 19, Sep 8, 2023
8011 Rating Points
■
A
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
■
AnD
■
g
Dales) renal images were photographed: May 11, 2022 —May
—
14,2022
■
flm
The onhophoto or other base map on which the sail lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Imagery displayed an these maps. As a result, some minor
20
Custom Soil Resource Report
Table— Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso)
Rating Options — Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff..- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
21
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Aces In AOI
Percent of AOI
15
Dennis- Pharoah
complex, 1 to 3
percent slopes
C/D
3.1
60.8%
43
Okemah silt loam, 0 to 1
percent slopes
CID
2.0
39.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.0
100.0%
Rating Options — Hydrologic Soil Group (Attic Owasso)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff..- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
21
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487 -00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS /OBS- 79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal/
nres / detail /national /soils / ?cid =nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http: //
www.n res. usda.gov /wps /portal /nres/ detail /national /soils / ?cid =nres l42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http: //
www. n res. usda.gov /wps /portal /nres /detail /national /soils / ?cid =n res l42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y -87 -1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal /nres /detail /soils/
home / ?cid =n res 142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. hftp: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal /nres/
detail /national /landuse /rangepastu re/ ?cid= stelprdb 1043084
22
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal/
nres /detail /soi Is /scientists / ?cid =nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal /nres /detail /national/soils /?
cid =nres 142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/internet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2�_052290.pdf
23
EXHIBIT E
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS
444444444444
El
--
Q
W�
0,,7-
Z
17 I
l
-
1 PHASE I, BLDG A -SOUTH
�ELEVATION
Lu
o�
U) �o
a �o
'z PHASE 1, BLDG A- WEST ELEVATION
'3 PHASE 1,
BLDG A- EAST ELEVATION
❑
�4
-4TQ
Q4
-TT77
4 PHASE I, BLDG A -NORTH ELEVATION
-A2.0
eo
BI
B3
B) N as
EeY n
96
es
eio
01,
❑
Z
1 PHASE 1, BLDG B - EAST ELEVATION
j
`w,
BB
BL
BL BE BF
G 6N
BI
�w/
Lend
0L
W
Z PHASE 1, BLDG B- SOUTH ELEVATION
Q
oil 7
v
BB
Q Q
Bew
Bs
o
Bf
eo
yK �p
d.
Gam^
FV HN
PHASE 1, BLDG B WEST ELEVATION
-
3
BL
B%
Lw/
BI BN BG
BF B
BG
Le,.�
Lee/
nom.
114 PHASE 1, BLDG B - NORTH ELEVATION
g_p2,0
❑
_QT.."
U
7
f0
1 PHASE 1, BLDG C - EAST ELEVATION
Y Y �Y Y c°
ce cr ce cs Q (? (cil a co
_
ww
0 WY
„e,,,,� i I
(0.0
w
LU Nyy
FQ
2 PHASE 1, BLDG C - WEST ELEVATION
ce u
PHASE 1, BLDG C- NORTH ELEVATION
4 PHASE 1, BLDG C - SOUTH ELEVATION
GA2.0
rJwA
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: H. Dwayne Henderson. P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Travel with Care: SS4A Implementation Project - Project Financing,
Subcontracting, Construction Agreement Between the INCOG and the City of
Owasso
DATE: February 9, 2024
BACKGROUND:
In June 2022, the Indian Nations Council of Governments ( INCOG) sent letters to member entities
that the United States Secretary of Transportation announced a funding opportunity called Safe
Streets and Roads for All (SS4A). The purpose of this notice was to solicit applications for the
grant program to be awarded on a competitive basis to support planning, infrastructure,
behavioral, and operational initiatives to prevent death and serious injury on roads and streets
involving all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation, personal
conveyance, and micro - mobility users, motorists, and commercial vehicle operators.
Applications were due September 15, 2022, with INCOG leading the application efforts.
INCOG approached five (5) member communities about collectively applying for these funds.
The initial entities invited to participate were: Cities of Tulsa, Broken Arrow, Jenks, Owasso and
Tulsa County. However, other entities were added later.
Individual grants could be awarded for projects from $200,000 to $1,000,000. However,
metropolitan planning organizations, like INCOG, could collectively apply for $5,000,000-
$30,000,000, The S54A funding is limited to 80% of the total grant, which local entities would need
to participate with a 20% match.
The award of funds was announced in early 2024. Funding was awarded to the INCOG
metropolitan planning organization as follows:
Total Funds - $21,200,000 (of the $30,000,000 max)
Local Funds Obligated - $5,300,000
Federal Funds to City of Owasso - $800,000
City of Owasso Local Match Required - $200,000
OWASSO PROJECTS:
The applications were submitted in September 2022. The City of Owasso selected several
projects to complete, which included:
• Midblock Pedestrian Crossing with HAWK Beacon* (2) $350,000
• Flashing Yellow Arrow Traffic Signal Heads* (34) $ 51,000
• Upgrade Stop- Controlled Intersections to LED* (10) $ 15,000
• Post Mounted Speed Feedback Signs* (40) $ 60,000
• Roadway Striping $524,000
*Example included in Attachments
Travel with Care: SS4A Implementation Project
Page 2
Final locations have not been determined since construction funds will not be available until
2025. In addition, the consultant will help determine the best location for each component.
Because the projects were funded as part of the metropolitan planning organization each
project phase has to be completed together. The first step is for the metropolitan planning
organization to select one (1) consultant to help with site selection /design of the new signalized
safety items. For the City of Owasso, the recommendations and design of the HAWK beacons
will require consultant involvement. The remainder of the items will be performed in- house.
Consultants will be interviewed in February 2024 and one selected. Once selected, the
consultant will enter into an agreement with the metropolitan planning organization and begin
design. Project phasing is as follows:
1) Prior to March 12, 2024 - metropolitan planning organization entities approve agreement
with INCOG
2) March 12, 2024 - INCOG approves agreement with selected metropolitan planning
organization entities
3) Prior to 7/l/2024 - Start Preliminary Design and Environmental Clearance (aka: NEPA *)
4) 7/1 /2025 -Start Final Design
5) 7/1/2026 - Start Construction
6) 6/30 /2028 - Construction Completion
* ODOT has agreed to clear the NEPA for all projects
Each entity has to be completed with each project phase before anyone can move to the next
phase. So, working together will be crucial to meeting the grant requirements.
PROJECT FINANCING, SUBCONTRACTING, CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT:
The agreement between the City of Owasso and INCOG is being drafted. A summary of the
anticipated conditions are as follows:
Engineering Responsibilities - The City is responsible for selecting the project, sharing them with
the engineer and assuring the plans are prepared timely and the meet the Americans with
Disability Act (ADA). City will design of the striping and signage portion of the project.
Riaht-of Way Acquisition Responsibilities - City shall make sure all right -of -way and /or easements
are acquired using ODOT's guidelines for Right -of -Way Acquisition on Federal -Aid Projects.
Utility Relocation Responsibilities - City shall be responsible for relocating utilities to clear
construction.
Construction Responsibilities - City agrees to comply with all applicable laws and regulations
necessary to meet the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) requirements for
stormwater pollution. The City of Owasso shall provide Construction Administration/ Inspection
Services. City shall provide maintenance on all of the equipment provided and installed by this
project.
Travel with Care: SS4A Implementation Project
Page 3
Funding Responsibilities - City agrees that the project will be financed at a not -to- exceed
amount and the estimated cost is described below:
PROPOSED ACTION:
An item has been placed on the February 13, 2024, Worksession for City Council discussion.
ATTACHMENTS:
September 9, 2022, Obligation Letter for the City of Owasso to INCOG
Example of Projects
INCOG SS4A
CITY LOCAL
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL ESTIMATED
COST
SHARE %
AMOUNT
SHARE %
AMOUNT
Preliminary
Engineering & NEPA
$50,000
80%
$40,000
20%
$10,000
Final Design
$37,500
80%
$30,000
20%
7,500
Construction
$912,500
80%
$730,000
20%
$182,500
TOTAL
$1,000,000
TOTAL
$800,000 1
TOTAL
$200,000
PROPOSED ACTION:
An item has been placed on the February 13, 2024, Worksession for City Council discussion.
ATTACHMENTS:
September 9, 2022, Obligation Letter for the City of Owasso to INCOG
Example of Projects
s�
REAL PooPlo • RFAL CIW PKb,• REAL Commonly
Q.bsfa Clas
sancfinc
in 't`.Na b+12.'J
o, people
Celebrating
ti'lair lives.
T
September 9, 2022
Honorable Pete Buttigieg
Secretary of Transportation
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590
RE: Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant application— Indian Nation Council of
Government (INCOG) "Travel With Care" Safety Project
Dear Secretary Buttigieg,
In 2015, the Owasso City Council voted unanimously to approve the establishment of a Complete
Streets policy. In fact, we are one among the first few jurisdictions within the Tulsa TMA that has
adopted a Complete Streets policy. It was and still is important to the City of Owasso to ensure
that everyone, no matter their mode of transportation, be able to arrive back home to their
families safely.
Our new standard for capital improvement projects is to create an 8' side -path on one side of the
street, a 5' sidewalk on the other, and bike lanes. Our speed limits on our arterial roads are signed
at 35 mph, citywide. This shows that Owasso is committed to making our streets safer for our
residents, not just passing a policy. Despite these improvements to our transportation system,
there are still crashes and fatalities for both vulnerable road users and people in automobiles. Even
one loss of life on our public streets is unacceptable. This is why we are fully committed to
implementing our common vision, the INCOG's newly adopted Local Road Safety Plan.
The City of Owasso will commit to a local match of $200,000 to the SS4A grant to implement the
safety plan in our jurisdiction. FHWA countermeasures we intend to employ are LED lit stop signs,
improved striping and signage, updated continental crosswalks, and accessible pedestrian signals
to help people with disabilities to navigate safely across our streets.
Please accept this letter of support and financial commitment from the City of Owasso, contingent
upon City Council approval. As City Manager, I look forward to collaborating with INCOG and our
regional neighbors to implement the Travel With Care Safety Project.
Regar
W rren Lehr
City Manager
200 S Main St 1 918- 376 -1500
PO Box 180 City of Owasso FAX 918- 376 -1599
Owasso, OK 74055 A City Of Character www.cilyofowcsso.com
l
.`�I
/�
I.
M
/ Iti�
�''�.
i
n�
/ _ _ � _
�.
li
Y ®�
1d— l�
_�__ -�
r`
//
7
_�__ -�
Steady Red Arrow
Steady Yellow Arrow
Drivers turning left
should prepare to stop.
Flashing Yellow Arrow
Drivers turning left may
proceed after yielding to
oncoming traffic and pedestrians.
ii i�
0
�O�
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
sd
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Juliann M. Stevens, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Appointment of Deputy City Clerk
DATE: February 9, 2024
BACKGROUND:
On May 1, 2018, the City Council appointed Chris Garrett to serve as the Deputy City Clerk. The
designation of a Deputy City Clerk allows for official City documents to be signed in the absence of the
City Clerk. Mr. Garrett will begin his new role as City Manager on March 2, 2024, creating the need to
appoint a Deputy City Clerk.
While the City Charter is silent on the appointment of a Deputy City Clerk, historically such appointments
have been made by City Council action. An item has been placed on the February 13, 2024 Worksession
agenda to discuss staff's recommendation for such appointment.
* *RED - Councilor Dunn's suggestions
** PURPLE - Vice Mayor Fruga's suggestions
** GREEN — City Attorney provisions from other Codes of Ethics
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Comoliance with all Laws
City Council members shall comply with the laws of the United States, the State of Oklahoma
and the City of Owasso in the performance of their public duties. Such laws include but are not
limited to: the United States and State of Oklahoma Constitutions, the City of Owasso Charter,
laws pertaining to conflicts of interest, election campaigns, financial disclosures, open meeting
law, open records law, the City of Owasso Code of Ordinances and all policies adopted by the
City Council.
Integrity and Accuracy
City Council members are expected to perform their duties with alasely#e complete integrity. No
member of the City Council shall under any circumstances make a statement for any purpose
that is known by the member to be inaccurate or intended to be misleading
** "absolute integrity" could be changed to either "uncompromising integrity" or "the utmost
integrity ". The former is used in the first paragraph and first sentence under "Now, Therefore... ".
So using it again here would keep it consistent.
Conduct of Members
It is acceptable and expected that City Council members may disagree about issues brought
before the Council. However, it is not acceptable for any City Council member to make
derogatory comments and gestures about other Council members, their opinions or their
actions. City Council members shall refrain from exhibiting abusive conduct, personal
allegations or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of the City
Council, members of City boards or commissions, the staff and the public.
City Council members shall, to
the best of their ability, serve the citizens of the City of Owasso conscientiously and with honesty
and impartiality. City Council members shall seek to perform their duties with diligence,
efficiency and courtesy. Members of the City Council shall each make impartial decisions
based upon consideration and analysis of the facts, circumstances, merits and laws of each
case without taking into account unrelated considerations.
** Second paragraph, first sentence, I might suggest changing ".shall avoid" to "seek to avoid
Electronic Devices Durina Meetinas
In the spirit of the Open Meeting Act and in furtherance of the City Council's commitment to
conducting government business with as much order and transparency as possible, councilors
shall conduct themselves during official meetings with attentiveness and without outside
distraction
mode d g City Qe I rR efiR Use Of eI8GfFGR G d,-. by Qf Q 'I PAeMbe-9 fQF
It is the City Council's intent to prohibit electronic communications
between members of the Council and other persons during City Council meetings. Prohibiting
communications of this type enables the Council to operate with maximum transparency and
allows the Council to avoid any appearance or perception of engaging in discussions or
deliberations not open to the public during City Council meetings.
** something like the following to replace this entire section:
While it is a common and acceptable practice for council members to use an electronic
device like an iPad, Notepad, or similar to follow council meeting agendas in place of a
paper copy, excessive use of cell phones or any other electronic device for talking,
texting, email or otherwise during council meetings is, except for emergencies,
prohibited. (Insert last sentence of existing doc that starts with "Prohibiting
communications of this type... ")
Respect for Process
City Council members shall perform their duties with the processes and rules of order established
by the City Council. Upon a "Call to Order" of the City Council meeting, Councilors will respect
that a meeting is in progress and recognize that it is inappropriate to temporarily exit the
meeting unless a recess or adjournment has been called by the mayor. While a meeting is in
progress, Council members should refrain from having "side bar" conversations with each other
or with city staff.
Public Meetings
City Council members have the right to personally endorse candidates for all City Council seats
and other elected offices. However, it is inappropriate to mention endorsements during City
Council meetings or other official City meetings or hearings.
City Council members shall prepare themselves for discussions of public issues brought before
the City Council. City Council members shall listen courteously and attentively to all discussion
and comment on the issue by the public, City staff and other City Council members. City
Council members shall refrain from interrupting other speakers unless compelled to do so to
ensure compliance with City Council policies or processes for public meetings and shall
additionally refrain from interfering with the orderly conduct of City Council meetings.
Conflict of Interest
Any member of the City Council who has a conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, in any
matter brought before the City Council for consideration or action shall declare and disclose the
conflict of interest to the City Council and shall not participate in discussion or voting on the
matter. ik FenAnt Pf imlerorf shall he d fRRGI GI G °+a+ tG +I• + f infArP4 •+ +•
mob. r f'.. Gl iRtAre4 +hr.+ hr.o +h r, .- ...+.. +' I the Qt r '1 GPiRiGR a
. A conflict of interest involves any
action, inaction, or decision by a city councilor in the discharge of his or her official duties which
would materially affect his or her financial interest or those of his or her family members or any
business with which the councilor is associated or has an ownership interest.
The minutes of a meeting wherein a declaration of a conflict was made shall not record a vote
on behalf of a City Council member who leaves the room during discussion and voting upon the
issue. The minutes of such meeting shall, however, record a "no" vote if the City Council
member remains in the room and abstains from voting, such recordation being in accordance
With Oklahoma State Law and the Owasso Code of Ordinances.
Gifts and Favors
City Council members shall not directly or indirectly solicit, receive or accept any gift if 1) a
reasonable inference could be drawn that the gift was intended to influence them in the
performance of their official duties, or, 2) the gift is intended to serve as a reward or in
appreciation of any official action taken by the City Council member. City Council members
shall not solicit or accept any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits which might compromise
the independent judgment and action s• `•'h' ^h Might giVe the vNpeura^ce of berry
serxPreraised. City Council members shall not take special advantage of services or
opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public offices that are not available to the
public in general.
Political Fundraising Activities
No City Council member shall use his or her position, authority or influence, whether actually
possessed or anticipated, to interfere with or affect the results of an election or to obtain a
political or other type contribution. City Council members shall not use or attempt to use any
political endorsement in connection with any appointment to any City board or commission.
These rules are not intended to preclude City Council members from political fundraising
activities, but to ensure that these activities are undertaken only at private initiative and
expenses in their role as private citizens and thus do not reflect upon the official activities of the
City.
6emmuniea#ie14
PFGGess.
3
Confidential Information
City Council members shall respect and preserve the confidentiality of information concerning
the property, personnel or affairs of the City. City Council members shall neither disclose
confidential information without proper legal authorization nor use such information in any way
to advance or further their personal, financial or private gain. Confidential Information shall not
include any information that is or becomes publicly available other then as a result of disclosure
by Recipient, which is disclosed by any third -party not known by Recipient, and who Recipient
has no reason to believe to be under any contractual or fiduciary obligation not to disclose such
information; was in the Recipient's possession prior to disclosure, or is independently developed
by the Recipient.
Advocacy
City Council members shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council to the
best of their ability when designated as delegates or representatives of the City. ifs C-4
. When a City Council member is not acting
in their official capacity of city councilor or as a delegate or representative of the City, their
comments, discussions and opinions do not represent the City of Owasso or the City Council and
councilors should refrain from representing or implying anything to the contrary.
Policy Role of Citv Council Members
City Council members shall respect and adhere to the Council- Manager form of municipal
government implemented in the City of Owasso through its charter and as outlined in Title 1 I of
the Oklahoma Statutes. The Council- Manager form of government provides for the City Council
to determine all matters of policy for the City of Owasso Additionally, the Council- Manager
form of municipal government provides that the City Manager shall be responsible for all day -to-
day operations of the City. Accordingly, City Council members shall not interfere with or impair
the ability of the City Manager and other City staff to determine and implement day -to -day
operational matters.
Implementation of Code of Ethics and Conduct
This Code of Ethics and Conduct is intended to be self- enforcing by members of the City
Council. City Council members shall be thoroughly familiarwith this Code and shall make every
reasonable effort to adhere to its provisions. The Code of Ethics and Conduct shall be included
in the orientation training for newly elected City Council members. All City Council members
shall sign a statement affirming they have read and understand the City of Owasso Code of
Ethics and Conduct.
** add something at the end that makes it clear that "any official meetings or communications
City Councilors desire to have with City Staff should be scheduled through the City Manager."
Just to make sure that the chain of communication is understood.
4
Censure
Any member accused of a substantial violation of Council rules, or any other general law, shall
have the right to present a defense to the allegations, including the right to present rebuttal
evidence, and to have representation by legal counsel.
Upon finding, by a moral certainty, that a substantial violation has occurred, and that such
violation affects the Council member's ability to represent the interests of the city as a whole, the
Council may, upon unanimous vote of Council members, other than the Council member
subject to censure proceedings, impose a proper sanction.
DATED this 16th day of September, 2014. /s /Mayor, Jeri Moberly
February 2024 Sales 8 Use Tax Report
. Puepla • aEN.CMraLr• fGALCwn,puNly
Total Monthly Sales Tax Comparison
u,so0,coa
u,000,aoo
..,.00,000
•��� - -�
50,wa,ao0
i
'
$1,506,000
32.00.00
$1.00,000
$1,000,000
sso0,000
a
Jui Aug eep Oti Nov Dee Jul Feb Mar ryr May Jun
- i -llr4e - . -eu"d tLaal Yer
Year -to -Date Sales Tax Total
Sso,o0o,0o0
SISA66,6o6
uo,0o0,aw
50000%000
i
'
550A60,060
525,6O6,600
$20AOM0o0
$15,000,006
s10,0uo,6o0
55A60A66
F
Jul Aug sap Od Nw N. Jan Fab Mat /ipr MaY Ju6
�MCUa •�BUJpet - �lalriv
City of Owasso
Total Sales & Use Tax Report
Budget to Actual Comparison
February 9, 2024
2023 -24
2023 -24
Actual Collections
Budget Projections
Over (Under) Projection
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Jul
$ 4,295,419
8.9%
$ 4,082,105
8.4%
$ 213,315
5.2%
Aug
4,311,089
8.9%
4,264,232
8.8%
46,857
1.1%
Sep
4,079,861
8.4%
4,126,962
8.5%
(47,100)
-1.1%
Oct
4,257,747
8.8%
4,147,662
8.5%
110,085
2.7%
Nov
4,093,428
8.4%
4,120,139
8.5%
(25,711)
-0.6%
Dec
4,255,198
8.8%
4,245,038
8.8%
10,160
0.2%
Jan
4,679,710
9.6%
4,625,008
9.5%
54,702
1.2%
Feb
4,722,849
9.7%
4,631,229
9.5%
91,620
2.0%
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Totals
$ 34,695,301
71.5%
70.6%
1.3%
$ 34,242,374
$ 452,927
City of Owasso
Total Monthly Sales Tax Revenues
Last Five Fiscal Years
2023 -2024
2022 -2023
2021 -2022
2020 -2021
2019 -2020
Jul
$ 3,809,901
$ 3,859,805
$ 3,440,377
$ 3,464,240
$ 3,005,671
Aug
3,892,331
3,888,306
3,558,829
3,386,133
2,958,434
Sep
3,629,534
3,743,687
3,522,962
3,227,732
2,969,838
Oct
3,839,191
3,767,889
3,653,860
3,093,584
3,067,281
Nov
3,686,934
3,750,140
3,443,276
3,162,417
2,855,219
Dec
3,777,373
3,854,603
3,538,043
3,214,507
3,105,262
Jan
4,107,128
4,145,010
3,890,744
3,466,664
3,399,527
Feb
4,109,253
4,055,635
4,033,475
3,406,382
3,294,059
Mar
-
3,334,731
2,990,573
2,987,980
2,677,677
Apr
-
3,659,838
3,491,187
2,803,716
2,845,063
May
-
4,018,971
3,726,630
3,596,560
2,953,020
Jun
-
3,797,070
3,678,903
3,714,051
2,907,154
$ 30,851,645
$ 45,875,fi86
$ 42,968,861
$ 39,523,987
_L36,048,205
City of Owasso
Total Sales Tax Report
Budget to Actual Comparison
February 9, 2024
2023 -2024
2023 -2024
Actual Collections
Budget Projections
Over (Under) Projection
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Jul
$ 3,809,901
8.8%
$ 3,700,059
8,5%
$ 109,842
3.0%
Aug
3,892,331
9.0%
3,871,550
8.9%
20,781
0.5%
Sep
3,629,534
8.4%
3,739,518
8.6%
(109,984)
-2.9%
Oct
3,839,191
8.8%
3,756,713
8.7%
82,478
2.2%
Nov
3,686,934
8.5%
3,729,646
8.6%
(42,711)
-1.1%
Dec
3,777,373
8.7%
3,827,948
8.8%
(50,574)
-1.3%
Jan
4,107,128
9.5%
4,124,581
9.5%
(17,453)
-0.4%
Feb
4,109,253
9.5%
4,055,931
9.3%
53,322
1.3%
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Totals
$ 30,851,645
71.1%
71.0%
0.1%
$ 3D,805,946
$ 45,699
City of Owasso
Total Sales Tax Report
Two Year Comparison
February 9, 2024
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
2023 -2024
2022 -2023
Increase or (Decrease)
Percent
Percent
Amount
of Budget
Amount
of Actual
Amount
Percent
$ 3,809,901
8.8%
$ 3,859,805
8.4%
$ (49,905)
-1.3%
3,892,331
9.0%
3,888,306
8.5%
4,026
0.1%
3,629,534
8.4%
3,743,687
8.2%
(114,153)
-3.0%
3,839,191
8.8%
3,767,889
8.2%
71,302
1.9%
3,686,934
8.5%
3,750,140
8.2%
(63,206)
-1.7%
3,777,373
8.7%
3,854,603
8.4%
(77,230)
-2.0%
4,107,128
9.5%
4,145,010
9.0%
(37,882)
-0.9%
4,109,253
9.5%
4,055,635
8.8%
53,617
1.3 %.
Totals $30,851,645 71.1% $31,065,076 67.7% $ (213,431) -0.7%
Fiscal Year 2024 Sales Tax Budget is $43.403 million; Fiscal Year 2023 Sales Tax Budget was $43.913 million.
City of Owasso
Monthly Use Tax Revenues
Last Five Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year 2024 Use Tax Budget is $5.061 million
2023 -2024
2022 -2023
2021 -2022
2020 -2021
2019 -2020
Jul
$ 485,519
$ 401,124
$ 326,380
$ 320,463
$ 224,427
Aug
418,758
363,566
404,700
308,877
213,728
Sep
450,327
425,319
318,417
319,035
258,541
Oct
418,556
357,484
392,609
322,295
211,009
Nov
406,494
406,252
339,020
325,866
212,040
Dec
477,825
422,765
368,226
353,105
226,537
Jan
572,582
478,272
487,449
406,969
280,550
Feb
613,597
574,438
509,782
493,847
404,153
Mar
-
378,203
330,651
291,099
187,862
Apr
-
440,597
310,281
286,867
233,275
May
-
505,331
390,745
439,483
257,842
Jun
-
415,151
348,589
316,929
321,127
$ 3,843,656
$ 5,168,503
$ 4,526,849
$ 4,184,835
$ 3,031,109
Fiscal Year 2024 Use Tax Budget is $5.061 million
City of Owasso
Total Use Tax Report
Two Year Comparison
February 9, 2024
2023 -2024
2022 -2023
_ Increase or (Decrease)
Percent
Percent
Amount
of Budget
Amount
of Actual
Amount
Percent
Jul
$ 485,519
9.6%
$ 401,124
7.8%
$ 84,395
21.0%
Aug
418,758
8.3%
363,566
7.0%
55,192
15.2%
Sep
450,327
8.9%
425,319
8.2%
25,008
5.9%
Oct
418,556
8.3%
357,484
6.9%
61,072
17.1%
Nov
406,494
8.0%
406,252
7.9%
241
0.1%
Dec
477,825
9.4%
422,765
8.2%
55,060
13.0%
Jan
572,582
11.3%
478,272
9.3%
94,309
19.7%
Feb
613,597
12.1%
574,438
11.1%
39,159
6.8%
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Totals
$ 3,843,656
76.0%
66.9%
12.1%
$ 3,429,221
$ 414,435