Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996.07.25_OPWA Agenda_SpecialPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY TYPE OF MEETING: Special DATE: July 25, 1996 TIME: 6:30 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Conference Room, City Hall Notice and Agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 23, 1996. Phnothy �no D. RoWey, Community Dek#opment Director AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to the Award of a Contract for the Privatization of All Residential Refuse Collection. Mr. Carr Attachment #3 The staff has completed a bidding process, reviewed the bids received, and will recommend P rejection of all bids received relating to the privatization of residential refuse collection services. 4. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to the Award of a Contract for the Purchase of a Refuse Collection Vehicle by the Public Works Department; and Authorization for Payment. Mr Carr Attachment #4 The staff has completed a bidding process, reviewed the bids received, and will recommend a contract be awarded to Waste Research, Inc. for the purchase of one refuse collection " vehicle in the amount of $105,416.53. Owasso Public Works Authority July 25, 1996 Page 2 5. Report from OPWA Manager 6. Report from OPWA Attorney Adjournment TO: RODNEY J. RAY CITY MANAGER FROM: F. ROBERT CARR, JR., P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ISUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION BIDS IDATE: July 19, 1996 IBACKGROUND: Bids were received on May 2, 1996 for a new refuse collection vehicle. A total of 8 bids were submitted by 6 manufacturers, ranging from $105,416.53 to $127,035.00 (the FY95 -96 budget for this purchase is $110,000.00). In light of the dollar amount of the vehicle, staff was authorized by the Trustees on June 18, 1996, perform an evaluation of providing residential refuse collection services prior to investing in a new collection vehicle. Staff was authorized to solicit bids for contracting residential refuse collection and disposal services to a private vendor. All bidders for the new refuse collection vehicle agreed to extend their bids to at least July 31, 1996. This extension allowed time for responses to be received and evaluated for contracting residential collection and disposal services. Staff did not believe spending over $105,000 on a truck would be a good business decision without evaluating all options. To adequately conduct such an analysis, it was necessary to include the potential for contracting residential collection and disposal services. A comparison could then be made with actual and budgeted costs of services using city personnel. It was felt that if the evaluation of contractor bids indicates a true savings for the city, and the Trustees agrees that contracting is desirable, then the truck bids could be rejected in favor of privatization. On the otherhand, if the bids for privatization were not advantageous, they could 10 be rejected and a contract for a new vehicle could be awarded. Page 2 Residential Refuse Collection Bids B11D SPECIFICATIONS: A set of bid specifications and contract documents prepared by staff and reviewed by the City Attorney (see Attachment 1). Generally, the specifications included the contractor services to be essentially the same as presently being provided. Requirements included: ® Once per week curbside pickup • Use of polycarts (with additional bag allowance) • Separate yardwaste collection • Extra collection for bulky materials and • Bid prices to purchase existing equipment that may not be needed for city operations. A bid proposal packet was assembled and advertised. Bids from prospective firms were accepted on July 18, 1996. BIDS ANALYSIS: Bids were received from the following four (4) companies: • Browning -Ferris Industries, Inc. (Tulsa, OK) • Controlled Waste (Tulsa, OK) • Johnson Sanitation Service, Inc. (Glenpool, OK) and • Waste Management of Oklahoma, Inc. (Tulsa, OK) Staff used the current residential refuse and yardwaste collection frequency as the basis of comparison of the submitted bids. Bid items are compared in Table 1. Base Bid The Base Bid is a compilation of monthly charges for residential refuse cart, commercial refuse cart, and residential yardwaste cart and bag collection and disposal. Annualized total cost of each item is listed based on the monthly rate and number of units provided service. The quantities of each item included in the Base Bid (with the exception of the "extra refuse/yardwaste pickup" item, which is variable and easily quantifiable) have been estimated using end of May 1996 billing account data. These data serve as the basis of the comparison of costs for each bidder. Based on the tabulation, the apparent lowest annualized Base Bid was provided by Browning- Ferris Industries, Inc. (BFI) in the amount of $361,566.60. TABLE 1 MONTHLY AND ANNUALIZED CONTRACT COST PER BID ITEM BFI Controlled Waste Johnson Waste Management Item Units Per Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual month Total Total Total Total BASE BID REFUSE COLLECTION Residential Curbside 3,978 $6.85 $326,991.60 No Bid No Bid $8.00 $381,888.00 $6.80 $324,604.80 Houseside 10 $7.50 $900.00 No Bid No Bid $4.00 $480.00 $8.80 $1,056.00 Commercial 124 $10.00 $14,880.00 No Bid No Bid $10.00 $14,880.00 $10.00 $14,880. YARDWASTE COLLECTION (April through October) Cart locations 290 $6.50 $13,195.00 No Bid No Bid $2.00 $4,060.00 $5.90 $11,977.00 Bagged locations 400 $3.50/10 $5 600.00 No Bid No Bid $2.00 $5,600.00 $3.90 $10,920.00 BASE BID TOTALS $361,566.60 No Bid $406 908.00 $363,4 EXTRA REFUSE/YARDWASTE PICKUP Suggested a 30gal -bag No Bid . >:> ::; ;:: >:: >::> $10.00 /stop Residential/commercial r and or equivalent $0.05/lb <'.......;,:.; $5.00/ d3 cost structure Yardwaste per pound No Bid $0.05/lb $5.00 /ydj ALTERNATE BID o ........... ::::: >:::: PURCHASE VEHICLES 1984 International $3,500.00 $4,500.00 $15,000.00 $3,000.00 1984 International $3,500.00 ..... . ;;:;`'.` $4,500.00 . ......... $15 000.00 $3,000.00 1981 Lodal _.......> ...:;....: $1 500.00 $3 000.00 s:.;»::: : >:::. >::;:. >::: >:::;:.; >:. >::: $15 000.00 .....;;;;:.;:.;:. >::: $2,000.00 9 1 88 Lodal $4.5 00.00 $ 6 000.00 ;:.;:.:.;:.;:.;:.;::::.;:.;;• 25 000.00 $5 000.00 1992 Lodal $68 400.00 .: $9,500.00 S40,000.00 $30,000.00 CARTS 90 -gallon Ameri -Kart Per cart Per cart Per cart Per cart Green 4 200 $15.00 $63,000.00 $15.00 $63,000.00 $25.00 $105,000.00 $10.00 $42,000.00 Red 290 $15.00 $4,350.00 $12.00 $3,480.00 $25.00 $7,250.00 $10.00 $27900.00 90 -gallon Zarn "Roll-A-Waste I No Bid No Bid $12.00 $900.00 $25.00 S1.875.00 $10.00 $750.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE BID $148,750.00 $94,880.00 $224,125 00 $88,650.00 Page 4 Residential Refuse Collection Bids Alternate Bid for purchase of Authority vehicles and equipment The Alternate Bid was structured to have bidders provide prices for the purchase of existing vehicles and equipment. Approximately 60 -days following award of a contract, the contractor would be responsible for providing necessary vehicles and carts. The City would not need to maintain the existing vehicles and equipment inventory; therefore, bids were provided to enable the Authority to sell the non - essential items. With the exception of Controlled Waste, all bidders indicated that they would buy the Authority equipment only if awarded the contract. BFI bid a total of $148,750.00 for vehicles and carts. Controlled Waste did not bid on collection services and bid only on- the vehicles and equipment in the amount of $94,880.00. ACTUAL AND BUDGETED CITY COSTS OF SERVICE: Calculation of present actual and budgeted costs of providing the specified services using city personnel and equipment serves as a basis for comparison of the bid amounts. The following costs have been identified by the Finance Department: Expenses FY 1996 Budgeted FY 1997 Personal Services $92,875 $93,239 Landfill tipping fees 47,310 55,000 Polycarts 23,825 24,000 Polycart repair supplies 1,504 1,000 Vehicle maintenance and fuel 22,674 21,000 Uniforms 1,377 2,500 Vehicle depreciation 30,517' Administrative services 25,000 25,000" Other 1,041 1,050 TOTALS $215,606 $253,306 *Two $110,000 vehicles with 7 -year straight -line depreciation "Estimated for all additional support services COSTS COMPARISON: Budgeted FY 1996 -97 expenses for residential/commercial refuse and yardwaste collection and disposal amount to approximately $253,000. The apparent low bid amount for similar services is approximately $361,500. A differential of $108,500 exists between these two amounts. As increased development a Page 5 Residential Refuse Collection Bids and growth in the city occurs, more customers will be added to the present service base and the above differential will increase. Present refuse collection rates charged to customers are as follows: Residential $8.00 per month Commercial $10.00 per month Yardwaste container $6.50 per month IIncluded in the residential rate is $1.50 per month applied to the residential street repair program. To cover the cost of the bid amounts of the apparent low bidder and the $1.50 per month residential street repair charge, a minimum of $8.35 per month would be required. Rates would need to be increased and there would not be any additional net income to the OPWA fund. SUN I MiARY ANALYSIS: Various points have been determined during the bid analysis: It is more cost- effective to continue providing service using city personnel and equipment. Turning over the operation to a contractor would not be cost - effective/productive at this time. Efficiencies of operation are able to be maintained using the present mode of operation. • The Trustees would have to raise rates for refuse collection to achieve the same net level of income and maintain the existing program for residential street repairs. • The ability to provide quality service to the customers will be enhanced with the addition of a new refuse collection vehicle in FY1996 -97. An additional vehicle should be added to the fleet in FY1997 -98 to meet projected system growth and consistent collection services. • Manpower for refuse collection has not been increased at a rate consistent with the rate of system growth. An additional person should be included in the Division to keep from having to place demands on other Public Works Department functions. Typically, personnel and equipment are borrowed as- needed to meet daily workload fluctuations, thereby detracting from the ability to provide other essential operations to city customers. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the following actions by the Trustees: 1. Reject all Base Bids for residential/commercial refuse collection services bid on July 18, 1996. Page 6 Residential Refuse Collection Bids 2. Award a bid for the purchase of a refuse collection vehicle (see next Agenda item). 3. Begin the process to authorize an additional person be added to FY1996 -97 budget for the Refuse Collection Division of the Public Works Department. ATTACBMENTS: 1. Bid documents 2. Bid Proposals Note: Although staff is not requesting any action at this time, the Trustees should consider including the purchase of an additional refuse collection vehicle in the FY1997 -98 Budget. Such a ' purchase will supply the Division with the number of vehicles needed to provide reliable customer service with required flexibility to meet system growth. Based on projections, collection days and the number of vehicles required to be operational ' is expected to increase. A minimum of three (3) vehicles will be needed two or three days per week. MEMORANDUM TO: RODNEY J. RAY CITY MANAGER FROM: F. ROBERT CARR, JR., P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE 1 22 DATE: July , 1996 BACKGROUND: The FY 94 -95 Public Works Department Refuse Collection Division Budget contained funds for the purchase of a new refuse collection vehicle. Due to budget constraints, purchase of the vehicle was deferred to the FY95 -96 budget. The existing refuse collection vehicles used for residential collection are a 1981 Loadal, 1988 Loadal and 1992 Loadal. Presently, Public Works uses two full -time collection routes (4 days per week) and one part-time route (1 day per week). In addition, one of the full -time trucks is used in commercial collection one day per week. Continued growth in residential development is expected to increase the part-time route to a minimum of 2 days per week by the Fall 1996. It is anticipated that the division may require three full-time residential collection routes by FY 97 -98. To ensure an adequate amount of backup equipment is available in case of vehicle breakdown or extended down time for repairs, the additional refuse collection vehicle was included in the budget. Replaced vehicles are utilized for emergency backup and at the Recycle Center. VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS: Specifications for bidding were prepared containing an alternate for a dual rear axle vehicle. 1p The dual axle vehicle was specified help to distribute the weight of the truck more effectively and reduce impacts on our residential streets. The dual axle vehicle also has a larger carrying capacity, which could reduce landfill hauling costs. Page 2 Refuse Collection Vehicle Bid Award In August 1995, Public Works Department staff completed a specification packet and bid documents were mailed to six (6) prospective bidders. Only one (1) bid was received on October 26, 1995 in the amount of $117,130.00 (the FY95 -96 vehicle budget was $110,000). Subsequent to the bid date, two vendors expressed that the bid specifications restricted their ability to submit on the vehicle. Discussion was held by Public Works and Vehicle Maintenance personnel with both potential vendors to determine how to restructure the specifications to ensure continued quality and enable additional bids to be submitted. As a result of these discussions, staff concluded that performance -based proposals detailing specific vehicle components and operational requirements would be in the best interests of the city. As a result, a revised specification packet was prepared. BID ANALYSIS: On May 2, 1996, eight (8) bids were received from six (6) prospective vendors. Bids ranged in price from a low of $105,416.00 to a high bid of $127,035.00. Bid proposals submitted vary based on individual characteristics of each vehicle. None of the eight bids completely met the specification. Priorities of the specifications have been established and each vehicle evaluated to ensure that they met the priorities. The priorities are listed below: • 25 Cubic Yard Capacity This capacity enables fewer trips to the landfill (approximately 12 miles round trip). Existing Lodal capacity is 20 cubic yards. The added capacity conserves fuel and is a 20% increase over current trucks in use. Hopper Capacity - 3 Cubic Yards The hopper is the area and opening that receives the refuse from the cart. This opening must be of a sufficient size as to prevent the spillage of refuse to the ground and street. Refuse Discharge Method (Ejection) The ejection method of emptying the truck pushes refuse out the rear of the truck rather than requiring the packer body to be raised in the front and the load to be emptied by gravity. When the packer body is raised the center of gravity for the vehicle changes and the potential for the truck to sideways as the vehicle is driven forward to remove the load is possible. Ejection minimizes the possibility of overturning. • Low entry cab (20 -inch maximum) The present collection system utilizes a one-man operation. The procedure requires the driver /operator to exit and enter the cab at each stop. Low entry is needed to keep driver fatigue to a minimum. Page 3 Refuse Collection Vehicle Bid Award • Refuse Container (polycart) Lift and Dump Capability Owasso presently utilizes Ameri-Kart 2000 (polycarts) for residential refuse collection. These carts have a capacity of 90 gallons. To maintain a one -man per truck operation, the lift is required to enable the dumping of these carts. Exposure to Workers Compensation back injury claims are reduced using the lift system. a 300 Horsepower Engine The engine was specified at this high horsepower rating to enable the engine to operate all hydraulic, air and power systems efficiently. This higher horsepower allows the vehicle to effectively operate at residential and highway speeds. • Automatic Transmission (5 Speed) An automatic transmission was specified and has become an industry standard. This transmission greatly reduces driver fatigue. The five speed transmission provides additional fuel saving during refuse transportation to and from the landfill. The need for clutch maintenance is eliminated. An analysis was performed to compare the priority bid specifications to the refuse truck provided by the bidders. The objective was to determine which vehicle would be able to be provided to meet established priorities within the available budget. RESULTS OF PRIORITY EVALUATION: Each priority specification, including budget, is listed in Table 1 and the submitted bids evaluated for conformance. Results of the evaluation are as follows: Within budget amount Although the FY 95 -96 budget for this vehicle was $110,000.00, the budget was increased to $120,000.00 for FY96 -97. Four bids were received (Crane Carrier, Waste Research and Williams Refuse) below the budget. 25 cubic yard capacity One bid submittal (Williams Refuse) did not meet the minimum requirement. All other bids met or exceeded the minimum. 3 cubic yard hopper =acily Total Truck, Waste Research and Williams Refuse are capable of meeting this specification. Ejection discharge method Only two bidders (Waste Research and Williams Refuse) submitted equipment in conformance with this specification. Low entry cab Of the 8 bids submitted, one bidder (Waste Research) exceeded the entry requirement. The submittal exceeded specified requirements by only 1 -inch and not considered to be excessive. TABLE 1 REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE BID SPECIFICATION COMPARISON Bidder Wig Ejection budget Polycart lift amount Automatic Crane Carrier Tulsa, OK Yes discharge $112,518.00 Crane Carrier Tulsa, OK Yes (5 speed) $119,233.00 McNeilus Truck Hutchins, TX No & Manufacturing $122,950.00 Total Truck & Norman, OK No Trailer Equipment $123,021.00 Total Truck & Norman, OK No Trailer Equipment $127,035.00 Waste Research Chouteau, OK Yes (0.75 yd3) $105,416.53 (18 ") Williams Refuse Owasso, OK Yes Equipment Co. $115,483.00 Williams Refuse Owasso, OK No Equipment Co. $128,434.00 25 cubic 3 cubic yard Ejection Low entry cab Polycart lift 300 HP Automatic yard capacity hopper capacity discharge (20" maximum) mechanism engine (5 speed) method transmission Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes (29 yd3) (0.75 yd3) (18 ") (250 HP) Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes (33 yd3) (0.75 yd3) (18 ") (250 HP) Yes yes No Yes Yes Yes No (4 speed) (25 yd3) Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes (34 yd3) (0.75 yd3) (18 ") (250 HP) Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes (33 yd3) (0.75 yd3) (18 ") (250 HP) Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes (25 yd) (21-) (275 HP) No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No (20 yd3) (with extension) (18 ") (215 HP) (4 speed) Yes Yes yes yes Yes No No (25 yd3) (with extension) (18 ") (230 HP) (4 speed) � M M M M M M r ' Page 5 Refuse Collection Vehicle Bid Award Polycart lift mechanism All submittals indicated conformance with this requirement. 300 horsepower engine Only one bid submitted (McNeilus Truck) conformed to the specified engine horsepower. Of the remaining submittals, Waste Research specified a 275 horsepower engine. Automatic (5 spy) transmission Three of the six bidders are capable of meeting this specification. The conforming bidders are Crane Carrier, Total Truck and Waste Research. A summary tabulation of data presented on Table 1 is shown below. Each bid is listed in order of increasing bid price and shows the truck capacity and conformance with the specifications. Bidder Bid Amount Truck Capacity (cubic yards) Conformance with specifications Yes No Waste Research $105,416.53 25' 6 2 Crane Carrier $112,518.00 29 5 3 Williams Refuse Equipment $115,483.00 20 5 3 Crane Carver $119,233.00 33 5 3 McNeilus Truck $122,950.00 25 5 3 Total Truck $123,021.00 34 4 4 Total Truck $127,035.00 33 4 4 IL Williams Refuse Equipment $128,434.00 25 5 3 Detailed review of the top four (4) submittals indicates that only Waste Research and Williams Refuse were the only bidders proposing use of an ejection discharge method. The Waste Research submittal conforms to 6 of the 8 evaluation criteria. Deviation from the other criteria is considered minimal (a 21" cab entry versus 20" specified and 275 horsepower engine versus 300 horsepower specified). A 25 cubic yard capacity is proposed. The Waste Research bid amount of $105,416.83 is below the budget of $120,000.00. (Williams Refuse proposed a 20 cubic yard capacity in the amount of $115,483.00. The vehicle more closely meeting bid specifications has a 25 cubic yard capacity in the amount of $128,434.00.) tFUNDING: Funding for purchase of the refuse collection vehicle is included in the FY96 -97 Refuse Collection Division budget (line item 61 -541 -5443) in the amount of $120,000. Page 6 Refuse Collection Vehicle Bid Award RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Trustees approval of the purchase of a refuse collection vehicle from Waste Research, Inc., Chouteau, Oklahoma in the amount of $105,416.53 and authorization for payment. ATTAC S: 1. Bid proposals Waste Research, Inc. Williams Refuse Equipment Co., Inc.