HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996.09.03_City Council Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: September 3, 1996
TIME: 7:00 p. m.
PLACE: Council Chambers, Owasso Community Center
Notice and Agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin
board at 4:00 p. m. on Friday, August 30 1996.
Marcia outwell, City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Special Presentation to Mr Tom Kimball, Past Chairman of the Owasso Economic
Development Authority.
Councilor Helm and the City Council
4. Request Approval of the Minutes of August 20, 1996 Regular Meeting.
Attachment #4
Owasso City Council
September 3, 1996
Page 2
5. Request Approval of Claims.
Attachment #5
6. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to Ordinance #528, an Ordinance Providing
for the Closing of a Portion of a Drainage Easement Located on Lot 13, Block 1, Windsor ~
Lake II Addition to the City of Owasso, Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
Mr Ray
Attachment #6
The staff will recommend Council approval of Ordinance #528 based on previous Council
action of August 20, 1996 approving such closing.
7. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to Ordinance #529, an Ordinance Approving ~
and Adopting an Action by the Owasso Public Works Authority, Wherein Rates for the
Purchase of Water from the Authority Were Increased.
Mr Ray
Attachment #7 ,~
The staff will recommend Council approval of Ordinance #529 establishing the rates '
charged to City of Owasso water customers and approving action taken by the OPWA to ~
establish those rates.
Owasso City Council
September 3, 1996
Page 3
8. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for Council Approval of
"Carry-Over Budget Requests" from Various Departments, Such Action Requested in the
Form of Supplemental Appropriations to the FY 1996-97 Budget.
Ms Bishop
Attachment #8
The staff will recommend Council approval of supplemental appropriations to the General
Fund in the amount of $50,925, to the Capital Improvements Fund in the amount of
$80,000, to the Garage Fund in the amount of $4735, and to the Capital Projects Grant
~ Fund in the amount of $94, 844.00; such supplemental appropriations derived from a
carryover of funds from the 1995-96 budget.
1 --
' 9. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for an Amendment to the
Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual Providing for Payment of Tuition Costs to
Employees Seeking Advanced Degrees, and Requiring Prior Approval of Course Work by
~ the City Manager.
Mr Ray
Attachment #9
~ The staff will recommend Council approval of the requested amendment to the Personnel
Policies and Procedures Manual.
~ 10. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to an Agreement Between the City of
Owasso and the Oklahoma District Court, Judicial District #14.
Mr Ray
Mr Cates
Attachment #10
The staff will recommend Council approval of an agreement to continue a program wherein
the City assumes jurisdiction of certain specified juvenile offenders.
i~
1
1
Owasso City Council
September 3, 1996
Page 4
11. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request to Authorize the City Attorney
to File, on Behalf of the City of Owasso, a Disclaimer of Interest in Case No CJ-96-132,
a Legal Action Involving the State of Oklahoma vs Osage Railroad Co, Such Action
Involving Real Property Located in Osage County.
Mr Cates
Attachment #11
The staff will recommend that the City Council authorize the City Attorney to file a
Disclaimer of Interest in the case, eliminating the City as a party to the action.
12. Report from City Manager
13. Report from City Attorney
14. Reports from City Councilors
15. Unfinished Business
Owasso City Council
September 3, 1996
Page 5
16. New Business
17. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for an Executive Session of the
City Council, Such Session Required for the Discussion Relating to a Possible Litigation
~ Wherein Disclosure of Certain Facts will Impair the Ability of the Council to Conduct a
Subsequent Proceeding in the Public Interest, and Authorized by 25 O.S., Section 307-B(4),
the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act.
Mr Ray
Attachment #17
The staff will recommend Council action to enter into executive session and that the City
Manager and City Attorney be invited to attend that session.
ii
i~
1
18. Adjournment
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, August 20, 1996
~ The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, August 20, 1996 in the Council
Chambers at the Owasso Community Center per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda
posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 16, 1996.
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
^ Mayor Ewing called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
ITEM 2: INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Rev Linzy Slayden, Pastor of Friendship Baptist Church.
' ITEM 3: FLAG SALUTE
ii
ii
ii
The Flag Salute was led by Vice Mayor Ramey.
ITEM 4: ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Danny Ewing, Mayor
Joe Ramey, Vice Mayor
Mary Lou Barnhouse, Councilor
Michael Helm, Councilor
Tracy Standridge, Councilor
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
Ronald D Cates, City Attorney
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
ITEM 5: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 6, 1996 REGULAR
MEETING AND AUGUST 15. 1996 SPECIAL MEETING
Mr Ramey moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to approve the minutes as submitted, by
reference made a part hereto.
AYE: Ramey, Barnhouse, Standridge, Helm, Ewing
~ NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
Owasso City Council
ITEM 6: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE CLAIMS.
Mr Helm moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, that the following claims be approved as
submitted: (1) General Fund $16,104.25; (2) Workers Comp Self-Ins $1,630.64; (3) Ambulance
Service Fund $2,903.74; (4) City Garage $2,958.59; (5) Capital Projects Grant $17.50;
(6) Payroll $114, 828.79; (7) City Garage Payroll $2,037.36.
AYE: Helm, Barnhouse, Standridge, Ramey, Ewing
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 7: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR THE LEASE/PURCHASE OF A COPY MACHINE FOR THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT.
Chief Alexander said that the Owasso Police Department purchased a new copy machine in July
1991 utilizing athree-year lease purchase agreement. The copy use of that machine averages
10,000 copies per month. There have been many breakdowns over the last few months and the
quality of the copies has deteriorated. Funds were place in the FY 96-97 budget to replace the
copy machine. Several different copy machines have been placed at the Police Department for
trial use for the past several months. Specifications were developed and mailed to five vendors
and bids were opened on July 31st. The lowest bid received was from Western Business
Products on a three-year lease purchase agreement. At the end of the three-year period, the
copy machine will be owned outright without the necessity of a buy-out clause. Mayor Ewing
moved, seconded by Mr Ramey, to approve a lease purchase agreement with Western Business
Products for the acquisition of a Toshiba 4550 copy machine at a total monthly cost of $202 and
a monthly maintenance agreement cost of $130; and authorization for payment.
AYE: Ewing, Ramey, Standridge, Barnhouse, Helm
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 8: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO THE
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STREETS, WATER,
SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED TO
SERVE BARRINGTON POINT PHASE III SUBDIVISION.
Barrington Point III contains approximately 480 feet of water line, 1200 feet of sanitary sewer
line, 920 feet of storm drains, and 1300 feet of streets. A final inspection of the utilities was
conducted on June 25, 1996 and a punch list developed. All items on the punch list have now
been completed and all permits have been obtained. The required maintenance bonds have also
August 20, 1996 ~
2
Owasso City Council
been provided by the developer and will t
Mr Standridge moved, seconded by Mr Ramey,
sewer, storm sewer, and street systems.
August 20, 1996
effective upon acceptance of the utilities.
to accept the Barrington Point II water, sanitary
AYE: Standridge, Ramey, Barnhouse, Helm, Ewing
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 9: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER A
CONTRACT FOR THE ERECTION OF EQUIPMENT STORAGE
BUILDINGS. BETWEEN THE CITY OF OWASSO AND LANDCO
CONSTRUCTION CO. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR FINAL PAYMENT
AND RELEASE OF RETAINAGE TO THE CONTRACTOR
On April 16, 1996 a contract was awarded to Landco Construction Co Inc for the construction
of two separate equipment storage buildings and roof repairs on the existing street maintenance
building. The contract was in the amount of $80,255.34. One storage building is located at the
Sports Park for use by the Parks Department and the other is adjacent to the existing street
maintenance building. All construction and repairs have been completed and final inspections
conducted. A punch list was provided to the contractor, and all punch list items have been
completed. The contractor chose to wait until completion of the project to submit a pay request,
therefore the final pay request is for the entire amount of the contract. Mayor Ewing moved,
seconded by Mr Ramey, to accept the work performed under a contract for erection of
equipment storage buildings and repair of an existing building, release retainage, and authorize
final payment to Landco Construction Co Inc in the amount of $80,255.34.
AYE: Ewing, Ramey, Barnhouse, Standridge, Helm
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 10: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST TO CLOSE A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT
LOCATED ON LOT 13. BLOCK 1, WINDSOR LAKE ADDITION
The City of Owasso received a request to close a portion of a drainage easement located on Lot
13, Block 1, Windsor Lake II Addition to allow for a larger building pad area for a proposed
single-family dwelling. The drainage easement was originally over-sized and a portion of the
easement is no longer needed. The request was reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee,
and none of the utility providers had any concerns. The Owasso Planning Commission reviewed
the request at their August 13, 1996 meeting and recommended approval. Mr Ramey moved,
Owasso City Council August 20, 1996
seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to approve closing a portion of the drainage easement located on
Lot 13, Block 1, Windsor Lake II Addition.
AYE: Ramey, Barnhouse, Helm, Standridge, Ewing
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 11: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1996-97 BUDGET, SUCH
AMENDMENT IN THE FORM OF A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION
TO THE GENERAL FUND AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
BUDGETS .
The FY 1995-96 budget included appropriations for parking lot improvements within both the
Pazk Maintenance budget and Capital Improvements Fund, with the parking lots at Elm Creek
Park and City Hall/Community Center identified for improvements. The projects were not
completed in FY 95-96, however bids were solicited after the beginning of FY 96-97. In order
to awazd contracts for these projects, it is necessary for the City Council to approve specific
carry-over budget requests as supplemental appropriations to the FY 96-97 budget. Mayor
Ewing moved, seconded by Mr Ramey, to approve supplemental appropriations in the amount
of $16, 805 to the Pazk Maintenance Budget, $12,982 to the General Government Budget, and
$12,000 to the Capital Improvements Fund, such appropriations derived from a carryover of
funds from the 1995-96 budget and intended for use of pazking lots improvements.
AYE: Ewing, Ramey, Barnhouse, Standridge, Helm
NAY: None
Motion carved 5-0.
ITEM 12: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS AT ELM
CREEK PARK AND CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER.
Specifications were developed and bid packets prepazed for improvements to the parking lots at
Elm Creek Pazk and City Hall/Community Center. Bids were advertized, with six area
contractors responding to the request for bids. It was determined that each parking lot
improvement would be awazded separately as a cost savings measure. The lowest bidder for the
City Hall/Community Center pazking lot was APAC-Oklahoma, who also submitted the lowest
bid for the striping. The lowest bid for Elm Creek Park west pazking was submitted by
Newman Contracting, and the lowest bid for Elm Creek Park south parking was submitted by
Horizon Construction. However, Mr Wolfe of Horizon Construction stated that he could not
honor the bid unless he was awarded both parking lots. He said he was not aware that each lot
4
Owasso City Council
August 20, 1996
would be awarded separately, even though specific language to that effect was contained in the
bid packet. Newman Contracting submitted the second low bid for the Elm Creek Park south
parking lot, and the staff recommended that both Elm Creek parking lots be awarded to
Newman. Mr Standridge moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to award a contract to APAC-
Oklahoma of Tulsa in the amount of $24,982 for improvements to the City Hall/Community
Center parking lot per specifications; and to award a contract to Newman Contracting of Tulsa
in the amount of $16,805 for improvement to Elm Creek parking lots per specifications; and
authorization for payment.
AYE: Standridge, Barnhouse, Helm, Ramey, Ewing
NAY: None
^ Motion carried 5-0.
~ ITEM 13: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR A LOT-TIE AGREEMENT ON LOTS 14 & 15 THE
FAIRWAYS AT BAILEY RANCH.
^ The City of Owasso has received a lot tieing request for two lots located within The Fairways
Addition (Lots 14 and 15 in Block 3). The request was made to allow for the construction of
one single-family residence on the two lots. There are no utility easements along the common
lot lines. The Owasso Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot tieing agreement
at their August 13, 1996 meeting. Ms Barnhouse moved, seconded by Mr Helm, to approve
'r' the lot tieing agreement for Lots 14 and 15 of Block 3, The Fairways Addition to the City of
Owasso.
AYE: Barnhouse, Helm, Standridge, Ramey, Ewing
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 14: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OWASSO AND LODGE #149 OF
THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE
Contract negotiations with the FOP have been ongoing throughout the spring and summer
months. Earlier in the summer, the Union declared impasse and the Union .and City agreed to
mediation and a mediation session was scheduled. However, tentative agreements were reached
~ prior to the mediation session, and the Union subsequently voted to approve the contract as
agreed upon. Council discussed the terms of the contract in a work session on August 15th,
' posted as a special meeting. Mayor Ewing moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to approve a
contract between the City of Owasso and FOP Lodge #149 for FY 1996-97, and that the Mayor
be authorized to execute the document.
5
Owasso City Council August 20, 1996
AYE: Ewing, Barnhouse, Ramey, Standridge
NAY: Helm
Motion carried 4-1.
Councilor Helm requested that the following statement be entered into the minutes of this City
Council meeting:
I would initially ask the indulgence on the part of you, Mayor Ewing, as well as my
fellow Council Members, in affording the personal privilege of making this statement and having
such entered into the minutes of the City Council meeting of the 20th day of August 1996:
The topic which I desire to briefly discuss is that involving the emergency service
personnel of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma. As everyone is aware, in the past few months
there has been a considerable amount of negotiation between the administrative staff of the City
of Owasso, Oklahoma, and representatives of the International Association of Firefighters and
the Fraternal Order of Police. Additionally, in the last few months there has been considerable
discussion regarding such negotiations between the administrative staff of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma and the City Council. As a result of such, to date collective bargaining agreements
have been entered into between the City of Owasso, Oklahoma and the International Association
of Firefighters and the Fraternal Order of Police.
The purpose for my statement is not directed towards the collective bargaining process
or agreements for fiscal year 96-97, but on the contrary, for what I perceive as being of
importance for fiscal year 97-98. I fully recognize, understand and adhere to the obligation on
the part of the City to annually negotiate in good faith with representatives of the firefighters and
police officers, the objective of which being entering into a collective bargaining agreement
mutually acceptable to both. Therefore, the purpose of my statement is not designed to
impermissively predetermine what will be the City's inalterable parameters for future
negotiations. On the contrary, my purpose is to publicly state one item that I have felt, and
continue to feel, is of critical importance to the fiscal integrity of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma. I am sure that it comes as no surprise that I have had, and continue to have, great
difficulty with the language in both contracts whereby certain days off are considered as hours
worked for purposes of overtime compensation calculation. I have been advised by the City
Attorney that legally, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, such treatment is not required by
federal law. Furthermore, I am advised by the administrative staff of this city that such
treatment is not only inconsistent with prevailing practices in both private as well as public
sector contracts, but more importantly, is monetarily extremely costly to the citizens of the City
of Owasso, Oklahoma. Recognition of these factors leaves me no alternative but to publicly
state that it is my desire as a member of the City Council of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma,
whether it be next fiscal year or a succeeding fiscal year, that the administrative staff, in good
faith bargaining, diligently endeavor to eliminate from the collective bargaining agreements what
I feel is this legally and fiscally unwarranted provision.
6
Owasso City Council August 20, 1996
Additionally, I wish at this time to apprize members of the City Council of the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma, as well as the citizenry thereof, that in conversations with the City Manager
I have let it be known that I am of the opinion that the time is now for the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma to implement random drug testing in the emergency services departments of the City
as is currently in place in a vast number of municipalities across these United States. I fully
recognize that the adoption and implementation of a random drug testing policy for the fire and
police departments as a result of the Fire and Police Arbitration Act, requires adherence to
certain processes. With such in mind, I have requested of the City Manager, with the assistance
of the Personnel Officer and the City Attorney, to proceed with such processes to seek
implementation of random drug testing of the firefighters and police officers within the next 90
to 120 days. I propose this not with any personal animosity towards any member of our
excellent ambulance, fire and police services. On the contrary, I propose it from the standpoint
of an obligation to the citizens of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, to assure at all times provision
of well trained and well disciplined firefighters and police officers possessing the highest of
ethical and legal standards.
Thank you.
ITEM 15: REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER
No report.
ITEM 16: REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY
No report.
ITEM 17: REPORT FROM CITY COUNCILORS
Councilor Helm requested that the following statement be entered into the minutes of this City
Council meeting:
Mayor Ewing and Fellow Council Members:
I again ask your indulgence in affording me a personal privilege to make this statement
and enter such into the minutes of the City Council meeting of the 20th day of August 1996,
which I, after much consideration and reflection, feel personally compelled to make.
' Now that we have concluded with the transactions associated with the acquisition of the
Bailey Golf Ranch by the City of Owasso and the funding of such acquisition by the issuance
of Revenue Bonds by the Owasso Public Works Authority, I feel it necessary, for the benefit
' of the citizens of Owasso today, as well as the citizens of Owasso tomorrow, to briefly reflect
upon what I personally perceived as the guiding principle which necessitated the action taken by
7
Owasso City Council August 20, 1996
this body in terms of the acquisition of the Bailey Golf Ranch, as well as issuance of the Owasso
Public Works Authority Revenue Bonds.
Initially, I, like many others in this community, felt compelled to exhaustively examine
the operation of the Bailey Golf Ranch to make a determination of where fault for the problems
associated with the Bailey Golf Ranch laid. Also, I, as well as many others in this community,
felt a need to not only determine where such fault laid, but also to affix the blame to the
individual or individuals responsible for the problems associated with the Bailey Golf Ranch
operation. Not unlike other members of this community, I then, as well as now, harbored a
great deal of hesitancy in supporting what has been perceived and characterized as an
"unwarranted bail-out" of a mismanaged enterprise. However, Mr Mayor, fellow Council
Members and fellow citizens, regardless of my own personal feelings as such relates to what I
believe constituted managerial irresponsibility, Inevertheless soon realized that my focus of
necessity must be broadened beyond the scope of attributing blame to a more important scope,
and that was what was in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
After much analysis, consideration and reflection, I soon came to realize that my own personal
opinion as relates to the cause of the operational difficulties of the Bailey Golf Ranch must be
put aside for the sake of the betterment of this community. Only after considerable thought and
soul searching did I realize that attributing blame for the operational difficulties associated with
the Bailey Golf Ranch served nothing more than to jeopardize the betterment of this community.
With such in mind and after lengthy deliberation, I, as well as my colleagues I feel safe to say,
determined that the betterment of the community warranted taking whatever lawful and
reasonable steps could be taken to assure the preservation of a valuable asset to this community
which I feel ultimately Bailey Golf Ranch will prove to be. Of equal, if not greater importance,
however, is my commitment to the proposition that the actions taken by this body in its capacity
as City Council, and well as Trustees of the Owasso Public Works Authority and Trustees of
the Owasso Public Golf Authority were necessitated by what I am convinced was the
unquestionable need to preserve the economic and moral integrity of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma.
In conclusion, Mr Mayor and fellow Council Members, I thank you for your indulgence
in affording me this personal privilege so that there can be no question in any person's mind as
to what I, as well as my fellow colleagues I am sure, labored with and were motivated by in the
making of the decisions which brought about the actions associated with this transaction.
Thank you.
In another City Councilor report, Mayor Ewing extended congratulations to Chief Mechanic Jeff
Moody upon his recent completion of certification in several areas of Automotive Service
Excellence.
8
t
ii
Owasso City Council August 20, 1996
ITEM 18: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 19: NEW BUSINESS
A citizen requested an explanation regarding a materialman's lien filed against the city. Mr
Cates explained that a contractor doing some work for the city has not paid his sub-contractors,
therefore one of them filed the lien. Since a materialman's lien cannot be filed against public
land or improvements, Mr Cates will request that the lien be released.
Councilor Standridge asked if there could be some traffic control on 86th street when the high
school traffic is heavy. This situation was referred to Mr Carr.
ITEM 20: ADJOURNMENT
Mr Ramey moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to adjourn.
AYE: Ramey, Barnhouse, Helm, Standridge, Ewing
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0, and the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p. m.
Danny Ewing, Mayor
I~
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
9
f'rT', nr nT~ta.~,~=r~
f;RiTFF..d:T. Ft?iTn
g/'~0/9f, fi'17'1f, A/P ('T.ATM~ RT;PtlT?T A.PAPVR ^A^.
P(l # VT=idllftR T1T?~f'RTPTTf7it AMt1TTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
97(14?5 RF.TTY ,T Mf'rTTTRF.
Tlt?PARTMF.NT Tf1TAT. ____'~
MANAf;F.RTAT.
------------------------------
970;~Of, ('TTY AARAf;F.
9704fi4 TRT?A.r,TTRFR PETTY ('Ar,H
9704fi4 TRRAStiRRR PT=.TTY f'AfiH
970484 TRRA.r,1TRF.R PETTY f'ARH
970`OF, Mt'T TF.T.F.('f1MM[li7T('ATT(li7R
97050fi fif fT)THWT;STF.R.N RT?i.T. TF.T.F.
T7T?PA.RTMF.NT Tf1TAT. ____~•
T,TxANr.T=
------------------------------
RtTY RA('.H ("F.MRTRRY T.?"1TR f,00 _ flit
h00_nn
RF.PA7Rti R/9f~
RF.TMR PT=TTY f'ARH
r,Tf;N RT=.PT.Af"1;MF.NT
('TT5' MC;R EXPENSE
fi/9f~ tJRF
fi/9.4 PT.T?XAR
11 .fig
7.49
1?0.00
111.01
5fi_f~5
~4_fi,~
J J?_ 9 t 1
970481 T.ANTIMARH RpSTNF.S1', SYfiTT=MS l'AT,C'TTT.ATf1R
TIT=PARTMF.NT T(1TA1. ====5
C'(1MMt1NTTY T1F.VRT.(1PMFNT
------------------------------
'
c 97(1'~Oh ('TTY f;ARARF.
97(1449 TNt"tl~
9704fi4 TRF.ART/RT=.R PT;TTY t'AfiH
97(1484 TRT?ASTIRER PETTY t'AfiH
97050E Mf'T TRt.F.t'(IMMtTNT("ATTf1NR
97050l~ Rf1T1THWF.STFRN RF.T,T. TF.T.T;
97(1`10 AT1rT WTRF.T.RRS SFRVTf`.T=.S
T)T'.PARTMRNT Tf ITAT. _ _ _ _>
R MiINTC'TPAT. C'f1TiRT
------------------------------
97011? MTC:HAF.T. Ti_ HTT.RARF.f'.T{
9701 1 R f':HART.T=.R RAMRRY
97050(, Mf'T TF.T.F.t'.TIMMTTNTf'.ATTC-NR
RFPATRR fil95
1 RT ATR MF.MRF.RRHTP TItiT'.R
RF.TMR PETTY t'ARH
RF,TMR PETTY ('ASH
R/9F, [ISF.
fi/9f, PT.RXAR
PHCiNT=. tTRF.-R(1f1NF.Y
179.00
179.00
/,R5 _?4
?x1(11 _7~
7_fi9
R_?5
1.79
4fi_79
??_9fi
?xfi?1.79
RFTATNFR
RF.TATNRR
R /9/, ilfiT?
fi?5.00
fi?5.00
.09
f'TTY CTF f1T'TArr'(1
(;FidFRA.T. FT)idT7
filR(ll9h T3~17'1~ A/F C'T.ATMR RF.Pf1RT APAPVR PAC;F.'
PCT # VF.NT}i1R T1F~t:RTPTTCIN AtdCTTTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
97n`nR fif1TTTHWF.RTF.RN RFT.T. TFT.F RI9F, PT.F.XAR 47.41,
nF.PARTMFidT TtITAT, ____} 1 ,I,9? 9`
F.idf;TNFRRTidf;
------------------------------
97nRnf, f'TTY C;ARA(;R RF.PATRR 4!9I, 1 ` 4'~
97nA1,? KTMRAT.T. At'F. HARI7WARF, 14ATidTIRF.PATR RTTPPT.TF.R f,.49
97n511 AT&T WTRFT.F.RS SRRVTf'i;R R/91, PAC;TNC; SRRVTf'F 1.=t_9n
TIF.PARTMFNT Tf1TAT, ____} '~~ 4:'
f;F.NFRAT. f;CiVF.RidMFidT
------------------------------
97n~n~, C'TTY f;ARAAF. R.RPATRR 4/9h `4 77
97n'~4R MF.MRFR fiF.R.VTC'F T,TFF M(~NTHT.Y FRF 1 nn _ nn
97n4?tl WAT.-MART FTRST ATT} STTPPi.TF.R 11 _41
97n4R? RFTHF.RFtIRT} PTIRT.TC'ATTi1tdR T.F.l;AT. Ni1TTC`F.fi ?94.98
97p4R5 MTR.F.X C'fTRP C:fTPTFR Tf1PdFR 847.5[1
97n45n TNf'f)t; 1 RT ATR T.F.rTS ARRF.~fiMF.NT R?9.5n
97(14+47 KTMT3AT.T. Af:F. HARTIWART? RF.PATRIMATNT STTPPT.TF.R 8.99
97n4R5 TRF.ARTIRF.R PETTY C'ARN RF.7MR T)f1f~ MF.Ai.R ?n?_74
97n`n5 tIKT.AHC)MA NATTIRAT. f;Ar, 4I9f~ TT~F. 9? _ n4
97n5nf, MC:T TT;T.F.C'f1MMTTNTC'ATTCTNR 4/9.5 tTSF. 4E,_47
97n5n7 PS(1 7/9f [T~F 1 ; R?4 _'~d
97n5n4 fitITTTHWF.~,TF.RN RRT.T. TT;T.F. 4!9I, PT.FXAR R?1 _R9
97n5n9 fit1TTTHWFRTFRN RFT.T. TF.I.F RI9i, NC1N-PT.FXAR 47.79
97n511 AT~T WTRT?T.F,Rfir,F.RVTt~F.fi 4/9.4 PAATidf; SF,RVTC'T; I,_95
1}F.PARTMF.NT TCiTAi. ____} R;47R-R1
Ri1PPilR.T RRRVT("FS
------------------------------
97n?4R RATT.F.Y F.nTTTPMF.NT T;CITTTP RF.PATRIMATNT 1nf,_R9
97nRn~S C:TTY AARAC;F. RF.PATRR 4I9f, 77_?4
97n4?n WAI.-MART ~ RT=PATR PAR.Tfi 41 _?R
R7n4I,R YAT.F. TTNTFfTRM RFNTAT. lTNTFfIRhT C'T.F.ANIRF.NT iR_?n
97n41,7 KTMRAT.T. AC'R HARIIWARF. RFPATR/MATNT RiTPPT.TRR 4?.19
97n511 ATkT WTRFT,F.fiS SF.RVTC'F.S 4I9f, PAf;TNf; .r,F.RVTC'F. ?I,.95
nF.PARTMRi7T TCITAT. ____} 4n7.?n
4
f'F.MF.TRR'r'
------------------------------
C:TTY C!F CiT~.i4~~~=~'i
(;T~?dFRAT. FTT1?ti
A IP ('t.A TMc RFfit1PT APAPVR PAf;F
---Pfl # ---------Vl?NT?f1R---------- ------T?F.SC'RTFTTTlTd-------- ---AMT1iTNT----
97nRri? KTMRAi.T. AC`.F. HARI?WARF MATNTiRFPeTR. PTTPPT.TF.P R_4n
97n5n7 PRtI 7194 TTgF 1 7 _ n?
T1F.PAP.TMF.idT T(ITAT. ____? 7G_4p
PCTT.Tf'F. SRRVTC'R~
------------------------------
~ 97nnn9 f;T.(1!'T{ TNf' TRA TPTTNf; f'T.F.Vi;T.AN17/FT)WART) 1 1 n _ nn
97nn11 T..F._T_Td_ PIIRRC`P.7PTTflid ~T~g_nn
~' 97nn?? MF.RTTITAN PT.A7.A NC}TRT. MT;Ai.F/T?ARF. TRATNTN~ 1 {?_4?
97n1 9? Nf1VA C'(1NFF.RFTdC:T? P.T?C;T.r,TRATTf7N 1 5n _ nn
97n'~OF, f'TTY f;ARAt;F. RFPATRP Rt9n 74/,_4/,
97nR77 T1_A_R,F._ AMF.RTf:A TF.Af'HTTdf; FTTPPI.ThS !9.55
~ 97n41 9 TTTRTdT{RY ~TfIRAt;R RTTdG 51 _7.~i
97n4?A F.TR f'(IMMTT1ti~Tf'ATTCINF RFPATR f'AMf`C1P.1?FR .~n_nn
97n4~9 T1AY TTMRRS TNC'_ IIFFTt'F PTTPPT.TF.S ?4_qn
97n44n PATRtIt. TF('HNT1T.f}C;Y TTTdTFC)RMP/Ff?TTTPMF.NT ?4q_:~n
97n445 TTTXAT.T. TTNTFCTRM ~ FflTTTP TTTdTFCTRM~iFC?TTTPMRNT h`.9n
47Q445 TTTX.AT.T. TTNTFTIRM R• F(7TTTP VT=HTC:T.F. FnTTTPMF.NT 5n^.4?
~ 97n45r4 ANC:HfIR PATNT TNTFRTC]R PA TNT ?5_qn
971145 7 fit1T.TC:F PETTY C'ARH TRAVF.T. F.XPFidSF-VARTt1TTP F,5. 1 Ft
97n457 P(TT.Tf'F. PETTY f'ARH RFTMT~ PETTY f'APH ,~_/,5
97n4.~i7 PCIT.TC'F PETTY f:A~H MF.F.TTNfi F.XP-PF.FR Rf1ARTl 19.51
~ 97n4l,? PHTT.T.TPF PTII.TC'F F.nITTP TTTdTF(?RM TZTTPPT.TF.^-, ?'~_qn
97n491 RART)Tl'. (":ARFF.T f'T.F.ANTTdf; f'ARPF.T f'T.FANTNf; 51 _5n
97n494 MArTX f'f1MPTTTFR PRfiT?T)t'T:= t'TITAPTTTRR RFPATR PARTfi 9!,
nn
' 97n495 .T _ i._ i.AWfif1N RF.PT.Af'E RfITITP _
g7. 1 g
97n5n5 ilT{T.AHtIMA NATTIRAT. f;Afi R/9,4 iI~F 41 _ 1 F,
97n5nF, MC'T TF.T.F.C'iTMMTTNTC:ATTtTNfi !?/9E TifiT? RF,_!~4
(• 97n5n7 PPfI 7/9h TIFF. 7n/,_9n
97n5nl~ fit1TTTHWF.GTF.RN RF.T.T. TF.T.F. A.~9f PT.F.XAR 7~~_~q
97n5n9 STItTTHWFfiTF.RN RF.I.T. TF.T.F Rf9,4 NT1N-PT.RXAP. .gq_{T7
97n511 ATSGT WTRFT.F..rr, fiF.RVTf'F.R R/9F, PAf;Tidf; SF'I?VTC'F. 84.95
TIRPARTMF.NT Tt1TAT, ____? 4~nR9.19
~, Pt1i.Tf'E C`tIMM[iNT('ATTf1Nfi
------------------------------
r
97nRn9 AT.T. ('T1PY RIIPPT.TF.r, PRTNTF.R. RFPATR ?75_nn
97n4?7 H(1WAR11 RTAMPF.R REPF.ATFR RFPATR !~1 ,nn
T1F,PARTMF.NT Tf7TAT, ____} '~5l, nn
' A1dTMAT. ('TINTR(1T.
------------------------------
f T T ~' rip f't'! 4 `._; =;f
f~FP:FRA.T. FTiP7T7
fi/8n!4F. fi~1?'1:5 Ap ~.T.ATT~1!= RF1~f1~~T AFAPUR PAC;F'
FCf # VT?NT7fiR T~F.RC'RTPTTC)N AMCIITNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
4?n41~, RC1C;F.R vn~ TN~;TAT.T. ~;Tf;Pt ?rt.nn
4?n4~? Pf1T.TC'F FFTTY CASH FTTTHANA.^-,TA^-,RRVTf'F.S ?n _ nn
4?Ct4~? PCTT.T['T? ?FTTY T'A.r,H RF.TMR T'FTTY C'AFH F,_??
4? n`n? PRCl 7/9h TTSF 1 54 _ F,4
4?8`,Ctfi RCTTTTHW?;RTF.RN RRT.t. TF.T.F. fi/4F, PT.F.XAR. ?8.48
9?n~11 AT~T WTRRt.F.tiR ST=RVTC'F.R fi/4f, PAf;TPif; fiFRVTC'R h_45
T'tFFAR.TMFNT TCTTAT. ____} ?8?,.?4
FTR.F. SRR.VTC'RR
------------------------------
4?n14R F.VF. TNf:_ C'T.RANTNt; SiT?PT.TF.fi 175.8(1
4?n??h WAT.-MART CiFFTC'F. F.t7TTTP 11n.~ifi
4?n??fi t{TMRAT.T. Af:R NARnWARF RFFATR!MATNT RTTPPT.TRS 18fi_'?7
9?n?fit Vf1T.tTNTF.F.R. VCiI.TTNTF.FR FTRF. RTTN~ 887 _ nn
47nR?,4 CTWARRCI TTRF RARN VT=HTC'T.F. TNfiPRf'TTC]Nfi ?5_nn
4?n841 TPTi}F.RT=NT3rNT TF~,TTNt=, T.ARfi i.ATlT?FR TRRTTNC; R4~_Rtl
47n4fi4 TRT;APTTRFR PRTTY f'AfiH RF.TMR FFTTY C'ARN 8_?;
4?n5n5 f1HI.AHTIMA NATTIRAT. rAS fiJ9l, TTRF. 54_?n
4?n5(1f, MC'T TRT.T;C'CfMMTTNTC'ATTf1NR fi/45 ITRR ?R_7?
4?n5n? FfiCT 7/4F, TTRF. fi19,11,
4?n5nfi ~CiT1THWFPTF.RN RF.T.T. TFT.F. fi/4!, RT.F.XAR t4fi.?8
4?n51 t AT~T WTRFi.F,R~ RF,RVTC'FR fi/4f, PAC;TNR RT;RVTf:F. 47.1,n
T}F.RARTMFNT TCITAT. ____} ?F?n4.14
C:TVTT. T1FFF.N~F.
------------------------------
9?n4?? fiTANTlART1 A[ITC! Rt1PRT.Y RATTRRTEfi-FMRR RTRFN ?n9.4n
4?CtSn? Pfif- 7/4f, TTRR 1+4.14
47n5nfi R(1[TTHWFfiTFRN RF.T.T. TFT.R R/4f, PT.F.XAR ?4_Rf,
4?n5n4 SCITTTHWF.RTF.RH RF.T.T, TF.T.R 8/91, NCTN-PT.F.XAR 5n.??
T)F.PARTMF.NT TCTTAT. ____} 849.1?
RTRF.F.TR
9?nn5fi RRTTRHHCTC; ~FRVTC'F.S MC1W T.AT{FRTT]rF '~/14/9F, 45n,tln
47nn54 P.RITSHHCIC; SF.RVTC'F.R MC1W '~-T,AT{F.S R11419F, 5nn,nQ
47nnh8 T7[TT}T.RY ,Tf7ttRfi MCTW F.T. RTCf 8119!4,5 ?4 _ nn
4?~n1,4 T)TTT)T.F.Y ,Tf1NF.R MiIW F.ARF.MF.NTR 8114/4~, ~i?.nn
47nn,55 1}il1}T.F.Y ,T(1NT3c MC1W ATC1R 8/14/41, ?4.nn
4?nnn~ nrrnT.F.v ,TCINF.R F,T. R.Tf1 FRCINTAC;F. 8l14!4F, 184_nn
h
t;FAIFRAT. FTTNT'T
Q/;0!9h S~i' 1 "' 1 n A /P f'.T.A TM.^-, P'FFCYRT APAPVR PA~~R'
P(i # VF.NT'1f1R T1Ffi~:RTPTTC1Td AMCITTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
r
~ 9?0:~0r, C'TTY ~,ARAC;F. RF.PATRfi 819,4 fi,44_A7
9?0:;?,? KTT*ifiAT.T. A!'T? NARTiWAP.R MATTdT/RRPATR PTTPFT.TFR ?9,4_fJ9
9?0405 f,RT;F.Td f'f1TTPdTRY t]TTTT)~fIR T?nTT !'TiATNfiAW A??_9F
970405 (;RT;FTi f'flTIT3TF.Y CiTTTT?f1fMR Ff7Ti C'tIT-fiFF SAW ?R(1_;~(i
97(141 4 PRfI PATC`Ti PfTTTiff1.F RF.PATRR '50.00
y 9?04?9 ST~NAT.TF.K TNt' TRAFFTf' ('f1NTRflT. MATTiT 498_?~
970505 nKT.AHCIMA NATTTRAT. C;Afi R!9h itfiF. ?0.87
97050? P.^,t7 7/9r, T1fiR Rh?,P{1
9?0508 fif1TTTTiWF.fiTF.RN RF.T.T. TF.i.F 819,4 PT.RXAR ?'~ _ 9R
970511 AT&T WTRF.T.F.Rfi fiRR.VTf'.F..^S :R/9r', PAf;TTi(; SF.RVTC'F ?0_f25
T7F.PARTMF.TiT Tt7TAT. ____} 4_?_~(s_??
f'nMMTTTtTTY f'F.iiTFR
------------------------------
9?04'?1 f1FFTt'R MAX fIFFTC'F RTiPPT.TRfi ??_99
970505 f1KT.AHt1MA NATTTRAT. f;Ac R19f: TTfiR 5?_45
97050n Ml'T TF.T.F.t'f1MMTTNTC'ATTf1Nfi ~{/9r', t1fiF .'~1
970507 Pfi(1 ?/9f, TTfiF. 1 _ ?7P _ 1,.4
9?050th Rf1TTTKWF..^,TFRN RRT.T. TFT.F P/9r. PT.F.XAR 149_ri?
T)F,PARTMFTiT T(1TAT. ____} 1.50~t_90
PARK MATNTFNANC'F.
------------------------------
9?080,4 1'TTY rARArR RF.PATRR R/9h ??_'~4
9?04;4 MTRAC'T.R R.F.f~RRATTCIN F.nTTTP RT.FAC'KF.RS-RPfIRTRPARK 11f~;R_R4
970448 f:HANTIT.FR MATFRTAT.fi t'(1NC'RF.TF. PTPF. iR9.ry0
970444 RATT.T;Y RCiITTPMF.NT WF.F.I7F.ATF.RIF.I7AF.R PARTR ?8.7+5
970479 ATi(':Ti(lR ST(lNF ('Tl R.(1C:K-SPtIRTfi PARK ?55.1 r4
9704?9 ANf'Hf1P. fiTf1NT? f'fl RTIf'K-SPf1RTS PARK 1 ? _ 1,R
9?048? ARi.EY (1WF.NS M(1W AT(1R 80.00
97048? ART.F.Y t1WF.NR MC1W F.T,M f'RF.F.K ?85.00
970507 Pfifl 7/9F, TifiF 1 _ 0?9 _ f,R
970511 AT£T WTRF.T.F,RR SF.RVTC'F.S R/91, PAf;TNR fiARVTC'T? 18.90
nFPARTMFNT TIITAT. ____} R.f,9?_57
FiiNT) T(1TAT. ____} ?F,T99?,?1
1
Wf1RTfFRfi' ~'iIMP .^-.R?.F-TPdP T'T APd
.'?;'?(1/9~. P' 17' 1 !, A /T} ('T.ATMfi RFT'(1RT kT3A13VR fiA ;T;
F(l # VRNT1~lR nFR('RTPTTt1N AMiltTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
~;FNFRAT. ~;C1VT;RidMT=NT
------------------------------
97(11 94 T]R STANT.FY RMTTH t; HAT.F.Y %!?1 !9n '~~ _44
97Ct~RR WtIA.KMFi) T T(1WNfiF.NT) I,/?7/9f~ iF~_Rft
97t1'~f,/, WARREN t'T.TNT(' T)AVTn WARREN 411R/9F. 7t1_tlCt
97f1'~!?1 f-WAS^Cl T1R[Tf; (; HAT.F.Y 7/!=t/9F, f~P_79
97f1RR1 (IWA~S(l nRtTf; C; HAT.FY 7/f~/9,~ 1 C1?. ;9
9?(144? ST_ .TC1HN'~ MF.nTf'AT. f'F,NTF.R M f;TfiT.F.Y ?/5/9F, 114_R@
1•~EFARTMF.NT TCiTAT. ____: 4(l/,.7?
1
FTTNT) TCiTAT, ____) 4(lf:_7?
AMRtTT.AhTf'.T; SF.T?VT~:T; F??Nr]
~tlR~!!4'f 4' 1?' 1 t A!P f'T.ATM~; PT;Pf1RT APAPVR PA!;T= _
Ptl # VF.NTZElT; T}RR('RTPTTi1N AMt1TTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
AMRTTT.ANf'F.
------------------------------
~ ~
9?fi14? T=.VR TNC'_ f'T.F.ANTNf; fiTTPPT.TT;R 4R_~t!
9?(1??7 PAf:F. PRtl13ITC'TR (1F TTTT.RA T1i AMR[TT.ANf'F. fi(iPPT,TF.R Rq . ~~
970841 AT.T.TANf'F. MF.T)Tf'A1.~ TNC'_ AMRTTT.ANt'F fiTTPPT.TFR 51p.55
17T?PARTMT?NT T(1TAT, ...=3 f+RS r 1 5
FTTNTI TC)TAT, _.__) f,'~5~1~
t:TTY nF n:~lA~Fn
('TTY f;ARAf;F
A/P C'.i.ATM^ fiFPnRT AFAPVR PAC;R' 1?
Pn # VRNT1nR 17F.Rf'RTPTTnN AMnTT1dT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
('TTY f;ARAf;F.
------------------------------
9701 f1R AT.T.TF.n Tf1WTNf; TnWTTdf; SRRVTf'R-T.n11Ai. x,0.00
970?55 WF.T.Rf'n TTdf' f`YT.TNTIF.R RF.NTAT. 1 1 R _?R
970?R7 r.Rnw RTTRT.TN(;AMF. RFPATR RTiPPT.TF.S 87.17
97A?R7 f`RnW RtIRT.TNf=,AMF RFPATR RtTPPT.TF.fi ?_70
97(1?R7 f`Rt1W RtIA.T.TNf;AMF. RFPATR PARTR 800. 1 fl
970?f~7 C'RnW RQRT.TNf;AMF. MATT. TnnT.R 99.95
97(1?90 T1dTRRSTATF. RATTF.A.V RYfiTF.M RATTFRTF.fi 110.9(1
970ROF, (`TTY ~ARAf;F RF.PATRR 8/9+4 15.9A
97041' f;ARY nRR RT1Tt.T1TNf; RFMnT1RT. ?f~0.00.
97(!417 AMF,RTt":A17 TRtiC'K RAT,VAf;F. FTRF. F.N~TNF. HtIR 95.00
97(14?0 WAT.-MART RMAI.T. TnnT.R 78.79
9704?0 WAT,-MART nFFTf'F. fit1PPt.TFR 11 ,94
97(14?1 nFFTf'F MAX TART.F 79.99
9704.5? YAT.F iINTFt1RM RFNTAT, tTNTFf1RM f'T.F.ANlRF.NT ?R_f0
9704f,F, nWA~Rn TTRF. BARN TTRRR/RFPATRR 554_ft0
9704h7 KTMRAI.T. Af"F. HART)WARF. RF.PATR!MATNT RTTPPT.TF.R RO_!3?
970470 RT[; "A" ATTTn PART, TTTI.fiA RFPATR PART 89.79
97(147? TkW TTA.F. f`n TTRF^-,-T.nnA1. R?9.54
970478 FRTf`TTnN PRnTI RRAKF RRAKF RFPATR PARTfi ?00.90
971147E .TERRY WnnT1.+', WF1.T1TNf; RFPATR RATWTTdt; MnWF.R ?5.00
970489 MTTIWFSTF,RN F.f1TITP rn f:nMPRF.F.rnR PARTr, 1??_:~`
970490 F.NT.nW FnRTI TRAf:TnR= TTdf' PARTR-fiATWTNf; S?.4:?
970505 nKT.AHnMA NATtTRAT. f;AR Rl9f, tTSF RR_?4
97050(, Mf'T TFT.Ff'.nMMTiNTf:ATTnN.^, ~ti9~, TTfiF 5_nR
970507 PSn 7/9~ t1~R 1.,7_?7
970508 Rf1tiTHWFFTFRN fiRl.t. TFT.R R!9/, PT,FXAR 4P_79
970511 AT°rT WTT~FT.F.S~ SRRVTf`T?F Rt9,i PAi;TTd~; SFR`rT('F. F,.95
I1F,PARTMF.NT TfiTAT. ____} 8.511.74
FTTNT] TCMTAI. ____} Rz511.74
C:APTTAT. ThiPRfiVR?!TT??dT^.
P?"?n.-"~.~ :~t' 1 ?' 1 ,~, •A la ('.i.A TRTP RFPnuT APAP~JP PAf;F'
P(l # VF.Nn(1R T)F~!'RTPTT(')N AN(-1iTNT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
r,FNFRAi, rf1VF,RNhtFNT
------------------------------
9?n4F,7 kTMRAT.T, Af'.F NAP.T~WARF RFMCfT)F.T.-MATFRTAi.^ 151 .1f
T)RPARTMF.NT Tt1TAT. ____? 151 _1r`,
PTRF.F.TR
` 97n:~9? PF.PPT C':t1T.A f'fIMPANY
T)T?PARTMF.NT TTITAT. ____~
FTTNT7 Tf1TAi, _ _ _ _ }
~T[~?d-PRI~~RT?^F A~ PRtIMTSFT? ?,in _ nn
?~,n _ nt~
411 _1F,
1
rTTV f7T= ~,~:~A~=,=,,
!~APTTAT. PRt1,TF~:T~ (;RAhTT
~; RCi !4~ R • 1"• ? ,5 A iT' C'T.k7?.G RT?T~r1RT AF`dP'?R F~A~;*-'
Pf1 # VF.PdT)f1R. TIFS~:RTT'TT~'!AI AMC~TTTdT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
!":T'7Rf;-FT',TF. PRF.f'TfiTCIN PRt1,TRC:T
------------------------------
4'?~4?P TN~tlt~
TIF.RARTMF.HT Tf1TAT. ____)
FiTNT`i TCiTA1, ____}
~;RAN>7 TfiTAT. ____~
Al1MT?d ~FRL Tt'T;
?!T _?~l
it _ 94
?i!_94
1 ~'~_ ;~7_?4
i~
cITY of owASSo
A/P TRANSFER REPORT
VENDOR
TRANSFERS
CITY GARAGE
WORKER'S COMP SELF-INS
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND
TRANSFERS TOTAL
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,333,33
TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 8,845,83
TRANSFER FROM AMBULANCE FUND 13,825.00
TRANSFER FROM E-911 FUND 1,443.75
27,447.91
CITY OF OWASSO
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/17/96
OVERTIME TOTAL
DEPARTMENT EXPENSES EXPENSES
{{~~........ ++//yy. ~~. F ~;7pyFf Fj ~ rf.
::::
Finance 0.00 7,954.54
?1.~~•~~n~iy ~~v~~l~~}J,Lx~AS~
k
s'u'%/i h::s.F~f ~xS
J,•ttti y:~
ac
f~dl ~~:.'~~,a~' ~`,' ~.~klkss
...,
< ,.... ,o
MunicitF~~al Court ~
.
>
0.00 1,481.39
..^s:.»>:.• ?y?r,;/.`::; `:2:;•::..,.:..y~
.::~i~U:<'..... . .........................
..:.,
::: r..: •::::::.,•::::..
~'~y, ~y~ ..f .:::::.:::::: •.::.
7!~'~!
rf..:::.+..:::::: 4:::
:: ~; }' ..
2.:::.:::•:L'J. ~:::. :::::..'::.: ::.~'•...w:.h.~..xxn:!~4\in:~i.:tt$~H%iC.S$):):~::w:\'4v:•. .rs<aew.:,.,w ,•`•ah:H..;.u
~i::.:.::•:: •:.
~
5.::+i SF
'~:~.•::n:.iv~in'vwV'.:U' q.yf:r..,a:.y...
f
w .
C
Support Services 3,260.12
{':.::•Sif!rfiiyispY.•'f.•:•%~C~..~tr:}~iy::~;•.•%•d:K'v'i<^: :~4'rr',:}+:•,~'L;
.:f': i:4: i''Fri,:•:•::r ijti v:S;:. : i..{::::v.: :i4•+~:•:::•~•}~i~;•~:,~y}.4}+.4:.:.•i
~~pp~~,,: /. r•::.}5':•}:%•.'4::42; q•.vtfF:: {~
,.;~:
~~~-%~Yn'.:4::5{• : :.:.: :.: ....45:2.44;>.•Yf'i$:i4: ':liM1i~•4• ii it R'v
\:ki•:ri4:i455: ii5:55,:4ri~~{Fi~h4y~4 v fl~I//fJ.y,H•.,v..}:.wr:..f
:. ti'kir'::: }. '.~
•. ...~ '?e~'.~6
'::f%:ii:::2:i4i.. .Y'. ., ~..'...'.iiL:.P.
:~' Jli::L4.•..x:ww. ~!,~'.~,:.•'•,.••,'M ~v..,vf ,:ffi:{b
:i}F}.. ~~ .
~~~•::.•~'..•1~•:;9 ~ '~••.~~,.
L(!A •••.W~ 45,~7~~~~'l:
.L+i:4:' \\ri
Central Dispatch 4,858.47
..
v'•}t*r..n.',{4,v, ;:i iY 4.•425.. t..{~
•• :FFiS• ::•,+J.Sr,I~'rir i\\ '` •:
A ;.
• :. •.;;'.::!' ' •.4,:. •:?'~`• r,^~, '••
•......
.,.
...:
': ~h5•:l ~ jj
''+`•i
Fire 840.96 32,331.33
i:?..:: nf'vn y{G.;.;:iJJ~S},?,J,~2? ::. ~i•!:::; :ti f;tfJ~J +wrr•..rf,.^:,~.{Svv...55
••; v: +;5 .; f {F.:iii :4i'v:i'S5:'y :+..'fi'S~ ' . yJ:::}'<iiiii i!r• /r{{:: r:::::v5:•5:•
.,4i}•:~{ {;}•:Y,:+. i54 2~v 1~+1,Ykiti rNl~ '. O.}•{;. •: v.:'w.. /%fir.'.r •' f is iiii:>:~~f• .•~•~:•, :. ':::.
:•lhAt3a`7.2;:`",~`•:•ti.`1.1~x•.s::.•Ch:4Y:S.'',t,:kk~~^'uixASF•.,•5::;~:;:i2?;ax::l:i:i:St :::'t~~~:.'t}/•v.,:. ~':•'
{' ~.+~C~•~ : ~::1 ~
}:;:
.,':,''<:w\ ' ..,:~' • /.fR•:.1.... •:v
Community-Senior Center 0.00 2,706.14
^
'4~,r.;r..::,rr{r~/~'•~.: rm.' .~4~si. 7 Y`?~`•`••:~Y.::
•: :R:4y'?•iii•.:}•~...•.•i,'x•.rn'.•:.'.::vi::ti.+.k•,'<•:•~ir/' ~..Y:Lti .•:
., }iw;{i,Y,.•,•+.~i{\;5 '.ih: i`. iC:'+!
'•SA:2i: '~
2:
• :~ ~~`:v:::. :r.?~. +.^,.
i'' ;'•
:: }i.•J\2. ••
'S'
3'aiafa2't~ o'ww' :J?:
~`2?7;:
~ }"v ,: M1`: '~:•: r
{{ll.. /r' is p
2
3'
~wv
,
., 4Mx:vi::vn:: ,~•:..a
Economic Development :
.
0.00 ..,~
1408.25
.. ......
..5 .:,:.::.:.
....'
..
..::
.; .
v
APPROVE 09/03/96
Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
CITY GARAGE
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/17/96
OVERTIME TOTAL
DEPARTMENT EXPENSES EXPENSES
Garage $0.00 $2,037.36
ff,.llf.5~l:•!>TYR: ¢*:PiPY:,4;fCG:,%fiG4' f~ ,r.~:fyJ //lf.;'£,r:;ir{q:;:y:;; FFf ?%f.!4iii:`•j~.i'f.~'~::?:f,Fl.:q%:;r?
... ~ .:
.:;.; ~ :Y,kF•~~~~p r ~~y .:::f it i.:•,4) •. 7 r :•: ~ 1::•i:•ii:•
.} frt. F,.$;:$,:;L: •v,{SY, ~.•r•i.: i'/rr~~ ,.,r+f~ L $i::•rr~ i~~:yiii::
:.t. ~. ..; .. y.~..,.; :
APPROVE 09/03/96
Mayor
Council Member `
Council Member
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 528
DATE: August 27, 1996
BACKGROUND:
At the August 20, 1996 meeting, the Owasso City Council approved a request to close a portion
of a drainage easement located on Lot 13, Block 1, Windsor Lake II.
Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 528 which formally adopts the City Council's action of
August 20, 1996.
RECOlVIlVIENDATION:
Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 528.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. 528
2. Subject Map
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
ORDINANCE NO. 528
AN ORDINANCE CLOSING TO PUBLIC USE A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE
EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN LOT THIRTEEN (13), BLOCK ONE (1), WINDSOR
LAKE II ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CTTY OF OWASSO, TULSA COUNTY,
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AND RETAIIVING UNTO SAID CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA, THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO REOPEN SAME WITHOUT EXPENSE TO
THE MUNICIPALITY, AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, has deemed it necessary and expedient to close
to public use a portion of a certain drainage easement, and
WHEREAS, said drainage easement is described as follows:
Commencing at a point 62.97 feet east of the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block 1, Windsor
Lake II Addition, thence northeasterly along the east side of the existing drainage easement
to the north line of Lot 13, thence westerly along said line 33 feet, thence south to the point
of beginning, located within the City of Owasso, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 11, Oklahoma Statutes, Section 42-110, the only holders of
a franchise or purported holders of a franchise that may purport to have a special right or privilege
to use said drainage easement are Public Service Company of Oklahoma and/or Oklahoma Natural
Gas Company, and/or Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and/or TCI Cable Television
Company; and .
WHEREAS, the above holders of franchise or purported holders of a franchise that may
purport to have a special right or privilege to use said drainage easement have waived their
objections to the closure of said easement, if any.
NOW THEREFORE, BE TT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA:
SECTION 1. That the following described drainage easement, be, and the same is hereby
closed to the public use, to-wit: Comminging at a point 62.97 feet east of the southwest corner of
Lot 13, Block 1, Windsor Lake II Addition, thence northeasterly along the east side of the existing
drainage easement to the north line of Lot 13, thence westerly along said line 33 feet, thence south
to the point of beginning, located within the City of Owasso, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
SECTION 2. That the municipality shall retain the absolute right to reopen the public way
or easement without expense to the municipality. Closing of the public way or easement shall not
affect the right to maintain, repair, reconstruct, operate or remove utility, public service corporation,
or transmission company facilities of service therein, nor shall a closing affect private ways existing
by operation of law unless released in writing executed by the owners thereof.
SECTTON 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the
same hereby are, expressly repealed.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma this 3rd day of September, 1996.
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Danny Ewing, Mayor
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ronald D Cates, City Attorney
O = 134.76 ~ ~~~ ~ 2.79 131.00
MQI 78° ~ 50
p ~ ~ ~ ~ R=25'
' ~ s2 ~ E. 93RD ~T. NORTE
O l w •- •~ ~--~s.2 N 89°48'24" W
~~
~ ~ 84.74 100.00
O ~° 5 S9 ~` 15'UE
I `^ X66 21.03 30' B
Z t~ ao I LDG L
4 I '` 1' (EA. SIDE) c,~.¢ .- 00 ~
I ^~ N ~- 7 .- ao a
Fj~ 'cD W ~ ~ ~ ~t
~ 10 U/E / ~ z ~. SIDE
s>2 ( )
H 589°55'21" E 1 .56 84.30 100.00
~'8b 6~~2
$~~? S ~ 175.56 158.48
~+ W~ B L K~ , o' u/E M
a~ j` (EA. SIDE
3 ~ I DRAINAGE ,~ u~ ~ o
ESMT 2 0 0 ` ~ ~ ~ 30' B
ly 0\
~~
M 00 roe ss ~` ~ ~ , 0 8 54.15 1
M;~ ~ ~-
~~ s s 4 ~ J~~ oo E. 92ND ~
Fj N s '` ~ o
i p N ~ ~ ?y ~ ^ `O i~pJv 00 N 89° 8'2~
~ I ~ ~ Q' p 69.51
3 ~ ~ ~.
f~0~1~lD~ T~ B~ LIOSE ~ `~ ~ ~ 30' B/L 3
N 55'21" W ao Z ~,., -~ NI
s2.s~ 176.52 ~ M ~ ~ m '~ N
176.52 f, ~~,o ~I (~
r ~ N 89'S5'2~~ w 5 00 ~ 119.51 cn
~ °• w I 43.50
I ~ 189.51
°~ N 40"' 11.36` E N 50'4' W o
.-~ J
15' U E I ~ ~ 6.60 '
/ I co
32.48 ~ ~ N 3'54'31' E
o' u/E
i ~ ~~ ,
15' U E w 20' U/E
I
~ ~ 1
.- d° I w ~
~ ~ ~ 10' U/E l
Ir
I ~~
• 44. • ~
~N 19'04'44"
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE #529
WATER RATE INCREASES
DATE: August 27, 1996
BACKGROUND:
The City of Tulsa has notified the City of Owasso of an impending change in the water rates it
charges its master meter customers. Effective October 1, 1996, there will be an increase of
thirteen cents per one thousand gallons of water purchased. That increase was adopted by both
the Tulsa Utility Authority and the Tulsa City Council. This increase is the second such rate
increase in the past five years to its municipal customers, and represents an attempt by Tulsa to
earmark funds to upgrade its Mohawk treatment plant and accomplish other capital projects.
The increase is based on a "cost of services" review of customers classifications and is in
keeping with a 1989 study that established that method of setting rates as one that was more
equitable to all customers. Prior to 1991, the City of Tulsa focused its rate increases on its high
volume municipal customers and did not impose increases on its Tulsa residents. Since 1991,
however, the City has implemented a "cost of services" rate philosophy. The result was that
Owasso and other municipal customers had no rate increases in 1992, 1993, & 1994, while
Tulsa resident rates were increased significantly. In 1995, Tulsa implemented an aggressive
program to update its treatment facilities and increased rates to both residents and its municipal
customers. An increase of thirteen cents per thousand gallons of water purchased was
anticipated in the 1996-97 OPWA Operating Budget (see page 9 of the budget). Therefore,
should the Trustees accept the staff recommendation, no changes are required to the budget
document.
PROPOSED RATE CHANGES:
Based on a staff review of the financial impact of the Tulsa rate increase and an analysis of the
~ financial position of the OPWA (conducted during the budget process), the staff position is that
only apass-through rate increase is needed at this time. An increase of thirteen cents per
thousand gallons of water purchased equates to a 4.5 % rate adjustment to our customers. The
table below shows the current rate and the proposed rates with the thirteen cent increase.
WATER RATE INCREASES
AUGUST 27, 1996
PAGE 2
PROPOSED CURRENT EACH PROPOSED EACH
TYPE OF CURRENT NEW ADDITIONAL ADDITIONAL
CUSTOMER BASE RATE BASE RATE 1000 GALLONS 1000 GALLONS
In-City 7.17 7.30 2.79 2.92
Rural 11.54 11.54 4.68 4.68
NOTE: City ordinance provides fora 20% discount for low income families who meet an
established criteria. Such discounts are not affected by this resolution.
NOTE: In 1993, the OPWA Trustees adopted a policy of a "phased in" program to equalize
the rate difference between "in city" and "rural" customers. The program is based on a concept
that recognizes that the city no longer utilizes property taxes on only those homes inside the city
limits to fund water improvements. Therefore, a rate structure that is truly representative of a
"cost of services" philosophy may have some slight difference in rates (because it is more costly
to deliver services to customers in a rural, less densely populated area), but that difference
should be based on a rational consistent with an objective formula and consistent with how we
demand Tulsa treats us as a customer. Thus the proposed ordinance does not "pass on" to our
rural customers the rate increase from Tulsa. If approved, the ordinance will maintain rural
rates at their current level and thereby reduce the amount of difference between the two rates.
The current rate structure has "rural" customers paying 67.74 % more than "in-city" customers.
The new rate structure will reduce that difference and require the rural customer to pay only
62.39 % more than the "in-city" rate. The reduction of 5 % in the difference between the rates
is the largest reduction since the equalization program was initiated. The staff evaluation of this
action concludes that it will not negatively impact the OPWA Fund or the Public Works
Department's ability to provide services.
CUSTOMER IMPACT:
The cost of the requested rate increase to the average customer is estimated to be $10.92 per
year (91 C per month) based on an average use of 7000 gallons water per month. Please note
that the impact on customers will vary according to each customer's usage.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends Council adoption of Ordinance #529, approving the water rates as set
forth by the Owasso Public Works Authority and providing for an increase in those to in-city
customers in the amount of thirteen cents (.13C) per thousand gallons.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance #529
2. Correspondence from the City of Tulsa
ORDINANCE NUMBER 529
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING THE WATER RATES
AS SET BY THE OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY PURSUANT
TO RESOLUTION #96-04 OF SAID BODY; AND AMENDING PART 17-
UTILITIES, CHAPTER 1 WATER, SEWER AND SANITATION
SYSTEMS, SECTION 17-109-WATER RATES; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; AND DIRECTING CODIFICATION.
BE TT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CTTY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA THAT:
SECTION ONE: The water rates hereinafter set forth as established by the Owasso
Public Works Authority, an Oklahoma Public Trust having the City of Owasso, Oklahoma as
its beneficiary, are hereby adopted, approved and duetted to be implemented in accordance with
Resolution #96-04 of the Owasso Public Works Authority dated September 3, 1996.
SECTION TWO: The provisions of the City of Owasso Code of Ordinances, referenced
as Part 17, Utilities, Chapter 1 Water, Sewer and Sanitation Systems, Section 17-109 Water
Rates, shall be amended as follows:
Section 17-109 WATER RATES
A. There hereby are established the following uniform rates for the volume of
water delivered during each calendaz month at each connection to the water
system serving one household or business located within the corporate limits of
the City, as shown by the water meter at such connection; provided that,
regardless of amount of water metered, the monthly charge for water for each
connection shall not be less than the "minimum charge" set forth:
WATER RATES (MONTHLY,
1. First 1000 gallons $7.30 (minimum chazge); and,
2. Each additional 1000 gallons $2.92
B. There hereby are established the following uniform rates for the volume of
water delivered during each calendaz month at each connection to the water
system serving one household or business, located outside the corporate limits of
the City, as shown by the water meter at such connection; provided that,
regardless of the amount of water metered, the monthly chazge for each such
connection shall not be less than the "minimum chazge" set forth:
1. First 1000 gallons $11.54 (minimum chazge); and,
2. Each additional 1000 gallons $4.68
PASSED AND APPROVED this 3rd day of September, 1996.
ATTEST: ,
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CTTY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
By:
Danny Ewing, Mayor
Ronald D Cates, City Attorney
OFFICE
OF
ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR
918 596 7274
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
200 CIVIC CENTER TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103
August 27, 1996
City of Owasso
Attention: Rodney Ray
207 S. Cedar
Owasso, OK 74055
Dear Mr. Ray:
On October 1, 1996, rate increases approved by the Utility Board and the City ~
Council will go into effect. Your existing water rate is $1.59 per 1,000
gallons, and your new rate will be $1.72 per 1,000 gallons, which is an effective
increase of 8.18%.
The Utility Board sent letters inviting customers to attend a meeting held
April 8, 1996, to discuss the proposed utility rate adjustments in water and
sewer.
If you have any further questions about your specific utility charges, please
contact me at 596-7274, City Hall, Room 512, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Buchert
Public Works Assistant Director ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWA5S0
THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET APPROPRIATION
DATE: August 29, 1996
BACKGROUND:
Since 1993, the City has embraced the concept of allowing its managers the use of a "carry-
over" budget appropriation. In fact, the Council has adopted that concept as a financial
management policy in each of the last three years. A "carry-over" budget appropriation is a
concept wherein budgeted, but unexpended, funds from one fiscal year may be rebudgeted
(appropriated) or "carried over" to the next fiscal year. The goal of a carry-over budget is to
encourage economy and efficiency in the use of public funds.
Traditional public sector budgets anticipate and reward the expenditure of all of the funds under
a manager's control during the twelve-month fiscal year. In spending all available funds,
managers are "justifying" a continued or even greater level of appropriations in following years.
Thus, efforts to be efficient and save money will often result in the reduction of future budgets.
The "carry-over" budget promotes a philosophy of "save it and invest it" rather than "spend it
or lose it". Managers who save money from last year's budget are rewarded by the possibility
of a carry-over appropriation to the current year's budget. This is the fourth year for the City's
managers to operate under a "carry-over" budget concept.
~ The "carry-over" budget concept is based on a business approach to government spending and
is a key element to our overall goal of fiscal efficiency. The success of the concept has not only
saved taxpayer dollars in the form of reducing spending, but has helped foster adecision-malting
process that is increasingly business oriented in both process and desired outcome.
REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET
AUGUST 29, 1996
PAGE 2
COMMENT:
It should be noted that the General Fund departments had a total of $168,035 in budgeted but
unexpended funds remaining from the 1995-96 budget. Of that amount, $129,125 was eligible
for carry-over appropriations request (unexpended funds from salaries and other personal
services line items are not eligible for carry-over). However, as you can see from the list
below, the General Fund carry-over requests were for only $50,925. The fact that, for the
second consecutive year the City's managers have not requested the full amount eligible for
carry-over, indicates how well the concept is working. It is apparent that the departments are
more confident in their ability to present new programs and services (or improve existing
services), justify those requests in the budget process and be funded based on the merits of those
services rather than simply relying on how much money was spent last year. That confidence
is shown by the $117,110 left in unrequested, but eligible carry-over funds. Those funds are
the best indicators of the success of the program and clearly show a more efficient and effective
use of the tax dollar.
REQUEST:
"Carry-over" appropriations have been requested for the OPWA Fund, Capital Improvements
Fund, Capital Projects Grant Fund, Garage Fund, and nine departments within the General
Fund. Those "carry-over" requests are summarized below. Some requests are for the
completion of projects and contracts funded last year, but not completed until this fiscal year.
Fund & Department
GENERAL FUND
Street Department
Engineering Department
Parks Department
Community Development
Animal Control
Support Services
Community Center
Purpose Amount
Paint Building $ 2,675.00
Fence Storage Area $ 4,000.00
Reserve for Equipment &
Design Criteria $ 3,500.00
Building Improvements $ 3,000.00
Utility Cost/Radio $ 1,000.00
Reserve for Future Vehicle $ 7,500.00
Inspector Radio $ 1,000.00
Reserve for Future Capital Outlay $ 5,000.00
Animal Traps $ 500.00
Paint 1987 Vehicle $ 200.00
Building Improvements $ 750.00
Vertical Blinds/Council Room $ 1,700.00
i~
i~
ii
ii
ii
REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET
AUGUST 29, 1996
PAGE 3
Interior Painting $ 1,500.00
Fire Department Beds & Mattress $ 5,000.00
In-Station Tone Alert $ 4,000.00
Station Vehicle $ 5,000.00
Uniform & Protective Clothing $ 2,000.00
Finance Department Moving/Remodeling $ 600.00
Reserve for Future Computer Purchase $ 2,000.00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REQUEST $50.925.00
OPWA FUND
Wastewater Department Wastewater Master Plan $19,200.00
Water Department Booster Pump Station $63,825.00
~ TOTAL OPWA FUND REQUEST 82 825.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
Equipment Storage Buildings Construction $80,000.00
~.
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND REQUEST $80.000.00
GARAGE FUND
Garage Refurbish Service Truck $ 4,385.00
Exterior Repairs-Building 50.00
TOTAL GARAGE FUND REQUEST 4 735.00
CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANT FUNDS
CDBG - NSP Project Water/Wastewater $19,009.00
~ CDBG -Wastewater Rehab Project Wastewater Improvements $65,516.00
CDBG -Precision Components Parking Lot $10,319.00
~-
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANT FUND REQUEST 94 844.00
Attached for your review are memoranda from managers or department directors explaining each
~ carry-over budget request.
REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET
AUGUST 29, 1996
PAGE 4
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends supplemental appropriations for the following funds:
GENERAL FUND
Street Department $ 6,675.00
Engineering Department $ 3,500.00
Parks Department $11, 500.00
Community Development $ 6,000.00
Animal Control $ 500.00
Support Services $ 950.00
Community Center $ 3,200.00
Fire Department $16,000.00
Finance Department 2 600.00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $50.925.00
OPWA FUND
Wastewater Collection $19,200.00
Water Department 63 825.00
TOTAL OPWA FUND 82 825.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
Equipment Storage Buildings $80.000.00
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $80,000.00
GARAGE FUND
Garage 4 735.00
TOTAL GARAGE FUND $ 4,735.00
CAPITAL PROJECTS -GRANT FUND
CDBG - NSP $19,009.00
CDBG -Rehab $65,516.00
CDBG -Precision $10,319.00
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANT FUND 94 844.00
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Department Requests
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
FROM: SHERRY BLSHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CARRYOVER BUDGET REQUEST
DATE: August 23, 1996
After the year-end closing, the finance department FY 96 budget had an unencumbered balance
(excluding the personal services category) of $2,670.35. A carryover budget supplement of
$2, 600 is requested.
Carry-over budget funds are requested for the following:
• Miscellaneous expenses associated with moving and remodeling the finance department
offices. Amount requested: $600.
• Future computer equipment purchases. $2,000 was carried over from the FY 1995 to
the FY 1996 budget and is requested to carryover again to the FY 97 budget. The
finance department currently uses two PC's loaned from other sources (one from the
Chamber of Commerce and one from a staff member). Amount requested: $2,000.
-_ ~ ~
NI~MORANDUM
TO: Sherry Bishop
FROM: F. Robert Carr
Public Works Director
~~" ~~
SUBJECT: CARRYOVER BUDGET REQUESTS
DATE: August 23, 1996
Proposed items for carryover from the FY 95-96 Budget are presented on the attached sheets.
A summary of these items is as follows:
Engineering
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQiJIPMENT
Account Number: 51-170-5441
Scanner and software
Proposed carryover budget: $3,500.00
Streets
Line Item: IlVIPROVEMENTS -NOT BUII.DING
Account Number: 51-410-5430
Paint exterior of Street building Proposed carryover budget: $2,675.00
Fencing of storage area Proposed carryover budget: $4,000.00
In addition to the above, the following project costs need to be carried forward:
Wastewater Master Master Plan (61-530-5310) $19,200.00
Equipment Storage Buildings (81-210-5421) $80,000.00
i~
i~
Public Works Department
Engineering
Carryover Budget Proposal
FY 1995-96
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
Account Number: 51-170-5441
Proposed carryover budget: $3,000.00
FY 1995-96 budget (excluding personal services): $9,417.00
FY 1995-96 actual: $6,122.24
FY 1995-96 remaining: $3,294.76
~ Commentazy:
" Scanner and intelligent conversion softwaze: The Engineering Division is prepazed to develop
~~ a comprehensive design criteria and construction specifications document for use in the City of
Owasso. Prepazation of the document will encompass detailed text and drawings for
infrastructure construction.
"
Most of the available drawings to be included in the document will need to be copied and re-
" drawn into the AutoCAD format presently used in the city. To expedite this process, it is
proposed to scan existing drawings and solicit other available information and drawings from
similaz area organizations.
. Cost of a suitable networkable 8'fi" x 11" or 11" x 17" scanner is approximately $2,000.00.
Softwaze with intelligence to convert scan data to AutoCAD format is expected to cost
approximately $1,000.00.
C
Public Works Department
Streets
Carryover Budget Proposal
FY 1995-96
Line Item: IMPROVEMENTS -NOT BUII.DING
Account Number: 51-410-5430
Proposed carryover budget: 56,675.00
FY 1995-96 budget (excluding personal services): 5105,555.00
FY 1995-96 actual: 595,455.68
FY 1995-96 remaining: 510,099.44
Commentary:
Paint Exterior of Street Maintenance Building: Construction of the equipment storage structure
and replacement of the roof to the existing building was completed in August 1996. In order to
provide a uniform appearance to the building and upgrade the overall aesthetics of the area, staff
elected to paint the exterior of the building the same color as the roof and equipment storage area
(the colors of these facilities were selected to match other existing city-0wned structures in the
immediate area). A local painting contractor was selected for the project at a cost of 52,675.00.
Fencing the storage area: Equipment and materials used by the Streets Division are to be stored
in the area east of the existing building and the new storage structure. The designed layout was
selected to enable the area to be fenced for added security and to limit accessibility.
Approximately 400 LF of 6-foot fencing and gates are included in the project. The gates are to
be installed on the Birch Street trafficway south from 5th Avenue to enable ingress and egress
to buildings on 5th Avenue during flood conditions. Based on preliminary quotes, costs for this
project are expected to be approximately 54,000.00.
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY J RAY
~' CITY MANAGER
SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CARRY-OVER BUDGET REQUESTS FOR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AND PARK MAINTENANCE
DATE: August 26, 1996
~ The following requests for carry-over are being requested for the Community Development and
,~. Park Maintenance Budgets.
Community Development Department
I am requesting $6,000.00 for carry-over within this department. The $6,000.00 would utilized
to address unanticipated needs for additional equipment within the department as a result of a
position transfer from the fire department. New furniture and a hand radio unit are just a few
~, of the anticipated needs.
" Park Maintenance
The Parks Department is requesting $11,500.00 for carry-over purposes. $3,000.00 is proposed
° for needed furniture and completion of the new park maintenance facility. $1,000.00 is for
~ unbudgeted utility costs which will accompany the new facility and a needed communication
radio. The remaining $7,500.00 is requested for future vehicle and access drive needs at the
Sportspark.
If you have any questions, or if I can be of assistance, please contact me.
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY J. RAY
CITY MANAGER ~
Iqo
FROM: M.A.ALEXANDER~~
CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT: CARRYOVER BUDGET FOR ANIMAL CONTROL
DATE: August 12, 1996
This memo is a request for consideration of a carryover budget for the Animal Control division of
the Owasso Police Department. The year end totals reflect an excess of 512.12 within the 200,
300 and 400 series of the budget of animal control. I realize that this is not a huge amount as
compared to other departments, however this amount does reflect 3.6 % of the total budget of the
animal control division, (excluding the 100 series).
If approved, this $500.00 will be used toward the purchase of additional beaver traps, and cat and
dog traps which were not budgeted in the 96-97 animal control budget.
Your consideration in this request is appreciated.
i ~~
-=1 iNAI SFRUTrFS
51 ~?n 51n1
I ~?n 510,
z?n 51 ;n
ri1 8?n 5111
~ ,,~1 '1?n 5;?n
I .4?n 51:0
-.1 8?0 51'it
~1 4^0 ~u1
1 8''n Sif,S
1 8?n 5171
TiFPARTMFNT - ANTttA! r11NTFtnI
AAI aRTF4 G War,FS
nVFRTTMF
FTra
RFTTRF?4~NT lnMRFI
l9`dF14P1 nYMFNT TN.~IIRahr.F
MFnirra TN~Ilaaur.F
l i FF T N.41 ~tANrF
TIITTTnN RFTMRIiRSFMFNT
TNrFNTTVFS
IINTFnRM AI I fTWANfF
r.TTY nF nWA=gin
ANNIIAI RIITiRFT PRFSFNTATTnN
FnR PFRTnTi FNriTtdn .II IN 1??~.
TnTal PFFtSIIAIaI SFRVTrFS
":a~F4` TA1 S k 411PF1 TFR
S1 8?n 5^,In nFFTrF F!!¢FI TFS
1 .;?0 5??n nPFAATTNr, Rl~P1 FF4
W:,1 8?n 5^.?t IINTFnRhl9 & FRfiTFrT'TVF r1 nTHTNn
51 8?n 5?5n RFPATR & MATNT RI~PIIF4
~ 1 '~?n .~i7~n UFNTr7 F MATtJTFNAtJrF
1 8?n 5?hi ca~ru Tt~ ~ Fill
51 870 5?9n MTRr a1PPl TFS
TnTAI MATFRTAI r, ;r SIIPPI TF.r,
RUrr.FS x, nTI~R r.~r~tr,F~
1 8?n 541n PRnF !. TFf`N RFR~1TrFR
`..1 8?Q 58?1 In"11 TTtFS
51 8?0 5880 RFPATR >4 MATNT 4'FRUT(`F.r,
" 1 '~?n 5.471 TA FPl-UYJF
i :~?n 5s4n TRAUFI >Y TRATNTNn
51 8?n 5848 ib FS k FFFR
TnTAI SFRVTrF.4 >4 nTF~R TT1aRnF~
TAPTTAI nlm AY
1 a?n 5d?n
..1 8?n 5d8n
5} 8?n 544!
1 8?n 54d?
1 8?n 5aa4
Ailil nTNr, TMPRnVFMFNTfi
TMPRnUFMFNTS
MArNTNFRY lG FAIITPMFNT
VFN1T9 FS
FIIRNTTIiRF & FTXTIIRFS
TnTAI raarTal nlm aY
TfITAI ANTMAI f71NTRn1
i
MTV t aril IA1 Y ~ ~ arTi IAI
44.?t
9f .R^
?f.. rd7
. nn
?55. nh
9.84
. nn
.nn
.an
4ft9.9?
.nn
7n1 _''?
145_tn
78.5.4
.nn
7? .^-.?
. nn
1 ndd.?4
rl F~FS PAf:F: t
RI Inr,FT Ftdri IMR I R~F>'?rl IMA 'L I I.SFTi
1.`: 5:~;.?n 1R 4nn_txt
" _n0 ? 71l,_7n
• S Sr
?l,5.57 5nn.00 .nn ?'{d.d,4 ~;.tn
1 nR5.5?
~ 1 ?'in.nn
" .nn 144.41 ,?4.?(,
anh.SR 9an.nn .nn 5:,•4.a? a~.?5
1n5_n? 1n7.an .na ±.?1 •~•~[_?t
^,'~??.?F. ~ 187.8n .nn ~:i7.74 7:{_'?9
4.4.78 #18.(k1 .0n '•4.?? 7;_5.7
.nn .nn .rift ~ _an .nn
.nn .nn _nn .on .nn
.nn .nn '.nn .nn _nn
19"R8d_1? ?4":~?7.nn .nn 4:4??.4R R1.~4
'';'`.h4 ?5n_nn .fat? 1»_:i~i ?».?h
5?[1.97
~ ? J,fH1.nn
" .fit ?.n:{ 99_F=~
hh4.?a 7nn.no .f,n ^.`;.7f. 9»_49
778.17 ?4n.nn .nn f•.4.: 97.5l,
8h.4? 4n_nn .nn 3.14 9?_n5
d4?_a1 ~~nn.no .nn 57.5? t,~_44
_~a _nn .nn .nn .nn
d ?a8.?5 a 87n.nn
.nn 1?F,.75 97.10
?n_ftn 4n^..5n 450.00 .ftn 47.50 P,~.4»
?45.74 ? (~;'1.5~5
" ? 180.00
" .nn 11,.44 ?9.'
.On 8l,Q.~.4 400.(X1 _n(1 .^,9.87 ?n.tl,
.nn 8n9..'i d?n.nn .nn 110.45 78.70
.nn d?R.h7 500.00 .nn 71.'1.4 85.78
.0n .n8
- .nn .(X1 _nn _nn
8n5.74 --- -
8,5.44.91 ----------- ----
;"870.00 -------- --
.nn ----------
?l;5_n9 -------
9?./~4
?.7:^.^1 5".;91.9f, 5,490.00 .nn ?R.n4 9R_?1
_nn .nn .On .(Xt .an .fK,
_nn _no _nn _nn .nn .nn
_nn 9.9f• 10.00 _nn .rt4 99_f,('t
~7.4n
---- ~?7.Rn 4an.nn _nn ^.^n 99.'14
-------- -
"a~n.n1 ----------- -
5"7?9.7? ----------- ----
5,4`1n.nn -------- --
.nn ----------
1nn.?4 -------
94_?4
f,"?n?.95 8^,,'19?.On ..^,4"8?7.nn _nn 5 nns.nn 8!,_97
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY J. RAY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ~ ~`~JIlVI McELRATH, SUPPORT SERVICES DIItECTOR
SUBJECT: FY96 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE CARRYOVER BUDGET
REQUEST
DATE: August 21, 1996
COMMENTS:
Because of timing involved in the transfer of the Vehicle Maintenance service truck from the
Fire Department, we were unable to accomplish the refurbishment and equipping of the
vehicle before the end of the fiscal year. Also, due to the relocation of the full Support
Services staff to the Vehicle Maintenance Facility, it is necessary to do some remodeling and
updating. Finally, we have recieved transfer of a 1987 Chevrolet Caprice from the Police
Department to replace the 1981 Ford Fairmont, which is need of repair costly beyond the
vehicle's worth. There is enough surplus money in the 5200, 5300 and 5400 categories of
the budget to accomplish these items. All expenditures would be carried out immediately,
upon approval of the request.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend the following items for carryover expenditure from the City Garage budget for
FY96:
1) Service truck:
Paint exterior $1500
Refurbish interior $400
Lightbar $700
Push bumper $500
Winch $1000
Jumpstart set $135
Handtools $150
Subtotal $4385
2) Chevrolet Caprice:
Paint exterior $500
3) Remodel and refurbish facility:
Interior $700
Exterior
Total $5985
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY MANAGER
RODNEY RAY
FROM: COMMUNITY CENTER DIItECTOR
JANIS WORLEY
RE: CARRY OVER BUDGET
DATE: August 23, 1996
BACKGROUND:
Community Center has a total of $2,294.00 in the 5200 series and the 5300 series from the
1995-1996 Budget Year. The Community Center is a multi- use facility and I feel there is a
great need for this facility to have a better look inside. I feel the facility not only needs to
be painted but also needs new vertical shades in the council/dinning area, in the recreation
'" area and in the ceramics room. This item would not only help with the utilities bill but
would add a lot to the look of these rooms. These rooms have not been painted in many
years.
FUNDING:
~ The estimated cost of vertical blinds for these three rooms is $ 1,700.00
The estimated cost of painting all three rooms is $1,500.00.
Staff is requesting a carry over budget of $2,294.00 from the Community Center 1995-'96
Budget.
Staff is also requesting that we be allowed to carry over the remainder of the cost in the
amount of $ 906.00 from the 1995-'96 Recreation Center Budget.
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF THESE TWO TASKS WOULD BE $3,200.00
Staff was very conservative in the spending of the Recreation Center Budget due to the
transition of the YMCA and the center and would like you to consider this unusual request to
be able to use some of those funds for the improvement of the Community Center.
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY RAY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: BOB ALLEN, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: CARRY-OVER BUDGET `96-'97
DATE: August 23, 1996
BACKGROUND?:
T,~rt fie~.al ~,~ayr~ ~ 445_46 tl:e Fire Department budgeted for purchasing beds and a tone alert
system. Due to an unexpected delay in researching for a reliable vendor and proper equipment,
we were not able to purchase these items before the end of FY `95-'96.
The Fire Department is rPrniPCtino the carry-Dyer funds tptaling ~1 F~Q~Q,f1~
Y"- •• "'-'i7
RECC~ivuvlviv va T iviv S:
CAPITAL OUTLAY $14,000.0"u
Beds and mattress 5,000.00
In-station tone alert 4,000.00
Station vehicle 5,000.00
MATERIAI, AND SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS AND PROTECTIVE CLOTHING $2,000.00
The union contract was not settled until after the FY `96-'97 budget was approved. Funds were
not budgeted for uniform replacement as stated in the contract.
Attachments: Memo -Capital Outlay Committee
MP.mn -Acct C`h~Pf Stuckey
(In-Station Tone System)
Memo -Capital Outlay Committee
(Station Vehicle)
C: \...\llATA\C RYO V I297. MEM
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: BbB ALLEN, FIRE C13Y~F
FROM: CAPITAL OUTLAY COMMITTEE
d
. SUBJECT: 96 - 97 BED AND MATTRESS PURCHASE
d
~ DATE : August 22, 1996
a
We now have three price q~gtes on beds ar~d mattresses . These items ire i ric 1 uded
in the Capital Outlay Plan for 1995 - 1996. The beds will be replacing the beds
that are over 11 years old. The beds have three drawers underneath them to
' accarrnodate bed 1 i nen for a 11 three shift m~ribers ut i 1 iz i ng the bed. These beds
should have a life expectancy of 10 to 15 years. We will also have to purchase
mattresses to fit the beds. The lowest price quote we have received is from
~ North Carolina Furniture Mart. The three quotes were as follows:
North Carolina Furniture Mart $443.00
Heilig - Meyers Company 500.00
JC Penney Caipany 547.00
Thc~~ quotes include mattresses and bed frames. To fill all spaces that were
designed for beds in the station, we would need to purchase 11 beds. The total
~ cost for 11 beds at $443.00 each will be $4,873.00. I have also included a
voting sheet where two beds were chosen and a majority voted for the Bassett
beds. The capital outlay committee thanks you for the opportunity to submit
t input into the budget process.
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOB ALLEN, FIRE CHIEF
FROM: MARK STUCKEY, ASST CHIEF
SUBJECT: IN-STATION TONE SYSTEM
DATE: August 22, 1996
~~~e have received a pace quote on the tone system. This item eras included n uhe 1Q95-1QQ6
Capital Outlay Plan. At the present time, the fire fighters are alerted to an emergency situation
by portable radios placed at various locations within the Fire Department. Not enough radios are
available to allow all azeas of the station to be within an audible range. Also, the life span of the
radios is signifieantly re~dueed when they aze left on for 24 hours a day. This system would
ensure that the portable radios are fully chazged and ready for use on the fire scenes. Z'he life
span of this system should be approximately ten (10) years from the date of purchase. If
$4,000.00 was allocated, it would cover the price quote of $3,617.45 and any other unexpected
expenses.
i~
i~
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHIEF ALLEN
FROM: ASST CIiIEF STUCKEY
SUBJECT: STATION VEHICLE CAPITAL OUTLAY
DATE: August 23, 1996
There has been $lO,Onn ~n ~"~RPtP/I fnr the „nrr`hacP of a ctafin„ ~/Plitr`1P 4ftPr rn„e„lt;„c, rhP
VV. V VM~LSViV~11Vt 411V 11 W1 V11lLUV Vl N UN~iLVll V1LLVlV. L4LVl VV1WLliLlals LLLV
state bid list, a vehicle that would meet our needs can be purchased for $15,000.00. This vehicle
would transport fire fighters and equipment (hose, air bottles) to a fu-e scene without taking an
emergency vehicle out of service for these tasks. The type of station vehicle that is being
con~ides~ed is a ;tan pickup. This vvhiclc could tranapnrt ~ fire fighters and equipment tca a
scene.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ALLAN E. HARDER
PERSONNEL OFFICER
SUBJECT: PROPOSED PERSONNEL POLICY CHANGE
DATE: August 28, 1996
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to a request by the City Manager, the staff has completed a review of the City's
policy relating to tuition reimbursement and, if deemed necessary, how that policy may be
changed. That review has indicated he city has an adopted policy relating to tuition
reimbursement contained in "chapter 5, section 10, subsection A" of the "CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA PERSONNEL MANUAL, dated July 1, 1992. Further, the policy
also contains a method of amending the document should such change be desired by the City
Manager and City Council.
The policy relating to tuition reimbursement states:
An employee may be reimbursed one hundred percent (100%) of the general
enrollment fee for tuition expenses upon satisfactory completion (minimum grade
"C") of a course or school that is directly related to his job duties or in pursuit of an
undergraduate degree. The course(s) on which reimbursement will be requested must
be approved by the Department Director prior to enrollment (Personnel Form number
10). If a personnel form number 10 is not on file in the personnel office,
reimbursement will not be made. Fees for advance standing credit hours will not be
~ reimbursed.
The intent of the original policy was to encourage employees to seek educational
advancement as a means of increasing their productivity and value as an employee of the
~ City. Additionally, the City wanted to recognize that such advancement also benefitted the
employee, therefore the cost should be shared by the employer and employee. Thus, the
' City policy reimbursed only tuition cost and did not allow reimbursement for book cost, or
fees (tuition is about one-half of the total cost of a class). Additionally, the Policy's
language referred to reimbursement for course work in pursuit of an "undergraduate" degree.
While graduate degrees were not expressly prohibited, some interpretations of the policy do
not include graduate courses as eligible. The City Manager believes there are those
occasions when advanced degrees are of benefit and value to the City and, thus, should be
r
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
AUGUST 29, 1996
PAGE TWO
eligible for reimbursement in the same manner as undergraduate tuition. However, since ~
advanced degrees are not needed in every position , it is the staff's position that prior
approval should be granted by the City Manager for such graduate course work if
reimbursement is to be made. Based on those considerations, it is the purpose of this
memorandum is to present a change in the policy that would allow the City Manager to ~
authorize payment for tuition reimbursement to employees who are pursuing advanced
degrees provided, however, such course work is authorized by the City Manager prior to this
initiation.
HOW CAN THE POLICY BE AMENDED?
Chapter 1, Section 3 AMENDMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION, of the CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, PERSONNEL MANUAL, dated July 1, 1992 states:
"The City Manager may amend these rules and regulations when deemed
desirable and necessary in the best interest of the City and with approval
of the City Council. The City Manager will provide notice to all City
employees prior to the Council action."
The City Manager has in fact deemed it desirable to recommend an amendment to the policy ,!
and by this memorandum request Council consideration of such change. The notice to
employees requirement could be met through the official posting of the Council agenda in
compliance with the open meeting requirements. This however, does not meet the intent of
the policy. Therefore, a memo to all Department Directors has been developed for
dissemination to all employees. "~
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Tuition Reimbursement Policy be modified to read as follows
(bold text is used only to distinguish the added text):
An employee may be reimbursed one hundred percent (100%) of the general
enrollment fee for tuition expenses upon satisfactory completion (minimum of '
grade "C") of a course or school that is directly related to his job duties or in
pursuit of an undergraduate degree. The course(s) on which reimbursement is ~
requested must be approved by the Department Director prior to enrollment
(Personnel Form number 10).
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
AUGUST 29, 1996
PAGE THREE
Employees may also be reimbursed for satisfactory completion (minimum
grade "B") of courses taken in pursuit of a graduate degree. The course(s)
on which reimbursement is requested must be approved by the City
Manager prior to enrollment (Personnel Form number 10). Approval 6y
the City Manager shall be made following the City Manager's
determination that the course and graduate degree will benefit both the
employee and the City of Owasso.
If a Personnel Form number 10 is not on file in the personnel office,
reimbursement will not be made. Fees for advance standing credit hours will
not be reimbursed.
ATTACHMENT:
Copy of notice to employees
MEMORANDUM Chief Maria Alexander/Chief Bob Allen/
Ms. Sherry Bishop/Mr. Robert Carr, Jr./Mr. Jim McElrath/
Ms. Angela Remke/Mr. Tim Rooney
TO: ALL DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS
FROM: RODNEY J. RAY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF PERSONNEL MANUAL
DATE: August 29, 1996
It is my intention to seek a modification of the Personnel Manual, Section 5-10
EDUCATIONAL COMPENSATION at the September 3, 1996, Council Meeting. The
modification sought will allow the City Manager to reimburse employees for tuition when
seeking graduate degrees when, in the opinion of the City Manager, the degree will benefit
the City of Owasso.
Section 1-3 of the manual establishes the process for amending and implementing amendment
to the manual, including notice to all city employees prior to council actions. Please
disseminate this proposed change to your employees.
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO RENEW JUVENILE JURISDICTION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF OWASSO AND OKLAHOMA DISTRICT
COURT SERVING TULSA COUNTY
DATE: August 30, 1996
BACKGROUND:
On February 16, 1993, the City Council first authorized the Owasso Municipal Court to enter
into an agreement with the Tulsa County District Court for the purpose of allowing the
Municipal Court to assume jurisdiction over certain juvenile misdemeanor offenses. Those
offenses covered in the agreement included vandalism, shoplifting, trespassing, assault, assault
and battery, battery, truancy, disorderly conduct, and public intoxication. The purpose of the
arrangement is to encourage local communities to provide some for of "early intervention" in
an effort to prevent young offenders from re-entering the justice system again and again.
Subsequently, on August 16, 1994 and again on July 11, 1995,. the Council approved renewals
of that agreement. Since initiating the agreement, the Owasso court system has processed a total
of 320 juvenile offenders. In conversations with the Police Chief, City Prosecutor, Municipal
Judge, Court Clerk and City Attorney, it is apparent that all of the involved parties agree that
the program is worthwhile and should be continued.
Even though the Council has approved and renewed this agreement, the Attorney General has
ruled that these types of interlocal agreements must be renewed each year. The proposed
renewal agreement contains no changes from the 1995 document and extends the agreement to
June 30, 1997. The agreement is attached for your review. Additionally, please note that Mr
Cates, City Attorney, has reviewed the agreement for form and content.
RECOMMENDATION•
The staff recommends Council approval of the renewal of the Agreement for Municipal Court
Jurisdiction of Juveniles, and that the Mayor and Judge be authorized to execute such document.
REQUEST TO RENEW JUVENILE JUSTICE AGREEMENT
AUGUST 30, 1996
PAGE 2
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Correspondence from Judge Hilsabeck
2. Renewal Agreement
3. Memorandum Dated February 16, 1993 (Background Information)
4. City Attorney Opinion #93-2 (Background Information)
i~
ii
,, MEMORANDUM
^
TO: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
FROM: HONORABLE MICHAEL HILSABECK
MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE
SUBJECT: RENEWAL AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL COURT JURISDICTION
OF JUVENILES
~ a DATE: August 30, 1996
Since the juvenile program was approved by the City Council and initiated in 1993, it has proven
to be a successful program. We have had 320 juveniles successfully complete a combination of
,, community service, counseling, and restitution, along with various safety reports, and pay the
minimal court cost. It would appear that this agreement is helping the City of Owasso and the
' State of Oklahoma reach the goal of curbing the number of repeat offenders, thus reducing the
w number of juveniles that would be transferred to the Juvenile Bureau District court. Based on
our experience, I would recommend that the City Council approve the renewal agreement and
r authorize the Judge and Mayor to execute the document.
G
><20NALD D. CATES
Attorney at Law
Suite 680, PazkCentre
525 South Main
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
918-582-7447
August 28, 1996
Rodney J. Ray
City Manager
City of Owasso
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055
Re: Agreement for Municipal Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles
Dear Mr. Ray:
FAX 918-582-0166
1
1
1
In accordance with your request, I have reviewed the proposed Agreement for Municipal ,
Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles. It is my opinion that the revised Agreement for Municipal
Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles between the City of Owasso and the District Court in and '
for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma is in accordance with the authority of 10 O.S. Section 7303-1.2
E, the enabling legislation under which municipalities are authorized to assume jurisdiction for certain
specified juvenile misdemeanor offenses pursuant to interlocal agreements with the District Courts. ,
Accordingly, it is my recommendation that such be submitted to the City Council for approval.
The documentation provided to me by you is the original. Therefore, I have executed such
in the appropriate place and am returning such to you.
RDC:Ijs
enclosures
1
1
1
1
~vtiaiu L. •,a~w
City Attorney
1 '.
' AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL COURT
JURISDICTION CONCERNING JUVENILES
This agreement is made by and between the Oklahoma District Court serving Tulsa
County, otherwise known as Judicial District 14 (District Court) and the City of
(City), under authority of 10 Oklahoma Statutes § 7303-1.2 E under
which municipalities are authorized to assume jurisdiction of certain specified juvenile
misdemeanor offenders, pursuant to interlocal agreements with the District Courts.
The express purpose of this agreement is to enable the City to establish, develop, and
implement various prevention or early intervention programs for local juvenile misdemeanor
offenders. By implementing such a program, the resources available to the District Court can
be focused more efficiently on more serious juvenile offenders, including felony offenders and
juveniles with significant histories of repeat offenses.
DURATION
~ This Agreement shall be in effect from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. Thereafter
' this Agreement may be renewed for successive one year periods corresponding with the City's
~ fiscal year of July 1st to June 30th. The Agreement shall terminate automatically on June 30th
of each year unless the District Court and the governing body of the city renew the Agreement
~ for another year. If either party desires to terminate the Agreement, the terminating party shall
' notify the other party in writing of its desire to terminate by May 1st of the fiscal year preceding
termination.
' Either party may request a modification of the agreement b makin a written re uest
Y g q
identifying the desired amendments, or the subject matter thereof, at least forty-five (45) days
1
in advance of the negotiations concerning such amendment.
OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY
1) The City may assume jurisdiction of offenders who meet the following criteria:
a. Are under eighteen (18) years of age;
b. Are not presently under the supervision or treatment of the Tulsa County District
Court system and do not have charges pending there;
c. Have been charged for violating municipal ordinances relating to trespassing,
public intoxication, vandalism, theft, assault, battery, assault and battery,
truancy, curfew, possession of low-point beer, possession of alcoholic
beverages, disorderly conduct, or failure to appear for a court appearance or
comply with a court order;
d. Have not been certified as an adult for any purpose pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7303-
4.3 to the best of the City's knowledge.
2) Upon conviction or upon admission to a deferred sentence program, punishment and
conditions of probation imposed may include any one or all of the following:
a. A fine not to exceed the statutory maximum of the Municipal Court;
b. Community service work, not to exceed ninety (90) hours, in lieu of a fine if the
product of multiplying the number of hours of community service work by the
prevailing minimum wage does not result in a number which exceeds the
maximum fine authorized by law;
c. Restitution; Counseling or other community-based services; and
d. Court costs.
3) The City shall keep all municipal arrest records, prosecution records, court records and
court proceedings for cases involving prosecutions under this contract confidential and
shall not open them for public inspection except by order of the Municipal Court or in
conformity with the statutes or regulations adopted pursuant to 10 O.S. § 620.6 and 10
O.S. § 7005-1.1 through § 7005-1.8.
4) If a municipal citation is written to a juvenile meeting the above criteria, the Municipal
Court hearing date shall be indicated on the citation and notification of the citation(s)
2
~ shall be mailed to the parents, guardian, or responsible adult relative of the juvenile. If
the juvenile is arrested and meets the criteria set forth under the contract, under
circumstances where the citation and release procedure would not be appropriate (e.g.
intoxication), the City shall make reasonable efforts to locate the parent, guardian, or
responsible adult to take custody of the juvenile or may temporarily detain the juvenile
~ pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7303-1.2(E)(2)(3) and (4).
5) The City shall provide to the District Court law enforcement reports and related
documents for all juveniles referred to the District Court for prosecution and all juveniles
who will be prosecuted for misdemeanor criminal offenses in the Municipal Court.
Reports regarding juveniles who will not be prosecuted in either court shall not be
~ forwarded to the District Court. It is expressly understood that prosecution in Municipal
Court will constitute a bar of double jeopardy against any subsequent prosecution in
District Court for the same offense.
6) All fines and administrative fees generated as a result of prosecution of juveniles under
"
this contract shall be placed in one or more special accounts, and used solely to fund:
I~ a. Local programs which address problems of juvenile crime, including without
limitation offender counseling, early intervention, community service and teen
court programs;
b. The costs of prosecution;
~ c. The costs of detention; and
d. Administrative costs related to local programs that address problems of juvenile
" crime or related to the prosecution, detention, or punishment authorized by
statute.
e. Subject to audit by District Court or designee.
~ 7) The City shall provide the District Court a copy of the most recent audit report of its
Municipal Court operations for each year during the life of this contractor any extension
3
thereof. It is understood, however, that this Agreement does not impose any additional
record keeping requirements on municipal governments or officials.
8) Representatives of the District Court and the City shall meet periodically to share
information and to review and evaluate the success of procedures implemented to
prosecute and treat juvenile offenders.
STATUS OF VARIOUS EMPLOYEES/JOINT PROPERTY
No joint employment is created by this agreement for any purpose and each party will
be solely responsible for the payment of their respective expenses, including, but not limited
to, wages, salaries, and consideration paid on subcontracts. No joint property shall be
acquired.
NOTICE
In the event parties need to discuss specific problems, or in the event any notice
required under this contract needs to be served, the City may be contacted through the Office
of the
The District Court may be contacted through the Office of the Chief Juvenile Judge at 315
South Gilcrease Museum Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74127, (918) 596-5971.
4
Dated this day of , 1996.
Chief Juvenile Judge
Juvenile Division of the District Court
14th Judicial District
Approved as to form and content:
District Attorney's Office
Approved by City Council of the City
1
~" Attest:
City
Mayor
Municipal Judge
content:
5
City Attorney's Office
~o~vDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL N~ZBERS
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J. RAY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT
BE ~ ~ CITY AND DISTRICT COURT PROVIDING FOR
LOCAL COURT JURISDICTION IN CERTAIN JUVENILE
MISDEMEANOR OFFENDERS
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1993
BACKGROUND
The 19911egislative session passed House Bill No. 1761. that amended Title 10, O.S. Section
1102(E). The legislation allowed local municipal courts; if authorized by. their City Council,
to enter into an. agreement with .the district court to assume jurisdiction of cases involving
children under eighteen (18) years of age who have been charged with violation of municipal
ordinances relating to vandalism, shoplifting, trespassing, assault, battery, assault and
battery, truancy and public intoxication. Under the enabling legislation, the municipal court
may impose fines,. community. service requirements, restitution to victim(s) or any
combination as authorized by law. Additionally, the court may require the child to receive
counseling or other community based services designed for prevention or early intervention
impact. ~ - .
The legislation focused on two goals.. One of those goals was to -allow the local jurisdiction
an opportunity to get involved in juvenile cases early- with Local programs and local,
lmowledgeable people.. The rationale being that local people will have a stronger
commitment to solving their own juvenile problems as well as a better knowledge of what
solutions best meet the offenders' needs. The second goal of the program is to reduce the -
district's juvenile court case load so that it can focus on the more serious (felony) juvenile
offenders within a reasonable timeframe. -
The agreement is attached for your review and requires Council approval and the Mayor's
signature as well as the signature of the Municipal Judge. This agreement is an opportunity
.for the municipal court to deal with a misdemeanor juvenile offender quickly and in a
manner that will have a positive impact on the youth. It should be noted, however,- that
there are costs that may be incurred. In approving this. agreement, it should be understood
that the municipal court must provide each juvenile offender with- those same statutory and
constitutional protection as does the district court. The right to counsel is one of those
statutory guarantees. In cases involving indigent persons (in this case juveniles) wherein the
accused cannot financially afford an attorney, the municipal court must appoint and attorney
and pay the costs of representation. While that situation is a possibility, the staff projections
JUVENII,E COURT JURISDICTION
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
PAGE TWO
are that it will not occur. This agreement allows local jurisdiction only in misdemeanor -
- cases, wherein, court appointed counsel generally would not be an issue.- Last year, the
- Owasso police filed 54 juvenile cases in District Court and no one requested public defense.
It should also be noted that any revenue derived from fines assessed to juvenile offenders is
required to.be used for funding local programs which address problems of juvenile crime.
Those monies must be in special accounts and will not go to the general fund. Two of the'
uses being considered for those funds is to employ a part time Community Service
Coordinator with counseling experience, or the establishment of a teen court program, It is
not expected, however, that the program will actually produce substantial revenue and it may
well be that very little fine money is generated by this program. - -
C011~MENT
1. This program is strongly supported by the municipal court. The Judge has been
involved in our staff discussions since the contract was received. Additionally, the
City Attorney and City Prosecutor have been a part of the evaluation team and both
are supportive of the program.
- 2. Because of the juvenile court's caseload, juveniles who violate .minor misdemeanor
' ordinances are often not dealt with until three or four months•after the offense. Even
then, the sentence usually consists of probation. This kind of slow" justice gives rise
to a feeling that the system can be beaten and often results in additional offenses
~• while the youth is awaiting adjudication of his/her first offense. Ho full the
Pe Y~
agreement will allow city courts to act quickly and effectively in dealing with the
offender and therefore mandate that juveniles must be accountable for their actions.
3. 1VIr. Cates has rendered an opinion relating to the statutory guarantee of legal counsel.
That opinion is attached for your review.
~ECOM1VVfENDATION -
The staff recommends Council approval of the attached contract between the Owasso
Municipal.Court and the District Court providing for Municipal Court jurisdiction for certain
juvenile offenders as provided for by law and authorization for the Mayor to execute the
~ contract. -
' ATTACHMENT
1. Proposed contract between District Court and Municipal Court
2. City Attorney's Opinion
j k/counciU0201693. CRT
'-
RONALD D. CATES
Attorney at Law
Suite 680, ParkCentre
525 South Main
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
918-582-7447
FAX 918-582-0166
February 5, 1993
Mr. Rodney J. Ray
City Manager
City of Owasso
207 South Cedar
Owasso, Oklahoma
74055
In Re: City Attorney Opinion 93-2; Agreement for Municipal
Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles
Dear Mr. Ray:
I am corresponding with you for purposes of addressing the
issue that we have discussed frequently of late concerning whether
or not the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, would be required to appoint
counsel for a child found to be without sufficient financial means
to retain counsel when such child has been charged in the Municipal
Court under authority of the Agreement for. .Municipal Court
Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles now before the City Council for
consideration:
• . I . must; at;:•the outset ,advise you that -~t<here is.a divergence of
opinion ~~on:- the :part.: o•f . citys' attorneys around the : state , on this
point. Such. differing .views are essentially attributable to
disagreement .over whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of
the United States Constitution, compel provision of counsel to a
child without sufficient financial means to obtain counsel. It is
opined that such Constitutional provisions do not mandate provision
of counsel for an indigent child unless the child faces the
possibility of incarceration or the proceeding itself could result
in a termination of the parent/child relationship. Neither of such
actions can result in a municipal court prosecution pursuant to the
jurisdiction assumed under the Agreement for Municipal Court
Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles.
However, I am of the opinion that the foregoing does not end
the inquiry concerning the existence of a right to counsel which
may have as it's genesis something other than Constitutional
mandate. Unfortunately, as is evident from the foregoing, there
exists no opinion dealing with this issue from the Supreme Court
of the .State of Oklahoma or the Court of .Criminal Appeals of the
State-of.:.Oklahoma.. ..Accordingly, resolution,of this issue requires
consideration of pertinent statutory provisions contained within
the Oklahoma Juvenile Code, 10 O.S. Section 1101 et seq.
Initially, it should be observed that the proposed Agreement
For Municipal Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles arises by
Mr. Rodney J. Ray
February 5, 1993
~ Page 2
virtue of enabling legislation now codifed in 10 O.S. Section
1102(e). Such section provides in part as follows, to-wit:
A Municipal Court, if authorized by the governing body
of the municipality, may enter into an agreement with the
District Court to assume jurisdiction of cases involving
children under eighteen (18) years of age charged with
violating municipal oridinances relating to vandalism,
shoplifting, trespassing, assault, battery, assault and
battery, truancy, curfews, possession of non-intoxicating
beverages as defined in Section 161.2 of Title 37 of the
Oklahoma Statutes, possession of alcoholic beverages as
defined in Section 506 of Title 37 of the Oklahoma
Statutes, and public intoxication. A child under
eighteen (18) years of age may be charged and prosecuted
for violating such municipal ordinance provided that the
maximum fine which may be imposed shall not exceed the
maximum fine authorized by law. ...
Such statutory provision, as well as the remaining portions of the
enabling legislation codified in this section, provides no express
guidance on the procedures or protections to be afforded in the
Municipal Courts exercise of this jurisdiction. In the absence of
r such express legislative direction, the municipality is essentially
left to speculate on what was the legislative intent on such point.
' In that regard, I am of the opinion that the silence on the part
of the Leglislature suggests an intent, even if unexpressed, that
the procedure to be employed in the Municipal Court when exercising
~ jurisdiction over the juveniles in the delineated offenses, is the
procedure and protections heretofore required of the District Court
in it's exercise of such jurisdiction. Support for this position
may be found in recognition that essentially the enabling
legislation, as well as the agreement provided for therein, results
~ in the delegation to the municipality of jurisdiction possessed by
the District Court. It is important to note in this regard that
the District Court is_not divested of jurisdiction in the juvenile
offenses but merely authorized by the enabling legislation to, by
agreement, delegate same. Reason would suggest that the statutory
' procedure and protections now required of the District Court would
likewise be required of the Municipal Court as a delegate to whom
has been delegated or commissioned to act on behalf of the District
Court in these categories of juvenile offenses.
~ With the foregoing in mind, reference to statutory provisions
Mr. Rodney J. Ray
February 5, 1993
Page 3
of the Juvenile Code of the State of Oklahoma, 10 O.S. Section 1101
et seq, in particular Section 1109 thereof, provides the following,
to-wit:
A. No information gained by questioning a child nor any
evidence subsequently obtained as a result of such
information shall be admissible into evidence against the
child unless the questioning about any alleged offense
by any law enforcement officer or investigative agency,
or employee of the court, or the Department is done in
the presence of parents, guardian, attorney, or legal
custodian of the child. No such questioning shall
commence until the child and his parents, or guardian,
or other legal custodian have been fully advised of the
constitutional and legal rights of the child, including
the right to be represented by counsel at every stage of
the proceedings, and the right to have counsel appointed
by the court if the parties are without sufficient
financial means; provided, however, that no legal aid
or other public or charitable legal service shall make
claim for compensation as contemplated herein. It is
further provided that where private counsel is appointed
in such cases, the court shall set reasonable
compensation and order the payment out of the court fund.
B. ...If the child is not otherwise represented by
counsel, whenever a petition is filed pursuant to the
provision of Section 1103 of the title, the court shall
appoint a separate attorney, who shall not be a district
attorney, for the child regardless of any attempted
waiver by the parent or other legal custodian of the
child of the right of the child to be represented by
counsel.
Reference to Section 1103 of Title 10 of the Oklahoma Statutes in
particular Section 1103(b), provides the following, to-wit:
B. A petition in a juvenile proceeding may be filed by
the district attorney or the person who is authorized to
make a preliminary inquiry to determine if further action
is necessary. The proceeding shall be entitled "In the
matter of an alleged (delinquent)
(deprived), child or (a child alleged to be in need of
supervision) or (a child alleged to be in need of
Mr. Rodney J. Ray
February 5, 1993
Page 4
treatment)".
The petition shall be verified and may be upon
information and belief. It shall set forth (1) with
particularity facts which bring the child within the
purview of Chapter 51 of this title; (2) the name, age
and residence of the child; (3) the names and residences
of his parents; (4) the name and residence of his legal
guardian, if there be one; (5) the name and residence of
the person or persons having custody or control of the
child; (6) the name and residence of the nearest known
relative; (7) the relief requested; and (8) the specific
federal law, state law or municipal ordinance under which
the child is charged, and an endoresment or witnesses
intended to be called by the petitioner, where the child
is sought to be adjudged a delinquent child under Chapter
51 of this title.
As may be gleaned from the foregoing, were a child to be dealt with
by the District Court in a juvenile proceeding for violation of a
federal, state or municipal law, such would result in application
of the requirements of 10 O.S. Section 1109(b). Therefore, reason
suggests that a proceeding in the Municipal Court pursuant to the
Agreement For Municipal Court Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles for
the delineated offenses is in essence one and the same and would
~ allow no less. Accordingly, if one accepts the foregoing as a
sound comparison, then one must assume that the statutory dictates
above set forth would compel provision of counsel.
Based upon the foregoing analysis, I am of the opinion that
the municipality must provide counsel for a child charged in the
municipal court pursuant to this assumption of jurisdiction if the
child is not otherwise represented by counsel and it is found that
~ said child is without sufficient financial means by which to obtain
counsel. Although provision of counsel to a child without
' sufficient financial means to obtain counsel may not, under
existing United States Supreme Court pronouncements, be mandated
by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
' Constitution, I nevertheless am of the opinion that it is under the
statutes of the State of Oklahoma. Accordingly, it is my
recommendation to the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, that if the City
is desirous of entering into the agreement for Municipal Court
' Jurisdiction Concerning Juveniles, then a procedure should be
designed to assure provision of counsel to a child charged in the
Mr. Rodney J. Ray
February 5, 1993
Page 5
Municipal Court, pursuant to the assumed jurisdiction when such
child is found without sufficient financial means to obtain private
counsel.
I hope the foregoing meets with yo r n ds at this time.
Should you have any questions er commen~, co ~erning same, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
cerely,
Ronald D. Cates
City Attorney
RDC/nhc
~oxArmuM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
~ SUBJECT: DISCLAIlVIER OF INTEREST IN CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS
DATE: August 29, 1996
ii
ii
I~
BACKGROUND:
This agenda item relates to a legal action taken by the state of Oklahoma (Department of
Transportation) against the Osage Railroad Company. The action is to acquire property to
construct or maintain state transportation system facilities.
The City Attorney has reviewed the matter and can find no interest of the City of Owasso in and
to any real property located in Osage County, Oklahoma. Therefore, Mr Cates has requested
that the matter be placed on a City Council agenda for authorization to prepare a "Disclaimer
of Interest" to be filed on behalf of the City as a recommended course of action.
RECOMI\~IENDATION:
The staff recommends the Council take action to authorize the City Attorney to file a disclaimer
in the matter of the State of Oklahoma vs Osage Railroad Company.
ATTACHMENT•
2. Correspondence from Mr Cates
RONALD D. CATES
Attorney at Law
Suite 680, ParkCentre
525 South Main
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
918-582-7447
August 12, 1996
Rodney J. Ray
City Manager
City of Owasso
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055
Re: State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation vs.
Osage Railroad Company -Case No. CJ-96-132
Dear Mr. Ray:
FAX 918-582-0166
I enclose herewith an Amended Petition in Condemnation, a Report of Commissioners, as well
as a Notice in Condemnation Proceeding transmitted to me by Marsha after such was duly served ,
upon the City. I reviewed this matter and discussed same with the attorney for the Department of
Transportation as well as with Marsha Boutwell, City Clerk, and no one can apprise me of any
interest the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, would have in and to any real property located in Osage '
County, State of Oklahoma. To protect the City's potential interest in this case, I have filed an Entry
of Appearance. However, it does appear to me that the City has no interest and accordingly should
file a Disclaimer of Interest in the proceedings and cease any further participation. If you concur with '
this recommendation, then I would request this matter be placed upon a convenient agenda for
authorization from the City Council for me to file a Disclaimer of Interest in the proceeding. ~
Should you have any questions or comments concerning same, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
RDC aj s
enclosures
City Attorney
IN THE-DISTRICT-COURT OF OSAGE COUNTY-
STATE OF OKLAHOMA r
' State of Oklahoma, ex rel. )
Department of Transportation, )
' Plaintiff, )
vs. )
' Osage Railroad Company, a Subsid- )
ary of Southeast Kansas Railroad; )
Missouri Pacific Railroad aka )
MoPac; City of Owasso; City of )
Skiatook; Crain Feed and Farm )
Supply Company;.Skiatook Green- ~ )
~ house; G&R Trucking.Inc.; Greenwood)
Oil Company, Inc.; G&M Building )
Supply; and the Osage County )
Treasurer, )
Defendants. )
ca~~ , laa.
FILED
JUG 3 1996
gHARON CA6EBOLT. Cou ~e~
sy
Case No. CJ-96-132
~- ,
E -~ ,
AMENDED PETITION
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation
(the "Plaintiff'), and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as
^ follows:
• 1. This action is instituted in the name of the State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department
of Transportation, as authorized by and in accordance with 69 Okla. Stat: 191 §1203.
r 2. For the purpose of establishing, constructing and maintaining the State
Transportation System in Osage- County, Oklahoma, it is necessary for the Plaintiff to
1
acquire an interest in the property hereinafter described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and made a part hereof, excluding mineral interests but including airspace and including
~ the right to use and remove any and all roadbuilding materials.. The acquisition shall be
in fee simple, unless specified otherwise in Exhibit "A" in which case the quality of title or
^
- interest to be acquired shall be as stated therein. The property is to be acquired for the
~ construction and/or maintenance of said State Transportation System or facilities
necessary and incidental thereto.
3. Said property is situated in Osage County, Oklahoma. The above named
defendants own or claim some interest in said .property.
4. Plaintiff further states and represents that it has made reasonable effort to
secure by purchase, from the said defendants, the property hereinafter described in Exhibit
"A", except in instances where there are nonresident owners, unknown heirs, imperfect
titles and owners whose whereabouts cannot be ascertained with reasonable diligence.
Plaintiff further asserts that the parties herein have failed to reach an agreement regarding
Plaintiffs acquisition of said property.
5. An affidavit of need and necessity to acquire said property is attached, marked
Exhibit "B", and made a part of this Petition.
6. Plaintiff further states that it is necessary for the State of Oklahoma to acquire
said title or interest and all equivalent rights, title or interest in and to the light, airspace
and view above -said property in order to accomplish the public purpose of constructing
and/or maintaining a public transportation system and related facilities. Acquisition of this
property- by Plaintiff excludes mineral interests. Said mineral interests may only be
explored as provided by law and in a manner not inconsistent with the use of said property
for public transportation service and other purposes incidental thereto.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff prays that the Court appoint three
disinterested freeholders of said County as Commissioners. They should be selected by
the Judge of the District Court, as prescribed by law, and should not be interested in any
.like question, The Commissioners should be instructed to inspect said property. described
in Exhibit "A" and to consider
and determine the dust compensation to which the said
' defendants as owners thereof, or those who profess an interest therein, are entitled by
reason of the taking of said property. The Report of Commissioners should be filed with .
the Court Clerk. Notice as prescribed by statute should be served by the Court Clerk upon
r. all parties.. Upon deposit with the Court Clerk of the amount stated in the Report of
' Commissioners, Plaintiff is authorized to enter upon and take said property for its use as
described. The final determination of all rights and issues of the parties should be made
in the manner as prescribed by law.
Respectfully submitted,
ii
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
BECKY D. McDOWN, OBA# 13138
Attorney for Plaintiff
200 N.E. 21sf Street
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105
(405) 521-2681
Leave granted to file this Amended Petition to correct the -legal description:
rf `~~ -`~
Date J e of the District Court
10851(02)
Parcels 85 & 85.1
06-27-96
Page 1 of 2
HIGHWAY EA.SBM~IT:
A strip, piece or parcel of land lying in part of the SE/4 NW/4 of
Section 22, T22N, R12E in Osage County, Oklahoma. Said parcel of
land being described by metes and bounds as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said SE/4 NW/4, thence westerly
along the south line of said SE%4 NW/4 a distance of 395.31 feet,
thence northerly along the East boundary of the•Amended Wah-Sha-She
Addition a> distance of 75.12 ::feet, ,hence::.N X88°56!.23 "E a distance of
391.8?'`~feet 'to .::.the East line ~ of said 'SE/4 NW/4, thence southerly
along.~.~°said'y~Easti 'line a distance of 75.00 feet to the Point of
Begi~nrii~ng.~
Containing 0.25 acres, more or less of new .right-of-way, the
remaining area included in the above description being 0.43 acres
of right-of-way occupied by the present highway.
All bearings contained in this description are based on the Oklahoma
P1ane.Coordinate.System and are not astronomical bearings.
Also: A perpetual easement for the purpose of. opening and
maintaining stream channel on the following described tract:
• S:
A strip.,... ,puce ~or parcel of land .3: in in.
Y .: 9; part of .the SE/4: NW/4
of. -Sec~~°on=?2~;,:`` T22N_ `R12E~ :in: OsageCounty.,. -Oklahoma. Said parcel. of
land-~'e~ig.~'described ~ by metes and bounds as ~ follows
Beginning .at a point on the permanent North right-of-way line of
State Highway No. 20 a distance of 251.65 feet westerly and '-75.00
feet northerly of the southeast 'corner of said SE/4 NW/4, thence S
88°56'23"W along said right-of-way'-line. a .distance of 50.08 feet;
thence N 02°'08'56"E a distance of. 266.88 feet to a point on the
Eastern =boundary of...ttie ~Aitt'ended` Wall-Stia=She ~~1ddi~tion ~to the' C•it of
Skiatook, .. thence.. easterly~`~albng~ s"aiS boundary a distance of 10.,0.0
feet.,...thence_ nor:therly...along ,said. boundary a distance of 723.35. feet,.
~.then.ce:.S .87°51!04"E a distance .of 40.OO.Feet, thenc S 02°.08'56"W a
distance of 987..43 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Conta~in`i=ng 0.97 acres, more • or less .
All bearings contained in this description are based on the Oklahoma
Plane Coordinate System and are not astronomical`bearings.
10851(02)
Parcel 85.2
06-27-96
Page 2 of 2
' Also: A temporary easement for the purpose of constructing a
detour on the following described-tract:
~ A strip, piece.: or parcel of land .lying in part of. the SE/4 NW/4 of
Section22,.'T22N;, Ri2E in .Osage: County, ~Ok-lahoma. Said~~parcel of land
being~~descrihed" by =metes ~an~d "bounds as follo~rs
Beginning at the point on the permanent North right-of-way line of
~•• State Highway No. 20 a. distance. of. 75.00 feet northerly of -the
southeast cornea of.said : SE/4 NW/~i., ~:: thence S; 88°56' 23"W along said
' right of-way ;lzr~e .a>.cli~tance~of~ :3'93.':87 `:-feet.,: ~thelce :: northerly along
the~-~~ast~:boundary of ~`the_~ Amended"Wah=Sha=She Addition a distance of
41.93- feet; thence N 88°56'23"E~a distance of 389.95 feet to
~ the East line of said SE/4 NW/4; thence southerly along said East
line a,distance of 41.86 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 0.38 acres, more or less.
" A11 .beatings;.~conta`ned :in this description. ar~_, based<:,on;.ahe Oklahoma
Plane~3oord~ate ~Sys~tem~ and are not .ast_ronomcal .~earings~.
This temporary easement will. automatically expire .at the
completion of construction upon this highway project.
..
1
i
i
10.851(02)
Parcel 88
06-27-96
HIGI3WAY BASEMENT;
A strip, piece or parcel of land lying in part of the NE/4 SW/4 of
Section 22, T22N, R12E in Osage County, O~kiahoma. Said parcel of
land being described by metes^and bounds.as`fol3ows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said NE/4 SW/4; thence aout~ierly
along said~~East line a~distance of 50:00 feet, thence S 88°56'23"W a
distance of •397.94 feet to the East rightrof-way line of=Locust
Street, thence northerly alonga_said.,East rightrof-way: line...a..distance .
..
of ~:50:A8~feet, ~~thence Yeasterly<~alnng~fit~Yie worth wine` of said ~ NE/4 SW/4
a d~~starice~:of.• 395.31. ~`feet~ to~'the~uPoint~ ~of= 'Beginn'ing.
Containing 0.15 acres, more or less of new right-of-way, the
rPma;n;nq area included~in the above description being 0.31 acres
of right-of-way occupied by the present highway.
All bearings contained in this description are based.on the Oklahoma
Plane Coordinate System and are not astronomical bearings:
.. .. :_ :. . ..- ~ ~: Page 1 of 2
- ~ - ~ • 1085.1(02)=
Parcel 89, 89 • I, 9G. a
Revised 5-31-96--
:IGHWA3C - EASEMEiQ'r:
,rip, piece~or parcel of land lying in part of Lot 2 of Section 22, T 22
R i2 E, in Osage County, Oklahoma. Said parcel of land being described
y fetes and .bounds. as follows:
nginning at the.. Southeast corner of said Lot 2, thence Westerly along the
w*'h line ~f• said-.L-ot• 2 a distance of 891.24 feet to the West line .of said
~t 2, .~t~ence~~Iortherly along; said .West line: a..disianceK-of; 75.00`''feet,
zeuce i~I ~g~°~~~x3~ ~ :a tae of ri83::E1. feet,' ~thence.~S~'~01°.0337" -E a
:.stance=of;.~~OD:~`~~et,. t~ence~-:~~8~°~6:`.23•`-~E a;_distance- •of 236~~4~0;:feet.,
ie ce~-South"-=a .distance of 18:36 ~feet.~'to .a ~oi.ht'•~onYthe present_~IZorth right-
-..ay line of State Highway I~Io. 20, thence East along said right-of-way
~e .a distance : of 100.. OO.,. feet, thence-; Plorth a distance . of 19.52 -feet,
~e oe~.DIitz88°,,,56~23~y,.~ a distance of 470.75 `feet- to a ~~point on the East line
~~ ~ ~d'~ot ~ ~"~ience~~ Saudi alongKsaid~-:East dine ~a distance of 60.00 feet to
Yiiti-of fsbeq;~nn~3i~x-~. • ~ ~ .
n~ pining
eluded in
0.39 acres, more or less of new right-of-way, the remaining area
the .above description being right-of-way occupied by the present
11 bees=ings~.contained in .this .descripton are based on 'the
.lane .O;aoiY33nat-c~~t~~r~n~ ~c~e ~o~~t~conomi
:: ... .~.~ , ,, ~a.3:.. bear-ings .
ys~~ A tempo=ary-easement for~the purpose of constructing
~adway and'. dTiveFray. on the following described tract:
:r.ip_, :.pi'ece ~-or ~ arcel f 1 -
Oklahoma State
a
. .p, o and. lying;; in part of Lot.2 of Section
2 ~ 1~~=1~I,~~ R1~2E~ inOsage County, Oklahoma. Said parcel of~ land being
Ascr.~~ie~~~~-:~o~.~lows :
inng:~ at-: a point on the permanent North right-of-way line. of
:~ H•ghwa~r.:No._ 20 a distance' of b0.00 .feet northerly of the
feast corner of said Lot~2,.thence S 88°56'23"W along said
of-way line a distance of 65.89 feet.,.thence N 00°34'43 "W a
inee of 57.86 '.feet, .thence N '88°96' 23 "E a distance of 65.89
tv' .a~ -point on the East line of said Lot 2, thence southerly
~~•said east line a distance. of 57.86 feet to the Point of
nines. -
fining 0.09 acres, more or less.
bearings contained in this description are based on the
,oma Plane Coordinate System and are not astronomical bearinQS.
temporary easement will automatically expire a~ the
Letion of construction upon this highway project.
Pale 2 of ?
10851(02)
Parcel 89.2
04-15-96
Also: A temporary easement for the purpose of constructing a
detour on the following described tract:
A strip, piece or parcel of land lyinc in part ~f Lot .2 of Se=ion
22, T22N, r._ZE.in Osage County, Oklahc-=. Said _~arcel of land oeing
described by metes and bounds as follc~-~:
Beginning at a po_::t on the permanent Nortr. right-of-way line of
State Highway No. 20 a distance of 75.00. feet northerly. of the
southwest corner of said Lot 2, thence N 88°56'23"E-along said right-
of-way line a distance of 83.81 feet, thence N 64°24'05"W a distance
of 93.30 feet. to the Wes t. line of said Lot 2, thence southerly along
said West line.~,a =distance of .41.86 feet to: the .Point of Beginning.
Containing 0.04 acres, more or less.
All bearings contained in this description are based on the Oklahoma
Plane Coordinate System and are not astronomical bearings.
This temporary easement will automatically expire at the
completion of construction upon this highway project.
w
^
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
STATE OF OKLAHOMA - )
ss.: "EXHIBIT B"
COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA )
MIKE BORELLI, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
That I am employed as Chief of the Right-of-Way Division by the Oklahoma Department
of Transportation, and as such, am in charge of the securing of all necessary realty
required in the construction and maintenance of the State Transportation System
designated by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation.
That at this time it is necessary to acquire the aforementioned interest(s) in the
tract(s) of land~as hereinbefore described, in order to economically construct and maintain
a section of the State Transportation System, and facilities incidental thereto.
That the Transportation Commission has determined that a public necessity exists
for such acquisition of the property legally described in the sheet attached hereto; that
representatives of the Department of Transportation have- been unable to effect a
reasonable and amicable settlement with the property owrer-s except in instances where
there are nonresident owners, unknown heirs, imperfect titles and owners whose
whereabouts cannot be ascertained with reasonable diligence.
-O-~c
MIKE BORELLI
SU SCRIBED AND SWORN .TO before me by the above named on this 13~J-~
day of ~. , ~ gg G
'ri l c U:= GKLAF~C\~,1 ~ S5,
a~,UiJTY OF OSAGE
• SHARON CASEBOLT, COURT CLERK, In a r.•
. ._2ae County, Oiclr:h^ma, d~ hereby certif a
,:~,~,va and icreaeirp is a true, correct ~a omo -
w , of the or:;a~nal now on`i1e in rh~r~~ :i MOOre, Notary Public
My Commission ~~cp,U~,s,: Oklahoma, as the same appears of record.
April 16, 1999 yitness my hand and otficlal seal this ~' .
_ - cf - 19~`'
SH" ~ CAS OLT, COU T CLE.r~K
n•.
r
+1
1N THE DISTRICT COURT OF OSAGE COUNTY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Plaintiff,
OSAGE RAILROAD CO., A SUBSIDIARY
OF SOUTHEAST Y.ANSAS Rr'~ILRvAD;
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD A.K.A.
MOPAC; CITY OF OWASSO; CITY OF
SKIATOOK; CRAW FEED & FARM
SUPPLY,
Defendants.
ii ,lti ~ Fw ~ -~ ~ 1y~6 .i~
swan;rar.::s~r.~.....~...-~.,..-~...w..
No. CJ-9G-132
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE, EXCEPTION TO REPORT OF COMidIISSIONER5
AND DEMAND FOR JURY
The Town of Skiatook, one of the defendants in the above styled proceeding, no~v takes
exception to the Report of the Commissioners filed in this case on July 22, 1996, and demands
trial by jury of all issues presented.
Dated this 31st day of July, 1996.
i
i
i
Jay C. Baker
O.B.A. No. 0448
Attorney for the Defendant,
The Town of Skiatook
222 West Eighth Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119-1404
(918) 587-1168
r
~..
Certificate of ~$'ervice
I certify that on the 31st day of July, 1996, I mailed a copy of this document to the fallowing
individuals, postage fully prepaid:
Osage Railroad Company
Charles Webb, President
315 W. 3rd Street
Pittsburg, Kansas 66762
Missouri Pacific Railroad a/k/a Mopac
Ron Bums, President
-1416: Dodge. Street, .Room ] 100
Omaha, NE 68179
City of Owasso
Charles L. Burris, Mayor
207 S. Cedar
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055-0180
City of Skiatook
Don Branscum, Mayor
110 N. Broadway
P.O. Box 399
Skiatook, OK 74070-0399
Crain Feed & Farm Supply Company
Lee Crain
200 N. Osage
Skiatook,, OK 74070
Skiatook Greenhouse
Wade Neil ,
200 N. Osage ~
Skiatook, OK 74070
G&R Trucking Inc.
Glen Davenport
101 E. Kogers Blvd.
Skiatook, OK 74070
Osage Railroad Company
C1~arles Webb, President
3 i 5 West'3rd~
Pittsburg, KS 66762
Greenwood Oil Company, Inc.
Ron Greenwood, President
P.O. Box 309
Skiatook, OK 74070
G&M Building Supply
Virgil Gardner, General Partner
310 West Rogers
Skiatook, OK 74070
Joyce Hathcoat, Treasurer
Courthouse
Pawhuska, OK 74056
Jay C. Ilaker
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OSACE • COUNTY, STATE OF Oi:LAIIOtIA.
~= ~ STATE OF OKLAHOMA' EX REL
DFPARTf~IF'NT nF TRATV.SA'1RTATTnN )
=~,`~ - PLAINTIFF, )
-;,~ ) .
,: ~; ~ ~
:~ ;
'~>.tr " OSAGE RAILROAD CO. , A SUBSIDIARY OF • ) N0. CST-96-13~ ._,_.-.-
SOUTHEAST KANSAS RAILROAD; MISSOURI )
' PACIFIC RAILROAD AKA MOPAC; CITY OF )
_ OWASSO; CITY OF SKIATOOK; ~RAIN,FEED )
& FARM SUPPLY CO.; SKIATOOK GREENHOUSE;
~~~~ G&R TRC~CKING INC.: GREENWOOD OIL CO.
~»~'~ G&M BLDG SUPPLY & OSAGENOTICE IN COiJDEPII9ATI0N PROCEEDING •
:~f: CO. TREASURER ,
~~~
~' ~ ****** SEE ATTACHED LIST*****
You will take notice that court-appointed commissioners (appraisers)
filed in this case their report on JULY 22 , 19~ 6 A copy of this
ou have an interest, is attached to
h
hi
i
y
c
n w
report, as it pertains to the tract
this notice.
If you wish to present a legal challenge to the attached report or con-
-
test the condemnor's right to take, you or your lawyer must file a written excep
thirty (30) days after
th
an
tion to it in this office at the courthouse not later
Should you desire a fury trial on the
d
fil
.
e
the date the attached report was
amount of damages to be awarded, you or your lawyer must file a written demand for
"~
it in this office at the courthouse not later than sixty (60) days after the date ~1
the attached report was filed.
You are advised that in computing the time limits for filing the papers
b
e
mentioned in this notice the date the couunissioners' report was filed is to
excluded and the last day of the prescribed period included.
o file an exce tion to the attached report yr a demand
If you fail t P
that is
for fury trial within. the time limits given in this notice, your .property
ted in
st
a
sought to be taken in this case may pass to the condemnor for the amount
the attached commissioners' report. ~ '
PAWHUSKA, OK. 7/22/96 •P
(name of town and date of notice) ~'
II
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OSAGE COUNTY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1a
State of Oklahoma, ex rel.
~ Department of Transportation,
ii
ii
Defendants.
{1-su~~• _-- -FILED
JUL 2 2 1996
SHAKO A B T, CoupePe~ ~,
By .
Case No. C }' a ~ ~ (3 a-
REPORT OF COMMISSIONERS
COME NOW the undersigned Commissioners appointed by the Judge of this Court
w
to inspect the property described in Exhibit "A" and to determine the amount of just
r
~' compensation due the defendants by reason of the taking of the property. Said taking is
vs.
Plaintiff,
Osage Railroad Company, a Subsidiary of
Southeast Kansas Railroad; Missouri Pacific
Railroad aka MoPac; City of Owasso; City of
Skiatook; Crain Feed and Farm Supply
Company; Skiatook Greenhouse; G & R
Trucking Inc.; Greenwood Oil Company, Inc.;
G & M Building Supply; and the Osage County
Treasurer,
in fee simple, unless specified otherwise in Exhibit "A" in which case the quality of title or
interest to be acquired shall be as stated in Exhibit "A", including airspace but excluding
-' mineral interests and including the right to use and remove any and all roadbuilding
materials. The appropriation is for public purposes by the Department of Transportation
W
of the State of Oklahoma. We, the undersigned, respectfully submit the following Report,
to-wit:
The undersigned Commissioners were and are disinterested freeholders of Osage
rested in an like uestion. On the ~ day of
County, Oklahoma. We are not ante y q
199, we took the oath prescribed by law, and proceeded to
inspect the property described in Exhibit "A".
We further report that we have considered and determined the just compensation f
to which the defendants are entitled by reason of the taking of the property by the Plaintiff.
We have considered the value of the property or rights or interest therein taken excluding
' 't "A". We do hereb assess the just ~~
any mineral interest other than as is set forth in Exhibi Y
compensation due said defendants by reason of the taking of the property and in
accordance with the Instructions to Commissioners, we find:
~23~ Z~~ '
Before Value of entire property ~~
LESS
After Value of remaining property ~ 5 Z~ ? ~~
'/ ~~ ; ~
ESTIMATE OF JUST COMPENSATION $ ~`~
IN ITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands on this ~ 1~ day of ~
,199tO.
COMMISSIONERS: +~
~~ L~-~.