HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995.10.17_City Council AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
~ TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
' ~ DATE: October 17, 1995
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
~ PLACE: Council Chambers, Owasso Community Center
Notice and Agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin
board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, October 13, 1995.
i
Marci Boutwell, City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
Councilor Joe Ramey
3. Flag Salute
4. Roll Call
5. Presentation to Council Relating to Youth Programs.
Chief Alexander
Chief Alexander will introduce Owasso High School VICA students who will brief the
Council on an upcoming panel dealing with youth-related concerns.
Owasso City Council
October 17, 1995
Page 2
6. Reading of Mayor's Proclamation.
Mayor Burris
Attachment #6
The Mayor will present a proclamation to members of the Owasso High School Girls
Softball Team in recognition of their achievements.
7. Request Approval of the Minutes of October 3, 1995 Regular Meeting and October 2, 1995
Special Meetings.
Attachment #7
8. Request Approval of Claims.
Attachment #8
9. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to Resolution #95-12, a Resolution of Intent
Assuring the Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, that the City of Owasso
will Accept Beneficial Interest In and To the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority Upon
Amendment of Its Trust Indenture Establishing the City of Owasso as an Expressed
Beneficiary of the Trust.
Mr Ray
Mr Cates
Attachment #9
The staff will report to the Council the intent and impact of the Resolution and recommend
Council adoption of Resolution #95-12.
Owasso City Council
' October 17, 1995
Page 3
10. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request to Ratify an Action of the City
Manager Wherein Approval of Payment of a Claim was Authorized Pursuant to Previous
Council Action.
Mr Ray
Attachment # 10
The staff will recommend Council ratification of the City Manager's authorization for the
payment of $20,598.54 to Classic Chevrolet for purchase of a vehicle, such purchase
' approved by the Council on September 19, 1995.
1
' 11. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to Council Approval of the Expenditure of
Funds for the Purchase of General Liability Insurance.
' Ms Parsons
Attachment # 11
* Staff will recommend Council approval of the expenditure of $56,072.69 to Oklahoma
Municipal Assurance Group, Oklahoma City, OK, for the purchase of a one year general
liability insurance policy.
' 12. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for Amendments to the FY
1995-96 General Fund, Revenue Bond Project Fund, and Capital Improvements Fund
Budgets.
' Ms Bishop
Attachment # 12
t Staff will recommend Council approval of "carry over" budgets in the form of supplemental
appropriations for the Engineering, Cemetery, Parks, Community Development, Fire, and
Finance Departments of the General Fund, and in the Revenue Bond Project Fund, and
' Capital Improvements Fund.
~
Owasso City Council
October 17, 1995
Page 4
13. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to Ordinance #515, an Ordinance Providing
for the Rezoning of a 356 Acre located East of North 129th East Avenue, South of East '~"
86th Street North, West of North 145th East Avenue, and North of East 76th Street North.
Mr Rooney
Attachment # 13
Staff will recommend Council approval of Ordinance #515 based on previous Council action
of October 3, 1995 approving such zoning.
14. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to OZ-95-07, a Request to Rezone a Tract „~
of Land from AG (Agriculture) to CS (Commercial Shopping Center), Such Property
Located East of the Southeast Corner of East 86th Street North and North 129th East
Avenue, Containing 16.9 Acres, More or Less.
Mr Rooney ~
Attachment # 14
Staff will recommend Council approval of the zoning request as recommended by the
Owasso Planning Commission.
15. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for the Expenditure of Funds
for the Purpose of Abating a Nuisance.
Mr Rooney
Mr McCord
Attachment # 15
The staff will recommend Council approval of the expenditure of $1400 to Tom Gill Tree
Service, Tulsa, OK for the purpose of removing a tree that has been declared a nuisance.
Owasso City Council
t October 17, 1995
Page 5
' 16. Report from City Manager
17. Report from City Attorney
18. Reports from City Councilors
i~
i~
i~
PROCLAMATION
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
WHEREAS, As SA State Champions, the 1995 Owasso High School Girls Softball Team
has reached a pinnacle reserved for only a few; and,
WHEREAS, The team is the first girls softball team in the history of Owasso High School
to win the state championship, and only the second to reach the playoffs; and,
WHEREAS, The ability of the team to reach the state playoffs comes through dedication,
commitment and hours of hard work by a total team effort; and,
WHEREAS, The athletic record of the team is matched by the excellent academic record of
the individuals on that team; and,
WHEREAS, The team and coaching staff have brought credit to their school, their families,
their community, and themselves by their actions on and off the field with both
team and individual effort,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Charles L Burris, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor
of the City of Owasso, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, October 18, 1995 as
OWASSO HIGH SCHOOL
LADY RAMS SOFTBALL DAY
I
in the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, and do further encourage all Owasso residents and businesses
to express their thanks and congratulations to Coaches Oliver, Hightower and Clazk and the
entire team on that day for this memorable achievement.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of
Owasso to be affixed this 17th day of October, 1995.
Chazles L Burris, Mayor
' OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
' TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1995
The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, October 3, 1995 in the Council
' Chambers at the Owasso Community Center per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda
posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, September 29, 1995.
ITEM l: CALL TO ORDER
' Mayor Burris called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m.
ITEM 2: INVOCATION
The invocation was given during the OPWA meeting preceding this meeting.
ITEM 3: FLAG SALUTE
The flag salute was held during the OPWA meeting preceding this meeting.
ITEM 4: ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Charles Burris, Mayor
Danny Ewing, Vice Mayor
Mary Lou Barnhouse, Councilor
Joe Ramey, Councilor
~ Michael Helm, Councilor
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
~ Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
Ronald D Cates, City Attorney
A quorum was declared present.
' ITEM 5: READING OF MAYOR'S PROCLAMATIONS.
Mayor Burris presented a proclamation to Mr Tim Rich, owner of Owasso McDonald's,
proclaiming that business as Business of the Quarter for the Fourth Quarter of 1995.
He also presented a proclamation to the Owasso Business and Professional Women's Club
proclaiming October 15-21 as National Business and Professional Women's Week in the City
of Owasso.
Owasso City Council October 3, 1995
ITEM 6: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19 1995
REGULAR MEETING AND SEPTEMBER 28 1995 SPECIAL MEETING.
Mr Helm moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to approve the minutes as submitted, by reference
made a part hereto.
AYE: Helm, Barnhouse, Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 7: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE CLAIMS
Mr Ramey moved, seconded by Mr Ewing, that the following claims be approved: (1) General
Fund $28,385.48; (2) Ambulance Service Fund $1,280.43; (3) E-911 $1,844.19; (4) City Garage
$2,671.40; (5) Capital Projects Grant $2,341.99; (6) Interfund Transfers $25,887.50;
(7) General Fund Payroll $105, 418.60; (8) City Garage Payroll $1, 982.24.
AYE: Ramey, Ewing, Helm, Barnhouse, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Burris recessed the meeting at 7:47 p.m. and reconvened at 7:58 p.m.
ITEM 8: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO OZ-95-OS
A REQUEST TO REZONE A 356 ACRE TRACT OF LAND FROM AG
(AGRICULTUREI TO CS (COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERI OL
(OFFICE LIGHTI. RD (RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX) RS_3 (RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY HIGH DENSITY) RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
MEDIUM DENSITY), AND RE (RESIDENTIAL ESTATESI SUCH
PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF NORTH 129TH EAST AVENUE SOUTH
OF EAST 86TH STREET NORTH, WEST OF NORTH 145TH EAST
AVENUE, AND NORTH OF EAST 76TH STREET NORTH
This is an item that was originally scheduled for hearing on June 21, 1995, and was postponed
on that occasion and two subsequent occasions. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company has requested
rezoning a 344 acre tract from AG to CS, OL, RD, RS-3, RS-2, and RE. The portion of the
tract that originally contained a request for RM-1 zoning has been removed from this request.
Mr Charles Norman presented the request on behalf of the applicant. A large group of citizens
was in attendance, many to protest the proposed duplex zoning. The area to be zoned for
2
' Owasso City Council October 3, 1995
duplexes is located directly south of a 16-acre tract located at the southeast corner of 129th E
Ave and 86th St N. The. duplexes would act as a buffer between the commercial zoning and the
residential zoning to the south and east. Citizens speaking against the duplex zoning were Mike
Anderson, Sid Eckerd, Linda Younger, Glenda Payne, Sue Higbee-Olsen, and Claire McKinley.
They were basically protesting multi-family housing being placed close to schools. They were
concerned about increased traffic and the safety of their children. Two citizens, Dale Prevett
and Steve Compton, spoke in favor of the proposed zoning, citing the need for duplex housing
in Owasso and compatibility with the city's comprehensive plan. City Planner Tim Rooney
outlined the staff recommendations. Following discussion and rebuttal statements from citizens
and the applicant, Mr Ramey moved to approve the rezoning request from Kaiser-Francis Oil
Company to rezone the subject property from AG to CS on Tract A, OL on Tracts C & G, RD
on Tract D, RS-3 on Tract E, RS-2 on Tract F, and RE on Tract I. Motion seconded by
Ms Barnhouse.
AYE: Ramey, Barnhouse, Helm, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Burris recessed the meeting at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened at 9:35 p.m.
ITEM 9: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO ESTABLISH A STREET REPAIR
PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE 1995-96
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN.
The Public Works Department staff has compiled information pertaining to needed street repairs
in response to the establishment of funding in the FY95-96 Capital Improvements budget. Mr
Carr presented a summary of the projects evaluated. The following projects were recommended
as priority projects: Street Overlay Projects -Dogwood St (19th St to 20th Ct), 76th St &
Atlanta Intersection, 107th E Ave & 96th Pl, 10800E 99th St N, 121st Ct (South of 90th St N),
125th E Ave (82nd St to 83rd St), and 81st St (Owasso Expy to end); Miscellaneous Repairs -
8208 N 128th E Ave, 10703E 97th Pl, 2202 N Dogwood, 10707E 99th Pl, 121st E Ave &
89th St Intersection, 90th St & 121st E Ave Intersection, 108E 21st St, 9911E 107th St, 11809
E 80th Pl, 320 N Dogwood, and 10703E 98th St. Mr Helm moved, seconded by Mr Ramey,
to authorize staff to proceed with the street repair project as outlined and recommended by staff.
AYE: Helm, Ramey, Barnhouse, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
3
Owasso City Council
October 3, 1995
ITEM 10: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OF A LAWSUIT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
OWASSO AND SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF SUCH SETTLEMENT
Safety National Casualty Corporation provided excess workers compensation coverage for the
City of Owasso beginning July 1, 1991. That annual premium was $27,400. The City of
Owasso was notified that there would be no significant change to the premium for 1992-93,
however, when the premium notice was receive it was for $41,100. At that time the City
solicited quotes from other providers for excess workers compensation coverage. The contract
with Safety National was terminated an October 26, 1992, but no premium was paid them after
July 1, 1992. Safety National sued to recover premiums in the amount of $17, 621 for the four
month period and $10,757 due from "audited payroll", plus legal fees. A tentative settlement
agreement was reached on August 31, 1995 in the amount of $16,000 for a dismissal with
prejudice and a full release of the City of Owasso, as well as past, present and future officials,
officers and agents. Mr Ewing moved, seconded by Mr Helm, to approve a payment in the
amount of $16,000 to Safety National Casualty Corporation to satisfy Case No CJ 94 02809, and
that a release of liability be obtained by the City Attorney in exchange for such settlement.
AYE: Ewing, Helm, Barnhouse, Ramey, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 11: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO THE WORKERS
COMPENSATION SELF INSURANCE FUND.
Approval of the payment to Safety National Casualty Corporation requires a budget amendment
to increase expenses in the amount of the settlement. Mr Ramey moved, seconded by Mr Helm,
to approve a Workers Compensation Self Insurance Fund budget amendment to increase
expenses by $16,000.
AYE: Ramey, Helm, Barnhouse, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
4
Owasso City Council
October 3, 1995
ITEM 12: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO
RESOLUTION #95-11. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DIRECT DEPOSIT
OF MONTHLY RETIREMENT BENEFITS BY THE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
OF THE OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND.
The OMRF recently approved allowing a retiree to request that their monthly pension benefit
be directly deposited into their bank account. Before the City of Owasso can offer this benefit
to retirees, the City Council must ratify the process by resolution, and approve the plan
authorization for direct deposit. Mr Helm moved, seconded by Mr Ramey, to approve
Resolution #95-11, authorizing direct deposit of monthly retirement benefits.
AYE: Helm, Ramey, Barnhouse, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
' ITEM 13: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY 1995-96 CAPITAL
PROJECTS GRANT FUND (PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO AS THE
' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT).
Since the approval of the fiscal year budget, two additional grants have been approved for capital
improvement projects. Those grants need to be added to both income and expenditures in the
budget. In addition, all grants will be included in a single fund entitled "Capital Projects Grant
Fund" . Mr Helm moved, seconded by Mr Ewing, to approve a supplemental budget amendment
to the Capital Projects Grant Fund for revenues and expenditures of $525,239.
AYE: Helm, Ewing, Barnhouse, Ramey, Burris
NAY: None
~ Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 14: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
~ REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET
WHEREIN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES RELATING TO A HIGHWAY
SAFETY GRANT WILL BE REDUCED.
^ The FY 1995-96 General Fund budget included an anticipated Highway Safety Grant to fund a
community service officer in the Police Department. The Highway Traffic Safety Department
has withdrawn funding for that program, and the anticipated revenues and expenditures in the
amount of $35,229 need to be eliminated from the City's budget. Ms Barnhouse moved,
Owasso City Council October 3, 1995
seconded by Mr Helm, to approve an amendment to the General Fund budget reducing grant
revenues by $35,229 and reducing the Police Department expenditures by $35,229.
AYE: Barnhouse, Helm, Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 15: REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER ,r
Mr Ray reported that Governor Keating has appointed Mayor Burris to the Police Pension
Board. He also said that Mr Burris and Mr Ewing have been working with other Tulsa County
mayors in setting up the Criminal Justice Authority.
ITEM 16: REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY
No report. '~
ITEM 17: REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCILORS
No report.
ITEM 18: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None. ~
ITEM 19: NEW BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 20: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DISCUSSING PERSONNEL MATTERS RELATING TO THE OFFICE OF
THE CITY MANAGER. SUCH EXECUTIVE SESSION PROVIDED FOR IN
O.S. 25. SECTION 307(B)(1).
Staff recommended Council action to retire into executive session for the purpose of discussing
personnel matters relating to the office of the City Manager. Mr Ramey moved, seconded by
Mr Helm, to retire to executive session for the stated purpose.
6 f
t
Owasso City Council October 3, 1995
~ AYE: Ramey, Helm, Barnhouse, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0, and the Council retired to executive session at 9:50 p.m.
Ms Barnhouse out at 9:50 p.m.
Meeting reconvened at 10:10 p.m.
ITEM 21: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
~ CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF OWASSO AND
w. RODNEY J RAY.
°' Mr Helm moved, seconded by Mr Ramey, to approve an employment agreement with City
Manager Rodney J Ray as discussed under the previous agenda item, such agreement to
terminate on June 30, 1996.
AYE: Helm, Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 4-0.
ITEM 22: ADJOURNMENT
a
Ms Ramey moved, seconded by Mr Ewing, to adjourn.
AYE: Ramey, Ewing, Helm, Burris
~~ NAY: None
Motion carried 4-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 10:12 p.m.
i~
Charles L Burris, Mayor
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
7
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1995
The Owasso City Council met in special session on Monday, October 2, 1995 as part of the ,
Tulsa Business Forum. The session consisted of traveling from Owasso to Tulsa to attend the
Business Forum at 4:30 p.m., and the return trip to Owasso. No city business was conducted.
r
~.
.~
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1995
The Owasso City Council met in special session on Monday, October 2, 1995 in the Lower
Level Conference Room at Owasso City Hall, 207 S Cedar, per the Notice of Public Meeting
and Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, September 29, 1995.
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Burris called the meeting to order at 6:38 p.m.
ITEM 2: ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Charles Burris, Mayor
Danny Ewing, Vice Mayor
Joe Ramey, Councilor
Mary Lou Barnhouse, Councilor
Michael Helm, Councilor
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
A quorum was declared present.
ITEM 3: DISCUSSION OF ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE TO THE CITY OF OWASSO.
A general discussion of issues of importance to the City of Owasso took place. No action was
requested and no vote taken.
ITEM 4: ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Burris moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse to adjourn.
AYE: Burris, Barnhouse, Helm, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
Charles L Burris, Mayor
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
t
~~
1, i":TTY;' t_?^ Cl(~dA '=,~?
toft.,~~.~ -~~.~;-•~.. ~.;F r..~,Tr:*:. R-F't: ~ a~~r~ r'.i,=.
Ff) ii ~'FPd?'~LIT? ;'iT='=;i :!=?TFTTt'ii~r Ah1^~?`~T
---------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -- -------------
MAAIAr.,ERT.AIs
F' ---------- --------------------
~ 9~ft(14'~ GEI,t.UL.AR IJHr-TTTL~A RTaC1t~IE ?TAE-RAY q?,.
96n6?R ~1Mi., ~.P~ptFErEt~rF RF~;=I~TRATT~'?T? ~tn.cto
r g.-n?~5 r;TT`~ GAR~4~:,E F'~.RTF; 9,~4'S ti..n
g6n?t6 Gtl PYSTFM~ FTl_F..LiT?TE'~EL. 9/x+5 ?:1.9~
`~6T?~3(1 TRF.AS?TREK FBTTY CASH REitiR PETTY CASH '4,56
~6rtP?n TRFAS??RER PETTY C:AFH RP.TP7F FTTET.-Ti~Rr~Tpt ~'f!_i?it
~64R.~Q TF.EAS?TREK PETTY ~!=A'~u R~'Tt*tF PFTT`r' GA'~H `-~1r
~- 96~R4? REASCtR~ PRTGE RTTF F Tt,M T)EVT;L.nPTPIG ?t , rtl
~` IiEPARTMEt~T TCITAL =___. 4,~~,0 ~~
FIPTAHGE
------------------------------
9606?~ (}pAi.. !:~!pdFERFp•t:E RF~Tt;TRA T TF+AI ,°i C;,CIi'1
96(ig^, t1 TRE.AP?TREK PFTT`r' ~:AtiT~? RF.Th1F; F~T?T'"`~' C'.,~~=*i 1'-~.t)ft
i)EPARTM.F..P,T T~1TA?: ____ ~~••.~?,r1(7
t'??MMt?p~TTY ItF41FLt~Fi~lFLIT
------------------------------
?:50116 TTTLSA C~?TpdT4' P1T
y6.1715 C'TT`r' ARA~E:
yr`,,t??4Et t?I,TAGS~? TTRE I'ARpI
g,n83~~ TREAS?TREK PETTY r.a~=:N
9rOR?Ct TRF,AS?TE?ER PETTY' 1=ASH
T}FPARTi~1Ep?T T[1TAI:
MT?~I('TPA.?. CfiT..TRT
------------------------------
jiTAI,-TTP :~FRUT~E
FTIEL~1"rTFFF.?, S,"~`
T~FP 's'RH.T~:T,F, TTRES
RETPiB F?.A';:.TTNG ~I~RI!'=;T~t1P
a~SCt(141. CI?ARt.FS RAP1^EY RT=..TPTpiER
46(1(14? MTCHbEJ, 1'i, T-tTl..~kPFC'T{ RFTATATF.R
?6ft6^!1 G~KI~A ?ditptTCTFA? ?,E At=?TE ~tN;T.,'p1T;!=;r rC?TdFEREP?CE
9.=.tt?56 DO?TER PRT1`;T?p;!; ~T?TrtTFT~ ~'nkt~P
i~
r;1=PaT="'t*tE1~T T4~TA?.,
F.ri ? p?T? F. F' T P
------------------------------
4n,nn
y,°,'~}~
?(to,~~
t. ~~{~5
tQ5_tltl
"'~_i1Ci
-S,Cirt
%_,~,?fi
1 a:T:_~'t
1CI,'t,=',~~~ ~~^?•?;~ ::fP -~r ~7,;~r L;CF.~nT ~nx~,nn =,,":~,.•
F~! # trFtdnn>? r?~^C~'TpTTfltd ~?;,,~?•?~T
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
^,~()?1 ~, C;fl fi't~~TET~i~, FtTF.t..~r?TEcpt '~!°S ~4 _ fs-,
9,(-R~(1 TRF4.^_,tIREFt pFTTY [:P^H RFTt4E AFGiA C:(11'tFFR~'i~r.-~F 5!),f,~
I',EEA1?T~iE1dT T11TAI: ____? 9a.nL,
GFl'tFR~T., C;'!l~I>sEpME`1dT
------------------------------
Qr;iTf1C?4 R~?t~ALL~ L? f'ATFS FFTATNFR %CIfM,t1f!
y~nni,~ ~nA3ai:1? D raTT=~ ~=,F~vlc'F~ ° , ,-?..=r~
~:~i?3,t~ ~t
n
TnFnLA
,
rN~:, HAPTL? Hr'T.I? PAr?T?~~= ^41?`,i?n
~}h fi r"t ~'+3 L
+
r
T
~+ n
~+.ET!~~.~F~1~L~ ~tt~T.: ~i.•.~#T 7l!A.'=} T.:~r7 ~?f.., tgi1TT1_.F~, '~c'= n~
T:~(1?1.5 CITY tdEAC;F L'A?Z~Ti= ;%9g ~« ~,L,
`~~Q~'~f ['?Cl °`{STE~'.j FT?F'? i?lTj=r~Ei q/qc .~,.~ _•-
`~ni)?49 DO~IEF P'RTtdTIi~~~ F'R??€TTt~t; ?9_.i,~,
~,p(a4 F)C1?TFR PfiTP7T?Art; T,FTTFRHEAL? 1'?~.pt7
4t,t11h ^-,p.N'S CLtiF; MT~r StTfiP?.TE'; ,«
.,..
~,=r1~9 ~ ~;~Pd'r; C',[.tTP C.%?F'~' PAp~.r"'fiFF'TC'>= ~;tIPPI T~
~.. ~h'~-, '~:
r
9,~,Ci~?4 TR$A~=riR1=L? FETT`,' i'.A~<N FiRTt4R T?i:~C' Mnbl.~~ 't~~_E„~,
'_~,,()~^(! TF+FyI=;tTRE~ FFTTY t'~,:H ~~t~±'~ T=IENBFR'=HTP :J=,n(1
9r;p~.~ ~iTE'F~ ~:ORP ('fiPTRt? M~TP:'TEtdAPd;E ?ftfl,OQ
I?FFA.~TP1E7`-T,T Tf7TkI_. ____~ ~,=,r,l_~t?
------------------------------
i
9r.f?~ft' ~`.=TF~ T?i{' FANT:= '~:T~tL'1dT^9? ~ co =,,_, °
9r;,T7:'15 s.,TT't' tAF1ACiE PA.RT~ 9,~'r,~ :??;,i° a.
i,~,J?1 L t;n ~t%~TE~'",~ F?rrI..~riTr,_~L'T, n,.OS ~~:..'~,:i
°Ci~t~? ~',Tt*1BA?..L. A+=E IiAFntalaNr=, rRAT~TFr~At?t~:E StT?PI..IFI= ?1 , ~ % ~r
4E,nting ~P1.-t*1.AF'T MATt~T ~t?PPL.TE=; ~~~7
?.LCtfi1 ~ ~Ahi"fi t;t,EI~ ,TAN7Tf1RTAT: ~tTPEz.TF~ 1 f?9,f,ti
13Efi_ARTMFPIT T[iT~~., ____~: 5T?_~~
CF'~tFTF..R<<'
------------------------------
a,iC1~4'.~ ~''°s MPP.L1..: ?.CE N~Rr~bIA~-rc I~SA. TTIT~.ta,~ktC:F c;tT:',~F'I: TL c f . G,;
`='r,i,?1~ CITY ~:kR~i;F P~,RT~ 9J4~ ?",31
4.~ti"1 Sri ~;Y^TE1'i'= FtiF,I::r,rr,-_:t n "~c .-mac •7•~•
I?F.P~F'TtriFT?T T,']TAt, ____ 15>^,,~}Q
------------------------------
r=F??i?R Ki. r11dT'i
I ?11l j.~,'4c ~.~~n. n`{ j ire ~^* yTtj'= ~F>-'r'D^' ~?v;,C = L~~~.i..
~ ~n #
---------- v ~. ~Tr,,r, ~,
------------------------- ~,T= ~;;~. ~ -, ~: T ; i 11`d
--------------------- .~. r~tflT T1T
---- -------------
Qf~~?P THREE LAKFS I:hirxr>?'v T.rrrTrnurt ri.F1dT1d~ =; r1~:t_'~Ct
9~tl0?~ THREE t.AilE~ L::~????C?R`r' IT1dTFnPM Ci,-a,~dr*dr; r~,rtn
!" 4,~nnn rF1_.I.,[ri.aR n*?F-TiiT.=;, Pun1dE it^i=-ki.;. :~~a,'1
~. ~E,on?~ WAI.,-AiART :=jiPPLTES ~?. ~?
gbnn:~ I,.E.T.A;R :=[TR~[':?7PT?~.t? ,%'H°~~0
+' '~rC)4?7 RTT.;,'S r:QMh;?T};i[:t~TT~f?d~., ?'rd Fca1iTF'69EtaT P'=pATR `5,~'lst
9n{1~~t5 FARRS f'yf:T_F.S hit,Titr~~"7t~I_,F' vi~!gG ~;.`p'?.[lt~
9f, l7?1 ` f:TTY ~A.F?At=F PART= ~:'a` t n l.~ . ~;1
.
'~.5tt;'1t5 ir} ~:`t~TEMS FI)FT,,'rtTi=Pr.I: '~,%95 '', =+.~7f~
~
^, .S(i?1,° ~IT$URRAP? !=VpFTt_:.` x,11°~I v rFFjf"=. ~?TFP'.TF_ P: ~l'. t:-'
~ 9r, C1?~? T.YNN pF,_..t,VE4• f'~l, cTTPPI,TFt a:?,rc
9,~(1?a'~ [1P?`lX r...nRPC~RATTn~r ~t?TP?TfiA t; p,F±TA?Li~i= ? `•'9. ~(I
t.5:"!?44 ??~ F'C?LTht.P~:TFR Pi7~;Tat~F. 4r _ t;f~
~,. '?,;ft~1S .^_,AP4'~ C'I.:?TB ,TA1~;'T~tRTAL. F~?irPI.TF: ~ti1,~:1
9,~(t$1~~ SAii'c C:I.,ITR ~=.(`P`? F'ApFR 9?','~4
®. 9,gp~t1." r.Q?rTHER?? P:[;?~Tt'tT;.,TT,iRE F'~t?L?!'tdl~~F{ ?` :''_'
4ztl~.'1
T~IpRTl ('i..z=~,1FI,.A'~;?' 7~*T
L. T i f_11`~
F?~?MR 1r11~1i~11j~' ~-~ C ~ ~'t iii
?n[)fi'? NAP?F'~ $H~)~ '? AR~:i~ :~Nr?P pPT^r1dFR F~iri`+ ~,Ri.T~; =.4 , QCi
4r;1~s?:=t A,T~T PAt=;FR.~L;A13; :: ~'=FTnF.t=' 1,'~ 9~
•~t,q~^4 BTI.~I:S {'tltdl~tlTP?T~ATI(lp?~ F?A?',T~'1 FFL,~.-T~, G~_~~
L?EPA.RThf£1.dT TrT a.i. _ _ _ _ .i .~ _ ~ ~ ; _ t; ~,
F???:T~:F, t:,r1~1F,q?rP?7[:ATr~'!Ar~;
------------------------------
=,~:nn~~ DEPT nF F??pI,?~: :~AFFT" r~i._ET° RF.i?T ^~o,nn
9,~t1(t'~? Id~I.-{~GRT ~?TPPI,TFp L,$.51
i?FPAr?T1rr?T T(?TA?, _ _ _ _ ~'~ • ~?
A?dT~TAi~ ~~1P?TR!?I.
------------------------------
9nt7"1t, ~;il '=~'t:=;TE?~'= Fi?~i.frlTfi'=;?=`, q;::~~ ?3.4~(}
Y,~Ct~??Q TRTi_4A i_-'=b1T~. A~~T~T l;~!r~~f1~:-; r~?P =?i?_!:i~!
T)FPARTMF.??T T(?Tni_ ____~~ `~+_~ft
------------------------------
y,~,~71 ~? Iic, TT=T e :pe,.F ?1d':. ]?$r:L'1,' I;,~F «`
G,~.n:?a7 t:EI.,I_TTT.e~~' i_~1dF-TrrT,.~;~ PHC~':TY. 11pF-Ei,':. ~•,.~^
'; .5 (t .`:,~.? (:QPi !?, 11R,^F ?hr,^_ (;rip?rp ?,,FGC~ ?~a ft r';
4~,~r,?'' prrp.T ~, c,-tr:~~ Tilp -;~1?i.," r~d~)c;t,APt= --,(ltl
:FtTrrkT F"TTi1
~. ~liT -~/nr n. ~,-.,.~~q 'L~ ~'~ CTt•1'-~ ~FL~! ip'F:r~•r. L~ei~~.
Fr # L'E?:?l!'iF 1~Fc;r4~TF•mT~?~ r,..+: ;T=.;m
h,:,:•.,:::
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
r~'`'~:i?~ ~ ~?ri r~'tcTF,?TZ'= FITFi:.~1-;TF~:FT. 4~~~5 ~
l,~,fi?~; TT T?At'~iF TT TTJAT?,RR;?, ^'RA.Ti T=it T~TT~'•u q~ -
.
94(;$lt? TA.Ep~ITRER PFTT4' t~~^~i-j r,~F.?T:tB PETT'r CG.^-,H ?~
Gfi
~,~0~.=~~ TRF,AS?JREF~ PFTT`,' ('ASH 1~FTh1R TRATPd?pir_~ ~~_f!~
riF.PAF'T[YtFT1T Tf?Tpt. ____ 4'1 `.:?4
------------------------------
g5t)(1[i? CF-T,I,t?I,A~ >:+AtF-T?1r~~=;~. F?it1TaE Tt;=;F-'=TA},gErr' 1 f ,'f!
9,~:C1?~fl F~~!TfiR^T_,~ fi,~,~;T['• ~A,.?T[? T?~_Cif1
T'i1=Ph.P.T1~iF1`tT T{~TAT., ____ ?.i,4,?p
~Tp~ET'
------------------------------
G,,~~.,4 F:~~! ~~TFFT=T t..Tf,KTTp?r? ? L?~_,,;,
4,~,t1^; ~ti c[:[!TT RdF.h{F:t:F'K FrtflWTi•?~~IHA.^FT~iT=.P?T ~f!_it(1
g~,n? ~~ c;rnTT r~?~r~Fr~..FU P~1?ltdTTdi;%Fr'. F'T?-) ~~T=:T~, ~;~ _ r},l
9n(11 ~1 ~T":~'?TT PxFhiT=~:T;T{ A'If}Y;TT'd~~.'AT~~R o r
~_7:!
'~:!1?T = L~T'I,F;~fti rrar (.r.`..'yt;FP3%A!:FTYT L~dF ~,:1r!
4:~Ct~9? 1-j11f;?iF~ T..i?htP,F.T~ t:il .S7'AKF.^-.,~RATi..rS.~[:FMF.t'IT MT's _~f].Atl
`?:ifl4~4 ?i T M7=;AT:L. A~_F, HAF±r:[-IA.E'F f1PFT~~~.TTT?f; c:ilpp[ TF~; ^c, ~rc
4=:n~;=:? tT?~'TArv C'(1T7p, t1r~?TFs'?RM Cj.Ft~??-REPOT ?~n.a:~
9F,ilr:~i(~ ,T v. (, q[TT[7 VFTiT~T:F RFFATra .Clfi
4''tl=h~ $7XTV Ff1tTR FTA~ AP7 , '='AltiTt'~ / c Tr` ~4 _ -
?f Ci"{!~ [;EP.T1df;FA. G+T G.' Ti?t' ?A T TFF.'TEL;%FAT;'RT{^p,r:~Fr; ;~, ~~
.
'~:=:~!?T ~ ApAr:-t}1't.~Ht'1t'~fr~. T?Tf~_ A^-.PHAI.T%F:T~F~;T F'FF+c,TAC; ~,~'~ '~
~
9,~,[i7'! ? AP?CHnR =Tn~?E f`fl t~RTl^NF_.p RTtf~ ~f15, 1 c,
9L(1?14 R.RT'TEfilll ~tiT?('j?FTF_, t:(? ~`0?{('TiFTF,~P.FF,9TR~ " _?"$.(!Q
tbCi^1° r_.iTt° rARAGr PARTS G.'95 ~~~.~
~it,f!?7 ~: !;~'1 SYSTEMS T'TTFT,,rrITEcFT, q;'~~ ~}??_~~
r~r~f)??g F'E?f1f;T='FTE ~::TTRT?$(~TiTTER,111AT_T{ F'FppT??S Sfi.Cii1
,.~,t1H1,.~ =A,M`S ('i,TFT=! [~FFTrF .^-,1TT'PT.TF~ 1~.5n
;,~fj41r SAr"~: t''t,t1i~? *~Tr(' S?IFPT.Tr'= '?~i_~4
9titl~t'?Q TT?'FA.StTRF..1? T;FTT`.' f'A~;H T~1=Ttr[R ~PTdr. c.:.f~T?FFRE_.Td~:F ~?.~rC!(1
?,il1;=t.~t•'~ T??F,tiiTkEi,~ F'FTT~ t':A=;T-' RFTh?R 11FTTV {~AcH 9,~,,'?5
i'i>=FARTt4FT'T Tf1TA?. ____
_;;?7_~i
~~FrF~ r TT~:lrr t :F}.ITFF
------------------------------
-'t~±ic i:T '.Y (-i f~rr*.'E:fiF vL: ~,~~_ n''~c ~- .~?
;~e?ILRAT FIrT.tn
7 n/1 =„ _~ ,~„ =,-.:~~ p i~' -..~ -?,~~_, RFF~;>t~T ~Rppt,1R PG~,r•
Pry ~ trt'}.,ris~R T'i,r.-,,~F,TF'TT~-~;`d ~?,77-1TT*iT
tr':,'t?1,=, r:[i ~'i~;T$rt~=, F??rr r;TF~_F~ q:?~ 1:~,?q
R~tl?,~'- T?If'F*:I=R r~'dTTElR?AI: '=;T?FfiT,TF'=;:~i~iu:' t;4 FA F?_[lil~'r. 4~f,<5~t
ahQ?,S? XINP"I:T. ACF HP..RLi[~A.R.E ~'~'RT.,At'T= ~;Tt:1t.FFd T,.'!(lL~ ll~,f.3
9r,i1~1 n :=,~tA''=. ~'j..TiR ,TANTTCIRT~I. ~Il~pj,TF~ 4:?,??
9rt,!1R?tl TpF:~,c;ilF+F;14 FF'TT`t [:A'=T~ ~'FT:.k!F! F'FTT`r ~Qc;~I 1.1._9.=1
T~FPA.T?Tt*f~'?~TT T~1TAT. ____ ,~5?, =;3
C'1~}ltATI€ITTY r:EtdTFR
------------------------------
9, {7 !?°? t:FI..t,ti~,~.? ~J??F-?`TII..,S4 Purt~IF ?1'=.F-Rt`_F~.Rfi.TT~' 1n.fit3
Q~rE~~~~ ~?kI..-ntaRT M~.TF.T ~rFPLTF.~= h,5?
T7FPARTMFI'~T TtTT~:?, ____) ].,~.~'?
PRRt' MATFdT~"~At~T±~~'
------------------------------
r,Ei?1 ~ r.TT`r' ~a~4GF ~t.~'T:=: g;'a~ 13.,-.~.
'_/,=,~!°?1,~ ~;ft ~`7L;TFPA~ F?IF.?.!?',TFeFr '~'`3''', 1(i5_?Fi
?,5fr?9(] S~R?,:F`r' n1~fE~T'~ t?!:?tyt F1.,M r_R~'FF! -.?_ ~
. .,, E.tl
?nf}?'~1. ?: b,F?R`t' TTT9*1FR h=:,nt~,t T-~ti~'7I:=%~~~TT~ 4?x;1.11(!
Q.,n^,~? KTMB~~.L. ArE HARL~WAFF F~ ~ tiT.~'=;TTF~L~i.Tl=..~' F?A`r`~iF.~ 41 ~~~
1 ...,.
T1FPA.RTi~IF...?~T TC1TA;_ ====3 ?1~.~Ct
Fr;npzn?r ~ r. T"iRTIF_.I.C)P~4EtdT
------------------------------
9,Ci(1f;7 CFI.LTT'.AR t1NR-TTTI..r_,A T'HilpTF [i~E-i-!AF'JjTAI 1.!,,(1Ct
9:i (1~i(1R LdP.I.-MART (FFTC'F: ~TIppI.TF~ 4`'r~i"
9,4(14:~t1 TAF.AcTIRFF pFTT~' C'.,1~SH TaFTM~ PF;TTy ?'A~F-T 1''.5[1
4,~(1~:~(i T1aFA'~ITRFR RFTTY ~P,.''+i-? RRiF1?r^, T~FT"'9 !'A'=H 1.Oc
-af,DB=, I? TRFr~tIF'ER PFTTY CA'=,H r!','1~?+'lr!Tf: ?~1Fdr.1.: !-~FR~'TC:fi~ 15!?_t]~}
1'1EFhRTtAeThT Tf1TPt.., ____' ?''?_~?
F°~i '~,+ ?{Frjrtf;t~ rtF.'=?~~TpTT~;p? ?,p~i~;}Tj~,~
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
~Et~F.~~j.I.. cnyE~tdr~FidT
------------------------------
~~,Qi;=~` FFfit~`.LF`~' A.J?t+1Ir3T~TRaT(?R~ 4DFtIr; FED x`4.17
ab~14~f1 (1t~1fl'~!~Cl PHi'~~ICA?_ T?iFRAF`7 H R??BFR^;,~=riT~ 7?.(1(1
PtTPij'i T!7TAT, ____? 4'S?,17
11~ ~,1~FtTI-.~1vi'.F -~F~'k?f:t=. F'TT?r'i
P 1 -, c. q.=~7*=i ~/~ r'' CTir• pr,:~L~- :~PGA7N F•
" Pt1 # ~'F ~trii ~~' SST='-:r'~~TfiTTnt•I Q~{~1TT?'~T
bP~Tr;TTT.AP~tF`
------------------------------
P~S0151 t1F'1~TCAT, GOPIPI.,IAI~tt_E SPFGIA RTn-wASTR StTPPLIE
R,-C~;~4? i rI:I.,IiL•AR r1NET-7T~[i?.^-.A PHf)1'~TF t~TfiF.-~T,IT: L+
'"1~~1~c~ t~tEUirI.A.I ~t~, 16r ~.. ~TI.~LTrrr ~-;~T,,'t~l ~C•,r3
9,~,t1~~~ TTTT~:•A PART! t_LT14Ifi VAGGTNATT~~xt~
~~n??j naxlaY ^rRiTrr5 BP4T TRATPdT*It:;
a,~,n??? PAGE PROLt?TGT^ nF TIIT,SA TN GYt.TNP.ER REt?TAT...
^~6tt?~ tiTT~_~._ PARK GT,IPdTG HRP 8 tf'A.t=:GT1TA,TTt1It
DEP~.PTMF?•;T T[1TAL = _ _ _
PtTt~E~ TOTAL. _ _ _ _
(1,OCi
q ` tl . b ()
i. ~~7 :~.'7C
. ~ Lim .'
b55,1?
?"t1 „ 0 4
?I `. tilt
'l, f,(iri, ch
t TTY f!L' !-fG~I~~-c;rr
j t} rT : ~r,c - '~:'' :r~ ~!1-' (-'~ 6?a1 r-' FL'T-':^?^?' ai~A=?J~' GL_r;F!
~'~,i+ ~?F?j['~('}tr~ T}~~_;rprpm-~'?~? aFif!TT'TT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
------------------------------
9r`~(i?? ~ WF?,S~:n Tr;C (l~:Y!;1?PdlP.~-FT`~T.FPdF
?f:(i'~?:~ il`itdG ~;Y~TFMfi ^jT(IP ~ti1~P? TT=Y
~~:4Ca,51" MT?,Fp.!;E hid^TFFa~ TTpF~l1?'F~T1±^
~,'if?f; T~i~.:I~I~T.I.. ,'1Tj_. ~-:{)r?~ F:4RT~.r~sTT.!T,TTRRTC'A}tT'
9nt1.,1 ~ t?~, ~`t~T1=M~ ~'iTrT.!L?TF~~'. ?/q
o~,~r?~y T~;?!'~F' -~IQC~F;lA3 ~FPTIC '. WA.~H NA.? WA~;TF T',T~T~s"i~At,
9~i??^~ $~.??,E`~ Ffa?1TpT~FFdT 1?F~4T?~ i'ARi-;
'?f~t;~f?C? FXTDr ; (:GIBE F?,1TT1'.RTT'~;
9fCa~(1t, Fs.RTS ~i..TT~ ciIPPT.T1=.^~
~~(T~IaI p~rT~ P?,i.F~ PA.T~T
`-?,5f,1,L',t~4 ~TF~'R~' IsIt7f11'JS 6dFT_,??Tl~f~ 'r~IFT.T1TNrlj (Mr?Gt,
Gf,~°11? L'T?+tp9T.I.: A~:F H~T~T'il~t~1=~ T~~,TtdT~??AF::.-:T= ~[TFFI.:TT=~;
9~(1;?(1^ WAT..-ti~.T7T CTtRt~F cT•r-TT'=?-T(?p,rem~'if;i.
9:5 (1~[9C1 bdTT,T.TAM~ ~'FFTT^F T=C~iFj?TrtF..PdT 1~aR.T,r1,:~?T7a?,
~:~t1~7!1 TfITT.L,TAP~r;RR>=?1~F ~rT.TTFAIT=.PdT Pll?T'=!T.f7T}A`.
4L>1$?(t t~iTl:i..TRI~'= REF'[i~F i?,;aLTZPt*~~'11T PART~l_,tlT1al,
'':5t'1~^~i TF?pp.~TTR~t? Pp.TT`~ r~~~ RFTF4F PF'1'TY t:A=;LT
r?FP~.RT~tF.NT Tc~ITAL = _ _ _'>
??_d.(}
14?_^?
'~~? ~ 5(i
'?f14,;?5
~_9h
I~. +?~'
°5~ . ~+h
?x_44
,~,~4 _
~~; ~,f~
a 9 _ G ~,
?:'.:jf,
:"~_Q:i
A ry.rCC
-;~ ''~
1~_q
4_nr rte, 4
4_~4;~t.i.~
ji
I:M.F'TT?T. TPrT!=FnVFh1FATT~---;
1~'1.?.~~~ 9'- ;?:? Q/P f:T.ATkT~-, RFi~~i:•°T a.F•°.,P;'fi T3~ii;F:
T?!'i ~ VF'?~TT?ils: ~iF~:~:RTpmT;~xr ,1Ts;~TT?TT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
------------------------------
960;x.=t4 fiR~~?'~WA r CARFF.T C'f1 TTT.F 4?,
9r',it4:~~ G,~,RY n~~F' TFhiC7I?~t,. t?i=F?CF 1.=.5.0(?
96t7~?6 H?1C~HE8 t..tJr~1~ERr_.n hTpTF.1-tTp1.S!REM~1L~Et. .=~~.:~?
IiFP~RTrAENT TilTA.I~, ____~ ?RO-$`
1?
~':t+PTTA?.. PRC1:TFi~T!=~ ~;F'Q`•m
F l.T.... ,-. RFPr?R, ApAroR PA~,F.
Ft~ #
---------- VFt~??~~R
---------------- ?'iF^~:RTFTT;:?•;
--------- -------------------- pq,_,trRim
----- -------------
r:~Ef;-?~~?~
---------- rilhlTF~di=T 45q;r F?)
----------------- ~?
---
94p$4~ Ti1L,~A [s1(1Rj,I) T>F~A1. hIf7TTf'R 1?~R75
r>FpARTn1FA~T Tl1TA? . ____} q ~
1"_~ _
CL~E~~:-EI?TE'. PAFC'I~Tf_1*d pRt):TFC:T
------------------------------
~:!,(1?:~4 TTiT,~p w!?RL:L~ ~,~.~A1. Tdf1TT%:~'~~ ~fi,~~
F(Ip•~T? TfETAj, ____) ^:'9.4fJ
CITY OF OWASSO
A/P TRANSFER REPORT
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TRANSFERS
CEMETERY CARE REVENUE TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUN 155.63
AMBULANCE CAPITAL REVENUE TRANSFER FROM AMBULANCE F 2,976.13
TRANSFERS TOTAL 3,131.76
CITY OF OWASSO
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 09/30/95
OVERTIME TOTAL
DEPARTMENT EXPENSES EXPENSES
>;:
~~~t
,..:
Finance 0.00 6168.57
...... .~r~~ .. ....... ..... ~~7~'T,Z~:
Municipal
Court
0.00 1,414.58
.
.........................
::.~ :::::::::::::::::::.:::..~ :..:~::.~.:~:::::::.::...................
...
Building
Maintenance
0.00 406.92
.
:::::::::..~ ::.::.::::::::::::.:::::::::.::::.::::::::::
:::::
.....:...:.....::..:...:.:..::..........................:.::::.:::::::.::::::::::.:::::::::.::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ...
::::::::::.::::::.:::.::
:::::::::::::::::.:::::7:.:::.:::::::::::::.:::.
Central Dispatch
28.95 4,445.06
.:..:
:.~.:~:::::::.~:::.~:::::.~ ::::::::::::::::::::.~:::.:::::::::::::.
~~4~.6.;~~~Q
..
.
::::::
':::::
: ~ ::::::::::::::v:
::
:
iiiiii:<.ii:4
:
: ...
:::::::::::::::::::
~~4~:::
i:v^iii:.iii
.
:
:
:::. ~. ~ :::::::
::. ~::. ~:::
v:::::
ii}i}i}i:
v:
y
ii
• ::.......:...::..::.:. :.::::: :w:::...:........... :w; •.. :::::.:.: :.:: :::v: :v::::: :.:::: :::::v; :.:::::.: ~:: ::::::::v. ~::::. ~:: iiiii:ry:.i:.i:.i:
::::::::::: ::::::w::.~::::::::::::::: v::v:
Fire 675.23 31,328.51
.:..~.~...':::.::~:.>:.>:.i:.i::.;:.i:.:.i:.~.ii~;.;:.:.;: ::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~.~...~:r~;:.i:.i:.
......................................:......:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:.i:.i:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.ii:.i"~` . ~I,~..:::.
::::::::::..:::::::i::x~::.>:•>iii:.ii:::
Recreation Center 83.44 2 608.12
~
......
::::>::::>::::>:::>:>::::>::>.::::::>:<>:~ > <:»>»i::::>::>::::>::>::>::»;:::<:::»::::>::::::::::>::>::»>:: »::::>:<:::>::>::>::>:::::»:i :<i,:>::»»::»>::::>::>::>::>:>:::><>/: ;;:::..;;::iii:>::;,:ii:>:::
:.>.:.~:::::::::. pp }=~F /~,,
f.
~~~
f~~~
~~
~
~
~'
~~
~
~
!
.::
iiii;4};::::. ~ ::::::::::::::::. ~. ~:::::::: :.::.
:
i
.: T: T
.
.
::::: .}}:
:.::: ~::::: iiiiiiiy:iTF :
i
Park Maintenance 0 00 2 395 54
APPROVE 10/17/95
Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
CITY GARAGE
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 09/30/95
DEPARTMENT
OVERTIME TOTAL
EXPENSES EXPENSES
Garage $0.00 $2,064.54
APPROVE 10/17/95
~ Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
i~
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RELATING TO
TULSA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AUTHORITY
DATE: October 13, 1995
BACKGROUND:
As a part of an overall strategy to construct and operate a new county jail facility, the Board of
Commissioners for Tulsa County created the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority. The
Authority, created under Title 60 of the Oklahoma Statutes, was the product of a promise made
by the Commissioners to representatives of the county's municipalities. Prior to the sales tax
election, the Commissioners agreed to the concept of the Authority as a means of providing
municipal input into the spending of sales tax dollars earmarked for the jail. As a part of the
sales tax ballot, the Authority was listed as being comprised of the three County Commissioners,
the Mayor of Tulsa, and three additional Mayors from municipalities located within the county.
On September 12, 1995, the voters of Tulsa County approved a sales tax increase based on the
explanation of the manner in which the funds would be spent and who would oversee the
spending. Immediately after the election, the Mayors of most of the county's municipalities met
and selected three of their number to be appointed to the Criminal Justice Authority. On
September 18th, the Board of Commissioners rejected that recommendation because it lacked
"geographic representation" (one county commission district was not represented by a Mayor
from that district). Subsequently, on September 20, the area Mayors again met and again voted
to recommend three names to the County Commissioners for appointment to the newly created
Authority. Prior to that meeting, Commissioner Harris met with the Mayors and successfully
appealed to them to ensure that their recommendation included someone from each district.
However, on September 24th Commissioner Harris asked the Commission to delay for two
weeks any action on the appointments, even though the Mayors had recommended someone from
each district. Then, on October 4th, Commissioner Harris filed a lawsuit charging that Mayors
could not serve on the Authority because of the "dual office holding" prohibition in the state
statutes.
Subsequent to that action, several of the area City Attorneys joined forces to develop a strategy
for ensuring municipal representation on the Authority. The attorneys concluded that the most
effective and least costly solution would be to have each city in the county accept beneficial
RESOLUTION #95-12 -CRIMINAL JUSTICE AUTHORITY
October 13, 1995
Page 2
interest in the Authority. Such an action would have the effect of answering Commissioner
Harris' lawsuit and making its need irrelevant in so far as the law relating to dual office holding
is concerned.
The vehicle selected to initiate the concept of each city accepting beneficial interest in the
Authority is the attached Resolution #95-12. The resolution simply states the City Council's
intent to accept beneficial interest in the Authority should the County amend the Trust Indenture
to provide for the cities to be named as beneficiaries.
Adoption of the resolution will in no way result in the acceptance of any liability of the
Authority, nor will such action result in the expenditure of city funds for any of the Authority's
expenses or debts. This is simply a method to resolve a question relating to whether or not city
officials can legally serve on this public trust.
On October 12th the Tulsa City Council adopted a similar resolution. Sand Springs, Broken
Arrow, Skiatook, Jenks, Glenpool and Sperry have all scheduled similar resolutions for their
Council's consideration during the week of October 16th (it is uncleaz at this point if Collinsvile
and Bixby will consider resolutions).
COMMENTS:
• Municipal representation has not only been promised, but such representation is important
as a criteria for the future use of sales tax by non-municipal governmental entities.
• The voters were promised municipal representation on this Authority and were led to
believe that a joint Authority would oversee all expenditures.
• The new sales tax will deliver about twenty-six (26) million dollazs to the county. The
county's current budget is about twenty-five (25) million dollars. Thus the county's
revenue will double with this tax. Local representation by cities is needed to ensure the
pre-election concerns raised by the Mayors and City Managers aze addressed as priority
issues.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends Council adoption of Resolution #95-12.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution #95-12
2. News article dated October 8, 1995
3. Correspondence to county from Tulsa Chamber of Commerce dated October 6, 1995
' CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
RESOLUTION NO 95-12
A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, PROVIDING ASSURANCE TO THE BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, THAT THE
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA WILL Il1~fEEDIATELY ACCEPT
BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN AND TO THE TULSA COUNTY CRIMINAL
JUSTICE AUTHORITY UPON AMENDMENT OF ITS TRUST
INDENTURE ESTABLISHING THE CTTY OF OWASSO AS AN
EXPRESSED BENEFICIARY OF SAID TRUST.
WHEREAS, the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority ("Authority"), a public trust,
has heretofore, on September 1, 1995, been created by the Boazd of Commissioners of Tulsa
County, Oklahoma ("Board") for the expressed purpose of administering sales tax funds relating
to the construction and operation of a county jail and/or other detention facilities ("Facility")
within Tulsa County, Oklahoma, to serve, in the manner provided by law, all residents of said
county living both within and without the limits of all cities and towns in said county; and,
WHEREAS, the registered voters of Tulsa County, on September 12, 1995, approved
the passage of afive-twelfths percent (5/12%) County sales tax to be administered by the
Authority for the purpose of acquiring a site and erecting, furnishing, equipping, operating,
maintaining, remodeling and repairing a county jail and other detention facilities owned or
operated by Tulsa County, of which two/twelfths percent (2/12%) is required to end on
October 1, 2001, or upon payment or provision for payment of all Facility indebtedness,
whichever date occurs first; and,
WHEREAS, the entirety of the Authority's stated functions exclusively relate to the
funds generated by said County sales tax, as administered by a seven (7) person Board of
Trustees comprised of three (3) Tulsa County Commissioners, the Mayor of the City of Tulsa,
and the Mayors of three (3) additional cities situated in whole or in part within the limits of
Tulsa County, Oklahoma; and,
WHEREAS, the composition of the Authority's Boazd of Trustees was established by
the Tulsa County Board of Commissioners prior to the passage of the County sales tax and,
thereafter, was publicized as an inducement to secure approval of the proposed County sales tax
by the voters of Tulsa County, who were assured that the combination City and County elected
officials serving on the Authority's Board of Trustees would provide exceptionally qualified
Authority management which would secure and protect the interests of all citizens of Tulsa
County; and,
WHEREAS, on October 4, 1995, a Petition in cause numbered PT-95-35 was duly filed
in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, alleging that service of city Mayors on the
Authority's Board of Trustees may constitute a violation of Oklahoma's dual office holding
statute and, consequently, disqualify any city Mayor from serving as an Authority Trustee; and,
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Oklahoma expressly allow a city Mayor to serve
as a Trustee for a public trust which is created for the benefit of the Mayor's municipality, and
the amendment of the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority's Trust Indenture to establish the
City of Owasso and other municipalities situated wholly or in pazt within Tulsa County as named
Authority beneficiaries will allow fulfillment of the commitment to voters of Tulsa County made
by the Tulsa County Boazd of Commissioners on September 1, 1995 in approving the
Authority's Trust Indenture identifying four (4) Mayoral Trustees and, additionally, both render
moot the claimed legal issue in the identified lawsuit and allow restoration of non-adversarial
relations between county and city governments; and,
WHEREAS, establishment of the City of Owasso and other Tulsa County municipal
governments as named beneficiaries of the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority will allow
all named cities to directly facilitate the funding of facilities built by the Authority and thereby
substantially reduce the amount of sales tax funds required to pay for said facilities, to the end
that the two-twelfths percent (2/ 12 %) temporazy sales tax can be retired eazlier than possible by
any other type of debt funding;
NOW THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA:
That the Council herewith expresses its desire and intent to accept beneficial interest in
and to the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authority immediately upon amendment of the
Authority's Trust Indenture in the manner provided by law to provide that the City of
Owasso is a named beneficiary of said Trust.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 1995 by the City
Council of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
Charles L Burris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ronald D Cates, City Attorney
2
Transitions 20 TV ~~ /~ ~L
CI1 11 i^1i1/~aA
..
ommission Isn't Keep~~
Das c~. Pow
Fd Fa..ell - - acting of
.dd Smfl w;uer ANALYSIS at me T,d,.
eat Dr ~~
m
.___. ____:__:____ _._ .._,_.._ .:.,.. en..eo, idea of the auenortr is aaa aemrn
clues to the Tulsa Counly Criminal
slice AuNOrity on Monday afternoon.
Fhe Item is on the posted agenda.
But Dazed op past nlstory, tlon't believe
As wiln vvtually everyfning to do with
authority so tar, noWing has occurred
yylavnm or promises.
Certainly, attic al[eption. nas been
Id to the promise matle [o county vot-
rprior m me scot. trsalea as eteq
east e~omiee: signed Dr ml mree nom-
azron rsaaa ene mayota of au agnt
TULSA WORLD, SUNDAY, 0
..Power PI
Caadaved brim Naws ,] . alts
lo^gnme :ale rnerve at cur ear. ee
enl, was being sougnt by a
fiscally choked county govern- PrC
t.
m Tnat c nslituled a all [
tnreae to me owes. so a aeai rw,: „ _
tllcl tealuring despp lion,
d soma serious sKetcMng o!
note is aometwng tar mode
ones u..wnde
amd Nnr. u.
tart ~aege is to
miu~e for me
lU/U9/95 U9:4U ZS918 585 8386 'TULSA CHAMB~:H
October 6, 1995
Commissioner Robert N. Dick
Tulsa County Administration Building
504 South Denver
Tulsa, OK 7~ 143-3 826
Dear Bob:
As you are well aware, our organization supported the recent successful sales tax election
for a new county jail. As you also know, we strongly urged the establishment of tiie
Criminal Justice Authority ... and its makeup of the three County Commissioners plus four
Mayors.
One of the accrual benefits, as we see it, for the establishment of the Authority is the
opportunity to meld the City of Tulsa and Tulsa County into a substantive inter-
governmental function.
With that background in mind, we are quite disturbed about the situation that has
developed regarding the legal status of the Mayors as members of the Authority. We
recognize tl3at if there is a legitimate Legal question concerning the Mayor's service, it
seems judicious to have the question resolved by the courts. We do hope that will be done
as soon as possible.
In the interim, until the question is resolved, we strongly urge that the Board of County
Commissioners delay any decision on the expenditure of funds relating to the construction
of the new jail, We believe that public creditability would be seriously eroded if action is
taken prior to the establishment of the seven member Authority-
If the courts rule that the Mayors cannot serve, we would hope that the Board of
Commissioners would aggressively seek a remedy that would permit the Mayors to serve
on the Authority. if for some reason that might not be legally permissible, then we would
suggest that to maintain the concept of the cities being represented on the Authority, the
County Commissioners consider asking those Mayors that were to be appointed, select a
representative of their choice and in that way the concept of city representation could be
satisfied.
' Metropolitan Tl~lsa Chambec of Commerce
616 Soutb Boston, Suite 100
zwisa, ox ~au~-lz~s
' (918)585-1201 • Fax (912;)S85-ftOl6
X002/QUA
ivi vai vv vv. vs yviv vvv vvvv a~~a.an ~.nnnaDC,t~ l[/J UVJ/UUJ
Commissioner Robert N. Dick
Page Two
October 6, 1995 ~
We would hope that the Board of County Commissioners would seriously consider our
suggestions and act affirmatively upon them. In our opinion, the creditability of the
Comission is "on the line" and we would hope that our recommendations would help to
offset what we perceive to be a very negative situation.
We stand ready to assist your efforts in any way possible .and we will appreciate your
reaction and response. „~
Sincerely,
~, G
~~-
t liam S. Doenges Ba~ J. Gardner
Chairman Chairman-elect
y .Cole
Pre ent
cc• Mayor Susan Savage
Mayors of the Cities in Tulsa County
1
1
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J. RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL ON EXPENDITURE AND
RATIFICATION OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 12, 1995
BACKGROUND:
On September 19, 1995, City Council approved the purchase of a 1994 Chevrolet Blazer for the
Police Department. This vehicle had been generously loaned to the police canine program for
over one year. State law allows for the purchase and payment to take place simultaneously upon
approval of City Council. The presentation made that night did not include a request for
payment.
A series of errors occurred which resulted in the omission of this payment from the claims list
at the October 3rd Council meeting. Classic Chevrolet had waited over one year for the
payment of this vehicle and had displayed enormous patience with this purchasing procedure.
' It was determined that the errors of the City should not preclude the immediate payment of this
bill approved by Council. On Thursday, October 5th, I approved the issuance of a check for
$20,598.45 to Classic Chevrolet for the payment of this debt. The check was hand-delivered
~ by the Police Chief Alexander to Mike Frizzel of Classic Chevrolet.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council approval and ratification of action taken by the City Manager in the
payment of $20,598.45 to Classic Chevrolet.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: REGENA PARSONS
SUBJECT: 1VIUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1995
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso, through its use of a variety of insurance products, programs, and safety
and health education training, seeks to minimize the City's exposure to risk. The single most
important component of the Risk Management Plan is the comprehensive municipality liability
product.
During the October 2, 1995, City Council work session, the renewal of the General Liability
policy for the City was discussed. As you know, the City's liability is restricted to limits
established under the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act. Liability for claims "inside"
the Act are limited to: (1) $25,000 each property damage, (2) $100,000 each other loss per
occurrence, and (3) $1,000,000 aggregate per occurrence. The coverage for "Tort Limits" is
a standard part of any municipal liability policy. However, Owasso, as most other entities,
purchases additional coverage for those losses "outside" the Act.
For several years, the City of Owasso has participated in the Municipal Liability Protection Plan
offered by the Oklahoma .Municipal Assurance Group (OMAG). Covered under the general
liability section is bodily injury, property damage, personal injury, and errors and omissions.
The City of Owasso self-insures its Vehicle Collision and Comprehensive risk, and purchases
liability insurance to cover only bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage exposure.
The premium paid to OMAG for this coverage from November 1994-95 was $63,982.74. The
renewal premium quoted from OMAG is $56,072.69, a reduction in premium of $7,910.05.
The 1995-96 premium reduction from quotes received speak very clearly to the positive side of
competition. The current carrier, OMAG, has supplied coverage, paid claims, furnished reports,
provided service and training in a timely and professional manner. However, it appears that the
availability of competing coverage has resulted in a substantial reduction in the cost of that
coverage.
Earlier this year, you received a memorandum outlining insurance in place on behalf of the City
MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
October 10, 1995
Page Two
and the procedure for renewing any policy. This procedure requires that prior to the renewal
date of any policy, a local independent agent is asked to search the "market" for a product that
is not only cost efficient, but possesses other qualities such as claim paying ability, stability, etc. ~
As a result of the renewal procedure, J - P Hogan Insurance Agency, Owasso, OK., submitted r
a quote from National American Insurance Company (NAIC) to the City for its municipal
general liability insurance. The quote from this carrier for the 1995-96 year is $55,167, some
$7,670 less than their quote for 1994-95. The NAIL quote is $905.69 less than the renewal
offer from OMAG.
ANALYSIS:
The quotes received from both providers classify and/or group coverage using very different
methods. Some of the variances can have a major impact on the overall expense of claims filed
against the City.
General Liability - under this section of coverage, claims are paid for such things as a citizen
who steps into a hole where the water meter lid has either "floated off" during a rain or
disappears. Other type claims paid under this coverage would be a citizen whose windshield is
damaged by a City owned grass mower, or a home damaged by a sewer back-up. ~
The coverage offered by NAIC and OMAG both include the limits established under the
Oklahoma Governmental Tort Act. However, above those limits there is a significant difference
in coverage. NAIL has an annual aggregate of $2,000,000 -- OMAG does not have a limit for ~
the amount of claims they will pay under the general coverage section. This is the area of
coverage with the largest amount of claim activity. Neither policy in this section has a
deductible.
OMAG: All legal fees, other fees, supplementary expenses are (win, lose, or draw) included
in the coverage provided with OMAG. There are no additional fees, nor is the amount of
coverage reduced by such charges, all costs are absorbed by the carrier.
NAIC: Conversely, only the defense costs of approved claims are covered in the NAIL policy.
The policy reviewed does not specifically address what the charges would or could be regarding
any defense cost and/or supplementary expenses if a claim was submitted and then denied.
Pollution Damage - is provided by both carriers but there are differences in the total amount ~
of coverage and definition of coverage offered. Specifically, NAIC provides coverage in the
amount of $10,000 per incident, a $10,000 Annual Aggregate, with a $1,000 deductible. The
OMAG provides coverage of $25,000 per occurrence, $100,000 Annual Aggregate with a
a
' MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
October 10, 1995
~ Page Three
deductible of $1,000. However, the OMAG offer also includes coverage for pesticide
application and underground storage tanks. Owasso requires coverage for both of these risks.
Training and Education - is furnished by OMAG from Law Enforcement Television Network
(LETN) and Municipal Electric Systems of Oklahoma (MESO) who provide safety training for
the Police, Parks, and Public Works Department employees. This training is the backbone of
the continuing education and safety requirements mandated by OSHA and departmental policy.
The cost for this training has been off-set with credits from OMAG that reduce the basic liability
premium.
During this past year the Loss Control and Management Issues Division of OMAG added a
number of timely and professionally delivered training seminars that are available to all
employees. Example: Conflict Resolution, Work Place Violence, Effective Communication, etc.
These services are provided on a "no-cost" basis to the City. This quality training would cost
several thousand dollars to deliver to City employees.
Training and Education were not addressed in the policy and quote received from NAIC.
Although this area was not specifically mentioned in these documents, most carriers do provide
some training and education services. This training can vary widely, but is generally furnished
by most carriers.
COMMENTS:
• National American Insurance Company quote and offer of coverage provides broad coverage
limits of $1,000,000 aggregate for General Liability, $2,000,000 aggregate for Law
Enforcement and $2,000,000 aggregate for Public Officials coverage. However, attached
to the quotes is an endorsement (see Attachment #2) which prohibits the combining of these
aggregate limits, and in fact, limits the applicable limit of insurance as well as affecting the
deductible. This limitation has been reviewed by Mr. Cates, City Attorney, as well as
Finance Director, Sherry Bishop. It is the opinion of Mr. Cates, Ms. Bishop and myself that
this endorsement effectively "takes away" any benefit of "stacking" coverage and restricts
the coverage to each single policy.
• The Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group quote and offer of coverage places no limit on
the aggregate amount under the general liability section. The aggregate limit for Errors
and/or Personal Injury (civil rights, federal issues) is covered with a $2,000,000 "basket"
of coverage that can be used to cover those losses.
• Selecting a product to cover unknown losses and risks for the City of Owasso for the next
twelve months is a decision that should not be driven entirely by numbers and the immediate
expenditure of dollars.
MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
October 10, 1995
Page Four
CONCLUSION:
Both quotes received were significantly lower than last year. The annual premiums submitted
are: $ 56,072.69 from OMAG and $55,167 from NAIC, a difference of $905.69. This dollar
difference is more than off-set by the difference in: (1) General Liability coverage limits
($2,000,000 with NAIC and unlimited, or no-limit with OMAG), (2) the difference in
deductible treatments, and (3) the training and education provided by OMAG.
The decision process as to which coverage is best for the City, is based on a comprehensive
review of not only cost, but a detailed comparison of coverage, charges, claims, etc. Attached,
(see Attachment #1) you will find a coverage analysis which compares coverage amounts, limits,
deductibles, etc.
RECOMMENDATION: ~
Staff recommends that the City of Owasso renew the Municipal Liability Protection Plan with
the Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group at the 1995-96 renewal rate of $ 56,072.69.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Comparative Analysis Information
2. NAIC Endorsement
3. NAIC 1995-96 Quote
4. OMAG 1995-96 Quote
NOTE: The two policies reviewed by the staff are available for your review, however, due to
their size they were not included in your packet. If you have questions, please call Ms. Parsons.
i~
NAIL
GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE ANALYSIS
OMAG
$1,000,000 Limits of Liability $1,000,000
per occurrence per occurrence
$2,000,000 Unlimited
annual aggregate annual aggregate
$ 10,000 Pollution $ 25,000
per occurrence per occurrence
$ 10,000 $ 100,000
annual aggregate annual aggregate
Not Covered Utility cut-off Utility Service
resulting in Covered
injury.
as E/0, PI
$ 50,000 Fire Damage Limit $ 25,000
any one fire within Tort limits
$ 100,000 Employee Benefits Admin. $100,000
each claim per occur.
$ 100,000 Unlimited
annual aggregate
OR, if a claim
resulting in E/O or PI $1,000,000
per occur.
$2,000,000
Annual Aggregate*
$ 1,000 $ 1,000
deductible shall apply deductible if
each claim damages paid
*OMAG Aggregate is a "basket" of $2,000,000
coverage for E/O and/or Personal Injury
~~ffa~hm~f ~-i
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE
NAIL
$1,000,000
per occurrence
$2,000,000
annual aggregate
$ l,ooo
deductible each
claim submitted
Limits of
Liability
OMAG
$1,000,000
per occurrence
$a,ooo,ooo
annual aggregate*
$ l,ooo
deductible if
damages are paid,
no expenses
*OMAG Aggregate is a "basket" of $2,000,000
coverage for E/O and/or Personal Injury
Public Officials and Law Enforcement
$ 100,000 Employment Related Acts $1,000,000
per occurrence per occurrence
$ 100,000 $2,000,000
annual aggregate annual aggregate*
$ 1,000 $ 1,000
deductible each deductible if
claim submitted damages are paid
*OMAG Aggregate is a "basket" of $2,000,000
coverage for E/O and/or Personal Injury
~~~GL,yy~~n~ /-~
i~
PUBLIC OFFICIALS WRONGFUL ACTS LIABILITY
ii
NAIC
$1,000,000
per occurrence
$2,000,000
annual aggregate
Limits of
Liability
$ 1,000
deductible each
claim submitted;
if an approved claim,
legal costs paid
by NAIL.
OMAG
$1,000,000
per occurrence
$2,000,000
annual aggregate*
$ 1,000
deductible if
damages are paid.
*OMAG Aggregate is a "basket" of $2,000,000
coverage for E/O and/or Personal Injury
No coverage Water cut -off resulting Utility Services
in Injury Covered
E/0, PI Limits
The Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act established specific
guidelines for payment of damages against a City:
$ 25,000 each Property Damage, Per Occurrence
$ 100,000 each other Loss Per Occurrence
$1,000,000 Aggregate Per Occurrence
,n ~~Q~Li~~e~f~-~
~7
NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
TWO OR MORE COVERAGE FORMS OR POLICIES ISSUED BY US
This Endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COIVIMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM
PUBLIC OFFICIALS WRONGFUL ACTS LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE PART
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEGAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
If this Policy and any other coverage form, endorsement, or policy issued to any insured by
National American Insurance Company or any company affiliated with National American
Insurance Company apply to the same "accident", "occurrence", "wrongful act", or claim, the
e,~gate ~ ~~ um lunit of uisuruance unde~r~~ covgerage.forms, endorsements, or policies
endorsement, or policy. l he deductible applicable to any such "accident", "occurrence",
'wvrongful act" or claim will be the deductible applicable, if any, to such coverage form,
endorsement, or policy which has the lowest applicable limit of insurance.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
ATTACHED TO AND FORMING A PART OF POLICY NUMBER:
INSURED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
DATE ISSUED:
MLP 114 (Ed. 4-95)
~ Jew ~ ~ l~n /J n l .-..!
NATIO!~AL ~ f Working together to provide
~.~:.
iVIERICAti ~~ ~~
COMP ~Y~ .~..-. Pro e Casual Professional
and Errors and Omissions Insurance Programs
INSURANCE QUOTATION
Proposal for
City of Owasso & Owasso
Pub/ic Woiks Authority
Effective 77/07/95
Presented By
J-P Hogan Insurance
P. O. Box 957
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055
(918) 272-3435
The Public Entity insurance is marketed
through local independent insurance agents
and endorsed by the Oklahoma Municipal League.
UNDERWRITING OFFICE
A t~ac~m~n~3-1
INSURANCE QUOTATION SUMMARY
GENERAL LIABILITY ANNUAL PREMIUM ...... .
• _ ........ .-.......... , $16,759
PUBLIC OFFICIALS ERRORS & OMISSIONS ANNUAL PREMIUM
... _ ...:.~,....... $9,855
LAW ENFORCEMENT PROF. LIABLTTY ANNUAL PREMIUM , ,
~,
............... -011,657
AUTOMOBII.E ANNUAL PREMIUM (CITY BID) ~
AUTOMOBII,E ANNUAL PREMIUM (P.W.A. BID) ... , , _ , , , , .. ~ • • ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' • • Y • $13,081
... _ _ , .._ , ..... ~ .. $3,815
OPTIONAL AUTOMOBILE SPECIFIED PERILS ANNUAL PREMIUM . , ... .
.......... $N/A -
INLAND MARINE ANNUAL PREMIUM ....... .
...............................$N/A
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LIABII.TTY A
NNUAL PREMIUM ..................... $Incl w/ GL ~
CRIME COVERAGE ANNUAL PREMIUM ... .
.................................$N/A
PROPERTY ANNUAL PREMIUM , ..... .
.....................................$N/A
GAS OPERATI
ONS GENERAL LIABILITY ANNUAL PREMIUM .... , . .
........... $N/A
TOTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM ........ .
. .~.
,:.
OPTIONAL 7~OTAL INSURANCE "
PREMIUM WITH A UTOMOBILE SPECIFIED PERILS . , , , , ,
$N/A
PREMIUM WITH. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLES
ONLY INSURED THROUGH OKLAHOMA RISK LIABILITY
DIVISION ........... 1~~A.NAGEMENT
.............. ............$N/A
cl)
n r ~ .,~
INVOICE
Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group
16 N.W. 63 Street, Suite 301, Oklahoma City, OK 73116-9115
405/842-9461 ~ (Fax)405/848-1449
^ To ; CITY QF QL+IASSQ
F'G BQX 18~:~
' Q~lASSn a Ok: 74~=?55
Date: September i8, 1995
Ag reerrien t : 9b-v 92-ti 8-C~C~ 5?
' A-1_ ter. t i on : t°1S t`IARC I A BOUTWELL CITY CLERF-::
Fern h1UhlIGIF'AL LIABILITY F'FiQTECTIOtd F'LAhI
For file period lVQUEt`'(BER 1, 1995 TO t~lOVEMBER 1. 1996
r
g ~ba?b~_L5 A,B,I.t?: General Liability; Bothly Injury and F'r-operty Damage
~ ~ 1?,i8i ,1T Ce F'er-sonal Injury
.Y 45'9.?,?1 D: Errors and C-m;.ssian=_., F'ut~?ic t?fficials Liability
n ~ i1,7~i~ebCt E,F: Auto Liability5 Bod.i_ly and Personal Injury and Proper-1=y Da,i,agc
~ ~ 4~°~.C~i_f G5t-I: Auto F`hysical Damage and Equipment F'hysicai Damage
TOTAL A1.1CiUh1T DUE : ~ 56 , c_~7~ . b~ Thank: `r ou !
This payment i= d!te on 1~lovember 1 ~ i995
Mail payment to address shown above.
NOTE: Unless a due date is stated above, this invoice is due and payable on or before the first day of the
agreement period.
~~
r h1 E? ' T r + ~~, _i l Fi, i, ~ ? 1_! r-~ is r] ~ ~ t.~ " _11 ~_? 6`J ~l _+. ~ ~ _~ ~~~~ ~ i = ~ 11
~ k- -- i.h~ it-, ~ Pr-.:~;r,i~_,.,;,: -~-~'GLG~ l71'~ht
~ ~ The Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group is an Interlocal Cooperation Act Agency of Cities and Towns Providing:
Group Life & Health Benefit Plan Municipal Liability Protection Plan Workers' Compensation Plan
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET AMENDMENT
DATE: October 13, 1995
BACKGROUND:
In February of 1993, the City Council adopted a policy that allowed for the use of carry-over
budgets. A carry-over budget is a concept wherein budgeted, unexpended funds from one fiscal
year may be re-budgeted or carried-over to the next fiscal year. The goal of a carry-over budget
is to encourage economy and efficiency in the use of budgeted funds.
Traditional budgets anticipate and reward the expenditure of all funds during the twelve month
fiscal year. Efforts by a manager to be efficient and save money results in the savings being
"given back" at the end of the fiscal year. The carry-over budget promotes a philosophy of
"save it and invest it" rather than "spend it or lose it. " Managers who save money from the
previous year's budget are rewarded by a carry-over budget the following year. This is the
fourth fiscal year for the city's managers to operate under acarry-over budget philosophy.
The 1994-95 General Fund revenue shortfall could have limited the ability to fund acarry-over
budget this year. However, the expenditure cuts that were accomplished by the managers offset
the revenue shortage and can fund this carry-over request and still maintain the existing General
Fund reserves.
The carry-over budget concept is based on a "business" approach to government spending and
is important to our overall goal of increased fiscal efficiency. Even though last year's revenue
shortfall created problems, our managers responded quickly and effectively. A carry-over
budget in spite of last year's problems will reward those managers and help ensure the
continuation of other business based decisions.
CARRY-OVER BUDGET
October 13, 1995
Page 2
REQLTEST•
Carry-over budget amendments have been requested for the Capital Improvements Fund, the
Revenue Bond Project Fund and six departments within the General Fund. Those carry-over
requests are summarized below. Some requests are for the completion of contracts or payment
of purchase orders that were outstanding at the fiscal year end. Those are indicated below with
the notation "FY 95 PO. "
Fund or Department Purpose Amount
General Fund:
Park Maintenance Department equipment $ 700
park & playground improvements 3,300
parking lot surfacing 8,000
Fire Department hand held radios 6,825
uniforms 3, 600
equipment (FY 95 PO) 4,420
Cemetery Department riding mower 2,400
Engineering Department computer software 5,700
plotter cover (FY 95 PO) 40
Finance Department computer, file cabinet & training 3,800
Community Development Dept video camera 3,000
Total General Fund $41,785
Capital Improvements Fund Hale Acres Drainage $13,312
Sports Park (FY 95 PO) 5,330
Total Capital Improvements Fund $18,642
Revenue Bond Projects Fund Intersection, 96 & Garnett $550
Memos from the managers or directors explaining each carry-over budget request are attached.
CARRY-OVER BUDGET
October 13, 1995
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommended budget increases for each department and fund are as follows:
General Fund--
Park Maintenance 12,000
Fire 14,845
Cemetery 2,400
Engineering 5,740
Finance 3,800
Community Development 3,000
Total General Fund $41,785
Capital Improvements Fund $18,642
Revenue Bond Projects Fund $550
Staff recommends approval of supplemental appropriations in the amount of $41,785 to the
General Fund, $18,642 to the Capital Improvements Fund, and $550 to the Revenue Bond
Projects Fund.
* Note: A carry-over supplemental appropriation to the Recreation Center department of
$10,241 was approved by the City Council on July 17, 1995. The total carry-over supplement
for the General Fund is $52,026.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Department requests
2. Memorandum dated January 29, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: MS SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PARKS DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR CARRY OVER BUDGET
DATE: October 6, 1995
The following items are being requested by the Parks Department to be funded through the carry
over budget process. It is my understanding that the Park Maintenance Budget has a carry over
of 17,013.80 from FY 94-95, from which staff is requesting $12,000.00 .
Gas Powered Motorized Broom
This will assist Parks Personnel in cleaning areas that often receive heavy traffic. For
example, Friendship Pazk, Gazebo's at Elm Creek and Rayola Pazks, Recreation Center
parking area for special events like Good Sam's and Car Shows, etc.
$ 700.00
Repairs to EIm Creek Park Trail
Increased erosion azound portions of the Elm Creek Park trail has resulted in the need
for both preventative and repair action to be performed to the Elm Creek Park trail's
western side. Purchasing of additional screenings, railroad ties, spikes and gravel will
be needed to complete this task.
$2,000.00
Shock Resistant Ground Cover
Shock resistant ground cover is needed for several of the azeas azound playground
equipment in the parks in order to comply with Federal guidelines. Wood chips or pea
gravel can be purchased to accomplish this task. Staff prefers wood chips.
$ 800.00
Sportspark Entrance Banners
The Sportspark landscaped entry walls, constructed in July of 1995, were designed for
interchangeable banners to be placed on them for various different events. Staff would
like to purchase 2 large, durable, quality banners to identify the Sportspark during those
times when special events are not being conducted. Please note these entry walls are
landscaped and illuminated.
$500.00
i~
ii
Elm Creek Parking Lot Surfacing
Increased use of this park has resulted in numerous potholes within both the west and
south parking areas. Staff would like to pave these parking areas, identify handicapped
parking pads, and decrease man hours continuing to be allocated for maintenance of the
current surface.
TOTAL
$8,000.00
$12,000.00
MEMORAN~~JM
TO: RODNEY J RAY - CITY MANAGER
SHERRY BISHOP - FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: BOB ALLEN
FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: CARRY-OVER BUDGET
DATE : September 20, 1995
BACKGROUND:
The unencumbered funds listed below are due to anticipating revenue short-fall
for FY 94-95. In January 1995 the Fire Department was made aware of the decrease
in sales tax. Therefore, the Fire Department delayed purchasing capital outlay
items and maintenance services until FY 95-96.
The following is a proposed use of the funds requested.
REOONN~NDATIONS:
CAPITAL OUTLAY $11,245.00
We ordered fire fighting equipment for Engine-2 last FY. Some of the items
ordered did not ship until after FY 94-95 budget year was closed. In order not
to create a hardsh i p on th i s years budget , we are requesting funds be carry-over .
Chief Fire & Safety $3,940.00
Accurate Fire Equipment 160.00
Casco Fire Equipment 320.00
Presently we have six (6) hand held radios that are in need of replacement. We
are requesting to purchase the radios this FY.
Hand held radios $6,825.00
UNIFORMS $3,600.00
The union contract was not settled until after FY 95-96 budget was approved.
Funds were not budgeted for additional uniforms, as stated in the contract, for
this budget year.
~oRalvDUM
TO: Sherry Bishop
FROM: F. Robert Carr
Public Works Director
SU$TECT: CARRYOVER BUDGET REQUESTS
DATE: September 1, 1995
Proposed items for carryover from the FY 94-95 Budget are presented on the attached sheets.
A summary of these items is as follows:
Engineering
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQiJIPMENT
Account Number: 51-170-5441
Computer Software Proposed carryover budget: $5,700.00
CemeterX
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQiJIPMENT
Account Number: 51-230-5441
Riding mower Proposed carryover budget: $2,400.00
Public Works Department
Engineering
Carryover Budget Proposal
FY 1994-95
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
Account Number: 51-170-5441
Proposed carryover budget: $5,700.00
FY 1994-95 line item budget: $5,700.00
FY 1994-95 YTD actual: $0.00
FY 1994-95 unencumbered: $5,700.00
Commentary:
Water Distribution System Modeling Softwaze: An objective in the capital plan is to expand the
present computer system with more software that will enable Engineering to perform additional
engineering design functions. A specific program pertaining to water distribution system
modeling is included in the 10-yeaz capital budget.
The model proposed is CYBERNET, available from Heastad Methods, which has the capability
to import data from the KYPIPE model presently administered by INCOG. The city does not
own a copy of the softwaze; therefore, updates to the information aze performed by INCOG.
Data pertaining to water flow and pressure conditions are evaluated for each new subdivision
prior to completion of the construction plans and approval of the final plat by Council. INCOG
chazges the city a rate of $45 per hour for the manhours associated with these evaluations. A
tabulation of the hours spent in FY94-95 indicates that 27 manhours (equating to $1,215) was
spent on water model related activities. Carryover budget funds can be applied to the purchase
of the water model software, which will enable the city to perform distribution system analyses
as needed in our own offices.
The program softwaze fora 1000 pipe network can be purchased directly from the vendor with
graphics and mapping abilities for approximately $2,000.
Computer Design Softwaze: Along-term objective in the capital plan is to expand the present
computer system with more software that will enable Engineering to perform additional
engineering design functions. Specific programs were included in the FY94-95 budget, but, due
to change-over of personnel, it was not possible to evaluate the best long-term needs of the
division. The Carryover Budget from FY93-94 included $2,700 for softwaze. Since no
expenditures were made using these funds, staff proposes to carry the remaining budget amount
in this budget. Total design software amount carried forward is $3,700.00
Public Works Department
~ Cemetery
Carryover Budget Proposal
FY 199495
Line Item: MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
Account Number: 51-230-5441
' Proposed carryover budget: $2,400.00
FY 1994-951ine item budget: $600.00
' FY 1994-95 YTD actual: $0.00
FY 199495 unencumbered: $600.00
Commentary:
~ The FY 94-95 budget included funds for repairs to the 1988 Deutz-Allis riding lawn mower. It
was anticipated that mower deck would need replacement, however, those repairs were not
' needed at that time. Since the end of FY94-95, the mower has exhibited increased signs of
engine failure and the need for a new mower deck. Estimated costs of these repairs is
approximately $1,500.00. Although mowing at the Cemetery has been greatly reduced using the
' Gravely mower that was purchased in 1994, the inability of this mower to move between
headstones and around other obstructions requires Public Works personnel to mow and weedeat
a significant area of the grounds. Replacement of the failing 7-year old mower is determined to
~ be cost-effective. The cost of a new mower is approximately $3,000.00. The FY95-96 Budget
includes $600.00 for the mower deck replacement; therefore the proposed carryover budget is
for $2,400.00.
MEMORANDUM
TO: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
FROM: SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CARRYOVER BUDGET REQUEST
DATE: October 1, 1995
After the year-end closing, the finance department FY 95 budget had an unencumbered balance
(excluding the personal services category) of $5,233.32. A carryover budget supplement of
$3, 800 is requested.
Carry-over budget funds are requested for the following:
• A locking storage cabinet for payroll reports, a lateral file cabinet (for either purchase
orders or personnel records), bookcases for notebooks and reference manuals (for
personnel and risk management), and additional storage shelving for utility billing
records and other computer printouts. Amount requested: $800.
• Increase the budget for staff training. Our expectations of the personnel division has
changed from simply processing payroll and benefits. They are expected to manage the
hiring process, wellness programs, due process and disciplinary procedures, and contract
grievances. In order for staff to be knowledgeable in these areas, we must invest in their
education. Additionally, the treasury/cash management function has been neglected for
many years because our cash reserves were too small to matter. As the budget grows
and Owasso grows, the knowledge of effective cash management becomes more
important every day. At fiscal year end, the City and OPWA combined had cash and
investments totaling $2.9 million. Amount requested: $1,000.
• Future computer equipment purchases. No computer equipment purchases will be made
until after the study committee has completed its report and recommendations. It is
anticipated that these funds will remain in the budget and be requested to carry over
again to FY 1997. Amount requested $2,000.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MS SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR CARRY OVER BUDGET
DATE: October 6, 1995
The following item is being requested by the Community Development Department to be funded
through the carry over budget process. It is my understanding that the Community Development
~ Budget has a carry over of 4,498.31 from FY 94-95, from which staff is requesting $3,000.00.
' Video Camera
This item has been a previously budgeted item in previous years but has never been
purchased. The City of Owasso currently does not have ,video production equipment
' outside of the police patrol units. As the culture continues to move toward a video
dominated format, the demand for video documentation of different scenarios is needed.
Not only would this item be beneficial for use within the Code Enforcement division, it
~ could also be utilized by the Owasso Economic Development Authority, the Owasso
Police Department, the Owasso Recycle Center, programs for the Owasso Recreation
Center, Subdivision Infrastructure Inspections, the monitoring of drainage concern areas
etc. Currently, whenever a video camera is needed for any city purpose, it must be
~ borrowed from individual staff members.
Total Amount Requested $3,000.00
~o~vnuM
TO: Sherry Bishop
Finance Director
FROM: F. Robert Carr, Jr., P.E.
Public Works Director ~_
SUBJECT: FY95-96 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION
DATE: July 20, 1995
Public Works has closed the following purchase orders for FY94-95 and has requested they be
reopened for FY95-96 since they were not completed. A supplemental appropriation in the
FY95-96 budget will be needed.
Vendor
Beeline Traffic Control
Clifford Power Systems
FHC, Inc.
Hammond Engineering, Inc.
Memory systems
P
Signalization - 96th/Garnett
Ator/Service Road lift station generators
Wastewater Treatment Plant engineering
design services
Survey Hale Acres drainage
CADD plotter cover
Amount
$12,784.00
$28,880.00
$140,360.00
$4,155.00
$40.00
Sack & Associates, Inc. Water, sewer and roadway engineering design $15,441.00
for NSP
If you need additional documentation or details, please advise.
MEMOR~vnvM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
' FROM: RODNEY J. RAY, CITY MANAGER
~ SUBJECT: REQUEST TO ALLOW ACARRY-OVER BUDGET
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1993
•BACKGROUND
' Historically, one of the methods used in determining departmental appropriations has been to
~ benchmark new budget appropriations against the previous years expenditures. This
philosophy generally resulted in the departmental attitude of "spend it or lose it". In an
effort to encourage sound budget management practices, the staff has determined that a
carry-over budget would be consistent with the current management philosophy that
encourages new and innovative ideas.
If department directors knew their savings would be available for use in a subsequent budget
year, I believe it would help to promote not only some increased efficiencies, but also some
long-range planning by departments based on their ability. to save money over amulti-year
time period for planned, large expenditures.
Initially, we thought about developing a long, detailed policy relating to this cany-over
budget request. However, after several meetings with staff, it has been determined that the
~ best approach is to ask the Council to allow the budget process to include carry-over funds
effective with the next budget (FY '93-'94). Carry-over funding requests could be in the
form of a request for a specific expenditure or could simply be shown as a "savings" for a
future, planned purchase.. Regardless of how it is listed, all budget items still require
justification to the City Manager and approval by the City Council.
In seeking ways to promote more responsible and accountable top level management, I
believe this approach will produce substantial results that are immediate in nature. If you
have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact Sherry Bishop or me.
RECOMNIF:NDATION
~ Staff recommends Council approval of the carry-over budget practice effective with the FY
1993-94 budget process.
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 515
DATE: October 10, 1995
' BACKGROUND:
At the October 3, 1995 meeting, the Owasso City Council recommended approval of a rezoning
request from AG (Agriculture) to RE (Residential Estates), RS-2 (Residential Single-Family
Medium Density), RS-3 (Residential Single-Family High Density), RD (Residential Duplex), OL
(Office Light), and CS (Commercial Shopping Center) on an approximate 344 acre parcel of
' land located within Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14 East; further described as a
majority of the undeveloped land located between E. 76th Street North and E. 86th Street North
and N. 129th E. Avenue and N. 145th E. Avenue. A subject map is attached for your
information and review.
Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 515 which formally adopts the City Council's rezoning
action of October 3, 1995.
~ RECOMMENDATION:
~ Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 515.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Subject map
2. Ordinance No. 515
,. E Zoning Exhibit
Owasso Land
T
m A Pert of 8ectlon 28,
" TownsFip 21 North Fienpe 14 East Visa County. Oklahoma LI Ld~
for
~~au~ uao Kaiser Francis OII Company
8
~~ ,~
~ ~"rs - ~ I
CITY OF OWASSO
ORDINANCE NO. 515
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING APPLICATION NUMBER
OZ-95-OS CHANGING THE ZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
A PORTION OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST,
TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) TO RE
(RESIDENTIAL ESTATES), RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
MEDIUM DENSITY), RS-3 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HIGH
DENSTTY), RD (RESIDENTIAL DUPLE, OL (OFFICE LIGHT), AND
CS (COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER), AND REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS, public heazings have been held regazding the request for rezoning of the
property herein described, and,
WHEREAS, the Owasso City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Owasso Planning Commission and all statements for and against the requested rezoning of
application OZ-95-O5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, THAT
Section 1. The zoning classification of the following described property, to
wit:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14
East, thence North 89°59'46" West for a distance of 500.00 feet to the Point of
Be ig nnin~ thence North 89°59'46" West for a distance of 820.52 feet; thence North
0°10'22" East for a distance of 2640.24 feet; thence South 89°50'35" East for a
distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 59°18'29" East for a distance of 850.00 feet;
thence North 20°46'44" East for a distance of 750.22 feet; thence South 0°15'50"
West for a distance of 1138.62 feet; thence South 0°13'27" West for a distance of
2237.02 feet; thence North 89°59'46" West for a distance of 500.00 feet; thence
South 0° 13'27" West for a distance of 400.00 feet to the Point of Beginnine. Said
area containing 83.86 acres more or less,
AND
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14 East,
thence North 89°59'46" West for a distance of 500.00 feet; thence North 0°13'27"
East for a distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 89°59'46" East for a distance of
500.00 feet, thence South 0°13'27" West for a distance of 400.00 feet to the Point of
Be ig nnin~ Said area containing 4.59 acres more or less,
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to RE (Residential Estates)
District.
AND
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28,
Township 21 North, Range 14 East, thence South 89°51'21" East for a distance of
1730.01 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence due north for a distance of 1805.57
feet; thence North 28°46'32" West for a distance of 331.00 feet; thence South
89°44'53" East for a distance of 1080.45 feet; thence South 0°07'18" West for a
distance of 771.54 feet; thence South 89°47'03" East for a distance of 1324.05 feet;
thence North 0°10'22" East for a distance of 1319.96 feet; thence South 89°42'44"
East for a distance of 777.06 feet; thence South 0°15'50" West for a distance of
400.00 feet; thence South 89°42'44" East for a distance of 550.00 feet; thence South
0°15'50" West for a distance of 1100.00 feet; thence South 20°46'44" West for a
distance of 750.00 feet; thence South 59°18'29" West for a distance of 850.00 feet;
thence North 89°50'35" West for a distance of 2569.52 feet to the Point of
Beginning Said area containing 151.74 acres more or less,
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to a RS-2 (Residential
Single-Family Medium Density) District.
AND
Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 'r
21 North, Range 14 East, thence due North for a distance of 1324.96 feet; thence
South 89°42'44" East for a distance of 1730.02 feet; thence due South for a distance
of 1320.62; thence North 89°50'35" West along the Center Section Line of Section
28, for a distance of 1730.01 feet to the Point of Be ig nning, Said azea containing
52.58 acres, more or less,
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to a RS-3 (Residential
Single-Family High Density) District.
AND
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14
East, thence due South for a distance of 940.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence
South 89°42'44" East for a distance of 1730.02 feet; thence due South for a distance
of 384.95 feet; thence North 89°42'44" West for a distance of 1730.02 feet; thence
due North for a distance of 384.96 feet to the Point of Beginning, Said azea
containing 15.24 acres more or less, 'I'
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to a RD (Residential
Duplex) District.
AND
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14 East,
thence South O1 ° 15'50" West for a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 89°42'44"
West for a distance of 550.00 feet; thence North 0°15'50" East for a distance of
400.00 feet; thence South 89°42'44" East for a distance of 550.00 feet to the Point of
Beginning, Said area containing 5.05 acres more or less,
AND
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14 ,
East, thence South 89°42'44" East along said section line a distance of 1350.00 feet
to the Point of Be ig nning; Thence continuing along said Section line South 89°42'44"
East a distance of 1302.30 feet; thence South 00°07'18" West for a distance of '
550.00 feet; thence North 89°44'53" West for a distance of 1080.45 feet; thence
North 28°46'32" West for a distance of 458.40 feet to the Point of Beginning,. Said
azea containing 15.43 acres more or less,
^
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to OL (Office Light)
District.
AND
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 28, Township 21 North, Range 14 East,
thence South 89°42'44" East along said section line a distance of 750.00 feet; thence '
due South for a distance of 940.00 feet; thence North 89°42'44" West for a distance
of 750.01 feet; thence due North along the West section line of Section 28 for a
distance of 940.00 feet to the Point of Be inning, Said area containing 16.22 acres
more or less,
be, and the same is hereby rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to a CS (Commercial
Shopping Center) District.
Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and
the same are hereby expressly repealed.
1
PASSED AND APPROVED this 17th day of October, 1995.
~ City of Owasso, Oklahoma
ii
ATTEST:
Charles L. Burris, Mayor
ii
ii
Marcia Boutwell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ronald D. Cates, City Attorney
r
' MEMORANDUM
' TO:
FROM:
' SUBJECT:
' DATE:
BACKGROUND:
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
REZONING REQUEST OZ-95-07
October 12, 1995
Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, applicant and owner, has requested rezoning of a 16.90 acre tract
from AG (Agriculture) to CS (Commercial Shopping Center). A copy of the complete staff
report is attached for your information and review and includes subject maps. It should be noted
^ that the application does not include zoning which would permit apartments outright.
The subject tract formerly included a request for RM-1 zoning which was denied by the Planning
Commission. Prior to the item being appealed to the Council level, 'the applicant amended their
~ request on the parcel, requesting a CS (Commercial Shopping Center) zoning. Because the CS
zoning being requested is of a higher intensity than the RM-l, the applicant was required to go
through the public hearing process again at the Planning Commission level prior to Council
action.
At that meeting, staff recommended a modified approval of the applicants request. In the
extreme southeast corner of the subject property, a conflict existed as the applicants requested
CS zoning would be abutting previously approved RS-2 (Residential Single-Family Medium
Density) zoning. As you are aware, staff and Planning Commission policy is to not encourage
the development of commercial zoning immediately adjacent to residential.
Upon reviewing the application, staff recommended the incorporation of an OL (Office Light)
zoning at the southeast corner of the subject property. The area falls within a natural drainage
area on the property and is likely to be utilized for a detention pond, however the rezoning to
' OL would insure that a buffer would be in place if it should not develop as a detention area.
A "down zoning" to OL would be permitted without an additional public hearing as it is of a
_ lower intensity than CS.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their October 10, 1995 regular meeting and
unanimously approved the rezoning request with the inclusion of the OL buffer. No objections
to the rezoning request were presented at that hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request from Kaiser-Francis Oil Company to rezone
the subject property from AG (Agriculture) to CS (Commercial Shopping Center) with an OL
(Office Light) buffer as indicated on "Exhibit A" within the staff report.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. OZ-95-07 Staff Report.
CITY OF OWASSO
Planning Department
OZ-95-07
Staff Report
Timothy D. Rooney -Community Development Director
BACKGROUND
~ APPLICANT AND STATUS OF APPLICANT: Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, applicant
and owner.
S RE UESTED ACTION AND PURPOSE: Are nest for the rezonin of ro ert from
Q 4 g P P Y
~ AG (Agricultural) to CS (Commercial Shopping Center).
LOCATION AND SIZE: The property is generally located east of the southeast corner of
N. 129th E. Avenue and E. 86th Street North, due southeast of the Owasso High School and
contains approximately 16.90 acres, more or less. A complete copy of the legal description
is attached for your information and review.
EXISTING LAND USE: The subject property is currently undeveloped.
' SURROUNDING LAND USE: The subject property is abutted on the north by E. 86th
Street North, while further north lies the Owasso High School. The subject property is
bordered on the east by undeveloped property zoned OL (Office Light), on the southeast by
undeveloped property zoned RS-2 (Residential Single-Family Medium Density), on the south
by undeveloped property zoned RD (Residential Duplex) and on the west by undeveloped
property zoned CS (Commercial Shopping Center). Please note that these zoning were
°'' unanimously approved by the Owasso City Council on October 3, 1995 and will not actually
be applied to the property until 30 days after the publication of the Ordinance containing the
rezoning action.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The Zoning Code for the City of Owasso, Chapter 15
"Amendments", Chapter 5 "Office District Provisions", and Chapter 6 "Commercial District
Provisions".
SITE INFORMATION: No unusual development hardships are noted.
Staff Report
OZ-95-07
Page 2 of 4
ANALYSIS
The proposed rezoning, if approved, would create an additional 16.9 acres of CS
(Commercial Shopping Center) zoning at the southeast corner of E. 86th Street North and N.
129th E. Avenue, bringing the total amount of commercial zoning at this corner to
approximately 33 acres.
The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Owasso defines the corner of E. 86th Street North
and N. 129th E. Avenue as an area fora "Type Two Activity Center" located at the
intersections of primary arterial streets. A "Type Two Activity Center" is forty (40) acres, '
ten (10) acres distributed to each corner. While it can certainly be determined that the
applicants request is larger than what the Comprehensive Plan deems appropriate, it is not
inconsistent with that which is found on the southwest and northwest corners of E. 86th '
Street North and N. 129th E. Avenue, and is comparable in size to those areas. The
northwest corner of E. 86th Street North and N. 129th E. Avenue contains a total of 15 ~
acres of CS zoning or PUD zoning for commercial development and the southwest corner
contains approximately 20 acres of CG zoning (a higher intensity than CS).
The conflict with the comprehensive plan occurs not at the corner of E. 86th Street North, ,
but rather farther east of the intersection. While the plan does not have a calling for
commercial zoning at that location, it may be outdated when one considers past development ~
trends along E. 86th Street North between Highway 169 and N. 129th E. Avenue. A total of
over 1,000 feet of linear frontage of various forms of commercial zoning are present along
the south side of E. 86th Street North (not including the area at the southwest corner of N.
129th E. Avenue and E. 86th Street North previously described above). The north side of E. ,r
86th Street North, between Highway 169 and N. 129th E. Avenue contains over 600 feet of
linear frontage of commercial zoning (not including the area at the northwest corner of N. '
129th E. Avenue and E. 86th Street North previously described above). Clearly, the need
and desire for additional commercial zoning along this corridor has resulted in diversion
from the Comprehensive Plan. ~
While staff has some minor reservations about creating 33 acres of commercial zoning, when
one views the past development trend and apparent need for more than what the
Comprehensive Plan had designated commercially, the applicant's request seems to be in ^
compliance with the development pattern which has occurred. In fact, a point could be made
that with a larger, more uniform tract of commercial zoning being created, a strip center may
be avoided and a commercial activity center (i.e. Utica Square) could be a more attractive
end result.
Staff Report
OZ-95-07
~ Page 3 of 4
Because of the amount of commercial zoning that would be created, platting and site plan
review of any proposed use will be key steps in the development process of the eastern most
16 acres. Careful attention will need to be given to insure both a pedestrian and vehicular
interaction between the uses, interaction that will not "cut-off" the southern portions of the
subject site and create a line of commercial businesses and a vast area of commercial
property with little development potential.
Staff has a concern, however, with the southeastern portion of the 16 acre tract being
requested for commercial zoning. A policy has been made by staff, and has also been
"adopted" by the Planning Commission and Council iu previous meetings, that commercial
zoning should not abut residential zoning. Clearly, there is an area along the southeast
boundaries of the zoning request which would be in conflict with this policy.
Staff is proposing a solution to the above conflict. The alternative would be to reduce the
extreme southeast corner to OL (Office Light) zoning as indicated on the attached "Exhibit
A" zoning map. This would eliminate any conflict between commercial and residential uses
by means of a buffer zoning and development. This proposal would also fall in line with the
natural drainage pattern in the area and also allow for the development of a detention area to
serve this portion of the entire project. CS zoning would be reduced to 15.95 acres, while
.95 acres of OL zoning would be added to the existing 15.43 acres to the east.
When staff reviews the alternative developed, it would be staff's recommendation that the
incorporation of an OL zoning would be a desirable solution to the identified problem of
supplying an adequate buffer.
COMMENTS
Staff received numerous calls and visits regarding the initial zoning request for this parcel
when it included RM-1 (Residential Multi-Family Low Density) zoning. However, since the
removal of that request, the approval of the zoning request on the remainder of the Kaiser-
Francis property, and the request for CS (Commercial Shopping Center) zoning on this
property, staff has received little comment. The Council does need to be aware that there is
likely to be some opposition to the commercial zoning request, as the few comments received
seem to be concerned that the applicant is requesting CS zoning in order to be able to obtain
a multi-family development through the Board of Adjustment and therefore "coming through
the back door. " Staff has pointed out that apartments would be permitted in CS zoning via a
Special Exception through the Board of Adjustment, however staff has also pointed out that
the public backlash against such a request would also be substantial as it was before the
Planning Commission. There was no opposing comments to the rezoning request presented
at the Planning Commission meeting on October 10, 1995.
Staff Report '
OZ-95-07
Page 4 of 4 ~
Letters were sent to property owners within 300' of the subject property and notification was ~
published in the Owasso Reporter on September 21, 1995 and a rezoning sign was posted on
the subject property. A copy of the letter sent to property owners and the legal
advertisement are also attached for your information and review. A neighborhood group was
formed regarding the original rezoning request and staff has kept this group informed. ,~
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that a buffer of OL zoning be incorporated into the CS zoning
request, as indicated on "Exhibit A" within the staff report.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Case map
2. Legal description of subject property
3. Exhibit A -first alternative
4. Copy of letter sent to surrounding property owners.
5. Copy of notification published in the Owasso Reporter.
R ,. E Zoning Exhibit
cnsr mTM sa,m of
7 Owasso Land ~
Z
~' A Part of Section 28, ~'
" TownsFilp 2t North, Ranpe 14 East, Tulsa County, Oklahoma '~:~, ~.r~
for ~I I~
'" Kaiser Francis Ofl Company
~~~ae~
~ ~
~ ~~
s,
OWd.S50 SI', ~ SGWOI Zonhg - AG ,rTm « 6trM Ti
730.00 ~x3zso' Ea,tt 86N t4wt NaN a' swwn aavaa £
t „P{7M' E
m,wo [7' :
Nw n,r b8
g ~,~ OL ~~
CS ~ '"
SUBJECT ,000.{3•
~ staws~'E g~ a~
TRACT •& ~ s
730.01•
tYaY{{' M N q'{Y{{' W L~
RD ~ ~~
RS-3
RS-2
ZoNng - AG
rt~ar. ¢¢ ^'
6~ ~ Y K
OL
330.00
t tY{2'{{' [
X14
Copper Meadows
Zoning - RS~3
b
6
h
Graceland Acres
ZoNng - RE
I~ I Blo~k 4
ai.-
..a.,vr
~ rv me craw m
~. _ - - - _-___ _----__ ----_- _- _,r .._ ,.
..o+, ..o. ,.,. ..a<,.,.
Eoat 76th Slr«t North s ~
/:
t~
~ ZoNng - RE.
6
RE
J
K ~--_-i
R ~. E Zoning Exhibit
cnsr mn~ same
Of
r Owasso Land
21 A Part of Section 28,
" Township 21 North, Range 14 East, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
for
T '" S'"EEr Kaiser Francis Oil Company
Lo4coei,~on M°p
4
~ ~~ ~
Owasso Sr. Hgft School Zonhg - AG ~* a. ''a sa..t gs,
r rata ~.,,
7 ~%StJO' Eoet E6th StrNt North
4 ^ e• swswer sera
~ -+~----rt- --r
t er4Y44' E
~ OL ~~
CS WF
RD
RS-3
W
p5
N
Z
Copper Meadows
Zoning - RS~3
RS-2
"EXHIBIT A'' `~
.6
~ ,~
~~~ ~
Zoning - AG
rS77.Qf' w%
~g 8
• ~~ ~
~~ OL ~ s
~.~• ~
3 00'{2'{4' [
g ~
g
e~
~_
¥~ ~
~ Y~i
sx .r
k
N ob
n ~
~ ~,~ 4
~ ~ ~ I
330.47
09 JY W w
y~
Sj~,
a!
RE g~
a
~1
6
N
Graceland Acres
ZoNng - F2E
,r. l-J ~ I I I B7odk 4 ~ Acres
Ead 76th Street North
rb
b
y
ZoNng - RE
•
iy ~ti
- --
a e p
~' !1
207 South Cedar
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER
OZ-95-07
(918) 272-2251
FAX (918) 272-4999
~ Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Owasso Planning
Commission in the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma at 7:00
PM on the 10th day of October, 1995. At that time and place, the Owasso Planning
Commission will consider a request from Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, applicant, for a
proposed change of the zoning classification from an AG (Agriculture) District to CS
(Commercial Shopping Center). The subject property is described as follows:
~ COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 21
NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST, THENCE SOUTH 89°42'44" EAST ALONG SAID SECTION
LINE A DISTANCE OF 750.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89°42'44" EAST FOR A
~ DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE DUE SOUTH FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.0
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°46'32" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 789.40 FEET;
THENCE DUE SOUTH FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89°42'44" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 980.01 FEET; THENCE DUE NORTH FOR A
DISTANCE OF 940.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID AREA
CONTAINING 16.90 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
The general location of the property is east of the southeast corner of E. 86th Street North
and N. 129th E. Avenue, Owasso, OK.
~ As an abutting or nearby property owner, you are being notified so that you may be able to
express your views or concerns regarding this request. If you are unable to attend this
' meeting, please forward any comments you may have in writing to the Owasso Community
Development Director, 207 S. Cedaz Street. These comments will be presented to the
Planning Commission members at the scheduled public heazing by Planning Staff.
Information and maps showing the property location may be inspected in the office of the
Community Development Director, 207 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma, 74055 or by
calling 272-2251. This is your only personal notification of this request.
Dated at Owasso, Oklahoma, this 18th day of September, 1995.
Sincerely,
~~-,nom' C~c~~
Timothy D. R ey
Community Development Directo
City of Owasso
RS-3
= Do~~
o,~cS
-- i~I`f
•s-~
/ \`
AG ~ ~
ownsso ~. ) BRFdVTW00D
S scH"aa ~ r` . .
ESTATES
' . .,,
AG
_ ~ .zo..
~ ~
~ '~ ~~ '
s
iw ~~~. r•
,'~ -
SUBJF~T
_ - - - - _ - - -- -PROPERTY
R S Puo-.P '
~ ~
.~ i ~ ~>-
44~`~s
c~~ ~
.,~~
RE
~srg sTR
R
R
'~
,.
~z
=o
~v
-~
~~ 1
.~
r
~ ~
r
~; ~
~~
,,
„,
~,
a
M
' A
Affida~•it Of Publication
STATE OF OIiLAlIOMA, TULSA COUNTY, ea:
Bill R. Ret}lerford, of lnw•ful age, being duly sworn
and authorized, says that he is the publisher of the
OWASSO REPORTER , a weekly
ne:+•spnper printed in the rity of OWASSO
atlsn Count}', Oianhomn, n ncµ•epnper qualified to
publish legal notices, advertisements and publications
ns provided in Section 1t~6 of Title 25, Oklahoma
Statutes 197] and 1983 ne amended, and iherenfler,
and complies with all other requirements of the laws
of Okln}tome with reference tc1 legal publications.
'flint said notice, t, true copy of µ•hich is attached
hereto, w•ns pubiis}ted in t}te resular edition of said
neµ•spnper during the period and time of publication
and not in n supplement, nn the following dates:
SEPTEI•IBER 21 ,199 5
~ ~
Subsmbed and sworn to before me this 21st
day Dr September .lgg 5
~- Notary Public
1,4y Commission expires:I~Iarch :20, 1997
PUBLISHER'S FEE X98. 13
Published In the Owasw Reposer, Owasw. Tuka County, Oklahoma,
September 21, 1995.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF A IiE11R1NG ON A
PROP06ED AMENOMEN7 TO THE 20NNG ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
APPLICATION: OZ_>13A7
Naive k hereby given that a public Merhp wit be held betas the Owac-
so Planning Commission, h the Owasso Community Cesar, Owasso,
Oklahonut, at 7:00 P.M. on the tali day d October, 1995.
At that time and place, consideration will be given to the proposed
charge d the zonhg daasffcation d the folowirq descibed poperty:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 26,
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST, THENCE SOUTH
89'4744' EAST ALONG SAID SECTION LINE A DISTANCE OF
750.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINU-
ING ALONG SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89.4744' EAST FOR A
DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE DUE SOUTH FORA DIS-
TANCE OF 150.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28.4G32' EAST FOR A
DISTANCE OF 789.40 FEET; THENCE DUE SOUTH FORA DIS-
TANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'4744• WEST FOR A
DISTANCE OF 980.01 FEET; THENCE DUE NORTH FORA DIS-
TANCE OF 940.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID
AREA CONTAINMIG 16.90 ACRES MOPE OR LESS.
The general location d the property is east d the southeast corner d E.
B6lh Street North and N. 129tlt E. Avenw, Owasso, OiC
To be oorrfdered k a change d tM underlykp zonhg from AG (ApricuE
tore) to CS (Corrrnwcial Shopping Center DstrkU.
Ali parsons kgerected N ihk matter may bs prewrn at the hearhg and
present their objet.Yiorx b or arguments for any a al d the above manerc.
M the want that such proposed rezonhg k aPDra'ed, h nAole a h pan,
by the Owacw Planning Commission, saki Plannhg Cammwbn shay sub-
mit ks recorrvnendation tithe City Council d the Cty d Owasw br is oon-
cideraticn and adbn, as provided by lav.
The Cpy Couneirs rwiew d the recortmerWalion of the Planning Com-
rrraslon on the proposed rezoning shall be at a mswing time and place to
be dgermined by the Council, saki IMOrmation to be available from the
Owrasso Community Dsrebprrom Dkeda.
A map showing t1w proposed rezoning aoconpaMec this notice. For
more fMOmtation on the proposed rezorrrq oorsaa Ute Owasw Communi-
ty DevektprtteM Departrnsrtt, city Hall, 207 S. Cedar, Owacw, Oklahoma
74055, a phone (916) 272.2251.
Dated ai Owasso. Okiahonta, thk 13th day d September, 1995.
Tirrothy D. Rooney
CommuMry Dsvebpnwrrt Diracta
t MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: TIMOTHY ROONEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: NUISANCE ABATEMENT
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 3, WINDSOR LAKE ADDITION
DATE: October 10, 1995
BACKGROUND:
~ Through a neighborhood meeting held in the Windsor Lake Addition in June, and follow up
activity performed by the Code Enforcement Officer - Mr. Ted McCord, it has come to the
attention of the City of Owasso that a large, dead tree is in existence on a shared property line
between Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Windsor Lake Addition, Owasso, Oklahoma. This tree has been
,~ deemed a nuisance by both Mr. McCord and the Office of the City Manager.
* Prior to a nuisance being abated by the City of Owasso, the City Manager must deem that a
nuisance is existing in its current state and the "responsible party" is notified via certified mail
that a nuisance exists and is given ten (10) days to remove said nuisance. The City Manager
' conducted this hearing on July 24, 1995, and the "responsible party" was contacted on August
2, 1995. Copies of this information are attached for your information and review.
Upon no action being taken by the "responsible party", the City Manager ordered a survey of
the property on which the tree is located in order to ascertain, for fact, the "responsible party. "
Three surveying companies were contacted via telephone to submit an estimate for performing
the survey. The only surveyor who responded was Mr. David Cantrell of Cantrell & Associates
Engineering and Surveying, who then performed the survey at a cost of $200.00.
The results of the survey indicated joint responsibility for the nuisance as 80% of the dead tree
is located on Lot 1, Block 3 and 20 % is located on Lot 2, Block 3. A copy of the survey
submitted by Mr. Cantrell, as well as an attached diagram indicating the exact location of the
tree, are also attached for your information and review.
Staff contacted three (3) tree service companies for estimates for the removal of the tree. The
lowest estimate submitted was by Tom Gill Tree Service at a cost of $1400. The estimates for
removal of the tree are attached for your information and review.
Because portions of the nuisance were located on the neighboring lot (Lot 2), staff then contacted ,
the record owner of that parcel to inform them of the survey result. The property owners of Lot
2, Ivlr. and Mrs. Douglas Waugh, were aware of the nuisance as they had brought that item to
the attention of the staff at the neighborhood meeting and through contact with the Code
Enforcement Officer. The Waugh's had previously stated that they would be in agreement to
paying for any portion of the abatement cost for which they would be responsible. A payment
agreement form was then drafted by staff for the Waugh's signature, providing for the billing
of the Waugh's for 20 % of all costs involved in the abatement of the nuisance or $320. The
Waugh's signed the agreement and are now awaiting the abatement of the nuisance. Both the
letter to the Waugh's, as well as the signed agreement, are attached for your information and
review.
While the City Manager has the authority to abate an existing nuisance, the cost involved in r
abating this nuisance requires Council approval. Staff is requesting City Council approval for
the amount of $1400 to Tom Gill Tree Service in order to abate the nuisance. Please be advised
that the survey bill has already been paid at this time and the City would eventually receive all
monies paid for the abatement of the nuisance. The Waugh's have agreed to pay $320, and the
remaining 80 % of the costs ($1280) will be filed as a lien on the other property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending Council approval in the amount of $1400 in order to abate the above
described nuisance.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice to Abate Nuisance
2. Abatement Hearing Disposition
3. Notice of Abatement Hearing Result ~•
4. Copy of the Survey performed by Cantrell & Associates ~
5. Copy of the Diagram submitted by Cantrell & Associates
6. Tree Removal Estimates
7. Copy of the Letter of Notification sent to the Waugh's.
8. Copy of the Agreement Between the City of Owasso and Mr. and Mrs. Douglas Waugh.
City of Owasso
207 South Cedar
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
(918) 272-2251
FAX (918) 272-4999
Certified Mail No. P 845 275 764 Date July 11, 1995
' Return Receipt Requested
NOTICE TO ABATE A NUISANCE
OR TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE
Pursuant to 11 O.S. 1984 Supp., Ordinance No. 28, City of Owasso "Code of
' Ordinances", you are hereby notified that the property owned by you located at 9506 N. 133rd
E. Ave., Owasso Oklahoma, has been determined unsafe and dangerous to such an extent that
said property is a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Owasso and requires
' the following:
Cut down and remove large dead tree in rear yard
Section 8-301-1 of the Owasso City Code
You are further notified that the above action must be completed on or before Friday,
July 21, 1995, or in the alternative you may appear before the Owasso Hearing Officer at the
Owasso City Hall on the 24th day of July, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. to show cause why such action
is not necessary or why additional time for performance may be necessary.
You are further notified that failure to take the required action or appear before the
Owasso Hearing Officer on the above date and show just cause may result in the performance
of the required action by the City of Owasso and the costs for the same become a lien against
said property. Should you have any questions, contact Ted McCord, Code Enforcement Officer
at 272-2251.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING AND POSTING
On the 11th day of July, 1995, I mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice
to Edwin Williams, 2328 Limreck Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
' Code Enforcement
9508.1
- h
~ SENDER: I also wish to receive the '
y Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. ~
• Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra ~
H • Print your name and address on the reverse of. form so that we can fee):
~ m return this card to you. m
~ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back 'rf space 1. ^ Addressee's Address ~
m
~ ~ does not permit. G
t • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ^ Restricted Delivery m
~ "' • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
j c delivered. Consult ostmaster for fee.
~ m . 3. Article Addressed to: ~ 4a. Article Number _ ~
m P 845 275 764
~ a ~' 4b. Service Type ~
~ E Edw1.T1 W~hatrts , + ~I Registered ^ Insured
~ - 2328"~Limreck ~~rive yK ~ C~.certified ^ COD"
~' ~ .Ta1l.ahassee `~"'FL 32308 ~ r -~: °' ,
w , ` tt w `{ Return Receipt for ~
" o ~ ~ ~-
~ ~.
- ^~"ExplEss:Mall ^,Merchandise ~ c:
~.F~ 7' ~OBte ell _ . ,,,, .
1 a ~ a~~.. ~~ 1995: - ~l
,... . ~ ;:
1 Z ~ 8. Addressee's Address (nn ly rf requested Y
y ~ 6 Si na a IA res" e)\
~ ~ and fee is paid) ~ ~Yy "~ _, ~
3 ~ 6. Signature (Agen t
~• ac FnPm 3871_`:December~1997..~.,,Iruus.cpo:fees--~~t+.:. DOMESTIC.RETURN,RECEIPT
J
. ~. ...
,, ..
r
P 845 275 764
Receipt for
Certified Mail
~~ No Insurance Coverage Provided
uwTEO n~TES Do not use for International Mail
POST/~L SERVICE
(See Reversel
-.... .. c. .. .. s ~S ~ zac..~ c
i
Sent to
w' W'
SVeetand No.
P.O., State and ZIP Code
Tallahassee
FL 32308
Postage Q
~P .32
Certified Fee
1.10
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Aatum Receipt Showing
to Whom & Date Delivered
Return Receipt Shovring to Whom,
Date, end Addressee's Address
1.10
TOTAL Postage
~ Fees
$ 2.52
Postmark or Date
i
,~ CITY OF OWASSO
~' ABATEMENT HEARING
DATE: July 24, 1995 PERSONS PRESENT: Rodney Ray
NAME: Edwin Williams Ted McCord
Marsha Hensley
CASE NO: 95-08
~„ Infraction pursuant to 11 O.S. 1984 Supp., Ordinance No. 332, Part
8-101, City of Owasso "Code of Ordinances: Cut down and remove
,~ large dead tree in rear yard.
Response:
Hearing Officer Dispositi n: J~
" Heari~ig j~er~-~i ature
9508.2
City of Owasso
207 South Cedar
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
August 2, 1995
Edwin Williams
2328 Limreck Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32308
RE: 9506 N. 133rd E. Ave., Owasso, Oklahoma
(918) 272-2251
FAX (918) 272-4999
Certified Mail No. P 845 275 754 Return Receipt Requested
Dear Mr. Williams:
The purpose of this correspondence is to notify you that on July 24, 1995, the
Owasso City Manager, after conducting a hearing on the matter, declared the
property referenced above detrimental to the health, benefit and welfare of the
public and the community.
The City Manager further ordered that the dead tree in the rear year be cut down
and removed.
This is an abatement order. According to Section 8, Chapter 1, Article A, Sub
Section 104, you have ten (101 days in which to abate the unlawful condition or
the City will move to clean the property.
In the event you fail to take steps that will abate the above described
conditions, the City will cause the dead tree to be cut down and removed.
If such work is completed by the City or its agent, all costs will be itemized
and will be billed to you.
If the total cost of the work performed is not paid within thirty (30) days from
the date of the mailing of the itemized statement, the Owasso City Clerk shall
forward a certified statement to the Tulsa County Treasurer in order for that
amount to be levied against the property and collected in the manner prescribed
by state law.
You may appeal this Abatement Order to the City Council by filing written notice
with the City Clerk no longer than ten days after the hearing date above.
Your attention to this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
/~~! I ~
Ted McCord
Code Enforcement Officer
TM:mh
9508.3
....
t•
°' SENDER: '
v
y • Complete items .t.and/oi
y • Complete items 3, and 4
i ~ • Print your name and add
~ return this card to you.
m • Attach this form to the 1
~ does not permit.
s • Write "Return Receipt Rey
"' • The Return Receipt will sF
~ delivered.
v 3. Article Addressed
m ,
a
the '
fXtfB V .
~.•mj
9SS . `~ ~
•.%.~
m
V F
m:
c.
...: .. ;.
..
l
P 845 275 754
Receipt for
Certified Mail
,~, No Insurance Coverage Provided
,,,,~!~ Do not use for International Mail
rO5TAE 5E0.VKE (See Reverse)
SeMi~Wlil VJ1.lllaill.S
Street end No.
2328 Lock Drive
P.o.. State and ZIP Code ~ 32308
Tallahassee,
Postage
Certified Fee ~ ~ n
r,
.......n ,r - - ._. -. -__.. ..~.._.,
CANTRELL ~ ASSOCIATES
Engineering & Surveying
202 E. Second, Suite 110
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055
9-1-95
MEMO:
TO: CITY OF OWASSO.
.r
THE TREE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTYY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2 BLOCK ~
3 WINDSOR LAKE SUBDIVISION IS APPROXIMATELY 80% ON LOT 1 AND 20% ON
LOT 2. THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOT 1 AND 2 HAS BEEN STAKED AND A
NAIL SET IN THE TREE ON THE PROPERTY LINE.
AVID CANTRELL RLS #351
a~
~ a~~ ,
(36+65.2 ~ ~ ~~'
27.`~ lT~ 18 ~
8
7
I 1
~ ;
I '
'
6
I '
w~
~~
~~
o.
~~
~,
BLOCK;
rr- '
I ~
~ ~
15' B/L & U/E
5
~ ,
~_ 51
~~~;-
o -~,~ ~.
~\
~\
`~ ~
\ ~•
22 ~ ~~
\,
__~`
2Q2 E~Sr 2nd, SUI 11
-;- OWAS80;,OK ~y{p ~
- ~ ~.,
-~ ~.
~~
' ~~
~~ ,
~a .a ,.
/, ~/
(1~ 0~ %
_` / ~
~~'V ~ lfw
~.Sn,'ai
70
~ ,.- ~ I S ~_.....
~ (L7 N 7 JV /4'~ L
~rp,~~~ N T~E~
~ ~ ~ 5 SG~oP~RT y ~~L
~i
~ 7'~~L- /S y~~~/Zd~ 8c %~
m ~~r~,~ t y 0 ~7 oT
,.
~i
3
I
~w
I~ I
' • so
3 '~
~~
'~ I
'~ 17
15' B/L & U/E ~~ I
~~ ~
.. ~ ~`
1
,,
4 ~ '
~, ~
~4~
L__
k 4c
T-
~ ,
,~ ,
~'~ X ~ ~z -- ~ X97`
Johnny HammonS
Tree Service
SIaItAXING
m~IMMIIV'G • TAKI1 nOWT~'
918.834~Q57~ Tulsa, Okfa, 74115
~~ ~ ~S
M
~~
.~~~~~~/ D1ri4lZ moo;-` vev ~/P~~-____
o~
p;i~
Taylor Tree Care,
5706 East T 11th St. So. ,
Tulsa, Ok. 74137
(9i $) 299-8200
FAX # (9i 8) 299-0038
September, i E, 1995
City of Owasso,
FAX# 272-4997
Attn : h~{arsha Hensley
Estimate to remove one extremely dead Cottonwood t-°ee, trunk pieces
debris and cut trunk off to grade level.
Total price: $ i , 600.00
Since this tree is extremely fragile and unsafe, we will need to use our 55' reach
bucket truck and Crane. in the backyard.
We will provide Workmans Comp and insurance certificate if successful.
Terms: Net on Completion of joE~.
Thank ou,
Ge~ ne Taylor
GT /bt
_..
a
~j o ~1 G-i ti~ x.1.2. Q.~h~3
TC 5803
252~~
..~.
1
' ' KEEP THIS SLIP FOR REFERENCE
City of Owasso
207 South Cedar
PO Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
September 18, 1995
Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Waugh
9410 N. 133rd E. Ave.
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055
RE: Nuisance Abatement
9410 No. 133rd E. Ave., Lot 2, Block 3, Windsor Lake Addition
9506 No. 133rd E. Ave., Lot 1, Block 3, Windsor Lake Addition
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Waugh:
(918) 272-2251
FAX (918) 272-4999
The purpose of this letter is to follow up recent conversations regarding the large dead tree
located on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Windsor Lake Addition, an Addition to the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma.
As I informed you previously, the City Manager has deemed the large dead tree to be a
~ nuisance, as it does meet the nuisance specifically as defined in the Owasso City Code.
After no abatement actions were taken by the assumed property owner, the City Manager
' ordered a survey of the property in which the tree is located to determine full or partial
responsibility. This task was accomplished by Cantrell & Associates of Owasso.
The results of the survey indicate that 80% of the tree is located on Lot 1, Block 3; while
20 % is located on Lot 2, Block 3 (your property).
' In order for the abatement process to continue, I am requesting your signature on the
enclosed payment agreement form. Your signature on this form indicates that you are in full
understanding that you will be responsible for no more that 20% of the costs involved in the
^ abatement of the nuisance.
Please return the form to the City of Owasso, Attn: Ted McCord, P. O. Box 180, Owasso,
Oklahoma, 74055 as soon as possible so that the abatement process may continue.
If you have any questions or if I can be of additional assistance to you, please don't hesitate
to contact me at 272-2251.
Sincerely,
Ted McCord
^ Code Enforcement
SENDER: - -- ; --- - -- -- ..~_
q • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
1 m • Complete items 3, and 4a & b.
~ • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can
~ return this card to you.
y • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or o he back if space
" does not permit.
!, Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
3...Article Addressed to: 4a: Art
~ _ ~~
-- 1 u ~• &~~Mrs Waugh '`~.~ "'; ~~q tin\ . 4b. Ser
- ; " 9410 'N:h133i~i E y~ ' y~ ^ Regi
. ... r ~ .tt Ave ,~ ~ ¢
" ~ '~ ' Certi
1 ~ Owasso, -OK 74055: ;`~ ^ Ezpc
~ ,~.
c 9 ~ ~ ate
~':
~ ~• ' I Addressee) ,~~ 8. ~~Addr
~ _ ~ ~~ ~-and 1
,l cWC 6 ~ture Agent^,~ "., xi ~~
I ~. z a 7 ~
~ ~ PS Form 381;1,,December~,1,991 -irus.~po:»~a3--3sz_„a nr
also wish to receive the
following services (for an extra ~ ~I
fee): •~ ~
1. ^ Addressee's Address N
2. ^ Restricted Delivery °• ~
.m
Consult postmaster for fee ~
le Number CC
i 787 -553 ~~
ce Type m
ered ^ Insured ~ '~ u
ed ^ COD - c ;
s Mall . ^ Return Receipt for" ~
-Merchandise
If DDelilJvJery ~. ~ . w
C/ ~.f" Q
>seesAddress 10 ~ ~r
y if requeste ;~ ,
e Is paid) ~:~ . c
~'~~3 ~
"' t
bv~{~v
IAESTIC;RETURN RECEIPT
n~, r, _ ~ ~, ...,.r~ _ ~., . ^rl
...
... ,.
,.,
Z 155 787 555 ,....'
Receipt for
Certified Mail
~ No Insurance Coverage Provided
u~sr.~5 Do not use for International Mail
.os,~
(See Reverse)
c~
L
o:
0
0
OJ
ch
E
O.
Sen[ to
. & Mrs. Wau h
Street and No.
9410 N. 133rd E Av
P.O., State and ZIP Code
so OK 74055
Postage
.32
Certified Fee
1.10
Special Delivery Fee
i 'Re?;rrldted ~UelWery rFeB
?it+[urn iieceipt `Stfowfng
to Wham & Date Delivered
Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
Date, and Addressee's Address
TOTAL Postage
& Fees
~
2.52
Postmark or Date
1
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OWASSO
AND
MR. & MRS. DOUGLAS WAUGH
The undersigned, are in full understanding that the large dead tree primarily located
between Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 Windsor Lake Addition has been deemed a nuisance by the
City of Owasso and needs to be abated and removed.
We further understand that 80 % of said tree is located on Lot 1, Block 3 and 20 % is
located ~n Lot 2, Block 3 of ~x,hir>L 4Ve are n9;'nerS. I?~ addlti~n, ~`~v' ,~nrlers~n~) ~at the (`it~i
has incurred expense for the property survey and has requested bids for the removal of said
tree. The lowest total cost of the survey and the removal of the tree is $1600.00, of which
we will be responsible and agree to pay $320.00.
We understand that we are not required to pay any fees until an invoice is received
from the City of Owasso and that without this signed agreement, the City will be required to
abate the portion of the nuisance located on our property prior to the removal of the tree.
Subsequently, our property may be subject to a lien in the amount of $320.00.
Our signatures below confirm our understanding of this agreement.
~~
i ~ G~ ,---
r. Dough augh
_~ /
~-~,
Mrs. Laurie gh
Date
i~
ii
1 ~+
ii
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
DATE: October 13, 1995
MANAGERIAL:
PERSONNEL -The following personnel actions have occurred since the last report:
Police Department - Mr Jim Caputo has been hired as a police officer and will begin his
duties on October 23. Officer Caputo has been hired utilizing funds from the "COPS FAST"
grant. He is a CLEET certified police officer who will complete his Bachelor's Degree in
Criminal Justice from UCAT in May. He is an experienced law enforcement officer with
prior service in both county and municipal agencies.
CUSTOMER SURVEYS -Attached for your review are customer survey reports for September.
The surveys are providing a valuable tool for our benchmarking process. Hopefully, as our
work processes are improved, we will see customer surveys reflect that improvement.
FINANCE:
SALES TAX REPORTS -Sales tax reports for September are attached for your review.
September receipts exceeded projections and brought our year-to-date totals to a point slightly
ahead of projections. After one-third of the year, sales tax projections appear to be on target.
d
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
October 13, 1995
Page 2
^
COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT:
BUILDING PERMITS -Residential permits continue to show strength. Lot inventory remains
at a level that will continue to attract a variety of buyers. But the big news is in the outlook for
commercial construction. 1996 appears to have the potential to break all commercial
construction records for Owasso.
POLICE SERVICES:
POLICE RESERVE ACADEMY -The Owasso Police Department will begin the first Owasso ~
Police Reserve Academy on Tuesday, October 17th at the Community Center. The majority of
the training will be provided by members of the Owasso Police Department. The legal portion
has been arranged by Harold Charney, with coordination of the District Attorney's office.
Twenty-two students will begin the thirteen week academy, many from other cities. The reserve
force is used to supplement full time paid commissioned officers in their regular duties, and will '
become a significant part of our law enforcement strategy as their numbers increase. The use
of reserves "fits" very well in our overall goal of having our certified officers actively
preventing crime rather than performing routine chores that do not require a certified police
officer.
POLICE MOTORCYCLE -The latest addition to the Owasso Police Department vehicle fleet
is a new 1995 Kawasaki motorcycle. This purchase was approved through the FY95-96 police
budget and will be used for traffic enforcement, public relations programs, special events and
routine patrol.
FIRE SERVICES:
GAS LINE - I have asked Chief Allen to secure price quotes for bringing the gas service back
to an operational level. Currently the station has gas only to the water heaters. With the
expectation of cold weather, the station's heat system should be prepared to be placed in
operation. Once quotes are secured, a decision will be made regarding the next step. Please
note that the staff has reviewed the situation relating to the installation of the original gas line
and plans to request authority to proceed with legal action against the parties responsible for the
deviation from the specifications. ~
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
October 13, 1995
Page 3
RECREATION CENTER:
THEFT -Several items were recently stolen from the Recreation Center. Missing are hand tools
~ and a television set (with VCR). A police report has been filed. Value of items stolen is
approximately $600.00.
~,., ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
WHIRLPOOL -The Whirlpool start-up staff has departed their temporary offices located on
76th Street. Having them in Owasso was a plus for our community and hopefully will give us
ahead start in our relations with the company. Several key staff members for the company have
purchased homes in Owasso.
76TH STREET - 76th Street remains closed west of Sheridan. City officials had hoped that
promises to open the road from Lakeshore Drive east to Sheridan would be honored. However,
it appears that Whirlpool has requested work on the west section of the road be accomplished
first. Meetings with the county are set for next week to see if plans can be altered. As long
as the road is closed, people from the industrial park have a difficult time getting into Owasso.
That hurts our businesses and reduces sales opportunities.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Sales Tax Reports
2. Customer Contact Reports
3. Memorandum from Recreation Center Director dated October 4, 1995
4. Correspondence to Parks Department dated October 5, 1995
380, 000-
360, 000-
340,000-
320, 000-
300,000-
280,000-
260,000-
240, 000
Jul Aug Sep Oct
City of Owasso FY 1996
Monthly Sales Tax Comparisons
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
~- Actual ------~------ Budgeted ------f----- Last Year
:` 1 ~';
:` i ':
}
::
• l
~'.
,.
"x
'' ~•~••-
'
~ .i
, -
~ i
~.. ---~ ..................t% i
.,~
...t~ a.
~ ,{
.. :.
:.
;.
.; } .
-t ~
1•
Year-to-Date Sales Tax Totals
City of Owasso
Sales Tax Report
Budget to Actual Comparison
October 11, 1995
Month
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Total
Actual Collections
Amount Percent
$302,677.03 8.07%
318,501.67 8.49%
329,039.92 8.77%
324,380.83 8.65%
Needed to Meet Budget Over (Under) Projection
Amount Percent Amount Percent
($4,822.97) -1.57%
9,126.67 2.95%
(12,960.08) -3.79%
13,130.83 4.22%
$307,500.00 8.20%
309,375.00 8.25%
342,000.00 9.12%
311,250.00 8.30%
~1,~/4,5yy.45 33.99% $1,270,125.00 33.87% $4,474.45 0.35%
Note: 1995-96 Sales tax budget is $3,750,000
City of Owasso
Sales Tax Report
Two Year Comparison
October 11, 1995
FY 1995-96 FY 1994-95
Percent
Month Amount of Budget
' Jul $302,677.03 8.07%
Aug 318,501.67 8.49%
Sep 329,039.92 8.77%
Oct 324,380.83 8.65%
Nov
~. Dec
Jan
r Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
a Total $1,274,599.45 33.99%
Percent
Amount of Actual
$301,692.06 8.49%
292,779.43 8.24%
324,228.25 9.12%
295,730.32 8.32%
Increase or (Decrease
Amount Percent
984.97 0.33%
25,722.24 8.79%
4,811.67 1.48%
28,650.51 9.69%
$1,214,430.06 34.17% $60,169.39 4.95%
Note: 1995-96 Sales tax budget is $3,750,000
City of Owasso
Monthly Sales Tax Revenues
Last Four Fiscal Years
1995-96
1994-95
1993-94 1992-93
Jul $302,677.03 $301,692.06 $271,679.74 $256,380.27
Aug 318,501.67 292,779.43 278,089.83 275,012.32
Sep 329,039.92 324,228.25 32,455.67 259,741.34
Oct 324,380.83 295,730.32 294,492.60 261,162.85
Nov 267,872.41 266,960.75 251,827.27
Dec 304,226.02 272,932.89 259,629.25
Jan 300,361.72 287,405.63 256,300.45
Feb 345,341.44 330,279.54 311,015.32
Mar 257,422.54 241,723.44 241,764.75
Apr 265,865.61 253,895.72 225,578.49
May 293,128.36 281,932.49 259,194.14
Jun 305,553.54 277,848.81 254,285.28
TOTAL $1,274,599.45 $3,554,201.70 $3,359,697.11 $3,111,891.73
City of Owasso
Monthly Use Tax Revenues
Last Four Fiscal Years
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
TOTAL
1995-96
$4,593.11
8,036.95
3,178.59
3,650.24
$19,458.89
1994-95
$2,347.96
5,195.15
4,076.15
3, 958.33
2,548.55
2,368.14
3,208.97
5,094.64
2,432.01
2, 973.22
6, 397.24
5,905.32
$46,505.68
1993-94
$7,055.19
2,481.03
1,785.16
2,052.59
3,810.34
4, 678.28
2, 943.40
2,001.76
2, 409.54
3,566.91
2, 330.55
2,680.98
$37,795.73
1992-93
$2,355.12
2,066.42
2,463.21
7,465.74
15,618.27
6,201.50
8,182.30
3,987.31
2,229.25
2,104.18
2,390.28
2,566.50
$57,630.08
Note: 1995-96 Use tax budget is $45,000
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
6ctremely Dissatisfied
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Overall
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0.0 % 20.0 % 40.0% 60.0 % 80.0% 100.0%
10.0 % 30.0 % 50.0% 70.0 % 90.0%
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
6ctremely Dissatisfie
0%
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
0%
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Courtesy
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Period: 9/01/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 7 (100.0%)
Did the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
'~
direct y our inquiry?
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 7 (100.0%)
,~
Did the person to whom you were dire cted seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 7 (100.00)
,~
Was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action? it
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 7 (100.00)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 0 ( O.Oo) NO: 7 (100.00)
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6
----------------- - 9 W
--------
------------------------- ---
---
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
Scale 1-5 Count
---------- ------------ Count
------------ Count Count
------------ ---------- Count ~
TIMELINESS 0 ( O.Oo)
0 ( O.Oo) --
0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 14.3%) -----------
6 ( 85.7%)
4.86
QUALITY 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 2 ( 28.60)
4.71
5 ( 71.4%)
COURTESY 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 14.30)
4.86
OVERALL 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 14.30)
4.86
6 ( 85.7%)
6 ( 85.7%)
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
liepartment: PUBLIC WORKS Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
3SPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
---------------------------
---------------------------
-id you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
r concern?
YES: 3 ( 4.10) NO: 70 ( 95.90)
Lid the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 1 ( 1.4%) YES: 72 ( 98.60)
"id the person to whom you were directed seem to care abc,ut your concern,
zquiry, or problem?
NO: 1 ( 1.40) YES: 72 ( 98.6%)
..as that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 6 ( 8.2%) YES: 67 ( 91.80)
nid you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 10 ( 14.10) NO: 61 ( 85.90)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
---------------------------
---------------------------
Average
gale 1-5
TIMELINESS
4.51
"JALITY
4.43
3URTESY
4.74
Extremely
Dissatisfied
Count
2 ( 2.70)
1 ( 1.40)
1 ( 1.4%)
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
Count
4 ( 5 . 5%)
6 ( 8.30)
1 ( 1.40)
Neutral
Count
5 ( 6.8%)
Somewhat
Satisfied
Count
10 ( 13.70)
Extremely
Satisfied
Count
52 ( 71.20)
4 ( 5.60) 11 ( 15.30) 50 ( 69.40)
3 ( 4.10)
6 ( 8.20) 62 ( 84.9%)
JERALL 3 ( 4.10) 2 ( 2.70) 3 ( 4.10) 13 ( 17.80) 52 ( 71.20)
4.49
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0.
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0.
)% 20
% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.
Courtesy
% 20
% 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.
0%
0%
Extremely Satisifi~
Somewhat SatisfiF
Neuti
Somewhat Dissatisfit
Extremely Dissatisfie
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0.
10.0 % 30.0 % 50.0% 70.0 % 90.0
0%
10.0 % 30.0% 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.0 %
Overal I
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
I apartment: POLICE Period: 9/01/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
c ~ concern?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 7 (100.00)
I .d the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
c~~rect your inquiry?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 7 (100.00)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
'iquiry, or problem:'
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 7 (100.00)
~ is that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 7 (100.00)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 1 ( 14.3%) NO: 6 ( 85.7%)
1 •.
ES ESTIONS 6
O 9
I.~SPONS
----------
---------- T
QU
---------------
--------------- -
---
---
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
S~:ale 1-5 Count Count Count Count Count
`1 ~MELINESS 0( 0. 0 0) 0( 0. 0%) 0( 0. 0 0) 3( 42.9%) 4( 57.1 0)
4.57
QUALITY 0 ( 0 . 0%) 0 ( 0 . 0%) 1 ( 14.3 0 ) 2 ( 28.6 0 ) 4 ( 57.1%)
4.43
COURTESY 0 ( O.Oa) 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 14.3%) 6 ( 85.70)
4.86
t TERALL 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( 0.0%) 3 ( 42.90) 4 ( 57.1x)
4.57
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: POLICE Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS=1 - 5 ______________________________'
----------------------------
----------------------------
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 2 ( 4.30) NO: 44 ( 95.70)
Did the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 1 ( 2.0%) YES: 48 ( 98.Oo)
Did the person to whom y ou were directed seem to car e about your concern, "`'
inquiry, or problem? ,~
NO: 2 ( 4.30) YES: 45 ( 95.70)
Was that person responsi ve, and did he/she cause act ion?
NO: 5 ( 10.6%) YES: 42 ( 89.4%)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action? '~
YES: 5 ( 10.90) NO: 41 ( 89.10)
---------- --
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
Average
Scale 1-5
TIMELINESS
4.43
QUALITY
4.15
Extremely
Dissatisfied
Count
5 ( 10.40)
3 ( 6 . 5%)
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
Count
2 ( 4.20)
3 ( 6.5%)
Neutral
Count
2 ( 4.20)
5 ( 10.9%)
Somewhat
Satisfied
Count
6 ( 12.5%)
8 ( 17.40)
Extremely
Satisfied
Count
33 ( 68.80)
27 ( 58.70) '~
COURTESY 2 ( 4.3%) 2 ( 4.30) 0 ( 0.0%) 5 ( 10.9%) 37 ( 80.4%)
4.59
OVERALL 3 ( 6.4%) 3 ( 6.4%) 3 ( 6.4%) 8 ( 17.Oo) 30 ( 63.8%)
4.26
•
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
6ctremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
o.
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
6ctremely Dissatisfie
1 % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0% 90.0°
Courtesy
i
j
i
d
i
~ 1
i
d
).0 % 20.0 % 40.0 % 60.0 % 80.0 % 100.0
10.0 % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.0%
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied ! i
~ ~ i ~
I i I
€ -.
' ~[..~. i ~..
Neutral ~ i
[ i
~......._..i. _ - _ __
r .i..... ~__ .I
Somewhat Dissatisfed j I s
~ i
t i ~ i
I I
e ~ i e
___._..i.~~L..._.....i...........u._~_i.._.i.._ _. _ _
3! ...j.
i ~ ~
Extremely Dissatisfied ~ ! ~
i
3 ~ ~ ~
o.o% 20.0% 40.0% so.o% 60.0% 100.0%
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Overall
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfed
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
10.0 % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0% 90.0
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS "~
~f
Department: FIRE Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 2 ( 18.20) NO: 9 ( 81.80)
Did the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 1 ( 9.10) YES: 10 ( 90.9%)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
NO: 1 ( 9.1%) YES: 10 ( 90.9%)
Was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 1 ( 10.00) YES: 9 ( 90.Oo)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 3 ( 30.Oo) N0: 7 ( 70.Oo)
I ---------------
RESPONSES-TO-QUESTIONS-6-=-9
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied ~
Scale 1-5
---------- Count
------------ Count Count
- Count Count
TIMELINESS
2 ( 20.0%) ----------- ------------
0 ( 0 . 0%) 0 ( 0 . 0 0 ) ------------
2 ( 20.0 0 ) -----------
6 ( 60.0%)
4.00
QUALITY 2 ( 20.Oo) 0 ( O.Oa) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 10.00) 7 ( 70.Oo)
4.10
COURTESY 1 ( ll.lo) 0 ( O.Oa) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( ll.lo) 7 ( 77.80)
4.44
OVERALL 2 ( 20.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 10.00) 7 ( 70.0%)
4.10
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
j
j
d
100.0
.0 % 30.0% 50.0% 70.0 % 90.0°
Courtesy
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
o,
30.0 % 50.0% 70.0% 90.0°
Extremely Satisified
...........;..__..~_..t...........i........... t........._c...-...... c. ..
ii
~; :;
Somewhat Satisfied I
i ~ I -~!_._~.
j ~ i i...-- ~ --~
~ E
Neutral ! [ ' ` f
i i
$ ~ ~ ~ i i
i
~ -~._--f..-.._.:__..E-._..__.~~..._.
i ~
Somewhat Dissatisfied t
i 3
~ I i
~ ~
__ -_ ~....y~.
-..... i
i °
i i
Extremely Dissatisfied k ~ j
t
`s ~ i i i ~
i 3 i
0.0% 20.0 % 40.0 % 60.0 % 80.0 % 100.0
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Overall
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
f
f
J
i
i.o% zo.o% ao.o% so.o% so.o% too.o%
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: FINANCE/UB Period: 9/01/95 to 9/30/95
~I
----------------------------------------
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 4 (100.00)
Did the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 3 (100.00)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 3 (100.00)
Was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 4 (100.00)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 0 ( O.Oo) N0: 4 (100.0%)
----------------------------------
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely ,~
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
Scale 1-5
---------- Count
------------ Count
------------ Count
------------ Count
------------ Count
----
TIMELINESS
0 ( 0.0%)
0 ( O.Oo)
0 ( O.Oo)
0 ( O.Oo) -------
4 (100.00)
5.00
QUALITY 0( 0. 0 0) 0( 0. 0%) 1( 25.0 0) 0( 0. 0 0) 3( 75.0%)
4.50
COURTESY 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( O.Oo) 4 (100.0%)
5.00
OVERALL 0( 0. 0%) 0( 0. 0%) 0( 0. 0%) 0( O. O a) 4 (100 . 0 x)
5.00
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Lepartment: FINANCE/UB Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
F ;SPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
- ---------------------------
----------------------------
I''_d you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
c ~ concern?
YES: 0 ( O.Oo) NO: 20 (100.00)
Lid the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 1 ( 5.3 a) YES: 18 ( 94.70)
I';_d the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
iquiry, or problem?
NO: 1 ( 5.30) YES: 18 ( 94.7%)
t.as that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 20 (100.00)
T`id you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 2 ( 10.0x) NO: 18 ( 90.0%)
- --------- --------------- ---------------------------- ------------- --------------
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
- ---------
---------- ---------------
--------------- ---
---
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
;ale 1-5 Count Count Count Count Count
----------
TIMELINESS ------------
0 ( 0 . 0%) ------------ ------------
0 ( 0 . 0 0 ) 0 ( 0 . 0%) ------------
2 ( 10.0 0 ) -----------
18 ( 90.0 0 )
4.90
C"JALITY 0 ( 0 . 0%) 0 ( 0 . 0 0 ) 2 ( 10.0%) 2 ( 10.0 0 ) 16 ( 80.0%)
4.70
c )URTESY 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 5.0%) 2 ( 10.0%) 17 ( 85.Oo)
4.80
c 7ERALL 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 5.30) 0 ( O.Oo) 2 ( 10.5 a) 16 ( 84.2%)
4.74
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
6ctremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
Extremely Satlsified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0,
% 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.0°
Courtesy
' i
1-t'-'-~r-I
]% ?O.0% d0.(1% R0.(1°,4, R(1 (1 % 1f7(7 n L
1 % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.0`.
6ctremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
6ctremely Dissatisfied
0.
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
's j
Tyr- I T1
7 % 20.0% 40.0 % 60.0 % 80.0 % 100.0 %
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Overal I
i
i
i
3
i
i
J I
i
i
i
i
i i
).0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
10.0 % 30.0 % 50.0% 70.0 % 90.0
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
l apartment: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Period: 9/01/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
----------------------------
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
c ~ concern?
YES: 0 ( O.Oo) NO: 11 (100.00)
] _d the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
~..~rect your inquiry?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 11 (100.0%)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
'-zquiry, or problem?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 11 (100.00)
I ~s that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 1 ( 9.10) YES: 10 ( 90.90)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 3 ( 30.Oo) NO: 7 ( 70.0%)
:~SPONSES TO UESTIONS 6 9
------------ Q
------------- -
---
------------ -------------
Extremely ---
Somewhat
Somewhat
Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
Seale 1-5 Count Count Count Count Count
'TIMELINESS 2 ( 16.70) 0 ( 0.00) 0 ( 0.00) 2 ( 16.7%) 8 ( 66.7%)
4.17
QUALITY 2 ( 16.7 0 )
4.17
COURTESY 0 ( O.Oo)
4.92
0 ( 0.0%)
0 ( 0.0%)
0 ( 0.0%)
0 ( 0.0%)
2 ( 16.70) 8 ( 66.70)
1 ( 8.30) 11 ( 91.70)
~ TERALL 2 ( 16.7%) 0 ( 0 . 0%) 0 ( 0 . 0%) 2 ( 16.7 0 ) 8 ( 66.7 0 )
4.17
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
________________________________________________________________________________
RESPONSES-TO-QUESTIONS-1-=-5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry ~"
or concern?
YES : 1 ( 2 . 4 0 ) NO : 41 ( 97.6%)
Did the first erson ou talked with understand
P y your problem or know where to
direct your inquiry?
NO: 2 ( 4.80) YES: 40 ( 95.20)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 42 (100.00)
Was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 3 ( 7.1a) YES: 39 ( 92.90)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action? ~
YES: 5 ( 12.20) N0: 36 ( 87.80)
____________ ____________ _______________ ____________ _______________ _____________ _'rr
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
Scale 1-5 Count Count Count Count Count
TIMELINESS 3 ( 7.00) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.00) 5 ( 11.60) 35 ( 81.40)
4.71
QUALITY 3 ( 7.10) 0 ( O.Oo) 2 ( 4.80) 4 ( 9.50) 33 ( 78.60)
4.52
COURTESY 1 ( 2.4%) 0 ( O.Oa) 0 ( O.Oa) 2 ( 4.80) 39 ( 92.9%)
4.86
OVERALL 3 ( 7.10) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 2.40) 3 ( 7.10) 35 ( 83.30)
4.60
COMMUNITY CENTER
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
JANUARY -SEPTEMBER 1995
Timeliness Quality
i
tl ~
I
i
~~
t
I
d
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
).0% 20.0 % 40.0 % 60.0 % 60.0 % 100.0
10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0%
Courtesy
i
i
J
..~
i
j
's
t
j
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
.0 % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90
0%
Extremely Satisified
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
0.
I % 30.0 % 50.0 % 70.0 % 90.0°
Overall
Extremely Satisifie
Somewhat Satisfie
Neutr
Somewhat Dissatisfie
Extremely Dissatisfie
J
~ ,
-"I
100.0
.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0% 90.0°
i
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: COMMUNITY CENTER Period: 9/01/95 to 9/30/95
RESPONSES-TO -QUESTIONS-1-=-5
Did you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 4 (100.00)
Did the firs t person you talked with understand o
Y ur roblem or know where to
p
direct your inquiry?
I NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 4 (100.0%)
Did the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
i NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 4 (100.0%)
was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 4 (100.00)
Did you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 4 (100.00)
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
Average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
Scale 1-5
---------- Count
------------ Count Count Count Count
TIMELINESS
0( 0. 0%) ------------
0( 0. 0 0) ------------ ------------
0( 0. 0%) 1( 25.0 0) -----------
3 ( 75.0 0)
4.75
QUALITY 0( 0. 0 0) 0( 0. 0%) 0( 0. 0 0) 2( 50.0 0) 2( 50.0%) ~
4.50
COURTESY
4.50
0 ( O.Oo)
0 ( O.Oo)
OVERALL 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( O.Oo)
4.67
1 ( 25.0%)
0 ( O.Oo)
0 ( O.Oo)
1 ( 33.3%)
3 ( 75.0%)
2 ( 66.70)
CITY OF OWASSO
CUSTOMER CONTACT SURVEYS
Department: COMMUNITY CENTER Period: 1/26/95 to 9/30/95
] ~SPONSES TO QUESTIONS 1 - 5
----------------------------
----------------------------
~d you have trouble finding someone at City Hall to talk to about your inquiry
or concern?
YES: 0 ( 0.0%) NO: 21 (100.0x)
Did the first person you talked with understand your problem or know where to
erect your inquiry?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 21 (100.0%)
id the person to whom you were directed seem to care about your concern,
inquiry, or problem?
NO: 0 ( 0.0%) YES: 21 (100.00)
Was that person responsive, and did he/she cause action?
NO: 0 ( O.Oo) YES: 21 (100.0%)
id you have to talk to another person later to get action?
YES: 1 ( 4.80) NO: 20 ( 95.2%)
w.~
~'ESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 6 - 9
---------------------------
---------------------------
Extremely Somewhat Somewhat Extremely
average Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Satisfied
.gale 1-5 Count Count Count Count Count
----------
IMELINESS ------------
0 ( 0.00) ------------
0 ( 0.00) ------------
0 ( 0.0%) ------------
2 ( 9.50) -----------
19 ( 90.50)
4.90
7ALITY 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( O.Oo) 3 ( 14.30) 18 ( 85.70)
4.86
_JURTESY 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( O.Oo) 1 ( 4.80) 1 ( 4.80) 19 ( 90.50)
4.86
OVERALL 0 ( O.Oo) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( O.Oo) 3 ( 15.Oo) 17 ( 85.Oo)
4.85
MEMORANDUM
TO. CITY MANAGER
MR. RAY
FROIVI: RECREATION CENTER
JANIS WORLEY
SUBJECT: STOLEN ITEMS
DATE: October 4, 1995
BACKGROUN
Over the past 8 years we have had very little disappear from the Recreation Center, and nothing of any
great value, basketballs, volleyballs, etc..
Last week I discovered that our tool box was missing from the office. ~ This tool box contained all the
tools the staff uses at the center. Also there was a cordless drill that was missing.
A police report was filed on these missing items.
Yesterday I went to our cabinet where we keep the TV/ VCR and discovered it was also missing. I feel
that these things were probably taken at the same time. I have also done a police report on this item.
I have looked and do not think there is anything else missing but these were the only items that were of
any value.
I have made police reports and have contacted Regina Rogers on this matter.
Ms. Rogers has stated that she would contact you but I thought you might need sometl~{~g in writing from
me.
I changed the lock on the office door yesterday but I have not changed the other door loc~k~. Do you
want me to do that also?
Please give me some dirrection on this problem.
\~
(~et~bea 5, 1995
(13ud & Debbie ~~~le
934 ~fdl:.~srer~.:it ice
dlirliirgt~si, rJe~ 7"6017'
/817/ 472-8902
n`if~t~ a-~ Ouur~.a~-
~a~ ~DelUZet~reat
~. d. B~~ 180
'~ (7u~as~, ~7klalra`rta 7'4055
~: ~aee%a.~e a ~Ree c`c :zceara~~ a~ aur- ~a~c
' (7aR ax~aLd Like tom- a f~vee to Fe t/ce oae flrat cad.
~arard.:~ 1UiReluzde trlaee
~,, ~~ r.~-a-~ed ~ Lu~lr#xruz~ ui (~ii~ieE7d.~Lu~ ~aek. ~lea~e aece~ aue
elceek made aat to 'Tflade~ ~l_aFae~ to tu~ceelcase tluc teee. dae mac,
~acacsi 7fla-~P.aEd, 17', u~ leiLled u2 a ea.F a~~,dei~ /l~lc 3, 1995 aec
~Gcgluf~a~ 11 beta~eerz ~~ as2d ~lei~ele. ~e ~aed flee a~ctd.~ee~
~ aad use eaa triisik a~ s~aflus2~ Gef~fee tlraa f~- ~.er.E a tFee ui luc
`ne~iv~. ~ tFee lca~e~ ~.Beeae~ a~ uRilL laic `rnesn~H~. ~ at all ~ddi/Le
' aye u~cdd like ~ flute tFee ~ be tUlas~ted be~.aFe Oe}~Ger- 23, a~ flues
:~a.~ !u~ ~. 'TOe lruzeux flcia ca slr~ susfiee bat aa~rl~lzuu~ yaa
~ eaa do- fa e~edlte flii~ a~ald be g~eafl~ ~Ge alaa LBaed
Ciia,~ ~~ ayrd ct ~ aaR aadeRdtasulc'sut tluzt tlci.~ aeea c~
a~ ~e~eafed caiflc G.ylit~ at Clu~iat`naa. ~Jlcasil~ des aek~ s:uceli ~
a~'La~aRisu~ a~ to lresiae aae s.~r2 Grzfl-cu~ tzaFk.
~ J
^ ~~i~u~eRel,~,
~13ad, Debbie, & ~asnsrcie ~~, , ~e~.at
' P~-a'.:J,la ZUod dr ~~n-dle~ ~~a-y~da, ~li.:z~taa, ~e~
rl3ill~ & //laiv~ ~Paas~oa, Oa~a.~
~aaL Bea.~flet~ ~ ~~ ~fu7, (7u~aa~-
' ~'liaeas2.//l_ac~ & ~ul~, ~leiat~le
~~'aee,`i ~I3eadle~ & ~til~, C~rc/ua, /jZ~~oas~
Bill & ~iaerd~ 'Tf1a~e & ~ult~, Cvedae ~~ataid.~, ~a:r~a
~ ozcan:~ frcere (~aerrilie~
C~
PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular
DATE: October 17, 1995
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers, Owasso Community Center
Notice and Agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin
board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, October 13, 1995.
Marci Boutwell, City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Flag Salute
4. Roll Call
5. Request Approval of the Minutes of October 3, 1995 Regular Meeting.
Attachment #5
6. Request Approval of Claims
Attachment #6
Owasso Public Works Authority
October 17, 1995
Page 2 ~
7. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request from a citizen to address the ,~
Trustees.
Ms Shannon
Attachment #6
Ms Ann Shannon has requested an opportunity to address the Trustees concerning her
water bill.
8. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for Authorization to
Purchase Materials and Supplies for the Installation of a 4" Water Meter at the National
Steak and Poultry Location. '
Mr Carr
Attachment #8
The staff will recommend Trustee action to approve the expenditure of $2878.48 to
Water Products, Owasso, Oklahoma, for the purchase of materials and supplies necessary
to install a 4" water meter at the NSP site. ~
9. Consideration and Appropriate Action Relating to a Request for Amendments to the FY
1995-96 OPWA Fund. "~
Ms Bishop
Attachment #9
The staff will recommend Trustee approval of a "carry over" budget in the form of a
supplemental appropriation to the Wastewater Department of the OPWA fund.
Owasso Public Works Authority
October 17, 1995
Page 3
10. Report from OPWA Manager
11. Report from OPWA Attorney
c
'~ 12. Unfinished Business
r
~
~
13. New Business
4~
14. Adjournment
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, October 3, 1995
The Owasso Public Works Authority met in regular session on Tuesday, October 3, 1995 in the
Council Chambers at the Owasso Community Center per the Notice of Public Meeting and
Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, September 29, 1995.
ITEM l: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Burris called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
ITEM 2: INVOCATION
The invocation was given Pastor Linzy Slayden of the Friendship Baptist Church.
ITEM 3: FLAG SALUTE
The flag salute was led by Councilor Barnhouse.
ITEM 4: ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Charles Burris, Chairperson
Danny Ewing, Vice Chairperson
Mary Lou Barnhouse, Trustee
Joe Ramey, Trustee
Michael Helm, Trustee
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
Ronald D Cates, Authority Attorney
Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
A quorum was declared present.
ITEM 5: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19. 1995
REGULAR MEETING.
Ms Barnhouse moved to approve the minutes as written, by reference hereto; seconded by
Mr Helm.
AYE: Barnhouse, Helm, Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
Owasso Public Works Authority
ITEM 6: REQUEST APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Mr Helm moved, seconded by Ms Barnhouse, to approve the following claims as submitted:
(1) OPWA Fund $73,904.17; (2) OPWA Capital Improvement Fund $45,458.25; (3) Interfund
Transfers $34,233.17; (4) Payroll $26,038.61.
AYE: Helm, Barnhouse, Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0.
ITEM 7: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE TRUSTEES REGARDING DRAINAGE
SOUTH OF 76TH STREET.
Jim Downey addressed the Trustees, and thanked them and the Public Works Department crews
for some work done on the Downey property. Mr & Mrs Downey do not live in the city limits,
but had a problem with stormwater drainage on their property resulting from city developments
The Public Works Department cleared brush & trees and did some work to straighten the
drainage channel on the eastern edge of the Downy property after promised assistance from the
county was not forthcoming.
ITEM 8: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR TRUSTEE ACTION FOR A REVIEW OF THE STAFF
INTERPRETATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF OPWA RESOLUTION
#93-05.
Mr Mike Turnbaugh, a resident of Pleasant View subdivision, requested a review of OPWA
Resolution #93-05, which provided rate protection to city water customers who were previously
served by Rogers County Rural Water District #3. That protection allows those customers to
be charged the "in-city" rates. Staff interpretation of the language contained in the resolution
is that the rate protection is afforded to the customer, while Mr Turnbaugh believes that the rate
protection is applied to the property. The City Attorney has opinioned in Opinion #93-OS that
the rate protection is afforded the owner and not the property. Mr Turnbaugh was not present
to speak to the issue. No action was taken on the item.
ITEM 9: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO OPWA
RESOLUTION #95-07, A RESOLUTION AMENDING OPWA RESOLUTION
#93-05.
Mr Bill Witt, a resident of the Pleasant View subdivision, requested at the September 19th
meeting that all customers in the Pleasant View subdivision be charged the "in-city" rate, even
though some of those customers are not among the original customers acquired from Rogers
County Rural Water District #3. City Attorney Opinion #95-04 states that Mr Witt's request
would lack compliance with constitutional requirements for equal protection. All rates must be
October 3, 1995
2
Owasso Public Works Authority
October 3, 1995
equalized, not just one specific area. Several options were discussed. Staff suggested that the
city look at the possibility of annexing the Pleasant View subdivision as an option, and that a
plan be developed to equalize the rates. Mr Ramey moved to retain the existing rate structure
and instruct the staff to formulate a phased in plan that would equalize rates in a five-year time
frame. Motion seconded by Mr Ewing.
AYE: Ramey, Ewing, Burris
NAY: Helm, Barnhouse
Motion carried 3-2.
ITEM 10: REPORT FROM OPWA MANAGER
No report.
ITEM 11: REPORT FROM OPWA ATTORNEY
No report.
ITEM 12: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 13: NEW BUSINESS
None.
ITEM 14: ADJOURNMENT
Mr Ewing moved, seconded by Mr Helm, to adjourn.
AYE: Ewing, Helm, Barnhouse, Ramey, Burris
NAY: None
Motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m.
Charles L Burris, Chairperson
Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
3
~jtdgfi~-?~', p[•pT_.?(~ lfC.iRY= P,t?T~irlkTT~'
j. (l ." ~ ~,,'qr 9 . ;;z `.l4 S: P t-:i.: ~~ TF~t:=: FFPf?PT aP4.Ptlk P4{';F
P?l # YL'1~I;~rlk riF:~L:t+TPTT!~lTl ~r*[`i[T?='!'
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
?r,t]Q14 DEPT OF E~TVIR[11~TMEHTkI. CJ[TA SCI_:ID bdASTr t~tAt~AGE fi1=E 54c,??
riEPARTMENT TCTA,I.~ ____,. ~$~,~~
f?PWk Ai?~`TPTTSTRATICttd
------------------------------
S`6~?104 ROTdALD D PATES RETAIA[Fk %ft~.ti!t
'3t1?.?9 CEL,I,[IL.AR CUTE-TITI.SA PHSNF.. iT~,F-[:AkT* ? : _ 9? .
9t~"tc.1.4 CSC CREDIT SER~dTCES_ TIdC 9!9~ c'~i.I:E~TT{tII'=; ?5.Q(t
4~Q.~,9S ~TATkW.A..'r,' SIIFTW.A,RE TN+~ St)PTW.P,RE r`,4,='S
gr(t?~79 DO~::IER PRTHTTNt; PRTNTTP~G ?35.4?
~~~?%~ Ah1ERTC.AN '.=nCTF.T't' DP CIVTI, '*tE?4F;F.k:=HIP r)[FF^ 'at1.~~('i
4D31,~ SAht`^ CI:IIF ,T ANTTt?RIAI_ S[1FPI..TE'S [ 1?.,ti9
U~,ti~s?ft TFEAtii[k.F,,k PETTY ('ANN REThtEt APWp, (-:~:t?dFERETT~:~E [R1't,?~;
-~.4~t~:~tt) TRF,A~=~[?RFR PETTtt CAfi~H RETMfi p,PWA C~?PdFFREPI~:F ~i~_7;
DEPARTI~?FNT T~?TAL, ____> ' ;5?5.5°
J'd~ TFk
------------------------------
~',40?Et3 WATER PTt'Lfilii{'TS It~t _ MrTL'R h(ATrkT AI:S 1 qL . ~_'
9I,t153~ GdATFR PRt1D[T~_;T~ T?~C F.~~: Tkt.[~E: ~;T[PFT..,IF^ d'?,~,i'{1
q,~()Cot P?~A.D SPp.RkMAN HFTFk RFArrTp[C `~'.?~!
9,5~`^,7 ('.TTY (7F T[1I~FA kIi:TFR P[TTr[:NA~F $ias ?`.r~.$,93
?nCf~~4 I~jThiFAI,I, ACE HARDkIAkF (~1FF~.?,~TTI~dt '~'TFFL,7E' ~~''-a-:'~
~'fnS~E pTt,[.`fi CDt~miJNIr.ATTn?~~;. Ira kArtTn REPAIR ~1 3
9hQr`.58 C[idTAfi Cf_lRp. [TPtTFC1RP1 CL.EAI`I!REtdT 7_?4.rifi
96t1?7.5 C[TY GARAGE PARTc 9;'9~ ?4.??
9r,Q?t.h t;Q fiYSTEMfi FtjEC,.'DTESfiI, Q,:'95 ?4,?r',
4'~(t?''' ,ICiH?iAIY R(1t,F.kS 1~1r=TF.k fiE.Ai?FR 1~^_Rti
9f,???:3^~ 0:it'.AR tQ[;1.Aiik?~[ MfiTFk REr~r~prr _; j ~~, ft(1
GnTat, RRAD SPARxMa,?~ r~r.TF,R RFA??FR ? ~r. ~~
^c[1~:11 TYRO?dE PT4dKTA[S h?ETER REAr?EF ',~ _.~t
r m T T ---- ~^ n~~ ~,~
t~IASTE41ATEk
------------------------------
,, 9,-f1.`,44 TPIFTI.CCf GE.t;R 9r1PI [^. '?L'A [.T ~*sTp.T ~ yt.~r ,~.~ ~.r
~ ... T P t ~ .t. ~, ,.. _ i
a,4ft~~4 uTJ~iTAI.I. Ai~F. H~Rri[:1~4'F. t_;FFk~ ; T?dt; '_:[[~"t'~..T~~~ 4:%_`?f?
i~
(l~.d~~."ir7 P?1Li.Tf' L'-!CiT?'u!=; AT~TNr'F.'TTf
j'~'9?'9` ~:..j?•?4 e!P t-r,~ ~~,a,=; PFfi~'iFT ~F'GP?,~4 F~.r.
F'{t # tF+$i'~(}i? i";F=r'i*'TF'TT[t'd ~?-t?-'TTx'T
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
9,~t1r:5;-~ (:TjrT~P (;~'1RP. [i?<ITF[lF7Fi r'[.E.A?'d~`RF.,T4T f_-,=:_:~rl
~'~rl"15 ('~'~'~% GARA~~E r r. tnc
PART._, T - ~.. r.i ."k
9,~n?? 5 ~(1 $Y~TFT~t~ FiiF.[.,/?]IE~,F.,L, 9r'95 1~,?. ~~r.
'~,5n??6 wATF.R ENVTRCIHF~1Et~T FFi)ERAT t4Rh[PFRF[iTP l1TTr~ ~f~.rn
9,5Q~1.L SAM'S f'T_:UB .7A?yTTiIkTA[. fitiPPi..TE~ [?r.SR
Qrn~.~n TRF~Si1PFR FF.TT~ SASH RFTt'iS pfiTTY rp,FT~ ~~,~~
I`.FF.~,RT~iF?dT TlITA[_. ____ : 1 ; 4n-~.1
RFF[JSE C[?[,[:E!'TI~?NS
------------------------------
9.~.t)`94 ['IMRAL.L r_{_;~ [iAR.17~fARF nT1Pc'T., i F~ d _'~~
~b~bSR CT?dTAS t'[7RP. IIpdTF~~r,+i~f C:F,FAtd/REt.T 1~_ ~?ft
9f,r~f,~4~ 4dT[,[,?A~TS PFFtT^F 1'tJt1TPNFNT PARTF.~P[!T.y~°PT REPAIRS ?'~_ a:f
4.5(1?15 rITY C?ARpGF Pk,RT!=; 9.~+~5 ~J :';gin ~1:~
'~,~~?1 ~ t-:ITY GARAGE PAF'TF ~i?` «_ i.~s
4'r.ft?'; F. ~-;(7 ~Y-TENS F?TFT %[`~IF°=F.- 4'/q~ ;~, -0 .,,~
9~5fiR;(t TREArFiREk PF;TT4' ~:A~H ~.'F?TAE; PFTTV i:ArH ~. tli;
Gh(i;??i~ TF>=~.~?rRi=~' i}F,.TT'~ f:A~;N ~'1-TTiA ~F'i,7A !'~!?JFFPF.FT!':F ~;`1_ r:()
?7F.peRTMFPJT TITAL. ____? ~.~?^.17
RFCvr'LF CF,NTFR
------------------------------
Qh;~li~;-~ f.,it•~iTA.r-; ~.1~F'P. TTid?F;lRAq ('T ~e~~~l~~~p~T .-~- ;fir{
4'.x.(1?1 ~~ t~:ri ~V~TFTd^-, Flit=.T.!T'iTFF;i?i, q:'q~ ~t c~S
?'iFF4RTT4F1dT TC?T~.T. ====1 jj;~_7c,
F?iT?Tl TfiTAT, ____~~ ? t1~.4t?r; -
q
t,TT`~ nr n~~ta,=:~F
~`FWA ±'4TJTTAT,. Tr4p~~'l~r??r?FrT FTTr;r,
P(] *~ >7F23rif?T? TiT;^±:RTFTTr~'? ~.hf(?TTTIT
---------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------
13E?T ~F~?V T f'F
------------------------------
95~IQQ~ T,TP,F..RTY RA.r~K ~• '!'RITST (]WA.B T,t:fAl~' 4 s R1 _ _ (tTl
96f~(1fr'? T.TRFA.TS' Rar~x TFTTtiT f7T!:R~ T.~ lArd ?4. `1 ~ _,i7
P.EP~RTT*TF.r?T T('iTRT. ____~. '~?.o?~_,=+?
WA ~T~WRTFR
------------------------------
~6n) 5? T,G. F`~CAV~TTNt;
9ni7?~1 l:T~t;-MART
'~~PAFdTIdFrdT TC1T.A?. ____)
FcTr~n T; ETaT. _ _ _ _
^~GIFfi T.TrdF .FT?Ti4R PHA~'= ?j
4~_?f,
~0~.?`1.5f,
~1 2 . tl^1 _'~?
~ r~
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 09/30/95
OVERTIME TOTAL
DEPARTMENT EXPENSES EXPENSES
Water 398.97 4,625.93
.~~~1~~?~L~r . ><<:'><
»:.;::>::>::>::>::>:.>
,. ~,
Refuse 0.00 ~~,~t)2.~1
...~.~.~.~~r>:`><>>
'~ , "`
~::~
<><<<>>> ~ ~
...................:.........
OPWA Capital Improvement 0.00 1,415.08
..........::, ,,
APPROVE 10/17/95
Chairman
Trustee
Trustee
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
BACKGROUND:
HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
RODNEY J RAY
CITY MANAGER
UTILITY CUSTOMER REQUEST
REGARDING CHARGES
TO ADDRESS TRUSTEES
October 13, 1995
A utility customer, Ms Ann Shannon of 105 W Tenth St, has requested an opportunity to address
~ the Trustees in reference to her utility charges (water). Ms Shannon has met with various members
of the staff, including a Utility Billing Clerk, Utility Billing Supervisor, the Finance Director, and
the City Manager. Ms Shannon's request is not one that can be resolved by the city staff, and she
has, therefore, requested to address the Trustees.
~ The issue Ms Shannon raises relates to charges assessed against her for late payment penalties.
During the past twenty-four months, Ms Shannon has paid her utility bill late on ten occasions. On
each occasion, a late penalty was assessed against her account in accordance with city ordinance
(Ordinance #29) establishing such a penalty. However, Ms Shannon has never paid any of the late
charges. She simply pays the "current charges" and has ignored the required late payments. Over
' the last two years the late charges have accrued a past due balance in an amount sufficient to require
cut-off action as per city policy.
Ms Shannon refuses to pay the penalty charges and insists that she will not pay them. She has
requested that the charges be removed from her utility bill. The city staff has no authority to
remove charges required by ordinance. Therefore, Ms Shannon's request cannot be granted by the
staff. Further, based on the fact that the charges are set by ordinance, it is the staff's position that
Council/Trustee action to remove the charges is limited to repealing the ordinance (and resolution)
under which the charges are established. Even then, there would be a question as to whether the
outstanding balance of her bill would be affected. Simply put, the charges Ms Shannon protests are
assessed by law; there is no method for the staff or Trustees to remove or waive those charges
absent a repeal of the ordinance.
The staff has offered to allow Ms Shannon to pay the charges in an installment plan through a
payment agreement. The staff has also made known to Ms Shannon an agency that assists families
with utility payments. To this point, she is apparently unwilling to work with the city to resolve
the problem in any way other than a removal of the charges.
If you have questions, please call Ms Bishop or Ms Melchior.
ATTACHMENT:
Correspondence from Ann Shannon
~i,
--"~
'~ ~,,yy
ke
_._._ - •I
r0 ~ ~~ 9s
7` ur r" ~ ~
~,
~~ ~ --
----
--~~
~^ ~`,~ _ ~
.. ~, .
--- ~,
,•
,~~ ~`
,.. ~ OC ~ ------ ----
~:
r _,.
ti.
~~
-- --
----- - -
~M'
~ox~rrDUM
TO:
RODNEY J. RAY
CITY MANAGER
FROM: F. ROBERT CARR, JR., P.E. ~ `~'
PUBLIC WORKS DIItECTOR ~. ~~~~
SUBJECT: WATER METER MATERIALS
NATIONAL STEAK AND POULTRY FACILITY
DATE: October 12, 1995
BACKGROUND:
National Steak and Poultry is constructing a facility on 5th Avenue at South Cedar. Water to
the site is being provided by the City of Owasso from a 6-inch water line on South Cedar.
The City of Owasso has been paid fees by NSP for the installation of the domestic water supply
meter. Public Works Department Water Division personnel will install the service and water
meter.
r
PRICE UOTES:
~ Materials for the water meter installation were listed and provided to three vendors for price
quotes. The following quotes were received:
Water Products, Owasso $2,878.48
Utility Supply Co., Tulsa $2,997.50
Oklahoma Meter & Supply, Tulsa $3,049.64
Water Products provided the lowest quote on the required materials in the amount of $2,878.48.
FUNDING SOURCE:
_ Funds for this purchase are available in the FY95-96 Water Division Budget.
Page 2
NSP Facility Water Meter Materials
REC011~IlVIENDATION•
Staff recommends the Trustees authorize the purchase of water meter materials for the National
Steak and Poultry facility from Water Products, Owasso, Oklahoma in the amount of $2, 878.48.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Price quotes and memorandum from Water Distribution Foreman dated October 11, 1995.
~~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
F. Robert Carr
Cris King
Terry O'Donnell
SUBJECT: Quotes for Materials for Meter Set at National
Steak and Poultry Update
DATE: October 11, 1995
We still need the materials for the meter set at National Steak and
Poultry.
Please find three quotes fior materials attached to this memorandum.
Water Products, Utility Supply and Oklahoma Meter and Supply all
bid on these materials. I called all three vendors and all three
assured me that the quotes will still be honored.
Water Products was the cheapest vendor, with a quote of X2,878.48.
I recommend that we use Water Products to order these materials.
Please notify me when this material may be purchased, so that I can
schedule the work that needs to be done.
UIt1 i tK I"RUUVI. I J
lU~yltsJf14yf25 JUN U1 y~ 151( Itii0.016 P.02
Dater Products
PROJECT City of Owasso
{National. Steak & Poultry)
Attent~.on: Terry ODOnnell
BID DaTE FAx 272-4999
f'.O. Box 349
Owasso, Oklahoma 74055-0349
1-a00-Z26-2968
FAX: 918-377.4978
P.O. Box 100
Tontitown, A~kaneas 72770-0100
1-800-436-9059
FAX: 501-361-9068
QUOTATION
NUMBER
DATE May 31, 1995
Quantity Size Description Unit Wgt. Unit Price Extension
1 4" Neptune (Owasso Spec) Compound Met r 1950.00 1950.00
1 Brooks Jumbo Box W/Lid 71.80 71.80
1 6"X4" FAST 730X4A Ta in S1Eeve 188.96 188.96
(stainless Steel)
1 4" Flanged Gate Va1vL W/Hand Wheel ].4b.00 146.00
1 4" MJ X FLG Gate Valve 149.00 149.00
1 4" MJ X FLG 45° ELL W/Ace 72.00 72.00
1 4"X13" Swivel X Solid Ada ter 74.00 74.00
1 4"X4' FLG X F yQo 95.00 95.00
1 4" Custom Tap on 6" Line 99.95 99.95
1 4" MJ 45° ELL W/Ace 31.77 31.77
TOTAL 2878.48
Terms: Net 30
Thank ou for t o ortunit of s m' in -his
Allmon Anderson, Vice President
~ MAY .31 '95 13:13 FROM UTILITY SUPPLY CO-
DUOTATlON
w
PA6E.002
~ MATER MORICS SO~LIES
~ 5929 ~. 15th Street Tulsa, Okla. 74112
~jQxy ~aCO~. A LG! Date: -"~ ~ " ~1.~`
): ~i i ~~! d ~ Ow i9~~ O _ Name Of Job:
Location:
~!.!! Aso j ~//'.
ds Opcned: Engineer:
Description Unit Price TOE
i/ ~.
3~ x ~. ~~, ~ ~ ~ G.,~,.,~,~~..._ ~ ys~
!~ " FLT X/~i'' ~- /¢,~.2 3~,`• 2 0
~ c~~ p~~y~ ~:
e~
t. rHr-.31-177J 14 ~ 4b UK. Plt i tK 24 5UF'PLY
' S1 bL ,_ L4[fl vr, f+vrt iue
Tulsa. Okiahoma i 4107
{800) 880-0763
(918) 446-0044 QUOTATION
Fax {918) 446-1101
T ~,
918 446 1101 P.02
~ _ .:~
oaTE , / -~-----------------
r~lEOF,~ :rte
cual~rrt~r aESCa~PTtoN ul~aT PRU~ dcr>:rl~ pR~
.. ~} ,, _ tt
~ ~''°" ~ ~`^"^ ~ m ~-~ =-.~- SAY x.3.50 3.~~
,.
Y
~~3 a- ~~-~tz y~ ~` ~ F~:` ~v' t~:- / f. ~ ? /log. 77
~ ~~' ATU~~~~~ 5~,~.r~,~~ Co~a~z ~ 7(~.aa 7G.~a
.,
~.
,.
..
`t, m~ l ~, `Jp-l , ~~i ~ ~ O~ 7
ToT~~ 3o%~•%y
'I~Sanfsi,you, forgivcng us tkt vPYortunity to quatc.
ORDER MUST BE PLACED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF BIO DATE
~~5
TOTAL P.02
MEMORANllUM
TO: CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
' FROM: SHERRY BISHOP
FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CARRY-OVER BUDGET AMENDMENT
DATE: October 13, 1995
BACKGROUND:
At the close of the fiscal year, June 30, 1995, the OPWA had one contract outstanding that was
not included in the 1995-96 fiscal year budget. That contract was with Clifford Power Systems
for lift station generators for $28,880. The contract has been fulfilled and the vendor has been
paid from FY 1996 funds. Staff is requesting acarry-over budget supplement for the amount
of this contract.
RECOMIVMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a budget increase in the OPWA Wastewater Department of
$28, 880.
ATTACHMENT•
Memo dated July 20, 1995 from Robert Carr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sherry Bishop
Finance Director
FROM: F. Robert Carr, Jr., P.E.
Public Works Director ~_
SUBJECT: FY95-96 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION
DATE: July 20, 1995
Public Works has closed the following purchase orders for FY94-95 and has requested they be
reopened for FY95-96 since they were not completed. A supplemental appropriation in the
FY95-96 budget will be needed.
V n r
Beeline Traffic Control
Clifford Power Systems
FHC, Inc.
Hammond Engineering, Inc.
Memory systems
Sack & Associates, Inc.
Purpose
Signalization - 96th/Garnett
Ator/Service Road lift station generators
Wastewater Treatment Plant engineering
design services
Survey Hale Acres drainage
CARD plotter cover
Water, sewer and roadway engineering design
for NSP
Amount
$12,784.00
$28,880.00
$140,360.00
- $4,155.00
$40.00
$15,441.00
If you need additional documentation or details, please advise.