HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.09.09_City Council Agenda_SpecialPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TYPE OF MEETING: Special
DATE: September 9, 2008
TIME: 6:00 p.m.
PLACE: Old Central
109 N. Birch
Owasso, Oklahoma
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall b letin board
at 5:00 PM on Friday, September 5, 2008. -
J lianas M. Stevens, Deputy City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
Mayor Stephen Cataudella
2. Presentation provided by the Assistant City Manager for Administrative Services for the
purpose of reviewing various City policies, procedures, and funds.
Ms. Bishop
3. Discussion relating to Community Development Department Items
Mr. Rooney
Attachment # 3
A. Requests for Final Plat (2)
B. Request for Easement Closure (1)
C. Review transportation survey results and proposed contract with the Tulsa Transit
Authority
4. Discussion relating to Fire Department Items
Mr. Rooney
Attachment # 4
A. Proposed renewal of the Air National Guard Mutual Aid Agreement
B. Department of Homeland Security Assistance to Fire Fighting Grant
Owasso City Council
September 9, 2008
Page 2
5. Discussion relating to Public Works Department Items
Mr. Rooney
Attachment # 5
A. Review of bids received for a Mini Hydraulic Excavator
B. Proposed FY 2008-2009 Street Rehabilitation Priorities
6. Discussion relating to HR Department Items
Mr. Rooney
A. Employee request for disability retirement
7. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for an executive session for the
purpose of discussing matters where disclosure of the information would violate
confidentiality requirements of state or federal law, such executive session provided for in
O.S. 25, Section 307(B)(7).
Mayor Cataudella
8. Discussion relating to City Manager Items
Mr. Ray
Attachment # 8
A. Bailey Ranch Golf Course upcoming events
B. Proposed Carryover funds from FY 2007-2008
C. Review of water/sewer rates for rural customers
D. Stone Canyon annexation
E. City Manager's Report
9. Legislative Report
Ms. Lombardi
10. Report from City Councilors
Owasso City Council
September 9, 2008
Page 3
11. Adjournment
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: LARISSA DARNABY
CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT- EL RIO VISTA AMENDED
DATE: September 3, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso has received a request to review and approve an amendment to a portion of
the El Rio Vista Final Plat, located at the northwest corner of East 96`h Street North and North
Garnett Road (including the "PoMac's" service station facility).
ANAi,Y~iS_
Staff has received a request from the owners of a portion of land located within the El Rio Vista
subdivision. The owners request to have a final plat amendment to create new lot boundaries in
anticipation of future redevelopment as well as new development. The amendment is to divide
the existing Lot 1, Block 5 into two lots. Thus, the new plat would read Lots 1 and 2, Block 5.
The total area being amended is comprised of 3.75 acres of land. Lot 1 would be approximately
1.66 acres in size, and lot 2 would be approximately 2.1 acres in size. The tract is zoned CS
(Commercial Shopping), and again this amendment is in anticipation of future redevelopment
and new development. The application, as proposed, does meet all bulk and area requirements.
Staff finds that the request is consistent with stated intent of the zoning code and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
A site plan was concurrently submitted, with the final plat, to the Technical Advisory Committee
for their review. The site plan is for a proposed Quik Trip service station facility to be located on
Lot 2, Block 5, of the El Rio Vista Amended Final Plat. The site plan was proposed at the
Technical Advisory Committee's regularly scheduled meeting on August 27, 2008 and accepted
contingently upon the Final Plats approval. The proposed Quik Trip location is directly north of
the existing Bank of Oklahoma and the Caudle Commercial Development.
Any development that occurs on the subject property must adhere to all subdivision, zoning and
engineering requirements including, but not limited to, paved streets and sidewalks. The
proposed development will require no significant expansion of utilities or infrastructure. Sewer
and water service will be provided by the City of Owasso.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING:
The Owasso Planning Commission will consider the request at a public hearing on September 8,
2008.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff intends to recommend approval of the El Rio Vista Amended final plat.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. General Area Map
2. El Rio Vista Amended Final Plat
a
0
U
u
q
0
~~
-- Z
_,__. _ -
I
\1
Z _----~
E97STN
96PLN
W
Q
0
z
W
Q
W
'd'
O
E97S7N
W
~~
a
~~
~Z
E96PLN
VISTA
--
1
~' ~~
~~~ ~ __
'~ ----
~~U a
Z ~ - F as ~~.'._n __...!---J
/ ~ ~
~,_ I
El Rio Vista Amended CITY OF OWASSO
8/ I /08
I,0ge11C~ 111 N. Main Street
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
North
"1 FFFS MAP TS Ff)I2 T7~T-OR:MA"T"I~YNV YLRP«4}i <7t~I,Y AN:T~ 14 N4~'T~ !lv F E~!V:t>} ;~ i ~{?
KEPRi~~B}YNT AN ACLU RAPE AND "T'RUH BCAF~}:_ USh OF T"tLCS R2 AY IS W1TFft ,i ~~€ 918.376.1500
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATIE7N }3Y ~T`Z'Y OF OW ASSE7 01= 2TS ACC:TJI2AL;. Y.
E98STN
ToD N
8^ j~ o
i ~ a k~ tl~ U ~i ~
OZ ~E~C~c ~ »~~'~ ~ H y
~ €~~~ed~ ~ k24s 5~ oln
a ~~~~~~ a 3~s s ~~~ ~ o
days 3 a~~~~ „~°
~~'~: ~ o
~~ ~ 5~~ ~ 5averoR a~g ~ ~,
4~ ~ ~~~gF~ ~ a ~~s~€ `ih ~ ~eY&~ o
fJ ~ F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s$a ~~ a cG ~
`~ f, s a~~ga~ k~4'~ e~°3
~v 5S ~ ~ ~gg 4 € Y ds ~J'~ Y H
~~~8~b ~b °~`~E~ ~k~g ~ °~ p
Y'N"1 si 91 ~ SST' AL Y'N"1 ,SO'IR
_ _ -FYI INILL]E 3NIl 15V3 _ _ _ _ ~-
~~--~t F g I~a ~ oroN113NNN~wNON ~ ~ y~~
~ ~~ ~I~ q,
- ~ r
_ ` ~ _ WYI9L - ~ W
1
( ~-- .y
-tMS3.St - I ~ 1.
h ~ d;x a d • .m io.o s $gt~r
Q yin C ~ - I =I
VS .OS ~ ~'. B ~.
8 $ e~ e~ ~~r ~ ~~.
~^ f ~~ ~ ~ bl it
em I y
x$ e ~ ~ s
~ i ~ ~ ~~
.., o~~; i ~ ~ ~ N I .~ ; yN.os I
/~ ~ ~~FBt ~ 3. V O ° _U ~ hl S 1 z
4. ~ ~°€a:n ~ ~ z~u/lru ma ~ ~ Wa ~ ?11 r~
5- 917 1gI1S3.S1 m m r W.~
~(i~sn
zruY ira Nb 2
C ~ ~~fr$a~~ ~y-I' 1NrmYla ~
_, ~ a
ya` a~
W ~~~~ ~ xi uxo _ g~
_~ e
a ~~ 6 I ~'~~ _ '"'.~ 1163 r'ul3dna-.ol - 5 ~ A.
$'~3! f ~ ~ R'.~ R~',k' a ~ W
o/ - ~ ~.
1
~ 5 ' ~
f - - AL',9f NtION 311 I ~ IN'if6q fi
r ~,'Y4„'~~ p -H~vTSV3,st-- titkY35ti3.i% p 1HPC~'v3,s~ ~
~ y i
~ ~ ~~ ~ O JO ~~ JO ~ M ~ O JO i~ ~ ~
J 3 333 0 ~ b
W Q1 ^ W m ~_a -
// ~~ I ~\ ~ /~ ~\
O®
R
G
~~ °~ ~~~~~.sak ~~e 2 ~ ~ ' a a u w ~
o~ Fm~ aa=^~ S ~ a ~ a g a ~~ Y
z ~ is ~ ~ £ ~ b 9 s ~ ~ c ~ ~ y ~ o
a a ~ °~ec.' eqq anS m£ ~u~ 9-m6~~-~~ A ~ ~ Omu
G~ FwN' °~k 3M.° R ~ n _Z R W yg~ Oo.~ Ol
~~ b'-C~ b~~~w ~.~~ : ~Ya` p, gw:^ ~ ~g N ~~k"k' = ~j H ~LL4 ~
r~ ~ ~~ s~~~ ~oo kaec ~ ~~i~ O ~~ea mm ~1 ~_~ ~ ,,, oo, C
~ ~ ~-~ €=~s a~g~'~~~~~ ~ a~7~ ~ 3~z~ ~ ak ~ s~a ~ 1 ale` z O w~u
9&~ ~ I om U
~ U ~a~
~_
~ g ~~~~ ~as~y~~s~~ ~ nka~ ~ c~ ~ L
0
r~
o~
U nip
O w
N~
O vl
U d
L
~ o
~' l~
O
s
0
w
S a
~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~~ ~ ~m~ "~ _
c ~~ ~~ n a ~ ~~' a ~' z
;sWa a= ~~ s~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~W ~ ~~ y ~ ~~ ~~ ~ g~ ~
~~~~ s~ ~~ ~F s ~ s s ~ ~~ ~ ~S ~ a ~~ aa~ ~ ~~ ~
Y°~V ~o ~~ ~6~ ~ a ~ _~ ~ am ° $ ~€ ~ 3 is e~ s
~ ~~ ~a;a aa aa 9 ~ Cr
~~ a ~ S ~ ~
a a~ ~
i=os ~` a~ ss~~ ~ ~ u ~ ~~ ~~ x~ ~~: ss
~:o.~ g~ .a~ naffs ~ a g ~ ~' r s< a ~Y a « ~aW ~ ~6~
g~aa q ~~ e a " ~ a `sm ~ ~ ~~~
s- am aW~ E o ~ ~ ~a ~ - ~ aW u~ffi ~ ag s
ap ~ ~ ~"s"
~~~` ~~ ~~ ~e~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~= ~ ~ ~ ~~ °~~ a ~~
g a
Q ~ Asa"~ e4 ~~ a~=~~x Y ~ ~ o ~ '~ ~ ~g 4 ~ ~~ d~~ ~ ~~ ~
W ~Fw' e~s~ g n? e s ~ ~x
spas =~ ~ ?~a~~g ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~W ~ ~~ a~° ~ ~~ a
a~ ~~ ~e °sa zg s~ ~ ~ s ~ o ~< ~ ~~ ~€ ~ ~ re w.~ ~ oa
n a e'
~i ~ €s'YE4d a~ '~ 4 ~i E Yid SE Y d €a ~~€ ~ S
~a~ ~ ~ ~g~ ~ g ~ ~ oe ~ s~ ~
=~~sa~~ _~ W~gyGW~a" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~a <i 3W v g ~~ ~_~ ~ ~~
'... W a-~x€°~ ~~ .s~-c~~~g ~~ § ~ a ~~a ~ W~ a~ a ~ a ~~'a 4 ~~ a
y ~e~~~sg =S a~aa„tto~w v~ a ~ ~W~ ~ ak °g~' a~; ~ ~~
r a~~~ae~ ~~ aa~o~'~a~ ~a ~ e ~ ~ ~~$ a s ~ ~~ ~ `a ~s -° m a~ n
Ii I"' <.~a3o~' isn~_ s~za ~ o ~ ~ < sb a ~~ m-€ E W~
~s~a~ ~a mga=a a~~~ ~ `ax ~ ~ 5c~ -
~~~'m~ ~k ~3a€~g~~m ~~a~ ~ _ ~ ~~s ffi ~~ °~ ~a~ sg ~`a y~ a ~~
W °~~~~oa '_ ~~~~~~~F~ a5o~ ~_~ ~ a~. 4 s~ aff say ~~ ~~~ ~ ~a a
€pa._~ e: Via?"rea ~W ear ~ e ~ ~ ~- ~~ c ~~'^ y 3 ~
a~o~`~= ~~Y~`~asa~~~ g~sgg~~k ~ g~~ m ~ ~ a~ ~~~ ~~ fox ~ :~ ~
~~-<~$~ ~=~~~°a`€ ~a, _ ~ffiai~~ ~ peg a o ~ ~zs ffi~ e~ ~ a a 3 ~ a
_ aagW„~q ~-~~s~~~ga° a~aa"F,~ s~- ~ u~ ~~ yo s ~ c~~ ~ ~~ ~
F ~.c~age ~~ ga'" asg W >po~gW g m~~ ~ s -e "a b~~ °~~ ~ ~.~ s~
° ix°==.aa= ~s=~o_k~~eF¢ s m~"m.:~~ s -_g s nF ~~ erg` a sa" _~ s
o " ea~s~~~aas ~" ~ ~e~~a3am s ~e~ ~ s ~~ z ~~~ tae ? ~e~ ~ ~~
~~~`gr= ~kkN~_ ~~ga"€ ~ ~~=a~~~g ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~s ~~€ ~g~ ~a~ ~ og~ a ~~ €
$~a°~a- w~.~°~t~~W~aa a y~e~~~` s ~~~ € 3~ 5'"~ ~~" ~"s~ ~ ~~ s a° s
~Qg~p~~ am~e~okz~~as € s~,aa"~~~s A~,a ~ s ~g ~~~ $~s ~$m €"g~ s. a""~ u
C '-S~iff'e° d~Y:>a,.,<~Y •~ .4s='~- C€i ~Y,n ~ i Y ~ 3LC ~ ~ yy ~ ~ `F'
'S 3 M:` E
~ ~Ga~~=gam ~ a~'s.W~=ffi~`r ~ a~~~~~~ag~~ ~?~ y ~ y~~ ~~~ Mgr 4 ~~W ~ fig= ~e ~~` ~.
o~4=z~ma ~ ~~~z~hN~ops ~ oFS~QO3s~s ~°a e e ~~@~ 3~~ ~8 $ ~~~ g ~~~ ~' ~~~ a~
ffi ~ ~ o "
~ ~ ~w'.w-~°~~ ~ ~~~'~:~''°ss°a a gW~e~e~E~s so~~ ~ a g~~~ s~~ ~~mg - gib ~ ~"a_~~ "~ rm" ~~'$
c '~eJ`° 'ae°s"~z~~p~~ ~ ~~~z~,ca~ag ~~,~~an~ a~~g s~. ~~g ~ m~ $~~~ °u7 ~<g~ :°n
s ~ ~o~g~g~e o~o~a~~~~m~& ~.9~~€~€~€ ~~€~~~~ aa~~ °~~ g~~~ ~ ~`~~ ~ 4"s ~ ~~~ ~e~~ ~~s
~ _.> ~~as m _ka.:ea.;a_a~~ " _"$.;e.a~c., °_°° .~n .,a_" ~~: "_~~ ~ ~a~W ~ <~~~4 m~~ ,: ~'=a °'__~
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: LARISSA DARNABY
CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT -LAKE VALLEY IV
DATE: September 3, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso has received a request from Lake Valley Investments Group, LLC., for
the review and acceptance of the Lake Valley IV Final Plat of one hundred and fourteen (114)
residential lots, in nine (9) blocks on approximately 23.1116 acres of land.
LOCATION:
The property is generally located about a quarter of a mile north of East 106th Street North and
about a quarter of a mile east of North 145th East Avenue, immediately east of Lake Valley II
and immediately north of Lake Valley III.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Undeveloped
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Large Estate Single-Family Residential (Chestnut Farms)
South Single-Family Residential (Lake Valley III)
East: Large Estate Single-Family Residential (Ranch Acres II)
West: Single-Family Residential (Lake Valley II)
ZONING HISTORY:
July, 2005: The Owasso Planning Commission approved a preliminary plat for Lake Valley IV
with the following conditions:
• Applicant must indicate a 17.5' utility easement along the frontage
of all lots.
• Applicant must indicate a 20' utility easement where the water main
is shown on the plat.
• Applicant must coordinate fire hydrants with the Fire Marshal.
• Applicant must indicate a 40' radius at the south entrance on North
149`h East Avenue.
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:
The first step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is annexation. Annexation
is the method whereby land located outside the city limits is made a part of the city. Property
owners and land developers sometimes choose to have their property annexed into Owasso in
order to receive Owasso municipal services, such as police protection, refuse collection, and
sanitary sewer.
The second step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is rezoning. When a
property is annexed into Owasso, by law it must come in classified for AG Agricultural use. In
order to develop the property, the land must be zoned for particular kinds of uses, such as
residential, office, commercial, or industrial. Rezoning decisions are made in accordance with
the growth policy displayed in the Owasso Master Plan.
One type of rezoning that a developer may choose to seek is a Planned Unit Development, or
PUD. When a development proposes to exhibit a mixture of uses with specific regulations and
standards unique to a particular tract of land, a PUD is often the preferred land use control
mechanism.
The third step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is platting. A preliminary
plat is required for any development that proposes to divide land into two or more lots.
Preliminary plats illustrate the development concept for the property, and are often modified
significantly after being reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and the
Owasso Planning Commission. Sometimes, difficult development issues such as existing
utility lines, wells, or easements are brought to light at the preliminary plat stage and must be
remedied prior to development.
After the preliminary plat has been reviewed by the City and various utility companies,
construction plans for the development's infrastructure are submitted. These plans include
specifications and drawings for stormwater drainage, streets and grading and erosion control,
waterlines, stormwater detention, and wastewater lines. Often, approval is required of other
agencies, such as the Department of Environmental Quality for wastewater collection and the
US Army Corps of Engineers for properties that may be development sensitive.
Once the property development proposal shows a division of lots that is acceptable to both the
developer and the City of Owasso, a final plat application is submitted. A final plat illustrates
the layout and dimension of lots included on the final plat, right-of--way widths, easements, and
other physical characteristics that must be provided for review by the City. After obtaining
approval from the TAC and Planning Commission, the final plat is considered by the City
Council. If approved, the final plat is filed with the office of the County Clerk and governs all
future development on that property.
Another form of property division that can be considered in some cases is a lot split. Lot splits
are minor subdivisions of property into three or fewer tracts, and do not provide for any new
public streets. Typically, this is an appropriate option for a land owner who wishes to take
large undeveloped parcels of land and divide it into two or three smaller tracts.
FINAL PLAT REVIEW PROCESS:
The Final Plat review process is initiated when a property owner submits an application to the
City of Owasso requesting the review and acceptance of a subdivision of land. The application
shall be accompanied by the correct fee and final plat drawings and covenants. If the final plat
is one lot on one block the applicant may forego the Preliminary plat review, in such case the
applicant will be responsible for submitting a certified abutting property owners report at the
final plat stage so that staff may notifying abutting property owners.
Upon. receipt of a complete application city staff will begin reviewing the proposal for
compliance with the Owasso Zoning Code, Subdivision Regulations and Engineering
specifications.
The proposed final plat will then be presented to the Owasso Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) for review and recommendation. At that meeting utility providers and city staff are
afforded the opportunity to comment on the technical aspects of the development proposal.
The TAC will forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission.
The Owasso Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to determine if the application is
compliant with the Owasso Zoning Code, Subdivision Regulations, and Engineering criteria.
The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to the City Council.
The Owasso City Council will then determine if the final plat meets city specifications and
approve, deny, or approve the final plat with conditions.
If the City Council approves the Final Plat the applicant will then produce copies of the
approved Final Plat for signatures from the appropriate officials and file it with the county
clerk's office. The applicant will provide the city with three signed and recorded plats along
with an 8 %2 X 11 copy and an electronic copy for records.
ANALYSIS:
The current owner/developer of the subject property plans to develop the area with one
hundred and fourteen (114) residential lots in nine (9) blocks, on 23.1116 acres of land. The
proposed development is allowed by right with the Planned Unit Development 01-03, which
was approved by the Planning Commission in September of 2001, and the underlying zoning
designation being RS-3 (Single-Family Residential).
Three reserve areas have been included in the platted area, Reserve Area "A" being located on
the northwest corner of the tract and serving as a utility easement. Reserve Areas "B" and "C"
being located on the eastern boundary of the subdivision and serving as both detention and
utility easements. The detention easements will be reviewed as to their adequacy at providing
detention for the property. Before any building permits may be issued, all details related to
water and wastewater improvements must be reviewed and approved by the Owasso Public
Works Department.
The proposal for single family homes on the Lake Valley IV final plat is consistent with the
Owasso Land Use Master Plan and is compatible with the most recent zoning decisions
rendered by the Owasso City Council and Planning Commission for the area.
The Lake Valley IV final plat is subject to all requirements set forth in the Owasso Zoning
Code and Subdivision Regulations, including livability space, which is the area of a given lot
less areas dedicated to easements and/or building setbacks, unless otherwise addressed within
the Planned Unit Development.
Any development that occurs on the subject property must adhere to all subdivision, zoning
and engineering requirements including, but not limited to, paved streets and sidewalks. The
proposed development will require no significant expansion of utilities or infrastructure.
Residential sewer service will be provided by the City of Owasso, while water service will be
provided by the Washington County Rural Water District #3.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING:
The Owasso Planning Commission will consider the request at a public hearing on September 8,
2008.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff intends to recommend approval of the Lake Valley IV final plat.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. General Area Map
2. Lake Valley IV Final Plat
~ _.. ~.
.,
\,
i ~`
~ I
-~ ' ~ /~ ~
~~,
--- - ~.__
Cj-
_ _
,-
_ ,
-- -
~~ ~~ ~~ ' F
~,, ~,
t ~
~ ~~ , ~ ,
:~
l <
_~ ~- ~,
:, ..
~ ~ ~ ~
_ .
~~
--
-,
~ ~- ~. ~ _~
t/ ;
r=~ ~ ~ _
x ,
,- _ ,
_: _-
~ --
.,
,Y ~, ~r
__ L~MCE ~A LEY IV - _- -
(~ _ -
/_
~~
v
i ~ ~ ~
=_ ;
,~ ~ ~ -;
~~ _-
- ]f^'~`'~~~r/]/~ ~ l~ v ~ ~ ~
' ~` ~
~ ~.
' ~ _ ---
1 \ J
~, ~,
~~ ~~ ~
\ \
~.
I
~ „~'~ `~ Y
/~~ ( \_ \
~._
E 106 SST 1~l _ _____-~~ _':
_~ _~. -_ i
.--
II,,I ~
I ~
~, I ~ I ~
Lake Valley IV CITY OF OWASSO
8/1/08
Legend 111 N. Main Street
P.o. soX i 80
Owasso, OK 74055
North
TEfiS 3\1AP IS FOE2 TIaTE OR;~~TA E EQN P1;RPC?SE eq~I_S 4'v~3 I~`a ;v <3T I7~TSN7~F.E} Tf7
ExNP~rS~.;.r ~:<_ ~cci;xa~~=. f~~.rg~ r€zt ~, sue,, f_,_ ~ ~ ~ <,~~ ?~~.:~ ~.~a~ €s wirr3c~~,T 918.376.] 500
WAE2RA:'ti TY' <}R R1~PF2 E';°s Eri"E~A.'T'IC7N E3Y C'3 F. fi- c .,::.<~^ c ~,:: 1'TS AC,C'L h:1C"~'.
DEVELOPER
~~~~
Lake Valley Investment Group, L.L.C.,
Kourtis Property Management, Inc.
Pets KOUrtls, Presitlenl
P.O. e0s 260
Owasso, Oaahoma ]4065
916 2R 3282
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
~~~-
Tulsa Engineering 8 Planning Associates, Inc.
6]3] South fi5fi Eaal Avenue
Tulsa, Oaeheme ]4193
0 ss xs wst9oB~s 2~NE ~^. zoos ~~
~,a,T~...m~
'
A.r.w ~mr. ~~. 6a ~ mm„a,a ~ ~ ~.~, ,.
Ewa. m,w^ W c e Ae ~w~.^ .... m n...n ~wa.e a a.
OPUD 01-03 •~R..N^ow.~..tlr~a~..~~~,.b~.e.~,,,....h...6..,,
Ratl a wa ~mamo zoo-
Lake
Val
ley
IV oa.6,N. r 2ooa.
~ w~
(Block 3; Block 4, Lots 18 thru 43; Block 6; Block 7; Block 8, Lots 2 thru 9;
and Block 9, Lots 1 thru 11), A subdivision in the City of Owasso,
being a part of the SW/4 of Section 10, Township 21 North,
Range 14 East, Rogers County, State of Oklahoma
Q
100 50 0 100 200 300 °"'A,^#'r"'pj0~~°~""
Grab b Feet: 1'. 100' z,x`
\1IyI~
jI71~
_ .. .~ I
_ -_ I
a ~~ \ s~
,j~µ~~,
,oskg;~.`.r~,,~ ;;
I/O/h %ace
""'/ //Olh 51 f NoNh A
I6 ~y
13 - ~~
h, 9 ~~
N d IB ~' '4~ .
~X tB~
A -,,. ~ F
m s e~zo ~I, a ~.~ ~:
/~' ~ ~t.,;~ is ~ \;y~V "y° -~ ~ Fa~~ sm ~~ ~ ~e cL;« '1J ~ ~
~z ~A ~/ `F 14` ~ , 16 12' ~ ~ I
~ h ~/ ,~ / ~ '4< L as 1] ~ISB 14813 0 s.
4 Y ~ 19 ~ 8 3 u~
~`~ ~~~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ w 164 ~ ~ n wv soma w.m ~ _ ~I
''X' , ~~ C g20 s~ 0 ~~
5 ~+ ~ `iE, ' Eg51 fO81h fH N nh A ~ ~ ~ 4
/ ~ y
,1 '~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ s d~10 ~. ~ a $ i3~ ala 2 5 m
Location Map
R-14E
urowe Es ul
g ~." .,
in
~.ii uRwe.e
toss S TnEET NOR1H
Segion 10
Rogers County
114 Lets - 23.1116 Aces
L`9K., r s t. ,.m A.m r -
Y fi L > 1~ Is~g z~ i U
'r~u ' , s ` '~o„ - I6 $ 1]g Ise ~
01'0~15~ 9 3 22 ! 6 9 0:
i 51 ,109th Sneel Abnh 3 8 p
~~i Ar3`2 , ., 23 En ss. wm 8 10 Ig
t ~ 24 ~~ w uc 2 9
8 8,
,
A ``~, rwe.e s~ S. 999999 - „ r ^ O _ s _J tl
.. Gi ,/9 2 ~p. WW6K
~, , t~ ~ r ~
I„
---JI--------------=~=~'--
;ti.s;~~ am„a ..Nx .. Polnr of COmmexemen~Y
Le end Backflow Preventer Valve Lot Addresses
ww^,nmaa ~nw ar m. oarwoe~
DrE DMeea Eernwn, upe~nram senid~cexe, nunMb,^pd Eronsn,w 6+r,em^xn ThaeYb®es ve ngenmtluNeW
Rrv~~^.wi.fi.~aim, a«.~,.~w. m.. mewu a^a e.,eiaa m«'~^Rammwaw N+Qi+s^^.
Wsry9wmem m9m nc^mpyxmmaicMwaiwnme,eesw,gsw~0-
Rx. ~muueeon deny reeuna Wcl^lvx O,erwne vare. ~
~ ~ R°""°"°° Line Table '~
Monument Notes ~^^^e nwwo aR~ ~'
AYe•.te'6aormetl aw.Nne Yalow Rees. mP NnpeE'R15,253'ro ~ a
erMU r Pw 6mMUy comare Phm wm~M1tlm unlw nomJ ~'~
_ 15x,3
t6 tler^,meE be, wNayelb. Rutlc~sw^wetl'Rt33x53'a N4x°34'_]'w _ se tst05 ~
mriww vMr ^Platlm dlmpme^v^a.,nrv mW ScT]6'u'W _ -~ ~ T,!' Ge ~ 19 5301 ~ 1 ,StPSt
oNerxaeJM m emx4'KW w3.]5' ,5305
AYC.ta'Mkm,M pv rMh eyNbxpWCOp.wngeC'R151a9'm ~ 6~35'aTN N9pro0'00'E 53.OG
ee«,m.e maa mows^. ~m.,..ruom,oam.mo.w, waam rs Nbx°zn>w ar3sN3'W a 5tw
w^Iwm. eeimem W„wme ww.,Ramamre.e mw.. miwra ~,o No °+e'arw room~E _____ a +szoo
wwe..m w.«w w.eaem.., ea, ~wac^^ a i^cAwm.,a. ~s~zoe
.aw.ma6m~wwa. CurveTable e i js „3„ .. ....^ 3^ ,r„e,
DetailedDetailed Vicini~Map
Note
me Ougwa r,cperty sm a mro'A~ o^
FlRa nup Nx. 4053~60t05G 99'x.llw
ben la av^,a nw •umn oae3ae ssW.TM
Fkoe L'mia anw.n M1wenn emero P,gwW E1leesre
T
21
N
lake Valley IV
s. zoos sn991 1 or 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: LARISSA DARNABY
CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A PARTIAL EASEMENT CLOSURE
DATE: September 3, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso has received a request from the Lake Valley Investment Group, LLC for the
partial closure of a utility easement located in the side yard on property recognized as Lot 18, Block
9, Lake Valley III. A site plan and a general area map are included with your packet.
PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS:
The legal description of the property is Lot 18, Block 9, Lake Valley III.
The tract is zoned for RS-3 Single-Family Residential use. The existing land use is residential for
the subject property, as is land to the north, south and west. An undeveloped tract occupies land to
the west.
The subject property is located within the Lake Valley addition and is served by Washington
County RWD#3, and municipal wastewater, police, fire, and EMS service.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant desires to close a portion of the existing 10' utility easement in order to construct a
single-family dwelling unit on the site. The easement is not in use, and all utility companies have
been notified, and have accepted the modification to the utility easement. The dwelling unit, as it
is currently planned, would encroach into the existing utility easement, thus the basis for the
easement closure request. If the easement closure request is approved, the existing 10' utility
easement would be modified to a 5' utility easement. Staff finds that this request will have no
detrimental impacts to the subject tract, or the surrounding areas.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
The request for the partial utility easement closure was reviewed by the Owasso Technical
Advisory Committee at their regular meeting on June 25, 2008. At that meeting, utility providers
and city staff are afforded the opportunity to comment on the application and request any
changes or modifications. There were no comments provided.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING:
The Owasso Planning Commission considered the request at a public hearing on July 7, 2008. At
that meeting the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council approve
the request. The applicants are ready to proceed with the building process and anticipate submitting
construction plans for the future single-family home within the next month.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff intends to recommend that the request for the partial utility easement be approved.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Easement Closure request letter
2. Site Plan
f
# ~ ~ ~~~
y ~~ trph:
yu Mfr ...,,,zd;,~y.
..
Land Planning Civil ~,ngineering Project Management Land Surveying
6737 South 85th East Avenue I Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133 t 918-252-9621 i Fax 918-250-4566
City of Owasso
111 North Main
Owasso, OK 74055
918.376.1545 Fax 918.376.1597
Eric Wiles, Community Development Director
Request to Partially Vacate Easement
Tulsa Engineering & Planning Associates, Inc. {TEP) represents Lake Valley Investment
Group, L.L.C., P.O. Box 240, Owasso, Oklahoma 74055, the owner of Lot 18, Block 9 in Lake
Valley III, as shown in the attached exhibits (EXHIBIT "A" and "B").
We hereby request that the portion of the easement shown and described in said exhibits be vacated
by the City of Owasso at the earliest possible convenience. The existing 10' easement reduces the
buildable width for this lot to 5' less than neazly all the other lots in this subdivision. The owner
would like to build a house on this lot with the same width as the other lots in the subdivision. TEP
has contacted all four of the franchise utility companies and they are satisfied that they would have
enough room for their infrastructure in the remainder of the easement. Further, this side yard
easement is not needed far any public utilities.
We look forward to hearing from you regarding this request.
Project Manager
7F.003 -Vacate Letler.wpd
O
z
Location Map
R-i 4-E
Lhutrh
STATE HIGHWAY 20
~
~ W
2
Q W
q
N ~
m
W
N
~ Q
EAST 166TH STREET NOflTH
urpuuoa
Section 10
Rogers County
36B S.F. or O.OOB9 Acres
Exhibit "A"
Lot 17, Block 9
~ Lake Valley III
_5' Utility Easement (Bk. 1945, Pg. 685) _
- - - -
_ _ _ J
_ _
rn
`C r
~-~
~
`
-
=
- ------
-
--- -
.~ E 10' Utility Easement (Bk 1945, Pg. 685}
E
~ i.n Portion of Proposed Utility W ~
~
~'~
Easement to be Closed ,
,
I~ ~~ ~~
'~ ~~ Lot 18
Block 9 ~a
~,° ,
Lake Valley III ~
~
~Y
~ p ,
~r
'D Q
'~ ~m D
QL
v
CV ~
r
Lot 19, Block 9
Lake Valley Ill
PROPOSED CLOSURE OF UTILITY EASEMENT
LAKE VALLEY III
Tulsa ~n~ineerin~ ~ P~annin~ Associates, Inc. Job No: 05-037F
6737 South e5tl, ~astAvenuc Tulsa, Qklahoma 74133 SCale: 1" = 20'
Phone: 9 i 9-z5z-96z i Pa` 918-250-4566 (\ (~ Date: 06/06/08
Qivil ]=,nginccrina~. Land SurvcJinp .~anc~ Planning l~ v
~ c~ai~~,1~..FA~nhad~,r~~N~~.iv fi~~nW~dpol~,Jon~~o,:aap
Lvmvlvry Che.lnut Fanns ll
Llrrpla>tvp Chvshut Famu Flarxh
Aaas
Ealalas
L~l:f
V ! /
"- Ranch
laM I ~/ aCBa
VaAry ! a,~ ,: Eslales II
Valby
I!I ' U~gshallod
T
2~
N
C
W ~
>, ~
~c
~~
u~ ~
o~
- .~
o
- 0
~~
V7
N~
u.
G_105.0371MfscDwgs105-037EX~ 9.dwg, 6/06!2008 - 3:20 PM
Exhibit "B"
Land Description for Proposed Closure
of Utility Easement in
Lot 18, Block 9, "Lake Valley III"
The south 5.00 feet of the 10-foot side yard easement adjacent to the north line of Lot 18, Block 9,
"Lake Valley III", a subdivision in the City of Owasso, Rogers County, State of Oklahoma, according to
the official recorded plat thereof, as filed in Book 1945, Page 685 in the records of the Rogers County
Clerk's office; the side lines of said south 5.00 feet to be shortened or lengthened to terminate on the
20-foot front yard building line and utility easement and the rear yard 17.5-foot building line and utility
easement in said Lot 18; said 5.00 feet being as measured perpendicularly from the north line of said
Lot 18.
Said tract contains 38$ square feet or 0.0089 acres.
CERTIFICATE
I, J. Patrick Murphy, of Tulsa Engineering & Planning Associates, Inc. and a Professional Land
Surveyor registered in the state of Oklahoma, hereby certify that the foregoing legal description closes
in accord with existing records and is a true representation of the real properly as described.
~? ~ (~(a .. ~~j .,~~C ~,.~ f G i o~~5S I O.ArAL
4.~.
Date .Patrick Murphy,
Oklahoma P.L.S. No. 1511 ~ ~ MURPHYK
~~ P. L- S. 1511
PROPOSED CLOSURE OF UTfLITY EASEMENT
-LAKE VALLEY III
pXLatia~
Tulsa ~n~ineerin~ ~ P~annmgAssociates, ~nc. Job No: 05-037F
6J37South85th~,astAvenuc Tufsa,Q~:lahoma7~133 Scale: N/A
Phonc: 9 i s-z52-96z i ~ax: 91 s-25o-~r566 ~ Date: 06/06!08
~ivi~ ~,nginccrin~e • L,anc~ SurvcJing .L,anc~ Punning
~ G~~tifmme of A~~~Fummc~o. N... f 1 i ~cncwo~ p,~~ J~~~~ )o, zoog
G:105-0371M1saDwgs105-037EX19.dwg, 6/06/2008 - 3:15 PM
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: COMMUTER BUS SERVICE
PROPOSED AGREEMENT
DATE: August 29, 2008
BACKGROUND:
In June, the staff presented to the City Council a proposal to study the feasibility of partnering with
Tulsa Transit Authority to provide commuter bus service to Owasso residents who work at the
Cherokee Industrial Park and downtown Tulsa. Such a park and ride program would operate
weekdays from the Owasso Community Center located at 301 South Cedar to locations throughout
Cherokee Industrial Park and then to various points in downtown Tulsa in the mornings; then a
return trip from downtown Tulsa to Cherokee Industrial Park to Owasso in the late afternoon. At
the June work session, Councilors expressed an interest in determining the interest of Owassans of
a transit service. Subsequently, the staff conducted a survey of Owasso customers to gauge local
interest in the program.
SURVEY RESULTS:
The survey prompted a significant amount of participation from Owasso residents. Out of
approximately 9,500 surveys distributed to citizens throughout the fenceline, 887 surveys were
returned, via mail and by the City's website. In total, 665 respondents indicated that they could use
and would be interested in using the transit service, a 74.9% rate of support. To arrive at this total,
the staff counted all of the survey responses that indicated a "yes" answer to questions 2 through 5.
Responses that were left blank were counted as "no" so that the results of the survey would not be
skewed. The five questions asked in the survey were the following:
1. How do you presently commute to your employment? (circle one)
Drive alone - 812 Carpool - 72 Bike - 1 Walk - 2
2. If you work in downtown Tulsa or at Cherokee Industrial Park, would you be interested in riding the bus?
Yes - 732 No - 155
3. If you work in downtown Tulsa or at Cherokee Industrial Park, would you be interested in riding the bus if
a one-way ticket cost $1.50 ($3.00 round-trip)?
Yes - 757 No - 130
4. If the bus picked up riders from the Owasso Community Center at 7:05 AM, delivered the riders to the
Cherokee Industrial Park by 7:20 AM, and delivered the riders to downtown Tulsa destinations before
8:00 AM (for example, the delivery at Cheyenne and Soh Street would be 7:49), would you be interested in
riding the bus?
Yes - 680 No - 207
5. If the bus picked up riders at downtown Tulsa destinations starting at 4:47 PM (for example, the pick up at
Cheyenne and 5`h Street would be at 5:05 PM), picked up riders at the Cherokee Industrial Park at 5:24
PM, and delivered the riders to the Owasso Community Center by 5:35 PM, would you be interested in
riding the bus?
Yes - 684 No - 203
COST OF SERVICE:
The service would cost the City of Owasso $45 per hour. It is projected that the service would total
667 hours annually, bringing the projected yearly cost to $30,015. The City of Owasso would
utilize CDBG funds to pay for the service, and has included the amount in the FY'09 budget.
DESIRABILITY OF SERVICE:
One of the stated action strategies of the Owasso Land Use Master Plan is to explore the feasibility
of transit between the Cherokee Industrial Park and Owasso. Transit service could be another key
step in moving Owasso towards becoming a contributing partner in the Tulsa regional economy.
As Owasso grows, it continues to attract a demographic group that works in Tulsa, likes the quality
of life that Owasso offers, and wishes to help the environment by cutting down personal commuting
when possible. Studies indicate that the Tulsa metropolitan area is currently on the verge of
reaching a "non-attainment" air quality status, and that such status could be avoided by small
increases of participation in transit services. As the public continues to become more informed
about issues such as this, the demand for services like commuter transit begins to grow. Offering
such service could make Owasso more competitive in our efforts to attract residents.
In 2005, a previous transit survey was conducted, which indicated 88 respondents could utilize and
were willing to utilize the express commuter transit. As previously mentioned, the transit survey
conducted this summer indicated 665 respondents who could utilize and were willing to utilize the
express commuter transit.
DETAILS OF POTENTIAL SERVICE:
If approved, commuter bus service to the industrial park and downtown Tulsa could start in
November, 2007. Bus fare would be $1.50 for aone-way trip. If the City opts to participate in the
project, the Community Center would serve as the park and ride location.
It is proposed that riders would be picked up from the Community Center at 7:05 AM, delivered to
the Cherokee Industrial Park by 7:20, and delivered to various downtown Tulsa locations before
8:00. In the afternoon, riders would be picked up from various downtown Tulsa locations starting
at 4:47 PM, picked up at the Cherokee Industrial Park at 5:24, and delivered to the Owasso
Community Center by 5:35.
The City of Collinsville has also been invited to participate in the commuter service. If Collinsville
participates, one proposed location to serve that community is a church at Highway 169 and East
136`" Street North. Riders would be picked up from that location at 6:50 AM, and delivered back to
that location at 5:50 PM. If Collinsville participates, Tulsa Transit's service hours would increase
to 917 hours annually, increasing the total cost of the service to $41,265. The City of Owasso
would pay $30,015 as previously mentioned, and the City of Collinsville would pay the remaining
$11,250.
Should Collinsville choose not to participate, Owasso would have the option of paring the
Collinsville share of the $41,265 and securing a second park and ride location in Owasso. A
possible second site that the staff is evaluating is the Reasor's parking lot at the southwest corner of
the interchange of Highway 169 and East 116t" Street North. By locating a second park and ride
site in the northeast corner of the community, Owasso could provide more extensive coverage to
citizens desiring the commuter service.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff intends to recommend City Council approval of the express commuter bus service with
Tulsa Transit. Should the Council approve the service, then the staff would present a contract
between the City of Owasso and Tulsa Transit for approval at a following meeting.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: BRADD K. CLARK
FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
OKLAHOMA AIR NATIONAL GUARD
DATE: September 3, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The Oklahoma Air National Guard Fire Department (OANGFD) has requested the City
of Owasso's consideration for entering into a mutual aid agreement for fire services. The
mutual aid agreement is designed to afford reliable back-up services for both parties in
the event of significant fire, medical, and hazardous materials incidents.
MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS:
Entering into mutual aid agreements is commonplace today, as the responders from
neighboring organizations are able to effectively contribute to the successful emergency
response to catastrophic incidents. OANGFD has initiated this request and supplied the
proposed agreement form.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The proposed mutual aid agreement allows both parties to request fire fighting equipment
or hazardous materials response and also establishes a chain of command during such an
event. The agreement does not obligate firefighting resources, however, if the agency is
already committed to emergency incidents.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff intends to recommend council approval of the mutual aid agreement with the State
of Oklahoma Air National Guard Fire Department and authorization of the Mayor to sign
the agreement at the Regular Council Meeting on September 16, 2008.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Copy of the proposed Mutual Aid agreement
AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL AID IN FIRE PROTECTION
AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT RESPONSE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2008,
pursuant to the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1856 (a) by and between the United States of
America through the office of the Secretary of the Air Force, represented by the United
States Property and Fiscal Officer, the State of Oklahoma Air National Guard, acting
through the Adjutant General of Oklahoma, and the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, a
municipal corporation.
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, it is feasible and desirable for the parties hereto to enter into a reciprocal
agreement for mutual aid in furnishing fire protection and hazardous materials incident
response for property and personnel for which each party hereto is normally responsible
for providing fire protection and hazardous materials incident response.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that:
Upon request by a representative of the City of Owasso (hereinafter City) to a
representative of the Oklahoma Air National Guard Fire Department
(hereinafter OANGFD), fire fighting equipment and personnel of OANGFD
will be dispatched to any point within the area for which the City normally
provides fire protection or hazardous materials incident response as
designated by the representatives of the City.
II. Upon request by a representative of the OANGFD to a representative of the
City of Owasso fire department, fire fighting equipment or hazardous
materials incident response and personnel of the City will be dispatched to any
point within the fire fighting or hazardous materials incident response
jurisdiction of the OANGFD as designated by the representative of the
OANGFD.
III. Any dispatch of equipment and personnel pursuant to this agreement is
subject to the following conditions:
(A.) Any request for aid hereunder shall include a statement of the amount
and type of equipment and personnel requested and shall specify the
location to which the equipment and personnel are to be dispatched, but
the amount and type of equipment and the number of personnel to be
furnished shall be determined by a representative of the responding
organization.
FOR THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY
OF THE AIR FORCE:
By:
The Adjutant General of Oklahoma
Date:
By:
United States Property and Fiscal Officer
For Oklahoma
Date:
By:
Base Commander, 138` Fighter Wing
Oklahoma Air National Guard
Date:
3
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: BRADD K. CLARK
FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTING GRANT
DATE: September 4, 2008
BACKGROUND:
In April of 2007, the Fire Department applied for the Assistance to Firefighting Grant
Program (AFG) through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The grant
application included a variety of firefighting, training, and personal protective equipment
items. The Fire Department application was for $117,030 in grant funds. The AFG
program includes 90% grant funding and 10% matching by the grant recipient.
A portion of the grant funding would provide for the purchase of a variety of equipment
used during emergency incidents. Included in the grant award is the purchase of ten
portable radios, rehabilitation equipment for firefighters operating at emergency
incidents, traffic cones and warning lights for the cones, and a firefighting accountability
system used to track teams of firefighters operating in structure fires.
An additional portion of the funds obtained through this grant would be utilized to
purchase wildland firefighting apparel for twenty personnel. The equipment includes
Nomex pants, jackets, and hoods and wildland helmets, goggles, and boots. This
purchase would provide a complete wildland firefighting package to department
personnel who have never been issued the apparel. Additionally, the grant award would
provide for the continued purchase of traffic safety vests, now required of all emergency
responders operating on roadways.
The remainder of the grant program would be utilized to fund in-house training as well as
travel to training classes. Included in the award is a Firefighting Strategies and Tactics
class, Firefighter I and II classes for those who lack the certification, and electronic and
audio/visual training equipment for in-house training.
FUNDING:
Funding from this request is derived from a grant in the amount of $105,327 from the
Department of Homeland Security. The Fire Department operating budget will provide
the City's matching requirement of the remaining $11,703 if the grant is accepted by the
City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff intends to recommend City Council acceptance of the Assistance to Firefighters
Grant Program in the amount of $117,030.00 and approval of a supplemental
appropriation for the Fire Services Budget, increasing revenues and expenditures in the
amount of $105,327 at the Regular Council Meeting on September 16, 2008.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
FROM: TRAVIS BLUNDELL
UTILITY SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR PURCHASE
WASTEWATER COLLECTION DIVISON
DATE: September 3, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The FY 08-09 Public Works Department Wastewater Collections Division budget includes funds
in the amount of $32,000 for the purchase of a new hydraulic excavator. Public Works currently
has aMini-Excavator that was purchased in 2006 and is being utilized among six separate
divisions. For the past two years, staff has evaluated the performance of the Mini-Excavator and
has been very pleased. In addition to the 2006 mini-excavator, the Public Works Department
operates a 1997 Ford Backhoe that has become increasingly unreliable. The purchase of the
new compact equipment will increase the Public Works Department flexibility to enter and
perform work in tight areas with reduced disturbance to public or private property.
SOLICITATION OF BIDS:
In August 2008, bids were advertised and proposal packets were mailed to three (3) prospective
vendors. Three (3) bids were received on September 3, 2008 (See attachment "A" for bid
summary). Evaluation of the bids indicates that White Star Machinery and Supply Co. (Tulsa,
OK) is the low bidder at $28,189.47. A few exceptions were noted with this bid but will not
affect equipment performance capabilities.
FUNDING SOURCE:
The FY 08-09 Wastewater Collection Division Budget includes $32,000 in Capital Outlay (61-
455-54400) for the purchase of a new Hydraulic Excavator.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff intends to recommend Trustee approval for the purchase of a current production model
425 Compact Excavator from White Star Machinery and Supply Company of Tulsa, OK for the
total amount of $28,189.47.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Bid summary
Attachment A
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR
Bid Opening: September 3, 2008
BID SUMMARY
Number of Bids: 3
Bids Opened By: Marcia Boutwell
Witness: Steven Eaton
Bidder Bid
White Star Machinery $28,189.47
Tulsa, OK
Ditch Witch of Oklahoma $28,310.14
Tulsa, OK
Warren Cat $39,015.00
Tulsa, OK
Certification:
I, Marcia Boutwell, Contract Administrator, do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
this Bid Documentation is true and correct.
Signature: /s/Marcia Boutwell
Date: September 3, 2008
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ROGER STEVENS
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: FY 2008-2009 STREET REHABILITATION AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PROPOSED PROJECT LISTING
DATE: September 4, 2008
BACKGROUND:
Included in the FY 2008-2009 Budget, the Capital Improvements Fund allows for the
expenditure of $1 million for the repair and/or resurfacing of residential and non-residential
roadways. Additionally, staff is proposing a traffic signal enhancement program to improve
traffic flow throughout the City.
Street Rehabilitation
Street rehabilitation sites have been evaluated and selected based on a comprehensive assessment
of roadway conditions. The selection process was aimed at maximizing a return on investment
by increasing roadway lifecycle and minimizing future maintenance costs while enhancing
overall roadway driving conditions and public safety.
Once more, the City of Owasso is wishing to maximize return on expenditures by partnering
with Tulsa County in the completion of the roadway project. It is anticipated that following the
acceptance of proposed sites by Council, a formal request for the use of County labor and
equipment will be submitted for approval via an Interlocal Agreement.
Signal Enhancement
Over the past five years, a population increase of 27% (9,900 citizens) has occurred within the
City fence line. As a result of such growth, the coordination and timing of the identified signal
intersections is no longer efficient due to the increase of traffic resulting in delays. Thus, the City
proposes a "Traffic Signal System Study" and implementation of recommendations resulting
from such study. It is expected that following the acceptance of the proposed program by
Council, a formal request for proposals from traffic engineer consultants will occur soon after.
PRIORITY STREET REPAIRS AND SIGNAL ENHANCEMENTS IDENTIFIED:
In July 2008, the street inventory data was updated and refined. The database for the model was
adjusted to reflect changes in segment conditions and a new high-priority listing was generated.
In addition, City staff identified several traffic signals in need of coordination improvements. A
map depicting the location of the priority sites has been included (see Attachment A). The new
priority listing includes data for fifty-one street segments and eighteen signalized intersections
containing reference locations (see Attachment B, C). The anticipated cost of the list of
FY 2008-2009 Street Repairs and Traffic Signal Program
Proposed Project Listing
Page 2 of 2
improvements for the Street Rehabilitation is approximately $750,000 while signalization
enhancements are estimated at approximately $250,000.
PROJECT FUNDING:
Funds for this project in the amount of $1,000,000 are included in the FY 08-09 Capital
Improvements Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Recommended FY 08-09 Street Repair and Signal Enhancement Sites Location Map
B. Priority Site List -Street Rehabilitation Program
C. Priority Site List -Traffic Signal Rehabilitation Program
Attachment "A"
.o
a
FY 2008-09 Street Rehabilitation Program Sites
Attachment B
Street ID: Street Name: From: To:
1 053AT01 E 116`" Street Garnett Road to N 117`" Pl E
2 063AT05 E 116`" Street N 109`" E Ave to Garnett Road
3 063AT06 Garnett Road E 116`" Street to E 118`" Street
4 073AT05 Garnett Road E 114`" Street to E 116`" Street
5 203AS06 N 1215` E Ave E 89th Place N to E 90`" Street N
6 203AS09 N 119`" E Ave E 89`" Place to E 89`" Street
7 203AS 10 N 119`" E Ave E 89`" Street to E 90`" Street
8 203AS 11 E 90`" Street Owasso Expressway to N 119`" E Avenue
9 203AS12 E 90`" Street N 119`" E Avenue to N 120`" E Avenue
10 203AS 13 E 90`" Street N 120`" E Avenue to N 1215` E Avenue
11 203AS 16 E 90`" Street N 1215` E Avenue to N 1215` Court E
12 203AS26 E 90`" Street N 1215` Court E to N 123rd E Avenue
13 203AS30 Owasso Expressway E 86`" Street to E 90`" Street N
14 291AS06 N 117`" E Ave E 83rd Street to E 84`" Place N
15 291AS08 N 117`" E Ave E 84"' Place N to E 86`" Street
16 291AS15 E 83rd Place N 117`" E Avenue to N 118`" E Avenue
17 291AS16 E 83rd Place N 118`" E Avenue to N 119`" E Avenue
18 291AS17 E 83rd Place N 119`" E Avenue to N 120`" E Avenue
19 291 AS 18 N 1215` E Ave N 120`" E Avenue to E 84`" Street
20 291AS19 N 1215Y E Ave E 84`" Street to E 84`" Place
21 291AS20 N 1215` E Ave E 84`" Place to E 85`" Street
22 291AS21 N 1215` E Ave E 85`" Street to E 85`" Place
23 291AS22 N 1215` E Ave E 85`" Place to E 86`" Street
24 291AS39 N 120`" E Ave E 83rd Street to N 1215` E Avenue
25 292AS09 N 124`" Place N 124`" E Ave to N 125`" E Ave
26 292AS 10 E 83rd Street N 124`" E Ave to N 125`" E Ave
27 292AS 11 N 125`" E Ave N 124`" Place to E 86`" Street
28 292AS 16 N 124`" E Ave N 123rd E Ave to E 83rd Street
29 292AS31 N 125`" E Ave E 82nd Street to E 82nd Place
30 292AS32 E 82"d Place N 125`" E Avenue to Cul-de-sac (end)
31 292AS33 N 125`" E Ave E 82"d Place to E 83rd Street
32 292AS35 E 83rd Street N 125`" E Ave to N 126`" E Ave
33 292AS36 N 126`" E Ave E 82"d Street to E 83rd Street
34 292AS37 N 126`" E Ave E 83rd Street to E 84`" Street
35 292AS38 E 84`" Street N 126`" E Avenue to Cul-de-sac (end)
36 292AS39 E 84`" Street N 126`" E Avenue to N 127`" E Avenue
37 292AS40 E 84`" Street N 127`" E Avenue to N 128`" E Avenue
38 292AS41 E 84`" Street N 128`" E Ave to N 129`" E Ave
39 292AS42 N 127`" E Ave E 82nd Street to E 84`" Street
40 292AS43 N 128`h E Ave E 82"d Street to E 84`" Street
41 292AS47 N 128`" E Ave E 84`" Street to E 84`" Street
42 301AS01 4`" Street Carlsbad Street to Beaumont Street
43 301AS02 4`" Street Beaumont Street to Atlanta
44 303AS03 3rd Street End to Carlsbad Street
45 303AS04 3rd Street Carlsbad Street to Beaumont Street
46 303AS06 Beaumont Street 3rd Street to 4`" Street
47 303AS 14 3rd Street Beaumont Street to Atlanta
48 304AS20 3rd Place Cedar Street to Dogwood Street
49 304AS22 3rd Court. Dogwood Street to Elm Street
Attachment B
50 304AS23 3rd Court Elm Street to Elm Place
51 304AS47 Dogwood Street 3'rd Place to 3rd Court
FY 2008-09 Traffic Signal Un~rade Intersections
Street Name and Street Name
1 E 96`" Street Garnett Road
2 N 129`" E Ave Mid-High School
3 E 86`" Street N 145`" E Ave
4 E 86`" Street 8TH Grade Center
5 E 86`" Street N 129`" E Ave
6 E 86`" Street N 123rd E Ave (east intersection)
7 E 86`" Street N 123rd E Ave (west intersection)
8 E 86`" Street N 117`" E Ave
9 E 86`" Street Owasso Expressway (east side)
10 E 86`" Street 169 Hwy South Bound Off Ramp
11 E 86`" Street Garnett Road
12 E 86`" Street Main Street
13 E 86`" Street Mingo Road
14 E 76`" Street N 129`" E Ave
15 E 76`" Street Owasso Expressway (east side)
16 E 76`" Street 169 Hwy Ramps (east side)
17 E 76`h Street 169 Hwy Ramps (west side)
18 E 76`" Street Owasso Expressway (west side)
19 E 76`" Street Main Street
Attachment C
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
OWASSO PUBLIC GOLF AUTHORITY
FROM: WARREN LEHR
RE: OPGA ANNOUNCEMENT
DATE: September 3, 2008
Mr. Burd will be making a presentation to the Golf Authority on Tuesday evening regarding an
upcoming announcement concerning Bailey Ranch Golf Club. A copy of the PowerPoint
presentation will be provided to the Authority at that time.
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF STONE CANYON
DATE: August 29, 2008
BACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso has received a request to annex the majority of the northern two square
miles (approximately 1,233 acres) of the Stone Canyon development. Stone Canyon is a large
multi-use development proposed for the area roughly between North 161St East Avenue and
North 193rd East Avenue on the south side of East 76th Street North, stretching south to State
Highway 266 (also known as East 46th Street North and Port Road). The entire development
area is 3,330.95 acres, and was placed within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved by
Rogers County on October 17, 2005.
PROPOSED LAND USES WITHIN STONE CANYON DEVELOPMENT:
A variety of land uses are approved for Stone Canyon, though the lion's share of the acreage is
reserved for single-family residential use. The specific breakdown of land uses is as follows:
1. Single-family residential: 2,655.87 acres
2. Multi-family residential: 60 acres
3. Commercial: 99.02 acres
4. Mining: 458.86 acres
5. Industrial: 36.01 acres
6. Open Space: 21.19 acres
Though the acreages are not yet determined, the developer proposes locations for an elementary
school and a fire station within Stone Canyon in addition to the above uses.
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
Land bordering Stone Canyon within the Owasso fenceline is predominantly used for single-
family purposes, with examples of subdivisions being Rockford, La Strange, Timbergate, and
Oakridge. Gundy's airport lies north of Stone Canyon, and the Anchor Stone rock quarry lies to
the west. Additionally, there are over 500 undeveloped acres bordering Stone Canyon within
Owasso's fenceline.
PRESENT ZONING:
Stone Canyon PUD -Rogers County
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:
The first step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is annexation. Annexation is
the method whereby land located outside the City limits is made a part of the City. Property
owners and land developers sometimes choose to have their property annexed into Owasso in
order to receive Owasso municipal services, such as police and fire protection, refuse collection,
and sanitary sewer.
The second step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is rezoning, and can
happen concurrently with annexation. In order to develop the property the land must be zoned
for particular kinds of uses, such as residential, office, commercial, or industrial. Rezoning
decisions are made in accordance with the growth policy displayed in the Owasso Master Plan.
The third step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is platting. A preliminary
plat is required for any development that proposes to divide land into two or more lots.
Preliminary plats illustrate the development concept for the property, and are often modified
significantly after being reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and the Owasso
Planning Commission. Sometimes, difficult development issues such as existing utility lines,
wells, or easements are brought to light at the preliminary plat stage and must be remedied prior
to development.
ANNEXATION REVIEW PROCESS:
The annexation process is initiated when a property owner submits a petition to the City of
Owasso requesting that the City bring the property into the City limits.
The applicant must submit as part of the request a signed petition requesting the annexation, an
accurate legal description and map of the property being requested for annexation, and a certified
300' radius report so that staff may send legal notices to surrounding property owners. Upon
receipt of all appropriate materials, the staff initiates the review process which begins with a
thorough analysis of the request.
The annexation request is then presented to the Owasso Annexation Committee for review and
recommendation. The Annexation Committee is made up of staff, elected officials, and citizens.
The Committee reviews the petition for compliance with the Annexation Policy and establishes a
recommendation to the Owasso Planning Commission.
The Owasso Planning Commission holds a public hearing to determine if the property is
compliant with the Owasso Annexation Policy and establishes a recommendation to the Owasso
City Council.
The Owasso City Council will make the final determination to annex the property or refuse
annexation. If the property is annexed into the City limits, an ordinance officially declaring the
2
annexation is written and adopted by the City Council. Once adopted, the ordinance is circulated
to the appropriate regional and national agencies for recording and altering maps.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF ANNEXATION:
According to Oklahoma statutes, the City of Owasso may annex this property with the consent of
the property owner as long as the territory is contiguous to the existing incorporated limits of the
City. While the property is not adjacent with the developed portion of the city's limits, the
property does lie contiguous to the city's fenceline, a 66' wide strip of incorporated area,
satisfying the statutory requirement. Owasso ordinance number 346 annexed this 66' wide
fenceline, and was passed on October 18, 1985.
According to municipal requirements for annexation, once the City of Owasso receives a request
from the property owner for the territory to be made a part of the incorporated area, the request is
reviewed by the Annexation Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The
Annexation Review Committee originally considered the annexation at their meeting on
November 28, 2007. At that meeting, the committee determined that the Stone Canyon territory
requested for annexation is serviceable by the City of Owasso and recommended approval of the
annexation.
However, the annexation process was paused after the November Annexation Review
Committee meeting so that the issue of fire service, an on-going concern for the development,
could be addressed. The staff brought the annexation request back to the committee on May 28,
2008, where the committee reaffirmed it's recommendation that the annexation be approved.
The staff is now ready to bring the request to the Planning Commission. On September 8, 2008
the Owasso Planning Commission will consider the annexation at a public hearing, and will then
make a recommendation to the City Council whether to annex the property. The City Council
will then consider the annexation request.
As per code requirements, the staff has mailed notices of the public hearing to the owners of
property within 300' of the subject territory, and has published the notice of the public hearing in
the Owasso Reporter.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting that the City of Owasso annex just less than two square miles (1,233
acres), located between North 161St East Avenue and North 193rd East Avenue on the south side
of East 76th Street North. It is the applicant's intention to develop the property for a variety of
uses, including residential subdivisions, an elementary school, and a fire station. The property
has already been placed within a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and parts of the property
have already been platted. The applicant has requested that the land be annexed into Owasso so
that the development will be able to receive municipal services. The portion of the PUD planned
for future rock quarry use is not included with the annexation request.
These two square miles form a part of a development known as Stone Canyon, a large multi-use
community planned to extend from East 76th Street to the north to Highway 266 to the south.
Over 3,000 acres in size, Stone Canyon proposes a variety of uses, including residential uses of
varying densities, commercial and office uses, an elementary school, rock quarrying, and
3
recreational uses such as a golf course and hiking trails. The terrain located within Stone
Canyon is quite diverse; the northern portions of the development (those requested to be
annexed) are characterized by gently rolling pastureland, while the southern part of the
development contains steep rocky canyons and bluffs. Currently, Stone Canyon does not have
sanitary sewer service. It receives water from Rogers County Rural Water District #3, and lies
within the Limestone fire district.
The portion of the development that is proposed for annexation is under the beginning stages of
development. Three subdivisions totaling 252 acres and 174 residential lots have been approved
by Rogers County. All three of these additions are located northwest of the intersection of North
193rd East Avenue and East 66t" Street North. These neighborhoods occupy the southeastern
portion of the territory requested for annexation.
The property is bounded to the north and east by large-lot residential properties of varying
densities. Land to the south of the property is still undeveloped, while the rock quarry is situated
west of the property. To date, the staff has not received any questions or comments from
surrounding property owners.
The property is accessible via East 76`h Street North, and lies within the Rogers County Rural
Water District #3 water service area.
PROPOSED WASTEWATERLINE:
The City of Owasso is currently considering extending a 10" gravity interceptor to the western
boundary of the Stone Canyon development. The cost of such an extension is estimated to total
$4.8 million, plus $358,000 for engineering and design. It is anticipated that the developers of
Stone Canyon would then extend the sanitary sewerline into the development to serve the various
uses such as the elementary school, fire station, commercial area, multi-family area, and a
portion of the single-family area. In total, 3,843 acres both within Stone Canyon and outside
Stone Canyon could be made serviceable by the proposed sanitary sewerline. A payback in the
amount of $1,300 per acre would be required for any existing or future developments to be
connected with the sewerline.
DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISIONS BEING CONSTRUCTED WITHIN STONE
CANYON:
Three single-family subdivisions within Stone Canyon have already been approved by Rogers
County. All three of these additions are located within the eastern section proposed to be
annexed by the City of Owasso. There are houses under construction in this area. These
subdivisions are accessible via North 193rd East Avenue, and are recorded as follows:
1. Settler's Creek at Stone Canyon 48 lots 71 acres
2. Tanglewood at Stone Canyon 74 lots 93 acres
3. Lakes at Stone Canyon 52 lots 88 acres
The sizes of the single-family lots within these three developments range from 0.79 acres
(34,323 square feet) to 1.49 acres (64,913 square feet). The attached City Engineer's report
details the City's findings related to the infrastructure of the three subdivisions, synopsized
below.
4
STORMWATER DRAINAGE -
In many aspects, the stormwater drainage provided for the three subdivisions is satisfactory,
although the stormwater system falls short of meeting the requirements of the Owasso
Engineering Design Criteria.
The most concerning observation about the stormwater drainage is that there is a significant
amount of silt impacting the ditches and threatening to clog the culverts within the system. If the
capacity of the stormwater system is to be maximized, this silt will have to be removed.
All three of the new subdivisions drain to the west through Stone Canyon property to a basin that
will be used to provide detention for almost all of Stone Canyon - a proposed 60 to 80 acre lake
to be located in the western section requested for annexation by Owasso.
The subdivisions have been designed with borrow ditches instead of curbs, gutters, and inlets.
Sidewalks have not been designed for these subdivisions.
The basic findings of the engineering review are: 1) that the driveway culverts should be 6"
larger than the minimum diameter indicated to be appropriate by the hydraulic analysis, 2) that
the ditch velocities should be increased to at least 2.5 feet per second, and 3) that the borrow
ditches should be constructed with a trickle channel at the bottom of the ditches.
STREETS AND GRADING -
The streets within these residential subdivisions do not meet City of Owasso standards. The
major deficiencies of most concern are 1) the pavement thickness is considerably less than the
6%2" required by the City and 2) not all of the road sections are bordered with a 2' shoulder.
In order to meet the needs of local traffic, school buses, and refuse collection vehicles, the
Owasso Engineering Design Criteria call for a minimum thickness of 6%2" for street pavement.
The pavement thickness found in the subdivisions varies from 1 %2" to 4%". The staff believes
that the roads constructed in the subdivisions will have a significantly shorter life than roads built
within Owasso that meet the design criteria. The base under the roads is believed to be
acceptable. The roads' sub-base is compacted to 95% standard density; however, no sub-base
treatment (modifications with lime or fly ash) was performed to account for the presence of
plastic soils.
Some of the completed portions of the pavement are without 2' shoulders. Such shoulders
should be constructed with streets that do not have curbs and gutters, in order to provide support
for the pavement. The lack of these 2' shoulders will likely result in pavement degradation,
particularly at the pavement edge.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT -
These three subdivisions (174 lots) are intended to have private, individual, aerobic sewer
treatment systems. Further, the same amount of area (and likely another 150 to 200 lots) to the
north of these subdivisions within the territory requested for annexation has been proposed to be
5
constructed with aerobic sewer treatment systems. The City of Owasso is allowed to permit such
aerobic systems within the city limits. However, the staff has serious concerns about the long-
term viability of aerobic treatment. The maintenance of such systems will be left to the
homeowners. If the systems are not properly maintained, the City of Owasso could be
compelled to eventually provide sanitary sewer service to these residential additions if the
annexation is approved.
The Owasso Wastewater Treatment Plant does have the capacity to treat the anticipated increase
in flow resulting from the Stone Canyon development.
WATER -
Water service to Stone Canyon will be provided by Rogers County Rural Water District No. 3.
The waterline designs appear to be satisfactory for the most part. The major issue of concern
with the water system is that the fire hydrants proposed for the first three subdivisions in Stone
Canyon are two-way hydrants. These hydrants are inadequate for fire-fighting purposes. Three-
way fire hydrants should be constructed to allow for the ability to adequately fight fires.
OWASSO ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA:
The Owasso Engineering Design Criteria do not currently allow for developments that include
borrow ditches for street sections, nor do the criteria allow for aerobic systems -sanitary sewer
systems are required unless a special exemption is permitted by the Public Works Director.
The staff finds that it can be appropriate for estate developments (such as the type allowed in the
RE zoning District) with lots of at least 24,000 square feet in size to be developed without
sidewalks and with borrow ditches along street sections, provided that the streets are bordered
with a sufficient shoulder. Therefore, the staff is prepared to bring forward a recommendation
that the Engineering Design Criteria be revised to allow for streets with borrow ditches for
developments containing lots at least 24,000 square feet in size - RE zoning or larger. Further,
the staff is prepared to recommend that such developments not be required to include sidewalks.
The staff also finds that the current wastewater treatment regulations are appropriate; individual
aerobic systems should not be allowed for developments within the city limits and sanitary sewer
systems should be required for developments within the city limits.
MUNICIPAL COSTS OF ANNEXATION:
In addition to analyzing the conditions of the currently developing portion of Stone Canyon, the
staff has examined the departmental costs that annexation of the development would bring.
These costs include capital costs of constructing facilities and purchasing equipment, as well as
costs associated with acquiring new personnel and providing annual maintenance for the area.
This does not mean that all facilities, equipment, and personnel have to be accounted for
immediately; since the area will likely take several years to develop, some of the City's costs
would be able to be delayed until such time as new density and population demand.
These cost estimates are based on projections of 750 dwellings (a population of 2,000) within the
incorporated limits of Stone Canyon, and an overall population of up to 10,000 for the entire
Stone Canyon development, including that portion that will not be within the Owasso city limits.
6
PUBLIC WORKS COSTS
The largest apparent cost of annexation for the Public Works Department is the price of
extending a sanitary sewerline to Stone Canyon. The total up-front obligation for the line is
estimated at $5.158 million. While that money will be eligible for pay-back to the City as the
area in and around Stone Canyon develops, the payback is likely to occur slowly over time,
conditioned by the health of the market.
The other major capital cost to be borne in the Public Works Department would be the purchase
of a new refuse collection vehicle to serve the annexed area - $250,000.
Three new personnel would be required by the Public Works Department -one each for the
Refuse Collection Division, Wastewater Collection Division, and Stormwater Maintenance
Division. The annual cost of these personnel is estimated at $150,000.
Also, the staff estimates that $20,000 would be required for the periodic maintenance, upkeep,
and repair of infrastructure such as sanitary sewerlines, stormwater drainage systems, and streets.
The one-time costs listed above total $5.408 million, and the total annual Public Works costs are
estimated at $170,000.
POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
Based on an estimated population of two thousand residents, the staff would recommend four
patrol officers and one detective be added to the authorized sworn police force. Adding four
officers would add one officer to one of the four shifts, allowing more officers to be available
around the clock to serve the extended area. The initial cost of hiring five personnel with
equipment (such as patrol vehicles) would be approximately $490,000, with an estimated annual
salary and maintenance cost in following years of $365,000.
The one-time Police Department costs total $125,000, and the total annual Police Department
costs are estimated at $365,000.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
In order to maintain current municipal ISO ratings levels, the location and size of the Stone
Canyon development compels the staff to consider the prospect of constructing and staffing a
new fire station to serve the Stone Canyon vicinity. The cost estimate for the fire station (which
is envisioned to include a Police substation) is $2.3 million. Twelve firefighters would be
required to fully staff the new station, with an estimated annual cost of $762,000. Two new
vehicles, one fire engine and one ambulance, would be necessary to serve the new station, at a
cost of $650,000.
The one-time Fire Department costs total $2.95 million, and the total annual Fire Department
costs are estimated at $762,000.
7
SUMMARY OF TOTAL MUNICIPAL COST ESTIMATES
One Time Estimatf
Sanitary sewerline
Refuse vehicle
Police equipment
Fire station
Fire vehicles
;d Municipal Costs
$5.158 million
$250,000
$125,000
$2.3 million
$650,000
Annual Estimated Municipal Costs
Added Public Works personnel $150,000
Annual infrastructure maintenance $20,000
Added Police personnel $365,000
Added Fire personnel $762,000
Total one time costs: $8,483,000
FINDINGS:
Total annual costs:
$1,297,000
As noted above, there are several issues of concern related to the annexation of the northern two
square miles of the Stone Canyon development.
The fact that the territory remains within the Limestone Fire District means that the property
owners within Stone Canyon would be forced to pay taxes to the fire district for a fire protection
service that would be provided by the City of Owasso. Even if the territory is detached from the
district, the owners would pay ad valorem taxes until the debt currently incurred by the fire
district has been satisfied.
Most of the other concerning issues related to the Stone Canyon annexation revolve around the
condition of the three subdivisions currently under design and development. These three
subdivisions will not be on sanitary sewer systems. The stormwater drainage systems in these
areas appear to be under threat from silt infiltrating drains and culverts. The streets in the
subdivisions are not built to municipal standards. Finally, the fire hydrants proposed for the
subdivisions are inadequate for providing a municipal level of fire protection.
As a result of these infrastructure conditions, it is likely that the life of the infrastructure will be
significantly less than the life of the infrastructure had it been constructed to city standards. If
the City of Owasso chooses to annex these subdivisions, then an investment will be needed to
improve the condition of the infrastructure, likely within the next few years.
Of course, these concerns are balanced by the recognition that this area lies within the Owasso
fenceline. Because of its proximity to the development, the City of Owasso will likely be
compelled to annex the territory eventually. After all, the City of Owasso has been around for
more than 100 years and will be here 100 years from now. Similarly, this development will exist
in some form for the foreseeable future. It has been observed over time that property values in
developments outside the jurisdiction of municipal services such as public safety, public utilities,
and services such as refuse collection and code enforcement decline more rapidly than similar
developments lying within the jurisdiction of those same municipal services. This decline in
value will eventually have a detrimental impact on the values of adjacent properties that exist
within the city limits, causing the municipality to desire to annex the territory, improve the
conditions causing the drop in value, and thereby stabilize the values of incorporated properties.
Further, the residents of Stone Canyon will likely identify themselves as Owassans. They will be
included within the Owasso school district, zip code, telephone exchange, legislative districts,
and ambulance boundary. They will shop, work, eat, recreate, worship, and interact in the same
places as those who live within the city limits. Essentially, they will be us. It is important to
remember that, while the City of Owasso may not have a legal obligation to include the
development within Owasso's corporate boundaries, the City should not ignore or exclude those
who live in proximity from the municipality. Annexation is one of the most obvious and
appropriate ways to avoid such exclusion.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff is mindful that the three subdivisions currently under development within Stone
Canyon do not meet municipal standards, and that the remainder of the development has yet to
be constructed and improved. Therefore, the staff intends to recommend that the City of Owasso
annex the northern two sections of Stone Canyon with the exception of the boundaries of the
three subdivisions currently under construction, and that Stone Canyon PUD, as approved by
Rogers County, be accepted as the allowed land use distribution pattern for the annexation.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Map of area recommended to be annexed
2. Exhibit depicting Stone Canyon PUD
3. City Engineer's report dated January 15, 2008
9
o~
v
z
0
W
Z
Z
Q
C
O
C
O
v
PROPOSED ArTNEXATION I CITY OF OWASSO I
08/26/08
Legend
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSE ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO
REPRESENT AN ACCURATE AND TRUE SCALE. USE OF THIS MAP IS WITHOUT
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION BY CITY OF OWASSO OF ITS ACCURACY.
111 N. Main Street
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
918.376.1500
~"
it ~
~ t i
A
1
~ r l,~ o ~ ~•
~ • ~
~
~U :~ ., on
l ,>
_ o a
~ ~~ ~L- ~
\ M _
` - z
~ ~
Tj
/
'. ~ ~,~
~m l
> -
?,~
Y.
.
/`
~f r
. '.
~, i r_ x~
~I
~
°` ~~ h
~
~ ~ ~,
~+ ~ ..
~ r "'
i ..
Lt ^ ~
~~
w
..
.. \~
)))
r,
i
r
r'
n
~
v ,~
~`
.J
A
a
~ _ .,
<
.,,
r~.ii
:v
1
1) r.i
4 r. Y.
~
X
/ I
~ i .
'}.T.
~ ~~ '
LyFj'[a
.. _..
1 '".
--'- ~~
\\
~t.
-==--1
OWNER/DEVELOPER LANG PLANNER CIVIL ENGINEER
Owwsso LANG TRV'T PLANNING DuroN GROUP KaLa.ooo GNwNawNo
12130 E. 06m E~we~ N. 6urtF 230 3214 sd+rH Yue Aw=.: Ourre 710 0733 SouTr, 4030 Ro.
Owwa~o O<uHOrA 74035 Tuue, O~tLnNOMA 741x3 TAUU, OIILI.MOMA, 74060
Pw_ 010.272.3232 PM. 01H_326.1233 PH. 010_273.4030
Preliminary Master Plan :~~~-n `i ~.
TO: ROGER STEVENS
INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JOE JOHN NURRE, P.E.
CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA
COMPARISON -STONE CANYON DEVELOPMENT (ROGERS
COUNTY) VS. CITY OF OWASSO
DATE: January 15, 2008
BACKGROUND:
Stone Canyon is Planned Unit Development located in all or portions of Sections 35 and 36 of
Township 21 North, Range 14 East, Sections 1 and 2 of Township 20 North, Range 14 East and
Section 6, Township 20 North, Range 15 East in Rogers County. This area is generally bounded
by 76th Street North on the north, 193 East Avenue on the east, 46th Street North on the south
and 161St East Avenue on the west. Sections 35 and 36 are within the City of Owasso fenceline;
but are not within the incorporated limits. When completed, Stone Canyon will contain areas of
single-family residential (2,616 acres), multi-family residential (60 acres), commercial (90 acres),
mining (458 acres) and industrial (36 acres) development - in all, nearly 3,300 acres.
Construction of the first two residential phases of Stone Canyon, as well as perimeter fencing
and other site amenities, began in July 2007. Planning and design of the third residential phase
is currently underway. The design and construction of these phases was performed under the
provisions of a PUD initially approved by the Rogers County Planning Commission on October
6, 2005 and by the Rogers County Board of Commissioners on October 17, 2005. The Rogers
County Subdivision Regulations and the Roadway, Drainage and Detention Addendum
(September 2005) to these regulations served as governing specifications.
Subsequently, the developers of Stone Canyon requested the City of Owasso to consider the
annexation of the two sections of the development within the City's fenceline (Sections 35 and
36). This annexation would result in the incorporation of 1280 acres of constructed or proposed
development and associated infrastructure the design of which is based on criteria which differ
from the City of Owasso Engineering Design Criteria, Construction Standards and Standard
Drawings.
This memorandum is intended to compare and contrast the design and construction standards
for Stone Canyon public infrastructure as it is presently being developed with current City of
Owasso design and construction standards and to consider some of the implications of the
differences and similarities.
Documents consulted in the preparation of this memorandum include City of Owasso
Engineering Design Criteria, Construction Standards and Standard Drawings; City of Owasso
Subdivision Regulations; Rogers County Subdivision Regulations; Stone Canyon Lift Station
Report (Preliminary Draft, August 2007 -prepared by Kellogg Engineering, Inc.); Construction
Plans for The Lakes at Stone Canyon (October 2006 -prepared by Kellogg Engineering Inc.);
Hydrology Study & Engineering Report -The Lakes at Stone Canyon Phase 1(October 2006 -
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 2 of 10
prepared by Kellogg Engineering Inc.); Water Plan -The Lakes at Stone Canyon -Phase I
(Kellogg Engineering Inc. -May 2007); Stone Canyon PUD (Final Version -January 2006;
Approved -October 2005) and the Stone Canyon website (www.stonecanyonliving com).
LAND SUBDIVISION:
Lot sizes for the two subdivisions provided for review (Settler's Creek and Tanglewood) meet or
exceed City of Owasso bulk and area requirements for RE (Residential Estate) zoning. Lot sizes
in Settler's Creek range between 0.77 acres and 1.31 acres. Average lot size is 0.96 acres. Lot
sizes in Tanglewood range between 0.79 acres and 1.49 acres. Average lot size is 1.03 acres.
A 35' front yard building line is maintained on all lots; no rear yard set backs are indicated. A
minimum 10' drainage easement is provided along both side lot lines of every lot. Rear yard
utility easements correspond to City of Owasso practice. Perimeter easements are 17.5';
adjoining lot easements are 11'.
Some attention to topography should be addressed in the consideration of possible annexation
of portions of Stone Canyon. Subdivision boundaries and collector streets do not necessarily
follow section line boundaries. For example, although the majority of the Tanglewood
development is situated in Section 36, T21N, R14E, some portions extend into Section 1, T20N,
R14E and Section 6, T20N, R15E. Other portions of the conceptual plan which are mostly
situated in Sections 35 and 36 also extend into other sections further to the south. Some
attention should be directed to annexation boundaries in order to eliminate the possibility of
inconsistent jurisdiction in adjacent properties.
STORMWATER SYSTEMS:
Stone Canyon/Ropers County
1. Minor culvert design by Rational Method
City of Owasso Criteria
Rational Method accepted by City of Owasso
criteria
2. Major culvert design by NRCS method
3. Minor ditch (roadway side-drains) velocities
range between 1.2 and 2.6
feet per second
4. Allows overland flow across more than two
lots
5. Allows swale (borrow) ditches to carry runoff
NRCS method recommended by Owasso
criteria for this application
Minimum ditch velocity - 2.5 feet per second
to avoid sedimentation; maximum ditch
velocity - 6.0 feet per second to prevent
erosion
Restricts overland flow across no more than 2
lots
Requires curbs, gutters, inlets and pipe
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 3 of 10
along streets
conduits -roadside channels must comply
with criteria for all other open channels
6. Minimum ditch slope - 0.6%
7. Major channel geometry - 16.0' bottom
width/2:1 side slopes (with erosion protection)
8. Minor channel geometry corresponds with
City of Owasso standards - no pilot channel
provided
9. No engineered Phase I detention
10. Allows 12" driveway culverts
11. Acceptable driveway culvert materials
include:
Smooth steel
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Corrugated metal pipe (CGMP)
High density polyethylene (HDPE)
(HDPE may only be used if driveway is 6"
concrete or thicker)
- indicated plan dimensions are for smooth-wall
pipe; culverts must be 6" larger diameter pipe
for CGMP
12. Acceptable roadway culvert materials
include:
Smooth steel
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Reinforced concrete box (RCB)
Corrugated metal pipe (CGMP)
HDPE (with 24" cover or greater)
Minimum ditch slope - 0.2%
Owasso major channel criteria geometry
includes 4.0' minimum bottom width/3.5:1 side
slopes (without erosion protection)
Roadside ditches must comply with open
channel criteria -paved bottom (pilot channel)
required to provide hard surface flow line for
cleaning and maintenance
Requires stormwater detention to be
engineered and constructed in first phase
Minimum driveway culvert is 15" (w/
recommended change to 18")
Acceptable driveway culvert materials include:
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
- HDPE and CGMP are specifically excluded
Acceptable roadway culvert materials include:
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Reinforced concrete box (RCB)
The Hydrology Study for The Lakes at Stone Canyon (Phase I) uses SCS Unit Hydrograph
methodology for developing a stormwater runoff analysis for the project. This methodology is
preferred in the City of Owasso, particularly for drainage basins larger than 60 acres. Although
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 4 of 10
the preferred methodology has been used for this report, its specific implementation would likely
not have been approved by initial Public Works review. The report is able to take advantage of
the small project area relative to the large watershed it is associated with to show no adverse
effects on downstream property and no need for temporary or permanent detention.
This should in no way imply a criticism of the report - it reflects an analysis performed during
the early stages of a particularly large development without reference to other portions of the
conceptual plan. Both the Stone Canyon PUD and this report reference a primary on-site
detention pond/lake with a surface area in excess of 60 acres as part of the conceptual plan.
The report best serves to point out the need for a comprehensive drainage master plan for the
development which would reflect the multiple land uses and relative sizes of the development
areas.
Because design features such as open side ditches without curbs, gutters, and inlets do not
reflect the typical urban environment, no provision for their construction is included in the City of
Owasso Engineering Design Criteria. These features may, however, be appropriate for the sort
large acreage, estate lots proposed for Stone Canyon. If these improvements are designed
using sound engineering practice to provide efficient stormwater conveyance through the
development and ease of maintenance over their design life, there is no reason not to allow
their use in selected, large-lot areas in Stone Canyon.
The reduction in flow area over time in both open ditches and culverts by silt deposits is the
single biggest argument against the use of these features in an urban environment. Secondarily,
they use a large portion of the right-of-way and reduce or eliminate the ability to serve
pedestrian needs with sidewalks.
To address these concerns, we recommend:
- Driveway culverts should be oversized 6" larger than the minimum diameter indicated by
the hydraulic analysis. This would considerably extend the design life of the system prior
to maintenance activities such as culvert cleaning and ditch shaping and restoration.
- Initial hydraulic design should provide for ditch velocities of no less than 2.5 feet per
second. An advantage of large estate lots is the reduction of total stormwater runoff
because of the relatively small ratio of impervious area to overall lot size. However, this
reduction may result in slower runoff velocities, which lead to greater amounts of silt in
ditches and pipes. Sufficient velocity to clear the ditch "naturally" should be provided for
in the design.
- Open side ditches should be constructed with a small concrete pilot channel or trickle
channel at the flowline between culverts and other structures. While this would represent
an additional increment of initial work (and cost) during construction, it would greatly
facilitate ditch maintenance and reduce ditch erosion over the design life.
- Sidewalks are problematical for this sort of construction. Unless a sidewalk easement is
provided for on the property side of the drainage ditch back-slope, no area is available
within the right-of-way for construction of these features.
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 5 of 10
STREETS;
Stone Cannon/Ropers County
1. Typical section indicates 50' right-of-way
with 5' D/E, U/E each side
City of Owasso Criteria
Typical section indicates 50' right-of-way.
Roadway, sidewalk and utilities all contained
within this dimension.
2. Typical section street width shown as 24' -
Rogers County subdivision regulations require
curb and gutter "inside municipal jurisdiction"
3. Sub-base compacted to 95% of Standard
Density. No requirements for modifications for
plastic soils (PI>10).
4. Typical section indicates 6" of 1-1/2"
compacted aggregate (no gradation
specification) as roadway base
5. Typical section indicates asphalt surface
course to be depth required by Rogers County
specifications - no depth indicated on drawings.
6. Street names by plat
7. No apparent requirement for sidewalks
8. Dedicated cross-walks may be required for
blocks exceeding 1,200 feet.
9. Cul-de-sac right-of-way radius - 60';
pavement radius - 45'
Typical section street width is 26' face- of-curb
to face-of-curb.
Sub-base compacted to 95% of Standard
Density. Sub-base modified with lime or flyash
for plastic soils (PI>10).
Typical section requires 8" of ODOT Type "A"
aggregate as roadway base (or treated and
compacted sub-base as above).
Typical section requires 6-1/2" of asphalt (6"
of concrete) for roadway surface course.
Street names to follow Tulsa County system
Sidewalks required
Dedicated cross-walks may be required for
blocks exceeding 800 feet.
Cul-de-sac right-of-way radius - 55'; pavement
radius - 45'
A visual inspection of the constructed pavement at "The Lakes at Stone Canyon" (Settler's
Creek and Tanglewood subdivisions) indicates considerable (and inconsistent) deviation from
the construction drawings provided to Public Works for review. Some deviation in width is to be
expected for asphalt roads without curb and gutter and the constructed product is within an
acceptable range for this dimension (no less than 24'; no greater than 25'). However, depth of
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 6 of 10
the roadway courses varies considerably. No sub-base was available for inspection; but
aggregate base appeared to meet or exceed the required dimensions. Most aggregate base for
residential sections was no less than 8" thick and predominately as much as 10" thick. Base for
residential collectors was as much as 12" thick. Thickness of the asphalt surface course was as
little as 1-1/2" thick and as great as 4-1/2" thick. The design engineer has informed Public
Works that the intended asphalt thickness for the constructed surface course is 3 ". Public
Works has scheduled pavement borings and sub-surface investigations at 10 locations
throughout the development to provide more accurate measurements of the constructed
dimensions.
Although the plan version of the typical section provides for 2' shoulders as part of the
construction, these shoulders were not observed on the completed portions of the pavement. It
is extremely important -particularly in fill sections -that these shoulders and the associated
side-ditch foreslopes be carefully constructed and compacted. These features provide lateral
support to the paving section and prevent migration of the base from beneath the surface
course. Failure to exercise diligence in this construction will result in limited paving life,
particularly at the pavement edge.
The City of Owasso has determined, through experience, that 6-1/2" of asphalt surface course
represents a minimum dimension for streets in an urban environment. Not only must these
streets meet the needs of local traffic, but they must also regularly carry the heavier loads of
school buses and refuse collection vehicles. Although the extensive use of aggregate base at
Stone Canyon goes far in producing a typical section equivalent to (or better than) the standard
Owasso section, it must be combined with a surface course which meets the needs of urban
traffic. Public Works is prepared to consider deviations from the standard section provided they
are prepared by a licensed professional engineer and are based on realistic estimates of current
and projected traffic loads.
SANITARY SEWER:
Proposed initial phases of Stone Canyon -currently either in design or under construction -
include:
Settler's Creek 71 Acres 48 Lots
Tanglewood 93 Acres 74 Lots
Lakes at Stone Canyon - Ph III 88 Acres 52 Lots
These first phases are intended to have private, individual, aerobic sewer treatment systems.
These systems are small process units designed to digest organic matter and settleable solids
in an oxygenated environment to produce a clarified liquid which is applied to the ground
surface by sprinkler jets. The units represent a relatively new technology for providing sanitary
sewer treatment for low population density areas for which the cost of conventional gravity
sewers would be prohibitive. The design, construction and maintenance of these units are
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 7 of 10
governed by the requirements of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Individual
and Small Public On-site Sewage Treatment Systems.
The City of Owasso requires all developments within the municipal jurisdiction to connect to its
sanitary sewer collection system. While there are likely some isolated homes or areas in the city
still served by septic systems as a result of a relic condition prior to annexation, no provisions
for private, individual treatment systems, either aerobic or septic, are included in the
Engineering Design Criteria and Construction Standards. However, the criteria allow sufficient
latitude on the part of the Public Works Director to permit systems such as these by special
exemption.
The area of Stone Canyon more or less south of 66th Street North is topographically challenged
for the extension of a gravity sanitary sewer collection system. The design engineer has
proposed, as part of the Stone Canyon Lift Station Report, that this area of the development
also be served by individual treatment systems. This area consists of 1316 gross acres, of
which 785 acres are indicated as available far development. The most recent conceptual plan
shows 539 lots in this area which is consistent with the lot size and density established for the
Lakes at Stone Canyon.
After deducting the areas reserved for private treatment systems as well as the areas reserved
by the PUD for mining and industrial land uses, the remainder of the development more or less
north of 66th Street North is potentially available to be served by sanitary sewer provided by the
City of Owasso. This area consists of 1198 gross acres. Several potential land uses are
indicated by both the recent conceptual plan and the lift station report including:
- Single family homes
- Patio homes
- Park homes
- Garden villas
- Commercial development
- School site
- Church sites
- Park land
- Sports facilities and playing fields
- 80 acre lake
The developer has indicated in the PUD document the need for significant flexibility in creating
land use areas to create a quality development consistent with marketplace demands. While
this flexibility is a necessity, given the extent of the development, it makes infrastructure
planning somewhat problematical. Stipulations and agreements associated with the land
transactions with the prior owner's require definite amounts of open space and general use
property. It is likely that these agreements will limit the density in this area.
After deducting the areas reserved for such use, including park land, sports facilities and the 80
acre lake, the lift station report states that 890 net acres are available for development. Without
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 8 of 10
reference to any particular or definite land use and development plan, the report stipulates a
load on the collection system equivalent to the load generated by 1000 single family homes.
This proposed load could potentially be generated by any possible combination of the remaining
land uses indicated. Without the benefit of more specific development plans, it represents a
reasonable estimate of likely sewer demand.
When investigating the feasibility of extending an interceptor sewer along a 76th Street North
alignment, Public Works considered the possibility of opening other areas of the basin for
potential development. While these areas are not as extensive as the Stone Canyon
development and have already experienced some development, they represent additional
potential for both commercial and residential development. In all, approximately 1563 gross
acres or 1094 net acres are available for sanitary sewer service in areas north of 76th Street
North, east of 193~d East Avenue and south of 76th Street North in Section 34. Based on the
same ratio of load to area developed for the northern portions of Stone Canyon (1.12 lots/acre),
this area has the potential to generate the equivalent load of 1229 lots (of which between 350
and 375 are already developed).
The City's wastewater systems consultant, Greeley & Hansen, has developed a conceptual
estimate for a proposed gravity interceptor sewer to serve the 76th Street North corridor. An 18"
gravity sewer along a 76th Street North alignment from a connection to the Elm Creek
Interceptor to the 76th Street North and 161St East Avenue intersection (approximately 1.5 miles)
has an estimated construction cost (for planning purposes) of $2,378,000. A 10" sewer
extending an additional 0.67 miles east from 161St East Avenue has an estimated construction
cost of $665,000. Total project costs are $3.1 million.
Combining possible project costs with proposed service units in both Stone Canyon and the
adjacent portions of the basin develops a potential payback cost of $1400 per service unit or
service connection.
Wastewater collection and treatment system improvements downstream of this development
insure that the City of Owasso has the capacity to convey and treat the anticipated increase in
flow. Based on 2005 Wastewater Master Plan recommendations, design work is currently
underway to increase treatment plant capacity from 3.3 MGD (average) to 4.5 MGD and 4.5
MGD (peak) to 6.2 MGD. Additional improvements include renovation of the 117th Street Lift
Station to increase capacity to 10 MGD. Construction of these improvements is anticipated to be
completed by Fall/Winter 2009. Funding is by low interest Clean Water State Revolving Fund
loans.
Subsequent to completing these improvements, the Elm Creek Interceptor becomes a limit to
capacity. The Wastewater Master Plan anticipates this need and recommends replacement (or
augmentation) of the lower end of this line in FY 2010-2011 to provide the equivalent of 42" of
pipe diameter. Projected costs are $1.45 million.
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page9of10
WATER:
Domestic water supply for the Stone Canyon development is provided by Roger County Rural
Water District No. 3. All engineering design and construction is governed by Rogers County
Rural Water District #3 Standard Details and Specifications. The City of Owasso has been
fortunate to enjoy a good working relationship with the water district, particularly in urban areas
where the jurisdiction of the two entities overlaps. Engineering and construction criteria for both
entities are similar (or identical) and both must meet or exceed the requirements of the
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Public Water Supply Construction Standards.
Public Works was able to review water plans provided by Kellogg Engineering for the two sub-
divisions -Settler's Creek and Tanglewood -currently under construction at Stone Canyon. As
designed, this system is consistent with City of Owasso criteria including pipe sizes and
material, sleeved crossings and suitable backfill material under streets. The system is internally
looped with no dead-end lines and has effective provisions for connections to future phases.
However, the proposed design differs from City of Owasso criteria in three important areas:
- All cul-de-sacs shown in the plans are served by 2" lines. While this is not accepted
practice in the City of Owasso, it is common practice in the rural water districts.
Acceptance of this design relies on an interpretation of ODEQ requirements. The Public
Water Supply Construction Standards require a minimum main size of 6" in diameter for
all systems providing fire protection. This is often construed to mean that any line that
serves a fire hydrant must be 6" or larger; but that lines providing domestic service only
may be smaller. In these systems, hydrants are provided at the cul-de-sac entrance; but
no closer. This could be a disadvantage in fighting a fire in a deep (greater than 300
feet) cul-de-sac.
- Depth of bury for the proposed water line is indicated by plan note as 36". This
requirement is identical to City of Owasso specifications and exceeds the ODEQ
requirement of 30". The requirement is intended to protect the main from freezing or
physical damage. However, when considering the Stone Canyon system, some
provision should be made for those occasions when the line intersects the open
drainage. Rogers County specifications require the roadway side-ditches to be 2 feet
(minimum) below the top of subgrade. Depending on the elevation of the existing soil
relative to the roadway at the time the water line was constructed, this installation could
leave as little as 12" of cover at the bottom of ditch. This condition could be easily
addressed by an additional plan note or special detail to govern construction.
- Hydrants shown on the water plans are indicated as two-way hydrants. These hydrants
are not sufficient for fire-protection purposes. Both City of Owasso criteria and ODEQ
Public Water Supply Construction Standards require three-way hydrants having a 4-1/2
inch pumper outlet and two 2-1/2 inch hose outlets for all systems providing fire
protection. ODEQ requires that hydrants be located and spaced in accordance with
American Insurance Association requirements. City of Owasso criteria require that
hydrant spacing and location be approved by the Fire Marshall. It is essential that all
features of the water supply system, including hydrants, hydrant location, line size and
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison -Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 10 of 10
flow and demand capacity, meet or exceed the requirements of the International Fire
Code and the American Insurance Association.
5D'
26'
~-SIDEWALK
(T~'P)
(MAX.)
TYPICAL SECTION
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
90% STD. DENSITY.
6" 4,000 PSI PORTLAND
- ~ CEMENT CONCRETE
13'
2%
SAWED LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION
JOINT WITH DOWEL BARS, SEE STD. DETAIL STRT 14.
#6 x 18" SMOOTH
13' DOWELL BAR AT
24" C/C.
nU``) ,.;~Ov,.`"G''3-v~ cJC:ynsJ~yn.-,C'-'' '.i~nG~'~t-Q`~"r~{l`":' C~.~ _ - .A.;
r n ^, v t'~ u f7 Gn '~ G r t ~J a.~ ra ~_ "s Ci :~,
~ I I nn
HALF SECTION
INTEGRAL CURB 81 PAVEMENT
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
90% STD. DENSITY.
-MINIMUM 8" ODOTTYPE "A" AGGREGATE
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
CONCRETE STREET SECTION
SUBGRADE AND
BASE COMPACTED
1' BEYOND BACK OF CURB.
HALF SECTION
SEPARATE PLACEMENTS
2" ODOT TYPE "B" INSOLUBLE SURFACE
4 1/2" ODOT TYPE
"A" INSOLUBLE BASE 6"CURB
~~~ ._, /SEE STRT-07.
PRIME COAT TACK COAT
n!'~U..:n~`1 '-'•; t1n`~- ;O" ~J'OnO~' 'J '~vti C`~.., {~'t'1
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE STREET SECTION
NOTES:
1. SECTIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
SUBGRADE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
THICKNESS OF MODIFICATION OR A SUBBASE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHERE SEVERE SOIL
CONDITIONS EXIST.
2. FOR EXISTING SUBBASE MATERIAL WITH PI <10
SUBGRADE SHALL BE CLASSIFIED SELECT, INERT
MATERIAL OR STABILIZED AND COMPACTED
TO 95°/D STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
3. ASPHALT SURFACES SHALL CONFORM TO
ODOT STANDARD 401.04 FOR TOLERANCES AND
STANDARD DETAIL STRT-O8 FOR TEXTURE.
4. IF A COMPACTED AGGREGATE SUBBASE IS USED,
THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED ON
SEPARATOR FABRIC.
0
F
in
F-
w
w
rn
J
w
0
0
a
0
z
r
SUBGRADE AND
BASE COMPACTED
1'BEYOND
BACK OF CURB.
P.EVISION 6V DATE RESIDENTIAL MINOR STREET
STANDARD DETAILS
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
OAiE' OS/O5 STANDAg0 N0
STRT-01
`~ ~!~ f:
/~ i ~ y
60'
a 3
1' 4' 36' 4' ~ 1.
~.~ ~P
2% 1/4" /ft. 2% 1/4" /ft.
SIDEWALK 4°/D (~Pjft.) 2% (1/4" /ft.)
(( (MAX.)
TYPICAL SECTION
SAWED LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION
COMPACT TO MINIMUM 6" 4,000 PSI PORTLAND JOINT WITH DOWEL BARS, SEE
90% STD. DENSITY. CEMENT CONCRETE STANDARD DETAIL STR-14
18' 18'
#6 x 24" SMOOTH
DOWEL BAR AT
24" TO 30" C/C
".d t7 •- 'd,,rzvd~vd`~ (;'J~'"r,C.'~~ d=7 yOd .-,Cfiu.:;f't'S^'..rjt%' C~,~,Ci`%.." f3`>t-~+fJ"' .~
(~1 ~ h
1' g" 8,. 1.
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95°/D STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE SUBGRADE AND
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME SUBBASE COMPACTED
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2. 1' BEYOND
BACK OF CURB.
HALF SECTION CONCRETE STREET SECTION HALF SECTION
INTEGRAL CURB & PAVEMENT SEPARATE PLACEMENTS
2" ODOTTYPE "B" INSOLUBLE SURFACE
COMPACT TO MINIMUM 6" ODOTTYPE 6" CURB
90% STD. DENSITY. aA" INSOLUBLE BASE SEE STRT-07
18' 18'
PRIME COAT TACK COAT (TYP)
~r~\/5/\ ~' ~{ rr~ ...- ~ r ,~ 2% (114"/ft.) r ~~,,~/j^`\%~~~
%`.''f\~~\ f dv"h~r/` ~vh~~, ~J~J!?~JG:; ,;d'~^.drr ~70`%hO .-.v C.;~ ~;..
\~\~\-\/+`\\, ,~ / 4 ~/ \ \/ n ~ ~ Y z/ r C • ~' ~ ~1 i) jr~ ^ Jl r fw J! r. ~~ ~ ~j~/~ ~%
'~=~+ MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE 1'
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95°/D STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME SUBGRADE AND
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2. SUBBASE COMPACTED
1' BEYOND
BACK OF CURB.
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE STREET SECTION
NOTES:
1. SECTIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
SUBGRADE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
THICKNESS OF MODIFICATION OR A SUBBASE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHERE SEVERE SOIL
CONDITIONS EXIST
2. FOR EXISTING SUBBASE MATERIAL WITH PI <10
SUBGRADE SHALL BE CLASSIFIED SELECT, INERT
MATERIAL OR STABILIZED AND COMPACTED aEVI510N BY OhiE RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREET
TO 95 % STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
3. ASPHALT SURFACES SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD DETAILS
ODOT STANDARD 401.04 FOR TOLERANCES AND
STANDARD DETAIL STRT-08 FOR TEXTURE. CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
4. IF A COMPACTED AGGREGATE SUBBASE IS USED, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED ON
SEPARATOR FABRIC. - ENGINEERING DIVISION
DATE' OSIOS STP.NDPP.O NO_
STRT-02
0
F-
w
w
J
H
w
O
0
0
z
3NIi 3/ll ~ 3/d W
~o
W~
O~
N
Z ~M
b o ~ o
`~ ~ -+ ~ °
~ ~U~Z Wm ~
~ ~ ~~ ~~~
~ ~ y~~
W m O ~W=
j h ~~~
~y ~ ~ W
\ ~ ~ h
V~
O R
~~ ~ ~ ~2~
o~ I g N ~ 2pp W~V
^'~ ~ 2 O lai)
h
N
•'
O
J ~y
0 \ ~ ~~
O ~ ~ G~
h U yg rr~~
m `~ ~+1
4
~~
°' ~ N
m
~~ 0 Z
O~
w
UyU
''~ ~' ya
U~~ ~~i
b ~ ~ W Fr
o ~ b`~~
N ~ ~~ W~~~
UV
W = U ZV k
<~ < W \o~
~~ ~=~~
~ ~
~~
O Zj
h ~ N
~O I H
f ~ ~(L~
N ~( ~ p~~ m~~K
~ ~~~ ~~~cL ~~~
2 ~ ~~~ ~ p z 5p~~ o i~~~
~ ~ 2 O ~~F W
~ m ~~~~~
>WG~~
oho
~"~~~
o
o~~~~
3Nn 3/n ~ 3/a z Z ~ o ~
r
ROGERS COUNTY ROADWAY SPECIFlCATIDNS:
1. RIGHT OF WAY.• FIFTY (50) MINIMUM WIDTH, WITH ADDITIONAL 5' D/E & U/E EACH SIDE.
2. DRAINAGE PlPE.- MINIMUM LENGTH OF FORTY (40) FEET
3. HEADWALLS: ALL DRAIN PIPE OR TILE WILL BE FURNISHED WITH A POURED IN PLACE
CONCRETE HEADWALL ON BOTH ENDS ACCORDING TO DATE SHEET SH 202 A.
4. COMPACTION: UPPER TWELVE (12) INCHES OF DIRT BASE OF THE ROAD SURFACE MUST
MEET 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY TEST PERFORMED AND CERTIFlED.
5. ROAD SURFACE: DRRING SURFACE W111 BE A MINIMUM OF TWENTY FOUR (24) FEET WIDE.
6. ROAD SURFACE MATERIAL: ROAD SURFACE SHALL BE CROWNED JN THE CENTER WITH
DRAINAGE TO BOTH SIDES AND BE A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6°)
OF 1-1/2' AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
7. SHOULDERS: 7W0 (2) FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ROAD SURFACE.
8. DRAINAGE AREA: ELEVEN (11) FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ROAD SURFACE OUTSIDE OF
SHOULDER REQUIREMENTS WITH MAXIMUM BACK SLOPE OF THREE (3)
TO ONE (1) BOTH SIDES.
9. CUL-DE-SAC: WHEREVER A TURN AROUND IS REQUIRED BY 1HE PLANNING COMMISSION
A CIRCULAR TURN AROUND HAVING A MAXIMUM INSIDE RADIUS OF
FORTY FIVE (45) FEET AND A MINIMUM OUTSIDE RADIUS OF SIXTY
(60) FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED.
10. ALL CONSIRUC110N SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND DETENTION
ADDEDUM TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 2005.
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DESIGN:
A. ROADWAYS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM DITCH OF TWO FEET IN DEPTH AND
TO BE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF SUB-GRADE NOT THE TOP OF PAVEMENT.
B. BORROW DITCHES DESIGN AS FOLLOWS:
1. 4:1 MINIMUM FORE-SLOPE AND BACK-SLOPE.
2. BACKFlLLED WITH 4" MIN. TOPSOIL AND SEEDED.
3. SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN A ADDITIONAL 5' D/E & U/E
C. ALL ROADWAY CULVERTS AND STORM DR,41NS SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: SMOOTH STEEL
PIPE, RCP, RCB, CGMP, AND HOPE. HOPE CULVERTS MAY BE USED IF THERE IS AT LEAST
24-INCHES OF COVER. ALL CULVERTS SHALL HAVE ODOT STANDARD SLOPED CONCRETE END
SECTIONS OR ODOT STANDARD HEADWALLS. ALL ROADWAY CULVERTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 15"
IN DIAMETER.
D. A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE COUNTY
ALONG WITH CONSTRUC110N PLANS IN ACCORDANCE THE CURRENT ODEQ RULES AND REGULATIONS
REGARDING STORM WATER DISCHARGE.
E. HYDRAULIC GRADE LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ALL STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
F. ALL DETENTION FACILITIES SHAI1 BE DESIGNED WITH ONE FOOT (1) OF FREEBOARD DURING A
500-YEAR STORM EVENT.
G. DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL CONSIST OF SMOOTH STEEL PIPES, REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
(RCP), OR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CGMP). DRIVEWAY CULVERTS MAY BE HOPE ONLY IF THE
DRIVEWAY IS CONCRETE AND AT LEAST SIX INCHES (6°) THICK. ALL DRNEWAY CULVERTS SHALL
HAVE ODOT STANDARD SLOPED CONCRETE END SECTIONS ANY OTHER TYPE MUST BE APPROVED
BY THE COUNTY.
ALL CULVERT SPECIFICA710NS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE THE ROGERS COUNTY STANDARDS.
H. SUB-BASE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" COMPACTED 1-1/2" AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL.