HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.11.04_City Council AgendaPUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
TYPE OF MEETING:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
Regular
November 4, 2008
6:30 p.m.
Council Chambers, Old Central Building
109 N. Birch
Notice and agenda filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted at City Hall at 5:00 p.m. on
Friday, October 31, 2008. AA
J frin M. Stevens, Deputy City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
Mayor Stephen Cataudella
2. Invocation
Jim Schnorrenberg, First Christian Church
3. Flag Salute
4. Roll Call
5. Presentation of the Character Trait of Gratefulness, followed by a Public Service
Announcement.
Dr. Chris Kelley, Owasso Character Council
S \Agendas \Counci1\2008 \1 I04.doc
Owasso City Council
November 4, 2008
Page 2
6. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Council approval of the Consent
Agenda. All matters listed under "Consent" are considered by the City Council to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. Any Councilor may, however, remove an item from the
Consent Agenda by request. A motion to adopt the Consent Agenda is non - debatable.
A. Approval of Minutes of the October 21, 2008 Regular Meeting.
Attachment # 6 -A
B. Approval of Claims.
Attachment # 6 -B
C. Approval of Ordinance No. 931, an ordinance approving approval of amendments to the
Owasso Subdivision Regulations.
Attachment # 6 -C
Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 931 and has listed this item in the
consent section of the agenda based on Council actions taken October 21, 2008 to approve
the amended Owasso Subdivision Regulations.
D. Approval of Ordinance No. 932, an ordinance approving annexation request OA 08 -02,
consisting of approximately 3 acres located at 708 N. Carlsbad, 710 N. Carlsbad, and 711
N. Carlsbad.
Attachment # 6 -D
Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 932 and has listed this item in the
consent section of the agenda based on Council actions taken July 15, 2008 to approve the
annexation request.
E. Approval of Ordinance No. 933, an ordinance approving annexation request, OA 08 -03, a
consisting of approximately 10 acres, more or less, located north of E. 96th Street North
and east of N. 136th East Avenue.
Attachment # 6 -E
Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 933 and has listed this item in the
consent section of the agenda based on Council actions taken October 21, 2008 to approve
the annexation request.
Owasso City Council
November 4, 2008
Page 3
7. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Council acceptance of the Main
Street Streetscape Enhancement Project and authorization for final payment to Crossland
Heavy Contractors in the amount of $84,434.09.
Mr. Feary
Attachment # 7
Staff will recommend Council acceptance of the Main Street Streetscape Enhancement Project
and authorization for final payment to Crossland Heavy Contractors in the amount of
$84,434.09.
8. Consideration and appropriate action relating to a request for Council approval to annex a
portion of Stone Canyon, a planned unit development.
Mr. Wiles
Attachment # 8
Staff will recommend Council approval to annex into the city limits of Owasso the northern
most two square miles of the Stone Canyon Planned Unit Development, located between N.
161s' East Avenue and N. 193rd East Avenue, south of E. 76th Street North.
9. Report from City Manager.
10. Report from City Attorney.
11. Report from City Councilors.
12. New Business (New Business is any item of business which could not have been foreseen at
the time of posting of the agenda.)
Owasso City Council
November 4, 2008
Page 4
13. Adjournment.
OWASSO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
The Owasso City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 in the Council
Chambers at Old Central per the Notice of Public Meeting and Agenda posted on the City Hall
bulletin board at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 17, 2008.
ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Cataudella called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.
ITEM 2. INVOCATION
The invitation was offered by Reverend Nathan Burns, Silver Creek Church of the Nazarene.
ITEM 3. FLAG SALUTE
Council Bonebrake led the flag salute.
ITEM 4. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Steve Cataudella, Mayor
D.J. Gall, Vice Mayor
Doug Bonebrake, Councilor
Wayne Guevara, Councilor
A quorum was declared present.
STAFF
Rodney Ray, City Manager
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
ABSENT
Jon Sinex, Councilor
ITEM 5. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes of the October 7, 2008 Regular Meeting and October 14,
2008 Special Meeting.
B. Approval of Claims.
Owasso City Council
October 21, 2008
C. Acknowledgement of receiving the monthly FY 2008 -2009 budget status report.
D. Authorization for the City Manager to execute a contract for Property Casualty
Insurance in an amount not to exceed $27,826.
E. Authorization for the City Manager to execute a contract for Excess Insurance
Coverage for Workers' Compensation in the amount of $31,409.
F. Authorization for the City Manager, Rodney J. Ray, to act as the Senior
Administrator of the Red Flag Identity Theft Prevention Program for the City of
Owasso.
G. Acceptance of the Sanitary Sewer System, Streets, and Stormwater Drainage
System constructed for the Crescent Ridge residential development located east
of N. Garnett Road between E. 116th Street North and E. 126th Street North.
H. Acceptance of the Streets and Stormwater Drainage System constructed for the
Lake Valley II residential development located northeast of the intersection of
E. 106th Street North and N. 145th East Avenue.
I. Acceptance of the Sanitary Sewer System constructed for the Kum & Go
located at the northeast corner of E. 86th Street North and N. 145th East Avenue.
J. Acceptance of the Sanitary Sewer and Water Systems constructed for the Center
at Owasso located at E. 96th Street North and N. 121St East Avenue.
K. Acknowledgement of receiving Agreements for Urban Engineering Services
from Crafton, Tull, Sparks and Associates; Kellogg Engineering; and,
authorization for the Mayor to execute each agreement.
Mr. Guevara moved, seconded by Mr. Bonebrake, to approve the Consent Agenda with
claims totaling $661,708.01. Also included for review were the healthcare self - insurance claims
report and payroll payment report for pay period 10/11/08.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 6. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION REQUEST OA 08 -03, A
REQUEST TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
LOCATED NORTH OF EAST 96TH STREET NORTH AND EAST OF NORTH
136TH EAST AVENUE
P)
Owasso City Council October 21, 2008
Ms. Darnaby presented the item, recommending Council approval of Annexation Request OA
08 -03, a request to annex approximately 10 acres, more or less, located north of East 96" Street
North and east of North 136th East Avenue.
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Guevara, for Council approval of Annexation Request
OA 08 -03, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 7. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR THE CENTER AT
OWASSO AMENDED, PROPOSING TO AMEND THE DIMENSIONS OF LOTS
2 AND 3, BLOCK 1, OF THE CENTER AT OWASSO, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 96TH STREET NORTH, IMMEDIATELY WEST OF
NORTH 121sT EAST AVENUE
Ms. Darnaby presented the item, recommending Council approval of The Center at Owasso
Amended Final Plat, as recommended.
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Gall, for Council approval of the Amended Final Plat
for The Center at Owasso.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 8. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE OWASSO
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Mr. Wiles presented the item recommending Council approval of the update of the Owasso
Subdivision Regulations.
Mr. Guevara moved, seconded by Mr. Bonebrake, for Council approval of the update of the
Owasso Subdivision Regulations, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
3
Owasso City Council
October 21, 2008
ITEM 9. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
OWASSO AND THE TULSA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR SERVICES
RELATED TO AN EXPRESS COMMUTER BUS SERVICE AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT FOR SUCH SERVICE
This item was tabled.
ITEM 10. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL TO PURCHASE FIVE POLICE SERVICE
VEHICLES IN THE AMOUNT OF $108,946
Chief Yancey presented the item, recommending Council approval to purchase five (5) Ford
Crown Victoria vehicles from United Ford of Tulsa and authorization for payment in the amount
of $108,946.00.
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Guevara, for Council approval to purchase five Ford
Crown Victoria vehicles from United Ford of Tulsa and authorization for payment in the amount
of $108,946.00, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 11. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF OWASSO DEBRIS
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Mr. Rooney presented the item, recommending Council adoption of the City of Owasso Debris
Management Plan.
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Guevara, for Council adoption of the City of Owasso
Debris Management Plan, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
4
Owasso City Council
October 21, 2008
ITEM 12. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION FOR FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $19,873.47 TO AT &T FOR UTILITY RELOCATION ASSOCIATED WITH
THE MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Mr. Rooney presented the item recommending Council authorize the final payment to AT &T in
the amount of $19,873.47 for the relocation of telephone and data lines in association with the
Main Street Improvement Project.
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Gall, for Council authorization of the final payment to
AT &T, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 13. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION FOR FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $59,347.65 TO OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION
ASSOCIATED WITH THE NORTH 129TH EAST AVENUE WIDENING
PROJECT
Mr. Feary presented the item, recommending Council authorize the final payment to Oklahoma
Natural Gas in the amount of $59,347.65 for utility distribution pipelines in association with the
North 1291h East Avenue Widening Project.
Mr. Gall moved, seconded by Mr. Bonebrake, for Council authorization of final payment to
Oklahoma Natural Gas in the amount of $59,347.65, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 14. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE THREE
LAKES POND DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT, ACCEPTANCE OF THE
COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,206.84 TO FIT CONSTRUCTION
Mr. Feary presented the item, recommending Council approval of Change Order No. 1 to the
Three Lakes Pond Dam Replacement Project in the amount of $2,105.43, acceptance of the
completed construction project with a revised total contract amount of 364,136.89, and
authorization for final payment in the amount of $18,206.84 to FIT Construction.
Owasso City Council October 21, 2008
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Guevara, for Council approval of the change order to
the Three Lakes Pond Dam Replacement Project, acceptance of the project and authorization for
final payment, as recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 15. CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO A REQUEST
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF OWASSO AND TULSA COUNTY FOR SERVICES RELATED TO
THE FY 2008 -2009 STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
Mr. Feary presented the item recommending Council approval of an Interlocal Agreement
between the City of Owasso and Tulsa County for paving assistance associated with the FY
2008 -2009 Street Rehabilitation Program and authorization for the Mayor to execute the
Agreement.
Mr. Guevara moved, seconded by Mr. Bonebrake, for Council approval of an Interlocal
Agreement between the City of Owasso and Tulsa County for paving assistance, as
recommended.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 16. REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER
Mr. Ray reminded all of the TTC groundbreaking scheduled for October 22.
Mr. Ray also gave an update on the Hwy 169 Widening Project.
Fire Chief Bradd Clark reported to Council that the Insurance Service Office (ISO) has recently
started the evaluation of Owasso's overall fire protection service.
ITEM 17. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY
No report
Owasso City Council October 21, 2008
ITEM 18. REPORT FROM CITY COUNCILORS
The Councilors remarked on the success of Owasso's Lady Rams Volleyball team who recently
took first at State Finals.
ITEM 19. NEW BUSINESS
None
ITEM 20. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Bonebrake moved, seconded by Mr. Guevara, to adjourn.
YEA: Bonebrake, Cataudella, Gall, Guevara
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
Pat Fry, Minute Clerk
7
Stephen Cataudella, Mayor
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description IPayment
Amount
GENERAL JOWASSO
GOLDEN AGERS IREIMB
GOLDEN AGERS
700.00
TOTAL GENERAL 700.00
MUNICIPAL COURT
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2.51
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
TRAINING - FOWLER
100.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSE
32.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS
CITATION BOOKS
998.00
AMERICAN MUNICIPAL SERVICES LTD
COLLECTION FEES
727.75
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
31.45
TOTAL MUNICIPAL COURT 1,891.71
MANAGERIAL
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
31.97
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
21.84
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OSU- REGISTRATION FEE
225.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
8.59
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
31.76
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
31.96
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
78.83
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
9.77
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
116.99
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
18.20
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
47.59
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS -GATE
29992
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING -RAY
112.75
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
7.70
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
53.73
WARREN POWER & MACHINERY, L.P
DOZER RENTAL FOR TEMP ACC
1,102.75
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE -RAY
134.71
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OK MUN LEAGUE - TRAINING
75.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
61.44
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
UNITED - BAGGAGE FEE
25.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
UNITED - AIRFARE
218.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING -TROUT
136.18
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
35.59
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING -TROUT
792.43
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
34.68
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
43.70
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
27.17
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
277.36
L & M OFFICE FURNITURE, INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
195.29
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
OML ANNUAL CONFERENCE - R
795.00
OWASSO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LEADERSHIP OWASSO 2009 RE
495.00
TOTAL MANAGERIAL 5,545.90
Page 1
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amouni
FINANCE
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
45.07
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE
31.87
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING - ISAACS /FENNELL
223.24
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING - ISAACS /FENNELL
223.24
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
RED FLAG WORKSHOP
78.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
PARKING & MILEAGE
162.98
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE
31.96
TOTAL FINANCE 796.36
HUMAN RESOURCES
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES
79.17
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
64.06
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
RETURN CREDIT
-40.00
CHARACTER TRAINING INSTITUTE
CHARACTER INTIATIVE
457.24
URGENT CARE OF GREEN COUNTRY, P.L.L
PRE - EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREE
259.00
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 819.47
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CHARNEY, BUSS, & WILLIAMS, P.C.
LEGAL SERVICES - DETHEROW
32.09
TULSA COUNTY ELECTION BOARD
ELECTION EXPENSES - HOTEL
3,012.04
BRONZE- DEPOT.COM, INC
PUBLIC ART TIMMY & CINDY
1,995.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PAINT
184.38
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT - SUPPLIES
8 99
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
335.20
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
644.51
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC
COPIER SERVICE & SUPPLIES
540.66
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC
COPIER SERVICE & SUPPLIES
586.04
XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER SERVICE & SUPPLIES
726.56
COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS INC
MEDIA PUBLICATION /PUBLIC
117.60
COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS INC
MEDIA PUBLICATION /PUBLIC
75.60
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LAWN AMERICA -WEED CONTROL
164.80
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
36.08
TREASURER PETTY CASH
FILING FEES
65.00
TULSA COFFEE SERVICE INC
COFFEE SUPPLIES
127.58
CINTAS CORPORATION
CARPET -MAT CLEANING
25.90
i.
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 8,678.03
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TREASURER PETTY CASH
PER DIEM
40.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
T -SHIRT EXPRESS - EMBROIDER
55.35
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
15.40
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
257.95
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50.09
ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC
BLOCK PARTY BARRICADES
420.00
JUETT WEBSTER
MOWING FOR NUISANCE ABATE
200.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,039.29
Page 2
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amouni
ENGINEERING
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27.77
PRO -FENCE
NEW GATE AND OPENER FOR P
40.00
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
191.96
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEANING - UNIFORMS
7.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEAN STATION - UNIFORM
8.40
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEANING - UNIFORMS
8.40
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRY CLEANING - UNIFORMS
2.80
TOTAL ENGINEERING 286.33
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
106.48
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE -CRON
1153
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT - SUPPLIES
14.48
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PARTS
96.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING -CRON
296.37
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART -CARD STOCK
7.44
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
COX- INTERNET
1,550.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE -CRON
20.01
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DESKSHARE- SCREEN RECORDER
39.95
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BIG LOTS -USB CABLES
7 -99
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,152.25
SUPPORT SERVICES
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT -PIC HANGERS
8.98
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT -LIGHT BULBS
14.98
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
57.05
KNOLL INC
CONFERENCE TABLE FOR CITY
5,890.24
DIRT BUSTER'S INC.
PARKING LOT CLNG SVCS - 0
135.00
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
133.97
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
7.70
OKLAHOMA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS TULSA
DOC WORKER PROGRAM - SEPT
209.85
EQUIPMENT ONE RENTAL & SALES, INC.
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
44.00
COMMERCIAL POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC
GENERATOR REPAIRS CITY HA
80.00
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
28.49
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
23.99
RS WALKER INC
BATTERY FOR UPS EQUIPMENT
30.52
LIGHTING, INC
FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULBS C
101.40
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
1.22
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -WIRE NUTS
6.48
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS
6.70
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DOC LUNCHES
64.80
LIBERTY FLAGS, INC.
U.S. FLAGS
160.20
MURPHY SANITARY SUPPLY
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
100.80
RS WALKER INC
BATTERY FOR UPS
30.52
BILL BURDELL
WOODWORK REPAIR OC AUDITO
800.00
STANDARD SUPPLY LAWN & GARDEN
LAWNMOWER REPAIR PARTS
42.98
RED BUD SERVICE, INC
AIR FILTER SERVICE AT PD
40.88
Page 3
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amouni
SUPPORT SERVICES...
CARRIER COMMERCIAL SERVICE
AIR HANDLER REPAIRS CITY
307.50
ARCHITECTURAL SIGN & GRAPHICS, INC.
NAMEPLATE CITY HALL
32.00
TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES 8,360.25
POLICE SERVICES
TURN -KEY MOBILE, INC
NEW LAPTOP FOR ADDITIONAL
1,480.00
TURN -KEY MOBILE, INC
LIND POWER ADAPTER FOR PD
115.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRICON -SOT TEAM EQUIPMENT
1,273.68
PACIFIC WEST COAST SPECIALTIES
STATION 3 POLICE LOCKERS
1,292.72
A N Z SIGNS & SHIRTS, INC
VEHICLE STRIPING SERVICE
50.00
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
1,897.40
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
35.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SALES TAX REFUND
-14.17
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
484.92
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
1,161.77
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
150.92
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
169.70
DAN M YANCEY
PER DIEM
352.00
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
EQUIPMENT PART
72.90
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
116.01
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
58.05
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
985.79
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
TRANSLATION SERVICES
2528
DAVID B. ASHBY
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
483.75
POLICE PETTY CASH
REIMBURSE PETTY CASH
25.12
POLICE PETTY CASH
REIMBURSE PETTY CASH
2822
THOMSON WEST
LAW PUBLICATIONS
35.00
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL
UNIFORM EQUIPMENT
93.47
UNITED STATES SHOOTING ACADEMY
RANGE USE
3,265.00
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
188.85
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
CMI- INTOXILYZER 8000
8,118.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
360 SPORTS -BIKE PARTS
42.46
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OK POLICE SUP - UNIFORMS
259.90
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT - FOLDERS
26.06
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
NAT'L IMPRINT - HANDOUTS
643.41
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
AERKO- PEPPER SPRAY
349.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
64.58
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES 23,330.29
POLICE COMMUNICATIONS
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
VOICE & DATA - REPAIRS
328.50
POLICE PETTY CASH
REIMBURSE PETTY CASH
19.12
CENTRAL TECHNOLOGY CENTER
TRAINING
145.00
ROBERT C. JONES
PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING
170.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
OLETS EQUIPMENT & DATAMAX
450.00
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
30.80
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART - PRISONER MEALS
146.311
Page 4
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amounl
POLICE COMMUNICATIONS...
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- BATTERIES
11.76
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- PRISONER MEALS
159.72
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GEEKBRO -VIDEO CABLE
25.24
TOTAL POLICE COMMUNICATIONS 1,486.45
ANIMAL CONTROL
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- SUPPLIES
97.86
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS -LIVE TRAP
43.99
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
CAMPBELL PET -ID BANDS
57.44
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
OFFICE DEPOT -CLIP BOARDS
13.65
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
2.58
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -TRIM
25.24
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
7.70
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
41.33
HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES, INC
SHELTER SUPPLIES
47.25
HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES, INC
SHELTER SUPPLIES
52.50
FULLERTON HYDRO -TEST INC.
SHELTER SUPPLIES
33.50
DAVID B. ASHBY
UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT
125.70
SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITAL OF OWASSO,LLC
SPAY / NEUTER PROGRAM
1,260.00
HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES, INC
SHELTER SUPPLIES
52.50
TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL 1,861.24
FIRE SERVICES
BMI SYSTEMS
RENTAL OF COPIER
347.80
UNITED ENGINES, LLC
REPAIR WORK DONE ON ENGIN
2,214.00
THOMAS A. GAINES
INSTALLATION OF FIRE PUMP
706.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
CREDIT RETURN
-3.91
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TRAVEL EXPENSE -SALTS
232.20
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING -SALTS
63.39
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
22.59
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ACADEMY -BOOTS
9999
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BUMP TO BUMP -PARTS
13.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -SHOP VAC
211.86
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT -PARTS
26.07
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES- SUPPLIES
13.92
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -TOTES
54.88
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
284.68
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
297.90
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR J BE
650.00
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR GOME
150.00
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR B GO
150.00
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR J YE
650.00
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR D WO
650.00
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY- BURSAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR J LI
650.00
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
383.92
AT &T MOBILITY
WIRELESS SERVICE
21.66
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
16.03
Page 5
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amounl
FIRE SERVICES...
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PIKEPASS
6.70
TREASURER PETTY CASH
PER DIEM
117.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PAINT SUPPLIES
34.42
TOTAL FIRE SERVICES 8,064.60
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNES
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
21.94
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
9599
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DELL - REPLACEMENT COMPUTER
976.00
TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 1,093.93
STREETS
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
STANDARD LAWN- SPREAD ENGI
1,046.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES - TAPCON BITS
1794
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
IMSA- MEMBERSHIP FEE
60.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
IMSA- MEMBERSHIP FEE
60.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
IMSA- MEMBERSHIP FEE
60.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MAXWELL -DRILL BITS
34.92
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.02
GEORGE & GEORGE SAFETY & GLOVE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
50.79
PRO -FENCE
NEW GATE AND OPENER FOR P
1,531.75
GEORGE & GEORGE SAFETY & GLOVE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
26.30
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION
SWEEPER RENTAL TO CLEAN S
176.00
SIGNALTEK INC
SEPT MAINT /OCT RETAINER
737.20
APAC, INC.- OKLAHOMA STANDARD INDUST
ASPHALT FOR STREET REPAIR
190.32
APAC, INC.- OKLAHOMA STANDARD INDUST
ASPHALT FOR STREET REPAIR
265.11
ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC
BARRICADE RENTAL FOR HOME
119.60
STANDARD SUPPLY LAWN & GARDEN
SMALL SPREADERS
37.98
CROW BURLINGAME COMPANY
TEST LIGHT
11.99
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
46.20
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS,INC
SIGNAL REPAIRS FOR 96 ST
945.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BUMP TO BUMP - SANDPAPER
36.92
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -SPRAY BOTTLE
3.96
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PAINT
58.00
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
42.34
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
40.79
TOTAL STREETS 5,604.13
STORMWATER
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
54.04
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PARTS
1.72
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TULSA GRASS -SOD
200.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TULSA GRASS -SOD
150.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -PARTS
10.85
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BROWN FARMS -SOD
80.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
BROWN FARMS -SOD
80.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS- GREASE
29.90
Page 6
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amouni
STORMWATER...
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
P & K EQUIPMENT -OIL
95.98
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT - SHOVELS
37.68
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
50.50
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
61.60
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
SHIPPING CHARGE
3.33
MILL CREEK LUMBER & SUPPLY
MATERIALS FOR STEM WALL @
41.30
P & K EQUIPMENT, INC
EDGER SUPPLIES
24.80
RAINBOW CONCRETE COMPANY
9TH HOLE BERM - PIPE REPA
231.00
LOT MAINTENANCE OF OKLAHOMA, INC.
CLEAN STREETS BEFORE OVER
3,000.00
ELLIS CONSTRUCTION ACCESSORIES, LTD
FORM RENTAL FOR STEM WALL
388.80
ELLIS CONSTRUCTION ACCESSORIES, LTD
PANEL TIES FOR STEM WALL
50.24
GEORGE & GEORGE SAFETY & GLOVE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
26.30
PRO -FENCE
NEW GATE AND OPENER FOR P
1,531.75
GEORGE & GEORGE SAFETY & GLOVE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
50.78
BROWN FARMS LLC
SOD FOR SAWGRASS STORMPIP
80.00
SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
CONCRETE FOR SAWGRASS STO
820.25
SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
CONCRETE FOR SAWGRASS STO
772.00
SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
CONCRETE FOR SAWGRASS STO
1,158.00
SHERWOOD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
CONCRETE FOR SAWGRASS STO
395.00
WATER PRODUCTS OF OKLAHOMA, INC.
METER SHUT OFF VALVE PART
29.20
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
SALES TAX REFUND
-23.16
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MAXWELL -RE -BAR EPDXY
159.29
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES- LUMBER
56.50
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES- LUMBER
295.06
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GERDAU AMERISTEEL -RE -BAR
39422
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
GELLCO- SAFETY SHOES
9899
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
QUALITY -REAR TIRES
327.38
TOTAL STORMWATER 10,763.30
PARKS
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS -LIGHT
7.99
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS -BOOTS
9499
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
PUTT & JUMP - INFLATABLES
500.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
13.34
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ATWOODS- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
1.98
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WATER PROD -PVC FITTINGS
9.45
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
67.38
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
249.74
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WALMART- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
9.77
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES- FESTIVAL SUPPLIES
4.97
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -TIKI OIL
20.34
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
DRUG WAREHOUSE- TORCHES
53.82
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ARCOA- SUPPLIES
98.40
RANDY G. MISER
TRAIL REPAIRS AT CENTENNI
950.00
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL /CLEANING
16.73
MARSHA ANN SMITH
RESTROOM CLEANING
1,125.00
Page 7
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
PARKS...
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOCKE SUPPLY -ZIP TIES
3.48
AEP /PSO
ELECTRIC USE
241.65
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
201.40
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
1.62
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LOWES -DRILL BIT
7.77
TREASURER PETTY CASH
REFUND PARK RESERVATION
25.00
TREASURER PETTY CASH
DJ SERVICES
200.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
D & SONS- MOWING
1,139.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
WATER PROD -PARTS
8.77
TOTAL PARKS 5,052.59
COMMUNITY CENTER
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOBBY LOBBY - SUPPLIES
56.24
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
TMS -PAPER SUPPLIES
151.25
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
1.37
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
123.26
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
HOME DEPOT -PARTS
37.94
CHARACTER TRAINING INSTITUTE
CHARACTER INTIATIVE
35.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 405.06
HISTORICAL MUSEUM
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
71.93
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
1.31
TOTAL HISTORICAL MUSEUM 73.24
ECONOMIC DEV
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
12.99
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
LODGING - HARKINS
401.64
SPRINT
SPRINT CARDS
95.98
BAILEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
VENDOR BOOTH FEE
275.00
OWASSO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SHUTTLE TRANSPORTATION
400.00
TECHNICAL PROGRAMMING SERVICES INC
PRINTING COST
627.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
CLARITAS- SUBSCRIP RENEWAL
1,095.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
MEETING EXPENSE
35.43
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEV 2,943.04
90,947.4
FUND GRAND TOTAL
AMBULANCE SERVICE RAWLINGS CO. (SUBROGATION) AMBULANCE REFUND 1 486.60
TOTAL AMBULANCE SERVICE 486.60
AMBULANCE
AT &T MOBILITY
WIRELESS SERVICE
81.82
MEDICAL COMPLIANCE SPECIALTY INC
DISPOSAL OF MEDICAL WASTE
109.00
MEDICAL COMPLIANCE SPECIALTY INC
DISPOSAL OF MEDICAL WASTE
203.00
MEDICAL COMPLIANCE SPECIALTY INC
DISPOSAL OF MEDICAL WASTE
156.00
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
ALLMED- SUPPLIES
198.90
Page 8
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amounl
AMBULANCE...
MEDICLAIMS INC
BILLING SERVICES
5,956.86
FULLERTON HYDRO -TEST INC.
RENTAL OF OXYGEN CYLINDER
25.50
TOTAL AMBULANCE 6,731.08
7,217.6
FUND GRAND TOTAL
E911 COMMUNICATIONS AT &T OCT'08 E911 FEES 1,869.78
TOTAL E911 COMMUNICATIONS 1,869.78
1,869.7
FUND GRAND TOTAL
CEMETERY - CEMETERY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LOWES- MATERIALS 85.83
TOTAL CEMETERY - CEMETERY 85.83
85.8
FUND GRAND TOTAL
CI-STREETS
SF SHOPS INVESTORS, L.P.
REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAFFIC
84,667.00
SF SHOPS INVESTORS, L.P.
ROAD REPAIRS @ 96 ST N &
6,875.00
SF SHOPS INVESTORS, L.P.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATI
29,335.00
BECCO CONTRACTORS INC
FY 07 -08 CIP STREET REHAB
99,935.06
CRAFTON, TULL AND ASSOCIATES, INC
CONSULTING SERVICES
24,857.29
TOTAL CI -STREETS 245,669.35
245,669.3
FUND GRAND TOTAL
CITY GARAGE
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC
PARTS FOR RESALE & OPER S
81.40
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC
PARTS FOR RESALE & OPER S
601.34
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
CLUTCH REPLACEMENT -CITY T
684.79
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, INC
WIRE FOR STROBE LIGHTS
477.30
AMERIFLEX HOSE & ACCESSORIES, LLC
PARTS FOR RESALE
49.80
OCT EQUIPMENT, LLC
PARTS FOR RESALE
262.87
T & W TIRE, LP
TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLES &
2,429.53
FASTENAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES
58.80
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT
4,860.65
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS FOR RESALE
205.30
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS FOR RESALE
231.88
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS FOR RESALE
161.28
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS FOR RESALE
186.66
FRONTIER INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC
PARTS FOR 96 INT'L TRASH
1,013.60
FRONTIER INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS, INC
PARTS FOR 96 INT'L TRASH
1,228.78
AT &T MOBILITY
WIRELESS SERVICE
58.44
AT &T LONG DISTANCE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
2.76
Page 9
Claims List
11/04/08
Budget Unit Title
Vendor Name
Payable Description
Payment Amount
CITY GARAGE...
AT &T
CONSOLIDATED PHONE BILL
41.33
USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
PAGER USE
7.70
TULSA NEW HOLLAND INC
PARTS FOR FLAIL MOWER
960.51
TULSA NEW HOLLAND INC
PARTS FOR FLAIL MOWER
19.08
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
34.49
UNIFIRST HOLDINGS LP
UNIFORM RENTAL
50.99
FRN OF TULSA, LLC UNITED FORD
PARTS FOR RESALE
175.28
CLASSIC CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS FOR AMBULANCE
44.38
ENLOW TRACTOR INC
PARTS FOR 98 KUBOTA TRACT
196.63
TULSA NEW HOLLAND INC
PARTS FOR RESALE
2,481.45
WELSCO, INC.
SHOP SUPPLIES
17.45
KEYSTONE EQUIPMENT CO
PARTS FOR RESALE
104.79
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.04
P & K EQUIPMENT, INC
DOOR GLASS 2000 BACKHOE
180.00
ENLOW TRACTOR INC
PARTS FOR KUBOTA TRACTORS
100.12
OCT EQUIPMENT, LLC
PARTS FOR 2003 BACKHOE
11.96
TULSA NEW HOLLAND INC
PARTS FOR 95 BACKHOE
278.47
TOTAL CITY GARAGE 17,313.85
17,313.8
FUND GRAND TOTAL
WORKERS' COMP SELF -INS
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
7,102.54
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
450.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
1,154.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
264.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
1,604.45
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
39,619.58
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
1,154.00
CITY OF OWASSO IMPREST ACCOUNT
WORK COMP CLAIMS
264.00
TOTAL WORKERS' COMP SELF -INS 51,612.57
51,612.5
FUND GRAND TOTAL
GEN LIAB -PROP SELF INS
ATKINSON, HASKINS, NELLIS, BRITTING
ATTORNEY FEES - SPARKS
1,079.49
WOOD, PUHL & WOOD, P.L.L.0
ATTORNEY FEES - SEAMAN
951.79
WOOD, PUHL & WOOD, P.L.L.0
ATTORNEY FEES - MULLINS
240.38
TOTAL GEN LIAB -PROP SELF INS 2,271.66
2,271.6
FUND GRAND TOTAL
CITY GRAND TOTAL $416,988.18
Page 10
CITY OF OWASO
HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND
CLAIMS PAID PER AUTHORIZATION OF ORDINANCE #789 AS OF 11/04/08
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AETNA HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE 20,401.13
HEALTHCARE MEDICAL SERVICE 63,114.77
HEALTHCARE DEPT TOTAL 83,515.90
DELTA DENTAL DENTAL MEDICAL SERVICE 3,943.50
DENTAL DEPT TOTAL 3,943.50
HEALTHCARE SELF INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 87,459.40
CITY OF OWASSO
GENERALFUND
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/25/08
Department Payroll Expenses Total Expenses
Municipal Court
4,412.51
5,131.24
Managerial
18,882.81
22,164.20
Finance
12,484.43
14,856.22
Human Resources
5,983.44
7,142.66
Community Development
11,996.03
14,342.03
Engineering
11,097.87
13,125.61
Information Systems
8,405.97
10,059.93
Support Services
7,543.47
8,970.35
Police
95,906.66
115,553.50
Central Dispatch
9,556.12
11,371.53
Animal Control
2,163.20
2,568.60
Fire
87,078.09
102,562.46
Emergency Preparedness
2,732.83
3,272.28
Streets
6,583.16
7,848.88
Stormwater /ROW Maint.
7,242.19
8,615.67
Park Maintenance
8,834.12
10,471.66
Community- Senior Center
3,432.96
4,070.57
Historical Museum
2,054.82
2,460.44
Economic Development
3,645.36
4,324.07
General Fund Total
310,036.04
368,911.90
Garage Fund Total 3,948.80 3,788.80
Ambulance Fund Total 16,559.66 19,466.98
Emergency 911 Fund Total 3,185.40 3,790.49
Worker's Compensation Total 2,624.35 3,198.35
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE FOR THE UPDATE TO THE OWASSO SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS
DATE: October 29, 2008
BACKGROUND:
Last adopted on October 18, 1994, the Owasso Subdivision Regulations provide for the arrangement of
parcels of land in Owasso for residential, office, commercial, and industrial uses and for public needs, such
as streets, easements, etc. How land is divided for these various uses impacts the health, safety, economy,
and quality of life in the city to a large degree. In an effort to ensure that Owasso's quality of life regulations
are maintained in a fashion that keeps up with the modern realities of the community, the staff has
undertaken an update to the subdivision regulations.
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
At their October 13, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to discuss the
subdivision regulations update. At the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4 — 0 to recommend
approval of the proposed code. Subsequently, the Owasso City Council approved the proposed update at
their regular meeting on October 21, 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends City Council approval of Ordinance No. 931, formally documenting Council action
taken October 21, 2008 to approve the update to the subdivision regulations.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 931
2. Subdivision Regulations
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
ORDINANCE NO. 931
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE OWASSO
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, AND REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS, Title 11, Oklahoma Statutes, Section 45 -101 et seq. empower the City to
enact subdivision regulations; and
WHEREAS, The Owasso City Council deems it necessary for the carrying out of the
purpose of said acts and of promoting the health, safety and general welfare of the
community to enact an ordinance regulating the subdivision of land within Owasso; and
WHEREAS, The Owasso City Council has appointed a Planning Commission which
shall review all proposed subdivisions; and
WHEREAS, The Owasso Planning Commission conducted a public hearing relating to
the adoption of these Subdivision Regulations on October 13, 2008; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of Oklahoma Statutes, with regard to the adoption of this
ordinance have been met;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA:
SECTION ONE (1): That there is hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma, for the purposes of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare;
and to encourage the development of the community in accordance with the adopted
Land Use Master Plan; a Code known as the Subdivision Regulations of the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma, and the whole thereof, and the same are hereby adopted and
incorporated as full as if set out at length herein and from and after the effective date of
this Ordinance and all provisions thereof, shall be controlling, as set out therein within
the corporate limits of the City.
SECTION TWO (2): Rules and Regulations.
Upon adoption of this ordinance, the City Manager shall from time to time promulgate
additional Rules and Regulations for said Subdivision Regulations, or changes to existing
Rules and Regulations for said Subdivision Regulations as considered necessary. The
promulgation of such Rules and Regulations, in whole or in part, shall require the City
Manager to notify the City Council and Planning Commission in writing of the proposed
Rules and Regulations and shall require the exact language of the proposal be attached to
such notice. Such notice to the City Council shall be published in the consent agenda of a
City Council meeting for acknowledgement of Council receipt of the change(s). Upon
notification to the City Council and for a period of 30 days, the proposed Rules and
Regulations shall lay open and be subject to City Council action to disapprove either in
part or in whole. Absent action by the City Council to disapprove proposed Rules and
Regulations within the allotted time frame, such Rules and Regulations shall have the
force and effect of law.
SECTION THREE (3) Repealer
All ordinances or parts of ordinances, in conflict with this ordinance are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
SECTION FOUR (4): Severability
If any part or parts of this ordinance are held invalid or ineffective, the remaining portion
shall not be affected but remain in full force and effect.
SECTION FIVE (5): Declaring an Effective Date
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of
final passage as provided by state law.
SECTION SIX (6): Codification
The City of Owasso Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding a new ordinance
to be codified in Part 12, Chapter 3, Subdivision Regulations.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma on the 4th day of
November, 2008.
Stephen Cataudella, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sherry Bishop, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED as to form and legality this 4th day of November, 2008.
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
Proposed Changes of the Owasso Subdivision Regulations
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1 TITLE
These Regulations shall hereafter be known, cited and referred to as the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENTIONS
1.2.1 Purpose: The arrangement of parcels of land in Owasso for residential, office,
commercial and industrial uses and for public needs, such as streets and easements, etc.
will to a large degree determine the health, safety, economy and quality of life in the city.
Such amenities are a public concern. These Regulations and standards for the subdivision
of land are intended to insure the development and maintenance of a safe, healthy,
attractive and efficient community and provide for the conservation of its human and
physical resources.
1.2.2 Intentions: These Regulations are specifically intended to:
A. Establish a subdivision process that is as expeditious and efficient as possible while
providing for public health, safety and general welfare.
B. Harmoniously relate development of the various tracts of land to the existing
community and facilitate the future development of adjoining tracts.
C. Provide that the cost of improvements which primarily benefit the tract of land being
developed be borne by the owners or developers of the tract.
D. Provide the best possible design for the tract.
E. Provide a proper arrangement of streets and assure the adequacy of open spaces for
traffic and access of emergency vehicles commensurate with the intensification of land
use customarily incident to a change of zoning.
F. Reconcile any differences of interest.
G. Ensure proper legal descriptions, monumenting of land and adequate and accurate
platting and records of land subdivision.
H. Ensure that public facilities and utilities are available that will have sufficient capacity
to serve the proposed subdivision and the general community.
I. Promote development that will preserve the natural beauty and physical characteristics
of the land and will intrude upon the environment to the least possible extent.
J. Encourage designs which will require minimal maintenance of public improvements
by the City.
1.3 AUTHORITY
These Regulations and Minimum Standards for land development are adopted under the
authority granted by Oklahoma Statutes.
1.4 JURISDICTION
These Regulations shall apply to all subdivision of land located within the corporate
limits of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
1.5 SUBDIVISION PLAT REQUIREMENT AND WAIVER
For any land which has been rezoned upon application of a private party, no building
permit shall be issued until that portion of the tract on which the permit is sought has
been included within a subdivision plan or replat, as the case may be, submitted to and
approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and filed of record in the office
of the County Clerk where the property is situated. The City Council, upon a showing
that the purposes of these regulations have already been achieved by previous platting, or
could not be achieved by a plat or replat, may waive the subdivision plat requirement.
1.6 PLAT VACATION AND ALTERATIONS
No vacation of a plat or any parts thereof, except by action of the District Court, shall be
valid or impart notice until after the required consent of such platted area is presented to
the City Council and the approval of the Council is entered thereon. All vacations or
alterations of a final approved filed plat shall require the approval of the Planning
Commission and City Council and the filing of a corrected plat, approved deed or
accepted easement. Alterations of a plat without approval shall constitute a violation of
these Regulations.
1.7 VARIANCE OF REGULATIONS
Whenever the tract to be subdivided is of such unusual size or shape or is surrounded by
such development or unusual conditions that the strict application of the requirements
contained in these Regulations result in substantial hardship or inequity, the Planning
Commission may vary or modify, except as otherwise indicated, such requirements of
design, but not of procedure or improvements, so that the subdivider may develop his
property in a reasonable manner, but so that at the same time, the public welfare and
interests of the City are protected and the purpose and intentions of these regulations are
preserved. Such modification may be granted upon written request of the subdivider
stating the reason for each modification and may be waived by three- fourths (3/4) vote of
the members of the Planning Commission present, subject to the acceptance of the plat
and the dedications thereon by the City Council. Variance of the Zoning Code must be
granted by the Owasso Board of Adjustment.
1.8 PROMULGATION OF RULES AND REGULATIONS
Upon adoption of this ordinance, the City Manager shall present Rules and Regulations
relating to the implementation of the intent of the Subdivision Regulations to the City
2
Council for adoption by resolution. Provided, however, that the City Manager shall from
time to time promulgate such additional Rules and Regulations, or changes to existing
Rules and Regulations as considered necessary. The promulgation of such Rules and
Regulations, in whole or in part, shall require the City Manager to notify the City
Council, Planning Commission, and Board of Adjustment in writing of the proposed
Rules and Regulations and shall require the exact language of the proposal be attached to
such notice. Such notice to the City Council shall be published in the consent agenda of a
City Council meeting for acknowledgement of Council receipt of the change(s). Upon
notification to the City Council and for a period of 30 days, the proposed Rules and
Regulations shall lay open and be subject to City Council action to disapprove either in
part or in whole. Absent action by the City Council to disapprove proposed Rules and
Regulations within the allotted time frame, such Rules and Regulations shall have the
force and effect of law.
1.9 SEPARABILITY OF PROVISIONS
If any section, clause, paragraph, provision or portion of these regulations shall be held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
affect any other section, clause, paragraph, provision or portion of these Regulations.
1.10 PENALTY
Any person or persons, firm, or corporation, who shall violate any of the provisions of
these Regulations, or shall fail to comply therewith, or with any of the requirements
thereof, shall be deemed guilty of an offense and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined
not more than $200.00 and costs and/or 30 days imprisonment. Each day such violation
shall be permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. In addition to the other
remedies provided herein, the City may institute any proper action or proceedings to
enforce these Regulations.
1.11 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PLATS - MEMBERSHIP
The membership of the Technical Advisory Committee shall consist of one
representative of each of the following agencies and companies and such other public
officials as the City Manager may designate:
A. the City Manager,
B. the City Engineer,
C. the City Attorney,
D. the City Planner,
E. the Building Inspector,
F. the Fire Chief,
G. the City Project Manager,
H. the County Engineer of the involved county,
I. an Owasso Public Works Authority representative,
3
J. a natural gas company representative,
K. an electric company representative,
L. a cable television company representative,
M. a telephone company representative, and
N. a Planning Commission representative
1.12 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PLATS - DUTIES
It shall be the responsibility of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to meet
together on the call of the City Planner, who shall serve as chairperson, to review and
study all preliminary plats, final plats and lot splits and to submit its findings and
recommendations to the Planning Commission.
CHAPTER 2. SUBDIVISION PLAT PROCEDURES
2.1 PROCESS
2. 1.1 Requirement: Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, before any permit for
the erection of a structure in such proposed subdivision shall be granted, the owner of the
land or his agent shall apply for and secure both Planning Commission and City Council
approval of a final plat for such proposed subdivision.
2.1.2 Procedure: The proposed subdivision shall be processed as follows:
A. Pre -plat conference,
B. Application for Preliminary Plat (proposed subdivisions containing only one lot may
begin with step F of this list),
C. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) review of the Preliminary Plat,
D. Planning Commission review of the Preliminary Plat,
E. Revision of the Preliminary Plat, if required,
F. Application for the Final Plat,
G. Submission of Construction Plans for approval to Public Works and DEQ,
H. TAC review of the Final Plat,
I. Planning Commission review of the Final Plat,
J. Obtain Public Works and DEQ approval of the Construction Plans,
K. City Council review and approval of the Final Plat,
L. Certification of the Final Plat,
M. Record the certified Final Plat with the appropriate County officials, and return file -
stamped original plats to the City Planner,
O. Pre - Construction Conference,
P. Construction of subdivision improvements in accordance with the approved
Construction Plans,
0
Q. Council acceptance of subdivision improvements.
2.2 PRE -PLAT CONFERENCE
A pre -plat conference shall be held between the Subdivider and the City Planner to
discuss Zoning Code requirements, subdivision design requirements, platting procedures
and improvements construction.
2.3 PRELIMINARY PLAT
2.3.1 Purpose: The purpose of the Preliminary Plat is to provide an interim step in the
procedure when the Subdivider shall submit a proposed preliminary plat containing the
information required in paragraph 2.3.2 hereof. It is at this point that the items discussed
at the Pre -plat conference are shown and the development is examined to see if it
conforms to the Subdivision Regulations.
2.3.2 Preliminary Plat Contents: The Preliminary Plat shall be drawn at a scale of one
hundred (100) feet to one inch or larger. All printing shall be clear and legible. All sheets
shall be of a consistent size of twenty -four (24) inches by thirty six (36) inches or
smaller. Each sheet shall be sealed by a registered professional engineer. The Preliminary
Plat shall contain or be accompanied by the following information:
A. The Proposed name of the subdivision shall not duplicate or too closely resemble
names of existing subdivisions in Tulsa or Rogers Counties.
B. The names and addresses of the owner(s) of record, the subdivider(s), and the
registered engineer or land surveyor preparing the plat.
C. An accurate legal description of the property and a complete boundary survey
showing the dimensions, distances to the nearest one - hundredth foot, bearings to the
nearest second and acreage to the nearest one - hundredth acre.
D. The scale, north point and date.
E. The key or location map, at a legible scale, showing the locations of subdivisions
within the mile section.
F. The location of property lines of adjoining unplatted land and the names of adjoining
subdivisions and the location of city limits boundaries if adjoining the subdivision.
G. The topography with contour intervals of not more than two (2) feet based on United
States and Geodetic Survey data.
H. The location and description of all existing structures.
I. The locations of all ponds, lakes and streams and the areas subject to flooding based
upon the regulatory flood.
J. The location, width and name of each existing or proposed street or other public way,
railroad, and utility easement, bridge, park and other public open space within or adjacent
to the proposed subdivision.
K. The locations and widths of easements of all oil, gas and petroleum product pipelines
within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision.
5
L. The location of every existing or abandoned oil or gas well or dry hole drilled in
search of oil or gas as shown by the records of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission
and by such records as may be on file with the Planning Commission.
M. The location of facilities and land to be considered for dedication to public use, or to
be reserved for use of all property owners in the subdivision and any conditions of such
dedications or reservations.
N. All proposed lots consecutively numbered, their dimensions, and all building setback
lines.
O. All blocks consecutively numbered.
P. Any other information as may be deemed by the Planning Commission as reasonably
necessary for the full and proper consideration of the proposed subdivision.
Q. Draft of Restrictive Covenants.
R. List of abutting property owners.
2.3.3 Application: The Subdivider shall submit twenty -four (24) copies of the
Preliminary Plat to the City Planner no later than the first business day of the month of
the TAC meeting at which the plat will be reviewed. The Preliminary Plat shall be
accompanied by an application, the forms for which shall be supplied by the City
Planner, and a fee as established by resolution.
2.3.4 Review of Preliminary Plats:
A. The City Planner upon receipt of the preliminary plat and fees shall:
1. Distribute copies of the Preliminary Plat to the Technical Advisory Committee,
2. Set the plat on the TAC and Planning Commission agendas,
3. Review the plat for conformance with the Zoning code and these Regulations,
4. Prepare recommendations for submission to the TAC and Planning Commission.
5. Notify abutting property owners by First Class Mail.
B. The Technical Advisory Committee shall review the Preliminary Plat and make
recommendations to the Planning Commission.
C. The Planning Commission, at a public hearing, shall accept, accept with
modifications, or continue to a date certain the preliminary plat.
Such Planning Commission action will be conveyed to the subdivider in writing within
five (5) days after the meeting at which such plat was considered. The subdivider shall be
notified of the reasons for such action and what requirements will be necessary for the
final plat to meet the approval of the Commission.
The acceptance of the preliminary plat does not constitute an acceptance of the
subdivision, but is deemed to be an authorization to proceed with the preparation of the
final plat.
2.3.5 Preliminary Plat Expiration: The approval of a Preliminary Plat shall be effective
for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, at the
end of which time approval of the final plat must have been obtained from the City
Council. Unless the City Planner grants an extension in writing, any Preliminary Plat not
3
receiving final plat approval within one (1) year shall be null and void. Every plat shall
conform to existing Subdivision Regulations applicable at the time of approval of the
Preliminary Plat unless modifications have been granted.
2.4 FINAL PLAT
2.4.1 Application: The Subdivider shall submit twenty -nine (29) copies of the Final Plat
and Restrictive Covenants to the City Planner no later than the first business day of the
month of the TAC meeting at which the plat will be reviewed. The Final Plat shall be
accompanied by an application, the forms for which shall be supplied by the City
Planner, and a fee as established by ordinance. Requests for Exceptions to these
Regulations or requirements of the Preliminary Plat shall be submitted in accordance
with these Regulations.
2.4.2 Contents: The Final Plat shall show:
A. The name of the subdivision, city, county and state. The subdivision name shall not
duplicate or too closely approximate the name of any existing subdivision in Tulsa or
Rogers Counties.
B. The name and address of the owner(s) of record, the subdivider(s) and the registered
engineer or land surveyor preparing the plat. Official seals of the engineer or surveyor
are required.
C. The accurate legal description of the subdivision referenced to section, range and
township, based on an accurate traverse, giving angular and linear dimensions which
must mathematically close, the allowable error of closure on any portion of a final plat
shall be one (1) foot in five thousand (5,000).
D. The location of monuments shown in reference to existing United States Coastal and
Geodetic Survey data or the nearest established street lines, including true angles and
distances to such reference points or monuments.
E. The date of preparation of the plat, north arrow and scale (written and graphic
presentation).
F. The key or location map showing location and name of subdivisions within the mile
section.
G. The total acreage and total number of lots of the subdivision shown near the key or
location map.
H. The names of all adjacent subdivisions and the names, locations and widths of all
existing streets, easements, drainageways, and other public ways adjacent to the property.
I. Location of lots, streets, public highways, alleys, parks, building lines, limits of no
access and other features, with accurate dimensions in feet and decimals of feet and
distances, angles and/or bearings. Where these lines follow a curve, the central angle, the
radius, point of curvature, length of curve and length of intermediate tangents shall be
shown.
7
J. The blocks numbered consecutively throughout the entire subdivision and the lots
numbered consecutively throughout each block, with areas to be excluded from platting
marked "reserved" or "not for public use."
K. Locations and accurate dimensions of all property to be offered for dedication for
public use, and all property reserved for the common use of the property owners within
the subdivision, with purpose indicated. This includes, but is not limited to, dedication of
streets and alleys, parks, drainageways, or other areas dedicated or reserved for public
use.
L. The names of all streets to be dedicated.
M. The dimensions of all lots and lot lines, and the bearings of those lot lines not parallel
or perpendicular to the street right -of -way line.
N. Location and dimensions of all easements to be dedicated. All easements shall be
denoted by fine dashed lines, clearly identified, and if already on record, the recorded
reference of such easements. The width of an easement with sufficient ties to locate it
definitely with respect to the subdivision must be shown.
O. Easements located outside the boundaries of the plat, required for plat approval. Proof
of executed easements shall be provided to the city upon request of a permit to construct.
P. The deeds of dedication for all rights -of -way, easements and other properties and any
deed restrictions applicable to the subdivision shall be shown.
Q. The location of every oil or gas well, or abandoned oil or gas well, or dry hole drilled
in search of oil or gas, as certified by the records of the Oklahoma Corporation
Commission submitted to the Planning Commission.
R. All lots located in a one hundred (100) year flood plain area of special flood hazard
shall have the building pad elevation provided on each lot on a copy of the final plat prior
to recording the final plat. That pad elevation shall be a minimum of one (1) foot above
the said one hundred (100) year flood elevation as identified by Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) or other authority.
S. A copy of any private restrictions affecting the subdivision or any part thereof attached
to each plat.
T. Reference to any separate instruments which directly affect land being subdivided,
including restrictive covenants, filed in the office of the county recorder of deeds.
U. Any other information as may be deemed by the Planning Commission as reasonably
necessary for the full and proper consideration of the proposed subdivision.
2.4.3 Technical Advisory Committee Action: The Technical Advisory Committee shall
review the Final Plat to ensure that all requirements have been satisfied. If any required
items are not shown on the Final Plat, the TAC shall identify the requirements on a copy
of the Final Plat, which shall be retained by the City Planner.
2.4.4 Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission shall act upon the Final
Plat after it has been submitted for final approval unless the stipulation for additional
time is agreed to by the developer. If the final plat is disapproved, grounds for the refusal
shall be stated in writing, a copy of which shall be transmitted to the applicant.
2.4.5 City Council Action: The City Council shall act upon the Final Plat subdivision of
public land and for the acceptance of public ways, service and utility easements and land
dedicated to public use. Approval of the final plat shall in no way be construed as
acceptance of the public works improvements. The disapproval of any plat or plan by the
City Council shall be deemed a refusal of the proposed dedication shown thereon.
2.4.6 Drafting: The Final Plat prepared for recording purposes shall be drawn at a scale
of at least one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet or larger scale. The size of sheets
on which such Final Plats are submitted shall be a consistent size of twenty -four (24)
inches by thirty -six (36) inches or smaller. The drawing surface of any such plat shall
have a binding margin of two (2) inches at the left side of the plat and a margin not less
than one (1) inch at the right side. Where the proposed plat is of unusual size, the Final
Plat may be submitted on two or more sheets of the same dimensions. If more than two
sheets are required, an index sheet of the same dimensions shall be filed showing the
entire development.
2.4.7 Certifications: The following certifications shall be required on the Final Plat filed
of record in the office of the County Clerk:
A. Certification signed and acknowledged by all parties having any title interest in the
land subdivided, consenting to the preparation and recording of the plat as submitted. All
copies of the plat shall carry the original signatures of the owner or owners and notary
public.
B. Certification by the registered land surveyor or registered engineer as to the accuracy
of the survey and of the plat, and that the monuments and bench marks are accurate as to
location shown.
C. Certification by the Mayor and City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the approval of
the plat by the City Council.
2.4.8 Prints to be Furnished after Final Approval of the Plat:
A. A minimum of eleven (11) copies of the approved final plat shall be furnished for
endorsement by the appropriate city officials. Each copy shall bear the original signatures
of the owner or owners and be duly acknowledged.
B. After the approved Final Plat is filed of record in the office of the County Clerk, the
subdivider shall return to the City Planner eight (8) certified plats, all with the
appropriate stamps, signatures and plat number from the County Clerk's office. Unless
instructed otherwise by the City Planner, the Developer is required to also to the City
Planner.
C. After the final plat has been executed by all required officials, the City Planner shall
distribute copies to appropriate officials, agencies or departments and utility companies
and retain file copies in the offices of the City Clerk and City Planner.
2.4.9 Approval and Recording of Plats Required: No plat or other land subdivision
instrument shall be filed in the office of the County Clerk until it shall have been
approved by the City Council as required. A Final Plat shall be filed within six (6)
months of the approval of the City Council. Failure to record the plat within six (6)
months of the date of the City Council approval shall void all approvals thereto, unless a
written extension is granted by the City Planner.
E
2.5 FEES
Preliminary Plat application fee, Final Plat application fee, Lot Split Application fee
inspection fees and other pertinent fees shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule
as established by resolution by the City Council.
2.6 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
The platting of Planned Unit Developments shall proceed in accordance with Chapters
one and two of these Regulations upon approval of a PUD by the City Council in
accordance with the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
3.1 GENERAL
Subdivision design shall reflect the provisions of the Zoning Code, Owasso Engineering
Design Criteria, other city ordinances and these regulations to the end that each subdivision
will relate harmoniously with adjacent areas and the community in an orderly, safe, efficient
and attractive manner.
3.2 STREETS
3.2.1 Access:
A. Each lot of a subdivision shall be provided with access to a public street or
approved private street or highway to assure convenience of the lot owner as
well as to provide for the layout of utilities, waste removal, deliveries and
emergency services.
B. Lots shall not generally derive access from major streets. Provisions
restricting ingress and egress to streets may be required by the Planning
Commission and City Council to assure traffic safety and to relieve
congestion at intersections.
C. Double frontage lots and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided except
where necessary to provide separation of residential development from
traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography or
orientation.
3.2.2 Abutting Arterial Streets: Where a subdivision abuts or contains an existing or
proposed arterial street, the Planning Commission may require service streets,
reverse frontage with screen planting contained in a non - access reservation along the
rear property line, deep lots or such other treatment as may be necessary for
adequate protection of residential properties and to afford separation of through and
local traffic.
3.2.3 Abutting Railroad or Highway Right -of -Way: Where a subdivision abuts or
contains a railroad right -of -way or limited access highway right -of -way, the
10
Planning Commission and City Council may require a street approximately parallel
to and on each side of such right -of -way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use
of the intervening land. Such distances shall also be determined with regard for the
requirements of approach grades and grade separation.
3.2.4 Through Traffic: Minor streets shall be arranged so that their use by through traffic
will be discouraged. Industrial and commercial streets shall not inject
non - residential traffic into residential areas. The arrangement of streets within a
subdivision shall, except for cul -de -sacs, connect with streets already dedicated in
adjoining subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unplatted
tracts.
3.2.5 Adjacent Properties: Where adjoining properties are not subdivided, the
arrangement of streets shall be projected to the boundary of the proposed subdivision
with provisions made for a temporary right -of -way for a turn around of a size
acceptable to the City Engineer. Barricades shall be installed at dead -end streets.
Alignments, grades, drainage, and other appropriate design criteria of all streets
within and bordering new subdivisions shall be governed by these regulations,
where applicable, and by the Design Criteria of the City.
3.2.6 Reserve Strips: Reserve strips controlling access to streets shall be prohibited except
where approved by the Planning Commission and City Council.
3.2.7 Future Development: Where a tract to be subdivided includes only a portion of the
tract owned or intended for development by the subdivider, a tentative plan of a
proposed future street system for the unsubdivided remainder of the property shall
be prepared and submitted by the subdivider.
3.2.8 Private Streets: Private streets shall not be approved, except when required by state
law, or in connection with a Planned Unit Development having appropriate controls.
3.2.9 Street Offsets: Street offsets with center -line offsets of less than one hundred fifty
(150) feet shall not be allowed.
3.2.10 Dedication of Right -of Way: Whenever an arterial is located adjacent to the outer
edge of a subdivision, one -half (1 /z) of the right -of -way necessary to widen the
arterial to five lanes shall be dedicated, if it is determined by the Planning
Commission and City Council that such dedication is equitable and feasible for the
other half of the right -of -way from the adjacent property. Half -street dedications on
minor streets are prohibited.
3.2.11 Cul -de -sac Streets: All dead -end streets having a length of more than one hundred
fifty (150) feet shall terminate in a cul -de -sac which has a circular turn- around
having a minimum right -of -way radius of fifty (50) feet and a pavement radius of
forty (40) feet. No such cul -de -sac street shall be more than six hundred (600) two
11
thousand five hundred (2,500) feet in length measured from the entrance to the
center of the turn- around.
3.2.12 Collector Streets: Collectors streets shall be so located as to provide for smooth
traffic flow from local streets to arterials. Collector streets should normally be
continuous for distances of not more than one half (1 /z) mile, and offsets which are
likely to induce continuing of traffic flow beyond that distance shall be avoided.
3.2.13 Street Names and Numbers:
A. No street names shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the
names of existing streets. All north and south thoroughfares shall be
designated "Avenues ", all east and west thoroughfares shall be designated
"Streets ", and numbering of streets shall be according to the Tulsa County
system. Where a street is an extension of an existing street, the existing
name shall be used. Where a new street is not an extension of an existing
street, new names or numbers may be used subject to the approval of the
Planning Commission and City Council.
B. Lot address numbers shall be established and shown on an address plat by
the subdivider. The City Planner shall review the address plat and inform
the subdivider of any corrections of the address ranges. The subdivider shall
make the corrections, if any, and shall submit with final plat three (3) copies
of the final address plat. The City Planner shall be responsible for the
coordination of addressing lots and changing the addresses of lots.
3.2.14 Intersections: Streets shall be designed to intersect at right angles or as near to
right -angles as possible. Within subdivisions, three -way intersections are preferable
to four -way intersections. Right -of -way corners at minor street intersections shall
have a minimum radius of twenty -five (25) feet. Right -of -way corners involving a
major street or highway shall have a minimum radius of forty (40) feet.
3.2.15 Street Layout:
A. Local roads shall be curved whenever possible to avoid uniformity of lot
appearance. All streets shall be arranged so as to obtain as many as possible
of the building sites at, or above, the grades of the streets. Unless by reason
of topographical uniqueness or hardship, a variance is approved by the
Owasso Board of Adjustment, all building sites shall be situated above the
grades of the streets. Grades of streets shall conform as closely as possible
to the original topography. A combination of steep grades and curves shall
be avoided. Specific standards are contained in the Owasso Engineering
Design Criteria.
B. All streets shall be properly integrated with the existing and proposed system
of thoroughfares and dedicated right -of -way as already established.
12
C. Minor or local streets shall be laid out to conform as much as possible to the
topography, to discourage use by through traffic, to permit efficient drainage
and utility systems and to require the minimum number of streets necessary
to provide convenient and safe access to property.
D. The rigid rectangular grid street pattern should be avoided and the use of
curvilinear streets, cul -de -sacs, or U- shaped streets shall be encouraged
where such use will result in a more desirable layout.
E. Unless maintained by a homeowners organization, islands in streets shall be
avoided.
3.2.16 Right -of -Way Widths: Minimum right -of -way of all proposed streets shall be of the
width specified in the Owasso Major Street and Highway Plan, or if no width is
specified therein, the minimum width shall be as follows:
Type of Street Minimum Right -of -way Width
Highway As required by the standards of the Oklahoma
Department of Transportation
Arterial 100 feet *
Commercial or Industrial
Collector 80 feet
Residential Collector 60 feet **
Residential 50 feet
Frontage or Service 40 feet
Commercial Alley 30 feet
Residential Alley 20 feet
Cul -de -sac Radius 50 feet
* Arterial Streets shall show an additional twenty -six (26) feet of right -of-
way width for one hundred (100) feet in each direction from Arterial Street
intersections to allow for right turn lanes.
** Collector Streets shall show an additional thirteen (13) feet of right -of-
way width for one hundred (100) feet in each direction from Arterial Street
intersections to allow for a center turn lane.
13
3.2.17 Paving Width: The minimum paving width for all streets shall conform to the
Owasso Design Criteria.
3.2.18 Grades: The grades of streets shall conform to the requirements of the Owasso
Design Criteria.
3.2.19 Street Alignments: The horizontal and vertical alignments of streets shall conform
to the requirements of the Owasso Design Criteria.
3.3 ALLEYS
3.3.1 Commercial and Industrial Districts: Alleys may be required by the Planning
Commission and City Council in commercial and industrial zoned districts to
provide service access, off -street loading and unloading, parking and access for
police and fire fighting services. Such alleys shall be not less than thirty (30) feet in
width of right -of -way.
3.3.2 Residential: Alleys are not required for residential zoned properties, but when
provided shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in width of right -of -way.
3.3.3 Alignment: Horizontal changes in alignment shall be gradual and at intersection
corners shall have a radius of twenty (20) feet to permit safe vehicular turning
movements.
3.3.4 Dead -end Alleys: Dead end alleys shall be avoided where possible, but where
unavoidable, shall be provided with an adequate vehicle turnaround at the terminus
as determined by the City Engineer.
3.3.5 Obstructions: No obstructions shall be permitted in areas reserved for alleys.
3.4 SIDEWALKS
Sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of all streets in all zoning categories
except industrial. The design and location shall be in accordance with the Owasso Design
Criteria. Subdivisions shall include sidewalks located in such a manner that pedestrian
access is provided to adjacent land. Subdivisions in RE Residential and AG Agricultural
zoning districts are not required to have sidewalks if the development contains a pedestrian
trail in a common area or reserve area connecting the development with adjacent properties.
3.5 EASEMENTS
3.5.1 General: In the dedication of easements and rights -of -way, the developer shall
stipulate that no building, structure, or other above or below ground obstruction shall
be placed, constructed, installed or permitted on such easement or rights -of -way
shown in such a manner that will interfere with the installation, operation,
maintenance, repairing, removing, or replacing of utilities.
14
3.5.2 Width: Easements shall be of a minimum width of twenty -two (22) feet, eleven (11)
feet on each rear lot line and along each side lot line, and seventeen and one -half
(17.5) feet on the subdivision perimeter, or of a width as specified by the Technical
Advisory Committee and City Engineer for poles, wires, conduits, drainage, sanitary
sewer, gas, water, power, cable television and other utility lines.
3.5.3 Continuity: Utility easements shall connect with easements established in adjoining
properties. These easements, when approved, shall not thereafter be changed
without the approval of the City Council, by ordinance, after review and
recommendation by the City Engineer.
3.5.4 Drainage Easements: Drainage easements for storm sewers are required. Open
channels shall not be the primary drainage mechanism. These easements may be
along the side lot lines, but usually the design should be such that the drainage will
be carried in the street right of way. Additional right -of -way width may be required.
All drainage easements shall be of a size to allow equipment access for construction
and maintenance of the facility.
3.6 PUBLIC AREAS AND OPEN SPACES
Public parks, playgrounds, school sites and other public areas and open spaces shall
be provided in accordance with the requirements and standards set forth in the
comprehensive plan and in the ordinances relating thereto.
3.6 LOTS
3.6.1 Access: Every lot shall abut a street dedicated to the public or a private street of an
approved Planned Unit Development or other approved access (See Section 4.2.1
A.).
3.6.2 Double Frontage: Subdivisions should be designed so that lots do not front on two
parallel streets except where a row of lots is designed to separate residential
development from through traffic or overcome specific disadvantages of terrain and
orientation (See Section 4.2.1 Q.
3.6.3 Zoning Code Requirements: Lot dimensions, yard sizes, building setback line
dimensions, and lot areas shall conform to the minimum requirements of the Zoning
Code.
3.6.4 Corner Lots: Lots at the intersections of streets should exceed minimum Zoning
Code area requirements to provide adequate building areas and required building
setbacks from intersecting streets.
3.6.5 Lot Depth: Excessive lot depth in relation to lot width is prohibited. The maximum
lot depth shall not be greater than the quotient of the lot width divided by 0.45
(45 %). In other words, the maximum lot depth = lot width / 0.45.
15
3.6.6 Lot Lines: Side lot lines should be approximately at right angles to straight street
lines or radial to curved street lines.
3.6.7 Parking and Loading: Commercial and Industrial lots should be of an appropriate
size and shape to provide for adequate off - street parking and loading facilities.
3.7 BLOCKS
The length, width and shape of blocks shall be suited for the planned use of land, consistent
with Zoning Code requirements and the need for convenient access, control and safety of
street traffic and the limitations of terrain.
Width: Blocks for residential use shall have sufficient width to provide for two (2) tiers of
lots of appropriate depth, except on the boundaries of a proposed subdivision or where it is
important to separate residential development from other types of development or through
traffic. Blocks intended for commercial, office or industrial uses should be of a width
suitable for the intended use, with due allowance for off - street parking and loading facilities.
Blocks for such uses should normally not exceed six hundred (600) feet in length.
3.8 BUILDING LINES AND ELEVATIONS
3.8.1 Zoning Code requirements: Building lines shall be provided for all subdivision plats
in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code district in which the
subdivision is located unless varied by the Board of Adjustment or superseded as
specified by the Planned United Development text.
3.8.2 Zero Lot Lines: In areas of the subdivision where zero lot lines are permitted,
appropriate provisions in plats and restrictive covenants may be permitted.
3.8.3 Restrictions on Plat: Restrictions requiring buildings to be located within the
building lines shown on the plat shall be set forth on the plat or on a separate
recorded instrument.
3.8.4 Pad Elevations: Minimum building pad elevations shall be shown on each lot
included in the final plat.
3.9 FLOOD PLAIN AREAS
Prohibitions and Exceptions: Areas identified by the official flood plain maps of the City of
Owasso which are subject to flooding hazards and periodic inundations, shall not be
subdivided into lots, tracts or parcels for any use which would be incompatible with such
flooding hazards unless:
A. Improvements meeting the standards and requirements of the City Engineer
are designed to render such land safe for residential or other uses, or
16
B. The intended use of the land is permitted by city ordinances or permitted by
Variance or Special Exception as outlined by city ordinance.
3.10 OIL AND GAS WELLS
3.10.1 Setback from Producing Wells: Where there is found to be a producing oil or gas
well which is within the boundaries of a proposed subdivision, there shall be a
building setback line so placed on the plat to prevent the erection construction of a
building within one hundred fifty (150) feet of such well.
3.10.2 Setback from or Plugging of Abandoned Wells: Where there is found to be an
abandoned oil or gas well which is not adequately plugged according to the
standards established by the state law and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission,
which well is within the boundaries of a proposed subdivision, said well shall be
adequately plugged according to said standards and so certified by the Oklahoma
Corporation Commission before the plat of such addition is given final approval. In
lieu of plugging such wells, a building setback line shall be so placed on the plat to
prevent the construction of a building within one hundred fifty (150) feet of such
well. In any event, a certificate or clearance shall be obtained from the Oklahoma
Corporation Commission as to the existence of any wells reflected in their records.
3.10.3 Access: Access shall be provided and so indicated on the face of the plat for all
unplugged wells for the purpose of maintenance and rework.
3.11 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
The development of hillside areas or any area with a slope of greater than eight
percent (8 %) shall be designed to minimize grading and filling and retain natural ground
cover. Areas with slope in excess of twenty percent (20 %) shall be utilized as open space or
developed in accordance with a Planned Unit Development as defined by the Zoning Code.
3.12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
When a subdivision is developed as a Planned Unit Development in accordance with
applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission and City Council may
vary the requirements of these regulations in order to allow the subdivider more freedom in
the arrangement of the subdivision but at the same time protect the convenience, health,
safety, and welfare of the probable future residents of the subdivision as well as the
character of the surrounding property and the general welfare of the entire community.
3.13 STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND DETENTION
Every subdivision shall be provided with a storm water drainage system adequate to
serve the area being platted. Such storm water drainage system shall be designed so that
property located downstream from and upstream from the subdivision shall not be
injuriously affected by the construction, operation, or maintenance of such system. Storm
17
water detention and drainage systems shall be designed according to the Owasso Design
Criteria. The covenants of each subdivision shall require that the subdivision's homeowners
association be responsible for the maintenance of the overland lot -to -lot stormwater
drainage and detention facilities.
3.14 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS
For every residential subdivision platted and developed in Owasso after the passage
of these regulations, a homeowners association shall be created. Enforcement of the
subdivision's covenants, and ownership and control over the subdivision's common areas
shall be transferred to the homeowners association by the time that 85% of the lots within
the subdivision have received building permits.
CHAPTER 4. SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES
4.1 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ESTABLISHED STANDARDS
All improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Owasso Design
Criteria established by the City Engineer and approved by the City Council. The City
Engineer may establish special standards in excess of the Owasso Design Criteria which
are generally applicable to safely accommodate unusual circumstances or the heavy
commercial and industrial use of streets, utilities, water, sewer and other public
improvements.
4.2 IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED
4.2.1 Street Improvements: The subdivider shall design, grade, oversee, test and
otherwise improve all streets which are designated on the approved plat or which directly
serve the subdivision in accordance with the Owasso Design Criteria as directed by the
City Engineer.
4.2.2 Street Traffic Control Devices, Signs and Names: The subdivider shall provide at
his expense, and install, all traffic control devices and signs required by the City prior to
acceptance of the street by the City Council. Street name signs are to be furnished and
installed by the subdivider at all intersections within or abutting the subdivision, the type
of which shall be in accordance with the specifications of the Owasso Design Criteria
and locations approved by the Director of Public Works. Street names shall be approved
by the Planning Commission and City Council.
4.2.3 Fire Hydrant Reflector Turtles: The subdivider shall provide at his expense, and
install, blue reflective turtles identifying all fire hydrants. Said reflectors shall be located
in the center of all residential streets wherever a fire hydrant is located.
4.2.4 Street Lights: The subdivider shall provide adequate street lighting in the
subdivision to the specifications of the Owasso Design Criteria.
l'3
4.2.5 Monuments and Markers: The location of all permanent markers shall be shown on
the face of the Final Plat. Permanent reference markers shall be placed according to the
specifications of the Owasso Design Criteria.
4.2.6 Public Water Supply: Where an approved public water supply is reasonably
accessible, the subdivider shall install water lines and fire hydrants to connect with such
water supply and make it available for each lot within the subdivided area. The Final Plat
shall not receive City Council approval until it is certified by the Health Department that
there has been compliance with the regulations of the Oklahoma State Department of
Health and where indicated, meets other jurisdictional governing bodies' requirements.
4.2.7 Stormwater Drainage and Detention Facilities:
The subdivider shall provide a stormwater drainage system that is designed and
constructed in accordance with the Owasso Design Criteria.
4.2.8 Rural Roadside Drainage Standards:
A. Definition:
Roadside ditches are engineered channels constructed along the sides of the roadway and
located either wholly or partly within the street right -of -way. The purpose of these ditches
is to collect storm water runoff from the roadway and adjacent tributary areas and convey
the accumulated runoff to acceptable outlet points.
B. Permitted Uses:
Unless provided for by special exemption by the City Engineer, roadside ditches are
permissible only in subdivisions within RE residential and AG agricultural zoning
districts. Maintenance of roadside ditches shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners
Association of the subdivision, and shall be included within the covenants of the
subdivision.
C. Easements:
Roadside ditches located within the street right -of -way do not require a drainage
easement. Roadside ditches located otherwise shall have a dedicated drainage easement
extending from the street right -of -way to two feet outside of the top of the outside bank
(backslope) of the channel.
19
D. Design Procedures:
Design of roadside ditches should be based on a clear understanding of the generally
recognized principles of open channel flow. Unless otherwise noted or excepted, the
design of roadside ditches shall conform with the previous requirements of 0509 "Open
Channels." The Engineer may require additional analysis or documentation before
approving atypical or non - conforming designs.
E. Design Goals:
Roadside ditches shall:
Accommodate the design runoff in a mariner which assures the safety of motorists.
Provide sufficient conveyance to prevent damage to adjacent properties.
Drain subsurface water from the base of the roadway to prevent saturation and loss of
support for the pavement.
Minimize long -term maintenance requirements by including design features that minimize
deterioration from velocity- induced scour, sediment deposition at low velocity and
ponding at runoff.
Mitigate erosion and other adverse environmental or aesthetic effects.
F. Design Storm:
Engineered channels shall be designed to completely contain the 1 % return frequency
(100 -year) storm within the boundaries of the drainage easement. Channels shall be stable,
free from erosion damage and shall allow free drainage of the roadway base material
during the 10% return frequency (10 -year) storm.
G. Design Capacity:
The hydraulic capacity of the ditch should be such as to insure that the high water
elevation at the 10 -year (10% return frequency) design flow will be below the bottom of
the roadway base course.
A pipe conveyance system shall be required when the design discharge exceeds the ditch
capacity.
WC
H. Flow Velocity:
The maximum velocity for the 100 -year flood peak flow shall not exceed 5.0 feet per
second for Type I ditches and 6.0 feet per second for Type II and Type III ditches. Type I
and Type II ditches shall be designed with a maximum Froude Number of 0.8. Type III
ditches shall be designed with a maximum Froude Number of 0.9. No grass lined or
composite ditch or channel having a Froude Number of 1.0 or greater along any portion of
its alignment will be approved.
Minimum velocity in a channel having a Manning's roughness coefficient less than or
equal to 0.015 shall be 2.5 feet per second to avoid excessive sedimentation.
I. Typical Section:
The shape of a roadside channel section should minimize vehicular impact and provide a
traversable section for errant vehicles leaving the traveled way. The ideal channel section,
from a safety standpoint, will have flattened side slopes and a curved, parabolic transition
to the channel bottom.
Ditch foreslopes for grass -lined ditches shall be designed with grades not to exceed 4
horizontal to 1 vertical. Ditch backslopes should be designed with the same grade; but
may be approved up to 3 horizontal to 1 vertical depending on right -of -way or drainage
easement constraints. For maintenance purposes, no grass -lined channel steeper than 3:1
will be approved.
Channel slopes shall not exceed the angle of repose of the soil and/or lining. Side slopes
for channel linings other than grass will be approved based on the physical and hydraulic
properties of the material. No roadside channel having a sideslope steeper than 2.5
horizontal to 1 vertical will be approved, regardless of the lining material
J. Horizontal Alignment/Alignment Changes:
Channel alignment changes shall be achieved by curves having a minimum radius of:
R=V 2 *W/81) where:
R = Minimum radius on centerline in feet
V = Design velocity (10 -year) of flow in feet per second
W = Width of charnel at water surface in feet
D = Depth of flow in feet
21
or three (3) times the maximum top width at the design flow (10 -year) depth, whichever is
larger.
The Engineer may require additional analysis at bends to determine the possible need for
additional freeboard or protection from velocity induced erosion.
K. Vertical Alignment/Longitudinal Slope:
In many cases, the grade of the side ditch will follow the profile grade of the roadway.
These template ditches are generally constrained not only in profile grade, but also in
alignment and cross section by the geometric and safety standards applicable to the
project. In addition, maximum and minimum allowable velocities will define the upper
and lower bounds of the longitudinal slope.
For special ditches whose slope differs from that of the profile grade, the Engineer may
require a minimum slope of 0.2% to prevent ponding. Drop structures or ditch checks may
be required to limit velocity where slopes exceed 2.5 %. Steeper longitudinal slopes may
be allowed when the ditch is flowing partially full.
Vertical profiles for roadside ditches shall be shown on the roadway drawings. Grades of
special ditches shall be indicated adjacent to their profile. Velocities for the 10 -year and
100 -year design events shall be included in the design data. Hydraulic and Energy
Gradelines shall be included in the design data.
L. Freeboard:
Freeboard is not required for roadside ditches that conform to the design capacity and
section described in 0509.2 E and shown in the standard drawings. Additional freeboard
may be required at the outside of horizontal bends based on velocity and superelevation
considerations.
The designer shall exercise care that the 100 -year (I% return frequency) design flow will
be no less than 2.0 feet below the finished floor of any adjacent dwelling or structure.
M. Roughness Coefficient:
The roughness coefficient, "n", for use in Manning's equation for open channel flow, shall
be based on the channel characteristics of each particular design. The table shown in
0509.1 C serves as a reference of possible values. Other values for specific characteristics
may be considered if derived from reliable references. Manning's "n" for composite
channels must reflect the relative surface area of the different materials.
22
N. Invert:
Ditch invert protection shall be used when design velocities exceed 5 feet per second.
Ditch invert protection will be used at the upstream and downstream ends of all culverts.
O. Lining:
Linings for roadside ditches may be classified as either flexible or rigid. The difference
between flexible and rigid channel linings is their response to changing channel shape.
Flexible linings are able to conform to changes in the channel shape while rigid linings
will not. Where flexible linings are capable of withstanding design velocities, they are
preferred over rigid linings. Flexible linings are constructed of the following materials:
i. Sod or seeded grasses
ii. Erosion control blankets
iii. Turf reinforcement blankets
iv. Machined rip -rap
V. Wire- enclosed rock (gabions or mattresses)
Rigid linings may consist of either cast -in -place concrete or grouted rip -rap. The use of
rigid linings for roadside ditches is discouraged.
P. Erosion Control:
The designer shall verify that both temporary and permanent vegetative linings are suited
to the hydraulic conditions of the channel for which they are specified and are capable of
resisting erosion until they are permanently established. Sod should be placed parallel to
the direction of flow and should be secured in place with pins or staples. Seeded grasses
should incorporate erosion control blankets to insure soil stability until permanent
vegetation is established. Ditches subject to highly erosive flows may require the use of
permanent turf reinforcement mats.
The temporary erosion control plan during construction shall be sufficient to prevent
sedimentation of drainageways, drainage structures and flood plain areas that could result
in reduced flow capacity, excessive bank erosion, erosion around structures or damage to
adjoining property.
The permanent erosion control plan shall be sufficient to:
23
• Permanently stabilize all disturbed areas with permanent vegetation, including slopes
and embankments.
• Prevent erosion from exit velocities at outlets of culverts
• Prevent gullying and scouring of roadside ditches and open channels from excessive
shear stress through vegetation, linings, retention blankets, drop structures, etc. both
during and after the vegetation establishment period.
• Protect the integrity of all structural improvements and prevent excessive continuing
sedimentation from unstable right -of -way areas into drainage structures, channels and
roadway ditches.
Reference 0604.7 "Vegetative Best Management Practices" for additional information and
criteria.
Q. DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS
Minimum Size:
Driveway culverts shall be sized to pass the 10 -year (10% return frequency) ditch flow
capacity without overtopping the driveway. The minimum size for driveway culverts shall
be 18 inches in diameter for round pipe or an equivalent cross - sectional area for arch or
elliptical shapes. Culverts shall be designed using inlet control.
Construction Material:
Construction materials listed in 0510.2 A are acceptable for driveway culvert construction.
In addition, corrugated metal pipe (CGMP) conforming to ODOT Standard Specifications
for Highway Construction (1999 or latest edition) Section 726.02 (b) 1 and 2 shall be
acceptable. Driveway culverts constructed of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe are
acceptable only if the driveway is constructed of concrete of no less than 6 inches thickness.
Minimum Cover:
Driveway culverts shall be provided with the minimum cover recommended by the pipe
structural design requirements or 1 foot, whichever is greater.
Minimum Slope:
A minimum slope shall be provided to maintain a minimum velocity of 2.5 feet per second
through the culvert for the design flow.
Culvert End Treatments:
All driveway culverts shall be provided with end treatments on the upstream and
downstream ends of the culvert to protect and maintain the integrity of the culvert opening.
ODOT Standard Sloped Concrete End Treatments conforming to ODOT Standard Drawing
R -80 (AE -DE) are acceptable. Other end sections must be submitted to the Engineer for
approval.
Design and Construction of Driveway Culverts:
24
Additional information must be included in the drainage report and on the construction
drawings for new subdivisions where the use of roadside ditches and driveway culverts is
proposed. Driveway culverts shall be sized for each lot in the subdivision based on the
tributary area at the downstream lot line. The construction drawings shall include
information regarding sizes, materials, locations, lengths, grades and end treatments for all
driveway culverts. Typical driveway crossing/culvert details shall be included in the
drawings.
Maintenance:
Maintenance responsibilities for driveway culverts shall be included and explained in the
subdivision covenants.
4.2.9 Sanitary Sewer System:
A. Unless an exemption is granted in writing by the City Engineer, all lots platted within
the Owasso city limits shall be provided with a connection to sanitary sewer. All
connections shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and be in accordance
with the regulations of the Oklahoma State Department of Health.
B. Where a public sanitary sewer system is not reasonably accessible but where plans for
the installation of private sanitary sewers in the vicinity of the subdivision have been
prepared and approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health, the subdivider
shall install sewers in conformity with such plans.
4.2. 10 Utilities: All utilities shall be installed within easements specified on the
subdivision plat.
4.3 CONSTRUCTION PLANS
The Subdivider shall submit six (6) sets (one marked set of which will be returned to the
applicant) each of the Construction Plans for streets, drainage and detention, sanitary
sewer and water systems, including off -site systems and erosion control. The
Construction Plans shall show basic horizontal configurations, connections to existing
utilities, sizes and locations of proposed lines, proposed street widths and horizontal
curves, locations of storm sewers and detention facilities.
Six (6) sets of prints of the proposed plans and specifications for all improvements
required by these regulations shall be prepared by a qualified registered engineer and
filed with the City Engineer.
4.4 CITY ENGINEER REVIEW
Upon completing his review, the City Engineer shall submit his comments to the
Subdivider. All comments suggesting revision shall be accompanied by a reference to
appropriate sections of the Subdivision Regulations or Design Criteria. The City
Engineer's comments shall be delivered to the Subdivider. The return to the Subdivider
of the construction plans by the City Engineer, along with the City Engineer's comments,
if any, shall constitute a permit for the construction of public improvements; provided,
25
however, that construction prior to approval of the construction plans by the City
Engineer and the Department of Environmental Quality shall be at the Subdivider's sole
risk and the City shall not be liable for damage sustained by reason of the Subdivider's
construction.
4.5 SUBMISSION AND APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS BY CITY
ENGINEER
Submission of construction plans to the City Engineer shall constitute an
acknowledgment by the Subdivider that any construction undertaken prior to approval of
said plans by the Department of Environmental Quality and the City Engineer shall
solely be at the Subdivider's risk and that the City shall not be liable for damages
sustained by reason of construction having taken place before approval of the plans by
the State and the City Engineer.
4.6 SUBMISSION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Prior to City Council approval of the final plat, the developer shall furnish four (4) copies
of all water and sewer plans for submittal to the Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality for approval, along with the Application for Permit to Construct the facilities, the
Engineer's Report and the appropriate application fee for the Health Department review.
4.7 PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
The subdivider shall be required to participate in a pre - construction meeting with the
appropriate city staff.
4.8 CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FACILITIES
Following the approval of the Construction Plans, the subdivider shall complete in a
manner satisfactory with the City Engineer all required improvements and said
improvements shall be free and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances.
4.9 INSPECTIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of the required improvements for
defects. Upon completion of the improvements, the City Engineer shall file with the City
Council a statement either certifying that the improvements have been completed in
accordance with the Owasso Design Criteria or that the improvements are defective,
listing the defects.
4.10 AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS
Upon completion of the improvements, the subdivider and his engineer shall file with the
City Engineer one (1) mylar set and four (4) print sets of As -Built Construction Plans
certified and signed by a registered engineer for said improvements. The Developer is
encouraged to submit Computer -Aided Design (CAD) files of the As -Built Plans. These
0W
As -Built plans need to be submitted to the City Engineer within ninety (90) days of
acceptance of all improvements by the City Council.
The As -Built Construction Plans shall certify:
A. That all required improvements are complete,
B. That the subdivision improvements are in compliance with these regulations and the
Owasso Design Criteria,
C. That the subdivider knows of no defects in the improvements, and
D. That the subdivision improvements are free and clear of any encumbrance or lien.
4.11 ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS
The Owasso City Council shall formally accept, by resolution or ordinance, any or all
improvements before such improvements become public property, provided that all
statements and agreements specified above have been received and that As -Built
construction plans have been submitted. The maintenance bond shall begin with the
approval by the City Council and the approval of the As -Built plans shall not be
construed to mean that the maintenance bond is void. No building construction shall be
permitted on any lot to, or on which, improvements have not been completed in
accordance with the provisions of these regulations and no municipal utility service will
be furnished to such lot.
4.12 MAINTENANCE BOND
Prior to acceptance of those improvements by the City Council, the subdivider shall
obtain a maintenance Surety for the maintenance of said improvements as provided
herein. The Surety shall be in the form of a maintenance bond from a surety bonding
company authorized to do business in the State of Oklahoma or an irrevocable letter of
credit from a financial institution regulated by the State banking Department or the
united States Treasury Department. The Surety shall be filed with the City Clerk and
shall be payable to the City of Owasso. The amount of the Surety shall be equal to one
hundred percent (100 %) of the entire cost of materials for all water lines, sewer lines,
paving, and storm sewer improvements which the City shall accept for maintenance. The
duration of the maintenance Surety for streets shall be two (2) years from the date of
acceptance of said street improvements by the City Council. The duration of the
maintenance Surety for all other improvements shall be one (1) year from the date of
acceptance of said improvements by the City Council.
CHAPTER 5. FEES
5.1 AREA PARK, RECREATIONAL, AND CULTURAL REQUIREMENTS
All residential subdivision plats having a dwelling unit density of greater than one unit
per acre shall dedicate, according to the requirements hereinafter specified, a fee to be
utilized by the residents of the subdivision and the City of Owasso.
27
5. 1.1 Recreation Development Fee: In order to provide for area parks, cultural, and
recreation needs for newly developing areas of Owasso, a Recreation Development Fee
shall be assessed on each lot or multi - family unit created by subdivision, resubdivision or
lot split. The Recreation Development Fee shall be assessed before the approval of the
final plat by the City Council and shall be considered a condition for plat approval.
5.1.2 Definitions: For the purposes of this section, the following definitions are
established:
A. Residential Dwelling Unit: Any room or group of rooms located within a dwelling
and forming a single habitable unit with facilities that are used or intended to be used for
living, sleeping, and cooking by one or more individuals living together.
B. Bedroom: Any room within a residential dwelling unit which is designed to be used
for sleeping purposes and containing a closet of sufficient size to hold clothing. One
living room with entry closet shall not be considered a Bedroom in each residential
dwelling unit other than a studio or efficiency apartment.
C. Person: Any domestic or foreign corporation, firm, association, syndicate, joint stock
company, partnership of any kind, joint venture club, society or individual.
D. Mobile Home: A vehicle other than a motor vehicle, designed or used for residential
purposes, for carrying persons and property on its own structure, and for being drawn by
a motor vehicle.
E. Mobile Home Lot: Any area or portion of a Mobile Home Park designated, designed
or used for the occupancy of one mobile home or a temporary, semi - permanent or
permanent basis.
F. Mobile Home Park: Any area or tract of land established under the Mobile Home Park
District of the Owasso Zoning Ordinance.
5.1.3 Fee Structure
A. Fee Imposed: A $300 (or a sum approved by the City of Owasso after the adoption of
these regulations) recreation development fee is hereby imposed on the privilege of
constructing any residential dwelling unit or mobile home lot in the City of Owasso and
every person to whom a permit to construct a residential dwelling unit is issued, shall pay
to the City of Owasso such fee.
5.1.4 Park and Recreational Capital Fund
A. All fees collected under this Ordinance shall be placed in the Parks and Recreation
Capital Fund.
B. Use of Funds
1. All Parks Development fees collected under this Ordinance shall be used and
expended for the acquisition, purchase, developing, improving and equipping public
parks, playgrounds, cultural and recreational facilities located in the corporate limits of
the City of Owasso and shall never be used for operating public park facilities, or any
other purpose.
2. All Parks Development fees collected under this Ordinance shall also be used for the
development of any of the above described facilities constructed or installed within or
upon public property owned by the City of Owasso or property in which the City has a
leasehold interest or where the City is given a right to use the same for public playground
or recreational purposes. All such funds shall be spent in areas reasonably close to where
they are collected.
C. Purchase of Land: At such time as the Council, based upon the recommendations of
the Planning Commission, determines that there are sufficient funds achieved from a
certain area in the Park and Recreation Capital Fund for the acquisition, purchase,
developing, improving and equipping public parks, playgrounds, cultural and
recreational facilities located in the corporate limits of the City of Owasso, the Council
shall cause negotiations to be undertaken to purchase the site by mutual agreement or by
condemnation proceedings. The principal and interest deposited and kept in the Park
Capital Fund shall be used solely for the purposes of purchasing land for area parks,
recreation and cultural uses.
5.1.5 Place of Payment: The residential development fee shall be paid at the time of
purchase of the building permit in the office of the Building Inspection Department of
the City of Owasso.
5.1.6 Refund of Fees: Any fee paid to the City under this Ordinance for any residential
dwelling unit which is not constructed shall be refunded upon application of the applicant
and a showing to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector that the building or unit has
not been constructed or construction commenced and that the building permit issued for
the building or unit has been canceled or surrendered or otherwise does not authorize the
construction of the building or unit.
5.1.7 Exemptions: The fee imposed under this Article shall not apply to the following:
A. Construction or reconstruction of a residential dwelling unit which was damaged or
destroyed by fire, flood, or other cause over which the owner had no control (provided
that compliance with any building code or other ordinance requirement of the City of
Owasso or of any other applicable law shall not be deemed a cause over which the owner
has no control), but only if the number of bedrooms in the dwelling unit is increased,then
the fee imposed under this ordinance shall apply to such increased number of bedrooms.
B. Enlargement, expansion, remodeling and/or alteration of a residential dwelling unit
but only if the number of bedrooms therein is not increased. If the number of bedrooms
in the dwelling unit is increased, then the fee imposed under this ordinance shall apply to
such increased number of bedrooms.
5.1.8 Provision for the Dedication of Lands in Lieu of Fees: The City Council, at its sole
option, may accept the dedication or reservation of suitable sites for area parks,
playgrounds, cultural facility or other public recreational area providing that the land to
be dedicated is located within an area designated by the Comprehensive Plan, as having a
significant need for an area park.
A. Land accepted for dedication under the requirements of these regulations shall be
conveyed by either of the following methods:
1. By dedication within the plat to be filed for record in the office of the County Clerk.
2. By Warranty Deed transferring the property in fee simple to the City of Owasso.
29
In any event, land must be free and clear of any mortgages or liens at the time of such
dedication or conveyance.
B. The value of real estate dedicated for recreation or cultural purposes shall be
determined as the price of the land at the time of purchase by the land owner who is
making application for subdivision. Usability of land for development should be
considered when establishing the price (for example, development of flood prone land is
restricted by ordinance).
C. If agreement cannot be reached as to the credit for the real estate, an arbitration
procedure shall be invoked. The City and the applicant shall each select the name of one
arbitrator and shall immediately thereafter notify each other in writing of the name and
address of the person so selected. The two arbitrators so selected and named shall agree
upon and select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be final.
5.1.9 Private Recreation Facilities Credit: When a master plan of development allocates
space for a private recreational facility, with usage not open to the general public, to
serve three or more residential dwelling units such as, but not limited to, the following:
swimming pool, tennis court, recreational building or center, recreational facility area,
developed open space, or combination of any of the above, the Council may waive part
or all of the fee established by this Article. The size, quality and design of such facility
which will entitle such dwelling units to a credit on the fee otherwise required, and the
amount of such credit shall be determined by negotiation between the parties. If
agreement cannot be reached, an arbitration procedure, specified in Section 4.11.8.C,
shall be invoked.
5.1.10 Residential Planned Unit Development Credit: The City Council, in the case of a
Residential Planned Unit Development, may waive part or all of the fee established in
this Article. Such waiver may be granted when, in the opinion of the Council, common
areas, created and developed in a Residential Planned Unit Development pursuant to
Chapter 8 of the zoning Code; Article II, Section 8; and Article V, Section 11 of these
regulations provide recreation opportunity for the residents of said areas sufficient to
impose no measurable increment in the need for neighborhood park acreage.
5. 1.11 Public Recreational Facilities Credit: When a master plan of development
allocates space for a public recreational facility, with said facility constructed either
solely at that person's expense or in concert with others, and said facility serves the
general public, to serve three or more residential dwelling units, such as, but not limited
to, the following: swimming pool, tennis court, recreational building or center,
recreational facility area, area park, cultural facility, or combination of any of the above,
the City Council may waive part or all of the fee established in this Article if it is in
conformance with the recreation portion of the Comprehensive Plan.
5.1.12 Maintenance of Private Recreation Facilities: Maintenance of private recreation
facilities accepted by the City in lieu of recreation fees will be the responsibility of the
owner(s) or homeowners association(s). The City of Owasso will not maintain lands or
facilities not dedicated to the public.
30
5.2 EMERGENCY SIREN FEE
In order to provide adequate warning of severe weather for newly developing areas of
Owasso, an emergency siren fee shall be assessed on each acre of a newly created
subdivision. The emergency siren fee shall be assessed before the approval of the final
plat by the City Council and shall be considered a condition for plat approval.
5.2.1 Fees
A. Fee Imposed: An emergency siren fee is hereby imposed on the privilege of
subdividing any land within the City of Owasso and every person subdividing land
within the City of Owasso, shall pay to the City of Owasso such fee at the following rate:
B. Fee Schedule: Thirty -five ($35), unless a different amount is required by the City of
Owasso after the adoption of these regulations, per each acre subdivided.
C. Use of Funds: All fees collected under this Ordinance shall be used and expended for
the acquisition and/or purchase of emergency sirens only.
5.2.2 Place of Payment: The emergency siren fee shall be paid prior to recording the
subdivision plat. Said fee shall be paid in the Office of the City Planner.
5.2.3 Refund of Fees: Any fee paid to the City under this Ordinance for any subdivision
which is not recorded shall be refunded upon application of the applicant. Application for
refund must be received by the City Planner within two (2) years of the date of City
Council approval.
5.3 SANITARY SEWER PAYBACK FEES
In order to provide reimbursement to the City of Owasso for the cost of extending
sanitary sewer lines to drainage basins in various parts of the community, sanitary sewer
payback fees shall be assessed on a per acre basis to new residential and commercial
subdivisions that connect to municipally- funded sanitary sewer mains. These various
sanitary sewer payback fees shall be payable upon approval of the final plat.
CHAPTER 6. CHANGE OF LIMITS OF ACCESS
6.1 INTENTIONS
When land has been platted under this Regulation, or under other applicable law, and the
owner of all land affected proposes to add limits of no access to the plat, or to remove or
otherwise alter limits of no access on the plat, such action shall not require replatting, nor
shall it require vacation of the old plat.
6.2 APPLICATION
The owner shall request the change of limits of access in writing to the City Planner, pay
the application fee and shall submit drawings of the proposal. The Technical Advisory
Committee shall review the proposed change of access and evaluate whether the
proposed changes would increase problems with the public traffic flow, utility easements
and the implementation of various plans adopted by the City, or would create problems
with the flow of traffic on private streets owned by persons other than the applicant. The
31
Community Development Department shall review the proposed change of access and
either approve, approve with conditions or disapprove.
6.3 Specifications: The drawing shall include the proposed changes and all existing curb
cuts, buildings, drives, parking areas, easements, and other relevant items with their
distances from lot lines and adjacent streets.
CHAPTER 7. LOT SPLITS
7.1 INTENTIONS AND DEFINITION
This chapter is intended to provide for a simplified method of regulation of the
subdivision of small numbers of lots while still requiring that such subdivision meets all
the requirements of applicable ordinances and regulations.
A lot split is a minor subdivision of previously subdivided land. The Planning
Commission may approve a lot split that creates not more than three (3) lots fronting on
an existing, dedicated street, not involving any new street or road, or the extension of
municipal facilities, or the creation of any public improvements, and not adversely
affecting the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property, and not in conflict with any
provision or portion of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance (unless approved by
the Board of Adjustment) or these regulations.
7.2 APPLICATION PROCEDURE
The subdivider shall submit the lot split application to the City Planner on forms
provided by the Planner, pay the application fee in an amount as provided by ordinance,
and shall submit drawings of the proposal in accordance with the following
requirements:
7.2.1 Copies: Unless instructed otherwise by the City Planner, one AutoCAD electronic
copy and three copies of a scaled drawing shall accompany the application.
7.2.2 Specifications: The drawings shall include all existing and proposed lot lines, all
existing easements, all existing buildings and improvements and their distances from lot
lines, adjacent streets and their widths, and a north arrow and scale. At the discretion of
the Planning Commission, a detailed survey prepared by a registered land surveyor may
be required.
7.2.3 Size: The subdivider is encouraged to limit drawing sizes to 8' /z" by 14 ". If
drawings are larger than 81 /z" by 14 ", twenty -three (23) copies are required.
7.3 CITY PLANNER REVIEW
7.3.1 Distribute: The City Planner shall distribute copies of the application form and
drawings to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Planning Commission.
7.3.2 Field Check: The City Planner shall visually inspect the lots proposed to be split.
7.3.3 Review: The City Planner shall review the application for conformance with the
Zoning Code, PUD conditions, Board of Adjustment actions, these Subdivision
Regulations, and other city ordinances.
32
7.3.4 Schedule Hearings: The City Planner shall schedule the lot split to be heard before
the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Planning Commission.
7.3.5 Recommendation: The City Planner shall prepare a recommendation to the
Planning Commission which shall include comments of the Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) members and City departments having an interest in the proposal.
7.4 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW
The City Planner shall present the application at a regular Technical Advisory
Committee meeting where the lot split may be reviewed by the Committee. The
recommendation of the Technical Advisory Committee shall be compiled with that of the
City Planner's recommendation and the application shall be heard by the Planning
Commission.
7.5 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning Commission shall review the proposed lot split and either approve,
approve with conditions or disapprove the application. If the lot split is disapproved, the
applicant may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council.
7.6 APPROVAL GUIDELINES
The approval or disapproval of lot splits shall be based upon the following guidelines:
7.6.1 Lots:
A. Lot dimensions shall conform to Zoning Code standards. If the proposed tract(s) to be
split do(es) not meet minimum Zoning Code standards, variances of the Zoning Code
must be approved by the Board of Adjustment.
B. Corner lots should have such extra width and area as may be necessary to satisfy
appropriate Zoning Code setback requirements from both streets while ensuring that
adequate buildable space remains.
7.6.2 Access and Streets:
A. Where a property to be split is controlled by non - access provisions, no lot shall be
approved where such provision will preclude access for said lot. An amendment of
"limits of no access" on a recorded plat must be approved by the Planning Commission
and City Council and filed of record if there is a restricted access provision on a street of
the recorded plat on which the property has access. A denial of access change constitutes
a denial of the requested lot split.
B. The splitting of land shall provide each lot with frontage to a public street or highway,
so that the access of the lot owner or user is assured, as well as the layout of utilities,
garbage and waste removal, fire protection and public health and safety thereby
adequately assured.
C. Where land to be split contains within its boundaries areas designated for street right -
of -way on the Owasso Major Street and Highway Plan, the split shall not be approved
where street rights -of -way fail to conform to said plan except upon a finding that existing
33
structures lie in the right -of -way proposed by the Owasso Major Street and Highway
Plan.
7.6.3 Sewage Disposal: Where a tract to be split abuts a public sanitary sewer, no split
should create a lot which is cut off from said sewer.
7.6.4 Certificate of Approval: Approval shall be shown by certificate on the instrument
of transfer as required by state statute. The certification shall be signed by the Planning
Commission Chairperson or Vice Chairperson. The subdivider will then file the
instrument with the County Clerk, the approval being an official document that will be
contained in the abstract of the property being split.
CHAPTER 8. BUILDING PERMITS
8.1 INTENTIONS
Building permits shall be issuable after completion of the following items:
A. Final Plat Recorded. The final plat shall have been approved by the City Council,
certified, recorded with the appropriate county clerk, and certified originals returned to
the City Planner as provided herein.
B. City Engineer Approval. The City Engineer shall have approved the construction
plans for water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets.
C. Health Department Approval. The Oklahoma Department of Health shall have issued
certification numbers for the water and sanitary sewer plans.
D. Water and Sanitary Sewer. The water and sanitary sewer utilities shall have been
constructed per approval plans, inspected by the City Engineer and accepted for
maintenance by the City Council or another political subdivision having jurisdiction over
said utilities. Further, the Subdivider shall have delivered a two year maintenance bond
to the Public Works Director as required herein. Upon acceptance of water and sanitary
sewer utilities, up to 10% of the lots in a residential subdivision may be made eligible for
building permits.
E. Streets and Storm Sewer. Construction plans shall have been approved by the City
Engineer and either:
(1) the street and storm sewer improvements have been accepted for maintenance by the
City Council and a two year maintenance bond delivered to the Public Works Director;
or (2) the subdivider has delivered to the Public Works Director a two -year performance
bond or other surity for these improvements.
CHAPTER 9. DEFINITIONS AND USAGE
9.1 USAGE
For the purpose of these Regulations, certain terms and words are to be used and
interpreted as defined in this Chapter. Where terms are not defined, they shall have their
ordinarily accepted meanings or such as the context may imply.
34
9.1.1 Tense, Plural and Directives: Words used in the present tense shall include the
future tense, words in the singular number shall include the plural and words in the plural
number shall include the singular, except where the natural construction of the writing
indicates otherwise. The word "should" is directory and not mandatory. The word "shall"
is mandatory and directory.
9.1.2 Person, Herein and Regulations: A "person" includes an individual, corporation,
partnership and an incorporated association of persons such as a club. The word "herein"
means in these regulations. The word "regulations" means these Subdivision Regulations
for the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
9.2 WORDS AND TERMS DEFINED
ALLEY: A minor public or private right -of -way which gives a secondary means of
access to the rear or side of a property that has primary access to some other street.
Alleys may be used for public or private utilities, and public service, emergency or
private vehicles.
ARTERIAL STREET: See STREET, ARTERIAL in this section.
AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS: Those subdivision construction plans of
completed paving, drainage, water, sewer or other public improvements.
BLOCK: A grouping of subdivided lots intended for urban purposes, bounded by streets
or by a combination of streets and public parks, cemeteries, railroad right -of -way,
shorelines, waterways, or municipal boundaries.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: The Board of Adjustment of the City of Owasso
established in accordance with state law by city ordinance.
BOND: A type of security or collateral posted by the subdivider and approved by the
City Attorney which guarantees that all required improvements shall be maintained
according to the approved plans and requirements of Owasso Design Criteria and these
Subdivision Regulations.
BUILDING: A structure which is permanently affixed to the land, has one or more floors
and a roof, and is bounded by either another building with a common party wall, open
air, or the lot lines of a lot.
BUILDING PERMIT: A Permit required by the City of Owasso before any building
construction is commenced.
BUILDING SETBACK LINE: The horizontal distance from the point of measurement,
such as the centerline of an abutting street or the boundary line of an abutting zoning
district, to the nearest building wall.
CITY: The City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
CITY COUNCIL: The governing and legislative body of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
CITY (OFFICER): The word "City" followed by the name of any officer means any
officer or designee to such officer employed by the City of Owasso to fulfill any of the
duties of the office named.
CONSTRUCTION PLAN: The maps or drawings prepared by a registered professional
engineer accompanying a subdivision plat and showing the specific location and design
35
of improvements to be installed in the subdivision in accordance with the Owasso Design
Criteria and requirements of the City Engineer, Planning Commission and City Council
as a condition of the approval of the plat.
COUNTY: The County of Tulsa or the County of Rogers, Oklahoma.
COUNTY CLERK: The office of the clerk for Tulsa County or Rogers County,
Oklahoma.
COVENANTS: Agreements binding the owners of the lots of a subdivision as shown on
the face of a recorded subdivision plat.
DEDICATE: To set apart a portion of the area of a subdivision to a specific use(s) or to
the public or to a specific group.
DETENTION: The act of detaining stormwater as outlined in the Owasso Design
Criteria.
DEED OF DEDICATION: That portion of a plat that dedicates an area of a subdivision.
DESIGN CRITERIA: Engineering standards used in the design and construction of
subdivision improvements.
DEVELOPER: The owner of land proposed to be subdivided or a designee.
DEVELOPMENT: A tract of land which is subdivided and provided with all necessary
utilities and public improvements.
DISTRICT COURT: The District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma or Rogers County,
Oklahoma.
DOUBLE FRONTAGE: A situation in which a lot has access on two streets that do not
intersect.
EASEMENT: Authorization by a property owner for the use by another, and for a
specific purpose, of any designated part of his property.
FLOOD PLAIN: The area of land adjoining the channel of a river, stream or other
similar body of water which may be inundated by a flood that can be reasonably
expected to occur. The flood plain includes all lands within the limits of the 100 -year
flood plain as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FRONTAGE: That side of a lot abutting on a street or way to which access is available
for the lot.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT: The Tulsa County Oklahoma or Rogers County, Oklahoma
agency empowered by the Oklahoma State Department of Health to enforce health laws.
IMPROVEMENTS: Grading, streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, culverts, bridges, water
lines, sanitary sewer lines, force mains and lift stations, storm sewer lines, other utilities,
and other features required to support the development.
IMPROVEMENTS, OFF -SITE: A utility, structure, or modification of topography
located outside the property to be subdivided.
IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC: Any street, sidewalk, utility line, drainage way or other
facility for which the city may ultimately assume the responsibility for maintenance and
operation.
9M
IMPROVEMENTS, REQUIRED: Any improvement required by the Planning
Commission and City Council as a condition of approval of a subdivision plat.
LOCAL STREET: See STREET, MINOR (LOCAL) in this section.
LOT: A tract, plot or portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land intended as a unit
for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or for building
development.
LOT AREA: The total area measured on a horizontal plane, included within the lot
boundaries.
LOT DEPTH: The mean horizontal distance between the front and rear lot lines.
LOT SPLIT: A lot split is a minor subdivision of previously subdivided land. The
Planning Commission may approve a lot split that creates not more than three (3) lots
fronting on an existing, dedicated street, not involving any new street or road, or the
extension of municipal facilities, or the creation of any public improvements, and not
adversely affecting the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property, and not in conflict
with any provision or portion of the Comprehensive Plan, Major Street and Highway
Plan, Zoning Ordinance (unless approved by the Board of Adjustment) or these
regulations.
MAYOR: The Chief elected official of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma.
OPEN SPACE, PUBLIC: Land which may be dedicated to or reserved for acquisition for
general use by the public, including parks, recreation areas, school sites, community and
public building sites, and other similar lands. This specifically does not include floodway
drainage courses, public lakes and ponds or any area within the fully urbanized flood
plain, but may include other areas in the 100 year full urbanized flood plain.
OFF -SITE IMTROVEMENTS: See IMPROVEMENTS, OFF -SITE in this section.
OWNER: A person or any other legal entity having legal title to or sufficient proprietary
interest in the land sought to be subdivided under these regulations.
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: A Permit required by the City of Owasso, Oklahoma
before any subdivision improvement construction is commenced.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): A discretionary type of development for a
tract of land under single ownership or control, based upon an approved development
plan permitting flexibility of principal land uses, lot sizes and accessory uses not
otherwise available under conventional development standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION: The Owasso Planning Commission as established in
accordance with state law by city ordinance.
PLAT, FINAL: The final map or record of a subdivision and any accompanying
material, as described in these regulations, based on a Preliminary Plat with revisions, if
any, to be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval, denial,
or approval with conditions.
PLAT, PRELIMINARY: The drawing or drawings described in these regulations,
indicating the proposed manner or layout of the subdivision to be submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval.
37
PRE -PLAT CONFERENCE: A meeting between the Subdivider and the City Planner to
discuss the procedure for approval of a subdivision plat, provisions of the Zoning Code,
requirements as to general layout of streets, reservations of land, street improvements,
drainage, sewerage, fire protection, availability of existing services and utilities and
similar matters.
PRE- CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE: A meeting among the developer, the
subdivider or designee, contractors and the city staff prior to improvements construction.
REGISTERED ENGINEER: An engineer properly registered and licensed in the State of
Oklahoma.
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR: A land surveyor properly registered and licensed
in the State of Oklahoma.
REVERSE FRONTAGE: That side of a lot abutting on a street or way which no access
is available for the lot. See FRONTAGE and DOUBLE FRONTAGE in this section.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: A parcel of land, usually a strip, occupied or intended to be occupied
by a street, crosswalk, railroad, road, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, water
line, sanitary or storm sewer facility, or for any other public use. The use of the term
right -of -way for land platting purposes in connection with these regulations shall mean
that every right -of -way hereafter established and shown on a final plat is to be separate
and distinct from the lots and parcels adjoining such right -of -way and not included
within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. Rights -of -way intended for any
use involving maintenance by a public agency shall be dedicated to public use by the
owner of the land which is being subdivided.
SEPARATE INSTRUMENT: A document that dedicates land or accomplishes some
other task and is filed of record separately from the original subdivision plat documents.
SETBACK: The distance between a building and the nearest street right -of -way line or
property line. Also see BUILDING SETBACK LINE in this section.
STREET: A public or private right -of -way which affords the primary means of access to
abutting property or serves as a thoroughfare for vehicular traffic, or both, but excluding
alleys.
STREET, COLLECTOR: A street intended to move traffic from minor to arterial streets,
including the principal entrance and circulation street or streets of a development.
STREET, CUL -DE -SAC: A minor street with only one outlet and having a terminal for
the safe and convenient reversal of traffic movement including all emergency and service
vehicles.
STREET, MINOR (LOCAL): A trafficway of limited length that is not classified as a
Major Street or highway, providing direct access to abutting tracts of land and access to
more heavily traveled streets.
STREET, SERVICE ROAD: A minor street which is parallel and adjacent to major
streets, trafficways, highways or railroad rights -of -way and which provides access to
abutting properties and protection from through traffic.
SUBDIVIDER: A person undertaking the subdivision or resubdivision of a lot, tract or
parcel of land into two or more lots, or other subdivision of land for the purpose of
..�
transfer of ownership or development, whether immediate or future, including all
changes in lot lines.
SUBDIVISION: Any division of land into four (4) more lots, tracts or parcels for the
purpose of transfer of ownership or development, whether immediate or future, or any
resubdivision of land.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (T.A.C.): A committee composed of public
officials and utility company representatives to review and study all plats and minor
subdivision proposals and make recommendations concerning those subdivisions to the
Planning Commission.
ZONING CODE: A city ordinance regulating land use in the city.
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 932
DATE: October 30, 2008
BACKGROUND:
At the July 15, 2008 meeting, the Owasso City Council approved an Annexation request (OA 08-
02) of three acres located at the north end of Carlsbad Street, specifically 708 North Carlsbad, 710
North Carlsbad, and 711 North Carlsbad. Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 932 that formally
adopts the City Council's action of July 15, 2008.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 932.
ATTACHMENT:
Ordinance No. 932
CITY OF OWASSO
ORDINANCE NO. 932
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING, ADDING, AND ANNEXING TO THE CITY
OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW /4
OF SECTION 30, T21N, R14E, OF THE INDIAN BASE AND MERIDIAN,
TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, ACCORDING TO THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, PROVIDED THAT FROM AND
AFTER THE PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE THAT
ALL OF THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TERRITORY HEREIN
DESCRIBED SHALL BE A PART OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA, AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT ALL PERSONS
RESIDING THEREIN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION,
CONTROL, LAWS, AND ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA ESTABLISHING THE SAME AS PART OF WARD THREE OF
SAID CITY AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF THIS ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Title 11, Section 21 -103, et seq., of the
Oklahoma Statutes, the City of Owasso is permitted to annex additional territory providing a
petition in writing, signed by not less than three- fourths of the legal voters and owners of not less
than three - fourths (in value) of the property hereinafter described, the same being contiguous to
the corporate limits of the City of Owasso, requesting that said property be annexed and added to
the City of Owasso is submitted; and
WHEREAS, notice of the presentation of said Petition was given by the Petitioner by
publication in the Owasso Reporter, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma, and notice was given that said Petition would be considered by the Planning
Commission of the City of Owasso, at a meeting to be held on July 7, 2008 at 6:00 PM at Old
Central, Owasso, Oklahoma; and
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of July, 2008, said Petition was duly considered by the
Planning Commission and was determined to have complied with the provisions of Title 11,
Section 21 -103, et seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes, and further, that proper legal notice of
presentation of said petition had been given.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA,
Section 1. That the following described territory lying in Tulsa County, Oklahoma which
is contiguous to the present corporate limits of the City of Owasso and described in the petition
presented to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Title 11, Section 21 -103, et
seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes, and more particularly described as follows, to -wit:
1. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14
EAST OF THE I.B. &M. TULSA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA. BEGINNING
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THENCE
1,135 FEET NORTH AND 592 FEET WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH 180 FEET, THENCE EAST 144.4. FEET, THENCE SOUTH 180
FEET, THENCE WEST 144.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.596 ACRES
2. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14
EAST OF THE I.B. &M. TULSA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA. BEGINNING
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THENCE
1,135 FEET NORTH AND 452 FEET WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH 180 FEET, THENCE EAST 320 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 180
FEET, THENCE WEST 320 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING
1.304 ACRES
3. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14
EAST OF THE I.B. &M. TULSA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA. BEGINNING
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER THENCE 985
FEET NORTH AND 592 FEET WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE
NORTH 150 FEET, THENCE EAST 144.4 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 150 FEET,
THENCE WEST 144.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.497
ACRES
be, and the same is hereby annexed to, made a part of, and added to the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma, and the corporate limits thereof be and are hereby extended to include the above
described territory and real estate.
Section 2. That from and after the passage and publication of this Ordinance, the real
estate and territory described in Section 1 hereof shall be a part of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma, and in Ward Four thereof, and all persons residing therein, and all property situated
thereon, shall be and are hereby declared to be subject to the jurisdiction, control, laws, and
ordinances of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, in all respects and particulars.
Section 3. That from and after the effective date of this Ordinance, the real estate and
territory described in Section 1 hereof, shall be deemed to be in the RS -3 (Residential) zoning
district of the City of Owasso in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4 of the Owasso
Zoning Code.
Section 4. That there be filed in the office of the County Clerk of Tulsa County,
Oklahoma, a true and correct copy of this Ordinance, together with an accurate map of the
territory hereby annexed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of November, 2008.
Stephen Cataudella, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sherry Bishop, City Clerk
APPROVED:
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: LARISSA DARNABY
CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 933
DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2008
BACKGROUND:
At the October 21, 2008 meeting, the Owasso City Council approved a request for the
annexation of ten acres of land, located about 660' north of East 96`h Street North and
half of a mile east of North 1291h East Avenue. The Council took the action on this
annexation request following the Planning Commission's approval on October 13, 2008.
Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 933 that formally adopts the City Council's action of
October 21, 2008.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 933
ATTACHMENT:
1. Ordinance No. 933
2. Exhibit "A"
CITY OF OWASSO
ORDINANCE NO. 933
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING, ADDING, AND ANNEXING TO THE CITY
OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA, ADDITIONAL LANDS AND TERRITORY IN
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER, OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE
I.B. & M, TULSA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ACCORDING TO THE
U.S. GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, PROVIDED THAT FROM AND
AFTER THE PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE THAT
ALL OF THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TERRITORY HEREIN
DESCRIBED SHALL BE A PART OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA, AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT ALL PERSONS
RESIDING THEREIN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION,
CONTROL, LAWS, AND ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF OWASSO,
OKLAHOMA ESTABLISHING THE SAME AS PART OF WARD ONE OF
SAID CITY AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF THIS ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Title 11, Section 21 -103, et seq., of the
Oklahoma Statutes, the City of Owasso is permitted to annex additional territory providing a
petition in writing, signed by not less than three- fourths of the legal voters and owners of not less
than three- fourths (in value) of the property hereinafter described, the same being contiguous to
the corporate limits of the City of Owasso, requesting that said property be annexed and added to
the City of Owasso is submitted; and
WHEREAS, notice of the presentation of said Petition was given by the Petitioner by
publication in the Owasso Reporter, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Owasso, Oklahoma, and notice was given that said Petition would be considered by the City
Council of the City of Owasso, at a meeting to be held on October 21, 2008 at 6:30 PM at Old
Central, Owasso, Oklahoma; and
WHEREAS, on the 21St day of October, 2008, said Petition was duly considered by the
City Council and was determined to have complied with the provisions of Title 11, Section 21-
103, et seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes, and further, that proper legal notice of presentation of
said petition had been given.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OWASSO, OKLAHOMA,
Section 1. That the following described territory lying in Tulsa County, Oklahoma which
is contiguous to the present corporate limits of the City of Owasso and described in the petition
presented to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Title 11, Section 21 -103, et
seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes, and more particularly described as follows, to -wit:
The Northwest Quarter (NW /Q) of the Southwest Quarter (SW /Q) of the Southeast Quarter (SE /Q) of
Section Sixteen (16), Township Twenty -One North (T- 21 -N), Range Fourteen East (R -14 -E) of the
Indian Base and Meridian, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof. Containing ten (10) acres more or less.
be, and the same is hereby annexed to, made a part of, and added to the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma, and the corporate limits thereof be and are hereby extended to include the above
described territory and real estate.
Section 2. That from and after the passage and publication of this Ordinance, the real
estate and territory described in Section 1 hereof shall be a part of the City of Owasso,
Oklahoma, and in Ward One thereof, and all persons residing therein, and all property situated
thereon, shall be and are hereby declared to be subject to the jurisdiction, control, laws, and
ordinances of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma, in all respects and particulars.
Section 3. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, in conflict with this ordinance are
hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict only.
Section 4. If any part or parts of this ordinance are deemed unconstitutional, invalid
or ineffective, the remaining portion shall not be affected but shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days
from the date of final passage as provided by state law.
Section 6. That there be filed in the office of the County Clerk of Tulsa County,
Oklahoma, a true and correct copy of this Ordinance, together with an accurate map of the
territory hereby annexed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of November 4, 2008.
Stephen Cataudella, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sherry Bishop, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie Lombardi, City Attorney
I
a
a
z
0
a
0
i
ti
TA
SUBJECT PROPERTY I CITY OF OWASSO
9/15/08
Legend 0
North
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSE ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO
REPRESENT AN ACCURATE AND TRUE SCALE. USE OF THIS MAP IS WITHOUT
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION BY CITY OF OWASSO OF ITS ACCURACY.
111 N. Main Street
P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
918.376.1500
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: JOHN W. FEARY
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE
MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
DATE: October 29, 2008
BACKGROUND:
As part of Vision 2025 Downtown /Neighborhood Rehabilitation Program, Tulsa County voters
endorsed a $1.1 million expenditure to promote community beautification and economic vitality
in the Owasso Downtown area. The project — which is in accordance with the Owasso
Downtown Development Plan (2001) — calls for the burial of overhead utilities, construction of
streetscaping, and installation of ornamental lighting and signs along Main Street between E. 76
Street North and 3ra Street North.
On December 12, 2007, Council awarded the bid for the construction of streetscape
improvements to Crossland Heavy Contractors, Incorporated in the amount of $851,019.61.
Construction of the improvements and all items requiring correction have been completed,
realizing an under run of $6,678.75, for a revised contract amount of $844,340.86.
FUNDING:
Funding for the majority of this project has been allocated by Vision 2025. Additionally, on
December 18, 2007, Council authorized the use of $200,000 from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund and
$100,000 from the Capital Improvements Fund in order to fully fund this project.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends City Council approval of final payment to Crossland Heavy Contractors in the
amount of $84,434.09.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Crossland Heavy Contractors final pay request
11APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Page 1 of 7
TO: City of Owasso Contract Date: 12/18/2007
PO Box 180
111 North Main Application Date: 9/11/2008
Owasso, OK 74055
Period To: 9/11/2008
FROM: Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
PO Box 350 Distribution To: Owner
833 S. East Avenue Architect
Columbus, KS 66725 Contractor
Engineer
PROJECT: Owasso Main Street
CONTRACT FOR: Streetscape Enhancements, Phase I
11CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.
Continuation sheet is attached:
1. Original Contract Sum $
2. Net Change by Change Orders $
3. Contract Sum to Date (Line a & 2) $ 851,019.61
4. Total Completed & Stored to Date $ 844,340.86
(Column G on Continuation Sheet)
S. Retainage: a. 10% of Complete Work $ _
(Column D & E on Continuation Sheet) - FINAL
b. _% of Stored Material $
(Column F on Continuation Sheet)
Total Retainage (Line 5a & 5b) $ _
6. Total Earned Less Retainage $ 844,340.86
(Line 4 less Line 5 Total)
7. Less Previous Certificates for Payment $
8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $
9. Balance to Finish, Plus Retainage $
(Line 3 less Line 6)
851,019.61
759,906.77
84,434.09
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY:
Change Orders approved in previous
months by OWNER
TOTALS
Approved this month
Number
Date Approved
Page 2 of 7
ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
TOTALS $ $
Net Change by Change Orders $ _
The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, information
and belief, the WORK covered by this Application for payment has been completed in
accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for
Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the
Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due.
CONTRACTOR: Cr s a y Con ctors, Inc.
By' Date: oy
STATE OF YAC,
SS
Subscribed CO U NTY O F (�C�14~} QQ
Subscribed and sworn to before me this W*'�I day ofd ,
Not y Public
Y PGA' MISTY HARRIS
f 0 NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF ONSAS i
Page 3 of 7
ARCHITECTS /ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT
In accordance with the contract documents, based on on -site observations and the date
comprising the above application, the Architect /Engineer certifies to the Owner that to the best
of the Architect's /Engineer's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has progressed as
indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the
Contractor is entitled to payment of the amount certified.
AMOUNT CERTIFIED 7, E
(Attach explanation if amount cer ified differs from the amount applied for.)
ARCHITECT /ENGINEER:
By: Date:
Thiertificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the contractor
named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment without prejudice to any rights
of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract.
CONTINUATION SHEET
Application of Certification for Payment, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached.
Application Number:
Period to: 9/11/2008
9/11/2008
In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where
variable retainage for line items may apply.
Page 4 of 7
A B C D E F G H I
WORK COMPLETED
R E) MATERIALS
TOTAL COMPLETED
BALANCE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SCHEDULED
FROM PREVIOUS
WORK COMPLETED
PRESENTLY STORED
AND STORED
%
TO FINISH
RETAINAGE
NO.
OF WORK
VALUE
APPLICATION
THIS PERIOD
(NOT IN D o
TO DATE (D +E +F)
(G /C)
(C -G)
001
UNCLASSIFIED BORROW
1,700.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
1,700.00
0.00
002
TEMP BALE BARRIER
120.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
120.00
0.00
003
TEMP SILT FENCE
375.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
375.00
0.00
004
AGG BASE
17,712.00
17,712.00
0.00
0.00
17,712.00
100.0%
0.00
1,771.20
005
TACK COAT
78.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
78.40
0.00
006
ASPHALT CONC TYPE A
12,558.00
12,558.00
0.00
0.00
12,558.00
100.0%
0.00
1,255.80
007
APPHALT CONC TYPE B
35,700.00
47,475.96
0.00
0.00
47,475.96
133.0%
- 11,775.96
4,747.60
008
6" PC CONC PAVEMENT
46,662.00
42,423.92
0.00
0.00
42,423.92
90.9%
4,238.08
4,242.39
009
COLD MILLING PAVEMENT
17,336.00
6,160.00
0.00
0.00
6,160.00
35.5%
11,176.00
616.00
010
CURB & GUTTER 4" MNT
19,380.00
27,450.00
0.00
0.00
27,450.00
141.6%
- 8,070.00
2,745.00
011
CURB & GUTTER 6" BAR
20,610.00
17,272.50
0.00
0.00
17,272.50
83.8%
3,337.50
1,727.25
012
4" CONC SIDEWALK
74,817.00
66,979.83
0.00
0.00
66,979.83
89.5%
7,837.17
6,697.98
013
MANHOLE 4' DIAMETER
7,200.00
7,200.00
0.00
0.00
7,200.00
100.0%
0.00
720.00
014
INLET CICI DES 2(D)
6,200.00
6,200.00
0.00
0.00
6,200.00
100.0%
0.00
620.00
015
MANHOLES ADJ TO GRD
1,700.00
3,400.00
0.00
0.00
3,400.00
200.0%
- 1,700.00
340.00
016
VALV BOXES ADJ TO GRD
3,500.00
5,000.00
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
142.9%
- 1,500.00
500.00
017
MTR BOXES ADJ TO GRD
1,500.00
11000.00
0.00
0.00
1,000.00
66.7%
500.00
100.00
018
FIRE HYDRANT RESET
2,400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2,400.00
0.00
Page 5 of 7
019
18" RC PIPE CL 111
2,220.00
2,220.00
0.00
0.00
2,220.00
100.0%
0.00
222.00
020
REM CONC DRIVEWAY
3,865.05
3,974.05
0.00
0.00
3,974.05
102.8%
- 109.00
397.41
021
REM CONC PAVEMENT
34,524.00
35,799.82
0.00
0.00
35,799.82
103.7%
- 1,275.82
3,579.98
022
REM CURB & GUTTER
6,504.80
6,404.93
0.00
0.00
6,404.93
98.5%
99.87
640.49
023
REM DRAINAGE INLETS
3,400.00
3,400.00
0.00
0.00
3,400.00
100.0%
0.00
340.00
024
REM SIDEWALK
43,197.00
51,842.18
0.00
0.00
51,842.18
120.0%
- 8,645.18
5,184.22
025
MOBILIZATION
63,200.00
63,200.00
0.00
0.00
63,200.00
100.0%
0.00
6,320.00
026
STAKING
10,500.00
10,500.00
0.00
0.00
10,500.00
100.0%
0.00
1,050.00
027
2" CONDUIT BORED
27,820.00
42,900.00
0.00
0.00
42,900.00
154.2%
- 15,080.00
4,290.00
028
2" CONDUIT TRENCHED
44,811.00
44,863.00
0.00
0.00
44,863.00
100.1%
-52.00
4,486.30
029
PULL BOX SIZE 1
1,311.00
437.00
0.00
0.00
437.00
33.3%
874.00
43.70
030
SHEET ALUM SIGNS
221.00
221.00
0.00
0.00
221.00
100.0%
0.00
22.10
031
1 -3/4" SQUARE POST
308.00
308.00
0.00
0.00
308.00
100.0%
0.00
30.80
032
TRAFFIC STRIPE TAPE
10,270.40
10,598.70
0.00
0.00
10,598.70
103.2%
- 328.30
1,059.87
033
TRAFFIC STRIPE ARROW
4,200.00
2,450.00
0.00
0.00
2,450.00
58.3%
1,750.00
245.00
034
TRAFFIC STRIP SYMBL
430.00
1,290.00
0.00
0.00
1,290.00
300.0%
- 860.00
129.00
035
TRAFF STRIPE WORDS
2,300.00
2,300.00
0.00
0.00
2,300.00
100.0%
0.00
230.00
036
CONST TRAFFIC CTRL
16,001.00
16,001.00
0.00
0.00
16,001.00
100.0%
0.00
1,600.10
037
REM EXISTING SIGNS
1,200.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
1,200.00
0.00
038
REM & RESET SIGN
4,030.00
4,030.00
0.00
0.00
4,030.00
100.0%
0.00
403.00
039
PEDESTRIAN PAVERS
51,199.35
51,199.35
0.00
0.00
51,199.35
100.0%
0.00
5,119.94
040
CROSSWALK PAVERS
24,610.04
24,610.00
0.00
0.00
24,610.00
100.0%
0.00
2,461.00
041
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
27,400.00
27,400.00
0.00
0.00
27,400.00
100.0%
0.00
2,740.00
042
IRRIG SYSTEM SLEEVES
7,360.00
6,918.40
0.00
0.00
6,918.40
94.0%
441.60
691.84
043
6" CONCRETE CURB
6,800.00
4,182.00
0.00
0.00
4,182.00
61.5%
2,618.00
418.20
044
6" BENCH
12,000.00
12,000.00
0.00
0.00
12,000.00
100.0%
0.00
1,200.00
045
LITTER RECEPTACLE
5,600.00
5,600.00
0.00
0.00
5,600.00
100.0%
0.00
560.00
046
PLANTER POTS LARGE
5,390.00
5,390.00
0.00
0.00
5,390.00
100.0%
0.00
539.00
047
PLANTER POTS SMALL
3,780.00
3,780.00
0.00
0.00
3,780.00
100.0%
0.00
378.00
048
RAISED PLANTER
47,200.00
47,200.00
0.00
0.00
47,200.00
100.0%
0.00
4,720.00
049
BERMUDA SOD
2,300.00
1,900.00
0.00
0.00
1,900.00
82.6%
400.00
190.00
050
CAL WTR OAK ST TREES
8,280.00
8,280.00
0.00
0.00
8,280.00
100.0%
0.00
828.00
Page 6 of 7
051
LANDSCAPING
14,000.00
14,000.00
0.00
0.00
14,000.00
100.0%
0.00
1,400.00
052
6" CONC EDGE RESTRAI
7,650.00
14,679.50
0.00
0.00
14,679.50
191.9%
- 7,029.50
1,467.95
053
8" CONC EDGE RESTRAI
8,800.00
8,946.72
0.00
0.00
8,946.72
101.7%
- 146.72
894.67
054
CONCRETE BUMPERS
2,538.00
2,538.00
0.00
0.00
2,538.00
100.0%
0.00
253.80
055
PROJECT ALLOWANCE
38,000.00
13,760.00
0.00
0.00
13,760.00
36.2%
24,240.00
1,376.00
056
LIGHT POLE BASE
17,940.00
17,940.00
0.00
0.00
17,940.00
100.0%
0.00
1,794.00
057
PRECAST LOGO EMBLEMS
4,800.00
4,800.00
0.00
0.00
4,800.00
100.0%
0.00
480.00
058
12 "X12" DI GATE
630.00
630.00
0.00
0.00
630.00
100.0%
0.00
63.00
059
8" HD POLY PIPE
4,760.00
4,760.00
0.00
0.00
4,760.00
100.0%
0100
476.00
060
ASPH PATCH BASE REP
255.00
255.00
0.00
0.00
255.00
100.0%
0.00
25.50
061
MAKE CONTRACT WORK
- 134.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
- 134.39
0.00
851,019.61
844,340.86
0.00
0.00
844,340.86
6,678.75
84,434.09
STATE OF )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
Page 7 of 7
The undersigned architect, contractor, engineer or supplier, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, on oath
says that this invoice or claim is true and correct. Affiant further states that the work, services or
materials as shown by this invoice or claim have been completed or supplied in accordance with the
plans, specifications, orders or requests furnished the affidavit. Affiant further states that he/she has made
no payment directly or indirectly to any elected official, officer or employee of the State of Oklahoma,
any county or local subdivision of the state, of money or any other thing of value to obtain payment.
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
(Company Name) (Arcktect, Contractor, Engineer or Supplier)
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of L `YUWI 20d.
Notary Pu tic or Cleirk or Judge
p&m MISTY HARRIS Wx
E� NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE F KANSAS
�{�ftpps�iva.
?` �s 1 l 2
CONSENT OF SURETY
TO FINAL PAYMENT
ALA Doctinnent G707
Bond No. 08906629
OWNFR
ARC'.HITr,CT
CONTRACTOR
SURUY
OTHER
TO OWNE?, ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NCB.:
(Name andadilrvsr)
City of Owasso
111 N. Main Street CONTRACT FOR. Construction
Owasso, OK 74055
PROJECT: CONTRACT DA'ITID: December 18, 2007
(NRrru Rrrrtrrr#rfi�s�}
Main Street Streetscape Enhancements, Phase I - Project No. 7016EW
In accordance with .the provisions ctf the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as indic atett ab(tve, the
(hase)t name wid Rddrz ssofSWrq))
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
1400 American Lane, Tower I, 19th Floor
Schaumburg, IL 60196 -1056
on bond of
(h7a rs na)ne trYTil adamm uJCorztrcrctwy
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
PO Box 350
Columbus, KS 66725
■
■
■
■
■
SUR.EW,
, CONTRACTOR,
hereby approves of the final payment to the Contractor, and agrees that final payment to the Contractor shall not relieve the Surety of
any of its obligations to
lfra�u rt rru£neRnd addtesv afOu9rer)
City of Owasso
111 N. Main Street
Owasso, OK 74055
as set fbab in said Surety's bond.
IN WITNB'S WHEREOF, the surety has hereunto set its hand can this date: September 10, 2008
jfYma in u 018r); the rrron6 folA=V d $1, rte 717rrriL?K d!rTe RtTCl l eRr )
Attest-
(Seal): Mart L. Gilfillan
Fidelity and Deposit CompgDy-afMaryland
(Sx
(.5�trfrt£rYY'O,fRt)t)IOY� !2' )TtRlilY+)
Ashley Rose Attorney -in -Fact
rhi)rtad arvau Rlyd 1,114r)
, OWNER,
G707-1994
Power of Attorney
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, and the
COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, corporations of the '.S aryland, by
THEODORE G. MARTINEZ, Vice President, and GERALD F. HALEY, Assista c suance of authority
granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Companies, wt r� n the side hereof and are
hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date her in ppoint Stanley G.
WILKERSON, Claudia J. NADEAU, S. Mar 1 artha L. GILFILLAN,
Tracey A. NASH and Kylee W. HEU f a e and lawful agent and Attomey -in -Fact, to
make, execute, seal and deli r,` W�eh its act and deed: any and all bonds and
undertakings, and g6en.1 suc n rig s in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said
Companies, as fully�i purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the
regularly elected off C ny at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney
revokes that issued o Stanley G. WILKERSON, Claudia J. NADEAU, S. Mark WILKERSON, Ashley Rose
GORDON, Martha L. GILFILLAN, dated December 6, 2005.
The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI,
Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Companies, and is now in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice - President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and
affixed the Corporate Seals of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, and the COLONIAL
AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, this 6th day of November, A.D. 2006.
ATTEST:
F,�p 4fPpsfj C�j�,
UZ SEAL
' 01M
0 V
State of Maryland 1 ss:
City of Baltimore f
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Gerald F. Haley Assistant Secretary
By:
Theodore G. Martinez
On this 6th day of November, A.D. 2006, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly
commissioned and qualified, came THEODORE G. MARTINEZ, Vice President, and GERALD F. HALEY, Assistant
Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, and the COLONIAL AMERICAN
CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who
executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn,
severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Companies aforesaid, and that the seals
affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seals of said Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and their
signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said
Corporations.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above
written.
' ^`�:, :�U- {y\''l I'll ��.H/,'�•�•� "�'" �'d't/'1'�.T
Constance A. Dunn Notary Public
My Commission Expires: July 14, 2011
POA -F 076 -0008
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
FROM: ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF STONE CANYON
DATE: October 30, 2008
BACKGROUND:
On September 8, 2008 the Owasso Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the
annexation of the undeveloped portion of Stone Canyon's two northern sections. Stone Canyon
is a large multi -use development proposed for the area roughly between North 1615` East Avenue
and North 193rd East Avenue on the south side of East 70h Street North, stretching south to State
Highway 266 (also known as East 40h Street North and Port Road). The entire development
area is 3,330.95 acres, and was placed within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved by
Rogers County on October 17, 2005.
The portion that the Planning Commission recommended for annexation is approximately 990
acres, and includes the two northern square miles of Stone Canyon except for 45 acres owned by
the rock quarry and the three subdivisions currently under development northwest of the
intersection of E. 66th St. N. and N. 193rd E. Ave.
PROPOSED LAND USES WITHIN STONE CANYON DEVELOPMENT:
A variety of land uses are approved for Stone Canyon, though the lion's share of the acreage is
reserved for single - family residential use. The specific breakdown of land uses is as follows:
1.
Single - family residential:
2,655.87 acres
2.
Multi - family residential:
60 acres
3.
Commercial:
99.02 acres
4.
Mining:
458.86 acres
5.
Industrial:
36.01 acres
6.
Open Space:
21.19 acres
Though the acreages are not yet determined, the developer proposes locations for an elementary
school and a fire station within Stone Canyon in addition to the above uses.
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
Land bordering Stone Canyon within the Owasso fenceline is predominantly used for single -
family purposes, with examples of subdivisions being Rockford, La Strange, Timbergate, and
Oakridge. Gundy's airport lies north of Stone Canyon, and the Anchor Stone rock quarry lies to
the west. Additionally, there are over 500 undeveloped acres bordering Stone Canyon within
Owasso's fenceline.
PRESENT ZONING:
Stone Canyon PUD - Rogers County
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:
The first step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is annexation. Annexation is
the method whereby land located outside the City limits is made a part of the City. Property
owners and land developers sometimes choose to have their property annexed into Owasso in
order to receive Owasso municipal services, such as police and fire protection, refuse collection,
and sanitary sewer.
The second step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is rezoning, and can
happen concurrently with annexation. In order to develop the property the land must be zoned
for particular kinds of uses, such as residential, office, commercial, or industrial. Rezoning
decisions are made in accordance with the growth policy displayed in the Owasso Master Plan.
The third step in the development of a piece of property in Owasso is platting. A preliminary
plat is required for any development that proposes to divide land into two or more lots.
Preliminary plats illustrate the development concept for the property, and are often modified
significantly after being reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and the Owasso
Planning Commission. Sometimes, difficult development issues such as existing utility lines,
wells, or easements are brought to light at the preliminary plat stage and must be remedied prior
to development.
ANNEXATION REVIEW PROCESS:
The annexation process is initiated when a property owner submits a petition to the City of
Owasso requesting that the City bring the property into the City limits.
The applicant must submit as part of the request a signed petition requesting the annexation, an
accurate legal description and map of the property being requested for annexation, and a certified
300' radius report so that staff may send legal notices to surrounding property owners. Upon
receipt of all appropriate materials, the staff initiates the review process which begins with a
thorough analysis of the request.
The annexation request is then presented to the Owasso Annexation Committee for review and
recommendation. The Annexation Committee is made up of staff, elected officials, and citizens.
The Committee reviews the petition for compliance with the Annexation Policy and establishes a
recommendation to the Owasso Planning Commission.
The Owasso Planning Commission holds a public hearing to determine if the property is
compliant with the Owasso Annexation Policy and establishes a recommendation to the Owasso
City Council.
N
The Owasso City Council will make the final determination to annex the property or refuse
annexation. If the property is annexed into the City limits, an ordinance officially declaring the
annexation is written and adopted by the City Council. Once adopted, the ordinance is circulated
to the appropriate regional and national agencies for recording and altering maps.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF ANNEXATION:
According to Oklahoma statutes, the City of Owasso may annex this property with the consent of
the property owner as long as the territory is contiguous to the existing incorporated limits of the
City. While the property is not adjacent with the developed portion of the city's limits, the
property does lie contiguous to the city's fenceline, a 66' wide strip of incorporated area,
satisfying the statutory requirement. Owasso ordinance number 346 annexed this 66' wide
fenceline, and was passed on October 18, 1985.
According to municipal requirements for annexation, once the City of Owasso receives a request
from the property owner for the territory to be made a part of the incorporated area, the request is
reviewed by the Annexation Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The
Annexation Review Committee originally considered the annexation at their meeting on
November 28, 2007. At that meeting, the committee determined that the Stone Canyon territory
requested for annexation is serviceable by the City of Owasso and recommended approval of the
annexation.
However, the annexation process was paused after the November Annexation Review
Committee meeting so that the issue of fire service, an on -going concern for the development,
could be addressed. The staff brought the annexation request back to the committee on May 28,
2008, where the committee reaffirmed it's recommendation that the annexation be approved.
The staff is now ready to bring the request to the City Council. On September 8, 2008 the
Owasso Planning Commission considered the annexation at a public hearing, and voted to
approve a recommendation that the City Council annex the property. The City Council will then
consider the annexation request.
ANALYSIS:
The portion that the Planning Commission and city staff recommend for annexation is
approximately 990 acres, and includes the two northern square miles of Stone Canyon except for
45 acres owned by the rock quarry and the three subdivisions currently under development
northwest of the intersection of E. 66th St. N. and N. 193rd E. Ave (please see the
"RECOMMENDATION" section on page 9). It is the applicant's intention to develop the
property for a variety of uses, including residential subdivisions, an elementary school, and a fire
station. The property has already been placed within a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The
applicant has requested that the land be annexed into Owasso so that the development will be
able to receive municipal services.
These two square miles form a part of a development known as Stone Canyon, a large multi -use
community planned to extend from East 76th Street to the north to Highway 266 to the south.
Over 3,000 acres in size, Stone Canyon as a whole proposes a variety of uses, including
residential uses of varying densities, commercial and office uses, an elementary school, rock
quarrying, and recreational uses such as a golf course and hiking trails. The terrain located
3
within Stone Canyon is quite diverse; the northern portions of the development (those requested
to be annexed) are characterized by gently rolling pastureland, while the southern part of the
development contains steep rocky canyons and bluffs. Currently, Stone Canyon does not have
sanitary sewer service. It receives water from Rogers County Rural Water District #3, and lies
within the Limestone fire district.
Three subdivisions within Stone Canyon (not included with the annexation recommendation)
totaling 252 acres and 174 residential lots have been approved by Rogers County. All three of
these additions are located northwest of the intersection of North 193rd East Avenue and East 66th
Street North. These neighborhoods occupy the southeastern portion of the territory requested for
annexation.
The property is bounded to the north and east by large -lot residential properties of varying
densities. Land to the south of the property is still undeveloped, while the rock quarry is situated
west of the property. To date, the staff has not received any questions or comments from
surrounding property owners.
The property is accessible via East 76th Street North, and lies within the Rogers County Rural
Water District #3 water service area.
PROPOSED WASTEWATERLINE:
The City of Owasso is currently considering extending a 10" gravity interceptor to the western
boundary of the Stone Canyon development. The cost of such an extension is estimated to total
$4.8 million, plus $358,000 for engineering and design. It is anticipated that the developers of
Stone Canyon would then extend the sanitary sewerline into the development to serve the various
uses such as the elementary school, fire station, commercial area, multi - family area, and a
portion of the single - family area. In total, 3,843 acres both within Stone Canyon and outside
Stone Canyon could be made serviceable by the proposed sanitary sewerline. A payback in the
amount of $1,300 per acre would be required for any existing or future developments to be
connected with the sewerline.
DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISIONS BEING CONSTRUCTED WITHIN STONE
CANYON:
Three single - family subdivisions within Stone Canyon have already been approved by Rogers
County. These additions are located at the northwest corner of E. 66th St. N. and N. 193' E.
Ave., and were included within the applicant's original petition for annexation, but are not
recommended for annexation by the Planning Commission or the staff (please see the
"RECOMMENDATION" section on page 9). There are houses under construction in this area.
These subdivisions are accessible via North 193rd East Avenue, and are recorded as follows:
1.
Settler's Creek at Stone Canyon
48 lots
71 acres
2.
Tanglewood at Stone Canyon
74 lots
93 acres
3.
Lakes at Stone Canyon
52 lots
88 acres
The sizes of the single - family lots within these three developments range from 0.79 acres
(34,323 square feet) to 1.49 acres (64,913 square feet). The attached City Engineer's report
4
details the City's findings related to the infrastructure of the three subdivisions, synopsized
below.
STORMWATER DRAINAGE -
In many aspects, the stormwater drainage provided for the three subdivisions is satisfactory,
although the stormwater system falls short of meeting the requirements of the Owasso
Engineering Design Criteria.
The most concerning observation about the stormwater drainage is that there is a significant
amount of silt impacting the ditches and threatening to clog the culverts within the system. If the
capacity of the stormwater system is to be maximized, this silt will have to be removed.
All three of the new subdivisions drain to the west through Stone Canyon property to a basin that
will be used to provide detention for almost all of Stone Canyon — a proposed 60 to 80 acre lake
to be located in the western section requested for annexation by Owasso.
The subdivisions have been designed with borrow ditches instead of curbs, gutters, and inlets.
Sidewalks have not been designed for these subdivisions.
The basic findings of the engineering review are: 1) that the driveway culverts should be 6"
larger than the minimum diameter indicated to be appropriate by the hydraulic analysis, 2) that
the ditch velocities should be increased to at least 2.5 feet per second, and 3) that the borrow
ditches should be constructed with a trickle channel at the bottom of the ditches.
STREETS AND GRADING —
The streets within these residential subdivisions do not meet City of Owasso standards. The
major deficiencies of most concern are 1) the pavement thickness is considerably less than the
6!/2" required by the City and 2) not all of the road sections are bordered with a 2' shoulder.
In order to meet the needs of local traffic, school buses, and refuse collection vehicles, the
Owasso Engineering Design Criteria call for a minimum thickness of 6%2" for street pavement.
The pavement thickness found in the subdivisions varies from 1 %2" to 4%2 ". The staff believes
that the roads constructed in the subdivisions will have a significantly shorter life than roads built
within Owasso that meet the design criteria. The base under the roads is believed to be
acceptable. The roads' sub -base is compacted to 95% standard density; however, no sub -base
treatment (modifications with lime or fly ash) was performed to account for the presence of
plastic soils.
Some of the completed portions of the pavement are without 2' shoulders. Such shoulders
should be constructed with streets that do not have curbs and gutters, in order to provide support
for the pavement. The lack of these 2' shoulders will likely result in pavement degradation,
particularly at the pavement edge.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT —
These three subdivisions (174 lots) are intended to have private, individual, aerobic sewer
treatment systems. Further, the same amount of area (and likely another 150 to 200 lots) to the
5
north of these subdivisions within the territory requested for annexation has been proposed to be
constructed with aerobic sewer treatment systems. The City of Owasso is allowed to permit such
aerobic systems within the city limits. However, the staff has serious concerns about the long-
term viability of aerobic treatment. The maintenance of such systems will be left to the
homeowners. If the systems are not properly maintained, the City of Owasso could be
compelled to eventually provide sanitary sewer service to these residential additions if the
annexation is approved.
The Owasso Wastewater Treatment Plant does have the capacity to treat the anticipated increase
in flow resulting from the Stone Canyon development.
WATER —
Water service to Stone Canyon will be provided by Rogers County Rural Water District No. 3.
The waterline designs appear to be satisfactory for the most part. The major issue of concern
with the water system is that the fire hydrants proposed for the first three subdivisions in Stone
Canyon are two -way hydrants. These hydrants are inadequate for fire- fighting purposes. Three -
way fire hydrants should be constructed to allow for the ability to adequately fight fires.
OWASSO ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA:
The Owasso Engineering Design Criteria do not currently allow for developments that include
borrow ditches for street sections, nor do the criteria allow for aerobic systems — sanitary sewer
systems are required unless a special exemption is permitted by the Public Works Director.
The staff finds that it can be appropriate for estate developments (such as the type allowed in the
RE zoning District) with lots of at least 24,000 square feet in size to be developed without
sidewalks and with borrow ditches along street sections, provided that the streets are bordered
with a sufficient shoulder. Therefore, the staff is prepared to bring forward a recommendation
that the Engineering Design Criteria be revised to allow for streets with borrow ditches for
developments containing lots at least 24,000 square feet in size — RE zoning or larger. Further,
the staff is prepared to recommend that such developments not be required to include sidewalks.
The staff also finds that the current wastewater treatment regulations are appropriate; individual
aerobic systems should not be allowed for developments within the city limits and sanitary sewer
systems should be required for developments within the city limits.
MUNICIPAL COSTS OF ANNEXATION:
In addition to analyzing the conditions of the currently developing portion of Stone Canyon, the
staff has examined the departmental costs that annexation of the development would bring.
These costs include capital costs of constructing facilities and purchasing equipment, as well as
costs associated with acquiring new personnel and providing annual maintenance for the area.
This does not mean that all facilities, equipment, and personnel have to be accounted for
immediately; since the area will likely take several years to develop, some of the City's costs
would be able to be delayed until such time as new density and population demand.
These cost estimates are based on projections of 750 dwellings (a population of 2,000) within the
incorporated limits of Stone Canyon, and an overall population of up to 10,000 for the entire
Stone Canyon development, including that portion that will not be within the Owasso city limits.
PUBLIC WORKS COSTS
The largest apparent cost of annexation for the Public Works Department is the price of
extending a sanitary sewerline to Stone Canyon. The total up -front obligation for the line is
estimated at $5.158 million. While that money will be eligible for pay -back to the City as the
area in and around Stone Canyon develops, the payback is likely to occur slowly over time,
conditioned by the health of the market.
The other major capital cost to be borne in the Public Works Department would be the purchase
of a new refuse collection vehicle to serve the annexed area - $250,000.
Three new personnel would be required by the Public Works Department — one each for the
Refuse Collection Division, Wastewater Collection Division, and Stormwater Maintenance
Division. The annual cost of these personnel is estimated at $150,000.
Also, the staff estimates that $20,000 would be required for the periodic maintenance, upkeep,
and repair of infrastructure such as sanitary sewerlines, stormwater drainage systems, and streets.
The one -time costs listed above total $5.408 million, and the total annual Public Works costs are
estimated at $170,000.
POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
Based on an estimated population of two thousand residents, the staff would recommend four
patrol officers and one detective be added to the authorized sworn police force. Adding four
officers would add one officer to one of the four shifts, allowing more officers to be available
around the clock to serve the extended area. The initial cost of hiring five personnel with
equipment (such as patrol vehicles) would be approximately $490,000, with an estimated annual
salary and maintenance cost in following years of $365,000.
The one -time Police Department costs total $125,000, and the total annual Police Department
costs are estimated at $365,000.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
In order to maintain current municipal ISO ratings levels, the location and size of the Stone
Canyon development compels the staff to consider the prospect of constructing and staffing a
new fire station to serve the Stone Canyon vicinity. The cost estimate for the fire station (which
is envisioned to include a Police substation) is $2.3 million. Twelve firefighters would be
required to fully staff the new station, with an estimated annual cost of $762,000. Two new
vehicles, one fire engine and one ambulance, would be necessary to serve the new station, at a
cost of $650,000.
The one -time Fire Department costs total $2.95 million, and the total annual Fire Department
costs are estimated at $762,000.
7
SUMMARY OF TOTAL MUNICIPAL COST ESTIMATES
One Time Estimatf
Sanitary sewerline
Refuse vehicle
Police equipment
Fire station
Fire vehicles
;d Municipal Costs
$5.158 million
$250,000
$125,000
$2.3 million
$650,000
Total one time costs: $8,483,000
FINDINGS:
Annual Estimated Municipal Costs
Added Public Works personnel
$150,000
Annual infrastructure maintenance
$20,000
Added Police personnel
$365,000
Added Fire personnel
$762,000
Total annual costs:
$1 ,297,000
As noted above, there are several issues of concern related to the annexation of the northern two
square miles of the Stone Canyon development.
The fact that the territory remains within the Limestone Fire District means that the property
owners within Stone Canyon would be forced to pay taxes to the fire district for a fire protection
service that would be provided by the City of Owasso. Even if the territory is detached from the
district, the owners would pay ad valorem taxes until the debt currently incurred by the fire
district has been satisfied.
Most of the other concerning issues related to the Stone Canyon annexation revolve around the
condition of the three subdivisions currently under design and development. These three
subdivisions will not be on sanitary sewer systems. The stormwater drainage systems in these
areas appear to be under threat from silt infiltrating drains and culverts. The streets in the
subdivisions are not built to municipal standards. Finally, the fire hydrants proposed for the
subdivisions are inadequate for providing a municipal level of fire protection.
As a result of these infrastructure conditions, it is likely that the life of the infrastructure will be
significantly less than the life of the infrastructure had it been constructed to city standards. If
the City of Owasso chooses to annex these subdivisions, then an investment will be needed to
improve the condition of the infrastructure, likely within the next few years.
Of course, these concerns are balanced by the recognition that this area lies within the Owasso
fenceline. Because of its proximity to the development, the City of Owasso will likely be
compelled to annex the territory eventually. After all, the City of Owasso has been around for
more than 100 years and will be here 100 years from now. Similarly, this development will exist
in some form for the foreseeable future. It has been observed over time that property values in
developments outside the jurisdiction of municipal services such as public safety, public utilities,
and services such as refuse collection and code enforcement decline more rapidly than similar
developments lying within the jurisdiction of those same municipal services. This decline in
value will eventually have a detrimental impact on the values of adjacent properties that exist
within the city limits, causing the municipality to desire to annex the territory, improve the
conditions causing the drop in value, and thereby stabilize the values of incorporated properties.
Further, the residents of Stone Canyon will likely identify themselves as Owassans. They will be
included within the Owasso school district, zip code, telephone exchange, legislative districts,
and ambulance boundary. They will shop, work, eat, recreate, worship, and interact in the same
places as those who live within the city limits. Essentially, they will be us. It is important to
remember that, while the City of Owasso may not have a legal obligation to include the
development within Owasso's corporate boundaries, the City should not ignore or exclude those
who live in proximity from the municipality. Annexation is one of the most obvious and
appropriate ways to avoid such exclusion.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff is mindful that the three subdivisions currently under development within Stone
Canyon do not meet municipal standards, and that the remainder of the development has yet to
be constructed and improved. Therefore, the staff intends to recommend that the City of Owasso
annex the northern two sections of Stone Canyon with the exception of the boundaries of the
three subdivisions currently under construction, and that Stone Canyon PUD, as approved by
Rogers County, be accepted as the allowed land use distribution pattern for the annexation.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Map of area recommended to be annexed
2. Exhibit depicting Stone Canyon PUD
3. City Engineer's report dated January 15, 2008
I
rn
z
0
X
w
z
z
c
0
c
v
v
c
c
0
v
J
Q
H
z
W
0
U)
W
/
z
0
V)
s
m
D
Y
PROPOSED ANNEXATION I CITY OF OWASSO
08/26/08
Legend 111 N. Main Street
0 P.O. Box 180
Owasso, OK 74055
North
- "HIS ?vl,, .P IS FOR TN.FOR?�LA..TION� PURPOSE OiirLY A Fu IS I�OT Ii`STED Dk i? TO 918.376.1500
-MP "RESENT AN ACCUR.4TF ,kN-D TRUE SCALE. USE OF THIS 'MAY IS WITHOUT
OR REPRESH: TTFiTION BX CITX OF OWA.SSO OP ITS ACCUlk-AC.Y�-
Fit
�1,�
r
1111 �,► ,��.
mey
s
b► �►
o �0 ®®
f
P1 API
OWNS
Pr ILI
tia
ava
1
Development Ar- "t "
A.Wdor6 SAQWFOW.. 2868.87 ACM
PAWdu" hUll•Faidy, WW Acm
cmmwrdd MW Aar"
maing 4UM Aum
kd-MW 3081 Arne
MOW,Opww.- - AS Am*,
7&111 North
L—lir L4.p
MD NO.
F
EXHIBIT nBlo
ll'LJD CONCEPT ILLUSTRATION
GREENHILL PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
TANNER CONSULTING, L.L.C.
I'llt.SA, OKLA110MA
-W
CL
C
0
0
la
li
CA
mw
of
TO: ROGER STEVENS
INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ERIC WILES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JOE JOHN NURRE, P.E.
CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA
COMPARISON — STONE CANYON DEVELOPMENT (ROGERS
COUNTY) VS. CITY OF OWASSO
DATE: January 15, 2008
BACKGROUND:
Stone Canyon is Planned Unit Development located in all or portions of Sections 35 and 36 of
Township 21 North, Range 14 East, Sections 1 and 2 of Township 20 North, Range 14 East and
Section 6, Township 20 North, Range 15 East in Rogers County. This area is generally bounded
by 76th Street North on the north, 193 East Avenue on the east, 46th Street North on the south
and 161St East Avenue on the west. Sections 35 and 36 are within the City of Owasso fenceline;
but are not within the incorporated limits. When completed, Stone Canyon will contain areas of
single - family residential (2,616 acres), multi - family residential (60 acres), commercial (90 acres),
mining (458 acres) and industrial (36 acres) development — in all, nearly 3,300 acres.
Construction of the first two residential phases of Stone Canyon, as well as perimeter fencing
and other site amenities, began in July 2007. Planning and design of the third residential phase
is currently underway. The design_ and construction of these phases was performed under the
provisions of a PUD initially approved by the Rogers County Planning Commission on October
6, 2005 and by the Rogers County Board of Commissioners on October 17, 2005. The Rogers
County Subdivision Regulations and the Roadway, Drainage and Detention Addendum
(September 2005) to these regulations served as governing specifications.
Subsequently, the developers of Stone Canyon requested the City of Owasso to consider the
annexation of the two sections of the development within the City's fenceline (Sections 35 and
36). This annexation would result in the incorporation of 1280 acres of constructed or proposed
development and associated infrastructure the design of which is based on criteria which differ
from the City of Owasso Engineering Design Criteria, Construction Standards and Standard
Drawings.
This memorandum is intended to compare and contrast the design and construction standards
for Stone Canyon public infrastructure as it is presently being developed with current City of
Owasso design and construction standards and to consider some of the implications of the
differences and similarities.
Documents consulted in the preparation of this memorandum include City of Owasso
Engineering Design Criteria, Construction Standards and Standard Drawings; City of Owasso
Subdivision Regulations; Rogers County Subdivision Regulations; Stone Canyon Lift Station
Report (Preliminary Draft, August 2007 — prepared by Kellogg Engineering, Inc.); Construction
Plans for The Lakes at Stone Canyon (October 2006 — prepared by Kellogg Engineering Inc.);
Hydrology Study & Engineering Report — The Lakes at Stone Canyon Phase I (October 2006 —
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 2 of 10
prepared by Kellogg Engineering Inc.); Water Plan — The Lakes at Stone Canyon — Phase I
(Kellogg Engineering Inc. — May 2007); Stone Canyon PUD (Final Version — January 2006;
Approved — October 2005) and the Stone Canyon website (www.stonecanvon living. com).
LAND SUBDIVISION:
Lot sizes for the two subdivisions provided for review (Settler's Creek and Tanglewood) meet or
exceed City of Owasso bulk and area requirements for RE (Residential Estate) zoning. Lot sizes
in Settler's Creek range between 0.77 acres and 1.31 acres. Average lot size is 0.96 acres. Lot
sizes in Tanglewood range between 0.79 acres and 1.49 acres. Average lot size is 1.03 acres.
A 35' front yard building line is maintained on all lots; no rear yard set backs are indicated. A
minimum 10' drainage easement is provided along both side lot lines of every lot. Rear yard
utility easements correspond to City of Owasso practice. Perimeter easements are 17.5';
adjoining lot easements are 11'.
Some attention to topography should be addressed in the consideration of possible annexation
of portions of Stone Canyon. Subdivision boundaries and collector streets do not necessarily
follow section line boundaries. For example, although the majority of the Tanglewood
development is situated in Section 36, T21 N, R1 4E, some portions extend into Section 1, T20N,
R14E and Section 6, T20N, R15E. Other portions of the conceptual plan which are mostly
situated in Sections 35 and 36 also extend into other sections further to the south. Some
attention should be directed to annexation boundaries in order to eliminate the possibility of
inconsistent jurisdiction in adjacent properties.
STORMWATER SYSTEMS:
Stone Canyon /Rogers County
1. Minor culvert design by Rational Method
2. Major culvert design by NRCS method
3. Minor ditch (roadway side - drains) velocities
range between 1.2 and 2.6
feet per second
4. Allows overland flow across more than two
lots
5. Allows swale (borrow) ditches to carry runoff
City of Owasso Criteria
Rational Method accepted by City of Owasso
criteria
NRCS method recommended by Owasso
criteria for this application
Minimum ditch velocity — 2.5 feet per second
to avoid sedimentation; maximum ditch
velocity — 6.0 feet per second to prevent
erosion
Restricts overland flow across no more than 2
lots
Requires curbs, gutters, inlets and pipe
along streets
6. Minimum ditch slope — 0.6%
7. Major channel geometry — 16.0' bottom
width /2:1 side slopes (with erosion protection)
8. Minor channel geometry corresponds with
City of Owasso standards — no pilot channel
provided
9. No engineered Phase I detention
10. Allows 12" driveway culverts
11. Acceptable driveway culvert materials
include:
Smooth steel
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Corrugated metal pipe (CGMP)
High density polyethylene (HDPE)
(HDPE may only be used if driveway is 6"
concrete or thicker)
- indicated plan dimensions are for smooth -wall
pipe; culverts must be 6" larger diameter pipe
for CGMP
12. Acceptable roadway culvert materials
include:
Smooth steel
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Reinforced concrete box (RCB)
Corrugated metal pipe (CGMP)
HDPE (with 24" cover or greater)
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 3 of 10
conduits — roadside channels must comply
with criteria for all other open channels
Minimum ditch slope — 0.2%
Owasso major channel criteria geometry
includes 4.0' minimum bottom width /3.5:1 side
slopes (without erosion protection)
Roadside ditches must comply with open
channel criteria — paved bottom (pilot channel)
required to provide hard surface flow line for
cleaning and maintenance
Requires stormwater detention to be
engineered and constructed in first phase
Minimum driveway culvert is 15" (w/
recommended change to 18 ")
Acceptable driveway culvert materials include:
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
- HDPE and CGMP are specifically excluded
Acceptable roadway culvert materials include:
Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Reinforced concrete box (RCB)
The Hydrology Study for The Lakes at Stone Canyon (Phase 1) uses SCS Unit Hydrograph
methodology for developing a stormwater runoff analysis for the project. This methodology is
preferred in the City of Owasso, particularly for drainage basins larger than 60 acres. Although
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 4 of 10
the preferred methodology has been used for this report, its specific implementation would likely
not have been approved by initial Public Works review. The report is able to take advantage of
the small project area relative to the large watershed it is associated with to show no adverse
effects on downstream property and no need for temporary or permanent detention.
This should in no way imply a criticism of the report — it reflects an analysis performed during
the early stages of a particularly large development without reference to other portions of the
conceptual plan. Both the Stone Canyon PUD and this report reference a primary on -site
detention pond /lake with a surface area in excess of 60 acres as part of the conceptual plan.
The report best serves to point out the need for a comprehensive drainage master plan for the
development which would reflect the multiple land uses and relative sizes of the development
areas.
Because design features such as open side ditches without curbs, gutters, and inlets do not
reflect the typical urban environment, no provision for their construction is included in the City of
Owasso Engineering Design Criteria. These features may, however, be appropriate for the sort
large acreage, estate lots proposed for Stone Canyon. If these improvements are designed
using sound engineering practice to provide efficient stormwater conveyance through the
development and ease of maintenance over their design life, there is no reason not to allow
their use in selected, large -lot areas in Stone Canyon.
The reduction in flow area over time in both open ditches and culverts by silt deposits is the
single biggest argument against the use of these features in an urban environment. Secondarily,
they use a large portion of the right -of -way and reduce or eliminate the ability to serve
pedestrian needs with sidewalks.
To address these concerns, we recommend:
➢ Driveway culverts should be oversized 6" larger than the minimum diameter indicated by
the hydraulic analysis. This would considerably extend the design life of the system prior
to maintenance activities such as culvert cleaning and ditch shaping and restoration.
➢ Initial hydraulic design should provide for ditch velocities of no less than 2.5 feet per
second. An advantage of large estate lots is the reduction of total stormwater runoff
because of the relatively small ratio of impervious area to overall lot size. However, this
reduction may result in slower runoff velocities, which lead to greater amounts of silt in
ditches and pipes. Sufficient velocity to clear the ditch "naturally" should be provided for
in the design.
➢ Open side ditches should be constructed with a small concrete pilot channel or trickle
channel at the flowline between culverts and other structures. While this would represent
an additional increment of initial work (and cost) during construction, it would greatly
facilitate ditch maintenance and reduce ditch erosion over the design life.
➢ Sidewalks are problematical for this sort of construction. Unless a sidewalk easement is
provided for on the property side of the drainage ditch back - slope, no area is available
within the right -of -way for construction of these features.
STREETS;
Stone Canyon /Ropers County
1. Typical section indicates 50' right -of -way
with 5' D /E, U/E each side
2. Typical section street width shown as 24' -
Rogers County subdivision regulations require
curb and gutter "inside municipal jurisdiction"
3. Sub -base compacted to 95% of Standard
Density. No requirements for modifications for
plastic soils (PI >10).
4. Typical section indicates 6" of 1 -1/2"
compacted aggregate (no gradation
specification) as roadway base
5. Typical section indicates asphalt surface
course to be depth required by Rogers County
specifications - no depth indicated on drawings.
6. Street names by plat
7. No apparent requirement for sidewalks
8. Dedicated cross -walks may be required for
blocks exceeding 1,200 feet.
9. Cul -de -sac right -of -way radius - 60';
pavement radius - 45'
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 5 of 10
City of Owasso Criteria
Typical section indicates 50' right -of -way.
Roadway, sidewalk and utilities all contained
within this dimension.
Typical section street width is 26' face- of -curb
to face -of -curb.
Sub -base compacted to 95% of Standard
Density. Sub -base modified with lime or flyash
for plastic soils (10I >10).
Typical section requires 8" of ODOT Type "A"
aggregate as roadway base (or treated and
compacted sub -base as above).
Typical section requires 6 -1/2" of asphalt (6"
of concrete) for roadway surface course.
Street names to follow Tulsa County system
Sidewalks required
Dedicated cross -walks may be required for
blocks exceeding 800 feet.
Cul -de -sac right -of -way radius - 55'; pavement
radius - 45'
A visual inspection of the constructed pavement at "The Lakes at Stone Canyon" (Settler's
Creek and Tanglewood subdivisions) indicates considerable (and inconsistent) deviation from
the construction drawings provided to Public Works for review. Some deviation in width is to be
expected for asphalt roads without curb and gutter and the constructed product is within an
acceptable range for this dimension (no less than 24'; no greater than 25). However, depth of
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 6 of 10
the roadway courses varies considerably. No sub -base was available for inspection; but
aggregate base appeared to meet or exceed the required dimensions. Most aggregate base for
residential sections was no less than 8" thick and predominately as much as 10" thick. Base for
residential collectors was as much as 12" thick. Thickness of the asphalt surface course was as
little as 1 -1/2" thick and as great as 4 -1/2" thick. The design engineer has informed Public
Works that the intended asphalt thickness for the constructed surface course is 3 ". Public
Works has scheduled pavement borings and sub - surface investigations at 10 locations
throughout the development to provide more accurate measurements of the constructed
dimensions.
Although the plan version of the typical section provides for 2' shoulders as part of the
construction, these shoulders were not observed on the completed portions of the pavement. It
is extremely important — particularly in fill sections — that these shoulders and the associated
side -ditch foreslopes be carefully constructed and compacted. These features provide lateral
support to the paving section and prevent migration of the base from beneath the surface
course. Failure to exercise diligence in this construction will result in limited paving life,
particularly at the pavement edge.
The City of Owasso has determined, through experience, that 6 -1/2" of asphalt surface course
represents a minimum dimension for streets in an urban environment. Not only must these
streets meet the needs of local traffic, but they must also regularly carry the heavier loads of
school buses and refuse collection vehicles. Although the extensive use of aggregate base at
Stone Canyon goes far in producing a typical section equivalent to (or better than) the standard
Owasso section, it must be combined with a surface course which meets the needs of urban
traffic. Public Works is prepared to consider deviations from the standard section provided they
are prepared by a licensed professional engineer and are based on realistic estimates of current
and projected traffic loads.
SANITARY SEWER:
Proposed initial phases of Stone Canyon — currently either in design or under construction -
include:
Settler's Creek 71 Acres 48 Lots
Tanglewood 93 Acres 74 Lots
Lakes at Stone Canyon — Ph III 88 Acres 52 Lots
These first phases are intended to have private, individual, aerobic sewer treatment systems.
These systems are small process units designed to digest organic matter and settleable solids
in an oxygenated environment to produce a clarified liquid which is applied to the ground
surface by sprinkler jets. The units represent a relatively new technology for providing sanitary
sewer treatment for low population density areas for which the cost of conventional gravity
sewers would be prohibitive. The design, construction and maintenance of these units are
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison - Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 7 of 10
governed by the requirements of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Individual
and Small Public On -site Sewage Treatment Systems.
The City of Owasso requires all developments within the municipal jurisdiction to connect to its
sanitary sewer collection system. While there are likely some isolated homes or areas in the city
still served by septic systems as a result of a relic condition prior to annexation, no provisions
for private, individual treatment systems, either aerobic or septic, are included in the
Engineering Design Criteria and Construction Standards. However, the criteria allow sufficient
latitude on the part of the Public Works Director to permit systems such as these by special
exemption.
The area of Stone Canyon more or less south of 66th Street North is topographically challenged
for the extension of a gravity sanitary sewer collection system. The design engineer has
proposed, as part of the Stone Canyon Lift Station Report, that this area of the development
also be served by individual treatment systems. This area consists of 1316 gross acres, of
which 785 acres are indicated as available for development. The most recent conceptual plan
shows 539 lots in this area which is consistent with the lot size and density established for the
Lakes at Stone Canyon.
After deducting the areas reserved for private treatment systems as well as the areas reserved
by the PUD for mining and industrial land uses, the remainder of the development more or less
north of 66th Street North is potentially available to be served by sanitary sewer provided by the
City of Owasso. This area consists of 1198 gross acres. Several potential land uses are
indicated by both the recent conceptual plan and the lift station report including:
➢ Single family homes
➢ Patio homes
➢ Park homes
➢ Garden villas
➢ Commercial development
➢ School site
➢ Church sites
➢ Park land
➢ Sports facilities and playing fields
➢ 80 acre lake
The developer has indicated in the PUD document the need for significant flexibility in creating
land use areas to create a quality development consistent with marketplace demands. While
this flexibility is a necessity, given the extent of the development, it makes infrastructure
planning somewhat problematical. Stipulations and agreements associated with the land
transactions with the prior owner's require definite amounts of open space and general use
property. It is likely that these agreements will limit the density in this area.
After deducting the areas reserved for such use, including park land, sports facilities and the 80
acre lake, the lift station report states that 890 net acres are available for development. Without
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison - Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 8 of 10
reference to any particular or definite land use and development plan, the report stipulates a
load on the collection system equivalent to the load generated by 1000 single family homes.
This proposed load could potentially be generated by any possible combination of the remaining
land uses indicated. Without the benefit of more specific development plans, it represents a
reasonable estimate of likely sewer demand.
When investigating the feasibility of extending an interceptor sewer along a 76th Street North
alignment, Public Works considered the possibility of opening other areas of the basin for
potential development. While these areas are not as extensive as the Stone Canyon
development and have already experienced some development, they represent additional
potential for both commercial and residential development. In all, approximately 1563 gross
acres or 1094 net acres are available for sanitary sewer service in areas north of 76th Street
North, east of 193rd East Avenue and south of 76th Street North in Section 34. Based on the
same ratio of load to area developed for the northern portions of Stone Canyon (1.12 lots /acre),
this area has the potential to generate the equivalent load of 1229 lots (of which between 350
and 375 are already developed).
The City's wastewater systems consultant, Greeley & Hansen, has developed a conceptual
estimate for a proposed gravity interceptor sewer to serve the 76th Street North corridor. An 18"
gravity sewer along a 76th Street North alignment from a connection to the Elm Creek
Interceptor to the 76th Street North and 161St East Avenue intersection (approximately 1.5 miles)
has an estimated construction cost (for planning purposes) of $2,378,000. A 10" sewer
extending an additional 0.67 miles east from 161St East Avenue has an estimated construction
cost of $665,000. Total project costs are $3.1 million.
Combining possible project costs with proposed service units in both Stone Canyon and the
adjacent portions of the basin develops a potential payback cost of $1400 per service unit or
service connection.
Wastewater collection and treatment system improvements downstream of this development
insure that the City of Owasso has the capacity to convey and treat the anticipated increase in
flow. Based on 2005 Wastewater Master Plan recommendations, design work is currently
underway to increase treatment plant capacity from 3.3 MGD (average) to 4.5 MGD and 4.5
MGD (peak) to 6.2 MGD. Additional improvements include renovation of the 117th Street Lift
Station to increase capacity to 10 MGD. Construction of these improvements is anticipated to be
completed by Fall/Winter 2009. Funding is by low interest Clean Water State Revolving Fund
loans.
Subsequent to completing these improvements, the Elm Creek Interceptor becomes a limit to
capacity. The Wastewater Master Plan anticipates this need and recommends replacement (or
augmentation) of the lower end of this line in FY 2010 -2011 to provide the equivalent of 42" of
pipe diameter. Projected costs are $1.45 million.
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 9of10
WATER:
Domestic water supply for the Stone Canyon development is provided by Roger County Rural
Water District No, 3. All engineering design and construction is governed by Rogers County
Rural Water District #3 Standard Details and Specifications. The City of Owasso has been
fortunate to enjoy a good working relationship with the water district, particularly in urban areas
where the jurisdiction of the two entities overlaps. Engineering and construction criteria for both
entities are similar (or identical) and both must meet or exceed the requirements of the
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Public Water Supply Construction Standards.
Public Works was able to review water plans provided by Kellogg Engineering for the two sub-
divisions — Settler's Creek and Tanglewood — currently under construction at Stone Canyon. As
designed, this system is consistent with City of Owasso criteria including pipe sizes and
material, sleeved crossings and suitable backfill material under streets. The system is internally
looped with no dead -end lines and has effective provisions for connections to future phases.
However, the proposed design differs from City of Owasso criteria in three important areas:
➢ All cul -de -sacs shown in the plans are served by 2" lines. While this is not accepted
practice in the City of Owasso, it is common practice in the rural water districts.
Acceptance of this design relies on an interpretation of ODEQ requirements. The Public
Water Supply Construction Standards require a minimum main size of 6" in diameter for
all systems providing fire protection. This is often construed to mean that any line that
serves a fire hydrant must be 6" or larger; but that lines providing domestic service only
may be smaller. In these systems, hydrants are provided at the cul -de -sac entrance; but
no closer. This could be a disadvantage in fighting a fire in a deep (greater than 300
feet) cul -de -sac.
➢ Depth of bury for the proposed water line is indicated by plan note as 36 ". This
requirement is identical to City of Owasso specifications and exceeds the ODEQ
requirement of 30 ". The requirement is intended to protect the main from freezing or
physical damage. However, when considering the Stone Canyon system, some
provision should be made for those occasions when the line intersects the open
drainage. Rogers County specifications require the roadway side - ditches to be 2 feet
(minimum) below the top of subgrade. Depending on the elevation of the existing soil
relative to the roadway at the time the water line was constructed, this installation could
leave as little as 12" of cover at the bottom of ditch. This condition could be easily
addressed by an additional plan note or special detail to govern construction.
➢ Hydrants shown on the water plans are indicated as two -way hydrants. These hydrants
are not sufficient for fire - protection purposes. Both City of Owasso criteria and ODEQ
Public Water Supply Construction Standards require three -way hydrants having a 4 -1/2
inch pumper outlet and two 2 -1/2 inch hose outlets for all systems providing fire
protection. ODEQ requires that hydrants be located and spaced in accordance with
American Insurance Association requirements. City of Owasso criteria require that
hydrant spacing and location be approved by the Fire Marshall. It is essential that all
features of the water supply system, including hydrants, hydrant location, line size and
Infrastructure Design And Construction Criteria
Comparison — Stone Canyon Development (Rogers
County) vs. City Of Owasso
Page 10 of 10
flow and demand capacity, meet or exceed the requirements of the International Fire
Code and the American Insurance Association.
4 I_
2
ZSIDEWALK
50'
26'
TYPICAL SECTION
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
90% STD. DENSITY.
`6" 4,000 PSI PORTLAND
CEMENT CONCRETE
I 1 I —
HALF SECTION
INTEGRAL CURB & PAVEMENT
4% (1/2" /ft.)
(TYP)
2% (1/4" /ft.)
(MAX.)
SAWED LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION
JOINT WITH DOWEL BARS, SEE STD. DETAIL STRT 14.
#6 x 18" SMOOTH
13' DOWELL BAR AT
24" C /C.
2% (1/4" /ft.) 2% (1/4" /ft.)
o �;' c='` o° ..o., ate° OV �o�c��{`,r,
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE AND
TO 95% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE BASE COMPACTED
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME 1' BEYOND BACK OF CURB,
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
CONCRETE STREET SECTION HALF SECT
COMPACT TO MINIMUM 4 1/2" ODOT TYPE
90% STD. DENSITY. "A" INSOLUBLE BASE
ION
SEPARATE PLACEMENTS
2" ODOT TYPE "B" INSOLUBLE SURFACE
6" CURB
13 13, / ;FF CTRT_n7
PRIME COAT TACK COAT (TY
�c 2 D D (1/4" /ft. )
o
_C'c L'' n00 r �i0 r:O0 r O`er', ]r-�-v ^;,0, �:`n0� pOv��v o Sf G
` CiC�C.
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE STREET SECTION
NOTES:
1. SECTIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
SUBGRADE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
THICKNESS OF MODIFICATION OR A SUBBASE
o DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHERE SEVERE SOIL
FL CONDITIONS EXIST.
H
2. FOR EXISTING SUBBASE MATERIAL WITH PI <10
ui
w SUBGRADE SHALL BE CLASSIFIED SELECT, INERT
w MATERIAL OR STABILIZED AND COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
/S' X UBGRADE AND
BASE COMPACTED
1'BEYOND
BACK OF CURB,
0 P.EVISIDN 6Y DATE RESIDENTIAL MINOR STREET
3. ASPHALT SURFACES SHALL CONFORM TO
a
w ODOT STANDARD 401.04 FOR TOLERANCES AND STANDARD DETAILS
STANDARD DETAIL STRT -08 FOR TEXTURE.
a CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
4. IF A COMPACTED AGGREGATE SUBBASE IS USED, 77
THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED ON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
cn SEPARATOR FABRIC. ENGINEERING DIVISION
ogre 05/05 STANDAPDND
STRT -01
HALF SECTION
INTEGRAL CURB & PAVEMENT
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
90% STD. DENSITY,
NOTES
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
60'
1
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95°% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
SUBGRADE AND
a
SUBBASE COMPACTED
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
�
1 4'
36'
CONCRETE STREET SECTION
4' 1.
SEPARATE PLACEMENTS
N�PX
29%/. 1/4" /ft.
2% 1/4" /ft.
4.1
SIDEWALK
4 . ( /2"
((
2'%.(1/4" /ft.)
TYPICAL SECTION
(MAX.)
SAWED LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
6" 4,000 PSI PORTLAND
JOINT WITH DOWEL BARS, SEE
90% STD. DENSITY.
CEMENT CONCRETE
STANDARD DETAIL STR -14
18'
18'
#6 x 24" SMOOTH
DOWEL BAR AT
24" TO 30" C/C
2% (1/4" /ft.)
2% (1/4" ft)
nCr
. .C3�%��-v.:nOL'`�n,CL`nCs�%''
HALF SECTION
INTEGRAL CURB & PAVEMENT
COMPACT TO MINIMUM
90% STD. DENSITY,
NOTES
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE
8"
1
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95°% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
SUBGRADE AND
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME
SUBBASE COMPACTED
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2.
1' BEYOND
BACK OF CURB.
CONCRETE STREET SECTION
HALF SECTION
SEPARATE PLACEMENTS
2" ODOT TYPE "B" INSOLUBLE SURFACE
6" ODOT TYPE 6" CURB
"A" INSOLUBLE BASE SEE STRT -07
18' 18'
PRIME COAT TACK COAT (TYP)
2% (1/4" /ft.) 2/
(va^ ie.)
LS' 1 0r✓ p
,\� /
n ^T n ^ n C. r r . n C: f 'p •7 ° � O "'�(/ � JAS v, tii ^ \% ��
MINIMUM 8" ODOT TYPE "A" AGGREGATE 1'
BASE OR TREATED SUBBASE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD DENSITY, SUBGRADE
P.I. > 10 SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH LIME SUBGRADE AND
OR FLY ASH. SEE NOTE 2. SUBBASE COMPACTED
1'BEYOND
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE STREET SECTION BACK OF CURB.
0 1. SECTIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
SUBGRADE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
it THICKNESS OF MODIFICATION OR A SUBBASE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHERE SEVERE SOIL
U) CONDITIONS EXIST.
w2. FOR EXISTING SUBBASE MATERIAL WITH PI <10
SUBGRADE SHALL BE CLASSIFIED SELECT, INERT
MATERIAL OR STABILIZED AND COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
w 3. ASPHALT SURFACES SHALL CONFORM TO
o ODOT STANDARD 401.04 FOR TOLERANCES AND
STANDARD DETAIL STRT -08 FOR TEXTURE.
Q 4. IF A COMPACTED AGGREGATE SUBBASE IS USED,
0
Z THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED ON
SEPARATOR FABRIC. _
kEV1- a. °ATE RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREET
STANDARD DETAILS
CITY OF OWASSO, OKLAHOMA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
°ATE. 05/05 ST<.N°AP.p N°.
STRT -02
i
0
30' TOTAL WIDTH
25' R/W - 5' DIE & U/E
16' -D'
BARROW DITCH
BREMUDA MULCH SODDING
S�p4E� 3
4:1� �N
F09
"R
NOTE ROADWAY CONSMUC17ON SHALL BE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROGERS COUNTY
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE
OKLAHOM4 DEPARTMENT OF 1RANSPOR4TION
STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
SHOULDER
11' -D' I
12' -0'
DRMNG LANE
SURFACE COARSE AS PER
ROGERS COUNTY
12' -0'
DRMNG LANE
Slope 114' per R
BASE CD4RSE 6' THICK ---'
1 -112' AGG. EASE COMPACT SUBGR40E TO BE COMPACTED
TO 959 STD. PROCTOR DENSITY OR TO 959 STD. PROCTOR DENSITY
AS APPROVED BY ROGERS COUNTY
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION
N.T.S.
30' TOTAL WIDTH
15' R/W - 5' D/E & U/E
SHOULDER
2' -0" I 16' -0'
BARROW DITCH
W
BRD4UDA MULCH SODDING o
T SZo N
4;1 SLOP SLOPE
3.1 MAX.
NOTE ALL EARTH WORK SHALL BE
DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD
SPECIFKATTONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION.
ROGERS COUNTY ROADWAY SPECIFICATIONS.
1. RIGHT OF WAY. FIFTY (50) MINIMUM WIDTH, WITH ADDITIONAL 5' DIE & U/E EACH SIDE.
2. DRAINAGE PIPE: MINIMUM LENGTH OF FORTY (40) FEET
J. HEADWALLS: ALL DRAIN PIPE OR TILE WILL BE FURNISHED WITH A POURED IN PLACE
CONCRETE HEADWALL ON BOTH ENDS ACCORDING TO DATE SHEET SH 202 A.
4. COMPACTION: UPPER TWELVE (12) INCHES OF DIRT BASE OF THE ROAD SURFACE MUST
MEET 959' STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY TEST PERFORMED AND CERTIFIED.
5. ROAD SURFACE: DRIVING SURFACE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF TWENTY FOUR (24) FEET WIDE.
6. ROAD SURFACE MATERIAL: ROAD SURFACE SHALL BE CROWNED IN THE CENTER WITH
DRAINAGE TO BOTH SIDES AND BE A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6")
OF 1 -11Z AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND COMPACTED
TO 957. STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
7. SHOULDERS: TWO (2) FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ROAD SURFACE.
8. DRAINAGE AREA: ELEVEN (11) FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ROAD SURFACE OUTSIDE OF
SHOULDER REQUIREMENTS WITH MAXIMUM BACK SLOPE OF THREE (3)
TO ONE (1) BOTH SIDES.
9. CUL -DE -SAC: WHEREVER A TURN AROUND IS REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
A CIRCULAR TURN AROUND HAVING A MAXIMUM INSIDE RADIUS OF
FORTY FIVE (45) FEET AND A MINIMUM OUTSIDE RADIUS OF SIXTY
(60) FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED.
10. ALL CONSTRUC71ON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND DETENTION
ADDEDUM TO SUBDIVISION REGULA7ONS DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 2005.
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DESIGN:
A. ROADWAYS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM DITCH OF TWO FEET IN DEPTH AND
TO BE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF SUB -GRADE NOT THE TOP OF PAVEMENT.
B. BORROW DITCHES DESIGN AS FOLLOWS:
1. 4:1 MINIMUM FORE -SLOPE AND BACK- SLOPE.
2. BACKFILLED WITH 4" MIN. TOPSOIL AND SEEDED.
3. SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN A ADDITIONAL 5' DIE & U/E
C. ALL ROADWAY CULVERTS AND STORM DRAINS SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: SMOOTH STEEL
PIPE, RCP, RCB, CGMP, AND HDPE. HDPE CULVERTS MAY BE USED IF THERE IS AT LEAST
24- INCHES OF COVER. ALL CULVERTS SHALL HAVE ODOT STANDARD SLOPED CONCRETE END
SECTIONS OR ODOT STANDARD HEADWALLS. ALL ROADWAY CULVERTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 15"
IN DIAMETER.
D. A STORM WATER POLLU77ON PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE COUNTY
ALONG WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS IN ACCORDANCE THE CURRENT ODEQ RULES AND REGULATIONS
REGARDING STORM WATER DISCHARGE.
E. HYDRAULIC GRADE LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ALL STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION PLANS,
F. ALL DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH ONE FOOT (1) OF FREEBOARD DURING A
500 -YEAR STORM EVENT.
G. DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL CONSIST OF SMOOTH STEEL PIPES, REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
(RCP), OR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CGMP). DRIVEWAY CULVERTS MAY BE HDPE ONLY IF THE
DRIVEWAY IS CONCRETE AND AT LEAST SIX INCHES (6 ") THICK. ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL
HAVE ODOT STANDARD SLOPED CONCRETE END SECTIONS ANY OTHER TYPE MUST BE APPROVED
BY THE COUNTY
ALL CULVERT SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE THE ROGERS COUNTY STANDARDS.
H. SUB -BASE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" COMPACTED 1 -112" AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL.