HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993.04.06_OPWA AgendaNOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
The Owasso Public Works Authority will meet in regular session on Tuesday, April 6, 1993 at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar,
Owasso, Oklahoma.
Notice filed in the office of the City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 4:00
p.m. on Friday, April 2, 1993.
64
Mar'64 Boutwell, City Clerk
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Flag Salute
3. Roll Call
4. Request Approval of the Minutes of March 16, 1993 Regular Meeting and March 23,
1993 Special Meeting
Attachment #4
5. Request Approval of Claims
Attachment #5
Owasso Public Works Authority
April 6, 1993
Page 3
11. Adjournment
LJI
11
' OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
' Tuesday, March 16, 1993
The Owasso Public Works Authority met in regular session on Tuesday, March 16, 1993 in the
Council Chambers at the Owasso Community Center per the Notice of Public Meeting and
Agenda posted on the City Hall bulletin board at 4 :00 p.m. on Friday, March 12, 1993.
' ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
IChairperson Marlar called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ITEM 2: FLAG SALUTE
IThe flag salute was held during the City Council meeting preceding this meeting.
8
1
ITEM 3: ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Patricia Marlar, Chairperson
John Phillips, Trustee
Bob Randolph, Trustee
Jim Smalley, Trustee
STAFF
ABSENT
Jason Gittelman, Vice Chairperson
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
Ronald D Cates, Authority Attorney
Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
A quorum was declared present.
ITEM 4: REOUEST APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 2, 1993 REGULAR
MEETING
Jim Smalley moved to approve the minutes as written, by reference hereto; seconded by John
Phillips.
AYE: Smalley, Phillips, Randolph, Marlar
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 5: REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE CLAIMS
tJim Smalley moved, seconded by John Phillips, to approve the following claims as submitted:
(1) $324,274.97, which included $193,060.00 Interfund Transfers, and (2) Payroll $18,269.70.
Owasso Public Works Authority
AYE: Smalley, Phillips, Randolph, Marlar
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 6: REPORT FROM OPWA MANAGER
No report.
ITEM 7: REPORT FROM OPWA ATTORNEY
No report.
ITEM 8: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
ITEM 9: NEW BUSINESS
None
ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT
Bob Randolph moved, seconded by Jim Smalley to adjourn.
AYE: Randolph, Smalley, Phillips, Marlar
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m.
Marcia Boutwell, Secretary
2
March 16, 1993
Patricia K Marlar, Chairperson
' OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
' Tuesday, March 23, 1993
Pursuant to the legal notice as is required by the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, including the
posting of notice and agenda on the City Hall bulletin board at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, March 19,
1993, as is required by the terms thereof, the Trustees of the Owasso Public Works Authority
of the City of Owasso, Oklahoma met in special session on Tuesday, March 23, 1993 at 6:30
p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Owasso Community Center.
ITEM l: CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Marlar called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m.
' ITEM 2: FLAG SALUTE
The flag salute was not held.
ITEM 3: ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Patricia Marlar, Chairperson Jason Gittelman, Vice Chairperson
John Phillips, Trustee Jim Smalley, Trustee
Bob Randolph, Trustee
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
Ronald D Cates, Authority Attorney
N Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
There was not the required 3/4 membership present to conduct the business as posted; therefore
Bob Randolph moved to recess the meeting and reconvene at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March
■ 24, 1993. Motion was seconded by John Phillips
AYE: Randolph, Phillips, Marlar
NAY: None
The motion carried 3 -0 and the meeting was recessed at 6:51 p.m.
Chairperson Marlar reconvened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 24, 1993 and
asked for a roll call.
' PRESENT ABSENT
Patricia Marlar, Chairperson Jason Gittelman, Vice Chairperson
John Phillips, Trustee
Bob Randolph, Trustee
' Jim Smalley, Trustee
Owasso Public Works Authority
STAFF
Rodney J Ray, City Manager
Ronald D Cates, Authority Attorney
Marcia Boutwell, Authority Secretary
A quorum was declared present.
March 23, 1993
ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATING TO
RESOLUTION #93 -01. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TWO LOANS
FROM THE OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD WITH A
COMBINED TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $4.600.000: APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TWO PROMISSORY
NOTES IN THE COMBINED TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $4.600.000 SECURED BY A PLEDGE OF REVENUES
AND AUTHORIZING THEIR EXECUTION: APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF TWO LOAN AGREEMENTS
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL
BOND OR NOTE INDENTURES: APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A SECURITY AGREEMENT, THE
AUTHORITY'S REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY
THE AUTHORITY IN CALENDAR YEAR 1993• RATIFYING A LEASE:
APPROVING VARIOUS COVENANTS: APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
PAYMENT OF FEES AND EXPENSES: AND CONTAINING OTHER
PROVISIONS RELATING THERETO.
Mr Ray presented this item. On November 17, 1992 the Oklahoma Water Resources Board
approved the OPWA application for the wastewater treatment facility project, the wastewater
collection system project, and cast iron pipe water system project. A maximum of $6,100,000
was approved. Revenues generated from the recent rate increase will service a $5,400,000 debt.
Because of requirements relating to arbitrage, the Water Resources Board has agreed to closing
on $4,600,000 of the approved debt limit now and the remaining $800,000 after January 1,
1994. Interest will be fixed on all money after closing on the remainder of the funds early in
1994 with a State Revolving Fund loan at 0% interest on 40% of the total construction cost of
the wastewater system projects and a fixed rate OWRB loan on 60% of the construction cost
of the wastewater projects and 100% of the construction cost of the water system project. The
effective interest rate is 5.752.
Bob Randolph moved to approve Resolution #93 -01, a resolution authorizing two loans from the
Oklahoma Water Resources Board with a combined total aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $4,600,000; approving the issuance of two promissory notes in the combined total
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,600,000 secured by a pledge of revenues and
authorizing their execution; approving and authorizing the execution of two loan agreements;
approving and authorizing the execution of supplemental bond or note indentures; approving and
authorizing the execution of a security agreement; establishing the Authority's reasonable
2
Owasso Public Works Authority March 23, 1993
expectations with respect to the total amount of tax exempt obligations to be issued by the
Authority in calendar year 1993; ratifying a lease; approving various covenants; approving and
authorizing payment of fees and expenses; and containing other provisions relating thereto.
Motion was seconded by John Phillips.
AYE: Randolph, Phillips, Smalley, Marlar
NAY: None
Motion carried 4 -0.
ITEM 5: ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Chairperson adjourned the meeting at 6:18 p.m.
Marcia Boutwell, Secretary
3
Patricia K Marlar, Chairperson
CITY OF OWASSO
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
4/02/93 12:25:10 A/P CLAIMS REPORT APAPVR PAGE:
PO # VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
--- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
* NO DEPARTMENT MASTER FOUND
------------------------ - - - - --
931883 CITY - AMBULANCE FUND AMBULANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS 8,353.73
931931 WILDWOOD APTS. OVER PAY ON ACCTS 2,301.73
931991 OPWA RECYCLE CENTER REIMS CASH DRAWER 1,400.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL =___> 12,055.46
OPWA ADMINISTRATION
------------------------ - - - - --
930024 CPS BUSINESS, INC.
930292 MEMBER SERVICE LIFE
931879 LIBERTY TULSA
931939 SUBURBAN OFFICE SUPPLY
931989 TREASURER PETTY CASH
932006 HI -TECH
DEPARTMENT TOTAL = = = =>
WATER
------------------------ - - - - --
931803 BOBBY TAYLOR
931804 OSCAR MCLAURIN
931805 ROBERT M BUCKLES
931818 JON GREENE
931963 CINTAS CORP.
931999 CITY GARAGE
932000 CITY GARAGE
932030 CITY UTILITY SERVICE
932031 PSO
932033 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
932034 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
DEPARTMENT TOTAL = = = =>
WASTEWATER
------------------------ - - - - --
LIC & ASSIST FEE
MONTHLY FEES
88 REVENUE BONDS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REIMS PETTY CASH
TONER
METER READER
METER READER
METER READER
METER READER
UNIFORM RENTAL
FUEL
PARTS
2/93 USE
2/93 USE
2/93 PLEXAR
2/93 NON - PLEXAR
931817 RETHERFORD PUBLICATIONS LEGAL NOTICE
931843 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OKLA SLUDGE DISPOSAL
931895 WAYEST SAFETY, INC. EQUIPMENT
931896 BARCO EQUIPMENT
931959 RON -VIK, INC. MAINT. SUPPLIES
217.00
33.00
48,490.00
32.20
53.34
90.00
48,915.54
351.90
217.35
317.70
106.65
96.20
200.69
48.63
55,090.69
162.84
27.22
63.96
56,683.83
48.24
75.60
1,243.50
2,078.00
100.87
13
CITY OF OWASSO
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
4/02/93 12:25:10 A/P CLAIMS REPORT
PO # VENDOR DESCRIPTION
---- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- -------------- - - - - --
931960 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFI SUPPLIES
931961
ADVANCED CHEMICAL
GAS CHLORINE
931962
UAL -MART
CLEANING SUPPLIES
931963
CINTAS CORP.
UNIFORM RENTAL
931989
TREASURER PETTY CASH
REIMB PETTY CASH
931999
CITY GARAGE
FUEL
932000
CITY GARAGE
PARTS
932031
PSO
2/93 USE
932032
LDCC INC -AT &T
2/93 USE
932033
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
2/93 PLEXAR
932034
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
2/93 NON - PLEXAR
932035
OKLA NATURAL GAS
2/93 USE
DEPARTMENT TOTAL = = = =>
REFUSE COLLECTIONS
------------------------ - - - - --
931600
KIMBALL ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
931755
WILLIAMS REFUSE EQUIPMENT
RED POLY -KARTS
931809
CINTAS CORP.
CLEANING /RENTAL
931810
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OKLA
TIPPING FEES
931900
KIMBALL ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
931946
HANES SHOE & ARCH SHOP
STEEL TOE BOOTS
931999
CITY GARAGE
FUEL
932000
CITY GARAGE
PARTS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL = = = =>
RECYCLE CENTER
------------------------ - - - - --
931600 KIMBALL ACE HARDWARE
931809 CINTAS CORP.
931810 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OKLA
931988 COMPUADD
931999 CITY GARAGE
932031 PSO
932033 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
DEPARTMENT TOTAL = = = =>
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
----------------- - - - - --
SUPPLIES
CLEANING /RENTAL
TIPPING FEES
COMPUTER REPAIR
FUEL
2/93 USE
2/93 PLEXAR
APAPVR PAGE: 14
AMOUNT
337.18
252.81
161.78
259.15
43.20
111.85
597.15
5,326.08
4.91
45.04
199.04
436.55
11,320.95
45.33
6,100.00
149.75
3,205.70
35.51
101.00
394.75
229.64
10,261.68
43.95
35.50
125.29
43.65
31.05
215.67
22.22
517.33
931887 CITY - GENERAL FUND MONTHLY TRANSFER 22,916.00
CITY OF OWASSO
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
4/02/93 12:25:10 A/P CLAIMS REPORT
PO # VENDOR DESCRIPTION
---- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- --------------- --
931888 CITY - WORKERS' COMP SELF I MONTHLY TRANSFER
931889 CITY GARAGE TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL = = = =>
APAPVR PAGE:
AMOUNT
-- ------- - - - - --
3,842.50
5,125.00
31,883.50
171,638.29
15
CITY OF OWASSO
CITY GARAGE
4/02/93 12:25:10 A/P CLAIMS REPORT APAPVR PAGE: 16
PO # VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
---- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
CITY GARAGE
-------------------- - - - - --
931430
OWASSO AUTO SUPPLY
PARTS
260.47
931589
TULSA BRAKE AND CLUTCH
PARTS
348.94
931590
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM
PARTS
83.90
931599
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
2,781.04
931600
KIMBALL ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
88.38
931736
WELSCO INC
TANK RENTAL
33.20
931775
WELDON OF TULSA, INC.
SUPPLIES
44.50
931778
BOWERS OIL CO.
FUEL
5,304.60
931795
STAN'S WESTSIDE AUTO ELEC
PARTS
34.95
931797
PENNANT PETROLEUM CO.
OIL /GREASE
542.30
931798
MILEAGE MASTERS
PARTS
106.08
931800
DALE & LEE SERVICE
REPAIRS
153.96
931801
7EP MANUFACTURING CO.
SUPPLIES
127.09
931806
WELDON OF TULSA, INC.
PARTS
68.78
931809
CINTAS CORP.
CLEANING /RENTAL
328.82
931857
LESTER'S GEAR & PARTS
PARTS
155.66
931900
KIMBALL ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
60.59
931901
STANDARD AUTO SUPPLY
PARTS
174.46
931945
ACCURATE FIRE EQUIPMENT
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS &
382.05
931946
HANES SHOE & ARCH SHOP
STEEL TOE BOOTS
102.00
931947
CLASSIC CHEVROLET
PARTS /POLICE UNITS
56.51
931948
KEYSTONE EQUIPMENT CO
PARTS /WASTEWATER & STREET
166.99
931949
REYNOLDS RADIATOR REPAIR
REPAIR RADIATORS
264.00
931965
TULSA BRAKE AND CLUTCH
PARTS
72.00
931979
RELIABLE TIRE AND AUTO
PARTS
139.95
931980
SUBURBAN OFFICE SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
46.49
931983
B &M CLEANING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
23.85
931987
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
1,621.02
931989
TREASURER PETTY CASH
REIMB PETTY CASH
15.39
931999
CITY GARAGE
FUEL
18.76
932000
CITY GARAGE
PARTS
450.92
932031
PSO
2/93 USE
128.81
932032
LDCC INC -AT &T
2/93 USE
2.68
932033
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE.
2/93 PLEXAR
22.22
932035
OKLA NATURAL GAS
2/93 USE
446.78
DEPARTMENT TOTAL =___> 14,658.14
FUND TOTAL =___> 14,658.14
GRAND TOTAL =___> 266,125.07
OWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
PAYROLL PAYMENT REPORT
PAY PERIOD ENDING DATE 03/20/93
DEPARTMENT
AMOUNT
....>:::..:..:..:..:.:.:;.:'. ::::.::.;:.i:,.ii:.i.;i;:. >:;ti. iii:.::. i:.»:. isti. i:. i:. i:.:;::•:;. ii:. i> ii:. i:. i:.::. i:. i:.: :ti.ii:.ii:i<;:: >: >:::: >:::: » >;: < <:::.:..:. :. ::;:.
DPW. �.:. ����;;; a>.:..::.....:; ...: ................::............. ..... ��...::'.::::':::: >:
Water
3,519.12
Refuse
3,823.81
..+x: ;.v;:•N?TTi1'+.K-0^0.�C! .. .. bM�i` O,.: T• Y, rvtiC•}) h: a�0) 0.! nW: ti�.; P•: NG< t;} ivi W;, 4,: ��?': h::•T w: L•' r•'•;:•:•:•::{ 9YfriC• T: ti�+ <:)i�ii:: {•:5•TTT:• } »T +T ^J %•ii: } }:•:T .:
::......:::..:.. ....... : v: n:....:::::. v::: ::.v..:.:iti<•::.:.::•::.:vnv::: }$i:�Ji ?:::4:4: tii4i:iii:4i:;:;!;; {; {•i:: nv.; ti•::;•i:4 "'•: ;: .. ..'rr:'.': '.:•i:
v::::.tiv: \i:S!•: ;•:•i }iii;G:•i:•iiii:'i v:i:i;:jii iii :i0ii:i::::::i:::i::ii::i$:tiv ii:;iv:•i :iii'. �' •i :>: ' . '.:i:
}� :: 4! 41: k�ie? ii': c::: ti;:: �:: r:%;: i;: iiiii:•::.'' ii: : ?is,•i:::t:i:ii:•.'.::::•;:�;: r: ': <:: iii: ?�iti :::iii:' {:iiiii <i::•:ifiiiiii:: r::'i:;:iii,
���,'. Y��:
iii ,' v.• m. rvm.: vv. Yn'i:• n{r. Kvtr: 4n+% O% C�'• Ai:• r+ wx•. A4kiii:\• rA: v.{ i{; ifin; tii{ v: ki. 4. v.•:.{•:::: n:.: ::::::....v:.:::v..::.vn•..:w::
..: x:::::::::::.
:•i::: {.; }.::•tin.
': i:':': isti'::::' iw.. iv,. v.;; i.;;:;,. �.>..; pw;.'::•. .i.....a..nw::�:`m:::2:::y:::v v� .'.x,'„x..'�.n "'
.:...::.v. n.wnn:v:ww:n•.w.w.•nv::S v%�ivi:ii.•.•:.::.:v n.:. n..v.ww nw:..v.:.:.:..v:.vn:.:... n.:.:.::.v...v.....:....
?.,.. °i >i::.;` f
.�77y�[�y.�`�'�• {{`���
APPROVED: 04/06/93
Chairman
Trustee
Trustee
NEMoxnrmuM
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND TRUSTEES
IOWASSO PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY
' FROM: MIKE AUGUSTINE, OPWA DIRECTOR
ROHN MUNN, PROJECT MANAGER
'
SUBJECT: AWARDING OF CONTRACTS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
,. WATER LINE, WASTEWATER LINE AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
IDATE: March 29, 1993
IBACKGROUND:
The City of Owasso secured a low interest loan from the Oklahoma Water Resources Board for
improvements to the water distribution system, wastewater collection system and wastewater
treatment facility. The approval of the loan required that staff start a process of selecting an
engineering firm for the design of the improvements. Staff selected five engineering firms to
interview and to request a proposal for the improvements. The five firms that staff invited were
Poe & Associates; Bruton, Knowles & Love; CH2M Hill; FHC, Inc.; and NOVA Engineering.
' Staff outlined to each firm that their proposal should be based on the information presented to
them and the following:
' 1. The loan from the Water Resources Board would be between $5,300,000 and $6,100,000
and this amount was for all aspects of engineering design and construction of the
projects.
2. Replacement of approximately 15,500 linear feet of cast iron water lines with PVC
piping.
3. Replacement/repair of approximately 70,000 linear feet of clay tile (VCP) wastewater
lines. Approximately 29,500 linear feet identified as having a possibility of line
replacement by using the open trench construction method and approximately 40,500
' linear feet identified as possible repair using a form of slip liner. The linear footages
used for either construction technique does not consider possible changes as a result of
engineering review and design.
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING CONTRACT
March 29, 1993
Page 2
4. Camera work of the wastewater lines would be a separate issue.
5. The wastewater treatment plant design was to incorporate an update of the City of
Owasso's NPDES permit to the level of Tulsa's Northside Treatment Plant.
6. Resident inspector would be negotiated after a contract was issued.
Of the five firms that staff had interviewed only CH2M Hill declined to present a proposal.
PROPOSALS:
The proposals from each of the four firms is summarized below in no particular order. Keep
in mind, each proposal consisted of whatever it took to get each firm's suggestion(s) across to
the reviewing staff, either with documentation or verbal confrontation, etc.
1. POE & ASSOCIATES: This firm's presentation was very weak and there was not any
information presented that staff did not have previous knowledge. The firm handed out
a written proposal outlining scope of services and other pertinent information. However,
alternates were not mentioned for either the replacement of the VCP or treatment plant
expansion.
2. NOVA ENGINEERING: This firm's presentation was excellent in the areas of water
and sanitary sewer. The staff felt they knew the information they were presenting and
left a very good impression afterwards. They were, however, weak in the treatment
plant expansion in that they could not give a definite view of what needed to be done or
accomplished.
3. BRUTON. KNOWLES & LOVE: This firm's presentation consisted of one person
sitting across from the reviewing staff and verbally shared the presentation. After the
representative left, the staff felt the .firm did not have a complete understanding of the
proposal presentation aspect that staff had requested. Knowing that this firm's previous
work and design record is excellent, made staff feel uneasy on agreeing at this time that
this firm understands and is capable of producing a finished product that is acceptable.
4. FHC. INC.: This firm presented staff with written material, used flip charts and gave
a top quality presentation, especially in the area of the treatment plant expansion. They
presented a strong understanding of the present and future situations that will be facing
the city for the plant expansion. They impressed upon staff that they were very capable
of meeting the city's need for a plant expansion and working with Oklahoma State
Department of Health on this project. Their past and current treatment plant design
LI
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING CONTRACT
March 29, 1993
Page 3
experiences for various cities in Oklahoma was very extensive for different type of
plants.
The following table is a cost evaluation of the water line, wastewater line and wastewater
treatment plant projects:
ENGINEERNG FEE COMPARSION OF DESIGN PROJECTS
ENGINEERING FIRM
WATER
LINE
SEWER
LINE
PLANT
DESIGN
TOTAL
COST
POE & ASSOCIATES
$ 54,000
$296,000
$133,800
$483,800
NOVA ENGINEERING
$ 49,000
$ 75,000
$220,000
$344,000
FHC, INC.
$ 52,000
$212,500
$230,000
$494,500
BRUT N, KNOWLES &
LOVE
$ 16,000
$193,000
$152,400
$361,400
AMENDMENT OF PROPOSALS:
The review of staff notes from the verbal presentations and written material presented by each
engineering firm left staff with a feeling that there should be a study of the treatment facility
prior to the engineering design. This would ensure that proper design information was available
before selection of a treatment process change or equipment change. With this concern in mind
staff contacted each engineering firm to prepare an amendment of their proposal based on the
following:
1. A separate engineering fee for the water line replacement.
2. A separate engineering fee for the wastewater line replacement.
3. A separate engineering fee for the initial treatment plant study that would address future
NPDES permit requirements and Tulsa's Northside treatment plant discharge levels.
4. A possibility that two contracts for design services could be written (one for both water
and wastewater lines and the other for treatment plant study).
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING CONTRACT
March 29, 1993
Page 4
All engineering firms responded and the following is a cost breakdown:
ENGINEERING FEE COMPARISON OF AMENDMENT
ENGINEERING FIRM
WATER
LINE
SEWER
LINE
TOTAL
WATER &
SEWER
PLANT
STUDY
POE & ASSOCIATES
$54,000
$296,000
$350,000
$18,000
NOVA ENGINEERING
$49,000
$ 75,000
$124,000
$20,000
FHC, INC.
$52,000
$212,500
$264,500
$29,250
BRUTON, KNOWLES
& LOVE
$16,000
$193,000
$209,000
$75,000
SUMMARY:
The review process has taken longer than staff anticipated, but it was necessary to truly obtain
a mutual understanding of what was and would be expected from all parties. The amendment
process allowed staff to concentrate on what needed to be accomplish in the next 5 to 10 years.
Also, the review process has shown staff that the water line and wastewater line projects should
be awarded as a single contract.
NOVA Engineering presented staff a proposal that reduced engineering fees for the design of
the water line and wastewater line projects. This was accomplished by recommending the use
of plan view drawings for both bid and construction drawings. Since both the water and
wastewater projects are rehabilitation (replacement of existing lines) and not new construction
there is not the need to expend funds for unneeded engineering design costs. NOVA has
completed similar style of projects for the City of Tulsa.
NOVA's overall proposal for the water line and wastewater line projects outlined the preparation
of; design drawings, detail drawings, manhole rehabilitation schedule, construction
specifications, engineers construction cost estimate, and construction bid proposal and bid
documents. Their proposal met the requested scope of services that had been outlined and staff
feels that NOVA Engineering is a firm competent of producing quality engineering design
documents.
i
1
1
1
N
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING CONTRACT
March 29, 1993
Page 5
The wastewater treatment plant expansion is the most critical design project of the three. Should
objectives not be clearly defined or consideration of more stringent discharge limits and
expanding discharge flows are not properly addressed the plant expansion becomes a restriction
on the growth of the city. In order to overcome these potential hurdles it requires utilization of
an engineering firm with a strong background in wastewater treatment plant design and very
knowledgeable of the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Oklahoma
State Department of Health.
Jon Nelson, Vice President/Chief Engineer of FHC, Inc., presented the foremost comprehensive
strategy for the expansion of the wastewater treatment plant. The proposal presentation
described objectives of meeting Tulsa's Northside Wastewater Treatment Plant limits, increasing
plant capacity and meeting stricter water quality standards for discharge. Other considerations
were outlined for meeting more stringent discharge levels and overall plant capacity, prudent
improvements and alternatives for the sludge system.
The plant design should be accomplished in three phases according to Mr. Nelson's presentation.
The first phase would be an evaluation of the treatment plant to include a summary of project
conditions, identification of viable alternatives, a cost analysis of the viable alternatives, selection
of the most suitable alternative and a summary in detail of the selected alternative. Phase Two
would be the preparation of the detailed plans and specifications for all plant improvements
identified in the selected alternatives. Phase Three would be the preparation of an amendment
to the Sludge Management Plan and revisions to the operation and maintenance (O &M) manual.
FHC, Inc. responded to staff's request for a wastewater treatment plant study, as an amendment,
by stating that their original proposal covered this study. They further stated that the amendment
that had been submitted expanded the inital approach of the plant study. The expanded approach
would include a summary of all information and issues from various agencies which would be
pertinent to the wastewater treatment aspects.
FHC, Inc. proposal and amendment to the proposal were more concise and contained a specific
course to be taken for the plant design was more informative than the proposals of the other
engineering firms. FHC's list of current and past contracts is quite extensive and they have been
with a number of nearby cities. The personnel of FHC is highly qualified for this type of
project especially with Jon Nelson being a part of their staff. Mr. Nelson's experience has been
in the wastewater area where he has worked closely with various cities.
Staff believes that FHC, Inc. is the most qualified engineering firm for the wastewater treatment
plant study due to their proposal presentation, information presented to staff, their understanding
of the needs of Owasso, current and past jobs, and the personnel that would be used on this
project.
MEMORANDUM '
ENGWEERING CONTRACT
March 29, 1993 '
Page 6
RECOMAIENDATION: I
Staff recommends that the Trustees award a contract for the water and wastewater lines '
engineering design to Nova Engineering in the amount of $124,000 and the Trustees award a
contract for the wastewater treatment plant study to FHC, Inc. in the amount of $29,20.
NOTE:
Should the Trustees follow staff's recommendation of awarding a contract for a wastewater '
treatment plant study there will need to be an additional contract for the design of the treatment
plant after the study is completed and a constructin option is approved by the Trustees. The ,
awarding of a study contract does not make a commitment to the engineering firm that they
would receive the plant design contract.
1