HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003.04.08_Worksession Agenda
3. Discussion Relating to Planning Items.
A. Zoning Requests
B. Right of Way Closure
C. Easement Closure
D. Other Items
Mr. Moore
Mr. Wiles
Attachment #3
2. Discussion of Public Works Items
A. Stormwater Management
B. Other Items
Mr. Can
Attachment #2
1. Call to Order
Mayor Helm
AGENDA
Notice and agenda filed in the office ofthe City Clerk and posted on the City Hall bulletin board
at 4:00 p.m. on Friday, Aplil 4, 2003.
Special
April 8, 2003
6:00 p.m.
Owasso City Hall
Main Conference Room
TYPE OF MEETING:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE MEETING OF THE
OW ASSO CITY COUNCIL
7. Adjournment.
6. Report from City Manager
A. Status of Negotiations
B. Status of Budget Preparation for FY04
C. Status ofFY03 Finances and Impact on Cunent Budget
D. Other Items
5. Discussion Relating to an lnterlocal Agreement Between the Cities of
Collinsville Providing for the Use of Available Jail Space.
Mr. Ray
Attachment #5
4. Discussion Relating to Central Baptist Church Building
Mr. Ray
Attachment #4
Owasso City Council
April 8, 2003
Page 2
"Phase II" cities and counties must develop a comprehensive Stormwater Management Program
that addresses six "Minimum Control Measures" (MCMs). These are:
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS:
Owasso was not originally included, but was evaluated using secondary criteria, such as
discharge to sensitive waters, high growth or growth potential, high population density,
contiguity to an urbanized area and significant contribution of pollutants to waters of the United
States. As a result of this evaluation, the City of Ow as so has been notified that the city meets the
conditions to be designated as a regulated small MS4.
Cities located within a U.S. Census Bureau Urbanized Area were automatically designated.
Within the Tulsa Urbanized Area, such cities as Broken Arrow, Sand Springs, Jenks, Bixby and
Sapulpa were designated.
On December 8, 1999, EP A published final "Phase II" regulations and state regulatOlY agencies
(which includes the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ)) were required to
determine cities under 100,000 population and designate small MS4s that require permitting.
The small MS4s are defined as those towns with at least 10,000 population and a minimum
density of 1,000 people per square mile.
In 1990 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated regulations for
establishing water quality based municipal stormwater programs to address stonnwater runoff
flom municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) serving populations of 100,000 or greater.
These "Phase I" regulations were incorporated into the existing wastewater treatment permits
under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) rules. As a result, urban
runoff from storm events became regulated.
BACKGROUND:
Apri14, 2003
F. ROBERT CARR, JR., P.E.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OW ASSO
MEl\10RANDUM
Work elements for FY03-04 have been tabulated and proposed costs identified. Elements are
divided to identify regional activities by INCOG that would be allocated to Owasso and those
activities that would remain solely the responsibility of Owasso. Projected costs of compliance
for FY03-04 Phase II requirements are shown to be approximately $30,000. (A portion of the
listed costs are already included in existing operational budgets (i.e., Recycle Center, Household
Pollutant Collection events)).
FY03-04 PROGRAM COSTS:
As a result of these meetings, INCOG has prepared a tabulation of work tasks that will help
implement many aspects of the Phase II requirements. Specific activities regarding public
education, public participation, training of city personnel and regional data management and
reporting are included (see attached estimated cost summary). As proposed, INCOG, working
with other neighboring Phase II cities and counties, will provide regional services, many of
which are listed as BMPs for each MCM.
To aid in the transfer of information and explanation of the regulations to member communities,
the Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) assembled a Stormwater Management
Steering Committee. Various meetings were held with interested communities and a regional
perspective developed to approach the program requirements. The regional approach was
encouraged by Owasso and Jenks in order to minimize duplication of effort, consolidate work
items that would be required by all communities and enable data, information and resources
sharing.
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SJ'EERlNG COMMITTEE:
the
implementing a II
Control Measure a Management
constitute the core activities pertaining to each. The Phase regulations require that the
regulated community submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to apply for coverage under the Oklahoma
Stormwater General Permit (OKR04) along with a Stormwater Management Program document
(SWMP) that specifies for each MCM what activities will be performed, measurable goals,
implementation schedules and estimated annual costs. An Annual Report is to be submitted to
the ODEQ that documents implementation and BMF effectiveness under each of the six MCMs.
i!l Public Education and Outreach
i!l Public Participation and Involvement
i!l Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
i!l Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
i!l Post Construction Management in New Development
i!l Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping
Page 2
Stormwater Management Program
1. Storm Water Phase II Letter of Designation from DEQ dated December 9, 2002
2. Storm Water Phase II Final Rule - Small MS4 Storm Water Program Overview
(EPA Fact Sheet 2.0)
3. Estimated Costs for Phase II Program for FY03-04
ATTACHMENTS:
Details of the fee structure and the ordinance establishing the fee are being developed at this
time. It is expected a proposal will be made in early May for Council consideration.
A total of $180,000 is proposed in the FY03-04 budget. Beyond the FY03-04 budget year,
however, additional Phase II Best Management Practices and stormwater system improvements
identified in the master plan capital improvements program will be needed on an on-going basis.
Therefore, a stormwater management fee is being proposed, which would be included for the
first time in the FY03-04 budget as a means to fund the program requirements.
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE~
In addition to the above, development and performance of a comprehensive Stormwater Master
Plan is proposed. The plan is a critical element in data collection and is needed in portions of the
Phase II program. Cost of preparing the master plan has been included in the FY03-04 Public
Works Depaxtment Engineering Division budget in the amount of $150,000. The plan is
intended to include, but not be limited to, stormwater collection system mapping, drainage area
determination, projections stormwater quantities by drainage basin, assessment of needed
a
Page 3
Stormwater Management Program
prlntod on rocyclod popor willi BOY Inl,
n
q'l3~i
707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKlAHOMA CIlY, OKlAHOMA 73101-1677
The DEQ has completed its review ofthose cities located outside of an UA. We have
determined that the City of Ow as so meets the conditions to be designated as a regulated
small MS4. This letter constitutes your notice that the City of Owasso will be required to
obtain a small MS4 permit. DEQ is cunently developing a general permit for this
purpose. After that pennit is finalized, you must submit your application by June 9,
2003.
The Storm Water Phase II rules required evaluation of those cities, outside of an UA,
with a 2000 Census population greater than 10,000 with a density of greater than 1,000
people per square mile. These cities were evaluated by criteria including discharge to
sensitive waters, high growth or growth potential, high population density, contiguity to
an urbanized area, significant contribution of pollutants to waters ofthe United States.
Small MS4s are defined as those towns with at least a 10,000 population and a minimum
density of 1,000 people per square mile or those MS4s, that are not regulated under the
Phase I rules, located in an Urbanized Area. The regulations created two methods on
determining what Small MS4s need to be permitted. Those cities that are located within
an US Census Bureau Urbanized Area (VA) are automatically designated and are
required to apply for a permit by March 10,2003. The second method is for the
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to examine and designate those small MS4s
that are located outside of an Urbanized Area. According to the 2000 US Census City of
Owasso has a population of 18,502 and a density of 1753.74.
On December 8, 1999 the EPA published the Storm Water Phase II final rules. Phase II
included several changes to the stonn water program across the state. Under the new
Phase II rules regulatory agencies were required to determine and designate those small
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) that required permitting.
Dear Mr. Brogdon
Stonn Water Phase II, Letter Designation
180
Oklahoma 74055..0180
Randy Brogdon
Mayor
December 9,2002
FRANK KEATING
Governor
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
OKIAHOM;\
prI'MJM[lH Of WVlkONMfN1Al QUIIlIIY
STEVEN A. THOMPSON
Executive Director
cc. Robert Carr, Public Works Director, City of Ow as so
SW /MDIBRJsw
Mark Derichsweiler, Engineering Manager
Watershed Planning and Storm Water Permitting
Water Quality Division
,~
Sincerely,
If you have questions or need additional infonnation, feel free to contact Stephen Weber
at (405) 702-8194 or by emaiI atStc12hen.WcbCJ:@)dccptate.ok.us
A Copy oi'the Phase II Designation Final Report and an ErA Fact Sheet on the small
MS4 program are enclosed.
,')'/or/ll Wole,. Pilose II. !,c(/a rd"f)csigl/o/iol/
Pg. 2
Scoring:
l!l Population - 1 point for every 10,000 people (rounded up to the nearest 10,000).
l!l Density - I point for every 100 density increase above 1,000 (rounded up to the
nearest 100).
l!l Previous change (Percent) - 2 points for between 0 and 1 percent. 3 points for
changes of 1-10%. 4 points for changes of 10-15%. 5 points for changes of 15-
20%. 6 points for changes of20-25%. 7 points for changes of25-30%. 8 points
for changes of 30-35%. 9 points for changes of 35-40%. 10 points for 40+%
@ Land Size - 5 points if Corporate Land Area is 10-50% larger than what is
necessary to obtain a 1,500 density. 10 points if Corporate Land Area is 50+%
larger than what is necessary to obtain a 1,500 density.
@ Contiguity to an Urbanized Area - 15 points if directly adjacent. 10 points if the
city boundaries are within 2 miles of an UA. 5 points if the city boundaries are
within 5 miles of an UA.
@ 303(d) listed streams - 20 points if the town would directly discharge to the listed
stream. 10 points if the town is within 5 miles ofthe listed stream.
@ HQW, ORW, SWS, Scenic River or ORW/SWS watersheds - 20 points if the city
would discharge directly to a HQW, SWS, or Scenic River. 20 points if the city is
located within a SWS watershed. 25 points if the city would discharge directly to
an ORW or is located within an ORW watershed.
("100)
TOTAL:
l!l HQW, ORW, Scenic River, SWS, or ORW/SWS Watersheds (25)
Discharge or Potential Discharge to Sensitive Waters
l!l 303(d) listed streams for Storm Water related pollutants (20)
Contiguity to an Urbanized Area (15)
(10)
@) Corporate Land
( Hi)
\'V
High Growth or High Growth Potential
@) Change from Previous
(10)
Density
( 10)
Population
Small MS4 Grade Sheet
OWt15SO
The Phase Il Rule defines a small MS4 storm water management program as a program
comprising six clements that, when implemented in conceit, are expected to result in
significant reductions of pollutants discharged into receiving waterbodics.
Implementation of the MEP standard will typically require the development and
implementation ofBMPs and the achievement of measurable goals to satisfy each of the six
minimum control measures.
operators of regulated small MS4s are required to design their programs to:
o Reduce the discharge of pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable" (MEP);
o Protect water quality; and
o Satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act.
What Are the Phase II Small MS4 Program Requirements?
Asmall MS4 is any MS4 not already covered by the Phase I program as a medium or large
MS4. The Phase II Rule automatically covers on a nationwide basis all small MS4s
located in "urbanized areas" (VAs) as defined by the Bureau of the Census (unless waived by
the NPDES permitting authority), and on a case-by-case basis those small MS4s located outside
ofDAs that the NPDES permitting authority designates. For more information on Phase II
small MS4 coverage, see Fact Sheets 2. I and 2.2.
What Is a Phase n Small MS4?
In 1990, EP A promulgated rules establishing Phase I of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) storm water program. The Phase I program for MS4s requires
operators of "medium" and "large" MS4s, that is, those that generally serve populations of
100,000 or greater, to implement a storm water management program as a means to control
polluted discharges from these MS4s. The Storm Water Phase II Rule extends coverage of the
NPDES storm water program to certain "small" MS4s but takes a slightly different approach to
how the storm water management program is developed and implemented.
Polluted storrn water runofT is often transported to municipal separate storm sewer systems
(MS4s) and ultimately discharged into local rivers and streams without treatment. EPA's
StOlID Water Phase II Rule establishes an MS4 storm water management program that is
intended to improve the Nation's watelways by reducing the quantity of pollutants that storm
water picks up and carries into storm sewer systems during storm events. Common pollutants
include oil and grease from roadways, pesticides from lawns, sediment from construction sites,
and carelessly discarded trash, such as cigarette butts, paper wrappers, and plastic bottles.
When deposited into nearby waterways through MS4 discharges, these pollutants can impair
the waterways, thereby discouraging recreational use of the resource, contaminating drinking
water supplies, and interfering with the habitat for fish, other aquatic organisms, and wildlife.
r
r
II
torm
Final
ha
r
at
EPA 833-F-00-002
January 2000
Fact Sheet 2.0
Office of Water
(4203)
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
3.1 - Construction Rainfall
Erosivity Waiver
Industrial "No Exposure"
4.0 - Conditional No Exposure
Exclusion for Industrial Activity
2.9 - Permitting and Reporting:
The Process and Requirements
2.10 - Federal and State-Operated
MS4s: Program Implementation
Construction Program
3.0 - Construction Program
Overview
2.3 - Public Education and
Outreach
2.4 - Public Participation!
Involvement
2.5 - Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination
2.6 - Construction Site Runoff
Control
2.7 - Post-Construction Runoff
Control
2.8 - Pollution PreventionlGood
Housekeeping
Minimum Conlfol Measures
Small MS4 Program
2.0 - Small MS4 Storm Water
Program Overview
2.1 - Who's Covered? DeSignation
and Waivers of Regulated Small
MS4s
2.2 - Urbanized Areas: Definition
and Description
Overview
1.0 - Storm Water Phase II Final
Rule: An Overview
Storm Water II
Final Rule
Fact Sheet
l&. Storm Water Phase II Final Rule (64 FR 68722)
Internet: www.epa.gov/owm/sw/phase2
Contact the U.S. EPA Water Resource Center
Phone: 202 260-7786
E-mail: center. water-resouree@epa.gov
Contact
l&' U.S. EP A Office of Wastewater Management
Phone: 202260-5816
E-mail: SW2@epa.gov
Internet: www.epa.gov/owm/sw/phase2
Reference Documents
l&' Storm Water Phase II Final Rule Fact Sheet Series
Internet: www.epa.gov/owm/sw/phase2
For Additional Information
Pennittees need to evaluate the effectiveness of their chosen
BMPs to determine whether the BMPs are reducing the
discharge of pollutants from their systems to the "maximum
extent practicable" and to determine if the BMP mix is
satisfying the water quality requirements of the Clean Water
Act. PeImittees also are required to assess their progress
in achieving their program's measurable goals. While
monitoring is not required under the rule, the NPDES
pennitting authority has the discretion to require monitoring
if deemed necessary. If there is an indication of a need for
improved controls, pennittees can revise their mix of BMPs
to create a more effective program. For more information
on program evaluation/assessment, see Fact Sheet 2.9.
What Kind of Program Evaluation/Assessment Is
Required?
Fr. he mle identifies a number of implementation options for
. regulated small MS4 operators. These include sharing
responsibility for program development with a nearby
regulated small MS4, taking advantage of existing local or
State programs, or participating in the implementation of an
existing Phase I MS4's storm water program as a co-pelmittce.
These options are intended to promote a regional approach to
storm water management coordinated on a watershed basis.
What Are the Implementation
or NOI, its chosen BMPs and measurable goals for cach
minimum control measure. To help pcrmittees identify the
most appropriate BMPs for their programs, EP A will isslle a
"menu," ofBMPs to serve as guidance. NPDES permitting
authorities can modify the EP A menu or develop their own
list. For more infommtion on application requirements, see
Fact Sheet 2.9.
The Phase II program for MS4s is designed to
accommodate a general permit approach using a Notice
of Intent (NOI) as the permit application. The operator of a
regulated small MS4 must include in its permit application,
What Information Must the NPDES Permit
Application Include?
CD Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping
Developing and implementing a program with the goal of
preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal
operations. The program must include municipal staff
training on pollution prevention measures and techniques
(e.g., regular street sweeping, reduction in the use of
pesticides or street salt, or frequent catch-basin cleaning).
Post-Construction Runoff Control
Developing, implementing, and enforcing a program to
address discharges of post-construction storm water
runoff from new development and redevelopment areas.
Applicable controls could include preventative actions
such as protecting sensitive areas (e.g., wetlands) or the
use of structural BMPs such as grassed swales or porous
pavement.
Construction Site Runoff Control
Developing, implementing, and enforcing an erosion and
sediment control program for constmction activities that
disturb I or more acres of land (controls could include
silt fences and temporary storm water detention ponds).
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Developing and implementing a plan to detect and
eliminate illicit discharges to the storm sewer system
(includes developing a system map and informing the
community about hazards associated with illegal
discharges and improper disposal of waste).
Public
Providing opportunities for citizens to participate in
program development and implementation, including
effectively publicizing public hearings and/or
encouraging citizen representatives on a storm water
management panel.
Public Education and Outreach
Distributing educational materials and perfOlming
outreach to infOlID citizens about the impacts polluted
stOlm water runoff discharges can have on water quality.
The six MS4 program elements, tem1ed "minimum control
mcasllres:' are outlined below. For more infonnation on each
of these required control measures, see Fact Sheets 2.3 - 2.8.
1'1Ige 2
Fact Sheet 2.0 - An Overview of the Small MS4 Storm Water Program
~ _,~ -------- ",ut .4-
$100 $0
$150 $0
$50 $100
$200 $0
$200 $0
$1,200 $0
$300 $0
$300 $0
$300 $0
$2,800 ~ $100 :=J
INCOG Contract Est, Local Costs
$200 $0
$200 $0
$100 $0
$200 $0
$400 $0
$500 $0
$0 $100
$100 $0
$500 $0
$400 $0
$400 $0
$500 $0
$300 $0
$3,800 J~~ $100 I
INCOG Contract Est. Local Costs
$200 $0
$200 $0
$200 $0
$200 $0
$200 $0
$150 $0
$100 $0
$0 $0
$1,500 $0
$0 $260
$50 $100
$700 $0
$500 $0
$500 $0
IV. ADMINISTRATION. REGIONAL SUPPORT
Host regional Stormwater Ordinance Work Group
Assist with adoption of illicit discharge ordinance
Assist with adoption of construction ordinance
Assist with adoption of post-construction ordinance
Develop program to receive information from the public
Help modify site plan review process for water quality
Support regional agency-sponsored seminar
City Personnel (total of all manpower, fringe and indirects)
Cost: Contract to create regional database
Cost: Annual ODEQ Phase II General Permit Fee
Cost: Misc. administrative supplies
Manage regional data / evaluate BMPs
Prepare regional portions of Annual Report
Assist with preparation of Annual Report
SUB-TOTAL:!
SUB-TOTAL:[~
1110 MAPPING. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Host Regional Mapping Work Group
Evaluate GIS capabilities, goals, current resources
Assist with purchase of GIS hardware / software
Create regional naming / coding system for features
Collect local and regional existing map data
Collect local and regional pollution data
Cost: Misc. administrative supplies
Cost: Purchase hardware / software / data
Assist city with locating Outfalls
Assist city with defining Priority Areas
Create and maintain regional data repository
Assist with local map production
Facilitate sharing of map data with other cities
Ii. TRAINiNG PROGRAMS
Cost: Purchase modules, CDs, videos, etc.
Cost: Print and duplicate quantities
Cost: Misc. administrative supplies
"Localize" modules for city
Create training schedules
Conduct training using modules
Create database and track training
Collect data on MCM activities / evaluate Measurable Goals
Summarize data for Annual Report
Est. Local Costs
$0
$0
$0
$100
$0
$0
$0
$0
INCOG Contract
$'100
$100
$1,200
$50
$100
$300
$200
$300
City of Owasso
I. BROCHURE DEVELOPMENT / DISTRIBUTION
Select types of brochures
Acquire brochure art
Cost: Print brochures
Cost: Misc. administrative supplies
Create distribution schedule
Distribute brochures
Create inventory and track distribution
Collect data on MCM activities / evaluate Measurable Goals
Summarize data for Annual Report
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II PROGRAM:
For FY~2004 Budget Cycle
Green text represents purchases
$0
$0
L $3()o
Est. Local Costs
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500
$300
$6,900
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,000
$14,700 --.J
Est. Local Costs
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,480
$12,480
Est. Local Costs
$27,840
]
I
--L
$53,320
$0
$700
$5,200
INCOG Contract
$100
$200
$300
$300
$200
$200
$200
$200
$100
$'100
$100
$200
$500
$500
$400
$0
$0
$0
$200
$800
$250
$700
$0
$200
$0
$180
$1,500
$0
. ~ $7,430 ~
INCOG Contract
$200
$200
$500
$300
$300
$300
$300
$100
$300
$500
$300
$300
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,600
INCOG Contract
$25,480
TOTAL: [
VI. TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS
VI. INSPECTIONS. REGIONAL SUPPORT
Assist with designing the inspection program scope
Assist with developing forms and acquiring resources
Help prepare maps and determine priority areas
Help identify facilities and collect facility data
Collect existing local and regional pollution data
Create regional database for data exchange and reporting
Assist with developing source tracking inspection program
Assist with obtaining professional services for inspections
Coordinate sharing of inspection data between cities
Assist with analysis and management of data
Collect data on MCM activities / evaluate Measurable Goals
Summarize data for Annual Report
Cost: Purchase electronic equip. (laptop, GPS, etc.)
Cost: Purchase sampling equip. (Hydrolab, field kits, etc.)
Cost: Annual payment on vehicles
Cost: Professional inspection services for source tracking
SUB-TOTAL:!
SUB-TOTAL:!
Discuss Phase" in city council meetings
Cost: Develop and maintain regional stolTnwater web site
SUB-TOTAL:[
V. COMMUNITY. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Assist city with sponsorship of local clean-up events
Create display board for public meetings
Create signs for community education
Create signs for city work areas
Coordinate Blue Thumb school presentations
Coordinate Blue Thumb volunteer stream monitoring
Coordinate Blue Thumb stormdrain marking
Coordinate Blue Thumb stream cleanup events
Assist with advertisement of events
Help City promote household pollutant collection events
Help City promote use of recycling centers
Develop items with water quality logos for distribution
Collect data on MCM activities / evaluate Measurable Goals
Summarize data for Annual Report
Cost: Blue Thumb administrative costs
Cost: Trash disposal cost for local cleanup events
Cost: Advertising costs for all stormwater issues
Cost: Cost for citizen use of Pollutant Collection Events
Cost: Purchase of "give-away" items for local events
Cost: Blue Thumb supplies for chemical monitoring ($800/site)
Cost: Blue Thumb school presentations ($150/3 schools)
Cost: Blue Thumb stormdrain marking ($7 or $3.5 /rnarker)
Cost: Blue Thumb volunteer monthly Newsletter ($i80/city)
Cost: Blue Thumb Business Partners Newsletter ($100-400/city)
Cost: Blue Thumb Display board ($200/event)
Cost: Blue Thumb biological monitoring ($180/site)
Cost: Blue Thumb supplies for stream cleanup ($1500/site)
Cost: Recycling center costs
Composed of traditional single family detached housing.
Serve as transition zones between higher intensity uses and rural residential.
Suited to areas that contain or are projected to contain municipal sewer service.
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2 - 5 dwelling units per acre)
Excerptfrom the Owasso 2010 Master Plan:
The land use description related to low-density residential in the Owasso Master Plan IS
comprised of three components. The components are listed below:
The Owasso 2010 Master Plan identifies the subject property as having a future land use of low-
density residential. The applicant is proposing a zoning classification that is considered high
density in nature. This high-density zoning classification would seem to be inconsistent with the
future land use; however staff finds the disagreement in designation to merely be a matter of
semantic disagreement rather than one of substance.
ANALYSIS:
The subject site receives residential water service from Washington County Rural Water Distlict
#3. Residential sewer service will be provided by the City of Ow as so.
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from AG (Agricultural General District)
to RS-3 (Residential Single Family High Density District) for the purpose of completing Country
Estates VI, a residential subdivision. A general area map and a complete legal description have
been attached for your information and review.
The City of Owasso has received a request from DG&S Properties for the review of a rezoning
for approximately 11.33 acres, more or less. The subject property is located on the west side of
N. Garnett Rd., approximately 2,640 feet north of the E. 116th St. N. and N. Garnett Rd.
intersection.
BACKGROUND:
ROBERT MOORE
CITY PLANNER
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OW ASSO
TO:
MEMORANDUM
1. General Area Map.
2. OZ 03-02 Application.
3. Legal Notice.
4. Letter to Surrounding Property Owners.
ATTACHMENTS:
Upon Planning Commission approval, the item will be scheduled for the April 15, 2003 regularly
scheduled City Council meeting.
The rezoning request will be heard by the City of Planning Commission on Monday, April 7,
2003. Staffwill recommend approval of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The rezoning was reviewed at the March 26, 2003 regular meeting of the City Owasso
Technical Advisory Committee. Staff or utility providers provided no comments.
not
at April 2003
has received no calls or
anticipate public opposition concerning the
Meeting.
The Country Estates VI preliminary plat is to also be heard on the April 7, 2003 agenda and is
comprised of the area to be rezoned in this application. The Country Estates VI preliminary plat
proposes a density of 3.26 dwelling units per acre, which is well within the stated density
discussed in the Owasso 2010 Master Plan. FUlthermore, the plat proposes traditional single
family detached housing with residential sewer service available on site. Therefore, based on the
above definitions and the proposed density of the Country Estates VI preliminary plat, staff finds
that the rezoning request is consistent with the Owasso 2010 Master Plan.
ope MEETfNG DA TE__~_ ___.
APPROVED~_DE;\ll:D _~_ __
SUB1\IITT AL Dr\TE
FEE RECEiPT ~U;Y[BER_
Fee Schedule
O. 0<;9 ~crl:$ $75
l- 499 acres 100
5-1999 ;Jeres 150
20 + acres 20U
Please ~ubnJ[[ the completed applicarion [01111 and appticatiOI1 ke alon~ with a Cert\1ieo 100' Radius Repol'c
(JV;lj!,\lI.,: (.<)111 an ,c\bsrfact Company) to the Owusso City P13nner on or before the Planlllng CQmfui,Slon
submirt<ll deadline as sht)wjJ on the official City OfOW3,;:SO calendar. The applicant and/or the lippliclHlt',
consu!UrH should attend the PI..lllJling Commission meeting,;: at which the SlJrf'l~me!Jt::d Zonilij:, vvill t't
I<:dn'td.
DATE
~./'7#o3
---..= ~...
f DO HEREin CERTIFY THATTHI:: lr'lfORV1ATlOi'i HEREIN
Sl'Bt>1iTTE:l> 1:-; COI\1I'l.fTV. Tflllt ANI) A.CCtlrVI.TE
.......~~~
i\dJrc'iS or .~C'~ler:l LO(':JliOr1 of Subj~c[ ?fllpcr".)
S'~') <<I:. _~___~_.____ ______
Nill11e OrpcrS\lrl 10 be billed for p\lblicallOil 1_[,110n:_ ____
M~illr1g Address
:\; .;ppl,(anl, wh;J{ 1$ fOUl lnl<:rC'SI In thiS property')
OPre:;e(}{ Owucr OAgenl for Owner
OPurcha:;er DOlnt:r
DAttDrn~:.. t"c>r Owner
--------.- ---~~~.........=-
'--~-~."-'--~~~~-~
i'-'J:~': d:ld /\JUfCS~ oj" Record 0" ncr
~--~--~-----=>.~.~-~-~------
-~-~~~.....~-,
LEGAL OESCRIPTfON OF L/\';'\D UNDER APPLlCA TIOr'! (ICby metes and b\)\Jl1ds, ;1tta~11 pl~r \)( S I(,ey)
_ "'5[;_t;~brrTA-cHE~___~__ .___~ ________._ ___.
GEi'iCR;"\L LOlA 1
PRESt:NT
PROPOSED ZON
IVO/Z rJ../
fON
~"~..:J
-~= <>=.._~
PO l3UX I~() OWASSO. OKLAHOMA 7'1():i' (<Ji~) 272.::2> FAX ('1,1,27>;;')'
...//~
/; :%=-':'~ "
II ~ /. '.;-;-;'-.'-- .~e.~
<I. . ". \ .. '\ "
/ f . ';. f....~ .c~, \
,It,' \ .. - )'. ~,! '" \
I I \ ,....<._~J""'" \ \
\ " ..'f' \i1 ')'"
,\ ,',~ -; j
" ,..,>,.' Jf
'~""'/
, .' ,/ .--
.,to. ~(, /' ,I
'>.~~~:../../'
ell'}' OF OJY 4.SS()
r- ----I
I oz.L?3;:::~c.:~?-
-~~'~.--._- -"""-"-'---'
p, "
918 37G 1597
OwassoCommunlt~Developmnt
.)~ln 1''::; en 04: 53p
In the event that such proposed rezoning is approved, in whole or
in part, by the Owasso Planning Commission, said Planning
Commission shall submit its recommendation to the City Council of
the City of Owasso for its consideration and action, as provided by
law.
All persons interested in this matter may be present at the hearing
and present their objections to or arguments for any or all of the
above matters.
To be considered is a rezoning of approximately 11.33 acres, more
or less from AG (Agricultural General District) to RS-3
(Residential Single Family High Density District).
The property is further described as lying on the west side of N.
Garnett Rd. approximately 2,640 feet north of the N. Garnett Rd.
and E. 116th St. N. intersection, Owasso, OK.
COMMENCING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE SE/4 OF SAID
SECTION 6; THENCE NOoo05'14"E ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID SE/4, A DISTANCE OF 2,560.45 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH
ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 70.48 FEET TO
THE SE CORNER OF THE NE/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE
NOoo05'19"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NE/4, A
DISTANCE OF 558.01 FEET; THENCE N89039'43"W, A
DISTANCE OF 485.00 FEET; THENCE NOoo05'08"E, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE N89039'43"W, A
DISTANCE OF 176.76 FEET; THENCE SOoo06'48"W, A
DISTANCE OF 634.24 FEET; THENCE SOoo01'50"W, A
DISTANCE OF 294.08 FEET; THENCE S89041 '20"E, A
DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NOoo04'37"E, A
DISTANCE OF 199.62 FEET; THENCE S89040"22"E, A
DISTANCE OF 361.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
SAID TRACT CONTAINING 11.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
place, will to
classification of the following described property:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will held before
Phuvming Commission, the Community
at 7:00 on
APPJ-oIICATION: OZ-OJm.02
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF A HEARING ON A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF OW ASSO, OKLAHOMA
Robert Moore
City Planner
at
A map showing the proposed rezoning accompanies this notice.
more infonnation on the rezoning contact
Hall, 111 N.
The City Council's review of the recommendation of the Planning
Commission on the proposed rezoning shall be at a meeting time
and place to be detenruned by the Council, said information to be
available fi.om the Owasso City Planner.
As an abutting or nearby property owner, you are being notified so that you may be able to
express your views or concerns regarding this request. If you are unable to attend this meeting,
please forward any comments you may have in writing to the Owasso Community Development
Department, PO Box 180, Owasso, OK 74055. These comments will be presented to the
The propeliy is further described as lying on the west side ofN. Garnett Rd. approximately 2,640
feet north of the N. Garnett Rd. and E. ll6th St. N. intersection, Owasso, OK.
COMMENCING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE SE/4 OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE
NOoo05' 14"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SE/4, A DISTANCE OF 2,560.45 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 70.48 FEET TO THE SE CORNER OF THE NE/4 OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE NOoo05'19"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NE/4, A DISTANCE OF 558.01
FEET; THENCE N89039'43"W, A DISTANCE OF 485.00 FEET; THENCE NOoo05'08"E, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE N89039'43"W, A DISTANCE OF 176.76 FEET;
THENCE SOoo06'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 634.24 FEET; THENCE SOooOl '50"W, A
DISTANCE OF 294.08 FEET; THENCE S89041 '20"E, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET;
THENCE NOoo04'37"E, A DISTANCE OF 199.62 FEET; THENCE S89040'22"E, A
DISTANCE OF 361.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID TRACT
CONTAINING 11.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
A TRACT OF LAND IN A PART OF THE E/2 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH,
RANGE 14 EAST, OF THE INDIAN BASE & MERIDIAN, CITY OF OW ASSO, TULSA
COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Owasso Planning
Commission in the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma at 7:00
PM on the ih day of April, 2003. At that time and place, the Owasso Planning Commission will
consider a request from DG&S Properties, applicant/owner, for a proposed change of the zoning
classification of approximately 11.33 acres, more or less from AG (Agricultural General District)
to RS-3 (Residential Single Family High Density District). The subject property is described as
follows:
y'/~~-;;:~0.
/...~~"
y'Q'/~,:.::,,,,
I~/ \"~ \. ::. \:1".. \
.f *. 7.' \\:.~.~. '-'::;;.\9\';*"\
r \ \, ,~1t \'-:; , ,
~"\ \I.~_'f/ "
\ \ \ '-~'. >' J
\"~.~~i~~,/
111 North l\-Iain Street
Box 180
(918) 376-1540
(918) 376-1597
City of O}~9asso
Department of COlnmunity DevelopJ11ent
Robert Moore
City Phumer
2003,
at
Information and maps showing the property location may be inspected in the office of the City
Plaw.'1er, 111 North Main Street, Owasso, Oklahoma, 74055 or by calling 376",1543. This is your
only personal notification of this request.
Owasso Planning Commission at the scheduled public hearing by the Community Development
Staff
The Owasso 2010 Master Plan gives authority to develop and implement the Downtown
Development District Plan. The Master Plan attempts to identifY several issues or areas related to
the downtown development district. In identifYing issues, the plan outlines an action statement
and a plan to implement those actions. Of all the issues addressed by the plan, staff would like to
turn our attention to Issue #6.
The Owasso 2010 Master Plan identifies the subject property as having a future land use of low-
density residential. The applicant is proposing a zoning classification that is considered
commercial in nature. Although the approval of this request would seem to be inconsistent, the
approval of the Owasso Downtown Development District Plan should take precedence over the
Owasso 20 10 Master Plan. The request is, in staff's opinion, consistent with the Owasso
Downtown Development District Plan and should not be considered inconsistent by Master Plan
standards.
ANALYSIS:
Upon construction, the subject site would receive commercial water service from the City of
Owasso. Commercial sewer service will be provided by the City of Ow as so as well.
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (Residential Single Family
High Density District) to CG (Commercial General District) for the purpose of locating a lawn
care and landscaping office. A general area map and a complete legal description have been
attached for your infommtion and review.
The City of Owasso has received a request from Scott Moody for the review of a rezoning for
approximately .32 acre, more or less. The subject property is located at the southwest comer of
the S. Birch St. and E. 3rd Ave. intersection.
BACKGROUND:
ROBERT
PLANNER
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OW ASSO
TO:
MEMORANDUM
The primary emphasis in this area should be to retain and encourage a mixture oj
uses that continue to provide a variety oj employment opportunities, products and
services.
The uses in this area are important because they add to the diversification oj the
downtown area.
Potential redevelopment may occur opportunistically as the business market and
economy dictate.
Excerpt(s) from Section 4.5, Owasso Downtown Development District Plan:
Assuming the above assertion to be true, the discussion should now focus on the land use
designation listed in the Owasso Downtown Development District Plan. The plan calls for a
mixture of uses in the area of this request. The site is labeled as having a land use of light
industrial, warehousing and/or City services. Section 4.5 Owasso Downtown Business Park,
governs the future land use of this site.
Although the portions of the action plan may not directly affect the recommendation of this item,
Issue #6 gives sweeping authority to the City of Owasso to develop and implement a downtown
plan. This authority however, does not speak to situations arising from a land use designation in
the Owasso Downtown Development District Plan that is inconsistent with the Owasso 2010
Plan. The authority is given only to develop, approve and implement a downtown plan. Issues
arising from concerned surrounding property owners should have been addressed at the time of
the adoption of the Downtown Plan, not as staff is attempting to implement the plan through
appropriate rezoning requests. Therefore, staff suggests that the land use designation delineated
in the Owasso Downtown Development District Plan would and more importantly, should
supercede the Owasso 2010 Master Plan designation.
Determine the extents oj what should be considered
a downtown or
affected landowners, downtown citizens, and staff' to a course
oj action.
Commission a planning study to assess all possible opportunities and constraints oj
downtown which could include: overlay zoning controlling landscaping and architecture,
extension oj N. pt St. to the service road, and a tax increment financing district to
provide junding jor public improvements.
Consider the option oj allowing a college design studio class to take on the downtown
area as a class project.
Develop an overlay zone to assure proper architecture is being considered
Action Statement:
Develop a downtown district plan.
Issue #6
A deteriorating and distressed downtown area.
Excerpt(s) from the Owasso 2010 Master Plan:
1. General Area Map.
2. OZ 03-03 Application.
3. Legal Notice.
4. Letter to Sun"ounding Property Owners.
ATTACHMENTS:
Upon Planning Commission approval, the item will be scheduled for the April 15, 2003 regularly
scheduled City Council meeting.
The rezoning request will be heard by the City of Owasso Planning Commission on Monday, April 7,
2003. Staff will recommend approval of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The rezoning was reviewed at the March 26, 2003 regular meeting of the City of Owasso
Technical Advisory Committee. Staff or utility providers provided no comments.
TECHNIC.AL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Staff has received several phone calls in opposition of the request. Additionally, staff made
copies of the required legal notification, site maps and copies of the Downtown Development
District Plan available to concerned area residents. Staff does anticipate several public statements
in opposition of the request for a CG (Commercial General District) zoning designation at the
April 7,2003 Planning Commission Meeting.
Staff feels that land use implementation strategies in this area should support the retention and
development of a mixture of uses, business products and services. Mr. Moody's application is
requesting a zoning classification that would accommodate a lawn care and landscaping business;
a use which has not and is not currently represented in the downtown area. Therefore, staff can
come to only one request by is with stated
intent and purpose should a
recommendation.
The relocation oj residents to more stable and viable living environments (such as
north oj 76th Street) would provide the opportunity to assemble land, concentrate
complementary uses and enhance the business environment in Owasso.
I, GENE R. BROOKES OF ST. ANDREWS CIR., ALLOW T MOODY
REPRESENT ME DURING REZONING PROCEEDINGS FOR PROPERTY
DESCRIBED 1 BLOCK 30 ORIGINAL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
February 20, 2003
Dated at Owasso, Oklahoma, this 6th day of March, 2003.
~ --?
L-/4t'(
Robert Moore
City Planner
A map showing the proposed rezoning accompanies this notice.
For more information on the proposed rezoning contact the
Owasso City Planner, City Hall, 111 N. Main Street, Owasso,
Oklahoma 74055, or phone (918) 376-1543.
The City Council's review of the recommendation of the Planning
Commission on the proposed rezoning shall be at a meeting time
and place to be detennmed by the Council, said infonnation to be
available from the Owasso City Planner.
In the event that such proposed rezoning is approved, in whole or
in part, by the Owasso Planning Commission, said Planning
Commission shall submit its recommendation to the City Council of
the City of Owasso for its consideration and action, as provided by
law.
All persons interested in this matter may be present at the hearing
and present their objections to or arguments for any or all of the
above matters.
To be considered is a rezoning approximately .jL acre, more or
less from RS-3 (Residential Single Family lIigh Density District) to
(Commercial General District).
The property is further described as 304 S. Birch St., Owasso, OK.
Lot 1, Block 30, Original Town of Owasso, An Addition to the
City of Owasso, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
will
place,
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will held
Planning CmYlJTIission., in Comr:iJ.upity
OkJahoma, at 7:00 on
APPLICATION:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF A HEARING ON A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF OW ASSO, OKLAHOMA
Robert Moore
City Planner
Sincerely,
~
Dated at Owasso, Oklahoma, this 6th day of March, 2003.
Information and maps showing the property location may be inspected in the office of the City
Planner, 111 North Main Street, Owasso, Oklahoma, 74055 or by calling 376-1543. This is your
only personal notification of this request.
As an abutting or nearby property owner, you are being notified so that you may be able to
express your views or concerns regarding this request. If you are unable to attend this meeting,
please forward any comments you may have in writing to the Owasso Community Development
Depmiment, PO Box 180, Owasso, OK 74055. These comments will be presented to the
Owasso Planning Commission at the scheduled public hearing by the Community Development
Staff.
The property is further described as 304 S. Birch St., Owasso, OK.
Lot 1, Block 30, Original Town of Owasso, An Addition to the City of Owasso, Tulsa County,
State of Oklahoma.
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Owasso. Planning
Commission in the Owasso Community Center, 301 South Cedar, Owasso, Oklahoma at 7:00
PM on the ih day of April, 2003. At that time and place, the Owasso Planning Commission will
consider a request from Scott Moody, applicant, on behalf of Gene Brooks, owner for a proposed
change of the zoning classification of approximately .32 acre, more or less from RS-3
(Residential Single Family High Density District) to CG (Commercial General District). The
subject property is described as follows:
,~~~~
~;:~;,:-"
- OJ ~'\ -'-......0 '
. ""/ I" ,. ;,>, \" '.
(~r (\~.'=~.~{J \r;:.~*..\
\ ' -' .fI'. \.~ -I) ,
. \'~ "I :
\~~~i
(918) 376.-1540
(918)
111 North Main Street
Box 180
City of O}VClSSO
Departn1ent of ComJ11unity Development
The City of Owasso Public Works Department has authorized the building expansion to come
within 5 feet of the existing roadway. However, the applicant has submitted a proposal that
would construct the addition within 15 feet of the existing roadway. And, with an existing right-
of-way width of 80 feet, staff finds that any future roadway expansion on E. 5th Ave. could be
The City of Owasso Community Development Department and Public Works Department have
had several opportunities to review the proposed addition. And, after those reviews, all
interested departments have concluded that the benefits of such a proposal outweigh any of the
potential negative impacts. City engineers have concluded that the only issue that needs to be
addressed is the construction of a marked barricade located at the southeastern corner of the
addition. The applicant has agreed and the construction of the barricade will coincide with the
construction of the building addition.
The applicant has informed staff that the request is based solely on the internal workings of this
meat processing plant. The internal flow of the meat processing procedure requires that the
addition be constructed in the proposed location, rather than the other vacant areas shown on the
attached plot plan. City staff agrees.
ANALYSIS:
National Steak Processors has received Board of Adjustment approval for the encroachment into
the minimum 50 foot building setback line on property zoned ll., (Industrial Light District). The
approval was received at the March 25, 2003 regular meeting.
The applicant is requesting this closure to permit the expansion of the existing National Steak
Processors facility. A general area map and complete legal description have been included with
your packet.
The City of Owasso has received a request from National Steak Processors for the partial closing
of the northern 40' right-of-way along E. 5th Ave. The subject property is located approximately
600 feet west of the 5th Ave. and U.S. Hwy 169 Service Road intersection, further described as
301 E. 5th Ave.
BACKGROUND:
ROBERT MOORE
PLANNER
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OWASSO
TO:
MEMORANDUM
1. General Area Map.
2. Right-of-Way Closure Application.
3. Site Plan.
ATfACHMENTS:
Upon Planning Commission approva~ the item will be scheduled for the April 15, 2003 regularly
scheduled City Council meeting.
The right-of-way closure request will be heard by the City Owasso Planning Commission on
Monday, April 7, 2003. Staffwill recommend approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
Technical Advisory the at
regular meeting. At that meeting, the following comments were noted.
1. Community Development - The City Council must
closure.
2. Community Development - The applicant must provide an official copy of the light-of-way
vacation to the Community Development Department after Distllct Court approval.
3. Public Works - The applicant must construct a collision barricade. The constru(,iion of the
barricade must coincide with the construction of the building addition.
accommodated without issue.
Staff should also point out that the addition to the existing site would provide several new
employment opportunities in the City of Owasso. National Steak Processors, Inc. has concluded
that a minimum of 35 with a potential for 50 new jobs will be created by this expansion. And, in
this time of economic uncertainty staff feels that the manner in which the new jobs are created
would most certainly outweigh any negative impact that the creation may have.
11 ~110 1.(,/nll ("nT" I rl
BKC:asc
cc: Brenda Dietzfeld
Larry Patterson
B. Kenneth Cox, J1'.
We represent National Steak Processors, Inc. ("NSP"). On behalf of NSP, we hereby
request that the City of Owasso close that portion of the right-of-way as is legally described on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. We further request that the City of Owasso close that portion of the
Utility Easement which is legally described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The purpose of
these closures is to permit the expansion of the existing facility of NSP in the City of Owasso as
depicted on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. It is anticipated that this expansion will cost
approximately $1,850,000 and will create approximately 35 new jobs in Owasso.
B. Kenneth Cox, J1'.
(918) 594~()418
kcox@hallestill.col11
W.'\LTER 13 HALL (1'}2J-19!)(Jj
FRED SNELSON j 1921i-IIJH7)
~NOT t\[)f,lITlED IN OK LAfIOI\.IA
r-<ORTIIWEST ARKANSAS
CURTIS E HOGLE"
ROBER"f K RHO,\D:)'
Jt\1vIES L H,\HIUS.
WASHINGTOr\ 1).(.
JOHN 13 RlDOLPH
JOSEPH R ,\lE:\IORI"i\;O.
DONALD I{ DIl'\A~.
JOHN J McDERMOTT"
JAMES B WilCOX, JR.
CRAIG ..... KOENIGS.
SAN DEEP S KATHURIV
Dr\:-.JIEL J GLO\-"EK
KE~T.\ (ilL:.IIA~LJ
J(}l\," EPSTU~~
E!.,\J~n:: R nJRf-.JER
CHRISTIM'-i S HLCK__\IlY
SlJS,\N,\;.-\ (j \'U[GEl.l
J TODO \VOOI.ER)'
SARAH K OBEIC\f)OI<FEK
Very truly yours,
D. r: {;v?~
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments
Dear Mr. Moore:
Re: National Steak and Poultry
Robert Moore
City Planner
City of Ow ass 0
III N. Main
Owasso, OK 74055
March 3, 2003
:'/ORTIIWEST ARKANSAS OFFICE
ONL; EAST CE0ITER STREET
SUITE) 15
F,\ YETTEVI LLE. All 72701.5388
TELEPHONE (479) 973~5200
FACSIMILE (479)97}-0520
WASHINGTON. D.C. OFFICE
112020 '" STREET. N W
SUITE 700. NORTH BUILDING
WASHINGTON. 0 C 20036.3~106
TELEPHONE (202) 973.1200
FACSIMILE 12(2)973.1212
OKLAlIOI\IA CITY. OKL\1I0.\L\ OFFICE
lOa NORTllllROAUWA Y
llA"K 0"10 CECiTER. SUITE 2'JOO
OKLAHO\1/\ CITY. OK 7.J 102.8865
TELEPHONE (405155).2828
FACSI MI LE (405) 55).2855
OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAUOi\lA
ROBERT 0 NI:LON
J FRED GIST
MIOIAfL F. SI\!ITH
RALPH [ SEALS, JR
I{OBERT D LOONEY, JR
$i-l.ARON T TIIOY1,\:)
MICHAEL J \IA5S.-\0
\1,\R()-\REl.\ .';\\.'J,\I\lER
MltT!.,\!:l. T K[I::iTF.R
SUSA.'\ L lJ,\TES
RO:\:ALDu i~.-\Y JR
RO:'-i..\LD.\ WHITE
FRED \1 I3U\T01\
SlEVEN .\ JJROL;SS,\RD
STEVE\: w ~OULE
\lICI1AEL l. NEr-.1EC
JOSEPH D rl~CHER
'\NGEL )'N L DALE
R 1\1..\ RK PETltlClI
PA:-'IEL\ H GOLDBERG
:'I.1ARK BANNER
ROBERT F DOLXjHERTY
T LANE \,'ILSO:-.J
BETSY (j JACKSON
ROBERT P FlTZ-P-\ !'lUCK
SARAH JA"-'r.: i\lcKI~?\E~'
JOH1-: F iiEIL. ill
JA."iE L ;\LLI'\;(jII.~\M
PA,\'I[L.\ S .\:\[)ERSOl\.
JEN>.;!FER E :\IL'ST,\IN
~1:\R::;HALL j WELLS
http://www.hJllestill.com
TELEPHONE (918) 594-0400
f'.'\CS 1M I LE (918) 594-0505
ANTHO:--1Y J JORClE:--JSO:\
I lEA TIlER L CL:PP
;..10~rc.>\ A PLAKE
K )'LE D FRE[.\!.\i'\
MOSle.\ L MAPLE
\\' DEKE C:\~'\DA
/'I.lICHAEL J U5S.-\lI
130}.;NIE N HACKLER
JANICE L GADDIS
KlMBERLY R BlEDLER
KERI G_ WILLlA;\lS
JOHN J TREBILCOCK
MATTHEW T CROOK
JOHN T RICHER
GENEVIEVE L. SCHtdOOK
320 SOLT!I BOSTON A VENUE
St' ITE 400
TULSA, OKLAHOMA
74103-3708
A PROFcSSIOf\AL CORPOR..\TIO'"
HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE, GOLDEN & NELSON
OF COl):\'SEL
JOI-IN S ESTILL. JR
WILLIAM \\' PRITCHARD
DAVID L HILL
RAY,'yl0ND 8 KELLY
AL;tJREY P RASMuSSEN
CUVE A SEYMOUR
<.\MFS C 1 H..\RLJ\\,'ICK
i Ha., t,\:-i () (1A 8i...E
1"110\-1..\,) F C;OL.Dl:~
1.,\I{j{ Y \\ ,')Ai\DEL
-\",Uf{L\\'.\l WULO\
FR..-\0.K ,\1 llM;EOORt'-i
J PATRICK C'RE,\llt,
J KEV!N H..\ YES
,\lI(']-1AEI. D GRA YES
J:\:\-lES D SA TRO'....l
RICHARD _-\ GROE:\END\'KE, JR
GR..\YOOS D LL'THEY, JR
m:L L GUST.....FSON
\-IARK K BLOl\;GEWICZ
'\'11CllAEI.. O. COOKE
KE>..t\ETH L HL?'-JT
8 KENNETH COX, JR
Dm-:ALD L KArlL
[J KENYON W1LLlA.\IS, JI{
TlIQ,\l..\S P SCJ lROEDTEH
L\\jE~ J PROSZEK
J..\:\H~S ;\1 REED
1"l-IO'v1.-\S -\ CKEEK.\IORE III
:) i FI'HEN \\' fL\.,
NEW-JE (20)
2/27/03:JE:sky
2114.3 1 National Steak & Poultry-2 Esmt Lgls.doc
STARTING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE E/2 OF THE NE/4 OF SAID
SECTION 31; THENCE DUE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID E/2
OF THE NE/4 FOR 964.32' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT~OF-WAY
LINE OF 5TH AVENUE; THENCE DUE EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-
OF~WAY LINE FOR 40.001 TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-'OF~WAY LINE ON A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26048'14" AND A RADIUS OF
340.001 FOE 159.06' TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" OF SAID TRACT OF
-- -
LAND; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTEELY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 8057'40" AND A RADIUS OF 340.00' FOR 53.18' TO A POINT OF
EEVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT~OF-WAY LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21026'33" AND A RADIUS OF 260.00' FOR 97.30';
THENCE DUE WEST FOR 50.90'; THENCE N 58009'36" W FOR 96.69';
THENCE DUE NORTH FOR 17.53' TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" OF SAID
TRACT OF LAND.
A TRACT OF LAND THAT IS A PART OF THE E/2 OF THE NE/4 OF SECTION
31v T~21'-"Nv R-14-E, INDIAN BASE AND MERIDIANv CITY OF OWASSOv
TULSA COUNTY; OKLAHOMA, ACCORDING TO U.S. GOVERNMENT SURVEY
THEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS v TO~WIT:
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY CLOSING
EXHmIT "A"
SHEET 2 OF 2
The City of Owasso Public Works Department has authorized the building expansion to come
within 5 feet of the existing roadway. However, the applicant has submitted a proposal that
would construct the addition within 15 feet of the existing roadway. And, with an existing right-
of-way width of 80 feet, staff finds that any future roadway expansion on E. 5th Ave. could be
accommodated without issue.
The City of Owasso Community Development Department and Public Works Department have
had several opportunities to review the proposed addition. And, after those reviews, all
interested departments have concluded that the benefits of such a proposal outweigh any of the
potential negative impacts. City engineers have concluded that the only issue that needs to be
addressed is the construction of a marked barricade located at the southeastern corner of the
addition. The applicant has agreed and the construction of the barricade will coincide with the
construction of the building addition.
The applicant has informed staff that the request is based solely on the internal workings of this
meat processing plant. The internal flow of the meat processing procedure requires that the
addition be constructed in the proposed location, rather than the other vacant areas shown on the
attached plot plan. City staff agrees.
ANALYSIS:
National Steak Processors has received Board of Adjustment approval for the encroachment into
the minimum 50 foot building setback line on property zoned IL (Industrial Light District). The
approval was received at the March 25, 2003 regular meeting.
The applicant is requesting this closure to pennit the expansion the existing National Steak
Processors facility. A general area map and complete legal description have been included with
your packet.
The City of Ow as so has received a request from National Steak Processors for the partial closing
of the southern 17.5' utility easement for a part of the E/2 of the NE/4 of Section 31, Township
21 North, Range 14 East. The subject property is located approximately 600 feet west of the E.
5th Ave. and u.s. Hwy 169 Service Road intersection, further described as 301 5th Ave.
BACKGROUND:
ROBERT MOORE
PLANNER
FHOM:
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OW ASSO
TO:
MEMORANDUM
1. General Area Map.
2. Easement Closure Application.
3. Site Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
Upon Planning Commission approval, the item will be scheduled for the April 15, 2003 regularly
scheduled City Council meeting.
The easement closure request will be heard by the City of Planning Commission on Monday,
April 7, 2003. Staffwill recommend approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Owasso Technical AdvisOlY Committee at
meeting. that meeting, the following comments were
1. Community Development The City of Owasso City Council must approve the easement closure.
Community Development .~ The applicant must provide an official copy of the easement vacation
to the Community Development Department after District Court approval.
3. Public Works - The applicant must construct a collision banicade. The construction of the
balTicade must coincide with the construction of the building addition.
Staff should also point out that the addition to the existing site would provide several new
employment oppOliunities in the City of Owasso. National Steak Processors, Inc. has concluded
that a minimum of 35 with a potential for 50 new jobs will be created by this expansion. And, in
this time of economic uncertainty staff feels that the manner in which the new jobs are created
would most certainly outweigh any negative impact that the creation may have.
BKC:asc
cc: Brenda Dietzfeld
Larry Patterson
B. Kenneth Cox, J r.
Please let me know if YOLl have any questions or comments
We represent National Steak Processors, Inc. ("NSP"). On behalf of NSP, we hereby
request that the City of Owasso close that portion of the right-of-way as is legally described on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. We further request that the City of Ow as so close that portion of the
Utility Easement which is legally described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The purpose of
these closures is to permit the expansion of the existing facility of NSP in the City of Owasso as
depicted on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. It is anticipated that this expansion will cost
approx~mately $1,850,000 and will create approximately 35 new jobs in Owasso.
8. Kenneth Cox, h.
(918) 594-.()418
kcox@hallestill.com
WALTER 8 HALL (192J.1%61
FRED~ NEL5Q:-.l. I92S.llJIC')
~~OT ADMITTED IN OKLNIOII,I!1\
l"iORTlIWE5T ARKA,"iSA$
CURns E HOGUE~
ROBERT K RH(J,\t)S~
JA:VIES L HAIHW;e
\VASIIINGTON D.C.
JOHN II Rl'DOLPH
JOSEPH It \IE.\f8RINO~
DONALD R DIN.-\:'\lq
JOHN j ,\4cDER.\.fOTT"
JA:V1ES B. WILCOX. JR ~
CRAIG .\, KOE:-JIGSQ
SA,~OEEP::i KA THL'Rl:\~
DA:'>JJEI. J GLOVf:H
KE:'-.iT\ l.i;L:.IL-\~D
lOI\, .... EPS rEI.~.
ELAINE R fL'R.'IEH
CHRfSTJA:\ ') Ht;CK \in'
SL'S..\N\iA G VOEGELI
J TODD WOGLER'\,
SARAH K 08ER~[)()RFER
Very truly yours,
b, r:~~
Dear Me Moore:
Re: National Steak and Poultry
Rober11\/Ioore
City Planner
City of Owasso
111 N. I'v'lain
Owasso, OK 74055
March 3, 2003
:~OlnHWEST AIU,A;\SAS OFFICE
ONE EAST CE:-iTER STREET
SUITE ll5
FA YIOTTEVILLE, AR 72701.5388
TELEPHONE (-179) 973-5200
FACSLvllLE (479) 97J-052D
IV..\SlIICiGTON, D.C. OFFICE
1120 20rn STREET, N.W
SUITE 7DO. \:ORTH BUILDING
WASHINGTON. D C 200J6-34D6
TELEPHONE (202) 07).1200
FACSIMILE (202197J-1212
OKL"IH}\IA CITY, Oh:LAlIOMA OFFICE
IIID NOIHH BROADWA Y
B.-\.,K O"'iE CENTER. SUITE 2'iOO
OKLAHO.VIA CITY. OK 7l 102-H~65
TELEPHONE 14(5) 553-2828
FACSIMILE (405) 553.2855
OKL,\HO,'\t!,\ CITY, OKLAHOMA
ROBERT 0 NELON
J FRED GIST
MICHAEL E. SMITH
RALPH E SEALS. J R
ROIJERT 0 LOONEY. JR
SHARON r rHO MAS
MJCHAEL J MASSAD
ha!lesti!l.com
\IAR(jARE-r -\ S''vi\IIvlER
....:ICitAEL T KEESTER.
iLS,\N L \.JA TE.-)
ROI\;A LO U Rr\ '1'. JR
RU.\.-\LD.\ WillTE
FRED '\'1 i~L '\TO,,-
STEVEN.\ 8ROL;SSARD
STEYE;\i w :::;OLLE'
....lJCHt\EL L NE.\lEC
JOSEIIH D FI:\CHER
A.'~GEL Yl\ L DALE
It MARK PETRICH
P\,\lELA H. GOLDBERG
,\IARK BAN:-JER
ROBERT F DOL:GHERTY
T LANE \VfLSON
BETSY G j,\CKSO:-.l
ROBERT P PITZ-Pt\ fRICK
SARAH J;\N[ McKIN.'\iEY
JOHN F HelL. !II
JA:--iE l ,.\LLL\;GHAM
P-\I\IELA S ~N[)ERSON
JE.N~!fER [: \lL.:.';T^\!\i
-V1ARSH/\LL j WELLS
TELEPHONE (9] 8) 594..0400
r: ACSIIVlI LE (918) 59400505
..\,\lTllO'\;Y J jORGE~SON
HL\ THER L Cl.:PP
.\tONIC.:.. .\ PLAKE
KYLE 0 FREE.\fr\N
~-I01\IC.\ L .'vlAPLE
W lJEKE CA.\;..\ DA
.'vlIC1IAEL 1 LJSSAU
BONNIE \< HACKLER
JA:-JICE L. GADD!S
KIMBERLY It 8IEDLEI~
KERI G WILLIAMS
JOHN j TRE81LCOCK
.\IA TTHEW T CROOK
JOHN T RICHER
GENEV1E\'E L SCHMOOK
3ZO SOL'TH BOSTON ..\VE:\LE
Sl'lTE 400
TULSA,OKLMIOi\I.-\
7410303708
,\ I'R()FESSIO.~'\L COHI'OR~TlO.'i
HALL, ESTILL, HARDVVICK, GABLE, GOLDE~ & NELSON
OF cr)ll~SEL
JOHN S ESTILL JR
WILLiA,....l W PRITOtARD
f)A,VID L HILL
I{,\ Y ,\.10/'.10 B KEtL Y
\CI)I{EY P R/\SMLSS~~;
CLIVE A SEYMQL'R
rlIO\l.-\S :I, C!H-:cKMORt Ifl
:"\TFPHEN \\." RA'1'
J.\.\lES ,\.1 REED
i .\.\1ES C r liARD\'dCK
"!"H()\IA,S D GAULE
i"i1t!\JA:) F GOLDE'"
l \/{HY,.... 5'\i-..0I.:L
'~~()RU\' ivl \\'01.0\'
F;{.-\SK \tl HAGEiJOR.\j
J ?-\ fRICK CRE~II.\i
J KEVIN HAYES
"lICI-!AEL Q GJ{A'liES
J .\.\1ES D SATRO,.....'
R.ICHAIW A GROE.'iENDYKE. JR.
GR:-\ '{DON 0 LUTHEY. m
DEL L GL::iTAfSON
\1--\RK K BLONGE\VICZ
~,lICHAt:L 0 COOKE
KG,NETH L HLNT
B KENNETH cox. JR
DO:-'ALD L KAHL
o KE;'\/YON WILLtA\IS, JR
lI-lOI'-.I.-\S P SCHROI::DTER
j.-\:'vIES! PR.OSZEK
NEW-JE (20)
2/27/03:JE:sh:y
2114.3 I National Steak & Poultry-2 Esmt LgIs.doc
NORTHWESTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
36025'45" AND A RADIUS OF 260.00' FOR 165.31' TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVE AND NORTHWESTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35045'54" AND A RADIUS OF 340.00' FOR 212.23',
AND DUE WEST FOR 22.50' TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" OF SAID
15.00' WIDE STRIP OF LAND.
FOLLOWS:
THENCE
TO A POINT OF CURVE;
S 89020" 0 9" W FOR 24 . 41 '
LINE AS
NORTHERLY
SAID
ALONG
THENCE
AVENUE;
STARTING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE E/2 OF THE NE/4 OF SAID
SECTION 31; THENCE DUE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID E/2
OF THE NE/4 FOR 964.32' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF 5TH AVENUE; THENCE DUE WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-'OF~WAY LINE
FOR 17.50' TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING" OF SAID 15.00' WIDE STRIP
OF LAND; THENCE DUE NORTH FOR 15.00' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY
I,INE OF A 17.50' UTILITY EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
LINE AS FOLLOWS: DUE WEST FOR 22.50' TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
35045'54" AND A RADIUS OF 357.50' FOR 223.16' TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36025'45" AND A RADIUS OF 242.50' FOR
154.18', AND N 89029'09" E FOR 24.41'; THENCE S 00039'51" E FOR
17.50' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 5TH
.A 15.00' WIDE STRIP OF LAND THAT IS A PART OF THE E/2 OF THE
NE/4 OF SECTION 31, T I~N, R.'~14-E, INDIAN BASE AND MERIDIAN,
CITY OF OWASSO, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA! J.\.CCORDING TO U. S.
GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS, TO~WIT:
EASEMENT VACATION
EXHIBIT" A"
SHEET 2 OF 2
@ The building contains a total of 25,000 sq. feet of space, with approximately 8432 sq. feet
of that total located in an upstairs floor.
@ The property contains a total of two acres.
@ The church originally accepted an offer of $650,000 for the property.
@ There exist two parking lots that contain approximately 107 parking spaces.
@ There are nine heating and air conditioning units that serve the facility.
@ The largest room will seat approximately 300 persons.
INITIAL INFORMATION:
During that discussion, the staff plans to present information to the City Council relating to the
physical layout of the facility, funding options, anticipated purchase price and potential uses
should the City acquire the property.
It is my understanding that there is one, and perhaps two, anticipated offer (contract) for the
property that will be presented in the immediate future. It is my further understanding that it is
likely that the church will be receptive to waiting for a few days before a decision is made as to
which buyer will be selected for initial negotiations. The reason for that delay is specifically to
allow the City to make a contract offer for the purchase of the property. Because ofthe reception
the initial discussion relating to this purchase has received, it is my intention to place on our
Work Session agenda a discussion item relating to such purchase.
As each of you know, the Central Baptist Church building, located immediately east of the City's
Municipal Building, is once again for sale. While there had been a potential purchaser and a
signed contract, that offer was withdrawn and the building is once again available.
BACKGROUND:
April 2003
DATE:
COUNCIL
THE HONORABLE MAYOR
TO:
MEMORANDUM
Ci tyCollncil\Mcmos\2003\ChllrchBlIilding 1
Should any councilor desire specific information or have specific questions relating to this issue,
it would be helpful if those requests/questions were provided in advance of the meeting in order
that correct information be supplied.
Due to anticipated pending offers, a discussion of the issues relating to the purchase must be held
without delay. Therefore, it is anticipated that the staff will present the issues and options and
the councilors will provide input and direction based on the discussion. The staff discussion will
include members the Community Development Department, Department, and Finance
Department.
PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION:
CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH PROPERTY
APRIL 4, 2003
PAGE 2
The staff has completed a preliminary review of this request and believes the concept and request
should be supported as a temporary assistance measure. Generally, the Owasso jail has space
available in the ten-day holding facility. Any agreement, however, would have to recognize that
use of the Owasso jail by the City of Collinsville would be on a "space available" basis.
STAFF REVIEW:
It should be noted that the City of Collinsville has taken action to solve their long-term problem
by purchasing a facility that, when remodeled, will contain a Police Department and jail facility.
The Police Department should be able to occupy the facility within 30-45 days, however, the jail
will not be completed until July 2004.
The Collinsville City Manager has approached the City of Owasso with a unique request for
assistance in providing a short-term solution to their problem. The request is that the City of
Owasso allow the City of Collinsville to use its jail facility on a space-available basis for both
initial arrest and when offenders are sentenced to serve jail time by the Municipal Judge.
The City of Collinsville lost the use of their jail facility on December 1, 2001 when their
municipal building was destroyed by fire. Subsequently, the Collinsville Municipal Court has
been forced to operate without the availability of a place to incarcerate offenders should their
Judge sentence someone to serve time in jail for an offense. Since jail space is not yet available
to suburban cities through the Tulsa County Criminal Justice Authodty, Collinsville has, in
effect, faced a situation wherein their judicial system has limited options.
BACKGROUND:
April 4, 2003
DATE:
AGREEMENT
CITY OF OW ASSO JAIL FOR THE PURPOSE
SENTENCED OFFENDERS AND ARRESTEES
THE HONORABLE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL
OWASSO
TO:
MEMORANDUJ\1
Ci lyCOlll1Ci I\M el11os\2 00 3 \.1 a i I F ac i 1 i ly( Co II i I1svi Ilc)
NOTE: Because of the newness of this request, the actual Interlocal Agreement is still being
drafted by Chief Yancey and Mr. Gray, and may not be available for the meeting.
The staff will present the concept to the City Council during the April 8th Work Session, and will
be prepared to address questions.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
1. Space Being Available
Payment of a Daily Charge
3. Certain Limits of Liability
4, A Date Celiain for Telmination of the Agreement
The use of an Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Collinsville and Owasso is an
appropriate vehicle for addressing this request. Through such an agreement, the City could agree
to holding prisoners from the City of Collinsville subject to:
PROPOSED SOLUTION:
The staff has also conducted a review of the cost associated with housing prisoners. While
certainly not inclusive of all indirect costs, it appears that a daily charge of $27.00 will cover the
cost of food, utilities, supplies (fingerprint cards, pictures, and some indirect costs. It is the
staff position that a $27,00 per day, charge will cover any
holding a
COST:
USE OF JAIL FACILITY
APRIL 4, 2003
PAGE 2